Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNEW BELGIUM BREWERY FOURTH LIQUID CENTER ADDITION - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2016-05-18Crail rt ins October 27, 2015 Paul Mills RUSSEL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVENUE Fort Collins, CO 80524 Community Developmentand Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6760 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentrevie w RE: New Belgium Brewing Liquid Center Expansion, MA150091, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ali van Deutekom, at 970-416-2743 or avandeutekom@fcgov.com. Department: Planning Services Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tthgpard0ffegov.com_ Topic: General Comment Number: 1. Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: Has the tree mitigation on sheet LD 101 been approved by the City Forester? Has it been determined that the Ginnala Maple needs zero mitigation? And, for the. White Ash, the mitigation does not specify the size of the mitigation tree. Given the issues with the Emerald Ash Borer, what is the species of the mitigation tree? - The tree mitigation chart was approved during the Office Expansion minor amendment. We inventoried all of the trees during the same appointment. There are no mitigation trees required. LD101 sheet title has been changed to "Tree Protection and Removal Plan". The Ginnala Maple is in "fair —" condition, so we determined that it does not require any mitigation trees. The White Ash is to remain, so we are not specifying a mitigation tree. Comment Number: 2. Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: On sheet LD 101, the tree mitigation chart is confusing. For trees that are to be protected, there is a column that indicates a mitigation amount. - The tree mitigation chart is organized the same way as the Office Expansion minor amendment was. Tim still stated the amount of tree mitigation during our inventory, even if that specific tree is to be remained, for reference. Comment Number: 3. . Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: On Sheet LP 001, the Landscape Schedule does not indicatewhich trees are the mitigation trees. - There are no trees to be mitigated. LD101 sheet title has been changed to "Tree Protection and Removal Plan". Page 1 of 4 Re uired Action Maintenance Objective Frequency of Action Inspect the downspout and basin to ensure the system functions as it was Routine Inspections designed. Repair or replace damaged downspouts as needed. Routine -just before annual storm seasons (i.e., Sediment, Debris Remove debris and litter from the basin. April/May); at the end of storm season after leaves and Litter removal Remove sediment from the sump. have fallen; and following significant rainfall events. Perforated Subdrain Maintenance Plan The perforated subdrain system storm drain outfall at the bottom of the Modular Block Paver (MBP) system is critical to the overall function of the paver subbase. As such, special maintenance has been identified to ensure these perforated drain systems perform as they were designed. Perforated subdrains leading away from the MBP system is designed to provide faster release of water when accumulation occurs under the MBP system. Outflow should be seen into downstream storm boxes. if not seen it is recommended that the system is inspected using a video camera to verify no clogging has occurred. Perforated subdrains leading toward the MBP system are designed to provide an opportunity for infiltration. These subdrains often lead to a drywell where additional infiltration capacity is available to reduce runoff per the stated LID goals adopted by the City. Routine Maintenance Table Required Action Maintenance Objective Frequency of Acaon Use a video camera to inspect the condition of the perforated drain pipes. Inspection Cleanout pipes as needed. If the integrity Every two to five years. of the pipe is compromised, then repair the damaged section(s) Where accessible, expose inlet and/or Inspection outlet of perforated pipe and watch for Minimum Annually water inflow and/or outflow. 11 Storm Dr^in Linec Maintenance Plan The storm drain lines are located in proximity to trees. The situation is unavoidable; therefore, special maintenance has been identified to ensure these storm drain systems perform as they were designed. Routine Maintenance Table Required Action Maintenance Objective Frequency of Action Use a video camera to inspect the condition of the storm drain pipes. Inspection Cleanout pipes as needed. If the integrity Every two to five years. of the pipe is compromised, then repair the damaged sections . Dry Extended Detention Basin Routine Maintenance Table (Summary from Table EDB-1, Chapter 6 of UDFCD) Required Action Maintenance Objective Frequency of Action Occasional mowing to limit unwanted Lawn mowing and vegetation. Maintain irrigated turf grass as Routine - Depending on aesthetic requirements. Lawn care 2 to 4 inches tall and non -irrigated native turf grasses at 4 to 6 inches. 12 Sediment, Debris and Litter removal Remove sediment, debris and litter from the entire pond to minimize outlet clogging and improve aesthetics. Routine - Including just before annual storm seasons (that is, April and May), end of storm season after leaves have fallen, and following significant rainfall events. Non -routine - Performed when sediment accumulation occupies 20 percent of the WQCV. Major Pond Remove accumulated sediment from the This may vary considerably, but expect to do this Sediment removal bottom of the basin. every 10 to 20 years, as necessary per inspection if no construction activities take place in the tributary watershed. More often if they do. Inspect basins to insure that the basin continues to function as initially intended. Routine - Annual inspection of hydraulic and Examine the outlet for clogging, erosion, structural facilities. Also check for obvious Inspections slumping, excessive sedimentation levels, problems during routine maintenance visits, overgrowth, embankment and spillway especially for plugging of outlets. integrity, and damage to any structural element. Bioretention/Bioswale Routine Maintenance Table (Summary from Chapter 6 of UDFCD) Required Action Maintenance Objective Frequency of Action Occasional mowing of grasses and weed Lawn mowing and removal to limit unwanted vegetation. Routine - Depending on aesthetic requirements, vegetative care Maintain irrigated turf grass as 2 to 4 planting scheme and cover. Weeds should be inches tall and non -irrigated native turf removed before they flower. grasses at 4 to 6 inches. Remove debris and litter from bioretention area and upstream concrete forebay to minimize clogging of the sand media. Remove debris and litter from the pond area and outlet orifice plate to Routine - Including just before annual storm Debris and litter minimize clogging. Remove debris and seasons and after snow season (April or May), end removal and snow litter from curb channel and sidewalk of storm season after leaves have fallen, and stockpiling chase outlets adjacent to pond if following significant rainfall events. applicable to minimize clogging. Avoid stockpiling snow in the bioretention area to minimize clogging from sediment accumulation. Inspect detention area to determine if the sand media is allowing acceptable infiltration. If standing water persists for Routine - Biannual inspection of the hydraulic Inspections more than 24 hours after storm runoff has performance. ceased, clogging should be further investigated and remedied. 13 Non -routine - Performed when clogging is due to the migration of sediments deep into the pore Growing media Restore infiltration capacity of spaces of the media. The frequency of replacement bioretention facilities. replacement will depend on site -specific pollutant loading characteristics. 14 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO JUNE 16, 2006, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND NEW BELGIUM BREWING COMPANY INC THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of October, 2015, by and between the CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City"; and NEW BELGIUM BREWING COMPANY INC., a Colorado Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer." WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, the City entered into a Development Agreement with the Developer on June 16, 2006, the terms of which govern the development activities of the Developer pertaining to that certain real property situated in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado, (hereafter referred to as the "Property") and legally described as follows, to wit: Lot 1 of New Belgium Brewery Fourth Filing, City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado. WHEREAS, the Development Agreement was amended by Amendment Agreement No. 1 on December 24, 2008, by Amendment Agreement No. 2 on January 2, 2012, and by Amendment Agreement No. 3 on June 27, 2012. WHEREAS, the parties presently desire to again modify the Development Agreement by this Amendment Agreement No. 4; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises of the parties hereto and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement as follows: A. Subheading II (Special Conditions) Paragraph C. L(c) shall be added as follows: (c) All on -site and off -site storm drainage improvements associated with the Office Addition for this Development, as shown on the Final Development Plan Documents, shall be completed by the Developer in accordance with said Final Development Plan Documents prior to the issuance any certificate of occupancy. Completion of improvements shall include the certification by a professional engineer licensed in Colorado that the drainage facilities which serve this Development have been constructed in conformance with said Final Development Plan Documents. Said certification shall be submitted to the City at least two weeks prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy in this Development. B. Subheading II (Special Conditions) Paragraph C.2 shall be replaced in its entirety as follows: 2. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining the structural integrity and operational function of all drainage facilities constructed as part of this Development including, but not limited to, all drainage facilities and water quality features, extended detention water quality basins, bioretention facilities and/or permeable pavement systems. These drainage facilities and/or features must be maintained in their original operational integrity throughout the build -out of this Development, following the completion of the construction of said facilities and features, and after acceptance of said facilities and features as certified to the City. If at any time following construction and certification (as required pursuant to Paragraph II.C.1 above) or during the construction of additional structures and/or lots within this Development, the City determines that said drainage facilities and features no longer comply with the Final Development Plan Documents, the City must give written notice to the Developer of all items that do not comply with the Final Development Plan Documents and request the restoration of the drainage facilities and features back to the function, standards and specifications designed and specified in the Final Development Plan Documents. Failure to maintain the structural integrity and operational function of said drainage facilities and features following certification will result in the withholding of the issuance of additional building permits and/or certificates of occupancy and, in addition, the City may avail itself of any other legal remedy that may be provided in the City Code, the Land Use Code and/or this Development Agreement until said drainage facilities and water quality features are repaired and restored to the physical characteristics, operational function and structural integrity originally specified in the Final Development Plan Documents approved by the City for this Development. C. Subheading II (Special Conditions) Paragraph C.4 shall be replaced in its entirety with the following: 4. It is important that all lots be graded to drain in the configuration shown on the Final Development Plan Documents. For this reason the following requirements shall be followed for all buildings/structures on all lots: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any lot or building the Developer shall provide the City with certification that the lot and/or the building has been graded correctly. This grading certification shall demonstrate that the lot or building finish floor elevation has been built in accordance with the elevation specified on the Final Development Plan Documents. The certification shall also show that the minimum floor elevation or minimum opening elevation for any building constructed is in compliance with the minimum elevation as required on the Final Development Plan Documents. The certification shall demonstrate as well that any minor swales adjacent to the building or on the lot have been graded correctly and in accordance with the grades shown on the Final Development Plan Documents. The certification shall also show that the elevations of all corners of the lot are in accordance with the elevations shown on the Final Development Plan Documents. Said certification shall be completed by a Colorado licensed professional engineer and shall be submitted to the City at least two weeks prior to the requested date of issuance of the applicable certificate of occupancy. 101 D. Subheading II (Special Conditions) Paragraphs C.6 and 7 shall be replaced in their entirety as follows: 6. The Developer shall be responsible for maintenance of all storm drainage facilities that are constructed outside of the public right-of-way per the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) contained in Exhibit E. 7. The drainage design for this Development provides for the evacuation of storm drainage runoff in a reasonable amount of time through a bioretention facility and into the drainage outfall system. The facility has been designed to discharge stormwater runoff from frequent storms over a 12-hour period. Under the intended operation of the facility, there will not be standing water in the pond more than 24 hours after the end of a rainfall event. If after construction and acceptance of the facility associated with this Development, surfacing or standing water conditions persist; and if such conditions are beyond what can be expected in accordance with the approved stormwater design, the Developer shall promptly, upon such discovery, take appropriate action in order to return the facility to the designed operation per the Final Development Plan Documents. E. Subheading II (Special Conditions) Paragraphs C. 9 and 10 shall be added as follows: 9. The Developer agrees to provide and maintain erosion and sediment control improvements for the Office Addition as shown on the Final Development Plan Documents until all disturbed areas in and adjacent to this Development's construction activities are stabilized. The Developer shall also be required to post a security deposit in the amount of $9,870.75 (nine thousand eight hundred and seventy dollars and seventy-five cents) prior to beginning construction to guarantee the proper installation and maintenance and, upon completion, removal of the erosion and sediment control measures shown on the Final Development Plan Documents. Said security deposit(s) shall be made in accordance with the criteria set forth in the City's Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards ("Criteria"). If, at any time, the Developer fails to abide by the erosion control provisions of the Final Development Plan Documents or the erosion control provisions of the Criteria after receiving notice of the same or an emergency situation exists which would reasonably require immediate mitigation measures, then, in either event, and notwithstanding any provisions contained in Paragraph III.J to the contrary, the City may enter upon the Property for the purpose of making such improvements and undertaking such activities as may be necessary to ensure that the provisions of said plans and the Criteria are properly enforced. The City may apply such portion of the security deposit(s) as may be necessary to pay all costs incurred by the City in undertaking the administration, construction, and/or installation of the erosion control measures required by said plans and the Criteria. In addition, the City shall have the option to withhold building permits and certificates of occupancy, as stated in Paragraph III.D of this Agreement, as it deems necessary in order to ensure that the Developer installs, maintains, and ultimately removes the erosion and sediment control measures throughout the build -out of this Development. Upon stabilization of the disturbed areas, and upon the request of the Developer, the City will confirm that the site is stabilized 3 from potential erosion and sediment control issues from the construction activities and that all temporary erosion and sediment control measures used by the Developer are removed. In confirmation that the site is stabilized by the City any remaining portions of the security deposit shall be returned. 10. The drainage design for this Development provides for the evacuation of storm drainage runoff in a reasonable amount of time out of the water quality and detention facilities and into the drainage outfall system. The water quality and detention facilities have been designed to discharge stormwater runoff from frequent storms over a 40-hour period through a small diameter outlet. Under the intended operation of the water quality and detention pond, there will not be standing water in the pond more than 48 hours after the end of a rainfall event. If after construction and acceptance of the detention facilities associated with this Development, surfacing or standing water conditions persist in these facilities; and if such conditions are beyond what can be expected in accordance with the approved stormwater design, the Developer shall promptly, upon such discovery, install an adequate de -watering system in the detention facilities. Such a system shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to installation. F. Subheading II (Special Conditions) Paragraphs D.2.a — 2.e shall be replaced in their entirety with the following: 2. a. In accordance with Section 24-95 of the City Code the Developer is responsible for constructing the portion of Buckingham Street adjacent to the site prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City and the Developer had agreed to delay the construction of these improvements (Phase 2 Improvements) provided that a letter of credit was provided to the City to guarantee the completion of these improvements. A non -expiring letter of credit for $631,574.00 (issuance date of December 23, 2011) was provided to and is being held by the City available to cover the cost necessary to relocate or remove the John G. Coy Ditch ("Coy Ditch") outside of Buckingham Street; and to design and construct the Buckingham Street improvements, and the utility and storm drainage facilities made necessary by the improvements to the Development; and any outstanding design and permitting costs necessary to complete full approval needed in order to commence construction of Phase 2 improvements. This amount is further described and detailed on Exhibit "C". b. The dates in which the Developer has to complete the design, obtain approval by the owners of interest in the Coy Ditch and the City, and construct said Phase 2 improvements as identified in Amendment Agreement No. 3 have passed and shall be extended as identified below. The City has purchased an undivided 50% interest in the water right decreed to the Coy Ditch by the Larimer County District Court in Civil Action 320, decree dated April 11, 1882, with an appropriation date of April 10, 1865 ("Coy Ditch Water Right"). East Larimer County Water District (" BLCO") claims ownership of the other 50% of the Coy Ditch Water Right. The City has no plans to 4 transmit water within the Coy Ditch on the Property and is working with the Developer and ELCO regarding the abandonment and/ or removal of the ditch on the Property. C. The Developer shall have until December 31, 2015 to complete the design, obtain approval by the City, and construct said Phase 2 improvements. d. Should the Developer be unable to complete the Phase 2 Improvements by December 31, 2015 the City reserves the right to call the letter of credit on file with the City in order to have the improvements constructed. e. If the City calls the letter of credit, the improvements may then be constructed by the City or a third party utilizing the proceeds of the letter of credit. If the Phase 2 Improvements are constructed by the City or a third party, neither the City nor the third party shall be bound to complete the Phase 2 improvements by December 31, 2015. G. Subheading II (Special Conditions) Paragraph E shall be replaced in its entirety with the following: E. Natural Resources 1. The Developer agrees that, in order to comply with Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code, it must establish at least 0.32 acres of upland habitat in order to mitigate the loss of 0.16 acres of wetlands located in the project site. To meet this requirement, the Developer will provide the location on -site for the 2:1 wetland mitigation, a landscaping plan, an itemized budget, and a project timeline. 2. The Developer shall ensure that all landscaping with the 0.32 acres of upland habitat is properly maintained for a three (3) year period following construction thereof to ensure that the vegetation is fully established and has met the success criteria. The mitigation will be considered successful when: a. 0.32 acres of upland have been created and enhanced b. 80% of planted trees and shrubs are alive after three years c. It is dominated by desirable plant species d. It has a vegetation cover of at least 80% as determined by methods in number 5 below. e. No Colorado noxious weeds on List A maintained by the Colorado Department of Agriculture are present 3. The status and effectiveness of the vegetation shall be evaluated and the results reported to the City of Fort Collins Environmental Planner, Current Planning Department semi-annually for review. The first report each year shall include an update on weed management, planting and seeding schedules, and other site -specific conditions, and the second report shall include an overview of vegetative cover and composition, tree and shrub establishment, and other specific management issues or concerns. The first report is due between March 1 and June 1 of each year and the second report is due between October 1 and December 31 of each year. 4. The Developer shall provide to the City prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy an acceptable form of security (cash, letter of credit, etc.) to guarantee completion of the upland habitat landscape improvements. The Developer shall submit an estimate for such improvements for review and approval by the City. Said estimates of landscape improvements shall constitute plant material, labor costs, and irrigation system improvements. The required security shall be in an amount equal to 75% of the total amount of the approved estimate to be held until said landscape improvements are constructed, established, and accepted by the City. The City shall return the security to the Developer upon the Developer's installation of the landscape improvements and the City's acceptance thereof. If the upland habitat has not been established in accordance with the Final Development Plan Documents after the third year of monitoring, then the Developer shall promptly take such steps as are necessary with a written proposal of plans and timing to bring the upland habitat into conformance with the approved plans. If the Developer does not take action to bring the upland into conformance with the approved plans, the City shall use the security provided by the Developer to install said plans and improvements and the Developer forfeits any right to the security. 5. The areas of the Development that are planned to be seeded, shall be inspected jointly by the Developer and the City at least once per year for three (3) growing seasons or until determined by the City to be well established in accordance with the coverage specifications of this paragraph, whichever occurs first. Areas seeded in the Spring shall be inspected for required coverage each immediately subsequent Autumn not later than October 1 st. Areas seeded at any other time shall be inspected each immediately subsequent summer not later than August 1st. The required coverage for the first inspection shall be ten (10) viable live seedlings of the specified species per one square foot, or fifty percent (50%) coverage of the specified foliage as measured from five feet (5') directly overhead, with no bare spots larger than 1 square foot. At the time of the second growing season inspection, there shall be seventy-five percent (75%) foliage cover of the specified species planted as measured from five feet (5') directly overhead, and no bare spots large than one-half a square foot. No more than ten percent (10%) of the species noted on the site may be weed species as defined by Chapter 20, Article IV, Section 20-41 of the Code of the City. The Developer shall be responsible for weed and erosion control at all times. Determination of required coverage will be visual assessments and as needed, based on random transects each ten meters in length, randomly placed in representative portions of the seeded areas, with plant species or bare ground/rock/litter being noted every ten (10) centimeters along each transect. The Developer shall rework and reseed per original specifications any areas that are dead, diseased, contain too many weedy species, or fail to meet the coverage requirement at no additional cost to the City. 6. Fueling facilities shall be located at least one hundred (100) feet from natural body of water, wetland, natural drainage way or manmade drainage way. The fuel tanks and fueling area must be set in a containment area that will not allow a fuel spill to directly flow, seep, run off, or be washed into a body of water, wetland or drainage way. G Comment Number: 4. Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 t 10/21/2015: On Sheet LP 100, the Overall Planting Plan does not indicate which trees are the mitigation trees. - There are no trees to be mitigated. 1-13101 sheet title has been changed to "Tree Protection and Removal Plan". Comment Number: 5. Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: For the re -submittal, all I need are sheets L 100 and L 101. Or, an electronic review would suffice as long as there is a detailed narrative or phonecall that responds to the comments. - Noted. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, yJanLganbefAprM_aov--om Topic: General Page 2 of 4 7. The Developer shall delineate the Development's property boundary adjacent to all Limits of Development as defined by Article V, Section 5.1.2 of the Land Use Code, including the upland habitat mitigation area and the boundaries around existing trees that are to be undisturbed with orange construction fence prior to any type of construction, including overlot grading. H. All other terms and conditions of the Development Agreement (as amended by Amendment Agreement No. 1, Amendment Agreement No. 2, and Amendment Agreement No. 3) shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, except as expressly amended in this Amendment Agreement No. 4. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fourth Amendment the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: City Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy City Attorney THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, a Municipal Corporation By: Darin Atteberry, City Manager 7 DEVELOPER: NEW BELGIUM BREWING COMPANY, INC., a Colorado Corporation By: Christine Perich, Chief Executive Officer ATTEST: Danielle McLarnon, Chief Financial Officer STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LARIMER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by NEW BELGIUM BREWING COMPANY, INC. by Christine Perich as Chief Executive Officer and by Danielle McLarnon as Chief Financial Officer. Notary Public My Commission Expires: MA150091 New Belgium - liquid center expansion October 20, 2015 Engineering Comments Standard note #19 is missing from the General notes. Based on the submitted drawings a DCP will not be needed (DCP determination is based on the value of the public infrastructure improvements), but an excavation permit along with the street cut fee will need to be obtained prior to installation of the sewer service and issuance of the building permit. Utility plan mylars and any amendment to the DA (if needed) will need to be completed before the minor amendment can be approved. -L Farnsworth GROUP October 26, 2015 City of Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 1612 Specht Point Road, Suite 105 Fort Collins, CO 80525 p 970.484.7477 f 970.484.7488 www.f-w.com I www.greennavigation.com RE: New Belgium Brewery Liquid Center Expansion, MA150091, Round 1 Comment Reply To City staff: Please review our responses (in blue) to the City provided comments for the New Belgium Brewery Liquid Center Expansion first submittal. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/20/2015 10/20/2015: Standard note #19 is missing from the General notes. Standard Note #19 has been added to the General Notes. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/20/2015 10/20/2015: Based on the submitted drawings a DCP will not be needed (DCP determination is based on the value of the public infrastructure improvements), but an excavation permit along with the street cut fee will need to be obtained prior to installation of the sewer service and issuance of the building permit. Noted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/20/2015 10/20/2015: Utility plan mylars and any amendment to the DA (if needed) will need to be completed before the minor amendment can be approved. Noted. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/27/2015 10/27/2015: It appears there are conflicting notes on sheets C4 & C7 regarding the area inlets in the area around the rolle bolle game. Please clarify inlet capping and replacing with pedestrian inlet grates. The notes have been changed for clarity. The inlet changes identified on the plans are correct. Comment Number: 5 10/27/2015: A "subdrain detail" is referenced in note 2 on sheets C7 & C8; however, this detail cannot be found on sheet CD1 as stated. "D1" has been added to the note and detail to improve clarity. The note references the "Subdrain Detail", within detail D1, on sheet CD1. ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS I SCIENTISTS Comment Number: 6 10/27/2015: Please add the finished floor elevation for the addition to the grading plan, sheet C6. Finished floor elevations have been added to the grading plan. Comment Number: 7 10/27/2015: Sheet C9.1 shows the storm water pipes to remain at 86' while the drainage report has indicated upsizing is required in some areas. Please review and update. The storm sewer has been increased to 12" on the plans. Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 3 10/27/2015: The net decrease in impervious area is noted to be 496sf. Please update the table in Appendix B to clarify the change in impervious area and what is shown in the table. The table has been color coded to clarify the changes in impervious area to the corresponding project. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/13/2015 10/13/2015: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (Has a minor redline to be addressed please see returned material), Erosion Control Report (I am ok with a letter outlining the changes from MA150059 office expansion/Beer Garden's Report as it is the same material just slightly amended with reguards to the location), and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com. A full erosion control plan for the LC has been completed and provided as part of the final drainage report. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcountv(cr-fcaov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Line over text issues have been resolved. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Line over text issues have been resolved. If you have any questions or concerns regarding these responses, please contact me at 970-484- 7477 or sturner@f-w.com. Sincerely, Scott Turner ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS I SCIENTISTS Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/20/2015 ?' 10/20/2015: Standard note #19 is missing from the General notes. -Standard Note #19 has been added to the General Notes. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/20/2015 10/20/2015: Based on the submitted drawings a DCP will not be needed (DCP determination is based on the value of the public infrastructure improvements), but an excavation permit along with the street cut fee will need to be obtained prior to installation of the sewer service and issuance of the building permit. -Noted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/20/2015 10/20/2015: Utility plan mylars and any amendment to the DA (if needed) will need to be completed before the minor amendment can be approved. -Noted. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Kimple, , imnle0fcgov.co_m Topic: General Comment Number: Comment Originated: 10/22/2015 10/22/2015: Mark Fischer, Angela Milewski, Rick Bachand, Jennifer Roberts, and Kelly Kimple met on Wednesday, August 26th to discuss 0.16 acres of wetland mitigation required for the office expansion and improvements along Buckingham. At this meeting, we had discussed having NBB take the next steps to draft a plan for mitigation of the 0.16 acres of wetland, on -site, with at least a 2:1 ratio of upland habitat to include fruit -bearing trees and shrubs, as well as flowering plants. Once drafted, we talked about then reviewing the landscaping plan and budget to see how we could tie the design into Nature in the City and/or an Audubon Habitat Hero garden. - This has been settled in the New Belgium Office and Beer Garden Expansion Minor Amendment. Attached are the associated documents. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/22/2015 10/22/2015: Environmental planning will need to receive the mitigation proposal for the 0.16 acres of wetlands onsite, as mitigation and monitoring plans are included with final plans and are the basis for comparison with the development agreement requirements. - This has been settled in the New Belgium Office and Beer Garden Expansion Minor Amendment. Attached are the associated documents. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jjynx_�.po�dre-fire.orn Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/23/2015 10/23/2015: PATH OF EGRESS The proposed pergola on the north side of the planned addition appears to cover the path of egress. Options are to construct the arbor of non-combustible materials along the path of egress, sprinkle a wood arbor along the path of egress, or remove the arbor along the path of egress. -Noted. Comment Number: 2 10/23/2015: EXIT GATE Comment Originated: 10/23/2015 Page 3 of 4 - Since the building's construction type is Type VB - we propose the pergola structure to remain constructed out of wood to match the balance of the structural system. To address the egress path protection, we propose the trellis be constructed of fire retardant treated lumber. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/23/2015 10/23/2015: EXIT GATE The man -gate exiting from the outdoor area is shown as swinging in. If the occupant load is to exceed 49 persons, the gate will be required to swing out and be equipped with appropriate exithardware. -The gate has been updated on the site and landscape plans. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/23/2015 10/23/2015: FIRE PITS Fire pits fueled by natural gas are allowed. Wood burning or smoke producing fire pits are prohibited. The plans indicate no wood products are planned on being burned. -Noted. Page 4 of 4 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, , dnignp S,gov_ c_ Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Originated: 10/27/2015 Comment Number: 4 10/27/2015: It appears there are conflicting notes on sheets C4 & C7 regarding the area inlets in the area around the rolle bolle game. Please clarify inlet capping and replacing with pedestrian inletgrates. -The notes have been changed for clarity. The inlet changes identified on the plans are correct. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/27/2015 10/27/2015: A "subdrain detail" is referenced in note 2 on sheets C7 & C8; however, this detail cannot be found on sheet CD1 as stated. -"D1" has been added to the note and detail to improve clarity. The note references the "Subdrain Detail", within detail D1, on sheet CD1. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/27/2015 10/27/2015: Please add the finished floor elevation for the addition to the grading plan, sheet C6. -Finished floor elevations have been added to the grading plan. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/27/2015 10/27/2015: Sheet C9.1 shows the storm water pipes to remain at 86" while the drainage report has indicated upsizing is required in some areas. Please review and update. -The storm sewer has been increased to 12" on the plans. Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/27/2015 10/27/2015: The net decrease in impervious area is noted to be 496sf. Please update the table in Appendix B to clarify the change in impervious area and what is shown in the table. -The table has been color coded to clarify the changes in impervious area to the corresponding project. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/27/2015 10/27/2015: Please expand Landscape Note 1 on LP001 to include separation requirements. No trees shall be planted with 10' of water and sewer mains or within 6' of service lines. No shrubs shall be planted within 4' of water and sewer mains or service lines. - The plans have been updated. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jggh1amQgov_ Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/13/2015 10/13/2015: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (Has a minor redline to be addressed please see returned material), Erosion Control Report (I am ok with a letter outlining the changes from MA150059 office expansion/Beer Garden's Report as it is the same material just slightly amended with reguards to the location), and Page 5 of 4 an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com -A full erosion control plan for the LC has been completed and provided as part of the final drainage report. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6688, j�o� tvCa�f-aov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 Comment Number: 1 10/21 /2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. - The plans have been updated. Page 6 of 4 Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: There are text over text issues. See redlines. -The plans have been updated. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. -The plans have been updated. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: No comments. -Noted. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: Please make changes to the legal description as marked. See redlines. - The plans have been updated. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: The titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the noted sheets. Please make changes as marked. See redlines. - The plans have been updated. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: Please tie the coordinate values shown to the project boundary. We would prefer that this be done by adding property corner values to each sheet, or showing the property corner values on a horizontal control plan and adding a noteto each sheet with coordinate values. - The plans have been updated. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/21/2015 10/21/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. - The plans have been updated. Page 7 of 4 EXHIBIT E STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOPS) A. Purpose In order for physical stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be effective, proper maintenance is essential. Maintenance includes both routinely scheduled activities, as well as non -routine repairs that may be required after large storms, or as a result of other unforeseen problems. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) should clearly identify BMP maintenance responsibility. BMP maintenance is typically the responsibility of the entity owning the BMP. Identifying who is responsible for maintenance of BMPs and ensuring that an adequate budget is allocated for maintenance is critical to the long-term success of BMPs. Maintenance responsibility may be assigned either publicly or privately. For this project, the privately owned BMPs shown in Section B below are to be maintained by the property owner, Homeowners Association (HOA), or property manager. B. Site-Spedflc SOPS The following stormwater facilities contained within this development are subject to SOP requirements: - Directly Connected Downspouts - Perforated Subdrain - Storm Drain Lines - Dry Extended Detention - Bioswale - Bioretention The location of said facilities can be found on the Utility Plans and Landscape Plans. Inspection and maintenance procedures and frequencies, specific maintenance requirements and activities, as well as BMP- specific constraints and considerations shall follow the guidelines outlined in Volume 3 of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. SOP Maintenance Summary Table Stormwater Facility / BMP Ownership / Responsibility UDFCD Maintenance Reference Directly Connected Downspouts Private Follow guidelines for Roof Gutters and Downspouts Perforated Subdrain Private Follow applicable guidelines for Perforated Subdrain Storm Drain Lines Private Follow guidelines for Storm Drains and Tree Roots Dry Extended Detention Private Follow guidelines for Extended Detention Basins Bioswale Private Follow guidelines for Bioretention Bioretention Private Follow guidelines for Bioretention The complete UDFCD BMP maintenance references listed above, except for the roof gutters and downspouts, can be found in Chapter 6 of Volume 3. Applicable BMP maintenance excerpts can be found at the end of this document. Directly Connected Downspouts Many of the downspouts connect directly to the storm drain system. The following SOP generally applies to all direct downspout connections, and more specifically to those which drain directly to the reservoir areas beneath the Modular Block Pavers. At each of these connections, the downspout discharges to a perforated drain basin. The drain basins discharge directly to the MBP reservoir. The drain basins are designed to prevent debris and sediment from entering the MBP reservoir area. Debris and sediment compromise the functionality and effectiveness of the system. Routine Maintenance Table for Directly Connected Downspouts 10