HomeMy WebLinkAboutBIG DEAL FOUR PLEX - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2016-05-20Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com
November 13, 2012
Jeff Eggleston
2519 Ridge Creek Rd.
Fort Collins, CO 80528
Re: 621 S Meldrum
Description of project: This is a request to scrape an existing single family home and construct a 4-plex at
621 South Meldrum Street (Parcel # 9714111011). Each of the four units will be approximately 1,200 square
feet, and the overall building 4,800 square feet. The lot is zoned Neighborhood Conservation, Buffer District
(N-C-B) and falls within the TOD Overlay Zone. Multi -family dwellings are permitted subject to an
administrative (Type 1) review.
Please see the following summary of comments regarding the project request referenced above. The
comments offered informally by staff during the Conceptual Review will assist you in preparing the detailed
components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the
time of formal review of this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in
the review process, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project
Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126 or jholland@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970.416.2313, nbealsD-fcgov.com
1. Zoning echo's the comments made by Current Planning.
Land Use Code (LUC) 3.2.1 Requires that a Landscaping plan be provided that includes tree mitigation
as approved by the City Forester (see section for more details).
Response: The provided landscape plan indicates existing trees and how they are to be mitigated. We have
had an on -site meeting with the City Forester to evaluate the existing trees.
LUC 3.2.4 This section requires a lighting plan which includes a Photometric site plan and catalog cut
sheets for fixtures (see section for more details).
Response: A lighting plan is provided with the PDP sunmittal.
LUC 3.2.5 This is section requires that adequate sized enclosure for trash and recycling be provided
that is constructed on a concrete pad and 20ft away from a public sidewalk. Also designed with walk-in
access without having to open the main service gate.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, 'county§fcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: We would like the name to change, as a BDR is a city review process.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The boundary and legal description close.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The name in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision does not match the
name in the title.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: All easements must be locatable.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please provide both record and measured bearings & distances.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please make the set & found monument symbols the same size in the legend and
on the boundary.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12104/2012: Please add a distance to the found property corner on the west side of the alley.
See redlines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Is the found pin at the southeast corner of the boundary at the accepted corner?
Graphically it does not look like it. If it is not, show bearing & distance to accepted comer.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: If the Athur Ditch easement is existing, please note. If it is being dedicated by this
plat, a signature block & a signature by an appropriate Ditch Company representative is
required. The signature block must acknowledge & accept the easement dedication.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Are there any lienholders? If so, please add a Lienholders signature block.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please change "measured" to "assumed" in the Basis Of Bearings statement
(Note #1).
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Are there any easements being vacated by this plat?
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12104/2012
12/04/2012: Please correct the labels to the east of the property in Block 96.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please add "Basis Of Bearings" to the north line of the property.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Why is this property being replatted?
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The project name does not match the Subdivision Plat. We are suggesting that the
Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to change.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: There are line over text issues.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The Owner's Certification of Approval shows Elizabeth And City Park Corner LLC
as the owner. is this correct?
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221-6854, rbuffinaton �fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Add the curb stop and meter pit at the front of the lot preferably between the curb
and sidewalk. Get locates on gas and electric in that area and show on plans.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Revise note on tapping saddle as shown on the redlined plans.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Show a minimum of 3 feet between the domestic service and the fire line.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Peter Barnes, 970.416.2355, abarnes aOfcaov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: The wall height of the stair enclosure on the south side appears to be 21.5'. This
requires a side setback of 7' per 4.9(D)(6)(d). The setback distance isn't shown on the site
plan, but it scales to less than 7'.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: label the finished grade line on the elevations.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: General note #13 on the site plan needs to be removed. It doesn't apply to this
project.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: The applicant's conceptual review response letter indicates that the 14' front
building setback matches the existing contextual setback. Documentation will be needed
verifying the front setback of one or both of the buildings on abutting lots.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Peter Barnes, 970.416.2355, Rbarnes a@fcgov.com
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: The parking stall depth for residential parking needs to be a minimum of 18'. This
distance can be reduced to 16' if the space overhangs a minimum 6' wide landscape area
(Sec. 3.2.2(L)(4)). The site plan shows 16' deep stalls, but doesn't dimension the width of the
landscape setback. Putting a scale on the drawing, the setback is less than 6% meaning the
stalls would need to be Win depth.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: Label the surface material of the parking lot (asphalt or concrete).
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/26/2012
11/26/2012: New 6' privacy fence is labeled along north lot line. A similar fence is required
along the south lot line for the parking area. A fence appears to be shown on the plan. Please
label the height of the fence and whether its new or existing.
~. the back portion of the site will receive water quality through an extended detention area.
4. The Arthur Irrigation Ditch crosses the property. All improvements must be 10 feet away from both
sides of the ditch. If you have questions concerning the ditch contact the President, Mark Taylor at
416-2494 or mtaylor@fcgov.com. He must approve the construction plans prior to Stormwater approval
of the plans.
Response: An easement has been created for the Arthur Irrigation Ditch.
5. The city wide Stormwater development fee (PIF) is $6,390.00/acre ($0.1467/sq.ft.) for new impervious
area over 350 sq.-ft., and there is a $1,045.00/acre ($0.024/sq.ft.) review fee. No fee is charged for
existing impervious area. These fees are to be paid at the time each building permit is issued.
Information on fees can be found on the City's web site at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investment-development-fees or
contact Jean Pakech at 221- 6375 for questions on fees. There is also an erosion control escrow
required before the Development Construction permit is issued. The amount of the escrow is
determined by the design engineer, and is based on the site disturbance area or a minimum amount in
accordance with the Fort Collins Stormwater Design Criteria.
Response: Acknowledged
6. The design of this site must conform to the drainage basin design of the Old Town Master Drainage
Plan as well the City's Stormwater Criteria Manual.
Response: Acknowledged
7. At the conceptual review meeting a new drawing was shown that proposed parking over the Arthur
irrigation ditch which is a concern for the ditch company. Also during a site visit it was noted that there is
a concrete slab crossing diagonally across the property. That is the top of the ditch so it is easy to
locate. The concern is that the ditch is not structurally sound enough to carry continuous automobile or
especially truck traffic loads. Either the ditch will need to be replaced with a box culvert or a structural
engineer needs to certify that it is structurally sound to take the loads. It is the experience of the Ditch
Company that the ditch section cannot take the traffic loads which is why many street crossings of the
ditch have been and are being replaced.
Response: The parking lot over the ditch section has been removed.
8. Also during the site visit I noticed that the storm drain in the alley that discharges into the Arthur Ditch
is taking flow from an inlet to the south at the alley intersection and even though the pipe flow is to the
north, the surface of the alley flows to the south. I don't think this storm drain will be useful to this project
even if it was allowed since the alley it the high side of the development site. (Discharges of runoff into
irrigation ditches has not been allowed since 1984)
Response: Through conversation with Mark Taylor, he has allowed us to discharge continuated runoff from the
on -site detention pond to the existing inlet structure.
Department: Park Planning
Contact: Craig Foreman, 970-221-6618, cforeman@fcgov.com
1. 1.9/28/12: No comments
Department: Historical Preservation
Contact: Josh Weinberg, 970-221-6206, jweinberg(Mcgov.com
1. In May 2012, this property was reviewed for its eligibility for Landmark designation by the CDNS Director
and LPC Chair, per Municipal Code Section 14-72. The property was not found to be eligible for
�Afflq
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970.221.6501, tsiegmundCcilfcgov.com
1. Ladmer County Road Impact Fees and Street Oversizing Fees are due at the time of building permit.
Please contact Matt Baker at 224-6108 if you have any questions.
Response: Acknowledged.
2. The City's Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF) is due at the time of submittal. For additional
information on these fees, please see: hftp://www.fcqov.com/engineering/dev-review.pho
Response: Acknowledged.
3. Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks,
curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced
or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of
completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Response: Acknowledged.
4. Please contact the City's Traffic Engineer, Joe Olson (224-6062) to schedule a scoping meeting and
determine if a traffic study is needed for this project. In addition, please contact Transportation Planning
for their requirements as well.
Response: Ward Stanford was contacted and a traffic study will not be required for this project.
5. Any public improvements must be designed and built in accordance with the Larimer County Urban Area
Street Standards (LCUASS). They are available online at:
hfti)://www.ladmer.org/engineedng/GMARdStds/UrbanSt.htm
Response: Acknowledged.
6. This project is responsible for dedicating additional right-of-way and easements that are necessary for
this project.
Response: No Additional ROW is required along Meldrum
7. Construction plans will be required.
Response: Acknowledged.
8. A Development Agreement is required and will be recorded once the project is finalized with recordation
costs paid for by the applicant.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970.221-6501, tsiegmund(Mcgov.com
9. A Development Construction Permit (DCP) will need to be obtained prior to starting any work on the site.
Response: Acknowledged.
10. Depending on the existing condition of the alley behind and adjacent to the property, alley
improvements may be required with the project. A site meeting can be scheduled to determine if alley
improvement will apply.
Response: Acknowledged.
11. LCUASS parking setbacks (Figure 19-6) may apply depending on the design of the parking in the rear of
the lot off of the alley. Contact me for more information
Response: The building is 2 stories
9. All exterior walls of a building that are greater than six (6) feet in length shall be constructed parallel to or at
right angles to the side lot lines of the lot whenever the lot is rectilinear in shape.
Response: Acknowledged.
10. The primary entrance to a dwelling shall be located along the front wall of the building, unless otherwise
required for handicap access. Such entrance shall include an architectural feature such as a porch, landing
or portico.
Response: All units have recessed entries with 1-story porch roof elements.
11. Accessory buildings and attached garages shall have a front yard setback that is at least ten (10) feet
greater than the front setback of the principal building that is located on the front portion of the lot.
Response: Acknowledged.
12. A second floor shall not overhang the lower front or side exterior walls of anew or existing building.
Response: Acknowledged.
13. Front porches shall be limited to one (1) story, and the front facades of all single- and two-family dwellings
shall be no higher than two (2) stories, except for carriage houses and accessory buildings containing
habitable space, which shall be limited to one and one-half (1'/2) stories.
Response: All units have recessed entries with 1-story porch roof elements.
14. The minimum pitch of the roof of any building shall be 2:12 and the maximum pitch of the roof of any
building shall be 12:12. Additionally, the roof pitch of a dormer, turret or similar architectural feature may
not exceed 24:12 and the roof pitch of a covered porch may be flat whenever the roof of such a porch is
also considered to be the floor of a second -story deck.
Response: Minimum roof slope on project is 3:12 pitch.
15. The exterior eave height of an eave along a side lot line shall not exceed thirteen (13) feet from grade for a
dwelling unit located at the rear of the lot or an accessory building with habitable space.
Response: Does not apply to this project.
16. If a second story has an exterior wall that is set back from the lower story's exterior wall, the eave height
shall be the point of an imaginary line at which the upper story's roofline (if extended horizontally) would
intersect with the lower story's exterior wall (if extended vertically). (See illustration contained in Division
4.7.)
Response: Does not apply to this project.
17. A maximum of forty (40) percent of the front yard of a lot may be covered with inorganic material such as
asphalt or cement concrete, paving stone, flagstone, rock or gravel.
Response: Acknowledged.
18. In the N-C-B Neighborhood Conservation Buffer District, permanent open off-street parking areas shall not
be located any closer to a public street right-of-way than the distance by which the principal building is set
back from the street right-of-way. This provision shall not be construed to preclude temporary parking in
driveways.
Response: Acknowledged. Does not apply to this project.
19. Whenever a lot has frontage along an alley, any new off-street parking area located on such lot must obtain
access from such adjoining alley; provided, however, that such alley access shall not be required when a
new detached garage is proposed to be accessed from an existing driveway that has a curbcut along a
public street, or when alley access is determined by the City Engineer to be a hazard to persons or
vehicles.
Response: Acknowledged. We don't have this condition.
ram -
Response: Acknowledged.
31. When you are ready to submit your formal plans, please make an appointment with Community
Development and Neighborhood Services at (970)221-6750.
Response: Acknowledged.
Pre -Submittal Meetings for Building Permits
Pre -Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the
design, that the new commercial or multi -family proiects are on track to complying with all of the
adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to
mid -design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current
Planning conceptual review meeting.
Applicants of new commercial or multi -family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a
pre -submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and
elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of
construction being proposed.
Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended:
2009 International Building Code (IBC)
2009 International Residential Code (IRC)
2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2009 International Mechanical Code (1MC)
2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2009 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2011 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI Al 17.1-2003.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load:100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use
1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2009 IRC Chapter 11 or 2009 IECC Chapter 4
2. Multi -family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2009 IECC Chapter 4.
3. Commercial and Multi -family 4 stories and taller: 2009 IECC Chapter 5.
Fort Collins Green Code Amendments effective starting 1-1-2012. A copy of these requirements
can be obtained at the Building Office or contact the above phone number.
City of Fort Collins
Building Services
City of
'Oev
December 05, 2012
Cathy Mathis
The Birdsall Group
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: Big Deal Four Plex, PDP120030, Round Number 1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6760
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgo v. com/developmentreview
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your
submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the
individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126
or jholiand@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224.6126, jhollandbfcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: You may want to consider further emphasizing the entrance porches, possibly by
changing the roof material to metal to make these areas more distinct.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
The drive isle appears to be 23 feet wide, 24 feet is the standard dimension.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: You may want to consider plant choices along the front sidewalk in addition to
Avena Grass, such as Bouteloua gracilis'Blonde Ambition' or a muhly grass. Possibly two
Joint Fir flanking the entrance at the street sidewalk could be interesting.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970.221.6501, ti2gmund _fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: 3. The cross -sections provided on sheet C3 are both labeled A -A but the plan
references cross-section B-B. Also, please show the property lines in relation to the proposed
retaining walls to clarify that the walls do not encroach on the properties to the north and south.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970.221.6501, tsieamund fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: A temporary construction easementlagreement from the adjacent property owners
will be required for the concrete retaining wall construction on the north and south property
lines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Arthur Ditch representatives will need to review and sign the utility plans
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The existing sidewalk along the frontage of the property does not currently meet
our minimum sidewalk width requirements for a residential local street. If 50 percent or more of
the existing sidewalk is removed or damaged as part of the construction of this project then a
new 4.5 foot wide sidewalk will be required with the developer responsible for the costs
associated. Please add a note referencing this to the plans.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: There are concerns about the proposed roof drain on the south side of the
property that extends into the right-of-way and daylights into the curb and gutter. Please
provide more information about the proposed depth of this roof drain in the right-of-way or
redesign to terminate the drain at the back of sidewalk and run the water through a sidewalk
chase and channel to the curb and gutter
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: You are showing approximate asphalt patching limits on sheet C1, please add our
street cut note to all sheets that show approximate patching limits.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please update General Note #5
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12104/2012
12/04/2012: Please revise General Note #34 to reference the City of Fort Collins
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Construction details were not included with this submittal
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Proposed utility plan and profiles were not included with this submittal.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Please add our Site Distance Easement Restrictions language to the plat- contact
me for an updated copy of this language.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Easements dedicated on the plat need to be locatable. The site distance
easement dimensions are not clear.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Arthur Ditch representatives will need to sign the plat.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970.221.6501, tsiggmundAfcgov-com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The current standard for utility easements along alleys are 8 feet wide. See
LUCASS figure 7-11 F.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 1210412012
12/04/2012: Please add our standard note to the plat -"There shall be no private conditions,
covenants or restrictions that prohibit or limit the installation of resource conserving equipment
or landscaping that are allowed by Sections 12-120—12-122 of the City Code."
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224.6143, lex ,,fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/30/2012
11/30/2012: No comments.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416.2869, ilynxwiler _aoudre-fire.ora
Topic: General
Comment Number: 01 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION
Address numbers shall be visible from the street fronting the property, plainly visible, and
posted with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting background.
2006 International Fire Code 505.1
Comment Number: 02 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: BALCONIES AND DECKS
Sprinkler protection shall be provided for exterior balconies, decks, and ground floor patios of
dwelling units where the building is of Type V construction.
2006 International Fire Code 903.3.1.2.1
Comment Number: 03 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: KEY BOXES REQUIRED
Poudre Fire Authority requires at least one key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in approved
location(s) on every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler or fire alarm system.
The top shall not be higher than 6 feet above finished floor.
2006 International Fire Code 506.1 and Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Policy 88-20
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamaraueffcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: Is the piping that drains the roof sized for the 100-yr storm.
i
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The retaining walls look toy be in conflict with existing trees that are located on
adjacent properties and may compromise the health of these.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: A pld with an underdrain may be the best treatment for the water quality pond.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, jcountypfcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: We are suggesting that the Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to
change.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: We are suggesting that the Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to
change.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: The sub -title should match the Subdivision Plat.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: The descriptions of benchmark CSU2 on sheets C0.00 & C0.01 do not match the
published City of Fort Collins Vertical Control Network description.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: There are line over text issues on sheets C1.00, C2.00 & C3.00.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/04/2012
12/04/2012: The project name does not match the Subdivision Plat. We are suggesting that the
Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to change.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: There are line over text issues.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: There is a text over text issues.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 12/05/2012
12/05/2012: We are suggesting that the Subdivision Plat name change, so this may need to
change.
Topic: Plat