HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOOTHILLS FASHION MALL EXPANSION - Filed MA-MINOR AMENDMENT - 2003-01-15Page is too large to OCR.
Page is too large to OCR.
Current Planning Department
1 roni.�) )llcatlon l� orm
l 1
cane.n 1:,. nbr-Inli lL-7ii-5 li. �f F {,�,Ns ,font-'Ial1 F.�cFx^,%iick
=-- -
Prniad N:m 1L II 7— I L II G
Laud Use llrmrruoamr. '
Lrr �rII
rrnfe<n.ac:rr on(S1rcc,Add....): '.i91^. re=:r 11RI�-I*�Ll<'YY
Go.,,ACreugf)syaareronWge:
1'rajeri 1) csarlp lion:--rllr_ `(II'll ('in flC(i✓'t _�CDIr�lS
rxisGng7oiog: Yroposcrl Use:
addles(_ url n, rLl`a n r'n(4S
TolalNumbcrofDwdliugUnits:
J -T,t��
Total Cunnnv,rW Pluor A.:
)O�1S-O✓A
Guvral ll.fnnuulinu: Inr nllpugnn;raua.... hnringnlr,(vrUer...... lc inlc.af
Appliranl'slfausuiWntS Nam,: �.�yt,r�f
hdu prl p( II isq 1 / r. Jn ).
Nv eafrrrr. VF$ ku iL5 DUaI{S
o,.:,r r•, N ('):.1 '..
)v.rtI [':'�
f•,rrlarcT� Bob vim' criil'
sfrrel,lrnrevs Flo( W. MOrar��
strerlA II rJ- - �,j,. _
city/so-: u I Cr l qri (- ?052-�---
rtrlst:drarar: orb fl_nS_Co SO521
_A 2
Type of Request
Phr 'nrliunr If..npn aJ npplirmion yr I ....... J1"1,,'Aingfhe Loa przcediugllmn""n,rinler..aesf(s). Addilimral Inindoals are available orobiatng
sab rilbl regw eaner a for cnrh u/Jm fall::. in, rari.. pmaems.
❑ Ann —pion Pcfnlnn will: Iniuul%nuhgl REQUESff.D ZONE:
f cc SJ.1S8.IN) a $So (Y) zign p. ir.,: r¢
❑ Ilcu.ul jig l'ml(mn 0.1_f)UL'S'IISIJ LANE:
PaS'll].W r55000 lien you ing fcc
❑ Ocuall Dcvdopmo.l l`I:w (ODI') '
fee: .T L599.0U. 850,00.dgn poalug 6u . 5.50 for en::L APO label
O ru.jcr', Dcvdnrmcnl Pl:w 11'DI') w If .1 .Subdivisioo PbJ
Pre, S U87 00 r.$5O 00 sign yorfni8 feu r $.50 for cacti APO label
c) Pm)c<r Devdnp.n�m Plan O'1;Iq mill. Snbdivi,alo.. Pk,
Pc::5i;4 ]9.VU r $51AUU sil;n posriug Ire a SSU for cad. APO label
❑ 1 final Ilan mld.ual sabd.... ion l'IM
Pcm$Ivo
O I'iva I'lati.. wintl, Subdivision Plar
fcc:.$1 000.00
O AtoJlrcuinnoLS,an Lndsn ,I.,lW \tap Arendmcnt
Fmd2g1.W r S5U W sigu pnsdng ftt
Minor Amoalmun
Pre:arozlw r-q C ERTIPICATIOATON.
A'LINOI( AN1rNDAIGN'T
Description of the change and reasons(s) for the
Current Planning
Comments/Conditions:
❑ Mote Dcvclopmont Itcvicw
Ike: Varies: Cbak with [lie Current Planning Depzdmeat
❑ Major Anwnrl:nen,
Pcc: 13,206100. $50.00 sign posting fee
❑ Non-Cunfonniny Use Review
Pew S1,389.00
O Vacvlian er ROW or Easement
pee: $5. W per shm, of filing document
O Snrall Projcd Pees
Pcc: VaricsCLeck with the Current rlvnring Deparnnera
❑ .Seca N:m.e Change
For.S5.00
❑ I seem, dllnol Approval
Pcc $566.00
❑ Site flan Advisory Review
NO PEG
1rVr]?Sls AI UST Ur SIGA'L'D _a
CdIAPPROVED ❑ Arrr'ROVED WCONDMOns
Date: 'fC. ram/ a4dJ By.
Zoning 0APrizo vGD
Comments/Conditions: PtTl� -`5-
PLArrliuvr;D ly/C
Date:_ -3 By:
Engineering
Comm en is/Conditions:
Date:
Other (if
ArrlfOv/;D .. -a
❑ DENIED
❑ Ur:;vutu
w DF_�reD SEE "<Ar rn.Z rar aI'!1-i✓.III
,naJ bl lal 1 l u1 a fyk ,wWgeand dial filing I Illcl fine A ledge,
ux arJwal I,fl If like MIYI Ino,A I'-g 161 il 1"LI11:11il.I 'll I Y II �f L
n4 :ud iJ g LI; IIY' J d nnk 1111ty 1a re slltr-i,ll :III'-:- I
raluoLLA'rt slwr IJ wr ImfullY l:e acer I lnl I f �rsua:4 to m J uJwr Y. I lurtAy yer (r Cry n[fc I r u r oln he l npe:rY ; iJ rVi ✓cT(�=
a.ul if nmcssvy, rur Iws.iny a pnLlic ..ulicc an We Prupcny. Y
I
Nvnm 1phas l•IUM1: J C 061 SDI
Addres��. _ �ld�]-t✓e.._ l�'f. ZOI ;`O,t L.✓h i✓Y
Tvlgd.a �1-�._J_Q•�:__ �
i
z
Friday, May 14, 2004 12.17 PM Lagunitas (970) 226-5125
p.01
FAX
To: Dave Stringer
From: Jon Prouty
Date: May 14, 2004
Re: Bank of Colorado Development Agreement —telephone call follow-up
Dave, following up my telephone call
I think it would be a good idea for Engineering to require, if not done now, then at a later
date, that when the Webster property to the north of their bank site is developed, they
participate in expanding their access drive in conjunction with property we put in for a
public right-of-way.
Although there are other alternatives, given the curvature of the proposed realigned
Lemay and other existing conditions and roadways planned, this would appear to be an
important piece of planning to lock in.
It may be that we proceed successfully with Bank of Colorado accomplishing this, but if
not, I would request that the City in the best interests of safe streets, connectivity, good
engineering, reality, etc., proceed as described above.
FYI, I spent a full day with the Websters up in Wyoming. They have a spectacular little
ranch — and have executed copies of an Agreement and all easements required for the
Bank to proceed with its proposed development. However, the Bank has yet to come to
an agreement with us about them.
Call me if you wish at 377-1133.
Best regards.
Jon
J P/ksr
Page is too large to OCR.