Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAUTUMN CREEK CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT SECOND - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2008-02-13City of Fort Collins Current Planning COUNTY REFERRAL COMMENT SHEET COMMENTS TO: Sarah Flick FROM:Engineering TYPE OF MEETING: Sketch Plan Review PROJECT: Autumn Creek CD THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Cameron Gloss City comments must be received in Current Planning Department by: September 8, 2000 ❑ No Problems B'- Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) .0 c�w� S - W N dev�lo� �� wltl v�sc'1ko teApV��� '(, a2 Ckc"1�c1(;�.1lj'' -4t �-c_. JS� •inelC.:E-t.�..;,5)• �..tu� E3�,{.�.y'�r 1r�...�Rcv�uns-, s ��n-uicc+ 4c, C1�.Ci1-ivC.k=L• Q *ks 4vc C. Iwi-IJC >. c- �rv..�2�DP�'l�w-��G7 CAA iYlci�Cc..'-� 4LCx-<_d '{-D iYK.�l�.i'lC p p �O L ici i/i l,Civ� �SLQ,Yc'Ct f�-�Y�Gl«Lly Cl"-S"�c. VIS.i�L�S �-c, �e� ( c nb)r�s v� 5' c I/� 2c��5f c• e�v<� wcvl -10 lx>- ?u 0;14C-cl mc- -l.-I C `jlcv: r_1c'�C'w �_a�c�` t"d�yi Cis.:-1c--eacec� ��o..:� C-oc�ifrzC'� c�zJxL Csr;-O CCZ�Z. �a , Sec lion. k�I4'� rn©vt,�� •i t`T�rsec�h� wC � v anc -la--be �PpceJ \-SZC) va» t (rlflC a.%;� <' 'G�1 Ce:t�ln�wau-liQ4 C�.`k3 ✓�G�Ivs.r1'� l.�ci_Lru��" �-�it.7 -�{"I�,� ..,,5C[�� I 3 �Ua c�l%O no-Y cllo:,�. n ccceiljcu� w�lt�`��z ZZ ra• ....�„���� � kc�z�ov��e. �r��� cov�r<�c�'�ra,-Is � (s;(�;' o.1Ovz�T,�iti, L-,c.u,y�dc�y -k� cod cS v •-fin c, k-y 9->,C,sK;ke c \!�L ���'NZYY�.+-��� 1 ✓'�.4:..Y.�LL'Cl<w_ .J..Y'� �l�h'� q� p ``Date: `C,�i4',��c S1gnature:;2':) t/c..�Licr,/ City ofFodCollins Re: Comments on proposed interim improvements to Carpenter Road for the Autumn Cret4L 444ge-Development From: City of Fort Collins Engineering, Katie Moore kdl\ July 30, 2004 1. The interim improvements made for Big Horn Ridge are not as shown. They widened the pavement to both the north and south and installed left turn lanes centered on the section line, and added 8' bike lanes on each side. They did not install a right turn lane in the interim, but have one in the plans for the ultimate. If you do not have a copy of these plans, copies are available at Technical Services. 2. While the right turn lane onto Eagle Prairie is not required, the City certainly does not oppose its construction. Additional ROW would be required if it is put in, though (12'). 3. I've taken a look at the proposed changes with Ward Stanford, from the City's Traffic Engineering section, and he thought it looked ok. I'll route him again when we get more detailed plans. 4. Please install a sidewalk along the frontage of the Autumn Creek property, as well as bike lanes on Carpenter (8'). tmailca 1 so.0q COUNTY REFERRAL REC.o City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning COMMENTS TO: Geniphyr Ponce -Pore FROM: Engineering TYPE OF MEETING: Conservation Development Review PROJECT: Autumn CreeKConservation Development THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department 7 PLANNER: Cameron Gloss City comments must be received in the Current Planning Department by: January 28, 2005 0 No Problems ® Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 'Row ottctl'ca-him 'nuo Lod. Cav�.d�r = Ar+ o� MSP, 1 yr ',ev vv, -r a. 5 fim 1 �o shoes ° T,rn assvrn,n°�. �, SiS rrbva.Q6'Pha4,� 6nly. 2) prny ,�w�II -r►'197-r rvn�orn� +t nR� Also , W I I re %. rd� nl*A-For RMfCIT I mry mf3. CaAf 1--5 P o Label It-kl. Pt wIAs CIA llpka4c I , f-6 d_a m f�. ro)nn= rive64rvu&r. Dom' Signature: City of Fort Collins Re: Comments on Autumn Creek Conservation Development, Phase From: City of Fort Collins Engineering, Katie Moore �,nn 1.26.2005 1. Carpenter Road is now classified as a 6-lane arterial on the master street plan, and is anticipated to become a state highway. The ROW required for a 6-lane arterial per LCUASS is 141 feet, with 70.5' from the centerline being the responsibility of this development to dedicate. 2. I'm assuming that the documents I received are for the approval of Phase 1 of this development only. Any further development (ie Phase 2) will trigger interim improvements to Carpenter to be determined at that time (most likely a left turn lane and bike lanes). Also, payment for the development's frontage improvements to Carpenter, and sidewalk improvements along Carpenter, will be due upon further development. Please see my comments from July 30, 2004 (attached). 3. It would be helpful to label the utility plans as Phase 1 only to clarify that Phase 2 will be addressed separately at a later date. �1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT :a Post Office Box 1190 cFort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970)498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMO TO: Geniphyr Ponce -Pore, Larimer County Planning Department FROM: Traci Downs, Development Services Engineer DATE: February 25, 2005 SUBJECT: Autumn Creek CD- Final Comments on Phase 1 Proiect Description/Background: This is Conservation Development proposal for a 31-acre residential development that will consist of 11 residential lots. The site is located on the south side of County Road 32, approximately one-half mile west of the CR 32 and Lemay Avenue intersection. The Fort Collins Growth Management Area is along the northern property line. The most recent proposal is to phase the construction and the final design into two phases. Phase 1 will consist of platting one residential lot, which will only necessitate improvements associated with providing adequate access and utilities to the one lot. Phase two will include the final platting and final design of the remainder of the property, which will necessitate significant road, drainage, and utility improvements. Comments: 1. The final plans and the final drainage report for the entire site and adjacent road improvements that address engineering comments, dated June 28, 2004, have not been submitted for review and are not yet approved. Therefore, the development agreement needs to clearly state that as part of platting phase 2, the final plans and drainage report need to be completed, reviewed, and approved. The phase 2 plans will need to be consistent with the preliminary approved plans or the project will need to go to public hearing again. It should also be noted that per Section 2.2 of the LCRM, construction plans, pavement design reports, drainage reports, and other documents are approved initially for 3 years. If not constructed during this time period, they automatically become void and must be updated to meet current standards before any future permits can be issued. 2. The phase one plans include an access road that will serve the existing lot and the proposed lot. An access that serves two lots needs to be 20 feet wide since this is the minimum width for two-way traffic. A cross-section for the shared access needs to be on the plans. If the access will not be within the platted Eagle Prairie Drive or Autumn Creek Court, an access easement is required in the interim. The existing access easement is not wide enough to accommodate the 20 foot required access and any necessary roadside drainage swales. The access easement also needs to be designated for emergency services. It should be noted on the plans, plat, and development agreement that this easement and access road will need to be vacated as part of the design and development of Phase 2. 3. An access detail is needed on the phase one plans. The proposed access for phase one needs to be paved to the right-of-way line with 20 foot minimum radii. The minimum depth of asphalt is 4 inches. The proposed pavement section needs to be on the plans. It appears that a culvert with flared end sections is required to convey roadside drainage. The culvert needs to be sized based on the calculated flows at this location. 4. The applicant has proposed to name the Phase one access road Autumn Creek Court since the homes will ultimately be addressed off Autumn Creek Court once Phase two is completed. It should be confirmed with the Building Department that this is acceptable since the plat will show the right-of-way off of Carpenter as Eagle Prairie Drive and the sign will be changed to Eagle Prairie Drive at the time of full build out. 5. Phase 1 will require a standard street and stop sign at the intersection of the access road and Carpenter Road. The detail for the sign and its location needs to be on the Phase 1 plans. Otherwise it is my understanding that all other signage and identity features will be designed with the Phase 2 plans. Sight distance and setbacks requirements from the LCUASS and LCRM need to be considered with the design and location of any proposed signs or identity structures. 6. The length of the dead end road can not exceed 660 feet without a second point of access per Section 8.14.2.G of the LCLUC. This proposal will have an access longer that 660 feet and will not have a second point of access, which was supported by the BCC at the preliminary hearing as noted in the finding and resolutions. The City of Loveland Fire Prevention Bureau also supported the single access at this time with the condition that lots would be fire sprinkled. The requirement for fire sprinklers needs to be stated in the phase 1 and phase 2 development agreements. In addition, the requirement needs to be noted on all plats associated with the development. The 50 foot wide emergency access easement to the east needs to be maintained on the phase 1 and phase 2 plats for the opportunity to have improved emergency service and pedestrian access in the future. 7. An emergency vehicle turnaround bulb is still needed at the end of the shared portion of the access road. 8. A cost estimate is required for Phase 1. 9. In the Autumn Creek Project Description and Review Criteria submitted by Cityscape, there is a list of landowners responsibilities required with subsequent phases. This list needs to be part of the development agreement for Phase 1. The list needs to be expanded to include the requirement for a second development agreement and cost estimate for Phase 2 and the requirement to abandon the temporary shared access easement and road. The development agreement language should also clearly outline the developer's responsibilities for the cost associated with the design and construction of the interim and ultimate improvements of Carpenter Road. The agreement should state that this section of road is currently a City of Fort Collins roadway and could potentially be governed by CDOT in the future. Applicable standards and permits will apply. 10. A 30 foot wide trail easement on the east side of the property is shown on the construction plans but is not shown on the plat. This needs to be clarified. 11. The conditions associated with the temporary septic system should be documented in the development agreement. Fees and Permits: • The Phase 1 improvements will necessitate a County Development Construction Permit. The applicant will be responsible for the associated fees and regulations associated with the permit. • Transportation Capital Expansion Fees will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. • This proposal lies in the Fossil Creek Basin and drainage fees will need to be calculated by Lisa Dunn, from this office. The list of fees will be forwarded to the Building Department and collected at the time of building permit application for each lot in the subdivision. • A City of Fort Collins access permit will also be required for the improvements to the existing access. There may be additional City of Fort Collins fees associated with the work within the Carpenter Road right-of-way. Staff Recommendation: Revised Phase I plans and plat that address the comments above need to be submitted. A cost estimate and Development Agreement need to be submitted for Phase 1. The Development Agreement needs to be submitted for review and it needs to include the detailed information relating to the outstanding issues that will be the responsibility of the Phase 2 developer. Please feel free to contact me directly if you would like to discuss these comments. I can be reached at (970) 498- 5701. Thank you. c: Cityscape Inc, 3555 Stanford Road -Suite 105, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Northern Engineering (Attu Bud Curtis) 420 South Howes — Suite 202, Fort Collins CO 80521 City of Fort Collins Engineering (Attu Sheri Wamhoff) File h:\devrev\planchk\projects\cd's\autumn creek cd\autumn creek cd final 3.doc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMO TO: Geniphyr Ponce -Pore, Larimer County Planning Department FROM: Traci Downs, Development Services Engineer IV DATE: April 5, 2005 SUBJECT: Autumn Creek CD- 2"" Set of Final Comments for Phased Plan Proiect Descrintion/Backeround This is Conservation Development proposal for a 31-acre residential development that will consist of 1 1 residential lots in two phases. The current review is only for Phase 1, which consists of platting one residential lot that will necessitate improvements associated with providing adequate access and utilities to the one lot. Phase two will include the final platting and final design of the remainder of the property, which will necessitate significant road, drainage, and utility improvements. The site is located on the south side of County Road 32, approximately one- half mile west of the County Road 32 and Lemay Avenue intersection. County Road 32-adjacent to the site has been annexed by the City and is called Carpenter Road. The Fort Collins Growth Management Area is along the northern property line. Comments, 1. The cost estimate should clearly state that it is only for Phase 1 improvements. The Erosion Control Section needs to include a line item for reseeding, mulching and crimping of the disturbed areas. There should ct a cost under the asphalt line item since a paved apron will be required. Although there are minimal improvements associated with Phase 1, the County will still require a Professional Engineered, signed and stamped certification letter and record drawing prior to releasing the collateral. Also, sufficient testing is needed to verify that the access road is adequate for emergency vehicles. Therefore, there should be a cost under material testing and record drawings. It should be clarified if traffic control will be necessary for the access improvements. 2. An access maintenance agreement between the two properties needs to be recorded with the final plat of Phase 1. 3. The development agreement for phase 1 needs to have a section that clearly discusses the outstanding requirements needed to process Phase 2. For example, the final plans and the final drainage report for the entire site and adjacent road improvements have not approved. The phase 2 plat, plans, and reports will need to be submitted for review and approval and they will need to be consistent with the preliminary approved plans or the project will need to go to public hearing again. The list of Phase 2 landowner responsibilities stated in the previous memo prepared by Cityscape needs to be part of this section as well. The list needs to be expanded to include the requirement fora second development agreement and cost estimate for Phase 2. It should also be noted that the temporary shared access easement and access road will need to be abandoned. The Phase 2 landowner responsibilities will also include the cost associated with the design and construction of the interim and ultimate improvements of Carpenter Road, which is currently a City of Fort Collins roadway and could potentially be governed by CDOT in the future. Phase 2 will be subject to applicable standards and permits that are in effect at the time of final review of Phase 2. It needs to be clear that building permits will not be issued within Block 2 or 3 until the above items are satisfied. 4. The landscape exhibit says that the construction costs for Carpenter Road will remain at a fixed rate for three years from the recoding date of the Phase One Development Agreement. However, the improvement plans were never finalized and therefore, the final cost estimate was also not finalized or approved. This will need to be finalized as part of the Phase 2 improvements. 5. The cross-section for the shared access needs to specify the minimum depth and type of all weather road surface. It 6. If the existing culvert will remain, it needs to be confirmed that the culvert is in good condition, has flared end sections, and it is long enough to safely widen the shared access to 20 feet and still have 4:1 side slopes. If the existing culvert is considered acceptable, the plans need to state that the existing culvert is to remain. 7. It should be noted on the plat the 18 foot wide access easement will also be vacated as part of the Phase 2 Plans and Plat. Fees and Permits: • The Phase 1 improvements will necessitate a County Development Construction Permit. The applicant will be responsible for the associated fees and regulations associated with the permit. • Transportation Capital Expansion Fees will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. • This proposal lies in the Fossil Creek Basin and drainage fees will need to be calculated by Lisa Dunn, from this office. The list of fees will be forwarded to the Building Department and collected at the time of building permit application for each lot in the subdivision. • A City of Fort Collins access permit will also be required for the improvements to the existing access. There may be additional City of Fort Collins fees associated with the work within the Carpenter Road right-of-way. Staff Recommendation: The comments above relating to the plans, cost estimate and development agreement need to be addressed prior to final approval of phase 1. Please feel free to contact me directly if you would like to discuss these comments. I can be reached at (970) 498-5701. Thank you. c: Cityscape Inc, 3555 Stanford Road -Suite 105, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Northern Engineering (Attn Bud Curtis) 420 South Howes — Suite 202, Fort Collins CO 80521 City of Fort Collins Engineering (Attu Sheri Wamhoff) File h:\devrev\planchk\projects\cd's\autumn creek cd\autumn creek cd final 4 _phased plan.doc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 h! V 1 ( 2006 (970) 498.5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMO TO: Rob Helmick, Latimer County Planning Department FROM: Traci Downs, Development Services Engineer 'D DATE: November 15, 2006 SUBJECT: Autumn Creek CD- Final Plat Review of Phase 2 Proiect Description/Background This is a Conservation Development proposal for a 31-acre residential development that will consist of 11 residential lots. The site is located on the south side of County Road 32, approximately one-half mile west of the CR 32 and Lemay Avenue intersection. The Fort Collins Growth Management Area is along the northern property line. The access for the development will be off of County Road 32, which the City of Fort Collins has previously annexed as a 4-Lane Arterial. The historic drainage patterns are from the southwest to the northeast and into the CR 32 roadside ditch. From there the flows are conveyed east site to the railroad tracks and ultimately into Fossil Creek. The site lies within the Fossil Creek Drainage Basin. Review Criteria: Our department has reviewed the final plans and reports to verify that the drainage and transportation aspects for the proposal are adequate. The criteria found in the Larimer County Land Use Code, Road Manual, Access Code, Urban Area Street Standards, and Storm -Water Management Manual were used in reviewing this submittal. The comments below are also noted on the red lined plans that I have returned to the design engineer. Comments: 1. The dedication statement on the Final Plat appears to dedicate the roads within the subdivision as public roads; however, it was my understanding that these roads were going to be private. 2. The construction set I was sent for review had a Saddle Ridge Annexation sheet. 3. The plat has different street names than the construction plan set. 4. If the internal road system will be a private and emergency access easement rather than a publicly dedicated right-of-way, the note from Section 3.13 of the LCRM, which discuss maintenance of private road improvements, will need to be on the cover sheet of the plan set. 5. Since Carpenter Road has been annexed into the City of Fort Collins and road improvements are required, any sheets with Carpenter Road Improvements will need to be reviewed by the City of Fort Collins. The Cities signature blocks will needed to be included. 6. Per section 1.9.3 of the Latimer County Urban Area Street Standards, adjacent road improvements are required to improve Carpenter Road adjacent to the site to the ultimate cross-section. The design was not included with the submitted plan set but the final design must incorporate previous comments by City and recommendations found in the traffic impact study. It was previously agreed that a fee in lieu of the ultimate improvement would be acceptable in this case; however, the agreements will need to be finalized and approved by the County and the City prior to the Final Plat approval of this project. 7. More information is needed on the interim Carpenter Road improvements. The interim road needs to include the left turn lane, bike lane and sidewalk. The bike lane and sidewalk need to tie in to the Big Horn Ridge bike lane and sidewalk. The plans need to show the pavement section and sign/stripe plan for these improvements. A typical cross-section and design cross -sections are also required. 8. The drive locations and details for the existing house and the new Lot 1,Block 1 should be on the plans. Paved aprons should be shown to minimize tracking gravel into the bulb. 9. A detail with spot elevations is needed for the median in the cul-de-sac bulb. 10. The lane and median widths at the two medians in Golden Prairie Court should be shown on the plans. It. Staff is asking for clarification on which curb, gutter, sidewalk details shown on Sheet 18 are required for this site. 12. Has the private gate near the median been omitted? 13. Curb chases are referenced in the detail sheets; however, where are these chases called out in the plan views? 14. It does not appear that the concrete run downs near the culverts under Golden Prairie Court or the one on Raptors Roost are detailed anywhere on the plans. 15. Intersection details, with all applicable spot elevations, for each intersection needs to be shown on the plans. 16. The Stop signs have been called out but I did not see the Street Sign locations or details specified. 17. The drainage report needs to explain how the Carpenter Road swale will be affected by the ultimate improvements. How will the drainage work once the road is fully built out? 18. The cost estimate will need to be on the County's standard cost estimate spreadsheet. 19. The drainage report will need to include swale sizing calculations for the swales shown on Sheet 12. The Swale sections on the plans shall show the minimum depth and side slopes that are required. Spot elevations along the flow line should be added to one of the sheets so that the swale flowline is constructed with the proper minimum slope stated on Sheet 12. 20. Street capacity calculations are requested in the drainage report. In the 100 year rain event, where are the limits and path of flow? The drainage report states that there will be overtopping in the 100 year rain event. Will this overtopping create any adverse impacts to downstream property or lots? What will the street overtopping depth be? 21. The drainage report will need to include a discussion on the downstream path of flow from the site to the next major conveyance or body of water. Statements that verify that the downstream properties will not be impacted shall also be included. 22. The drainage report needs to explain how the Carpenter Road Swale will be affected by the ultimate improvements. How will the drainage work once the road is fully built out? 23. More detailed discussion in the drainage narrative is requested regarding the upstream off -site flows that will pass through the site. For example, how much area will contribute to the site, what are the flow rates in the 2 -year and 10-year rain events, how will the flows be "passed" though the site, etc. 24. An erosion installation sequence schedule should be added to the plan set and erosion control report. 25. The erosion control report needs to include performance standard calculations as discussed on pages 66 and 67 of the County's addendum to the UDCM. We ask that all items listed under section 1.3.e on page 68 of this manual are also included in the erosion control plan. 26. With the next submittal, I would also like an opportunity to review the Development Agreement. Fees and Permits: • Per Section 9.5 and 9.6 of the LCLUC, Engineering Staff would like to notify the applicant that Transportation Capital Expansion Fees will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. • The County has adopted a Development Construction Permit (DCP) and this application will be subject to the DCP fees and associated conditions (Section 12.5 of the LCLUC). The DCP Fee will be required at the time of DCP issuance in accordance with duly enacted DCP fee regulations then in effect. According to current regulations, Staff estimates the Development Construction Permit fee for this development to be $1,500 (at $150 per lot x 10 lots). Upon recordation of the final plat, the applicant will need to contact the Larimer County Engineering Department for additional requirements associated with this permit. This proposal lies in the Fossil Creek Basin and drainage fees will need to be calculated by this office and the fees will be forwarded to the Building Department and collected at the time of building permit application for each lot in the subdivision. City of Fort Collins right-of-way Permits will apply for any work within the Carpenter Road right-of- way. Staff Recommendation: The comments above need to be addressed prior to final plat approval. In addition to any necessary modifications to the plan set or drainage/erosion control report, Staff also asks that a written response is provided for each comment above. Please feel free to contact me directly if you would like to discuss these comments. I can be reached at 970.498.5701. Thank you. c: Cityscape Inc, 3555 Stanford Road -Suite 105, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Northern Engineering, 200 South College Avenue, Suite 100 80524 City of Fort Collins Engineering File H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK%Nojects\CD's\Autumn Creek CD\Autumn Creek CD Final Phase 2 _ Dated Nov 2006.doc I Q C O U N TY REFERRAL COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning COMMENTS TO: Sarah Flick FROM: ENGINEERING TYPE OF MEETING: Larimer County Planning Commission PROJECT: Autumn Creek CD THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Brian Grubb City comments must be received in Current Planning Department by: June 13, 2001 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: _� Please provide an additional 27.5' Right of Way on County Road 32 from the section line • County Road 32' must be designed 1000' both East and West of the property line • Private Streets and drives are to be built in accordance with the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards J,— A second point of access must be connected through Big Horn Development to County Road 32 as part of the Autumn Creek Development lThe drive to the existing house shall come off of the end of the cul-de-sa: y The street off of County Road 32 is a residential local and should have 45' Right of Way containing 24' roadway, 6' parkway, and 4.5' sidewalks • County Road 32 must be constructed along property line as part of this development. You may wish to coordinate with Big Horn to the east on this design. Please contact Matt Baker if you have further questions. • The drive access on the north should be eliminated. • A pedestrian connection is preferred between Autumn Creek site and the southern development if possible. • The lot on the far east may require sprinklers as per Poudre Fire Authority Standards. The drive from the end of the cul-de-sac to the existing building must be 20' wide and capable of handling Poudre Fire Authority Emergency Vehicles. Date: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 APR 12 2007 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMO TO: Rob Helmick, Latimer County Planning Department FROM: Traci Downs, Development Services Engineer iV'D DATE: April 10, 2007 SUBJECT: Autumn Creek CD- Phase 2 Final Comments Project Description/Background: This is Conservation Development proposal for a 31-acre residential development that will consist of I I residential lots. The site is located on the south side of County Road 32, approximately one-half mile west of the CR 32 and Lemay Avenue intersection. The Fort Collins Growth Management Area is along the northern property line. The most recent proposal is to phase the construction and the final design into two phases. Phase I will consist of platting one residential lot, which will only necessitate improvements associated with providing adequate access and utilities to the one lot. Phase two will include the final platting and final design of the remainder of the property, which will necessitate significant road, drainage, and utility improvements. Comments: 1. Why is Outlot A not included in the table on sheet I of the plat? 2. Is the 50 foot emergency access easement shown on sheet 2 of the plat still needed? 3. We ask that the minimum required construction depth of the swales is stated on the plat in addition to the flow depth. 4. Sheet 16 still reference the island detail in the title. 5. We would like the cost estimate to include costs under the categories survey, material testing, record drawings, and construction management. Also, we would like the cost for seeding and erosion control to be added to erosion control. 6. Although the developer was not required to construct the ultimate half street improvements with the: development, they were required to construct the interim improvements which included the left turn lane, bike lane and sidewalk. These improvements were also required of the adjacent church property. The interim improvements need to need to be consistent with these road improvements to the east and shall also smoothly transition into the existing cross-section to the west. The pavement section and sign/strip plan for the interim improvements will be needed on the plans. Cross -sections are also required. The City block will need to be an the Carpenter Road improvement Plans, which includes some of the utility sheets. A separate cost estimate for the interim road improvements to Carpenter will be required. The attached language from the development agreement discusses the requirements and timing for the interim improvements. 7. A separate cost estimate for the adjacent ultimate road improvements for Carpenter Road needs to be submitted with the next submittal. The agreed upon amount will be included in the development agreement along with the attached language that explains the terms of the fee in lieu of ultimate improvements. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Projects\CD's\Autumn Creek CD\Autumn Creek CD Phase 2 Final Plan.doc 8. We ask that street sign details are added to the plan set. The county has street sign details shown in Drawing 8, 9, and 10 of the Larimer County Rural Area Road Standards, which are linked to the County Engineering website. Drawing 1401 and 1411 in the LCUASS also has signage details. 9. As I recall, Phase I included a shared access easement for the 2 lots and for emergency services. If this is the case, this easement and access road will need to be vacated as part of the design and development of Phase 2. Fees and Permits: • The Phase 2 improvements will necessitate a County Development Construction Permit. The applicant will be responsible for the associated fees and regulations associated with the permit. • A City of Fort Collins access permit will also be required for the improvements to the existing access. There may be additional City of Fort Collins fees associated with the work within the Carpenter Road right-of-way. • Transportation Capital Expansion Fees will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. • This proposal lies in the Fossil Creek Basin and drainage fees will be forwarded to the Building Department and collected at the time of building permit application for each lot in the subdivision. Staff Recommendation: The comments above should be addressed prior to recording the final plat. Please feel free to contact me directly if you would like to discuss these comments. I can be reached at (970) 498-5701. Thank you. c: Cityscape Inc, 3555 Stanford Road -Suite 105, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Northern Engineering (Attu Bud Curtis) 420 South Howes — Suite 202, Fort Collins CO 80521 City of Fort Collins Engineering (Attu Sheri Langenberger) File rn t Pk` ps 10. Sewage. Developer shall obtain sewer service from the South Fort Collins Sanitation District. All sewer lines required for the Property shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the South Fort Collins Sanitation District and as reflected on approved utility plans. The sewer mains and supply service lines shall be subject to inspection by the South Fort Collins Sanitation District during construction. Developer shall submit a letter of acceptance from the South Fort Collins Sanitation District for maintenance and responsibility of all sewer improvements prior to the Completion Date as stated in Section 8. 11. Trenches. Trenches for sanitary sewer and water, storm sewer lines, and utilities shall be compacted in accordance with specifications defined by County or the water, sewer, and utility service provider. Developer will test trench compaction while work is in progress. A sufficient number of tests shall be made to insure adequate compaction. The test results shall be certified by the soils laboratory and maintained on file at the site by Developer for review by County personnel. In the event adequate compaction testing is not provided, County may order such testing and Developer shall reimburse County for all such costs of testing. No release of the final construction collateral or release of completed improvements shall be made until successful compaction tests are received. Compaction tests must be received and approved by the Engineering Department before the Completion Date. 12. Roads. Developer obtained a temporary Development Construction Permit from the County on April 8, 2003 and obtained all access or utility permits required prior to the start of construction of the road improvements. Upon recordation of the final subdivision plat for this Development and submission of the construction collateral in accordance with Paragraph 22, the temporary Development Construction Permit shall be converted to a full Development Construction Permit. A. On -site Road Improvements. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy forth to be constructed on Lot 2, Developer shall construct all on -site road improvements and install all traffic safety devices as shown on the final plat and in the supporting documents for the Development in accordance with the plans and specifications, as prepared by Developer's licensed engineers and professionals, and approved by the County Engineer. All street layout and geometric design shall be in accordance with applicable County standards and as portrayed on the approved constructions drawings. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision plat for this Development, Developer shall furnish construction collateral to the County in accordance with Paragraph 22 to guarantee that sufficient funds are available for completion of the on -site road improvements listed on Exhibit A. LCPP-127 4/1/04 Page 4 Completion of the on -site road improvements shall not be required prior to the issuance of building permits if the Developer provides adequate fire protection and an all weather accessway to the Development during all phases of construction as approved by the Loveland Fire Protection Bureau. Developer shall submit the following items to the County to request the final release of completed on -site road improvements by the County: (1) A signed and stamped statement must be submitted from a professional civil engineer registered in Colorado that the road improvements have been completed in substantial compliance with approved plans and the Latimer County Urban Area Street Standards, and that the documenting engineer or his representative have made regular outside on -site inspections during the course of construction and the field plans used are the same as those approved by the County. Copies of all on -site inspection reports performed by the documenting engineer or his representative must be submitted as well. (2) Test results must be submitted for all phases of the development as per the Latimer County Urban Area Street Standards for minimum materials sampling, testing and inspection and as required by the County Engineer. (3) One (1) copy of the "as built" on -site road improvement plans must be submitted at the time Developer requests a release of collateral. All deviations from approved plans must be listed and shown on the "as built" plans. No release of the final construction collateral for the on -site road improvements shall be made until the above listed items have been submitted. All items listed above must be received and approved by the Engineering Department before the Completion Date. B. Interim Carpenter Road Improvements. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for- is trto be constructed on Lot 2, Developer shall construct interim improvements to Carpenter Road adjacent to this Development in accordance with Sheet 26 of the approved utility plans entitled "Interim Carpenter Road Plan and Profile", as prepared by the Developer's licensed engineers and professionals, and approved by the City and County Engineers (the "Interim Carpenter Road Improvements"). All construction shall be in accordance with the approved construction drawings and the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards ("LCUASS"). In the event of a conflict between the approved construction drawings and LCUASS, the approved construction drawings shall govern. Prior to commencement of construction of the Interim Carpenter Improvements, Developer deposited with the City a letter of credit, in a form and amount acceptable to the City, to guarantee completion of the construction and the LCPP-127 4/1/04 Page 5 Of maintenance and repair of the Interim Carpenter Road Improvements in accordance with Section 3.3.2(1) through (3) of the City Land Use Code. Completion of the Interim Carpenter Road Improvements shall not be required prior to the issuance of building permits if the Developer provides adequate fire protection and an all weather accessway to the Development during all phases of construction as approved by the Loveland Fire Protection Bureau. C. Ultimate Carpenter Road Improvements. In view of the City's desire to improve Carpenter Road as a capital project, which capital project is anticipated to include that portion of Carpenter Road adjacent to this Development-and--EaF3 I�dgeubdisri�l©i�, Developer shall take the following actions in compliance with the conditions of the Subdivision Approval and in lieu of any Developer obligation to construct the Ultimate Carpenter Road Improvements: (1) Prior to recordation of the final subdivision plat for this Development, the Developer shall provide evidence to the County of its payment to the City of a sum equal to the estimated cost to construct one-half of the local street portion of Carpenter Road and the estimated cost to construct the storm water drain pipe along the south side of Carpenter Road adjacent to this Development and Lot 3 of the Big Horn Ridge Subdivision, which amounts shall be based upon approved cost estimates attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and shall be used only for construction of the Ultimate Carpenter Road Improvements as described below; and (2) Prior to the Completion Date (i) prepare a design for improvefiie is to enter Road adjacent to this Development and Lot 3 of --tide Big Horn N Ridg ubdivision to four lane arterial standards ingluding curbs, gutters, sidewalks the storm water drain pipe along. -the south side of Carpenter Road; (ii) prep reliminary design for-iriiprovements to Carpenter Road extending one and (1000) feet east and west of this Development and Lot 3 of ig Horn Ridge Subdivision to ensure appropriate transitions to the'exis ' improvements (the improvements described in (i) and (iij aliove to be her er referred to as the "Ultimate Carpenter Road Irppfnvements"); and (iii) o the City's signature of j approval on t}re inylars therefor, based upon the for the Ultimate Carpentey,R ad Improvements, which approval shall n be unreasonably withlyeld. The Ultimate Carpenter Road Improvements sha a designed ip-,6ccordance with the LCUASS. Developer's compliance with the requirements of Paragraphs 12.C.(1) and above shall fulfill all of the Developer's obligations in connection with the Ultimate Carpenter Road Improvements for this Development and for Lot 3 of the Big Horn Ridge Subdivision. LCPP-127 4/ 1 /04 Page 6 Selected Issues Report Cifyaf FortCollitts 2/8/2008 Date: AUTUMN CREEK 2ND FILING CD - COUNTY REFERRAL SELECTION CRITERIA: Status = All ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Transportation Number:1 Created:10/24/2006 Pending [10/24/06] David Averill (Transportation Planning): How are this project's obligations concerning the improvement of Carpenter Rd. being addressed? Escrow? CIA? Construction? Number:2 Created:10/24/2006 Pending [10/24/06] David Averill (Transportation Planning): What is the proposed classification/cross section of Golden Prairie Court? LCUASS reference? Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Langenberger Topic: General Number:5 Created:11/13/2006 Pending [11/13/06] It wasn't clear - when are improvements to Carpenter Road planned? When will this developments obligations be met? Number:6 Created:11/13/2006 Pending [11/13106] Permits for any work within the Carpenter Road ROW will need to be obtained from the City Page 1 City of Fort Collins Current Planning COUNTY REFERRAL COMMENT SHEET COPY COMMENTS TO: Rob Helmick FROM: ENGINEERING TYPE OF MEETING: County PROJECT: Autumn Creek CD THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Bob Barkeen City comments must be received in Current Department by: AUGUST 6, 2003 Planning Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1. Need to submit design and construct interim improvements to Carpenter Road, include signing and stripping plan. Coordinate construction with Big Horn if possible. 2. Need to submit preliminary (horizontal with enough vertical to show design works) design for ultimate design of Carpenter for 1000 feet west of site, Coordinate with engineer for Big Horn (TST). Date: Dave ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970)498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMO TO: Geniphyr Ponce -Pore, Larimer County Planning Department FROM: Traci Downs, Civil Engineer II ' Y DATE: August 15, 2003 SUBJECT: Autumn Creek CD- Final Comments (19-06-68) Project Descrintion/Backg ound This is a Conservation Development proposal for a 31-acre residential development that will consist of 11 residential lots. The site is located on the south side of County Road 32, approximately one-half mile west of the CR 32 and Lemay Avenue intersection. The Fort Collins Growth Management Area is along the northern property line. The access for the development will be off of County Road 32, which the City of Fort Collins has previously annexed as a 4-Lane Arterial. On the north side of CR 32 is Greenstone PUD, a City of Fort Collins subdivision. On the west side of the property is Patterson Pointe, a comparable development to the proposed development. Coeur D' Alene Estates lies just south of the property and the Big Horn Ridge Development is under construction to the east of the site. The historic drainage patterns are from the southwest to the northeast and into the CR 32 roadside ditch. From there the flows are conveyed east site to the railroad tracks and ultimately into Fossil Creek. The site lies within the Fossil Creek Drainage Basin. The Louden Ditch runs along the southern property line and there is a private irrigation pond on site. Review Criteria: Our department has reviewed the final plans and reports to verify that the drainage and transportation aspects for the proposal are adequate. The criteria found in the Larimer County Land Use Code, Road Manual, Access Code, and Storm -Water Management Manual were used in reviewing this submittal. Construction Plans, 1. A half right-of-way of 60 feet is shown on the plans and delineated on the Final Plat. This meets the requirements of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards and therefore no further action is required. 2. The internal road system has been dedicated as a private and emergency access easement rather than a publicly dedicated right-of-way, which is how the Board of County Commissioners approved the preliminary proposal. Therefore, notes similar to those stated in section 3.13 of the LCRM, which discusses maintenance of private road improvements, should be included on the plans. 3. Any pertinent notes from Section 3.8, 3.14.C, and 3.14.G of the LCRM should be included in the plans. Since Carpenter Road has been annexed into the City of Fort Collins and road improvements are required, notes pertaining to City requirements will also need to be in the plan set. A City right-of-way permit will likely be required. 4. Per section 1.9.3 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, adjacent road improvements are required to improve Carpenter Road adjacent to the site to the ultimate cross-section. The design was not included with the submitted plan set but the final design must incorporate previous comments by City and recommendations found in the traffic impact study. Typically, the design would need to extend 1000 feet in both directions from the property line to make sure the design will tie in to existing and proposed improvements. Since the adjacent parcel is under development and also is required to make road improvements, the ultimate design and construction should be coordinated between the developers and their engineers. It is my understanding that discussions are in progress regarding the agreements for the ultimate design of the roadway, for the funding, and for the construction responsibilities. The design and the agreements will need to be finalized and approved by the City and the County prior to the Final Plat approval of this project. The City block will also need to be on the Carpenter Road improvement Plans. 5. If an interim improvement for Carpenter Road is required as part of these plans, it will need to include an interim roadside drainage design, detailed paving section, spot elevations, striping, and signage plan. 6. The proposed design requires a variance from the minimum 100-foot tangent length at the Autumn Creek Court and Eagle Prairie Drive intersection. This permitted variance should be stated in the notes section of the front page of the plans. 2 7. It was agreed during the preliminary review of this plan that the cross-section of Autumn Creek Court would be permitted to meet the City of Fort Collins Narrow Residential Local Street Cross-section as shown on plate 7-1 OF of the LCUASS. Per this cross-section, sidewalks are required. In addition, this will provide a pedestrian link to the sidewalks adjacent to Eagle Prairie Drive, which then provide connectivity, to the east. 8. The Autumn Creek Court cross-section on the plans shows a 46-foot right-of-way, however it was approved as a private and emergency access easement and this is how the plat delineates it as well. 9. The Autumn Creek Court cross-section on the plans shows a 46-foot right-of-way (which should say private and emergency access easement), however, it appears that additional easement is necessary through the section where there is a pull out and medians. The additional easement is needed for the swale cross-section on the east side and for maintenance of the roadway and parkway without needing the utility easement. 10. The cross-section for Eagle Prairie Drive needs to match that of the proposed cross-section on the adjacent Big Hom Development to the east. It is my understanding that TST Inc. is working on these plans and this should be discussed, clarified and confirmed with them prior to final plat approval. The vertical alignment on the Autumn Creek plans will need to smoothly tie in to the design prepared by TST and any necessary vertical curves should be built in as part of this proposal. 11. Detailed vertical and horizontal information (plan and profile sheet) plus a typical cross-section should be provided for the private looped roads off of Autumn Creek Court. The curb return radii should be specified at all intersection locations. These roads need to offer adequate space for movement of two-way traffic need to be fully accessible by emergency vehicles. The minimum permitted centerline radius for these type of roads as stated in Table 7-3 of the LCUASS is 50 feet and one location does not meet this minimum standard. A pan or curb and gutter system should be included in the cross-section to convey flows off of the lots to the main curb and gutter of Autumn Creek Court. This will minimize saturated soils near the roadway, which can then lead to premature pavement failure. A detail for the required grading on the lots should be shown on the plans that specifies that all lots need to drain into the drainage system of the looped roads. 12, The pavement type, binder information, thickness, etc should be clearly shown on the road cross -sections that are included in the plans and the geotechnical report should be referenced on the plans for further information. 13. The requirements (Section 4.31 LCRM) for the landscaping within the sight distance triangles shown on the plat should be stated on the plans and included in the Homeowners documents and covenants so they are aware of these requirements in the future. 14. Engineering Staff discourages irrigated medians because there have been cases where the irrigation combined with poor drainage and median design has caused premature subgrade and pavement failure. We would much prefer that low maintenance landscaping be planted in the medians with trickle irrigation. However, Section 4.3.K of the LCRM does state that irrigated medians are an option if the median has infall curb and gutter with an inlet/stonndrain system and the pavement in the streets in full depth asphalt or portland cement concrete. The type of curb for the medians was not specified or detailed on the plans. If outfall curb is proposed, it needs to be confirmed that a 2% cross slope is still feasible. Any landscaping in the island must conform to sight distance requirements in Section 4.3.F LCRM and stated on the landscape plans, Homeowners documents, and covenants. 15. Section 4.3.K of the LCRM and Chapter 7.5 of the LCUASS specifies requirements for medians. AASHTO requirements should also be referenced with median design. Typically, the nose of the median should be set back 20 feet at intersections but as a minimum it should be confirmed that vehicles would not need to track onto the median to turn around. I do not think that the radii/curve data was provided on the plans for the median in the cul-de-sac bulb. The dimensions should follow the figure 7-21 of the LCUASS. 16. Due the dead end road that exceeds 660 feet, the plans include a second point of access to the east for emergency vehicles. An off -site easement from the adjacent property owner needs to be recorded at the same time that the proposed Autumn Creek Final Plat is recorded. The typical cross-section, vertical information, and horizontal information needs to be provided on the plans. 17. The applicant is proposing a gate on Autumn Creek Court and the proposed gate system needs final approval from the local fire authority. 18. Intersection details need to be on the plans that show on bow the two private driveways that serve the two lots at the southern extent of the property will tie into Autumn Creek Court. For example, what type of curb cut or transition will be provided if any. 19. The following details and construction specifications need to be provided in the plan set for the following items: sidewalks, ramps, street/stop signs, barricades (some type of barricade is usually also where sidewalks terminate as well), type R inlets, erosion control, curb/median/island, curb cuts, riprap, orifice plate/outlet structure for ponds, emergency overflow wier, etc 20. Cross -sections for all proposed swales need to be provided in the plan set. Typically the County requires drainage easements to be a minimum of 20 feet wide to accommodate slopes, grading to tie to existing grades and maintenance needs and it appears that the off -site 10 foot drainage easement should be also be approximately 20 feet wide. 21. Sheet 10 references sheet 7 for off -site outfall channel information but sheet 7 has pipe profiles. The outlet from the pond was not profiled on sheet 7. 22. Locations and types of all proposed and required signs need to be on the plans. Details of signs should also be provided. Drainage and Erosion Control Report 23. The last paragraph of the drainage report states that it is a preliminary report. This should be a final analysis and the final drainage report needs to be signed and stamped by a P.L. 24. The Erosion Control Discussion of the report is missing. 25. An offsite drainage easement is required for the proposed offsite detention pond and Swale. An off -site easement for these features from the adjacent property owner needs to be recorded at the same time that the proposed Autumn Creek Final Plat is recorded. Since a portion of the Big Hom Ridge development has been designed and the grading on the site has begun, it should be confirmed that the proposed Autumn Creek design adequately ties into their plans. 26. Calculations for sizing the overflow wier, orifice plate/outlet structure/riprap, etc should be in the appendix of the report. 27. The 100 year elevation of the pond should be calculated in the report and specified on the plans. 28. Any ponding and back water should be considered at the inlet of the culvert . Tailwater should be considered in the pond for all capacity calculations. 29. I would like clarification on how the off -site flows will be passed through the site while still detaining the appropriate on site developed flows. e s: 30. Engineering Staff would like to notify the applicant that Transportation Capital Expansion Fees will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. 31. This proposal lies in the Fossil Creek Basin and drainage fees will need to be calculated by Lisa Dunn, from this office. The list of fees will be forwarded to the Building Department and collected at the time of building permit application for each lot in the subdivision. Staff Recommendation: The comments above need to be addressed prior to final plat approval. I would also like an opportunity to review the Development Agreement prior to final approval. Please feel free to contact me directly at 970.498.5701. Thank you. c: Cityscape Inc, (Attu Kim Straw) 3555 Stanford Road -Suite 105, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Northern Engineering (Attu Bud Curtis) 420 South Howes — Suite 202, Fort Collins CO 80521 City of Fort Collins Engineering (Attu Dave Stringer) File h:\deNTev�planchk\projects\ed's\autumn creek ed\autumn creek cd final Ldoc City of Fort Collins Current Planning COUNTY REFERRAL COMMENT SHEET COMMENTS TO: Geniphyr Ponce -Pore FROM: Engineering TYPE OF MEETING: LarCo Planning Dept. — Meeting TBA PROJECT: Autumn Creek Conservation Development THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Bob Barkeen City comments must be received in the Current Planning Department by: June 9, 2004 ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) iL�%rnc�th c� (, Vw_, � ��c A=t',�� ca Date: 0submi City of Fort Collins 7EXCELLENCE COM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMO TO: Geniphyr Ponce -Pore, Larimer County Planning Department FROM: Traci Downs, Civil Engineer B DATE: June 28, 2004 SUBJECT: Autumn Creek CD- 2"d Set Final Comments (19-06-68) Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 Project Description/Background This is a Conservation Development proposal for a 31-acre residential development that will consist of 11 residential lots. The site is located on the south side of County Road 32, approximately one-half mile west of the CR 32 and Lemay Avenue intersection. The Fort Collins Growth Management Area is along the northern property line. The access for the development will be off of Comity Road 32, which the City of Fort Collins has previously annexed as a 4-Lane Arterial. The historic drainage patterns are from the southwest to the northeast and into the CR 32 roadside ditch. From there the flows are conveyed east site to the railroad tracks and ultimately into Fossil Creek. The site lies within the Fossil Creek Drainage Basin. Review Criteria: Our department has reviewed the final plans and reports to verify that the drainage and transportation aspects for the proposal are adequate. The criteria found in the Larimer County Land Use Code, Road Manual, Access Code, Urban Area Street Standards, and Storm -Water Management Manual were used in reviewing this submittal. The comments below are also noted on the red lined plans that I have returned to the design engineer. Comments: 1. The revised plans need to be signed and stamped by a Professional Engineer. 2. Applicable sheets relating to Carpenter Road need to be sent to Sherrie Wamhoff at the City for review. 3. I have made a few miscellaneous comments on the general note sheet. 4. The note sheet of the plat needs to include information and requirements for the sight distance easements. It should also be confirmed that the plat clearly delineates which roads are private and public. 5. The City block will need to be on the Carpenter Road improvement Plans, which includes some of the utility sheets. 6. The plans need to specify the minimum lane and median widths through the varied section of Autumn Creek Drive. 7. Provide support and gate detail and/or gate specifications on the plans. Provide letter of approval from fire authority. 8. We would like the design engineer to double check that the cross slopes from centerline to edge of curb are near 2% and that there is minimum cross slope on the bulb. 9. The radius on the bulb needs to be 50 feet per figure 7-19 of the LCUASS. 10. The access road to the two far south lots should be 20 feet wide since this is the minimum width for two-way traffic. There should also be a paved apron to minimize tracking gravel into the bulb. 11. A sign plan for the subdivision is required. 12. A sidewalk ramp on the east side is needed at the "T" intersection. 13. It needs to be clarified if the lots can address off of Autumn Creek Drive or if the loop roads need to be named. 14. The interim road needs to include the left turn lane, bike lane and sidewalk. The bike Lane and sidewalk need to tie in to the Big Horn Ridge bike lane and sidewalk. The pavement section and sign/step plan for the interim improvements are needed on the plans. Cross -sections are also required. 15. Prior to final approval, the timing and cost agreements for the design and construction of the ultimate section of Carpenter Road need to be clarified. The design should be approved as part of this approval and the cost should be finalized, including an agreement with the city. 16. It should be clarified that the proposed identity signs on the landscape plan meet County building requirements. 17. Water tight joints should be used on pipe systems where the hydraulic grade line is above the top of pipe. 18. The pond should have a maximum slope of 4:1. 19. The grading for the pond ties in right at the property line. To assure that the adjacent parcel is not disturbed or adversely impacted, I would prefer that the tie-in point was pulled back from the property line. Any off -site work requires an off -site grading easement. 20. The swale side slope next to Carpenter should not exceed 4:1. The drainage report needs to explain how the Carpenter Road swale will be affected by the ultimate improvements. How will the drainage work once the road is fully built out? 21. A few details are missing on the plans and I have tried to note them on the redlines. 22. A few of the "Match Sheet' comments on the plans have incorrect page numbers. I have tried to note them on the redlines. Fees and Permits: • The Comity has a Development Construction Permit and this application will be subject to the fees and regulations associated with that permit. Permit information can be obtained by contacting Andrew Barnebey at (970) 498-5729. • Engineering Staff would like to notify the applicant that Transportation Capital Expansion Fees will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. • This proposal lies in the Fossil Creek Basin and drainage fees will need to be calculated by Lisa Dunn, from this office. The list of fees will be forwarded to the Building Department and collected at the time of building permit application for each lot in the subdivision. • There may be additional City of Fort Collins fees associated with the work within the Carpenter Road right-of-way. Staff Recommendation: The comments above need to be addressed prior to final plat approval. The above comments are also noted on the red lined plans that I have returned to the design engineer. With the next submittal, the redlines should be returned with responses to the comments. Also with the next submittal, I would also like an opportunity to review the Development Agreement. Please feel free to contact me directly if you would like to discuss these comments. I can be reached at 970.498.5701. Thank von. c: Cityscape Inc, 3555 Stanford Road -Suite 105. Fort Collins, CO 80525 Northern Engineering (Attu Bud Curtis) 420 South Howes — Suite 202, Fort Collins CO 80521 City of Fort Collins Engineering (Attu Sheri Wamhoff) File h:ldevrevlplanchklprojectslcd's�aulumn creek cd\autumn creek cd final 2.doc