The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCSU ENV. LEARN. CENT. - SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 55-98 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYG iCS: Unsignalized Intersections Ralease 2.1d -page 1 =G='='L�LCpG33L�CGL3LLpLCL�OO�='CL��====3LRLL=''='===L"LL'GL='LLL=='L= :enter For Microcomputars In Transportation Jniv.:rsity of Florida ill Wail Hall ialnesville, FL 32611-2083 %h: (904) 392-0376 ._LLB �c LCLL�LLLLLaaaaLmaxmLLLLLLSLsaLLLLLLLLLLLLLOLIILLLLLLLLLLL6LCLL itroets: (N-S) frontage road (E-W) prospect 4ojor Street Direction.... EW .ungth of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) \rrdlyst................... mjd ic,te of Analysis.......... 3/3/97 )then Information......... am �m 1997 short A O Iwo -way Stop -controlled Intersection ; Eastbound ; Wastbound ; Northbound I Southbound L T R L T R L T k; L T k i---- --------;---- --------;---- --------i---- ---- ---- Jo. Lanes ; 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 ; 0 > 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 itop/Yield ; N; N; ; /olumes ; 54 720 17; 37 535 37; 32 6 261 48 6 106 W ; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95; .95 .95 .95 Trade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 4C's (2) W/Rv's 'CE's ; 1 . 10 1 1 . 10 ; 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10:1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors 'ehicle Critical Follow-up laneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (to Time (tf) .eft Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 :fight Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 hrough Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 .eft Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d page 2 L C CCLC6S S Worksheat for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street N8 Se Conflicting Flows: (vph) 758 563 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 572 716 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 572 716 Prob. of Queue-Frae State: 0.95 0.83 Step 2: LT from Major Street -- WB EB ----- ------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------------- 776 602 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 732 886 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 732 686 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ' -------------------------------------------------------- 0.94 0.93 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB j Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1456 1435 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 188 193 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.87 0.87 i Movement Capacity: (pcph) 164 169 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.96 0.96 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1476 1453 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 148 153 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.84 0.84 Adjusted Impadance Factor: 0.86 0.87 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.'3 0.03 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 107 127 Intersection performance Summary Avg. 95X Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach ' Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ----- ------ (veh) ------- ------- (sac/vah) NB L 37 107 > 113 51.8 1.9 ----- F --------- NB T 7 164 > 33.5 NB R 30 572 6.6 0.0 8 SB L 56 127 > 131 52.3 2.7 F S8 T 7 169 > Y1.7 SB R 123 716 6.0 0.7 B ES L 63 886 4.4 0.1 A 0.3 Wb L 43 732 5.2 0.1 B 0.3 Intersection Delay . 3.7 sec/veh HE tICS: Unsignalized Intersections kelaase 2.1d page ) -caacc sac-a=zcaza=caa=ace=ace=ac=a ac a=aaa=anaasaaaa==aa=c=zcaaaaPacana Center for Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 51? Weil Mall Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 _ a aaa=aac=zaaczeaeavaaca=aeccaacccaa=czaaeea acecaaaaaaeza=aeacaacaa=za Streets: (N-S) frontage road (E-W) prospect Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Arialyst................... mjd Data of Analysis........:. 3/3/97 Other Information....... ai pm 1997 shor A BO Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection a acaacsaccaaaccaaa=saaaaa=ccaa==a===a accz a cacaaaaacacaaaaacccaccaa=caa { Eastbound 1 Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R i---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1 1 l i t 1 1 1 0 > 1 1 1 0->-I-- ---- Stop/Yield 1 N1 N1 1 Volumes 1 89 385 161 21 625 461 18 6 151 20 6 38 F•HF 1 .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95 Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 MC's (t) SU/RV's (%)1 i CV•s (%) I 1 ! I PCE's 11.10 i1.10 11.10 1.10 1.10:1.10 1.10 1.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Maneuver ------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road Light Turn Minor (toad Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Critical Follow-up Gap (tg) Time (tf) ---------------------------- 5.00 2.10 5.50 2.60 6.00 3.30 6.56 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 2 ___=====a===aaaaac=ann aaaac==amq.c aaaaa=azanaacaaacaaa=caacca=caavcaaca Worksheet for TW6C Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: AT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 405 658 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 863 643 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 863 643 Prob. of Quaua-Free State: ------------------------------------------------------ 0.98 0.93 Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- Wg EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 422 706 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1079 790 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1079 790 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.98 0.67 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1227 1196 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 248 257 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.85 0.85 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 211 219 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 0.97 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1202 1214 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 213 210 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.82 0.82 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.66 0.86 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 0.05 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 171 176 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% ! Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach i kale Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------- (vah) (sec veh N6 L 21 171 > 180 23.7 ------- ----- 0.6 0 NB T 7 211 > 16.2 i NB k 18 863 4.3 0.0 A SB L 23 178 > 186 23.1 0.6 0 SB T 7 219 > 12.9 SB k 44 643 6.0 0.1 B EB L 103 790 5.2 0.5 8 1.0 WB L 24 1079 3.4 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay - 1.6 sac/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 ==cacIIIIIIcaccIIIIccIIaccccccccc mccIIIIacaac m cIIacaacIIIIccm acaacIIccIIccacccccc Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 =IIaaaaaIIaIIaaaaaaaaaaaaaapaaaaaaa=IIIIaaaaacIIIIIIIIasaaaasacIIIIIIaaaa==IIIIIIaa=IIa Streets: (N-S) frontage road (E-W) prospect Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 3/3/47 Other Information.......... m pm 1997 shor OA B Iwo -way Stop -controlled Interseon C L a C L II 3 C ...........0 a I Eastbound ; Wastbound ; Northbound ; Southbound L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R i L T R i____ --------i---- --------i ---- --------i---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1 1 < 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 1 Stop/Yield 1 N1 N1 ; Volumes ; 55 740 51 5 567 371 5 5 51 48 5 107 PHF .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95 Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 MC's (%) SD/RV's (%)1 ; CV's (%) 1 1 PCE's 11.10 11.10 11.10 1.10 1.1011.10 1.10 1.10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (if) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 kignt Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release '.Id Page 2 II_IIa=c_cIIacaa-c_c_ccII_cc_cccIIIIcc_cIIacccca______aa=_cIIaaIIca ccecIIc_IIcc_aa Worksheat for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street Nb SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 762 597 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 556 690 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 556 690 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.62 Step 2: LT from Major Street ---------------------------------- WB----------_Eb Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------- 784 636 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 725 653 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 725 853 Prot. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.92 Step 3: TM from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1480 1444 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 182 191 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.92 0.92 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 167 175 Prob. of Quaue-Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.96 0.97 Step 4: LT from Minor Street ----- - ------------------------------------------------- NB 56 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1500 1466 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 143 150 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.69 0.88 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.91 0.91 Capacity Adjustmen(. Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.75 0.90 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ------------------------------------------------------- 107 135 Intersection performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Lan9th LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ (veh) ------- (sec/veh) NB L 6 107 > ------- ----- --------- N8 T 6 167 > 175 22.9 0.3 D 22.9 Nis R 6 556 > SB L 56 135 > 138 46.9 2.4 F SB T 6 175 > 19.8 56 R 124 690 6.4 0.7 B EB L 64 853 4.6 0.2 A 0.3 WB L 6 725 5.0 0.0 B 0.0 Intersection Delay - 2.4 sec/veh MCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d page I :aaaaaacaaacaaaaaccacaaaac----=c----------- -" Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Wail Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 5trnets: (N-S) frontage road IE-W) prospect Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date. of Analysis.......... `/3/97 Other Information....... am pm 1997 short 6 B Two-way Stop -controlled Isection c_caacaca_cacccac_acc_ace=a_aa__ca_acaaacccaaacaacca_cccccac__aaccaacca I Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound ; Southbound i L T R ; L T R 1 L T k ; I. T F: 1____ ____ ____1____ ____ ____1____ ___ ____1____ No. Lanes 1 1 1< 0 ; 1 1 1 1 0 > 1 < 0 ; 0 7-_ ---_ Stop/Yield 1 N: N1 1 Volumes I 90 394 51 5 641 461 5 5 51 20 5 39 PHF ; .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .95 Grade 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Ml.'s (X) Sll/Rv's C V's (Y) p CE's 11.10 ;1.10 11.10 1.10 1.1011.10 1.10 1.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors vehicle 1laneuver ---------------------------- Left Turn Major Road RiNht Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Lett Turn Minor Road Critical Follow-up Gap (t9) Time (if) _____________________ -- 70--- 5.00 5.50 2.60 6.00 3.30 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsi9nalized Intersections Release 2.11d Page 2 _c=aa__aa_ac_a_aaa___aaa__aa_acaacc_c__aacc_c_aaaa_aaaacaa_aa___aca__aa Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB Se. Conflicting Flows: (vph) 416 675 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 650 6" Movement Capacity: (pcph) 650 630 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB E6 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 420 723 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1061 775 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1081 775 Prob. of Queue -Fran State: ____________________________________________ 0.99 0.86 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- -------- N8 SB Conflictinq Flows: (vph) 1240 1195 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 244 257 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impedinq Movements 0.86 0.86 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 210 221 Prob. of Queue -Free Stata: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 0.97 Step 4: LT from Minor- Street ________________________________________________________ NB S6 C->nflic Ling Flows: (vpli) 1216 1222 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 209 208 Major LT, Minor Th Impedance Factor: 0.64 0.84 A6jurte(1 Impedance Factor: 0.67 0.67 idpacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.6) 0.67 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 170 ISO Intersection performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ (veh) (sec/veh) N8 L 6 170 > _______ _______ _____ _________ NS T 6 210 > 254 15.3 0.1 C 15.3 NE. R 6 650 > 58 L 23 180 > 187 22.8 0.6 D 56 T 6 221 > 12.6 Sill R 45 630 6.2 0.1 B EB L 105 775 5.4 0.5 B 1.0 148 L 6 Iasi 3.3 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 1.2 sec/vah , HC:.: Unsigna I ized Intersections - keIease 2.Id Fage 1 =a=ccnn=cc=c====acc=ca=nna=ac=caa=a=c=c==ccccacacacc==cam c=caavacnnccc C.:nter For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Wail Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2063 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ===aeacca=mcmvaacacaac=aaa ma`="="`=`nn anaec=sa`======""accncea" Streets: (N-S) site access (E-W) prospect Major 'Street Direction.... EW Length of lime Analyzed... 66 (min) Analyst.. ............ mjd (late of Analysis.......... 3/3/97 �TT+� Other Information......... an, pnr 1997 short ( ,a/ B Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection v cuccaac__accaccc_caaaaaacceacaacacc_caacaacccaa=aa_aaaaca__cccccccaaccc ; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Sou thb uund L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T id �___- --------i---- --------i---- --------i---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ; 0 1 0 ; 1 1 0 1 0 1 ; 0 0 0 Step/Yield 1 N; N; ; Va l ulnas 1 779 12; 33 646 ; 27 21; PHF ; .95 .95; .95 .95 ; .95 .95; tirade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; MC's (2) SO/kV's CV's (%) PC E's ; ; 1 . 10 ; 1 . 10 1 . 10; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCS: Onsignalized Intersections kelease 2.1d page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: AT from Minor Street N6 36 Conflicting Flows: lvph) 626 potential Capacity: (pcph) 52B Movement Capacity: (pcph) 528 Prot:. ci Oueue-Free ------------------------------------------------------ State: 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major -----------=--------------- Street-------------WB EB Conflictin(t Fluws: (vph) ------------- 83B potential Capacity: (pcph) 687 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 667 Prob. of Queue -Free -------------------------------------------------------- State: 0.94 Step 4: LT from Minor- -------------------------------------------------------- Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1542 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 135 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 Capacity Adjustluant Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.94 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- 1pcph) 127 Adjustment Factors Intersection performance Summary Vehicl,t Critical Follow-up Avg. 95% rmr,euver Lap ttg) Time (tf) _ Flow Muve Snared Total Oueue Approach ------------------------------------------------------------------ ka l:e Cap Cap balay Length 1_05 Delay Lart Turn Major koad 5.00 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (ver,) (sec/veh) kight Turn Minor koad 5.50 2.60 -------- ------ ----- ------ ------- ------- ----- ----- Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.50 N6 L 31 12? 57.4 1.0 E Left Turn Minor koad 6.50 5.40 24.2 N6 R 24 526 7.1 0.0 B WB L 39 687 5.6 0.0 B 0.3 Intersection Delay = 0.9 sac/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.Id 'page 4 cc==aIIIIccoaaaaIIaavcac=caacaaaaccaa=aacaa==acIIaa=aaccIIvaasaIIc=ca==caaa== Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Well Nall Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Pn: (904) 392-0378 . II C 9= IIL a C a Straets: (N-S) 'site access (E-W) prospect M.Jor Street Direction.... EW length of Time Analyzed... 60 (win) Analyst ................... mjd bate of Analysis.......... 3/3/97 Omar Information ........ .am pm 1997 short 6 Iwo -way Stop -controlled InTersection ==caaaaaaaavaa.IIva==a== v.IIvaccaIIaacavaaaII... ..vva......IIIIIIcaca=aacaaac 1 Eastbound Westbound I Northbound I Suuthbound I L T R L T R I L T R I L T R I---- --------i---- --------i---- --------i ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 0 1< 0 11 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield ) NI NI Volumes ) 479 111 17 668 13 101 PHF 1 .95 .951 .95 .95 ; .95 .95: Grade 1 0 ; 0 0 ' MC's (Y) St,/RV's (Y)1 1 CV's (Y) 1 1 I PCE's i 11.10 11.10 1.101 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.1d Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 510 Potent-Ial Capacity: (pcph) 764 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 764 Prob. of Gueue-Free State: 0.96 --------------------------------------------- Stap 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcpli) Prob. of Queue -Free State: ------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street ------------------------------- Confllcting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: tpcph) Major LT. Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) ------------------------------- SE WS EE 5B 0.96 0.98 0.98 261 ------------------------ Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95.. Maneuver -------------------------------------------t----------------- 6ap ( 9) Time (tf) Flow Move Snared Total t Queue u c Approah Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay kight Turn Minor Road 5.56 Mc•vernent (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) laec/vth) lhr wgh Traffic Minor Road c.OU 2.60 .30 -------- W. L ------ 15 ------ ------ ------- 2U1 15.4 ------- ----- 0.1 C ------eh) Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 i NE k 12 764 4.8 6.0 A 13.0 WB L 20 973 3.8 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay a 0.3 sec/vet. APPENDIX C - "CM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 03-11-1996 II(:M: SIGNALIZED 111TERSECTION.5IIMMARY Version 2.4 03-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers aavaaaaaa=aaa======acc=c=a=cv==acc=c=ccac==xaccc==xxc==xccvacxaancccaq=,. In Transportation Center For Microcomputers Ir, Transportation Streets: (E-W) prospect (N-S) summit view c=_=aavaa=cvna=c===a==a===av==a===a=aaa===a== Analyst: Matt File Name: Straats: (E-W) prospect Analyst: Matt (11-5) summit view F Area Type: tier 3-I1-96 am pa, I I 8 llama: Coemnent. 19 B Iota lot.7 Ar ua 1 Y' r Commentpa: 1996 iota lot? aln 3-11-96 pin =�=c==c=cam=caac=c=ac=xcc===a=v===accccacacc Eastbound m xcc=caaa=mcxcaaaacxvaa=c ; Westbound } Northbound ; Soulhbound __==cxac=c=aaacxccva=ccaa=axc==a axc=axc=aaac=cccaaa=ccnnavxc j L T R: 1.. T R j L T R j L T R Eastbound : Wastbound : Northbound I Soulhbound ;---- --------:---- ---- ----j---- ---- ---_� _-- __-- __-_ I L T R : L T R : t. T R : L T R No. Lanes 11 I : 1 < I i 1 1 1__-_ ---- -_-- _-_----- _--_ _-_----- -__---_----- _--_ _ - Volumes Ito. Lanes I 1 1 I I < I I I PIIF or PK1510.95 0.95 ; 0.95 0.951 10.95 0.95 Volumes 1 105 415 1 555 100: : 50 125 Lane Width 112.0 1?.0 : 12.0 I 112.0 11.0 PIIF or PK1510.95 0.95 1 0.95 0.95: :0.95 0.95 Grade 1 0 : 0 : j 0 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 : 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 8 118avy Vehl 2 2 : 2 21 j 2 2 Grada 1 0 j 0 1 : 0 I Parking j(Y/N) N :(Y/N) N j 1(Y/N) N % Nuavy veh: 2 2 : 2 2: j 2 2 Bus Stops : O: 01 , Parking :(Y/N) N !(YIN) N : I(Y/N) N Con. Pads j 0: 0: 0: 0 trot Stops : 0' 0' n , 0 Pad Button ,(Y/N) N �(Y/N) N : 1(Y/11 N. C.,n. Putts I 01 0: 0: 0 Arr Type : 3 3 : 3 31 1 3) 3. f•ad button I(Y/N) N j(Y/N) N : I(YIN) N R10R Vols : OI 01 j 0 Ary Type, 1 3 3 1 3 3: 1 3 3 Lost Time 13.00 3.00 : 3.00 1 3.001 :3.00 3.00 kl0k Vols 1 01 01 : 0 Prop. Share: -1 -1: -1 -11 j -1 -1 Lust Time 1.3.00 3.00 : 3.00 3.08: 13.00 3.00 Prop. Prot.: -2i -21 j -2 Prop. Share] -1 -1: -1 -l: I I 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Prop. Prot.1 -21 -2: : -2 Signal Operations ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 a Signal Operations EB Left * INB Left Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 B Thru • I Thru EB Loft * INB Left Right I Right Thru * : Thru Pads Pads Right j R191nt WB Left ISB Left Fads : f•ads Thru * : Thru WO Left ISB Left * Right * l Right Thru * : Thru Pads : Peds kiuht * : kight * NB Right IEB Right Fads : I`eds SO Right jWB Right Nfl klght jE6 Right. Green 37.OP ]Green 13.OA 56 1(ight jK k-Ight Yellow/AR 5.0 :iellow/AR 5.0 6c.61i 37.OP IG;-aan 13.DA Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combination order: 111 85 1'al�ow/Af( 5.0 :fallow/Ak 5.0 I --------------------------`-------------------------------_------------ Cycle Length: 60 sacs Phase combination order: 111 a5 Intersection Performance Summary ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Group: AdJ Sat v/c 9/C Approach: Intersection Performance Summary Mvints Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS Lane romp: AdJ Set v/c O/C Approach: � ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----' --- ----- --- MvInts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ED L 151 233 0.555 0.650 7.6 B 5.4 , B ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- T 1211 1863 0.595 0.650 5.1 B EB L 135 208 0.821 0.650 ?7.0 0 8.5 B WS TR 1076 1656 0.617 0.650 5.4 B 5.4 0 T 12.li 1863 0.361 0.650 3.7 A SB L 442 1770 0.167 0.250 13.4 B 13.7 B Wft TR 1065 1639 0.647 0.650 5.8 B 5.8 B R 396 1503 0.280 0.250 13.9 B Sf. L 442 1716 0.110 0.250 13.2 B 13.9 6 Intersect ion Delay - 6.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS B' f( 396 1583 0.334 0.250 14.2 8 j Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.523 Intersection Delay = 7.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS B ' ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest Time/Cycle. L = 6.0 sac Critical v/C(x) = 0.686 -----=----------------------------------------------------------------- Canter For Microcomputers In Transportation IICS: 11ns19na'Iizud Interaection Releaua .1 Page 1 Y/'If/YY�I•;Yi-/iY;>4iiYfi;4ilfY;if-I ifi/ifff111f1;iiiiiiiii i't ii Yii I File flame ................ Sir eats: (N-S) frontage road (E-W) prospect Major Street Direction.... EW 1..,ngth of T1me Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... m.ld i Data of Analysis.......... 3/11/96 Other Information......... an. a 1996 lot8 lot? Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection _+a;cnaa=acaccc=c=acc=ac=ca=a=cc=c>sa=cca;==ca;c=occaa====aaaaaacacccac I Eastbound I Wastbound I Northb04nd I Southbound 1L T R: L T RI L T RI L T R I-----------1---- ---- ----1---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes I 0> Ic 01 0> 1< 0: 0> 1< 0: 0> 14 0 Stop/Yield I NI NI i volumes i 40 720 5: 5 535 15: 5 5 51 20 5 90 PIIF : .95 .95 .95: .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95 Grads 1 0 1 0 : 0 I 0 i MC's (X) 1 0 0 01 0 0 0: 0 0 0: 0 0 0 SU/kv's (1)1 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 0: 0 0 0 Cv's (X) 1 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 PCE's 1 1.1 1.1 1.11 1.1 1.1 1.11 1.1 1.1 1.11 1.1 1.1 1.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adjustment Factors vuhic 10 liuuauvar -------------- ----------- Lett Turn Major Road Rit.ht Turn Mfnor Road 11hrough Traffic Minor Road Loft Turn Minor Road Critical Follow-up Gap (lg) lime (lf) __--oG_________________�O___ 2. 5.50 2.60 6.06 3.30 6.50 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation TICS: Unsignalizad Intersection kalease 2.1 Page 2 ♦;4444f 44 YJ:;wfl./A 4a A.I:;;14;4;;:{;;;;;;i.1;i%/f,l ii;A;Y;;;%;Z;t;;;;;; WorkShaat for TWSC Intersection ------------- Step I: kT from Minor Streat -------------------------------------------------------- ND ------------ SB 'Confllcting Flows: (vph) 722 542 Potant'Ial Capacity: (pcph) 596 736 Mpvan.ar.t Capacity: (pcph) 596 736 rrob. of Quaua-free State: ------------------------------------------------------ 0.99 0.86 Step 2: LT from Major Street -`------------------------------------------------------ WB Ea Conflicting Flows: (vph) 725 550 PoLaritial Capacity: (pcph) 774 938 MovamNnl Capacity: (pcph) 774 936 Prop. of Queue -fray State: 0.99 0.95 Tit Saturation Flow ksta: (pcphpl) 1706 1700 kT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Quaua-frea State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.90 Step 3: Tit from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- flit SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1310 1312 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 222 224 Capacity Adjustn.ant Factor due to ImpodinU Movaments 0.69 0.89 Mo•.smeut. Capacity: (Pcph) 196 200 Prot,. of Quaua-fraa State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 0.97 Star 4: LT from Minor $treat ....-----------------------------------------------------.. NE SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1356 1315 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 173 183 Major LT, I4inor 114 Impedance Factor: 0.87 0.86 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.90 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor duc to I111p6dinU Movements 0.77 0.89 M,.vem,+wt Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 133 162 Intarsactior. Perforn.ance Sua.mary Flowkata MovaCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement. v(pcph) Cu.(pcp1.) Csh(pcpf.) Delay L'OS .. '.... .. '•. NB L 6 133 > .------• -- ------- ND T 6 198 > 211 > 18.7 .> C. NB k 6 596 > > > .. .. .. SB L 23 162 >> ISB T 6 200 426 12.3 > C 12.3 SB k 105 736 > > > EB L 46 938 4.0 A 0.2 Wit ,L 6 774 4.7 A 0.0 ' Intersection Dalav c 1.3 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Ceutar For MIcrocouiputars In Transportation TICS: Unsignaltzad Intersection keluase 2.1 _ pa ) IICS: llnsignalizud InterPave Release 2.1 Pae 2 ge♦) »i>)>)Ili»ii;>♦;#i1w);i#.{;;;>;;>4>i#i))il iii; FI I a Name ................ Streets: (N-S) frontage road (E-W) prospect MaJor Street Direction.... EW WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection of Time Analyzed... 00 (min) -------------------- ----------------------------------- Aii&ly ................... wjd Step 1: AT from Minor Street NU SB bate of ale of Analysis.......... it tlior Information 3/1 3/11Pat � 1990 lot8 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3OU 638 ........ m Nm l017 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 801 658 iwo-way Stop-cont•ollad intersection Movement Capacity: (pcph) Bel 656 =e====.:=-== ...... ===ee:e====e===ee=e= Prob. of i)u,.ue-eras State: 0.99 0.94 I Eastbound 1 WastbOund ; Northbound ; Southbound -------------------------------------------------------- I L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R I Step 2: LT from Major Street WB E8 I------ ----i ---- ---- ----i---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- ------------------------------------------------------- No. Lanes 1 0> 1< 01 0> 1< 01 0> l< 01 0> 1< 0 Conflictiu-Flows: (vph) 390 650 Slop/Yield i NI 111 I Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1117 840 Volumes 1 80 385 51 5 625 251 5 5 51 10 5 35 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1117 640 i'IIF 1,.95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .951 .95 .95 .95 Prob. of'Qucue-free State: 0.99 0.69 bradss ,'l 0 I1C'c (X) 0 0 1 0 ; 0 1 0 111'SaturatiOn Flow kata; (pcphpl) 1700 1700 i 01 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 I RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 SUAV's M 1 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. CV's it) 1 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 of (Iiraua-fr•ae State: 0.99 0.85 PCE's 1 1.1 1.1 1.11 1.1 1.1 1. 11 1.1 1.1 1.11 1.1 1.1 1.1 ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slap 3: TIi frow Minor Street 146 SB -------------------------------------------------------- C,.nflIcting Flows: (vph) 1122 1112 Potential Capacity: (Pcph) 281 285 _ Adjustment factorsCapacity Adjustment Factor Vehicle due to Impeding Movements U.64 0.84 Critical Follow-up M.>vement Capacity: (pcph) 237 240 Maueuvar _.._'-------------------------------------------------------------- Gap (lq) Time (if) Prob. of 6,,.ue-free State: 0.97 0.98 Left Turn Major Road 5.Ou 2.10 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NO SB kluht Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 -------------------------------------------------------- lhrough lraffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1130 1115 L.'tl Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 235 239 hla jrn- LT, Minor Tfl I orP'cdanCr Factor: 0.02 0.82 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.66 0.86 Capacity Adjustment Factor duo to Impeding Movements 0.81 0.86 M.Y&ment Capacity: (pcph) 190 205 _ --------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Flowkata MovSharadCap tat Movement -) C-(pcph) Csh ph) DelayLOS ------------- ------ NB L 6 190 > NB --- > ------ > i NEs T 6 237 > 263 > 13.6 > C ' 118 R 6 eel > > S8, L 12 SU T 6 56 R 41 EB L 92 WB L 6 205 > > > 240 > 405 > 10.4 > C 656 > > > Delay ByAP°'- 13.6 10.4 840 4.8 A 0.0 1117 3.2 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.9 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation IICS: llnsignalized Intarsaction Release 2.1 - Page 1 ♦11'♦YI♦!♦yAYK♦#f YiiYiYyK iYllKyiiiAlyliAit A1A Ri1#YiiliiYiYYli YiYi File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) sb ramps (£-W) prospect Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst....' ............... mjd Gate of Analysis.......... 3/11/96 Other Information......... a1s Ps. 199 Iola 1017 Two-way Stop-controllad Intersection L L G II L 3 LS66IICLLLLLIILCC CL LS I Eastbound ; Wes thound I Northbound I .Southbound I L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R '---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ----' ---- ----' No. lanes 1 0 1< OI 0> 1 a; G 0 0! 1 0 1 Zit op/Y told I N; IJI i volumas I 245 4851 25 415 i i 15 125 P)IF ; .95 .95; .95 .95 ; ; .95 .95 Grade' I 0 1 0 ; o I 0 MC's (1) I 0 0; 0 0 i I 0 0 SG/Rv's (1); 0 0; 0 0 ; ; 0 0 Cv's (1) I 0 o; 0 0 ; 0 0 PCE's I 1.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.1I 1.1 1.1 I 1.1 1.1 Adjustment Factors vehicle PL.neuver ------------------------------ (eft. Turn Major Road kit,ht Turn Minor lioad Through Traffic Minor Road Taft Turn Minor kodd 0 Critical Follow-up Gap (to Time (tf) ---------------------------- 5.00 2.10 5.50 2.60 6.00 3.30 6.50 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation 11CS: llnsignallzad Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 ♦1:lAKi.lYA#Y#AA.{YiiA K4#YI.lKlKYI iKiIA!%i#.YKKR;#l.i K#liYYYiKiYKY♦K3Y WorkShast for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- 6tap 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflioling Flows: (vph) 415 Potential Capacity: tpcph) 653 Movamant Capacity: (pcph) 653 Prob. of Quvua-free Ststa: ' -------------------------------------------------------- 0.83 Step 2: LT from Major $treat --------------------------'------------------------------ WB EB Couflicting Flows: (vph) 730 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 770 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 770 Prob. of Queue-frea State: 0.96 Ili Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 kJ :saturation Flow kate: (pcphpl) Major 1_7 Shared Lana Prob. of Quaua-fray State: 0.95 -------------------------------------------------------- $tep 4: LT from Minor Street NBSB --------------------------- -___--_---_- Conflicting Flows: (vph) ---_--_-_-- 928 f vLent ial Capacity: (Pcph) 307 Major LT, Mirwr T11 Impedance Factor: 0.95 Adjustad Impedance Factor: 0.95 • Capacity Adjustumnt. Factor duo to Impodintl Movements 0.95 ' H.,V6114ant Capacity: (pcph) ' ---------------------------------------------- _---__-291 Canter For Microcomputers In Transportation TICS: tlnsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 page 3 !{.{K#.if.li{f1YiKl.IY YKKiY1YRYAKIiYYYY:{:rYiYYYYYYIY#Y-YYKYY3YiYYYl AYY '. Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay liuvement v(PcPh) Cm(pcph) Csli(pcph) -------- ------ ------ ------ Dalby LOS BY APP $a L 18 291 13.2 C --------- SB k 145 853 5.1 g 6.0 WB L 29 770 4.9 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 1.0 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation IICS: Unsignalized Intersection keluasa 2.1 Pago 1 •4$444464664441-4144*4.4i14!#444.1#4444.6 I.4.1#*1.$**144i i4#ii4Y 4#1 A41 IF 110 Na111Q . ...... . .. ..... . Streets: (N-S) nb ramps (E-W) prospect M.1Jor Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Ui,le of Analysis,......... 3/IO u lllar Information......... am m 1996 lots lot? Iwo -way Stop -controlled Intersection ===a=cca=cciaa==cacac==c=aa===aaa=c=s=c=aXccic=ccanici..J:acacacaaacacaca Eastbound I Was tbound I Northbound I Soulhbound I L T RI L T Al • L T RI L T k i---- --------i ---- --------i ---- --------i ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes I 0> 1 01 0 1< 01 0> 0< 01 0 0 0 . Slop/Yield 1 N: NI I volumes 1 165 100 80 151 350 151 ,I PIIF 1 .95 .95 1 .95 .951 .95 .951 im add 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 I-IC't (2) i 0 0 1 0 01 0 01 SU/kV's (s)1 0 0 1 0 01 0 01 Cv's M 1 0 0 1 0 01 0 01 PCE's 1 1.1 1.1 i 1.1 1.11 1.1 1. 1i Adjustment: Factors vehicle Critical Follow-up Ilanauver Gap (tg) lima (tf) --------------- -------------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Fight Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.66 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.06 3.30 Left Turn Minor Iroad G.50 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation IICS: Unsignelized Intersection kelaase 2.1 - Page 2 4JIYAIA4A1{4Ai!#llJ4li4JlYi4#{4{4>:i JX4Yi{IJ44J'4liX4iiiiiii4Y!#Zi WorkSheat for IWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: R1 from Minor Street NB $B Conflicting Flows: (vph) 100 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1232 Movement Capacity: (pcptl) 1232 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- WO EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 95 Potantial Capacity: (pcph) 1545 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1545 Prob. of QueUa-frae State: 0.86 TN Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.87 -------------------------------------------------------- . Step 4: L1 from Minor Strdat tie. SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 352 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 662 Major LT, Minor III Ia,padu,l" factor: 0.87 Adjusted Impedar,ca factor: (1.87 Capacity Adjustmeril Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.67 M,,vemeut. Capacity: (pcph) --------------------------------------------------------- 574 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation IICS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Peg* 3 #A♦♦iYA.'.A4#X.I.I:X4#.i4A.4#4XXX44'44XiXX>4Zi{iXi#X.r X-.iiiiiiiiiiiiiXXYiii Intersection Performance Summary F1owitate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ------ ------ N6, L' 405 574 > ------------ > ------ > ------- 587 21.5 D 21.5 NB R 18 1232 > > EB L 191 1545 2.7 A 1.7 Intersection Delay 11.4 _ W(tit+1Yris49Asaf1lG1ilIe4nkips lOafYdn+maRkvisa JQIIRows Rea IUtisrK*Pao ait Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized fnterseetion Release 2.1 Page 1 .K•r•aK>.rKK•Kr Ksi•:.K1KKssi KisKii » >••>•f ••t>KK••Y4iKiiK•iKKixi♦ WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection File Name ................ ---------------- --------------------------------------- Step. 1: AT from Minor Street NO SB Streets: IN-S) nb ramps (E-W) prospect --------------------------------------------------- Major Street Diractlon.... E1J Conflicting Flows: (vph) 7 Langth of Time Analyzad... 60 (min) Potential Capacity: (pcph) 12766 Analyst ................... Date of Analysis.......... mjd 3/I1/96 Muvament Capacity: (pcph) 1276 uthar Information......... am pill 199E loth lot? Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.99 Two-way Stop-eontrollad Intersection I Step 2: LT from Major Straal Wit EB a cacao aa��c��___cc_cccva�c_a�ac____ aaavicevacaaa ac aacvaaaaacavvvcasaav __________________ ______________________________________ ( Eastbound } Westbound } Northbound I Southbound Conflicting Flows: (vph) 110 I L T RI L T RI L T kI L T R Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1519 }---- ---- ----1---- ---- ----}---- ---- ----1---- ---- ---- Movemant Capacity: (pcph) 1519 No. Lanes I O> 1 OI 0 1< 01 G> O< 01 0 0 0 Prob. of Queue -free State: I 0.92 Stop/Yield 1' N' N' , Saturation Flow hate: (pcphpl) 1700 Volumes } 100 70 I 100 10I 445 i3: RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) PNF I .95 .95 } .95 .951 .95 .95I ob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. urada 0 1 0 I 0 1 1 0 of Queue -fray State: KC's (X) } 0 0 } 0 OI 0 0} ---__-0_92 511/RV's (X) } 0 0 1 0 01 0 01 Ste 4: LT frao Minor Street I p NO C V's(X) 1 0 0 } 0 OI 0 OI ___---_--__ _-_-_-_-_--SB 1. 1, 1.1 1-1� Conflicting Flows: (vph) 275 --------------�--___-1_1 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 734 Major LT, Minor TN Impedance Factor: 0.92 Adjustment Factors Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.92 capacity Adjustment Factor Vahiclt Critical Follow-up due to Impeding Movements 0.92 Maneuver hap (tq) tg) Time (if) -------- Capacity: (pcph) -5 -- Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.56 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.60 3.30 Left Turn Minor koad 6.50 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation NCS: linsignalizad Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 >••••:>a>K444••••••KKKii•K•K•Y:FiiiKiK}KIiK•.1'I.K K:4KK Kl.KiKiiiiKKKiiK Intersection Performance Summary FlowRata MovaCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph), Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) -------- ------ ------ ------ Delay ------------ LOS-_ By App NO L 515 675 > ---� �------�- 686 22.8 D 22.8 NB R 18 1276 > > > . EB L 116 1519 2.6 A 1.5 • Intersection Delay 14.5 HCM: 516NAL17ED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 03-03-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation eczc=zaaaczzacccz=cazzczzzczzzzzzzczczzzc=_ccz_c=aacc___-_-_-=-ccz-v zzczz Streets: (E-Wi prospect (N-S) summit view Analyst: Matt File Name: - Area Type: Other ;;-3-97 am pm Comment: 1997 c zzzc_aazaa_=zaccc====z=aavccc=zc=c=zac=zz_cczaaccczzzzczcczzzz=c=vcc=z Eastbound Westbound ; Northbound SouIt) bound .; L T R ; L T k ; L T k ; L T _ k ---- ---- ----1---- ---- No. Lanes ; 1 1 1< ; 1 1 Vo Iumas ; 117 444 ; 674 15; ; 25 187 PFIF or PK15;0.95 0.95 ; 0.95 0.95; ;0.95 0.95 Lane W (ft);12.0 12.0 ; 12.0 �12.0 12.0 0 D o S. Heavy Veh; 2 2 ; - 2; 2 Paris in9 ;(YIN) N ;(YIN) N ; ;(YIN) N bus Stops ; 0; 0; 0 Con. Pads ; 0; 0; 01 0 Fed button 1(Y/N) N ;(YIN) U ;(YIN) N Arr Type ; 3 3 ; 3 ; s k TOk Vols ; 0; 01 0 Lost Time 13.00 3.00 ; 3.00 3.00; ;3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; ; Prop. Prot.; _______________________________________________________________________ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 4; 5 6 7 8 E6 Left • " ;NB Left Thru ' " ; Thru Right Right P e65 P• o: WE. Laft S.F.!Left Tnru • Thru Right Right Peels Ieoz ND Right !Eli Right SE, I: ight ;Wt. Hight Green 8.OA 35.OP ;Gr yen 18.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 5.6 ;fellow/Ak 5.0 Cycle Length: 75 sacs Phase combination ----------------------------------------------------------------------- order: N1 82 N5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c 1,/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Rut.io _____ ____ _______ Ratio Delay LOS belay LOS _____ ES L 312 1770 0.394 _____ _____ ___ 0.653 6.0 _____ 6 4.4 --- A 1 1217 1863 6.364 0.65J 4.0 4 WE. TR 824 1671 0.879 0.493 16.6 C 18.6 C SE• L 472 1770 0.055 0.267 13.2 B 15.2 C k 422 1563 0.467 0.267 15.5 C Intersection Delay = 12.7 sac/vah Intersection LOS - 6 Lost Time/Cycle, L a 9.0 sec Critical ----------------------------------------------------------------------- v/c(x) - 0.713 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 03-03-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) prospect (I1-5) surmeit view Analyst: Matt File Name: O Area Type: Other 3-3-97 am pm Comment: 1997 . zczc xczann=cmz==czz=ca=zccc=zccc=zc=z=zzz m czaacczzccczczaaz m aeczaac Eastbound i Westbound ; Nor ti, bound Soull,ouund L T R 1 L T R; L T k; L T k i---- --------!---- -----i--------!---- No. Lanes ; 1 1 ; 1 ; Volumes ; 166 699 ; 574 57; ; 14 _-_ - 1143 PliF or PK15;0.95 0.95 ; 0.95 0.95; ;0.95 0.95 Lane W (ft);12.0 12.0 ; 12.0 i ;12.0 12 ' Grady ; 0 ; 0 ' 0 I. Heavy Val.: 2 2 ; 2 2; 2 Parking ;(YIN) N ;(YIN) N ; ;(YIN) N bus Stops ; 0; 0; ; O Con. P6ds 0; 0: 0; 0 Ped Button ,(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ; ;(Y/N) N Arr Type 1 3 3' k70R Vols ; 0; 3 0; I s 03 Lost Time ;3.00 3.00 ; 3.00 3.001 13.00 3.00 Prop. Share; Prop. Prot.: 1 ; _______________________________________________________________________ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 24 5 6 7 6 EB Left. ;NB Left Thru ' • ; Tnru kight i Right P eds ; Peds WC Lmf t. ;SE. Left ihru ihru Right ' ; fright ' F•rds Pad_ NE'• f; iglrt ;Et. Right .`;E F:irl,t iWE, kitiht Green 3.OA 35.OP ;6r een 16.0A fellow/Ak 4.0 5.0 ;fellow/Aft 5.0 Cycle Length: 75 secs Phase combination order: 8l 42 85 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Intdrsection Performance Summary lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvurts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Oa f by LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB 1. 512 1770 0.561 0.653 7.7 E. 5.9 B T 1217 1863 6.605 0.653 5.4 6 WP. Tk 819 1661 0.785 0.493 13.7 B 13.7 6 5b L 472 1770 0.03( 0.267 15.1 b 14.5 6 R 422 1583 0.358 0.267 14.6 B Intersection Delay a 9.6 sec/vah Intersection LOS a 6 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.661 --------------------------------------- HCS_ Unsignal{zed Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transports Lion University of Florida 512 Well liall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 _ Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (V-S) sb ramps (E-W). prospect Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Ariblyst................... mjd Data of Analysis.......... 3/3/9 Other Information......... am pm 1997 short A e Two-way Stop -controlled Intersecttm, i Eastbound Westbound Nol'thbound Sc.uthbound-- i L T R ; L T R L T R ; L T R i---- --------i---- --------i---- --------i---- ---- ---- No. Lanes i 0 1 0; 0 > 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield i Ni N; 1 Volumes 242 4001 24 384 i 8 120 PHF ; .95 .95; .95 .95 ; ; .95 .95 Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 MC's I%) I i PCE'5 ; ;1.10 ; ;1.10 1.10 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factor_. Vehicle Maneuver ---------------------------- Left Turn Major Road fright Turn Minor Road Tnrpugh Traffic Minor Road Left lurn Minor Road Q-1 tical Follow-ur. odp (tg) Time (t:f1 ---------------------------------- 5 .OG 10 5.56 ?.60 6.00 0 6.50 .aD RCS: Unsignalized Intersection_ Release 2.1d Page 2 GGG=GCG===�GLGGGGG�=GG3G==Gi_G_=______ Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Stcep 1: RT from Minor Street NF. Se Cor,f Noting Flows: (,Ph) 404 Potent-lal Cbpacity: (pcph) 664 Ii;,Vemen( Capacity: (PCPI,) 864 Pr Ob• of Queue -Free data: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.84 Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- We Eb Conflicting Flows: (vpF,) 676 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 617 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 617 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 1H Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lana Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------'--'-----'- 0.96 Step 4: LT fron, Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- N8 Se Conflicting Flows: (vph) 894 Potential Capacity: (Pcph) 321 Major LT, Mina- TH Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Cbpacity Adjustment. Factor du, to impedin(, Movements 0.96 Mnveman t. La p.i.^1ty: (Pcph1 .._______________________________________________________ _07 Inter_eition F',rt'r,rrnance &bamtry Avg. 95% Flow Move Sharad Total Queue Approacl, kate Cap Cat. Delay Length. LOS be lb1, Movement (Pc'Ph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ ------ (sec/veh) SF. L 9 307 i?.1 ------ ----- 0.0 C ------_-- 56 k 135 E64 5.0 0.6 A 5.4 We L 26 817 4.6 0.0 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 0.7 sec/veh HC:S: Uns igna lied Intersections kelease Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ofover*-it) of Fl,r ids 512 Weil Hall 6ainesville. Ft. 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (W-sl sb ramps (E-W( prus.p a.t Major Street Direction.... EW LanOth of Time Analyzed... 6h Analyst... ............. mid Late of Analysis.......... 3/a/97 Other Information........ am pm 1997 sha•t A E.Two-way Stop -controlled Intersectior• .v=n_=ccca=ccc=e=ccc=o=c==sc=cc=c<=ecc=cocoa==cacc_o==co===cc=cca==ccze Eastbound We Lwound Nur tl,buund Suuthbound L T k ' L T k L T R L T k i____ ____ ____i____ ____ _-______ ____ ____i____ ____ ---- No. Lanes ; 0 1 0; 0 1 0; 0 0 0; 1 6 1 Stop/Yield I N; N; ; vc•lumes 106 2361 19 564 ; 4 1g9 PHF ; .95 .951 .95 .95 .55 tirade ; 0 ; 0 ; ; 0 PIC's (%) 1 SUAV's (%)1 1 I Cv's (%) 1 ; PCE's i 11. 10 i 11.10 _________________________________________________________________-_____ 1.10 Adjustment Factors vehicle Cr'It ic'al F311.iw-UP M +(tW rver' ______________________________________________..________________..-_ c•.il it.c '• Tlmc It.I Left Turn Major koad S.i1G .10 bight Turn Minor Load inrough Traf i1c Minor koad Lett Turn Minor koad G.SG 1.40 HCS: Unsignalize(I Intersections Release "l.ld Ea yv_1 Worksheet for iWSC Intersection --------------------------------------- _____________ leP I: kT from Plinio' J1.r eat Nt,SE, Conflicting Flows: (vph) 531 f(•ter,tial capacity: (Pcph) 745 P),-.vement Capacity: (PCPh) 745 Prob. r,•f Queue -Free Stale: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.76 Step 2: LT from Major Street ________________________________________________________ W6 E6 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 362 Potential capacity: (pcph) 1152 Movement Capacity: (pcpF,l 1152 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 Th saturation Flow kate: (pcphpl) 1700 kT Saturation Flow Fate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 Step 4: LT from Minor Street ------------------------------------------------------- lib 56 Conflicting Flows: tvph) 789 Fotential Capacity: (pcph) 370 11ajor.LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted impedance Factor: C.S7 Capacity Adjustment. Factor 6uc to Impodir,y MOVNucntz 6.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ S60 Intersection Parfcrmance ;summary Avp. 95% Flow Move E.hared Total Queue Approach kate Cap Cnp belay Length LOS belay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcPh)(ser./vah) (veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ (Sac/veh) 56 L 4 360 10.1 _____ 0.0 C _________ 6.3 SE k 161 745 6.2 0.9 E. WE. L 22 1152 1.2 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay - 0.9 sec/vah m HCS: Unsiqnalized Intersections Release 2.1d pa9e Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Ur,iversity-of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2063 F•11: (404) 392-0379 Streets: 0-51 nb ramp_ (E-W) Prospect Major Street Direction.... EW Length of lime Analyzed... 66 (min) Anolyst................... mjd Date of AnalyBis.......... 3/ /97 Other Information......... am Pm 1997 short A 6 Two-way Stop -controlled Inter sa_n on ' EastoourrC , We_ (bound Northbound ; outt�tcund L 1 F; ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R i____ ____ __-_---- ____ _--_____ ____ __ ---- No. Lanes ; 0 : 1 0 6 1 . 0 0 . 0 : 0 0 0 6 Stop/Yield ; N1 N; Volumes 1125 117 ; 103 3; 334 13 pI1F ; .95 .95 ; .95 .95; .95 .95; Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; MC's (X) 5U/kV's CV's (X) PCE's ;1.10 ; ;1.10 1.10; ---------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehic lc Grit ice'. Fol,I,.--uP N,.T.vuver _________________________________________________-________________ )JF. (tyl Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 .10 kiuht Turn Minor i;oad 5.50 ;.66 Through Traffic Minor koaci 6.00 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.56 3-qp HCS: Unsignalizetd Intersections kelease 2. 1d Faoc Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- btap 1: RT from Minor Street ' NE. S6 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 123 potential Copa<ity: (pcph) 1260 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1:00 Vr'ol-.. of Queue -Free State: ------------------------------------------------------ 6.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street _____________________________________--__ WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) _ ____________ Ill Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1518 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) 151E Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.90 TH Saturation Flow kaie: (pcphpl) 1700 kT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Pr-ob. of Queue -Free State:: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.90 Step 4: LT from Minor Street ------------------------------------------------------- N8 S8 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 364 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 652 Major LT, Minor TH lmpedance Factor: 0,90 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.90 r.ap4: it 1• AdjuLtmecnt FZ.z t", cue to Impeding 1•ioveman Cs 0.90 Movement I: n,.acity. (papa) __----------------------------------------------------- 565 Interi,ction Fr; (+r mbr,de Suf0ll,ar'y Avq. 95% Flow Move Shared Icta) Queue Approach Fate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec!veh) (veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ (sec/veh) Nb L 367 565 :• _______ _____ _________ 596 10.3 6.1 C 18.3 N6 R 15 1200 EB L 145 1F 18 2.6 0.3 A 1.4 .Intersection Orley a 9.6 sec/veh -ICS: Unsignalizeo Intersections kelease 2.1d Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Un'i vers it I, cf Flor 'i do - 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 2.261i-208 Ph: (904) 392-0376 S Lr cc Ls: IN-S.) n0 rbmps (E-W) prospect Mo_icr Street Direction.... EW Length of lime Analyzed... 60 (min) Ai16iy5t................... mid Date of Analysis......... 3/5/97 Other Information........ am pm 1997 short A 8 Two-way Stop -controlled In errection Eastbound Westbound Northoound 5outhbound L T k L T k L T R L I I---- ---- --- ---- ----' No. Lanes ; 0 > 1 0 ; 0 1 0 ; 0 > 0 < 0 ; 0 0 0 Stop/field ; N; Ili Volumes 81 43 121 1; 484 19; PHF .95 .95 ; .95 .95; .95 .95; Grade ; 0 0 0 MC's (X) SUAV's I%); ; CV's I%) PCE's ;1.10 ;1.10 1.10; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors vehicle i-ritl•:a) F.: l low -up IS: oreuver __________________________________________________________________ ueP (tq) lime ,tfj Left Turn Major Road ,.00 10 Fright Turr, Minor Road 5.50 '.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.06 .30 Left Turn Minor Road G.50 .40 HCS: Unsignalizad Intersections- Release 2,Id PS4e 2 Wori,sheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step I: PT from Minor Street NA _ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 45 F'-atentibl Capac"Ity: (pcph) 1314 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) 151 14 Frob. of Oueue-Flee i;tata: -------------------------------------------------------- G.96 Step 2: LT from Major Street --------------------------- WE. EL Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------------- 126 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1490 Monument Capacity: (pcph) 1490 prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.94 TH naturatior. Flow Rate: (pc Plipl) 1700 kT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcph/.I) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Uueua-Free State: ------------------------------------------------------- 0.94 5tep 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NEI 56 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 258 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 751 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 LaPb City A<iju>iment Factor nne tc imued(nq M:,vamintz 0.94 Movement LaPbC'ity: (p�0,) _______________.-__-_-_____-.-_-________--________________ 762 1 rIC EI'S er,t i01'i Periormancc :-uma.ary Avg . 9jm Flow Move `hared Iri t al Oueue ApprobCh ka to Cap Cap Delay Lena th LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ (sec/vr>h) NE, L 560 702 : _____ --------- 715 25.8 11.2 D 25.8 NE. R 22 1314 '. Eft L 94 1490 2.6 0.1 A 1.7 Intersection belay = 17.6 sec/veh MAN ! o Irk"OA n MATTHEW J. DELICH , P.E. i 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLEr COUNTS Observer Date ► 9 9 Day R [ir/ city I' o e 7 l OI L i k) S R = Right turn INTERSECTION OF -_ SU M DI r 7- V I t,-Ij AND I R O S PC c -r S = Straight L = Lett tum TIME BEGINS Sr,NN,r VrJ North South ' P2DSP�c-r r��o P�cT T� West TOTAL ALL from NORTH from SOUTH I from EAST from WEST R S I L I Total II R I S I L I Total I R I S I C I Total I R I S I L I Total i slo I $ I (o 4 ll I I 1 II & 4 11 Z 11 6-01 1 15211 11951431 48 II 300 II' 364 -7a -� Ilse I ,3 3 II I I II b3 1 3 1 19 ( 1194� II I (Z7 13 31 I60 II �s-�t II 4 1 7 �o0 1135 1 4 1 43 I 1 1 II 4-3113 1a21 1 1R5 II 1 �9 13Z 1 Iz( II 3oCo II 349 �15 1137I 15 1 42 II I I II 42 17 Its( 1 1 )s811 1t03Iz9I 32-11 290 II 33z I I I II I I II I I I I II I I I II II 732301118'71 17D- I21 ZII I I 1 II z(Z 1115I1o741 I 4g11 1444111 715 61111zc o111 4- 2 I I I I I I I II II I I I I I I II II II I I I II I I I II II I I I I I I I II II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I II II II I I II I I I II I I 1 717 1 1 li II I I I I I I I I II I I I I II I I I I II F 71 I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I II .130134 1 3 1 37 II I I 11 37 11 S 11331 1 14-1 1 1163135-1 1 �Og 3Z 9 11 445 14 k 1 1 3 1 4 1 1I I 11 44 111Z 11 331 147 1 1162 137 1 1g9 11 3 34- 11 3 7g h-au 1-331 1 3 1 3(a I I I 11 3& 11 9 114(,1 1 15-'s I 1197 1Qg IZ3S 11690 114-Z s r5 135-1 - 11 40 11 8 11(6Z1 1 /7D 1 I2-0714 G 1253 1142 311463 I 1 1 I I I I II I I 1 I 11 1 1 I 11 11 430-5'b 1114 3I 114- 115 711 1 I I 11)5 7 1 37 IS�4'I I& I III `l g 1W 'i & 61114 7 (o I1(o 3 5 . I MATfHEW J. DELICH , P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 I TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer J L n Date 1 9 Day L,)Eo-u&Sr AV City G 12 T LnnOLL /A.) R = Right turn S Q C A A4 P I' P S= Straight INTERSECTION OF AND L = Lett turn TIME BEGINS 513 AA MP TOTAL Soutn 'North PRO . Pr: c -r Pe � p � c � TOTAL 1 East w estotal TOTAL ALL tram NORTH from SOUTH I trnm EAST I tram WEST I S I L I Total II R I S I L I Total I R. I S I L I TII R S I L I Total �3 o 114-2 4 14(o I I I I II 4(0 1 1149 1 (I /55- -;-r) 3Z i I �?z II 2 37 11 283 245 IIZ9 1 10 29 II I I II 09 11 1 I,to 1 4 1 144 16-;'130 i 19$ II z42 II 271 'i�v0 11401 10 14-0 II 1 1 II 40 II 11z3115-1 Izll ►Iz21 1 11211 11 zsl �19 Ilz� l 10 I z� I I I II 2 II 192 1 4 I q 11571 z4-I I �5 1 II 1 7 II zoo II I I I II I II II I I I I I I I II II 3o111391 14 1 i 4 311 I I 11 1 4 3 11 I6-041 19 I S 2 31L3(o1)0 R1 134 411 6 71110 10. II I I I II I I I II I I I I II I I I I II II I I I II I I I II I I I I 11 I I I II II I I I I II I I I it II I I I I I I I II II II I I I I I I I II I I II I I II II I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I II I I II � I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I ( I I I II 430 I3Z1 I Z 1 3 4 1 I I II 34 11 I loo 1 2 1 104 II 91 45-1 1 144 I ZSZ 1 2 19(o 4 T IZ71 3 1 3o I I I II 30 102 1177 70 I 14 -7 1 249 11 Z 79 s06 IZ5 I I 1 2!o I I II Z(' I 193 I 1 99 1►0ZI (�31 11(05 1 ;?&411 290 s1S 13c, Z 13% I I I 38 I 1 95-1 4-1 q9 IIZZI 64-1 1 1 t( 11 Z S6-1 3Z3 I I I I I I I II i I I I I I 430-53 IZo B 11z I I I128 3�4�z4 40Ss�ooI24Zl Ilo4Z Iv5oI117Q MATTHEW J. DELICH , P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer oC Dace 1 7 9 % Day ,,1 1: 51,E Y city F 6 f ' Zed L. C. //J R = Right turn INTERSEc-nON OF /�% g AMP AND PRO (- PG C T S = Straight L = Lett turn EISINS TIME /UR aMP trom SOUTH TOTAL North South ' F��y�PG-C r- I tram EAST PPnS Pic -a- TOT West TOTAL ALL from NORTH from WEST R S I L Total R S I L I Total I R I S I L I Total I R I S I L I Total �3o I II q I 113k 14-(p II 14Co II o 1 3o I 13o 11 1 1, 1IS 2 9 11 s9 II'Zos IIGj 114 ¢ 1 15-0 11 / 66 110 131 1 1 3 ► 11 1 IS, IZ 714- 5 II --7 6 11 2 Z C, c000 II I I I 1 4-1 1IlZl 116 11 IICo 11 1 IZs1 I Z(. II 1 R II'I1 2 11 s I 1116o-7 IS II I 1 1 II I 1 1901 91 11 41 11o12,s1 Ism II 1 /a 11 1zt�r 11 &o I1i51 II I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I II 7 3o- u ll I I I II 1 14?' 16 o - II 5-03 11 1 112 11 112 Z 11 14 31 � 1112 4-117- 4 (p11-7 4- 9 I I I I II I I I II I I I I I I I I I II II I I I II I I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I II I I I I I I II II II I I I I I I II I I I I I I II II I I II I I I II I I I I I I II II I I I II I I II I I I I I I II I I I I II I I I II II I I I I I I II I(0 191 1 q-7 11 0 1241 1 zd 1 I25 1a71 s-7 771 11 17 �r 45 I I 14 11001 ID411 104 1 1 1Z!�1 I Z- I 131 121.51 && 1 95 III q9 svG I 1 0 1641 II 6W 116 1 20 1 1 30 1 IZG I 15145' 11 75 111 39 17 I QZ I d2 I Z IZI I I Z3 135 lf1 -7 4 11 7 1117 7 i I I I I I II I I I I I I I II 4.3o-530 113 133¢1347U34? 3 11031 116 Z4 Z l34'8 II6 9 APPENDIX A m 4 A tiJ , , 1 N z0 20' 180' ` I i —__I L __—I_�-0OSPECT ROAD 320' ACCESS OPTION A GEOMETRY I 1 ----------------- ACCESS OPTION B GEOMETRY ----------�_- -- -- - -\L - II A& N =200' Figure 6 Wcm / Lo I--r---- I ; l II N I — O ( ( / 1 " - 200' ! IiLL—i�-'ROSPECT ROAD H _ 520' I r 180' 270' Figure 7 n Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM ACCESS OPTION A Prospect/Site Access (stop sign) NB LT C E NB RT A B WB LT A B Prospect/Frontage Road (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT C D SB LT/T D F SB RT B B EB LT B A WB LT A B ACCESS OPTION B Prospect/Frontage Road (stop sign) NB LT/T D F NB RT A B SB LT/T D F SB RT B B EB LT B A WB LT A B LGT 1 1 1 I 1 668/646 /--17/33 479m9 N N ho LGT 1 1 I I I 1 490/791— PROSPECT SITE I I i (W9 �o O¢ m LL s a, �' c �-- 46/37 "' 641/567 1/- 5/5 90 55 394 40 5/5 N h N AM/PM N ACCESS OPTION A W N 681/673 PROSPECT I SITE I I I �o �Q O¢ U- co co \a 46/37 nI 625/535 ! ; /-21/37 89/54 385 20 -� 16/17-, ACCESS OPTION 8 AM/PM n SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5 50� —55% Site TRIP DISTRIBUTION PROSPECT w N 1 W H Lo N O N N Figure 4 Table 1 Current Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Prospect/NB Ramps (stop sign) NB LT/RT D C EB LT A A Prospect/SB Ramps (stop sign) SB LT C C SB RT B A WB LT A A Prospect/Frontage Road (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT C C SB LT/T/RT C C EB LT A A WB LT A A Prospect/Summit View (signal) B B Land Use Learning Center & Office Uses Visitor Center State Parks TOTAL Table 2 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out 190 14 9 10 14 490 10 10 25 214 195 4 4 10 10 875 28 23 45 48 PROSPECT AM / PM m 1997 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 Ww > a°Q N ~ zo om Ir m. a a �� 7tj 00 0 105 80 �" 415 685 — CD 4z ' \— 25/15 in — 625/535 /-- 5/5 80/40-I 1 } r 385/720 5/5 PROSPECT ^CY f 490/415 J-10/25 ?45 ,� ,ao/ � 7a/t( pN N FUj a AM / PM Rounded to the Nearest q: 5 Vehicles. F z 1996 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 10/15 --100i Figure 3 c' 1 AJ- +L J "Mim a. RA ROAD r - 1 IN r T 1 1 c 1 0: DRAKE ROAD T t" = 3000, 1 L- - - - -- SITE LOCATION Figure t Figure 7 shows the geometry in the area along Prospect Road under Access Option B. Under this option, the Environmental Learning/Visitors Center would utilize the south leg of the Frontage Road. Geometry related to access to the LGT street is not shown in Figure 7, since this would not be related to the Environmental Learning/Visitors Center. With this access option, a westbound left -turn lane would be required on Prospect Road approaching the Frontage Road. In addition to this improvement,, the south leg of ,the Frontage Road would need to be paved to a suitable width, probably a. minimum of 36 feet. In order to access the site from the Frontage Road, an access road would be built to the site. This would require a crossing of Boxelder Creek. Under each of these access options, you indicated a desire to have direct right-in/right-out access to Prospect Road. This access would probably be near the west property line of the site. In my judgment, the biggest advantage to this limited turn access would be for exiting vehicles returning to I-25. This is especially true for RV's and buses. As you know, the City is reluctant to allow limited turn intersections without median treatments. Since medians can be expensive and will add to the overall width of Prospect Road, it may be appropriate to request a right -out only access at this location with a design that will. not require a median in Prospect Road. If this interests you, we can explore it further. It is concluded that acceptable operation can be achieved under either access option. While I do not have details regarding costs, it appears that Access Option A may carry with it a lower cost to this site. This judgment is made in consideration of a shared improvement program for Prospect Road, and the elimination of the .need for the westbound left -turn lane on Prospect and the improvements to the south leg of the Frontage Road and Boxelder Creek crossing. It assumes that an access easement can be negotiated with the Moore Family and the access road under Option A can be built for a reasonable cost. Visitors Bureau, and Colorado State Parks, with Anderson Mason Dale; August 1996. Table 2 shows the forecasted trip generation for this site. These forecasts were developed from the cited document, conversations with staff of the various participants, and Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE. Distribution of the generated trips will vary depending upon the specific uses on site. It is expected that the Environmental Learning Center and office uses on this site will attract trips related to population centers in the area. Figure 4 shows this trip distribution. The Visitors Center and Colorado State Parks facility are expected to primarily attract vehicles from I-25. This was estimated to be 80 percent of the entering vehicles for these uses. It was estimated that 60 percent of the exiting vehicles from the Fort Collins Convention/Visitors Center would visit an attraction in Fort Collins and would, therefore, go west. The remainder would return to I-25. It was estimated that 50 percent of the exiting vehicles from the Colorado State Parks facility would go west (toward Fort Collins) and the remainder would return to I-25. Based upon the above trip distribution assumptions, the generated trips were assigned to the accesses under the two access options. Figure 5 shows the short range peak hour traffic under each access option. The background traffic shown in Figure 5 includes development.of Lots 7 and 8 in the Interstate Land PUD. Since no specific use is proposed on the LGT property to the north, this access is only shown as a future street/driveway. Table 3 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections under the two access options. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate acceptably. Delays to minor street left turns at stop sign controlled intersections along arterial streets during peak hours are normal and are generally accepted by the motoring public. There will be very little delay during 22-23 hours each day. Each of the access options have geometric requirements related to them. It is my understanding that LGT intends to make improvements along Prospect Road, west of the Frontage Road. Access Option A takes advantage of these improvements by sharing in the widening and geometric improvements west of the Frontage Road. Figure 6 shows the geometry in this area of Prospect Road. Geometry related to the LGT access is a function of proposed land uses. Final design should occur later in the decision making process. This geometry provides adequate left -turn deceleration and storage on Prospect Road at the Frontage Road intersection (eastbound) and at the LGT/Site Access intersection (eastbound and westbound). As discussed with representatives of LGT, both CSU and LGT could share in the improvements to Prospect Road, west of the Frontage Road. I believe Sear -Brown Engineers are developing cost estimates for the necessary improvements. Note that no westbound left -turn lane is required on Prospect Road, approaching the Frontage Road. 00 MEMORANDUM co LO o � CO c) 0 TO: Tom Kehler, Facilities Management, CSU LO a to FROM: Matt Delich 0 d ° U rn DATE: March 5, 1997 • O X LL SUBJECT: Environmental Learnina Center at Prospect/I-25 J Interchange traffic study (File:970911EM1) w O J This memorandum was prepared to evaluate the access > o options related to the creation of the Environmental Learning d) and Visitors Center, proposed to be located on the south side cCOo of Prospect Road near the I-25 Interchange in Fart Collins. > o The site location is shown in Figure 1. The site is located = rn west of Boxelder Creek. The access options for this site are w w A) a full movement intersection approximately 840 feet (on o centers) west of the Frontage Road, and B) the Frontage Road N a intersection itself. Option A is proposed to line up with a N proposed access to the property on the north side of Prospect N Road, owned by LGT Real Estate. This option would require an access easement through the property to the west of the site, owned by the Moore Family. Option B would utilize the existing Prospect/Frontage Road intersection, but world require a crossing of Boxelder Creek. The scope of this traffic study was discussed with CSU staff and City of Fort Collins staff. It was decided that a short range analysis would be conducted at this time. Peak hour traffic counts were obtained at the I-25 Ramp/ Prospect intersections and the Prospect/Summit View W intersection in January 1997. These counts are shown in 0. Figure 2. Raw data is provided in Appendix A. Figure 3 shows the 1996 peak hour traffic, as forecasted from counts performed " = W in 1995 and provided in the "Interstate Land PUD Site Access z Study," November 1995. Comparison of Figures 2 and 3 V indicates that traffic in this area is relatively stable. _J l Chanae in traffic in this area would be caused by land W z o development or eternal factors that direct traffic to the Q a Prospect/I-25 Interchange. Table 1 shows the operation at the okey intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably. z The site (approximately 5 acres) is intended to be used W as the Environmental Learning and Visitors Center. Three _ users will have facilities on this site. They are CSU, the Fort Collins Convention & Visitors Bureau, and Colorado State U. Parks. A detailed description of the uses at this facility are described in "Colorado State University Environmental Learning/Visitors Center," prepared by Colorado State University, City of Fort Collins, Fort Collins Convention &