The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNEW HAMPSHIRE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-06-09IN Selected Issues Report Citvof Fort Collins 4/10/2008 Date: SEVEN GENERATIONS OFFICE PARK PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLANS (FORMERLY EASTBROOK OFFICE PARK) SELECTION CRITERIA: Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Detail Sheet Number:57 Created:4/18/2006 Resolved [4/18/06] Final Compliance - Please add details 701, 1602, 2501, and the new ramp detail (I can send that to you email if you don't have it because I don't think its online yet). Topic: General Number:28 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] The existing attached 4' sidewalk along Eastbrook does not meet current standards and this development is responsible for upgrading their frontage to either an 8' attached walk OR a 4.5' detached walk. As discussed, Lance Newlin with Inspection went out to take a look at the sidewalk and reported back that the existing sidewalk is in very good shape and that no removals will be required (there is some broken curb that will need to be replaced but that's it). Engineering then discussed this with Transportation Planning and agreed that in this particular instance, we will only ask that you widen out the sidewalk to an 8' attached walk from the north drive entrance to the bike trail where the need is the greatest. We will not require the rest of the sidewalk to the southern property line to be widened out at this time. Please install a ramp in accordance with detail 1602 (T- Intersection Ramp requirement). Number:29 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Parking setbacks from Eastbrook are 50'. The current layout does not meet minimum requirements. (note: should be 40' setback and they are meeting requirements) Number:30 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Driveways must be perpendicular (plus or minus 10 degrees) for a minimum of 25'. Number:32 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] Minimum inside turning radii for Emergency Access Easements is 25' and minimum outside turning radii is 50'. 1 will need an exhibit showing that PFA's requirements are being met - an 8.5x11 is fine. Number:33 Created:3/7/2006 Pending [9/26/06] Please submit the legals & exhibits for each of the easement dedications along with the completed TDRF application. [4/18/06] Final Compliance comment -just carrying this through until then. [3/7/06] Please provide legals and exhibits for all easements being dedicated by separate document for our review. Page 1 Number:34 Created:3/7/2006 Pending [9/26/061 [4/18/061 Final Compliance comment -just carrying this through until then. [3/7/06] All easements to dedicated by separate document have a $250 processing fee each plus the appropriate Larimer County filing fee. Number:35 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [4/18/06] I'm checking with Stormwater to see if we can get by with just a letter of permission from Lot 4 versus an actual easement since Lot 4 is owned by this development as well. [3/7/06] Please show, label and dimension all easements on all plan sets. All plan sets need to match. The landscape plans are showing offsite grading along the north side of the property line that the utility plans do not. Number:53 Created:4/18/2006 Resolved [4/18/06] The utility easement vacation request was routed and approved provided that this project does not require any portion of the easement to remain. It appears from the plans that this is not going to be a problem. In addition, a $400 fee for vacating the easement is required. Please forward a check made out to "City of Fort Collins" prior to going to hearing if possible or we can put the payment off until Final Compliance if you need to. The legals and exhibit as well as the actual vacation can take place during Final Compliance. Number:59 Created:4/18/2006 Resolved (4/18/061 Engineering is ready for this project to go to Hearing. Number:67 Created:9126/2006 Pending [9/26/06] 1 can email you the Development Agreement (DA) Information sheet if you email me at sjoy@fcgov.com. Please fill it out and fax or email it back to me when convenient and we can start on the DA. Number:68 Created:9/26/2006 Pending [9/26/061 Will you be starting construction soon? If so, we can start on the Development Construction Permit. I can email all of that information as well. If the project is going to wait awhile, then call us when you're ready and we'll fill everything out then. Number:69 Created:9/27/2006 Pending [9/27/061 Change the name on all plan sets to match the new title. Topic: Grading Sheet Number:56 Created: 4/1812006 Resolved [4/18/06) Final Compliance - Label all slope ratios. Number:58 Created:4/18/2006 Resolved [4/18/06] Final Compliance - Please provide spot elevations for the lot comers. Topic: Site Plan Number:55 Created:4/18/2006 Resolved [4/18/06] Final Compliance - Please dimension and label all easements to match the utility plans. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 31 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved Page 2 [3/71061 Grading Sheet - Drainage at the driveways must have the HP at the row line. That way drainage goes back into the site from the row back and into the street from the row forward. (Final Compliance) Number:36 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [317/06] Grading Plan - please refer to detail D10/Sheet 8 for the sidewalk chases (Final Compliance). Number:37 Created:3/7/2006 Resolved [3/7/06] More detailed comments to follow with Final Compliance submittal. Number:54 Created:4/18/2006 Resolved [4/18/061 Final Compliance - Station the driveway curb cuts. Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Eric Bracke Topic: Traffic Number:I Created:2/16/2006 Unresolved [2/16/061 On page 4 of the TIS, it incorrectly states that the area is a mixed use district and the level of service standards are E for overall operation and F for approach leg. The structure plan defines this area as an industrial district, where the LOS standards are D and E, respectively. The intersection of Timberline/Danfield currently has the WB approach leg failing the standard. However, since the project does not add trips to this leg, they should not be held accountable for the deficiencies. A direct pedestrian connection from the parking area to the Vermont Trail/underpass may be appropriate. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: General Number:49 Created:3/10/2006 Resolved [3/10/06] 1 concur with comment # 4 above. More bicycle parking should be provided and should be located nearer to building entrances. Pleae coordinate all bicycle rack locations on utility/landscape/site sheets. Thanks. Number:50 Created:3/10/2006 Resolved [3/10/06] This project will be able to better address some Ped LOS deficiency's if you can figure out a way to connect directly to the multi -use path that lies on the parcel to the north. A connection could cross that northern drive -aisle and tie directly into the ped circualtion system that you have proposed on site. This would more adequately address the Failing "Directness" measure for the neighborhood to the west of this site. Number:51 Created:3/10/2006 Resolved [3/10/06] Need to provide a ramp near the handicap parking located off of the northern drive aisle. Number:52 Created:3/10/2006 Resolved 13/10/06] Need to intall a crosswalk ramp south of the northern drive aisle entrance that aligns with the existing ramp on the SE corner of Vermont/Eastbrook. See redlined site plan for clarification. Number:60 Created:4125/2006 Pending [10/3/06] Still ready for hearing ;). [4/25/06] No further comments. Ready for hearing. Page 3