Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBACON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2003 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5844 SOUTH TIMBERLINE ROAD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-03-03PROJECT 0Mi F-,- T SETEET C: v of Fnrt Callir.s XM ('.rrrent Planniiitfl D_� FE: January 2N. 2002 TO: Excel Energy PROJECT: ;1�5-02 2003 Elementary School - Site Plan Advisory Review -Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2002 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference a REQUEST 15' UTILITY EAS5MEiV7 AU)Ne, L✓L-ST frPd4 .SOUT'h` GDLJnP, cR1Ef OF Th`E PRUPC27 tP-TAl1l�T 7C3 ST$EET R`^.W 1 CAA n1S7R1QUTIUAI YSTr=1'7 WILL N,-ECn FZ2 LZE RL-IfV'CV1R_F_/d TO SEQUE FUTURE GLEMENTIW Y LOA4, !U(] TREE! 'TD EC PLAkT7:6 WITtt1 N -Y' LF FUTUNt Cri4S L/NGS IN PPDPOEFL7 EAJ9MEIVTJ • RECEIVED ruP,REN- PLANNING Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other 6a _Utility _Red.line Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins Mr. Ted Shepard 04/ 17/02 Page 6 Response: The striping plan shows the existing striping shaded back. The proposed striping will match into the existing. y-1-Striping Plan Scale should be 1"=30' per LCUASS 32.7.C. Response: The striping plan has been changed to F = 30'. -3`2" Where is the "Continental Crosswalk Bars" detail going? All crosswalks must be in accordance with LCUASS. Response: Addressed on plans. .33-The Timber Trail Road Intersection detail does not match what's shown on the plan view or the Timbers PUD. Please coordinate the plans to match. Response: Coordination with TST and Nolte has been ongoing. The plans should now all match. -Provide detail LCUASS 14-6, 7-20a,8-05,8-06,7-29a, 7-29b, 9-01,16-1,16-5,16-4c. Response: The details have been added to the detail sheets. -3-5-. The design for Arterials shall be continued 1000 feet beyond the end of the proposed construction. Westchase has the ultimate design all the way to Trilby... what about the north 100ft? Response: The ultimate design has been continued 1000 feet beyond the school property line. 36. LCUASS Tables 7-1, 7-3. Minimum sight distance at driveways and intersections on an Arterial is 1030'. Minimum distance between high volume driveways and intersections with a raised median is 660' measured between as the separations between centerlines. A variance request must be submitted in accordance with LCUASS 1.9.2. Response: Nolte Associates, Inc has provided a variance for the school driveway location on Timberline Road. -'9'The left turn bay must be designed in accordance with detail 8-06. Response: Addressed on plans. .38-Radial curb return radius must be in accordance with Table 8-2 and Land Use Code 3.6.6.D.4.g - t:he minimum turning radius for emergency fire access roads and in parking lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet inside and fifty (50) feet outside. Label all curb return radii on plans. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 7 Response: Addressed on plans. 39. Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a legend. Each sheet. Response: Addressed on plans. _4.0: Show existing features within 150' of the project limits — driveways, etc. Response: All known information within 150' of the project limits has been shown on the plans. Street Plan & Profile (Responses by David Evans & Assoc.) .1- Need to identify beginning and end of street taper. Identify if taper is "both sides" or one side only. Response: Addressed on plans. Show existing grades on the flowlines and tie proposed into it. Response: Addressed on plans. .3— Station all the inlets and curb returns. Response: Addressed on plans. Future Inlets by station 44+00 on the right and left flowlines — do we need them to construct now? Need to show how the design will work without them Response: Addressed on plans. The east inlet will be installed now. Runoff from the low point on the west side will drain to the ditch along the west side and into the existing 18" culvert. This culvert will be extended to the proposed storm system in the Timbers P.U.D. --5- Provide spot elevations in accordance with LCUASS detail 7-32b. Response: Addressed on plans. See redlines. Response: Addressed on plans. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/ 17/02 Page 8 2003 Elementary School Overall Utility Plan ,.10' Combine and submit the School and Timberline Road designs into one set. All comments and requirements regarding the Timberline design apply here as well. Response: Noted and these plans have been combined for this submittal. © Add note: "Concrete to property line" on all drive entrances to the school. Response: Noted and this note has been added to the Horizontal Control Plan. 6DJ4*,Fsr— 5iWWa' -ts,�r .1p rlvt�- How will the future inlet by others on Timberline and Timber Trail (?) work with your drainage design if not in by the time you go to construction? Response: The "future inlets" have been noted as "proposed" and will be constructed as part of the street improvement plans and storm sewer system for the elementary school. ornu.44kow,.Y �c5`�17rVRF�" y Ag p at �S�t 4. No drainage liom the berm over sidewalk along Timberline. Sheetflow should go from back of sidewalk into ROW, and then r.o.w into the property. Response: Runoff from the bermed areas along Timberline will be collected in the curb inlet north of the school curb return and routed to the on -site detention pond. A variance request is included in this submittal. �S. See redlines. Is a manhole required where the proposed 18" CMP (must replace with RCP) joins the existing pipe in Timberline? Also, the invert elevation does not match the elevation given on the Westchase PUD plans. Please coordinate the design with Westchase PUD and The Timbers PUD so that everything matches. Response: Per our meeting with Basil Hamdan of Storm Water Utilities, this 18" CMP is to be abandoned and removed. This is noted on the street improvement plans. The proposed storm sewer within Zephyr Road (a.k a. Timber Trail Road) has been extended to the west side of Timberline for future connection. Construction coordination has been performed with the contractor, CFC Engineering, and developers. 6 >adial curb return radius must be in accordance with Table 8-2. Label all curb return radii on plans. Response: A variance request will be provided as part of this submittal for the curb return radii. Refer to the Horizontal Control Plan for curb return information. YVkt66UVr yJr-- igh volume drive not permitted in the parent/student drop off parking lot. Must be designed m accordance with LCUASS 7-29a. we --ter, NOI-TE ASSOCIATES. INIC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 9 Response: A variance request will be provided as part of this submittal for a high volume driveway because of the high volume of traffic generated by the parent/student drop- off. \&42.4d..A6& QToQ -Flat.�eJS �.. -.�&--Provide spot elevations in accordance with LCUASS detail 7-32b. Response: Noted'. and are shown on the improvement plans. -9--'%Qove the midblock pedestrian ramp on Timber Trail to the west side of Regal Road to match up with the Timbers PUD crossing. See redlines. Response: Noted and are shown on the improvement plans. f@- Jpdate outdated details, coordinate and combine plan sets with the Timberline Road Improvements. Response: Noted and are shown on the improvement plans. 11. Show existing, and proposed property lines, easement buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. nclude a le end. Each sheet. -r:, la► C, P %rz�, 17r0 1 Response: Noted and are shown on the improvement plans. t7rGYL SDo% -i-3 abel the Bioswale - must be contained inside the school's property line, no portion of it -%CZ may be constructed in the public ROW. Response: Due to site grading constraints, the bio-swale has been eliminated from the improvement plans. Site Plan (Responses by RB+B Architects) _ w_ o*Please dimension all parking spaces. 1q-64 fpgs Response: Dimensioning ofparkkingspaces is not appropriate on the Landscape Site Plan. They are dirr ensioned on the civil horizontal control sheet HCO1. It is our policy not to dimension anything twice as the chance for errors increases drastically if this is done. Please refer the Civil Utility Improvement plans. 2. Label proposed features, future modulars, etc. Response: Completed. 3. Show existing and proposed property lines, e-4=��..�c building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled. Include a legend. ach sheet. >AEOa -a� NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 10 Response: This is all shown on Civil Sheets. It is our policy not to show this information twice as it is not applicable to the Landscape Contractor and it makes the chance for errors increase. � �-W%e' W (L S S -akS . vNtYiK- '!;4� 4. Coord�e Site plan with the Utility sheet comments. �L7 W�p1� Response: See responses to Utility sheets. Again, it is our policy not to show this information twice due to increase of errors and the Landscape Contractor does not need this-.a5 information. J* -J. Show and label detention pond and fencing. Response: Completed. 6. Remove grading layer. Response: Completed. 7. See redlines. Response: Completed. �Z jk(�p>pett� Ft�tit�0 S IVA r-;QkY 406 t AMOV7C '�e� pw:. Landscape Plan (Response by Tam Wahl - Landscape Architect) 1. Provide a Legend. Response: Completed "Bep * Lxmr, '!5H M j I "fir 2. Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a legend. Response: See response under Site Plan S��D 4rQAS. muS r. sty dV 3. Incorporate comments from the site and utility plans. Response: See response under Site Plan -4- Landscaping must be in accordance with Division 3.2.1 of the Land Use Code. Response: Completed 5. Show and label detention pond/fencing. .6k),f� k 4,4S u ej - �fXLStt�- (a2- vVit, kT4 PL AC-LS NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 11 Response: Completed 6. Landscape Plan: See redlines. Response: Completed "Tno-W l r 6ex- m. f s V+. k&\-V' -M CoArAtA%"' Stormwater Utility Topic: Basin Delineation Comment 27: Please provide a basin size and tributary area to the west. This area should be allowed to pass through bypassing the pond at the 100-yr. historic rate. Response: Per our meeting on February 7a 2002, the proposed storm sewer within Zephyr Road (a.k.a., Timber Trail Road) has been extended to the west side of Timberline for future connection. Construction coordination has been performed with the contractor, CFC Engineering, and developers. Topic: Detention Pond Overflow Comment 24: Please provide a design for the water quality pond outlet structure. Make sure that there is an overflow design that allows larger flows to bypass the water quality outlet release point. Design and show location of spillway. Account for what happens during, larger storms where the spillway operates. Check for flooding potential through the Timbers and Westchase. Response: A water quality/detention pond outlet structure has been designed to the required release; rates and is shown on the Utility Improvement Plans. This detention pond is below the adjacent street/sidewalk grade, thus the spillway would be the overtopping of the sidewalk and onto the adjacent street. The 100-yr. pond elevation has been calculated to be 4949.25 with the sidewalk grade approximately at 4952.3. The pond will have approximately 3 more feet of additional storage (2.82 ac-ft) before spilling onto Zephyr Road. This additional storage volume is approximately three times the required storage of 0.93 ac-ft. If the detention pond were to overtop, storm water would be collected into the proposed inlet within Zephyr Road adjacent to the pond. If the inlet were to be plugged, the storm water in Zephyr Road would overtop the high point and continue east to the next storm sewer inlet. No structures within the Timbers PUD would be at risk of flooding (per phone conversation with Eric Fuhrman of TST Consulting Engineers). Topic: Detention Pond Release Rate Comment 26: The detention pond was sized using a release rate of 25.1 cfs per the Timbers drainage report. Please provide documentation that the off -site facilities from the Timbers PUD to the ultimate outfall through the Westchase property have enough capacity to be able to handle such flows. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/ 17/02 Page 12 The off -site areas from the north and from the west are being currently routed to the detention pond at the 100-yr historical rate without taking these into account in the Timbers outfall pipe capacity. If your site is releasing at 25.1 cfs this would leave no capacity whatsoever for these off -site areas. Response: This comment has been addressed per our meeting on February 7`h, 2002. Topic: Erosion Control Comment 25: The plan index of drawings shows the wrong plan page designation for the grading/erosion control plan. Response: Noted. and the plan has been corrected. Comment 25 continued: The report states that erosion control matting will be utilized at curb cuts and storm sewer outlet locations prior to the final grading and landscaping of the site. Please indicate these BMPs on the plan and explain the sequencing of the BMPs as you indicate them in the report through notes on the plan. Response: Curb cuts have been eliminated from the site plan and riprap is to be installed at the storm sewer outfall locations. The sequencing of the BMPs has been included in the report and standard erosion notes added to the plans. Comment 25 continued: Please put a note on the plans as to the manner of final stabilization of disturbed areas not under paving or building (e.g. the detention pond, is to be reseeded and with what, sodded, etc.) Response: Noted and refer the Landscape Plan. Comment 25 continued: Please provide PS, EFF, surety calculations. Response: Noted and provided in the Final Drainage Report. Topic: Off -site Flows Comment 21: Flows from the north of the site are routed through the on -site pond. It would be better if these flows remained off-line. Response: This comment has been addressed per our meeting on February 7 s, 2002. Topic: Plat Comment 23: Please provide a Plat for the proposed site. The detention pond as well as all storm sewer and other drainage facilities should be placed in drainage easements. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 13 Response: Poudre School District prefers to dedicate easements by separate documents rather than going through the platting process. Topic: Private Storm Line Comment 16: The storm sewer on Timber Trail is carrying off -site flows from the east; it will need to be sized to accommodate 100-yr. historic off -site flows. Additionally, the line is now shown to be on the school district property. Why not extend the storm sewer being built in the ROW by the Timbers development further west rather than have a parallel line built on private property as the plans currently show. The Timbers line might have to be upsized to take care of the street and offsite flows. Response: This comment has been addressed per our meeting on February 7`h, 2002. Topic: Timber Trail Inlets Comment 22: Inlets on Timber Trails should be directed at a public storm sewer system rather than a private line owned and maintained by the school district. Response: This comment has been addressed per our meeting on February 7111, 2002. Topic: Timberline Road Improvements Comment 18: Please provide street capacity calculations for Timberline Road. Response: Noted and provide in the Final Drainage Report. Comment 18 continued: There is a low point on Timberline Road that is to the north of the proposed improvements. The plans call for a future 10-$. Type R Her but there is no sizing that was done and the plans do not show what will happen to the street flows in the interim condition. Response: This comment has been addressed per our meeting on February Vh, 2002. Sizing calculations have been provided in the Final Drainage and this inlet is "proposed" as to be constructed as part of the street improvement and school improvement plans. Comment 18 continued: The existing 18" CMP pipe under Timberline is shown to be merely extended. The City does not allow CMP under the ROW; this pipe will need to be removed and replaced with and RCP culvert. It will be sized such that it would be able to handle the 100-yr. historic flows. No bends are allowed in the storm sewer without a manhole, please correct. Response: This comment has been addressed per our meeting on February 7`h, 2002. This 18" CMP is to be abandoned and removed. This is noted on the street improvement plans. The proposed storm sewer within Zephyr Road (a.k.a. Timber Trail Road) has been extended to the west side of Timberline for future connection (per the Timbers Utility NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 14 Improvement Plans by TST Consulting Engineers). Construction coordination has been performed with the contractor, CFC Engineering, and developers. Thank you for your review and approval of these plans and responses. If you need further clarification on any of the above responses, please call me (419-1316) at your convenience. Sincerely, Nolte Associates, Inc. I j C1 Thomas Ochwat, RE:. Senior Engineer NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Project Comments Sheet Citv of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: February 27, 2002 Project: 2003 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW #5-02 All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General 28 See attached. Z 7/7 Z,- Dal CHECKUM "OU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ I Site t Drainage Report Other Z Utility _ Z_ Redline Utility I Landscape Page 1 PROJECT (M6�nz C Wd fV[E T -HEET City of Fort CcEin, t'urrent Pl.utni❑<� DIT': Januarys. 2200? TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #5-02 2003 Elementary School - Site Plan Advisory Review - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2002 Note - Please identify vour redlines for future reference he 4-,e r� ✓�, h Nance (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Utility _Site Drainage Report _Other _Redline Utility _Landscape 4� �� Citv of Fort Collins #5-02 2003 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 02127102 General Comments: Please combine and submit the School and Timberline Road designs into one set. Coordinate all sheets, including Landscape and Site, so that all sheets match and present the same information. Since you are not platting, you will need to provide ROW, utility easements, and temporary construction easements on the west side of Timberline by separate document as well as additional ROW and utility easements for the east side of TimberlinesbY��� separate document. YY 'nvr�w�a-rm�n�-. 0�7- Is the school making the full road width improvements including the c/g/sidewalk on the west side of Timberline? We4+4&s�Cross sections indicate a c/g/sidewalk going in but the plan view does not show these improvements. �cec}crired-on-tlre��est'sic�e. Phasing issues -'Timber Trail must be constructed by the project that goes first, the Timbers PUD or the school. Coordinate the utility connections in Timber Trail with the Timbers PUD to avoid future street cuts. Contact TST at 970-226-0557. Provide directional ramps at Timber Trail Road & Timberline Road, the private drive off of Timberline and the private drive off Timber Trail Road. Line up the crosswalks and the ped refuge in the medians with the ramps. All crosswalks must be in accordance with the city's street standards, see detail 8-05, 7-21. Section 3.6.6.0 of the Land Use Code — Building Placement: All portions of the exterior wall of the first story of any structure must be located within one hundred fifty (150) feet of a public street (except major arterial streets) or an approved fire access road in which fire apparatus can be maneuvered. It appears that the structure exceeds the 150' limit. Timberline Road Improvement Plan LCUASS 3.2.1 Complete and submit the Checklist in Appendix E-4. Correct the misspelling in the legal description below the project name. LCUASS 3.2.7.E Vicinity Map 1"=1,000-1,500' LCUASS 3.2.12 Legend of Symbols — each sheet shall include a legend that identifies the symbols pertaining to the sheet. LCUASS 3.3.1 Cover sheet requirements: A. Provide the General Notes, Appendix E-1. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate information. B. Provide a typical street section for Timber Trail Roadov caeA6t lG-th P a+%SEs' D. Engineer/Owner Contacts: Provide the name, address and phone number of the owner/developer,. F. Indemnification Statement: The indemnification statement shall be shown on the cover sheet. Annotate as shown 3.3.IT, H. Provide a Legend of Symbols. LCUASS 3.3.2 ]Provide the Construction Notes, Appendix E-2. Please provide a Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile sheet. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.1 Show existing and proposed property and or/ right-of-way lines, easements, and/or tracts. Type and dimension of easement or tract is to be clearly labeled. Dimensions of property and right-of-way lines are to be marked. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.2. Survey lines and stationing lines shall normally be based on centerline of street: other profiles may be included but shall be referenced to centerline stationing. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.3. Existing utilities and structures (shown as phantom lines), including, but not limited to: See section. LCUASS 3.3.4.10. Storm drainage flow direction arrows, particularly at intersections and all high and low points. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.9. Station and elevation of all horizontal curves including PI, PC's, PT's, etc.; high and low point and PI of all vertical curves; existing and proposed, centerline bearings, distances, and complete curve data. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.10. Curb return radii, existing and proposed. Stations and elevations of all curb returns; mid -point elevations and additional locations necessary, flowline- flowline intersection elevations, and percent of grade from the PCR to flowline-flowline intersections of all crosspans. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.12. Centerline stations of all proposed driveways and all intersection roadways. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.13. Survey tie lines to section corners or quarter corners. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.15. Intersections. Any roadway intersections shall include construction and lane details for the new construction and existing facilities for a minimum of 150' beyond the limits of construction. LCUASS 3.3.4.B.1. Label existing and proposed grades. ,.�. 1 LCUASS 3.3.4. %1, The oss sections shall indicate: type of roadway, profile grade design poi centerl' , flow -line, TOC, LOG, etc) roadway width, type of curb/ utter/walk. avement thickness, structural material components of the pavement, e and sub) . LCUASS 3.3.6. See this section for striping plan requirements. All permanent and temporary traffic signing and pavement markings shall be shown on the signing and striping plan, with the existing and proposed street system used as the base layout. Locations of signs and pavement markings shall be indicated by station/offset, or other specific dimensions indicating exact locations. This sheet shall also contain any construction or application notes. Provide an area map, section A. See 3.3.6.B,C,D for additional requirements. Striping Plan: Show how the proposed striping will tie into the existing striping on Timberline Road south of Timber Trail Road. Striping Plan Scale should be 1"=30' per LCUASS 3.2.7.C. Where is the "Continental Crosswalk Bars" detail going? All crosswalks must be in accordance with LCUASS. The Timber Traia Road Intersection detail does not match what's shown on the plan view or the Timbers P LTD. Please coordinate the plans to match. Provide detail LCUASS 14-6, 7-20a,8-05,7-29a,7-29b,9-01,16-1,16-5,16-4c. 'raP La� u 1. � ws oft, (eC- LT V- cfz_ r " Post sac.Gb [ C t ASS 7. A.8 he er ' e and ground lines of all Arterials shall be continued 1000 fact bev' d the (I of it proposed construction. Westchase has the ultimate design all he - to 1 . I ('t'ASS TableS 7-I. 7-3. Minimum sight distance at driveways and intersections on an Arterial is 1030'. Minimum distance between high vohnne driveways and intersections with a raised median is 660' measured between as the separations between centerlines. A variance rcqucst must be submitted in accordance with LCUASS 1.9.2. Radial curb return radius must be in accordance with Table 8-2 and Land Use Code 3.6.6.D.4.g - the minimum turning radius for emergency fire access roads and in parking lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet inside and fifty (50) feet outside. Label all curb return radii on plans. The ordinance was adopted 12/18,01 and the plans were submitted 1/24 02, Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a legend. Each sheet. -S40w 0" -rs4E woasr 4-i52- oG nvi9 2v. Cp2 ��w«<5t Street Plan & Profile �nU:rn Need to identify beginning and end of street taper. Identify if taper is "both sides" or one 9�rr— side only. Show existing grades on the flowlines and tie proposed into it. Station the all inlets and curb returns. Future Inlets by station 44-00 on the right and left flo«vlines do we need them to construct now? Need to show how the design will work without them. Provide spot elevations in accordance with LCUASS detail 7-32b. See redlines. 2003 Elementary School Overall Utility Plan Combine and submit the School and Timberline Road designs into one set. All comments and requirements regarding the Timberline design apply here as well. Add note: "Concrete to property line" on all drive entrances to the school. How will the future inlet by others on Timberline work with your drainage design if not in by the ' e you6. o to construction? ���''t�' No 'na e er sidewa alon T erli Shee ow s uld o om ck of ewalk o ROW, d then g .w int e pro rty �tp See redlines. Is a manhole required where the proposed 18" CMP joins the existin pipe in Timberline? Also, the invert elevation does not match the elevation given on the Westchase PUD plans. Please coordinate the design with Westchase PUD and The Timbers PUD so that everything matches. Radial curb return radius must be in accordance with Table 8-2. Label all curb return radii on plans. High volume drive not permitted in the parent/student drop off parking lot. Must be designed in accordance with LCUASS 7-29a. Provide spotelevationsin accordance with LCT d ail Move the4pe°cesstrian ramp Ito the, est v7v;lk N U? Wrtta PLA-> KC, • SEA pug Update outdated details, coordinate and combine plan sets with the Timberline Road Improvements. Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a legend. Each sheet. Label the Bioswa.le — must be contained inside the school's property line, no portion of it may be constructed in the public ROW. Site Plan Please dimensionall parking spaces. Label proposed features, future modulars, etc. Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled. Include a legend. Each sheet. Coordinate the �Site plan with the Utility sheet comments. ALi"�LA"b6e' s AAVJ Landscape Plan Provide a Legend. Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a legend. Incorporate comments from the site and utility plans. Landscaping must be in accordance with Division 3.2.1 of the Land Use Code. Landscape Plan: See redlines. I.Ue OF 6ilrt L�— � �J 'TD C I, O •.le, 60 o,v� uy TTJ� -cam,, V t calG-sue tjLpPGi S7• 20 oaVl �/°/a �QOI)►1Df�D 1�� �jl.pery�✓�l.Fi: �{.00 Gj'1.`7'1 �!i C-0/ram e,� B E Y O N D E N G I N E E R I N G May 29, 2002 Mr. "Fed Shepard Senior Planner Current Planning Division City Of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80524 SUBJECT: Response to City of Fort Collins Comments dated May 1, 2002 Proposed 2003 Elementary School — Timberline Site Site Plan Advisory Review, #5-02 Dear Mr. Shepard: This letter is in response to the comments received from the City of Fort Collins (Engineering and Storm Water Departments). Specific responses are in the order of each comment sheet and reference the note number where applicable. 2003 Elementary School Overall Utility Plan 1. Resolved 2. Add note: "Concrete to property line" on all drive entrances to the school. Response: This note has been added to the Horizontal Control Plan. 3. I Iow will the future inlet by others on Timberline and Timbertrail (?) work with your drainage design if not in by the time you go to construction? Response: Corrected labeling. Now shown as proposed. 4. No drainage from the berm over sidewalk along Timberline. Sheet flow should go from back of sidewalk into ROW, and then b.o.w. into the property. Response: We are awaiting the response to the variance request. 5. Resolved 6. Radial curb return radius must be in accordance with Table 8-2. Label all curb return radii on plans. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. 1901 SHARP POINT DRIVE. SUITE A IOPT COLLINS. CD 90525 9/0 :]I 2100 TEL 970. 221.2415 FAX WWW NOLTE CON Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 2 Response: Note added at Timberline and Zephyr on Horizontal Control Plan. We are waiting on the response to the variance request submitted for the Timberline entrance. High volume drive not permitted in the parent/student drop off parking lot. Must be designed in accordance with LCUASS 7-29a. Response: This entrance meets the peak hour volume requirements. 8. Resolved 9. Resolved 10. Resolved 11. Show Existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a Legend. Each Sheet. Response: Noted and addressed 12. Resolved 13. Since you will be keeping the set separate, please provide a typical street section for Zephyr Road. See the Timberline Road Improvement Plans for example, but don't label it "NIC". Response: Added to sheet DT03. 14. Relabel sheet CV02 to be called "General Notes" as shown in the index. Response: Noted. and shown on CV02 15. General note 48 — Correction on A, possible B and C to be added. See redlines. Response: Noted and addressed 16. This was bubbled on the first set or redlines- the ramp at Regal and Zephyr is to big — Must be designed in accordance with 16-4a. It can match the width of the sidewalk, or in this case be 8' max. Response: This ramp is to be used for emergency access and has been designed in accordance with 7-29a. The Poudre Fire Authority determined the width dimension of this ramp. 17. Call out Gravel Pave areas as noted on the landscape plan. Show the concrete crosswalk areas in the bus parking lot as shown on the landscape plan. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 3 Response: Note and hatching are shown on the Horizontal Control Plan. 18. Parking spaces must be designed in accordance with detail 19-04 of LCUASS Response: Parking spaces are designed to long term parking specifications. 19. Show right hand turn lane on Timberline into Zephyr. Response: Noted. and addressed. 20. Correction to note 42, Sheet HC01. Response: Noted'. and addressed. Site Plan Please Dimension all parking spaces. Repeat. Parking spaces must be designed in accordance with detail 19-04 of LCUASS. Please see 19-04 for length and width requirements. Response: Noted. Parking spaces are designed to long term parking specifications. 2. Label proposed features, future modulars, etc. Still need to show soccer fields. Response: Noted and addressed. 3. Show existing and proposed property line, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones. ROW etc.. properly labeled. Include a legend. Each sheet. Repeat. Show line weights for fencing, ROW, easements, etc. Must match the utility plans. Response: Noted and addressed. 4. Coordinate the Site plan with the Utility sheet comments. Repeat. The utility, landscape and site plans are not coordinated. Several conflicts noted. Response: Noted. 5. Show and label detention pond and fencing. Doesn't match Landscape plans, Which is correct'? Response: Noted and addressed. NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 4 6. Resolved. 7. See redlines. I was not given my redlines back from the first submittal, therefore I was unable to verify that all comments were addressed. Response: Noted.. 8. 050102: No monument signs are allowed in the utility easement. Please move it back out of the easement. Response: Noted and addressed. 9. 050102: The ROW and utility easements shown do not match what is shown on the Utility plans. Please correct. Response: Noted and coordinated. 10. 050102: The ramp at Regal and Zephyr is too big — must be designed in accordance with 16- 4a. This is a repeat comment from the Utility comment section. Response: This ramp is to be used for emergency access and has been designed in accordance with 7-29a. 11. 050102: The high volume drive in the parent/student parking lot is not allowed. Please coordinate with the Utility plans to show the standard drive cut. Repeat comment from the Utility plans. Response: This entrance meets the peak hour volume requirements. 12. 050102: "Ramp by Others" label is incorrect. This must be constructed with this project Response: Noted and addressed. 13. 050102: Show concrete limits in the bus parking lot. Response: Noted and addressed. 14. 050102: Show right turn lane off Timberline. Must match The Timbers project. Response: Noted and addressed. 15. 050102: The City of Fort Collins requires that the information I've asked for be clearly shown on the Site Plan and that they match the Utility and Landscape plans. Your in-house NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 5 policy is understandable, however these comments will remain unresolved and the plans unapproved until the plans are brought into compliance. Response: Noted Landscape Plan Provide a Legend. Need a legend for the public improvements. Repeat. Show ROW. Easements, el.c., See redlines. See Site Plan comments. Response: Noted and addressed. 2. Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a legend. Repeat. Response: Noted and addressed. 3. Incorporate comments from the Site and Utility Plans. Plans do not match. Response: Noted and addressed. 4. Resolved. 5. Show and label detention pond/fencing. Labeling doesn't match what's shown on the Site Plan. Which is correct? Response: Noted and coordinated. 6. Landscape Plan: See redlines. Did not receive the redlines from the first submittal. Unable to verify if this was resolved. Please see other miscellaneous comments and questions noted on the redlines. Response: Noted and addressed. 7. 050102: The 'high volume drive in the parent/student parking lot is not allowed. Please coordinate with the Utility plans to show the standard drive cut. Repeat comment from the Utility plans. Response: This entrance meets the peak hour volume requirements. 8. 050102: The ramp at Regal and Zephyr is too big — must he designed in accordance with 16- 4a. This is a repeat comment from the Utility comment section. NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 6 Response: This pimp is to be used for emergency access and has been designed in accordance with 7-29a. 9. 050102: Show the soccer and baseball fields. Response: Noted and addressed. 10. 050102: Show all utilities. Our standards require this so that we can verify that you are meeting the separation requirements between the utilities and the trees, etc. Response: Noted and addressed. 11. 050102: The City of Fort Collins requires that the information I've asked for be clearly shown on the Site Plan and that they match the Utility and Landscape plans. Your in-house policy is understandable, however these comments will remain unresolved and the plans unapproved until the plans are brought into compliance. Response: Noted Stormwater 102. The plans for the Timberline Road Improvements show the existing culvert under Timberline to be extended and tied into the school's drainage system, while your plans show that the pipe is to be abandoned and removed. Please revise your plans to be consistent with the Timberline Road Improvements Plan. Response: The Timberline Road Improvements show the existing culvert to be removed. The storm system in Zephyr Road is to be extended to the west of Timberline Road as part of the Timbers P.U.D. This is reflected in the plans. 100. The section of pipe between SDI 200 and SDI 201 has very minimal cover; please increase cover on pipe to maintain a 1-foot minimum. Response: Noted. 18. Please provide street capacity calculations for Timberline Road. -There is a low point on Timberline Road that is to the north of the proposed improvements. The plans call for a future 10' Type R inlet but there is no sizing that was done and the plans do not show what will happen to street flows in the interim condition. -The existing 18" CMP under Timberline is shown to be merely extended. The City does not allow CMP under the ROW, this pipe will need to be removed and replaced with and RCP culvert. It will need to be sized such that it would be able to handle historic 100-year flows. -No bends are allowed in the storm sewer without a manhole, please correct. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT (in.� COMMENT SHEET City of Font Collins Current Planninfy DATE: January 28, 2002 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #5-02 2003 Elementary School - Site Plan Advisory Review - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Name (please print) CIIECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site Drainage Report _Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape 6a City of Fort Collins Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 7 Response: The street capacity calculations have been provided in the drainage report and correspond to design point 400. The inlet has been designed to capture the 10-yr storm and is reflected in the drainage report. During the interim condition, flows will travel in historic patterns into the undeveloped basins 401 and runoff will be picked up in the parking lot inlet at D.P. 200. The Timberline Road Improvements show the existing culvert to be removed. The storm system in Zephyr Road is to be extended to the west of Timberline Road as part of the Timbers P.U.D. This is reflected in the plans. 103.- Please show the Timbers extended pipe on Zephyr and across Timberline to the West. Currently these plans do not show the pipe that is to be extended across Timberline as per the revised Timbers utility plan set. -The proposed 10-foot inlet on the east side of Timberline needs to be tied into the school's storm sewer system. Please indicate on the plans which of the two projects will build this inlet and the tie; will it be done by the road project or the school project? -Inlet design on the Timberline Road: the inlet on the east side of Timberline flow should be designed to carry the 10 year flow through the inlet, while in the 100 year, since Timberline is an arterial street the encroachment in the street should be such that it leaves at least one lane open in each direction. Please design the inlet on Timberline Road and the pipe to meet these design requirements. Response: The Timberline Road Improvements show the existing culvert to be removed. The storm system in Zephyr Road is to be extended to the west of Timberline Road as part of the Timbers P. U.D. This is reflected in the plans. The inlet will be built as part of the road improvements. The inlet has been designed to accept the 10-year runoff as well as the 100-year runoff. During the major storm the water spread is 21.24' that will encroach the remaining lane by 1.24'-leaving a lane width of approximately 1 I' free of water. Timberline Road Improvement Plan (Responses provided by David Evans & Associates) 1. Resolved. 2. Resolved. 3. Resolved. 4. LCUASS 3.2.12 Legend of Symbols — each sheet shall include a legend that identifies the symbols pertaining to the sheet. The legend is missing on a few sheets. NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 8 Response: A legend has been added to all of the sheets. 5. LCUASS 3.3.1 Cover sheet requirements: A. Provide the General Notes, Appendix E-1. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate information. Need to update, there are currently 48 notes. Can download off the web site or call me and I can email. Response: The latest General Notes were emailed to us by the City of Fort Collins. They have been incorporated into the Construction Plans. B. Resolved, C. Resolved. D. Resolved. E. Resolved. 15. Resolved. 16. Resolved. 17. Resolved, 18. Resolved. 19. Resolved. 20. Resolved. 21. Resolved. 22. Resolved. 23. Resolved. 24. Resolved. 25. Resolved. 26. Resolved. 27. Resolved. 28. Resolved. 29. Resolved. 30. Resolved. 31. Resolved. 32. Resolved. 33. Resolved. 34. Resolved. 35. Resolved. 36. LCUASS Tables 7-1, 7-3. Minimum sight distance at driveways and intersections on an Arterial is 1030'. Minimum distance between high volume driveways and intersections with a raised median is 660' measured between as the separations between centerlines. A variance request must be submitted in accordance with LCUASS 1.9.2. Did not receive the variance request as noted in the response letter. NOLTE ASSOCIATES. INC. Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 9 Response: Nolte Associates, Inc is making the variance request. The letter is included with this submittal. 37. Resolved. 38. Radial curb return radius must be in accordance with Table 8-2 and Land Use Code 3.6.6.D.4.g — the minimum turning radius for emergency fire access roads and in parking lots shall be twenty- five (25) feet inside and fifty (50) feet outside. Label all curb return radii on plans. The radius on the NE corner of Timberline and Zephyr needs to he 25' according to table 8-2, LCUIISS. Currently shown as a 30'. Response: The radius at the NE corner has been changed to a 25' radius. 39. Show existing and proposed property lines, easements, building envelopes, buffer zones, ROW, etc., properly labeled and dimensioned. Include a legend. Each sheet. Response: All known property lines, easements, buildings, etc. have been shown. 40. Resolved. Street Plan & Profile (Responses provided by David Evans & Associates) 1. Resolved. 2. Resolved. 3. Resolved. 4. Sheet 5-Future Inlets by station 44+00 on the right and left flowlines — do we need them to construct now? Need to show how the design will work without them. .''how the inlet on the west side of Timberline as" proposed" instead of `.future" as it will be required with the ultimate design. Response: The inlet on the west side is shown as proposed for the ultimate design. It is not shown for the interim design. 5. Resolved. 6. Resolved. 7. 050102: Rename sheets 2 and 3 to General Notes and General Notes, Cont'd or the third page could also be called Construction Notes. Response: The sheet names have been changed. 8. 050102: Sheet 4 — sidewalks need to match the School plans. See redlines. Response: The latest school plans have been incorporated into the drawing so the sidewalk now matches their plans. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard May 29, 2002 Page 10 9. 050102: Sheet 6 — It appears that you need an easement for the riprap and drainage on the west side of Timberline as well as a temporary construction easement. Response: The interim drainage is designed to stay within the existing ROW. The soil riprap can be placed without leaving the ROW. The ultimate drainage design will be directed into inlets within the street and conveyed to existing storm systems. Therefore, the ultimate design stays within the ultimate ROW. 10. 050102: Sheet 7,8 — See redlines for correction to the Crosswalk Markings Note. If there is a study required, then it should be required now, not after the plans are approved. Response: The crosswalk note was corrected per the redlines. Thank you for your review and approval of these plans and responses. If you need further clarification on any of the above responses, please call me (419-1316) at your convenience. Sincerely, Nolte Associates, Inc. Thomas Ochwat, P.E. Senior Engineer NOETE ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT (a-� COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current PlanninE DATE: March 8, 2002 TO: Technical Svcs. PROJECT: #5-02A 2003 Elementary School and The Timbers Annexation & Zoning All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: April 10, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference -6auA)bR-P-1I� I.E,CgALC _0siG f�*M tC Q ' t_f ` �;y�tPtloj 12 th Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Citv of Fort Collins B E Y O N D E N G I N E E R I N G April 17, 2002 FC019501 Mr. Ted Shepard, Senior Planner Current Planning Division City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80524 SUBJECT: Response to City of Fort Collins Comments dated February 27, 2002 Proposed 2003 Elementary School — Timberline Site Site Plan Advisory Review, #5-02 Dear: Mr. Shepard: This letter is in response to the comments received from the City of Fort Collins and other entities. Specific responses are in the order of each comment sheet for each department and reference the note number where applicable. Fort Collins -Loveland Water District / South Fort Collins Sanitation District — Response • We will continue to meet and coordinate with the District on water line issues. Excel Energy • A note has been added to the landscape plan stating that no trees shall be located within 4 feet of gas mains and services. Engineering Department - Responses General: _1+ Please combine and submit the School and Timberline Road designs into one set. Response: Noted'.. 2. Coordinate all sheets, including Landscape and Site, so that all sheets match and present the same information. Response: Landscape Plan and Site Plan are typically submitted as separate sheets to the Civil Improvement Plans. VOLT _T,4 iH +vWlsr _T� <kY►r� t t t Be- pt�.147t�, " eA emF �r LCt lCS . 3. Since you are not platting, you will need to provide ROW, utility easements, and temporary construction easements on the west side of Timberline by separate document as well as NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. 1901 SHARP POINT DR VE.SUITE A FORT COLLINS, CO 00`25 970.221 2400 TEL 970.221 2415 FAX WWW. NOLTE COM Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 2 additional ROW and utility easements for the east side of Timberline and the north side of Timber Trail by separate document. Response: R-O-W and easement documents will be provided as separate documents at a later date. 4Ge-t, Az-.&, ° Is the school making the full road width improvements including the c/g/sidewalk on the west side of Timberline? Cross sections indicate a c/g/sidewalk going in but the plan view does not show these improvements. If so, ROW and easements required on the west side. Response: The east half of Timberline Road will be designed and constructed per the City's direction. 5. Phasing issues - Timber Trail must be constructed by the project that goes first, the Timbers PUD or the school. LZ-4e,(t*46 evfAMZ. 4T t,.l, 7 Response: Coordination with the developer (Byron Collins) of The Timbers is ongoing and construction agreements between PSD and Mr. Collins has addressed this comment. -fir—Coordinate the utility connections in Timber Trail with the Timbers PUD to avoid future street cuts. Contact TST at 970-226-0557. Response: Ongoing coordination with TST Consultants regarding the utility stubs has been made throughout this project. —i.' rovide directional ramps at Timber Trail Road & Timberline Road, the private drive off of Timberline and the private drive off Timber Trail Road. Line up the crosswalks and the ped refuge in the: medians with the ramps. All crosswalks must be in accordance with the city's street standards, see detail 8-05, 7-21. Response: Noted and are shown on the improvement plans. —$" Section 3.6.6.0 of the Land Use Code — Building Placement: All portions of the exterior wall of the first story of any structure must be located within one hundred fifty (150) feet of a public street (except major arterial streets) or an approved fire access road in which fire apparatus can be maneuvered. It appears that the structure exceeds the 150' limit. Response: This comment has been addressed by several meetings with Poudre Fire Authority (Ron Gonzales). Fire lane access and the implementation of a building sprinkler system and fire hydrant locations have provided their acceptance to this comment. —9" Please see comments from Larimer County Engineering on the Timbers PUD. There are some comments that apply to this project. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 3 Response: Noted. Timberline Road Improvement Plan (Responses by David Evans & Assoc.) .1e9' LCUASS 3.2.1 Complete and submit the Checklist in Appendix E-4. Response: The checklist has been completed and is a part of this submittal. -t- ' orrect the misspelling in the legal description below the project name. Response: Addressed on plans. .42'LCUASS 3.2.7.E Vicinity Map 1"=1,000 — 11500' Response: The Vicinity Map has been changed to a scale of 1 "=1000'. 13. LCUASS 3.2.12 Legend of Symbols — each sheet shall include a legend that identifies the symbols pertaining to the sheet. t om, yyttSSt� 1G G+�-1 1SGAJJ4A4-- 5M Response: Addressed on plans. 41.4-LCUASS 3.3.1 Cover sheet requirements: A. Provide the General Notes, Appendix E-1. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate information. 49 -voK, , 0"L>-4 �+r-i6 S45 Response: Addressed on plans. B. Provide a typical street section for Timber Trail Road when the plan sets are combined. -jOnu� uleoeitt�- bwA 1jC.�Ct7C, ( LA"S Response: Addressed on plans with notation that designates the limits of construction for Timberline and Zephyr Roads (which is not a part of this contract). 'f-Engineer/Owner Contacts: Provide the name, address and phone number of the owner/developer. Response: Addressed on plans. —9-Indemnification Statement: The indemnification statement shall be shown on the cover sheet. Annotate as shown 3.3.11. Response: Addressed on plans. provide a Legend of Symbols. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 4 Response: Addressed on plans. 15. LCUASS 3.3.2 Provide the Construction Notes, Appendix E-2. Response: Addressed on plans. —.6—Please provide a Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile sheet. Response: No sarutary sewer proposed within Timberline Road. .1-�-LCUASS 3.3.4.A.1. Show existing and proposed property and or/ right-of-way lines, easements, and/or tracts. Type and dimension of easement or tract is to be clearly labeled. Dimensions of property and right-of-way lines are to be marked. Response: ROW and property lines are labeled and dimensioned. 4-9--LCUASS 3.3.4.A.2. Survey lines and stationing lines shall normally be based on centerline of street: other profiles may be included but shall be referenced to centerline stationing. Response: All stationing is based on the centerline. 49--LCUASS 33.4.A3. Existing utilities and structures (shown as phantom lines), including, but not limited to: See section. Response: All known existing utilities and structures are shown on the plans. —Q4.-LCUASS 3.3.4.A.7. Storm drainage flow direction arrows, particularly at intersections and all high and low points. Response: Addressed on plans. ,-2-1. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.9. Station and elevation of all horizontal curves including PI, PC's, PT's, etc.; high and low point and PI of all vertical curves; existing and proposed, centerline bearings, distances, and complete curve data. Response: Addressed on plans. ? LCUASS 3.3.4.A.10. Curb return radii, existing and proposed. Stations and elevations of all curb returns; chid -point elevations and additional locations necessary, flowline-flowline intersection elevations, and percent of grade from the PCR to flowline-flowline intersections of all crosspans. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Ted Shepard 04/17/02 Page 5 Response: Curb return information has been added to the plans. ?3 LCUASS 3.3.4.A.12. Centerline stations of all proposed driveways and all intersection roadways. Response: Addressed on plans. --?A. LCUASS 3.3.4.A.13. Survey tie lines to section comers or quarter corners. Response: Timberline Road should be tied to same location as the Timbers P.U.D. and 2003 Elementary School projects. 46- LCUASS 3.3.4.A.15. Intersections. Any roadway intersections shall include construction and lane details for the new construction and existing facilities for a minimum of 150' beyond the limits of construction. Response: Addressed on plans. LCUASS 3.3.4.13.1. Label existing and proposed grades. Response: Addressed on plans. ? CUASS 3.3.6. See this section for striping plan requirements. All permanent and temporary traffic signing and pavement markings shall be shown on the signing and striping plan, with the existing and proposed street system used as the base layout. Locations of signs and pavement markings shall be indicated by station/offset, or other specific dimensions indicating exact locations. This sheet shall also contain any construction or application notes. Provide an area map, section A. See 3.3.6.B,C,D for additional requirements. Response: All signing and striping is shown per LCUASS 3.3.6. -Taper Length formula L=WS or 540=12'x45mph (the posted speed limit). Response: The taper length has been changed to 540 feet. -29.Underground existing overhead utilities. Response: All existing utilities are shown on the plans. -36.-Striping Plan: Show how the proposed striping will tie into the existing striping on Timberline Road south of Timber Trail Road. NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC.