The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOMMUNITY RECYCLING FACILITY - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2016-05-24Fort of Current Planning 281 N. College Ave. Fors Collins, CO 80524 Fax 970-224.6134 FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 18, 2015 TO: Street Maintence Program- To4 Kno ma PROJECT PLANNER: Clay Frickey FDP150047 City of Fort Collins Community Recycle Center Please return all continents to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: January 13, 2016 If you do not have access to the Accela program, please send your comments via email to: efrickey@fcgov.com Note - Please identify Your redlines for future re,Lerence No Problems Problems or concerns (see below, attached, or Accela) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 444 (kt sAi re _Drainage Report _Other tility _Redline Utility _Landscape Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: The proposal should include curb, gutter, sidewalk along Timberline. If this is to be constructed with a different project, then there should a note on the plans. The future Timberline layout is shown in grey and noted as by others. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: The operation of the access to Timberline needs to be discussed. We don't think the'pork chop' shown will function very well, or adequtely limit users of the center to a right -in, right -out. If the Timberline project will build a median in 2016, we should explore a left in (3/4 movement). In the meantime we could leave the access without a porkchop and simply sign it with no left turn. The Porkchop was planned to just be interim with asphalt curb and a place for extra signs. We want to train users that it is right in right out and if left open, we would not be able to prevent lefts in from happening in the interim. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, , dmoneri tDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please confirm that water and sewer services are not needed for this site. They are not. irrigation will be taken from the existing system. City of Fort Collins Integrated Recycling Facility April 6, 2015 The Site plan note #3 references a plat. I didn't think that there was a plat. For the entrance driveway — there doesn't seem a need to extend the curb east past the row line as it will just be removed next year. The pork chop. If this remains a part of the plan. Label it as interim to be removed with the planned road improvements. Provide design information, dimensions, radii, width of pavement, spot elevations, turning template exhibit to show that the trucks can make the turn. Emergency overflow spillway needs to be moved west to accommodate the future sidewalk. The sidewalk cannot slope like the outfall structure, so the structure needs to be far enough behind the row and the sidewalk that the bermed (high) areas can slope down to the sidewalk that will need to be placed at the spill elevation or below. I don't have an old copy of the ODP, so I don't know what it looked like before. Typically the following notes are included on an ODP and do not see these on this document yet. Any change in the location of access points with PDP submittals needs to comply with the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code and the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. Street Standards will be subject to the design standards in effect at the time of application for project development plans (PDPs). Off -site improvements may be required at the time of PDP in order to meet level of service for all modes of transportation. On the ODP. The access points need to be labeled as Right -in -right -out access points. This can be done in the legend with the arrow. On the ODP. Need to place an access arrow at the driveway to the substation, unless that is going away. r Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgo v. com/developmentreview Please see comment responses below in red text. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickev(EMcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: Please remove the site plan overlay from the ODP. We were instructed earlier to include it, but it's removed now... Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: The plant list says there should be 5 Western Hackberry trees but there are only 4 shown on the landscape plan. Where is the fifth Western Hackberry? Please update the landscape plan to include the fifth Western Hackberry. The drawing data base had lingering attributes that needed to be purged to correct the legend (this made the legend plant count one additional plant above to the amount shown). These counts have been corrected. Please also see landscape at the west and south boundaries, as it appears these were overlooked in your original counts. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: Similarly, the plant list shows 4 Bur Oaks but the landscape plan only shows 3. Please update the landscape plan to include the fourth Bur Oak. Note above Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: The striped median should be landscaped with a mix of ornamental trees and shrubs. This will help with meeting the parking lot interior landscaping standards in 3.2.1(E)(5). Per our earlier discussion, planting the striped median will hinder truck access to the recycle containers to the south. In lieu of this landscape, we have added landscape to the east side of the future lot and added relocated trees to this area. Relocated deciduous trees intended for the lawn west of the power station will need to be located to this area as well to avoid utility and disc golf conflicts. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: There is a discrepancy between then plant list and landscape plan y for the Moonglow Rocky Mountain Junipers as well. The plant list shows 12 while the landscape plan only shows 11. Please add 1 more Moonglow Rocky Mountain Juniper to the landscape plan. See comment response 2 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 �2 04/01/2015: Will this project provide street trees along Timberline? If so, they are not shown on any of the plans. Please update the landscape plan with the species, quantities and locations of street trees. The trees should be spaced 30-40 feet apart and 40 feet away from light poles per the standards in 3.2.1(D) (1)• Based on discussion with Tim Kemp at Capital Projects, the street trees and associated turf will be part of the 2016 Timberline widening project. Tim provided basic locations for these trees, but final selections will be determined with competition of the Timberline improvements. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: There is a discrepancy between then plant list and landscape plan for the Hairy Mountain Mahogany. The plant list shows 10 while the landscape plan only shows 7. Please add 3 more Hairy Mountain Mahogany to the landscape plan. See comment response 2 Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: There is a discrepancy between then plant list and landscape plan for the Apache Plume. The plant list shows 20 while the landscape planshows 23. Please update the plant list to reflect the 23 shown on the landscape plan. See comment response 2 Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: There is a discrepancy between then plant list and landscape plan for the Fragrant Dwarf Sumac. The plant list shows 43 while the landscape plan only shows 33. Please add 10 more Fragrant Dwarf Sumacs to the landscape plan. See comment response 2 Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slanaenberaertaMcnov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/06/2015 04/06/2015: For the entrance driveway —there doesn't seem a need to extend the curb east past the row line as it will just be removed next year. The curb ends west of the property line. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/06/2015 04/06/2016: The Site plan note #3 references a plat. I didn't think that there was a plat. Typically there would be a plat. This note was removed. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/06/2015 04/06/2015: The pork chop. If this remains a part of the plan. Label it as interim to be removed with the planned road improvements. Provide design information, dimensions, radii, width of pavement, spot elevations, turning template exhibit to show that the trucks can make the turn. We have added this information. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/06/2016 04/06/2015: Emergency overflow spillway needs to be moved west to accommodate the future sidewalk. The sidewalk cannot slope like the outfall structure, so the structure needs to be far enough behind the row and the sidewalk that the bermed (high) areas can slope down to the sidewalk that will need to be placed at the spill elevation or below. Current design of Timberline is now shown greyed back. r Collins 0000M� Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview Please see comment responses below in red text. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickev(&-fcoov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: Please remove the site plan overlay from the ODP. We were instructed earlier to include it, but it's removed now... Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: The plant list says there should be 5 Western Hackberry trees but there are only 4 shown on the landscape plan. Where is the fifth Western Hackberry? Please update the landscape plan to include the fifth Western Hackberry. The drawing data base had lingering attributes that needed to be purged to correct the legend (this made the legend plant count one additional plant above to the amount shown). These counts have been corrected. Please also see landscape at the west and south boundaries, as it appears these were overlooked in your original counts. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: Similarly, the plant list shows 4 Bur Oaks but the landscape plan only shows 3. Please update the landscape plan to include the fourth Bur Oak. Note above Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: The striped median should be landscaped with a mix of ornamental trees and shrubs. This will help with meeting the parking lot interior landscaping standards in 3.2.1(E)(5). Per our earlier discussion, planting the striped median will hinder truck access to the recycle containers to the south. In lieu of this landscape, we have added landscape to the east side of the future lot and added relocated trees to this area. Relocated deciduous trees intended for the lawn west of the power station will need to be located to this area as well to avoid utility and disc golf conflicts. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 04/01/2015: There is a discrepancy between then plant list and landscape plan -„ The east edge of the riprap is on the west edge of the proposed Comment Originated: 04/06/2015 00 Comment Number: 5 04/06/2015: 1 don't have an old copy of the ODP, so I don't know what it looked like before. Typically the following notes are included on an ODP and do not see these on this document yet. Notes were added to the ODP (notes 1 thru 3) - Any change in the location of access points with PDP submittals needs to comply with the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code and the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. Street Standards will be subject to the design standards in effect at the time of application for project development plans (PDPs). nd Joe. Off -site improvements may be required at the time of PDP in order to meet drive level of service for all modes of transportation. The new the ultimateaimprovements for Timberline ation was worked out with ' na a e in We believe we have the OK to put this project in as and funded for 2016 construction for walks, bikes, median, et Comment Originated: 0410612015 Comment Number: 6 04/06/2015: On the ODP. The access points need to be labeled as Right -in -right -out access points. This can be done in the legend with the arrow. The label was updated. Comment Originated: 04/06/2015 Comment Number: 7at the driveway to 04/06/2015: On the ODP. Need to place an access No access torow the CRF is proposed from this location. the substation, unless that is going away. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanancaov.com Topic: Landscape Plans 1 Comment Originated: 04102/2015 Comment Number: 04/02/2015: The new location of the entry road impacts most of the existing trees. Are there any other viable options or modifications to the position of the entry road that can be considered to impact fewer trees? Please provide a written response. Plans for transplanting impacted good exist trees are included which is appreciated. s require a substantial portion of the site, and there The Recycle Center's operations and detention area are limited locations for these without substantially driving up costs. Access locations with the site are very limited because of separation distance requirements between neighboring access locations. The current midpoint access is the most cost effective service location. The alternate access location sharing the drive with Light and Power was another possibility, but would require removing additional spruce trees, and the added expense of pavement and grading. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Exist tree number 12 is shown as transplanted at its new location but is labeled to keep in place in the Disposition Table. At one time the detection pond needed to be larger and was impacting trees 11 and 12. The pond as e trees. The site was re -walked and the trees were been decreased in size and no longer impacts thes checked with Ralph Zentz 4/9/2015. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Tree Protection and Transplanting Notes edits and additions: Please add this sentence to note number 8. The city Forester shall provide the mitigation number. Add note number 21. Tree pruning and removal work shall be by a business that holds a current City of Fort Collins Arborist License and is on the Forestry Division hourly bid list. Add note number 22. Location for transplanted trees shall be staked by the City Project Manager and verified by the Landscape Architect. These notes were updated. Department: Light And Power Contact: Jim Spaulding, 970.416-2772, isoauldina[aUcaov com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Existing streetlight and splice box located in proposed entrance will need to be relocated south. System modification charges will apply. This street light is shown to be relocated. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, , dmoaenCocaov earn Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please see redlined plans and drainage report. Comments have been addressed. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please update detail drawings with current versions. These can be found in pdf at h'p://www.fcg0v.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo rms-guidelines-regulations .dwg's are available upon request - please email me at dmogen addressed @fcgov.com Comments have been Comment Number: 4 04/02/2015: An alternative compliance/variance form will be required for thenated: 04/02/2015 paver variance. Please request form from 9m29en@fQ9oy com Comments have been addressed Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please hatch ponding area for full forebay. Pond is hatched, but forebay will be the scalloped curb at the edge of the parking Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please include concrete ribbon on spillway as the spillway will be active for storms more frequent than the 100-year. Comments have been addressed Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please extend riprap to toe of spillway slope. The spillway configuration ties to the future sidewalk on Timberline. We would like to keep this configuration as the projects are less than a year apart and it would be temporary. The owner will accept that there may be repair needed in the interim if the spillway flows prior to the walk being built. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please shows contours in area of basin OS-2 to support sheet flow to inlet at design point 1. This is in error — the basin flows to a channel. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please provide inlet elevation and detail for pond bottom supporting 12" ponding depth. Elevation has been added and is shown on the profile. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 04/02/2015: Please review 100-year release rate. 0.2 cfs/acre does not apply to the Spring Creek basin, and historic release for basin A is shown to be 1.9 cfs. Comments have been addressed Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischiam(&fcaov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 3/25/2015: The current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. See redlines for corrections in the Erosion Control Plan and Erosion Control Report (Stormwater Management Control). The Site will also have to recalculate the Erosion Control Escrow Calculations based on redlines. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ We are working directly with Jesse to get the EC Report in the state he needs. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-8588, icountvD-fcaov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: The titles need to match other plan sets. See redlines. Comments have been addressed Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: The titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the sheets. Comments have been addressed See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: Please make changes as marked on sheet 2. See redlines. Comments have been addressed Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Comments have been addressed Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comments have been addressed Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: ODP: Please make sure all titles match, and the titles need to match other plan sets. See redlines. The titles were updated. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: ODP: We are waiting to receive deeds for the properties affected, to confirm the legal description provided. The legals for the land for the recycling center were prepared by the City Surveyor. We will add these legals to the sheet. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: ODP: Please provide the complete reception number for the marked note on sheet 2. See redlines. The reception number was updated. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: ODP: Sheet 3 was not provided for this plan set. Added. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: The titles need to match other plan sets. See redlines. Titles were changed. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Line over text was corrected per redlines Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Text was rotated. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: The title of sheet 5.0 does not match the index on sheet 1.0. See redlines. The title was corrected. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: The titles need to match other plan sets. See redlines. Titles were changed. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: We recommend removing all text from behind the lighting values. The plan is very busy, and this would clean it up a lot. See redlines. Underlying text was removed. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: Please make sure all titles match. The titles also need to match other plan sets. See redlines. Titles were changed. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: The titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the marked sheets. See redlines. Titles were changed. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: Please add an acceptable legal description for the project property. We suggest consulting with a Land Surveyor. Legals were provided by the City Surveyor Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: Remove "Site Plan" from the sheet title. See redlines. Site Plan was removed Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Line over text was corrected per redlines Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 03/31/2015: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Text was rotated. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221.6887, mwilkinson(Mcgov.com