Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKECHTER FARM PLANNED LAND DIVISION FILING 1 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2016-05-18`Toll Brothers 0 October 22, 2015 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Kechter Farm Filing 1-Zero Lot Line Changes, MA150002, Round Number 3 response Comment summary response: Department: Planning Services Jason Holland, 970-224-6126 jholland(a�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number 1: 01 /22/2015 Comment Originated: 01/22/2015: Please be aware of notes 2, 3, and 5 on the approved landscape plans regarding tree separations from utilities and the City permitting / approval of street tree locations. One street tree is required per lot frontage as shown on the approved plans, and with the required separations between street trees, utilities and driveways. While the approved landscape plan provides notes that allow street tree adjustments in the field, the minimum of one street tree per lot must be provided. Due to the notes provided on the plan, an updated landscpae plan is not required, however, the applicant will likely find it beneficial to complete a driveway location plan/exhibit for their use so that they are certain the minimum street tree requirements can be met and approved in the field by the City Forester. Response: Tree separation noted and the one street tree requirement acknowledged and will be provided. We are in process of driveway locates on a per lot basis to meet the requirement. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, saangenberger@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number 1: Comment Originated: 01/14/2015 01/14/2015: Typically with zero lot line construction a public utility and drainage easement is required on the adjacent lot so that either the gas or the electric service can run across the neighboring property to provide service to this house and that drain spouts can drain onto the neighboring property. Private easements are also typically dedicated so a homeowner has the right and ability to get onto the Page 1 of 3 neighboring property to paint and maintain their home. The public easements (utility and drainage) will need to be dedicated to the City and can be done by separate document. Information on the cost and the process for this can be found at: http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php For the private easements that is something that the applicant prepares and records and then provides the City with a copy of the recorded document identifying that this was done and that these private maintenance easements exist. Response: The side yard easements for Lots 29-33 and 38-45 are shown to be 'PUBLIC UTILITY, DRAINAGE, ACCESS, MAINTENANCE, AND NO BUILD EASEMENTS.' These easements will be recorded with the County and will be a separate document for each lot. Comment Number 3: Comment Originated: 09/23/2015 09/23/2015: The new grading sheet needs to be numbered and labeled as a part of the original set. Please number it as sheet 44A of 141 sheets. The request is to build these as zero lot line, but several of the units are not shown to be placed up against a property line. Which line are they going to be abutting or if they are not why are they a part of the request. Have not shown anything for lot 26. The driveway on lot 36 over the ramp is an issue. The driveway needs to be moved so that it does not overlap with the ramp. Response: The grading sheet has been renumbered to be 44A of 141. Lot 26 is not part of this revision. The driveway for Lot 36 has been adjusted. The lots not being affected by the desired reduced/zero side yard setback (Lots 34 through 37) are shown for the proposed revised grading of single family homes, rather than the shared units originally approved. Comment Number 4: Comment Originated: 09/23/2015 09/23/2015: The way you have revised the existing grading plans is the way that we want to see this and have it done. Just add a note on the plans where you bubbled it that says 'See sheet 44A for grading in this area". Response: The note has been added to the original plan directing them to 44A. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: Easements Comment Number 3: Comment Originated: 01/16/2015 01/16/2015: Drainage easements will be needed on the lots adjacent to the zero lot line buildings. Please update and show easements. Response: Drainage easement has been added to the description Page 2 of 3 Topic: General Comment Number 2: Comment Originated: 01/16/2015 09/23/2015: Between lot drainage swales are still shown to run along the lot lines which is essentially up against the proposed homes (please see redlines). Please adjust swales to run in approximately the middle of the spaces between homes. 01/16/2015: Please provide updated grading plan showing drainage for these lots that will have a zero lot line. Response: Swale flow lines have been adjusted. Comment Number 4: Comment Originated: 09/23/2015 09/23/2015: Please include grading plan for Lot 26, which did not appear on the grading plan provided. Response: Lot 26 is not part of this revision. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number 1: Comment Originated: 01/13/2015 01/13/2015: No Comment from Erosion Control. This revision does not significantly affect the current erosion control materials. If you need clarification concerning this, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ ischlam _fcgov.com Response: None Required. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number 1: Comment Originated: 01/22/2015 09/23/2015: The Minor Amendment needs to include the changes on the site plan. 01/22/2015: The Minor Amendment does not redline the plat. The Minor Amendment is to the site and landscape plan. Please provide the revisions to these sheets and not the plat. Comment Number 2: Comment Originated: 01/22/2015 01/22/2015: Where are the necessary easements for zero setback? Response: (This is responding to both comments) No changes to the siteAandscape plan are being proposed. All tree location adjustments will be completed in reference to notes 2, 3, and 5 of the landscape plan. This revision should be considered a revision to the grading/utility plan rather than a minor amendment to the site plan. No plat adjustments are being proposed and the added easements within Lots 29 — 33 and 38 — 45 are to be recorded by separate document and should not affect the siteAandscape plan. Page 3 of 3 Ir