The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCAPSTONE COTTAGES - FDP - FDP150046 - CORRESPONDENCE -It Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On sheet L5.0 Please include street trees along Duff Drive. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On sheet L7.0 It is unclear where the sidewalk is on the northwest side of the round about. Is there a reason why there are not street trees near the round about? Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On sheet L10.0 Pleas include street trees along future Lemay Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: What is the landscape design for the center of the roundabout? Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On Sheet L8.0 There is a landscape island without a tree, please include a tree here. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The sheet index on the coversheet needs to include all the sheets not included in the Utility Plans. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The plat labeled a private street as need a name drive. Is there a name yet? Page 15 of 15 c Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Is there any signing and striping for the areas not including the roundabout? I may have missed it, but we'll need signing at the right in only off Lemay, etc. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Can you provide a brief design report related to the roundabout? It would be helpful to have a summary document that bullets the key components, ICD, R values, truck turning templates, etc. We'll have striping comments at the design meeting on Thursday. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/1312016: The sheet index doesn't match the sheets. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: What's the landscaping for the central island and splitters? Is itjust mulch? Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolsonMcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue(aD_fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: Please remove the label (City of Fort Collins) for the private sewer main for all the areas it is labeled. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: Please add the word "Private" for all the labels of the sewer main. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: The City recommends encasing the sanitary main where it crosses under another utility of 24-inches in size and larger. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Where is a handicap space close to the club house? Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The plans indicate that the porches are to be used for enclosed bikes space. Is this suppose to be all the porches? It does not seem that the porches are large enough. Page 14 of 15 r Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please add bearings, distances, and/or curve data as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please change the name & note for the "Minor Arterial" to the following. International Boulevard (Final Name To Be Determined By City Council By Resolution). Please use this exact wording. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please add dedication information for all street rights of way. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please clean up the fuzzy text in the Land Use Table. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document, must be added prior to producing mylars. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: All easements must be labeled & locatable. There is a 15' Utility Easement that does not scale 15'. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please change the name & note for the "Minor Arterial" to the following. International Boulevard (Final Name To Be Determined By City Council By Resolution). Please use this exact wording. See redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01 /12/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson(&-fcgov.com Topic: General Page 13 of 15 u Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are problems with the sheet numbering. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please change the name & note for the "Minor Arterial" to the following on all sheets showing the street. International Boulevard (Final Name To Be Determined By City Council By Resolution). Please use this exact wording. See redlines. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please tie the coordinate values shown for utilities to the project boundary. We would prefer that this be done by adding property corner values to each sheet, or showing the property corner values on the horizontal control plans and adding a note to each sheet with coordinate values. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are issues with matchlines. See redlines. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 01/14/2016 01/14/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 01/14/2016 01/14/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 01/14/2016 01/14/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 01/14/2016 01/14/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 01/14/2016 01/14/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 01/14/2016 01/14/2016: There are missing titles. See redlines. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 01/14/2016 01/14/2016: There is text that needs the size increased. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please change the name & note for the "Minor Arterial' to the following. International Boulevard (Final Name To Be Determined By City Council By Resolution). Please use this exact wording. See redlines. Page 12 of 15 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The areas of right of way (basins 2,3 ,6, 12) that drain into the wetland/detention basin are being proposed to have only a snout as pre treatment. This would not normally meet the requirement of pre treatment and a discussion needs to take place on options of adequate pre treatment. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please provide text in the draiange report on the specific detention design regarding the basins that are free releasing. Are the other basins being overdetained? Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On sheet 9, some additional revisions are needed to the drainage report. Please revise basin inconsistencies and remove the words preliminary. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please revise the text in the drainage report discussing the treatment train. Goals are good to have, but a more definitive explanation is required discussing if the development has met the LID requirements or not. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please include the City's LID table in the text of the drainage report. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Due to much of the LID treatment proposed on site not being sized or quantified, it is difficult to determine if the site is meeting the City's LID requirements. An internal meeting will be scheduled to determine if the site is meeting the criteria and what, if any, additional provisions will be required. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: There are areas on site where the rain gardens can be sized for the direct areas draining to them. Specifically basins 10, 13, and 14b. The routing for these basins is relatively straight forward and sizing calculations can show that these basins are meeting the LID requirements. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please complete the outlet structure detail on sheet C709. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please add the bio retention media specifications to the detail sheet. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please add the HGLs to the storm profiles. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty(cDfcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please add the title of "Capstone Cottages" to all sheets Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Page 11 of 15 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: For any multifamily units, it will be the responsibility of the developer/electrician to provide the service from the transformer to the meter. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01112/2016: Drawings show an electrical line along the north side of Lincoln, just south of the development. This needs to be double checked since our maps do not show any electrical on the north side of Lincoln, but rather on the south side. This could be telephone line since the drawings show telephone being feed in the area. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: If any existing electrical lines need to be relocated to accommodate the round -a -bout, modification charges will apply. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Street lighting and electrical design will be done for the existing Lemay Ave. Once the new Lemay Ave is installed, modification charges will apply for the relocation of street lighting and electrical infrastructure. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Distinguish between City street lighting and private lighting on the landscape drawings. Some proposed City street lights are missing from the drawings. Contact Todd Vedder if a copy is needed for proposed street lighting. Local residential streets shall have one light at each intersection. If the intersection lights would exceed 320 feet apart on a straight street, mid -block lights shall be added so lights do not exceed 320 feet spacing. If the street has a curve, judgment shall be used to reduce the spacing to less than 320 feet. Shade trees are required to maintain 40 feet of clearance with street lights and ornamental trees are required to maintain 15 feet of clearance with street lights. (clearances is from the trunk of tree to light) Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam(cDfcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015 12/28/2015: Erosion Control Report was acceptable. Erosion Control Plan will need some significant redline changes primarily based upon needing interior perimeter protection as proposed plans have shown through various other projects that not having interior perimeter protection on the site results in muddy messes almost impossible to control from being discharged to inlets. Please revise erosion control plan and calculate a escrow based upon the new changes to the erosion control plan. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque(Mcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On page 2 in the drainage report under paragraph 8, please document how the existing storm sewer has adequate capacity for the on site flows that will be added to the existing flows that are already conveyed by the storm sewer. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please revise some of the text on page 8 of the drainage report. Basin descriptions are inconsistent in describing where they will be detained. They reference between pond and paver system for detention is inconsistent Page 10 of 15 Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: CONTINUED 09/16/2015: CONTINUED Provide a final landscape plan for the round- about at final plan. Follow the requirements in the streetscape and median standards. Contact Clark Mapes in the Planning Department to obtain information on how the round- about will be reviewed by the City streetscape and median team 01 /14/2015: Will a landscape plan be provided for the round about? Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: CONTINUED 09/16/2015: Use the newly developed project landscape, tree protection and street tree notes. These notes are available from the Project Planner Pete Wray or the City Forester. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: Discovery Elm appears to be labeled as USD but in the plant list it is listed as USJ. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: Please provide information documenting why the 9 street trees along Lemay just to the north of the Bank of Colorado are behind the walk. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: The four street trees along the south side of Webster need to be labeled correctly. Please check and relabel. Department: Light And Power Contact: Todd Vedder, 970-224-6162, tveddenafcoov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: New development and system modification charges may apply. A link to our online electric fee estimator is below. http://www.fcgov. com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investment-de vel opment-fees/electri c-develo p ment-fee-estimator? id=3 Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Transformer and meter location needs to be coordinated with Light & Power. It is preferred to have the meters gained on one side of the building opposite from gas meters. Coordination is important since this is a congested site and power lines need to be separated by 10 feet from water lines and 3 feet from gas lines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: A C-1 form needs to be filled and a one -line diagram needs to be provided for the clubhouse in order to size the transformer properly. It is preferred to serve the clubhouse with single phase if possible. A link to a copy of our C-1 form is below. http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Please provide breaker panel sizing for each unit. Page 9 of 15 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: CONTINUED 09/16/2015: CONTINUED 01 /14/2015: This comment is continued from 5/29/14. If not already indicated show the location of stop signs with a defined symbol in the site plan legend. Adjust street tree locations to a distance of at least 20 feet from stop signs. 05/29/2014: Please show the locations of street lights and stop signs and adjust street tree locations as necessary. Street lights: 40 feet for shade trees and 15 feet for ornamental trees Stop signs: 20 feet for any tree Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: CONTINUED CONTINUED 9-16-15 01 /14/2015: Some street trees at the following locations appear to not be labeled as to species. Four street trees located at Duff Drive and North Club House Drive on n North Club House Drive. Some street trees located at the corner of Cottage Drive and International Boulevard. Some street trees located at Cottage Drive and North Club House Drive NE corner. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: CONTINUED 09/16/2015: CONTINUED Providing only drip irrigation to trees with no other irrigation to turf will not sustain street trees long term as they grow and mature. Providing spray irrigation to the turf in parkways appears the best way to provide for the future irrigation of City street trees in parkways. 01 /14/2015: Prairie Turf (Reduced Irrigation) is indicated in the perimeter parkways. Parkway turf needs to receive irrigation by a pop-up spray or equivalent system. This should be clarified by possibly describing it as Irrigated Prairie Turf. Providing for reduced irrigation in landscape areas is a great concept but the irrigation of street trees still needs to be adequately provided for. Significant reductions in turf irrigation would limit the growth and survival of street trees. Provide specific information on how irrigation with this concept will be adequate to establish and sustain street tree growth. Incorporate information and or design elements into the project design plan that clearly defines the level of irrigation that is needed and will be provided for the street trees. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/15/2016 01/15/2016: CONTINUED 09/16/2015: CONTINUED 01 /14/2015: Include 35 upsized mitigation trees on the project. Identify upsized mitigation trees in the Landscape Material Legend and by direct labeling of trees used as mitigation trees. Typically placing an asterisk with footnote by mitigation trees in the Landscape Material Legend and placing an M by those that are direct labeled has been an effective way to identify mitigation trees. Canopy Shade trees 3.0 inch caliper Ornamental trees 2.5 inch caliper Evergreen trees 8 feet height. Page 8 of 15 Comment Number: 620 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Carrying forward a PDP comment for reference in that the local street portion of Lemay adjacent to Tract G will be required with the project, similar to the local street portion (minus sidewalk) along the east side of realigned Lemay Avenue abutting the property. Comment Number: 525 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Carrying forward a PDP comment as unresolved, looking to have "Being Private Maintenance" informational signs at the entrances to the site off of the public streets. A detail should be added to the civil detail sheets, and their locations referencing the detail should be shown on the site/landscape and civil plans. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Kimple, 970-416-2401, kkimple(bfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/11/2016 01/11/2016: On all plans showing the mitigation wetland and associated buffer, please label more clearly to indicate the entire upland area around the wetland is the NHBZ. A logical boundary would be the gray -dashed existing stormdrain line. Please also provide a table of the area of the mitigation wetland, as well as the buffer. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/11/2016 01/11/2016: Please see redlines on landscape plans for replacing the non-native species with natives, specifically GSD, QSR, ASG, ARM, and some PSP. Also, the 17 SXE in the northwest corner appear to be mislabeled. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/11/2016 01/11/2016: As discussed, a mitigation and monitoring plan will need to be finalized to indicate how the wetlands will be installed and monitored to ensure success. This document will be attached to the development agreement. A letter of credit to ensure the wetlands and buffer can be replaced, should the success criteria not be met, will be required. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/11/2016 01/11/2016: What is the proposed seed mix for the wetland area? I will email a suggested mix, as well as a mix to replace the dryland seed mix that includes more forbes. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Thank you for providing a photometric plan with this PDP submittal and that no light spillage is shown within the buffer area. Please also consider the 3000K option for the light fixtures, in order to limit the amount of blue light in the night environment. Both LED and metal halide fixtures contain large amounts of blue light in their spectrum, and exposure to blue light at night has been shown to harm human health and endanger wildlife. Please also consider fixtures with dimming capabilities so that light levels can be adjusted as needed. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(a)fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Page 7 of 15 Comment Number: 266 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: I'm presuming a report on the parameters used for the design of the roundabout will be provided and further discussion will occur on the Thursday morning meeting. Turning templates for emergency and WB-50 vehicles should be provided in the report, and how does a WB-67 track through the intersection? Comment Number: 270 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The use of successive "curb on curb" for the medians on both ultimate Lemay and pertaining to the roundabout design isn't reflected in the cross sections, We'll want to ensure that this design is implemented as part of the City's streetscape design standards, including for the interior of the roundabout. Comment Number: 275 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The use of truncated dome detection for the roundabout design is evident along the roadway edges, but isn't depicted within the ped refuge/splitter islands. I'm presuming the intention is to have these in the splitter/refuge islands? Comment Number: 280 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: There are some general concerns with the location of manholes in relation to the public streets, such as for ultimate Lemay on C502 showing manoles in flowlines where the bikelane along Lemay would be, as well as against the median flowline. A manhole in the Lincoln flowline median is shown as well. We'll want to ensure that manholes aren't located in bikelanes, and aren't in conflict with median flowlines, either placed in the median, or in the middle of the adjacent travel lane. Comment Number: 290 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please ensure that the roundabout plans have the City Approval Block in the same manner as the "onsite" plans. Topic: General Comment Number: 500 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: A landscape plan for the medians pertaining to the roundabout (including approach medians) is needed. Comment Number: 505 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: With the roadway network internal to the development bring private, there isn't much purview through Engineering. That said, I'm curious to know why the two north -south roadway don't align with each other on the west side of Cottage Drive, and the implications behind no stop control being specified for this intersection (based on the lack of Stop Sign symbols for this intersection as depicted in the site plan). Comment Number: 510 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The placement of rain gardens within utility easements behind the right-of-way does not constitute Engineering approval for its placement, though the slope and material type immediately behind the public street sidewalks need to be verified for being gradual, and not a "hole" or with rough media behind the walk. I would question the implications on the integrity of the rain gardens being maintained over time with any utility installation work occurring in the future within the general utility easement. Comment Number: 515 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Will the general drainage design with permeable pavers be amended with the change in stormwater criteria? Page 6 of 15 Comment Number: 210 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The ultimate Lemay Avenue design shows the need for offsite easement to construct Lemay Avenue on the west side. This is just for reference to Engineering Capital for the future construction. Comment Number: 215 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Existing Lemay Avenue design with the interim right turn lane into a right only movement into the site needs to have a roadway design with grading, spot elevations, cross slopes of the new pavement against the existing, etc. Additionally, as signing and striping plan is needed, showing the new lane width against the existing, parameters used for taper and storage, radius for the right turn, etc. Comment Number: 220 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Intersection spot elevations are needed for the public streets intersections in accordance with Figure 7-27 and 7-28 of LCUASS. Comment Number: 225 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: It appears that Sheets C911 through C914 is profiling the centerline. Please add flowline plan and profiles as well. Ideally instead of profiling the centerline, there would be a flowline profile against both "flowlines" of the center median. Comment Number: 230 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Similar to #195, please have sheets C911 through C914 show (and label) existing and proposed contours. Sheets 915 and 916 should be showing this information as well with the indication of elevations on the sheet. Comment Number: 235 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On the striping plan for the roundabout, will the use of "fish hooks" for paint and/or striping be utilized? Comment Number: 240 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The cross sections for the roundabout should be showing flowline elevations for the outside edges of the roadway as well as both side of the center median, to cross check against the flowine design. Comment Number: 245 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: For the ties in points into existing Lincoln, it appears that the western edge tie in creating an angle point, whereas a radius is introduced on the eastern edge, which reduces the appearance of a kink in the roadway. I'd like to see a radius reflected on the western edge of the tie-in point on the south side of the roadway with existing curb and gutter. Comment Number: 250 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Please provide flow arrows to go along with the spot elevation on Sheets such as C908 to understand "the ride" of the vehicle utilizing the roundabout and its approaches. Also, the flow arrows help show how water drains and whether it directs to medians needing inlets, etc. Comment Number: 256 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: A subdrain system should be shown in the roundabout utility plan for the landscaping required in the roundabout. In addition irrigation line should be shown, and coordinated with City Parks for maintenance.. Comment Number: 260 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: A concrete joint pattern and reinforcement detail is needed for the concrete used for the roundabout and its approaches. Page 5 of 15 Comment Number: 180 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/1312016: On Sheet C516 a couple of thoughts regarding access ramps: - There's a ramp facing east on the south side of Cottage Drive and the minor arterial. I don't believe this is needed, as there's a crossing and a receiving ramp along the north leg of this intersection. - The access ramps on the south side of the Duff Drive/minor arterial intersection don't appear to align with each other across the minor arterial. - I'm wondering if there's an opportunity and support for an access ramp on the north leg of Webster Avenue/minor arterial intersection with a pedestrian refuge island midway through the splitter island? Perhaps this crossing negate the need for a crossing at the north side of the Cottage Drive/minor arterial intersection. Comment Number: 185 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On Sheets C517 and C518 also pertaining to access ramps: - Please ensure that at the southeast corner of the Buckingham-Duff/realigned Lemay intersection that an access ramp is built heading north, with a receiving access ramp at the northeast corner of this intersection. It would seem that this could be built in the ultimate condition today within the limits of the curb and gutter section for Buckingham -Duff. - The mid -block receiving access ramp on the north side of Buckingham -Duff doesn't appear to align with the access ramp/sidewalk on the south side. - The plans should indicate that the aforementioned receiving ramps along the north side of Buckingham -Duff being built now. The sidewalk on the north side isn't required with this project, (but can be built with this project) -- in its current iteration it is confusing to discern what is being built along the north side. - Sheet C518 should be showing at least the receiving access ramps along the north side of the Buckingham-Duff/minor arterial intersection. Sidewalk again along the north side isn't required, but would be nice; what is to be built north of the curb and gutter along the north side should be clarified. Comment Number: 190 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On the plan and profile sheets, please ensure that the profile lines use a heavier lineweight for the 0 and 5 foot elevations, it's difficult to verify elevations without the variation of lineweight at the major intervals. Comment Number: 195 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On the plan and profile sheets, please ensure that existing and proposed contours are shown and labeled in plan view. Comment Number: 200 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On the cross section sheets, please provide flowline elevations to cross check against the specified cross slope and the plan and profile sheets. Comment Number: 205 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The cross sections for Duff Drive show grading past the platted right-of-way for Duff Drive along the north and would require an offsite grading easement. Note that the right-of-way from STA 27+50 on is not depicted for the north side as well as the south side east of the new minor arterial. Offside grading easement might be needed for the south side of Duff Drive east of this property. Page 4 of 15 Comment Number: 140 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Sheet ST5's Storm Drain Line 8 shows less than the minimum cover required, and in general is the existing storm pipe that this line ties into, problematic with its elevation in relation to Lemay Avenue? Existing ground is higher than proposed as depicted on the profile view, with a cut occurring, though C502 shows a fill instead of a cut in this area. Is there a profile for this existing line shown in relation to finished grade along Lemay Avenue? C502 should be depicting this pipe under the roadway and illustrate whether the pipe itself is problematic with the ultimate Lemay improvements. Comment Number: 146 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: In general, it appears that much of the previous comments pertain to conflicts with existing water lines (and potentially an existing storm line as well). Given the reworking of Lincoln that will occur with the project, and the reworking of Lemay in the future, presumably by the City, I would be curious to understand whether some of the existing utility infrastructure should be modified and/or relocated, since the corresponding roadways will have similar realignment, which could better allow compliance with street standard cover requirements. Comment Number: 150 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The Lemay Avenue vertical design only included centerline profiles. Unless otherwise agreed to by Engineering Capital Projects, flowline designs should be provided. Comment Number: 156 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On Sheet C504, please change "future overpass" to "future potential overpass". I'm understanding that there is not necessarily a guarantee that the intersection will be an overpass vs. an underpass vs. an at -grade crossing. Comment Number: 160 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On C507, the sag K-value for the flowlines on Duff Drive fall short of the 60 value required for the collector classification. Comment Number: 165 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On C508, the crest K-value for the flowlines on the new minor arterial fall short of the 110 value required for the arterial classification. Comment Number: 167 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Duff and Webster existing flowlines and centerline with percent grades should be shown east of the property to show how proposed grades tie into existing. Comment Number: 170 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On C513, the access ramps crossing both sides of the drive aisle isn't normally where we would place access ramps mid -block. If still desired and okay to remain, there should be receiving ramps placed at the south side of the intersection. Comment Number: 175 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: As a carryover comment from PDP, on signing and striping plan sheets Sheet C514 through C518, please place dimensions all the components in the right-of-way (width of travel lanes, turn lanes, bike lanes, medians, parkway strips, and sidewalks). Also the parameters for taper and storage of turn lanes should be provided. Page 3 of 15 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: L7.0. Aterial Street medians and roundabout planting symbol is shrub beds. Need note to determine responsible party for planting these areas and details. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Add match line symbol in legend of all sheets. Distinguish match line from storm drainage line symbols better. All sheets, remove contour lines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: SP2. Add match lines and Index diagram. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6667, mvirata(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 100 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: On the paving plan sheet, please add a 6' reference for the sidewalk along Lincoln Avenue, and change the 5' to 6' reference for the minor arterial. Comment Number: 105 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: The Sheet Index shows Sheets C311-C316 and there are reference to these sheets in the plans, but sheets are labelled ST1-ST5 instead. Comment Number: 110 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: In general, there are some discrepancies on sheet numbers listed in the index and the as numbered. Also discrepancies exist on the legend map. Comment Number: 115 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Sheet ST1 shows the 48" RCP having less than the minimum cover needed across Webster Avenue, with a depth of less than 2'. If the concern is maintaining the 18" from the water line, perhaps twin pipes and/or and elliptical pipe can be explored to get additional cover from Webster. Comment Number: 120 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Sheet ST2's Storm Drain Line 1-2 appears to have a minimum cover issue across the to be named minor arterial (shows about 2.5' at its shallowest). The roadway above this crossing appears to be concrete per Sheet C910 as part of the approach for the roundabout, and subject to verification from our Director, I believe can be supported.. Comment Number: 125 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Sheet ST4's Storm Drain Line 3-3 has less than 2 feet of cover over the top of the roadway and is about 1.5 feet at its shallowest. While this area appears to be a concrete roadway, I'm concerned that at 1.5 feet, we may have depth concerns. Comment Number: 130 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Sheet ST4's Storm Drain Line 5 has at its shallowest about 1 foot of cover over the top of the roadway. I'm wondering if a waterline lowering should be explored here (and in other locations as it pertains to some of the other shallow crossing noted above). Comment Number: 135 Comment Originated: 01/13/2016 01/13/2016: Sheet ST5's Future Storm Drain Line 7 appears to be situated to have less than the minimum cover required (showing less than 2 feet), again due in part to maintaining 18" of clearance from an existing water line. Page 2 of 15 City of Fort Collins January 15, 2016 Linda Ripley RIPLEY DESIGN INC. 401 WEST MOUNTAIN AVE Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Capstone Cottages, FDP150046, Round Number 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6760 970.224.6134 - fax t6gov.com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray cDfcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Show plan with building types to correspond to elevations. Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Status of interim one-way lane connection to 10th. Street? Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: C303. Add transit stop pad and shelter facility. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: C505. For realigned Lemay at Duff intersection, remove interim paved lane connection to 10th. Street, and show how Buckingham is cut-off from access to neighborhood area near alley. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Grading Plan - between Maintenance building area and Tract D, show how drainage is not being directed to property line on east side. A Swale may be needed. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/12/2016 01/12/2016: Label match lines. Legend symbols do not match plan details on Sheet L1.0. Page 1 of 15