The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCSURF RESEARCH CAMPUS APRIL 2008 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2011-10-046a REVISION City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Forl Collins, CO 8052?_0580 Fax: 970-416-2020 DATE: November 21, 2007 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #24-04B CSURF Research Campus ODP — Type II SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW PLEASE NOTE: Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: December 5, 2007 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) eG L, Name (please prini) ' CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ( m��W�ft)m _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other City of Fort Collins _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape 6a REVISION Cityof FortCollins Planning and Zoning 1'O Box 580 COMMENT SHEET FOH Collins, Co 80522-0580 ha: 970-41 f -2020 DATE: November 21, 2007 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #24-04B CSURF Research Campus ODP — Type II SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW PLEASE NOTE: Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: December 5, 2007 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference Er-N--o Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) / JP /2/0y/a7- Name (please CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape 6a City of Fort Collins _ .. 4 , " �' P � r.F PROJECT Cityof fort Collins IAlit;iit�fiflg COMMENT SHEET ilfatil Zoning N ) f3i x 580 FolI G111in', CU'if ?>'"-0)y ,'t) DATE: October 22, 2007 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard # 4-04B CSURF Research Campus ODP Type II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: NOVEMBER 7, 2007 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems [2 Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) 'Sc C 12C= 0 C I r'3 e-s --- CG ca 2 S 131u_/ (�. C A Name (please pr 'nt) /VU i 7-12 A pus G r4 ra' ! V 416 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: October 31, 2007 Project: CSURF RESEARCH CAMPUS ODP-TYPE II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 07, 2007 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Langenberger Topic: General Number: 3 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] The following comments are from Denise Weston of Transportation Planning I recommend that the southern pedestrian crossing be moved further south, beyond the most southern driveway to avoid pedestrian/vehicular conflict. Also, this crossing needs to be created at a 90 degree angle across the roadway, minimizing the distance that the pedestrian is in the roadway. The northern end of the pedestrian trail, as shown on the plans, does not indicate if there is a roadway crossing at that location. It is not an advisable roadway crossing location. A preferred location would be just south of the Rest Area exit/frontage road intersection. There is a bridge over Box Elder Creek in that location and the pedestrian access could continue west along the southside of the bridge to the Rest Area location, allowing a pathway to the picnic tables, etc. behind the Rest Area. Currently, there isn't any ped access up to the Rest Area from the roadway or from the bridge crossing but at least a connection in that location would get them across the frontage road with limited vehicular conflict. In addition, the northern pedestrian access path should be continued all of the way north to Prospect Road, even if it just continues parallel to the frontage road on the east side. Currently, there isn't any pedestrian access on Prospect Road in that location but a connection would be established for the future. Confirm that the south/western edge of the pedestrian trail is designed to have some access or connectivity to the proposed City trail in that area. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report �_ OthernD Utility Redline Utility Landscape X —r1 S Page 1 AW The frontage road modification is acceptable, but confirm that coordination with CDOT has occurred or is ongoing on this alignment. If coordination has not begun, transportation planning would be happy to assist in initiating something. Number: 4 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] 1 know that the pedestrian alignment is somewhat conceptual — you even have a note to that effect, but we still need to make sure that it gets closer to what we want and can accept. At the south end the pedestrian crossing will need to be done at a 90 degree angle to the street and will need to be beyond the last access point shown. Most likely will be at the south side of that access driveway. At the north end of the site — if a mid block crossing is to occur (which generally makes sense to provide a connection to the rest area and the picnic tables and grounds there) the crossing will need to be on the south side of that driveway — which will also be the south side of your proposed access point. The sidewalk will also need to connect out to prospect, but this maybe able to be done with just the street sidewalk rather than a trail. Depends on if you see a trail connection out that way as well. Number: 5 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] Need to show where the driveway to the north into the rest area is located. We will want the proposed driveway to the east to either align or have adequate separation — especially since there are a high number of trucks that use the access to the rest area. Number: 6 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] The access point shown on the inside curve into parcel II maybe very problematic. The inside of a curve (especially this tight of one) is tough to do. The amount of sight distance easements and restrictive landscaping that would be needed to achieve a safe access point will a lot. It would be best to delete this access point or move it over to a straighter part of the roadway. Number: 7 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] Is one access point into parcel I going to be adequate? Number: 8 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] Need to better clarify the number of employees anticipated to be employed in the first phase of development and how that actually splits out between shifts and work. This will help greatly with considering the traffic impacts. Number: 9 Created: 10/31 /2007 [10/31/07] The TIS needs to identify the amount of traffic anticipated on the frontage road (in its new alignment) so a street classification for this roadway can be determined at the time of the first PDP submittal. That way we will know what the road section needs to be and how much row will need to be dedicated. With the PDP — will need to evaluate the pedestrian level of service and if a connection to the rest area any other destination maybe needed. The rest area would be a good lunch destination (with the picnic tables and such that they have). The conceptual land use plan that is in the TIS does not match the ODP that was submitted. Page 2