Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVERSIDE FIRST AND SIXTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-11-29i .a t l Description: a Applicant Wf, ✓LadmerCoun R d1 '``. � ty as mpact Fees ' 21 eetOvers¢ing Fees (Contact Matt Baker) ^ , bTransportation Impact Study (Contact Eric Bracke & Trans. Plan.) s` f6e Ication of Right -of -Way and Easements 6w-'Ws1p� i.-4 lG.�?_ r+ ❑ Eligible for Reimbursement l'�I�ow ❑ Eligble for Repay Agreement ❑ Re ay may be due ffbor/ *,fzG; ' �ity ' 6Q til Plans. DAUT DCP � � , Plat Re;jequired? t' Y / N% ;:b/L ❑ Impacts to COOT/County/Access Plans/Corridor Plans? Y % N . '`` ;. ❑ Suggest UtBity Coordination T : Y / N ❑ Suggest Design Seoping Meeting or Design Extent? (Centerline Profiles, Etc.)It' h Repair/Replace ?ny Damaged Curb, Gutter, SidevralkT� Alley Improvements uired? Underground arty Existing Overhead Utilities? N i Public Improvement* must be built aoccndIng to LCUASS ,: a p r 2 ass cvoo-��c'A�"tc>E Number: 9 Created: 12/31/2003 [12131/03] ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable) 1997 UFC 901.4.4 RESPONSE: Will comply Number: 10 Created: 12/31/2003 [12/31103] WATER SUPPLY: No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 RESPONSE: Understood Number: 11 Created: 12/31/2003 [12131/03] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: This proposed building shall be fire sprinkled. When any portion of the facility or any portion of a exterior wall of the first story of a building is located more then 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility it shall be fire sprinkled. 1997 UFC 902.2.1 RESPONSE: Building is fully fire -sprinkled Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 48 Created: 1/7/2004 As per conceptual comments, please discuss and investigate the outfall for this site. RESPONSE: A detailed discussion of the outfall has been provided. Number: 49 Created: 1/7/2004 Drainage easements are required for the water quality pond and storm sewers. RESPONSE: Easements will be provided by separate document Number: 50 Created: 1/7/2004 The water quality pond should be sized for all basins that drain in that direction, not just basin 1. RESPONSE: The pond is sized for all contributing basins Number: 51 Created: 1/7/2004 The drainage plan is incomplete. This plan should be completed enough in the first round to document sub -basins and flow paths. RESPONSE: The drainage plan is complete. Number: 58 Created: 1 /9/2004 Please include existing impervious area calculations to compare with proposed in the drainage report. Page 5 RESPONSE: Provided Topic: ErOS/on/Sediment Control Number: 59 Created: 1/9/2004 1. Please provide required calculations to support your plan (including surety calculation). RESPONSE: Calculations provided 2. Please delete all current erosion control notes on sheet #2 under the heading "grading. and Erosion Control Notes" and place on sheet #6 the most current (September, 2003) set of Fort Collins standard erosion control notes. RESPONSE: The notes have been revised 3. The upstream end of the 18" RCP in the northeast corner of the site should have a gravel inlet filter on it until the site is stabilized. RESPONSE: A gravel inlet filter has been provided Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Eric Bracke Topic. Traffic Number: 1 Created: 12/23/2003 [12123/03] The TIS was submitted with the site plan and is deemed acceptable. A variance will be required for the curb cut spacing on Riverside. Trip generation of the overall site is not expected to change significantly with the development. I would be comfortable in granting the variance. RESPONSE: Understood Department:, Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Transportation Number: 47 Created: 1 /7/2004 [1/7/04] Show all necessary access ramps associated with the handicap parking stalls. if the stalls are flush with the walkway then show the appropriate wheel stops for each stall on the plan sets. RESPONSE: Ramps and wheelstops have not been provided. We do not understand the need for this. Handicab signs will be installed. Number: 52 Created: 1/7/2004 [1M04] Directional access ramps are required at all driveway crossings. Please also keep in mind that the driveway crossings need to achieve the 2% grade to meet the American with Disability Act. RESPONSE: The driveway meets ADA standards for H/C accessibility. Directional ramps are not provided per response above Number: 55 Created: 1 /8/2004 [1/8/04] The public sidewalk along the Riverside Drive frontage needs to be detached from the curb. However, since this section of Riverside Drive is considered a constrained arterial Page 6 the standard cross section does not apply. Instead of the standard 10 foot parkway only an 8 foot parkway and 6 foot sidewalk is required from the back of the existing curb. RESPONSE: Detached sidewalk is not provided, see comments above Number: 56 Created: 1/8/2004 [1/8/04] Since all three proposed driveways will remain, and in order to improve pedestrian safety and achieve the required minimum Level of Service for a pedestrian crossing of Riverside Drive, the crosswalk will need to be relocated to the east side of the intersection with McHugh Street (see red lines). There will also need to be some Dedestrian crossinn pynt ieveis or the crosswalk (see attached pages from the LCUASS). These 3 improvements will allow for the development to achieve the minimum LOS for a pedestrian crossing of Riverside Drive. RESPONSE: The crosswalk has been relocated and midblock access ramps have been provided on both sides of Riverside. Signage will be provided. WE spoke with Doug Martine and have relocated the existing light in the proposed center drive approximately 50' west of it's present location. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 44 Created: 1/7/2004 [1/7/04] Were there water and sewer services to both buildings being demolished? If so, those services must be used or abandoned at the main. Clearly define the abandonment procedures for all existing services. RESPONSE: Limits of abandonment are clearly defined Number: 45 Created: 1/7/2004 [1/7/04] Show and label all curb stops and meter pits. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. RESPONSE: All curb stops and meter pits are defined Topic: Landscaping Number: 41 Created: 1/7/2004 [1 /7/04] Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distance on the landscape plans. RESPONSE: Understood Topic: Site Number: 42 Created: 1/7/2004 [1/7/04] Water mains may not extend under entry features (i.e. retaining walls, signs, etc.). RESPONSE: The entry sign has been relocated Number: 43 Created: 1/7/2004 Page 7 [1/7/04] Provide utility easements for all water mains, fire hydrants, and water services up to and including the curb stop. A water lines is considered a main if a fire hydrant is connected to it. The fire line must be connected to a main with a gate valve adjacent to the connection. RESPONSE: Easements provided Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic. Zoning Number: 3 Created: 12/24/2003 112/24/031 Per Sec. 3.2.2(J) and 3.2.1(E)(4) of the LUC, the landscape strip along the easterly side of the parking lot must be a minimum of 5' wide and contain one tree per 40 lineal feet. It doesn't appear that the width is 5' and that there are enough trees. RESPONSE: The site plan has been revised to have a 5' setback along this edge. We do not recommend tree plantings along this edge. This 5' area is a swale and tree health would not be good. The parking lot abuts a concrete masonry wall of an adjoining industrial use. Additional trees have been planted along the north edge of this parking lot to mitigate the lack of planting on the east edge. Number: 6 Created: 12/24/2003 [12/24/03] The site plan dimensions the parking stalls and drive aisles for the parking in the front of the building and the easterly side. But no dimensions are shown for the parking on the west side. The parking spaces in the double row of parking on the west side that does not have the walk separation must be 19' in depth. They appear to scale at only 171 . Therefore they need to be larger, but the 24' drive aisle width must also be maintained. The resubmittal should show the dimensions. RESPONSE: Plan has been modified to comply. Number: 7 Created: 12/24/2003 [12124/03] In.their conceptual review comment letter and their planning objectives it is implied that it is necessary for the project to comply with Sec. 3.5.3, or that 3.5.3(B)(2)(d)(c) allows for an exception to building design standards. However, per Section 4.23(E)(2)(a), the Section 3.5.3 standards do not apply to this type of development. RESPONSE: Understood. Thank you for pointing this out. Comments from Ted Shepard The proposed number of parking spaces, 151, exceeds the maximum allowable for general office (3 spaoes/1,000 square feet = 111) by 40 spaces. This is a significant deviation. Please refer to the Alternative Compliance, Section 3.2.2(K)(3) and Exception to the General Office Parking Standard, Section 3.2.2(K)(4). These sections allow an applicant to exceed the maximum allowable if the number of employees is known. The Planning Objectives refer to 190 employees being stationed in the new office building with the potential of up to 228. This means that there would be 194 square feet per employee in the short term and 162 square feet per employee in the long term on a gross basis. (With common areas, the actual space per employee will be less.) These appear to be very small work spaces. RESPONSE: A letter is attached with justification for additional parking Page 8 Documentation should be provided on how many spaces are considered customer only spaces. These spaces should be identified on the site plan. RESPONSE: Spaces have been identified Will these parking spaces also serve employees stationed in the other building? If so, please indicate approximately how many. RESPONSE: Parking is to serve office building only In order to justify the proposed parking, we would need to see documentation, on Fort Collins Coloradoan letterhead, explaining the staffing operational characteristics for this new office building. For example, will all 190 employees be active on the same shift? How many shifts will there be? Is there shift overlap? Staffing documentation would have to be accompanied by a floor plan of the employee work areas in order to justify the proposed number of parking spaces. RESPONSE: Letter provided Please refer to Section 3.5.3(D)(2-9) for the minimum architectural requirements. These requirements call for a recognizable base, middle and top. It may be that the flat roofline would need to articulated with a cornice or a parapet and that the base masonry material be of different texture or color. RESPONSE: The project is in an industrial zone district and does not have to meet this standard. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. As always, if you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely: Ted Shepard City Planner Page 9 Project Comments Sheet CityofFortCoWns Selected Departments Date: March 1, 2004 Project: FORT COLLINS COLORADOAN PDP - TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 25, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 15 Created: 1/6/2004 [2/23/041 Sheet 5 of the Utility Plans show a 6 easement, not 15'. The site and landscape plans do not show or dimension the easement, please provide. [1161041 A 15' utility easement is required along Riverside and must be dedicated by separate document if not platting. Only 6' is currently shown. Number: 16 Created: 1/6/2004 [2/23/041 All of the utilities have responded and no utility is willing to vacate the easement along Riverside. You may vacate the remaining easements. [1/6/041 A few of the outside utilities have responded to the vacation request to date. No agency is amiable to vacating the easement where it fronts Riverside and require that the easement above be dedicated as well. No objections to the remaining easement areas so far. Number: 17 Created: 1/6/2004 [2/23/041 Repeat comment. Please show all easements (existing and proposed) on all plan sets. [12123/031 The emergency access lane will need to be dedicated by separate document as well as any other utility or drainage easements required by other departments. You might want to create an exhibit showing what will be vacated and what will be dedicated so that we can make sure that everyone's on the same page. All easements must be shown on all plan sets (Landscape, Utility, and Site). Number: 21 Created: 1/6/2004 [2/23/041 Repeat comment, applies to all plan sets, all sheets. None of the plan sets/sheets are scannable. [116/041 See Appendix E-6 for scanability requirements. The current font size is too small in some cases and in others, overlapped and illegible. Number: 29 Created: 1 /6/2004 [2/23/0� eat�comment. Sig ature ' Dade CHECK HE I OU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _L Site � Util'1Drainage Report I Other tY �_ Redline Utility �_ Landscape Page 1 [1/61041 Site/Landscape/Utility • please coordinate the various comments under the different sections so that all plan sets present the same information. Any comment under "General" applies to all. Number: 57 Created: 1/9/2004 12/23/041 Please dimension the sidewalk and parkway along Riverside according to the criteria set below on all of the various plan sets. 11/9/041 This project is responsible for bringing their frontage up to current standards. Riverside is considered a constrained arterial and requires a total of 102' of ROW. The existing curbline will not move so from that point, measure 8' for the parkway and an additional 6' for the sidewalk. The back of walk will become the new ROW line. An additional 15' must be dedicated as a utility easement. Number: 90 Created: 3/1/2004 [3/11041 Striping is not required at the driveway entrances. Topic: Landscaping Number: 34 [2l23/04] Repeat comment. Created: 1 /6/2004 [1/6/04] See comments under General. Number: 80 [2I23/04] The western most driveway does not Created: 2/23/2004 match the driveway shown the on utility plans. Number: 81 [2/23/04] Show and dimension all easements. Created: 2/23/2004 Number: 82 [2/23/04] Show all utilities. Created: 2/23/2004 Number: 83 Created: 2/23/2004 [2l23/041 Label the proposed retaining wall. Topic: Site Number: 35 Created: 1/6/2004 [2/23/04] Repeat comment. [1/6/04] See comments under General. Number: 79 Created: 2/23/2004 (2/231041 Correct the label that reads "Lemay ROW: Topic: Utility Number: 20 Created: 1 /6/2004 [2/23/04] Repeat Please fill out line 48 of the General Notes. [1/6/04] Need to show the driveways on the properties immediately adjacent. If the driveway spacing does not meet the spacing requirements in LCUASS, a variance request is normally required. However, it was determined at the Transportation Coordination meeting on 1/8/4 that the proposed driveway locations were acceptable and that they were not making an existing condition any worse. The driveway locations were approved and a formal variance request is not required. Line 48 of the General Notes on the Utility Plans must be filled out with something to the effect of: A variance request to the driveway spacing along Riverside Avenue was granted. Number: 25 [2123/041 Repeat comment. Created: 1 /6/2004 [1/6/04] The City requires directional ramps at all intersections and driveways. currently the radial type is shown. Page 2 Number: 26 [2/23/04j Repeat comment. Please update the checklist and utilityCreated: 1 /6/2004 plans, then return with next round of re v [1/6/04] A revised checklist is being returned with this submittal and it reflects the new development review requirements for the first and final compliance rounds. The highlighted items are reviewed with the first round and must be complete before scheduling a hearing. The remaining items are reviewed during final compliance and must be complete prior to the plans being approved. Number: 27 Created: 1/6/2004 12/23/041 Repeat comment. [1/6/04] See Bob Zakely for the erosion controls specific to this project. Number: 30 Created: 1/6/2004 [2/23/041 Repeat comment. [1/6/04] Station or dimension the driveways at the PC from the lot line or? so that they can be easily and correctly surveyed in the field. Number: 32 12/23/041 Repeat comment. Created: 1/6/2004 [116104] Please provide spot elevations along Riverside's flowline and at the PCs of the driveways so that we can verify whether or not minimum grades are being met. Number: 33 Created: 1/6/2004 [2/23/04] Repeat comment. [1/6/04] Please see the redlines and checklist for further comments. Number: 61 Created: 2/23/2004 12/23/041 Cover Sheet: The Typical Street Section is labeled as "existing" but both existing and proposed is shown. Should show two separate sections, one existing and one for proposed. Number: 62 Created: 2/23/2004 12/23/041 Sheet 2: Line 14 must be filled out on the utility plans. Number: 63 Created: 2/23/2004 [2123/04] Sheet 2: Indent the second line of item 1 under C. See redlines. Number: 64 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/04] Sheet 5: Label the retaining wall. Number: 65 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/04] How does the west curb return of the western most driveway tie into the existing or proposed? Number: 66 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/04] Sheet 6: Label the retaining wall and reference the details on sheet 8 and 9. Number: 67 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/041 Sheet 6: Correct the misspelling, 6 utility easement (should be 15'), and label the dimensions called out. See redlines. Number: 68 [2/23/041 Sheet 6: Add the street cut note: Created: 2/23/2004 Page 3 Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number. 69 Created: 2/23/2004 12/23/041 Sheet 7: Addition required to Legend. See redlines. Number: 70 Created: 2/23/2004 [2123/041 Sheet 7: Incomplete spot elevations provided. Number: 71 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/041 Sheet 8: Label states that 4' retaining wall detail is provided on sheet C7. Details are shown on sheets 8 and 9, please correct. Number: 72 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/04] All arrows showing TW and BW do not actually point to anything. Please correct. Number: 73 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/041 Two different labels showing TW and BW on the retaining wall are pointing to the same place. Which one is correct? Number: 74 Created: 2/23/2004 P23104] Sheet 10: Compact Parking or Long Term Only sign missing. Number: 75 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/04] Sheet 11: Remove detail 7-20A (It's old) and replace it with 701. Number: 76 Created: 2/23/2004 [2123/041 Sheet 11: Please provide details 702, 707, 1601, 1602, 1606, and 1607. Number: 77 Created: 2/23/2004 [2123/041 Sheet 11 and 12: Label Cross Pan and Curb Opening Detail with "On Site". Number: 78 Created: 2/23/2004 [2123/04) Sheet 11: Label retaining wall detail. Please place with the other retaining wall details. Page 4 NENORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICESo INC. May 18, 2004 Ted Shepard City of Fort Collins Planning 281 North College Ave P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, CO 80522-0580 Project: Fort Collins Coloradoan — Response to comments dated 03/31/04 Dear Ted We have revised the plans for the Fort Collins Coloradoan per city comments dated 03/31/04. An easement document is being prepared and will be submitted next week. The easement dedication documents are attached for your review. Our responses are as follows: Water Wastewater —Jeff Hill General Comments • Cleanouts are no longer in vehicle traffic areas. A traffic rated cleanout detail is not required • Easements will be provided by separate document. • Your entire plan redlines have been addressed or responded to on the plans. Stormwater— Wes Lamarque • Drainage easements will be provided for the water quality pond. These will be provided along with the other easements that are being dedicated by separate document on the plan. • A site -specific water quality device is provided on the detail sheet. You will note that is labeled `modified for the Coloradoan". A detail showing how the plate will be attached to the wall is also included on the detail sheet. • Notes have been added as requested. • All of your plan and report redlines have been addressed or responded to on the plans or in the report. Engineering - Susan Joy All items indicated on Appendix E-4 are now included on the plan. We have worked on improving the scanability of the plans and feel that this is the best we can do. We will gladly provide the City a CD with the drawings if that will help. All of your plan redlines have been addressed or responded to on the plans. 420 SOUTH HOWES, SUITE 202 1 FORT COLLMS, CQLORADO 80521 / 970.221.4158 1 FAX 970.221.4159 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: December 16, 2003 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #41-03 FT. COLLINS COLORADO PDP — TYPE I (LUC) REU All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: January 7, 2003 Note Ine for future reference v c c5 s Koa,S Fag N/6 N. Li�.Y%p fix; „✓ �el,{Tc � woN�r WONT 1` '5 6AV T:�j t] 5/ Dr-- SL -a 2 Np v1 �Yte C/U/ Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape 2;! We feel that we have adequately addressed all comments. We look forward to submitting mylars in the near future. Please feel free to contact me with any questions concerning this project. CC: Corky Bradley, RB+B Architects Bruce Hendee, BHA Design Sincerely; Northern Engineering Services Mark Oberschmidt, PE Project Engineer Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City ofCity of F�l Stewart & Associates Date: 06/02/2004 c/o Jack Blake 103 South Meldrum Street Fort Collins, CO. 80526 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HECKART SUBDIVISION - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 16 Created: 11/26/2003 15/12/041 Repeat comment. Show and label building envelope, all plan sets. [4/12/04] Repeat comment. Show building envelope, all sheets, all plan sets. , /27 [11/26/031 Do not show the actual building but provide a building envelope instead. Number: 31 Created: 11/26/2003 [5/12/041 Repeat comment. Easements are not shown consistently between the various plan sets. The easements are shown differently and labeled differently on the plat, utility, site, and landscape plans. All of them need to match. [4/12/041 Repeat comment. Easements are still not shown correctly and they are not shown consistently between the various plan sets. [11/26/031 Correct the easement labels to read: 20' Emergency Access Easement [,24' Emergency Access and Utility Easement ` 10' Drainageand Utility Easeme t ' �p c �5plat � AP/1` ell !3 Number: 8 Created: 11/26/2003 [3/12/041 [4/12/041 [11/26/031 From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close. e.-7 l v Page 1 Topic: Utility Number: 18 Created: 11/26/2003 [5/12/041 Repeat comment. Please provide a ditch company signature block on the utility sheets. Will need to provide a letter of intent from the ditch company prior to being allowed to go to hearing • /S�prOJeCf 172.5 F/Ce-7 Od hB9//,7 [4/12/041 Repeat comment. Ditch signature block was only added to plat. D1-7 [11/26/031 Show the Ditch Company's easement on all plan sets and provide a New Mercer Signature block on the various plan sets. Number: 40 / Created: 11/26/2003 [5/12/041 Repeat comment. [4/12/041 Repeat comment. Please show the building envelope on the ©/[ plans and coordinate with PFA..p done- [11/26/031 Contact PFA as soon as possible. Lot 2 may be out of service and must be sprinklered. Lot 2 may not meet the 150' accessibility requirement. Number: 71 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/041 Sheet 4 - Please label the curb side of the ramps at the driveway entrances so that there is no confusion in the field when this is constructed. Number: 72 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/041 Sheet 4 - Please hatch the street cut using a large diagonal for scanability. da 7 e Number: 73 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/041 Sheet 5 - Label the building envelope. Remove the duplicated word in the rip rap label. Number: 74 Created: 5/12/2004 [5/12/041 Please dimension the narrowest width of the emergency access driv aisle. Is it;ess than FA's requirement? �G' IS �c I'I2�/ar✓�� ��ee pez iA,5 �gver�- er ` Department: Light & Power Issue Contact. Rob Irish Topic: Utility Number: 75 Created: 5/17/2004 [5/17/041 The 5' utility & drainage easement on the west side of the property is only adequate for Light & Power facilities. If gas or some other utility is going in this same easement there will not be enough separation. The easemen,t will need to be wider. Number: 76 Created: 5/17/2004 [5/17/041 Owner will need to coordinate meter location with Light & Power. Owner will be responsible for electric development charges & system modification charges if applicable. ,C90/� 090/�,e .r` Page 2 Number: 77 Created: 5/17/2004 [5/17/04] Pocket easement maybe required by owner to set pad - mounted transformer to feed additional load. This transformer would need to be located within 10, of a paved or truck accessible surface. op/ 141y Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: es Camargue Topic: Utility Number: 79 Created: 5/20/2004 Please provide a signature block for the ditch company on the util't p ans. Department: Water Wastewater Issueoatact: Jeff Hill Topic: Utility Number: 78 Created: 5/18/2004 [5/18/041 No comments Be sure a9d return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, A��"`i�, City Planner Cc: Susan Joy Rob Irish Frank Heckart Page 3 FINAL PLAN REVISIONS COMMENT SHEET DATE: June 4, 2004 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #41-03 Fort Collins Coloradoan PDP - Final Plan Revisions All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: June 23, 2004 Note - Please identifv your redlines or future reference Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet CitvofFortCollins Selected Departments Date: June 23, 2004 Project: FORT COLLINS COLORADOAN PDP - TYPE I (LUC) AND FINAL PLAN All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 23, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number. 15 cated Created: 1/6/2004 separate e] documen]t" on the various plan ets.easement being ) Any existing easement needs to berate document needs to be labeled alabeled exas istlg 'dedicated by [21231041 Sheet 5 of the Utility Plans straw a 6' easement, not 15'. The site and landscape plans do not show or dimension the easement, please provide. [1/61041 A 15' utility easement is required along Riverside and must be dedicated by separate document if not platting. Only 6' is currently shown. Number: 17 (6/22/041 Created: 1 /6/2004 13/30/041 Any easement being dedicated by separate document needs to be labeled as being "dedicated by separate document" on the various plan sets. Any existing easement needs to be labeled as "existing". [2123/041 Sheet 5 of the Utility Plans show a 6' easement, not 15'. The site and landscape plans do not show or dimension the easement, please provide. 11/6011 A 16 utility easement is required along Riverside and must be dedicated by separate document if not platting. Only 6' is currently shown. Number: 21 Created: 1 /6/2004 I6/221041 There are still scanning issues. See comments under Site and Landscape. [3130/041 Repeat comment. The utility and landscape plans are not scannable and we will not approve them until they are. I would be happy to meet with you to discuss appendix E6 or any other questions you have about scannability. [2/23/04] Repeat comment, a lies to all plan sets, all sheets. None of the plan sets/sheets are scannable. St:7re Z3 Date CHECK isIkgot YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat / Site Drainage Report �_ Other Utility X Redline Utility _� Landscape Page 1 [1/61041 See Appendix E-6 for scanability requirements. The current font size overlapped and Illegible. is too small in some cases and in others, Number: 28 Created: 1/6/2004 1612 O41 Repeat. The utility plans need to show a Phase line, see comments under "Utility". 13/30/041 [1/6/041 There is phasing for this project and the plans do not show it. Please show phasing (parking lot, erosion control, etc) on the appropriate sheets as well as the Site and Landscape plans. All plan sets need to present the same information. Number: 108 Created: 6/22/2004 16/22/041 The ramps at the driveways are not drawn correctly and do not meet the standard as shown. Please correct all plans (site, land, utility). Topic: Landscaping Number. 81 Created: 2/23/2004 16/22/041 [3/31/041 Repeat comment. Please label the easements correctly. See redlines. 12123104] Show and dimension all easements. Topic: Site Number: 92 16/22/041 Repeat comment. Created: 3/31/2004 [3/311041 All existing easements need to be labeled as "existing", all proposed easements to be dedicated by separate document need to be labeled as "to be dedicated by separate document". Number. 107[6/2Created: 6/22/2004 See 1041 reclines. See Appendix E6 for scanning requirements (ie: minimum greyscale). Remove all shading as it will not scan. See Topic: Utility Number: 32 Created: 1 /6/2004 16/22/041 Sheet 7 now sheet 8 - Repeat. Please show all 4 lots comers with spot elevations. Also please provide the flowline along Riverside - the spot elevations are there but the flowline itself is not. [3/30/04] Repeat comment. Sheet 7 is still missing the comer of this project. Please provide this information. 12/23/041 1116/04] Please provide spot elevations along Riverside's flowline and at the PCs of the driveways so that we can verify whether or not minimum grades are being met. Number: 66 Created: 2/23/2004 [04] Any retaining wall over 30" requires handrails. Please provide finish information (class 5?). [3/30/041 You've added a retaining wall detail to sheet 11 with the latest round. Please revise the note requested below to include sheet 11 as well or put all the retaining wall details together so that you only have to reference one sheet. [2/23/04] Sheet 6: Label the retaining wall and reference the details on sheet 8 and 9. Number: 70 -_ _ _. _ _-_ Created: 2/23/2004 [6/22104] Repeat comment. - [3/30/04] Repeat comment. Missing two lot comers and missing the spots around the curb return in the eastern comer. The curb return is not even shown in its entirety, please provide. 12/23104] Sheet 7: Incomplete spot elevations provided. Number: 96 Created: 3/31 /2004 Page 2 [601041 Repeat. Please see E6 for minimum font size and greyscale. Please show the existing concrete structure that's to be removed. (3/311041 Sheet 3 - Remove all shading and replace with building outlines. The shaded areas will not scan. Correct all overlapped labeling and please see Appendix E6 for other scanning requirements regarding minimum grey scales and pen weights. Number: 98 Created: 3/31/2004 [6/22/04] Sheet 5 now sheet 6 - repeat comment. Remove shading for a nability. Spell out "drainage semen a drainage and utility easement". See redlines. (3/311041 Sheet 5 - Will not scan for same reasons mentioned before. Label drainage easement, label existing easements as "existing", see redlines, and correct retaining wall note. Number: 99 Created: 3/31/2004 [6/22/04] Sheet 6 now sheet 7 - A new manhole has been added In the middle of a ramp. Please relocate. See redlines for approximate limits of the street cut per Lance Newlin, Chief Inspector. Show phase line. [3/31/041 Sheet 6 - Remove note to vacate existing utility easement along Riverside as it is not necessary (see earlier comment). Correct the asphalt patch note to reference note 10, sheet 6. This sheet will not scan for same reasons mentioned earlier. Number: 100 Created: 3/31/2004 [622104] Sheet 7 now sheet 8 - repeat. Please provide spot elevations for all lot comers. Need to show phasing [3131/041 Sheet 7 - Please provide the note shown in the checklist, Appendix E4, section ll, paragraph E. Correct all scanning issues. Please provide spot elevations for ALL lot comers. Number: 109 Created: 6/22/2004 [6/22/04] Sheet 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 11 - show phasing line. Number: 110 Created: 6/22/2004 [6122/04] See redlines for other comments. Page 3 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Citv of Fort Collins Department: Stormwater Utility Date: June 24, 2004 Project: FORT COLLINS COLORADOAN PDP - TYPE I (LUC) AND FINAL PLAN All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 23, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 49 Created: 1/7/2004 [6/22/041 [3/30/041 [2/27/04] Reminder Comment Drainage easements are required for the water quality pond and storm sewers. Number: 88 [6/22/041 Created: 2/27/2004 [3/30/04] Please also include a detail for the attachment of the orifice plate and well screen to the retaining wall. Currently, the orifice and well sreen details are only included. At final review, please include a site speck water quality outlet structure detail on the plans. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 87 Created: 2/27/2004 [6/24/04] Repeat Comment [3/30/04] Repeat Comment 1. Previous note #2 has not been addressed. Also include a note stating that all disturbed areas are to be seeded and mulched. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site 3 Lc5Drainage Report Other- 7- Utility Redline Utility Landsca Page 1 Ki Project Comments Sheet W�'�' City of FortCollins Selected Departments Date: January 9, 2004 Project: FORT COLLINS COLORADOAN PDP - TYPE I (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 07, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] The project title is not consistent within the various plan sets. All sets should be labeled "Fort Collins Coloradoan". Number: 15 Created: 1/6/2004 Only 1 is currently shown. A 15 utility easement Is required along Riverside and must be dedicated by separate document if not platting Only Number: 16 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] A few of the outside utilities have responded to the vacation request to date. No agency is amiable to vacating the easement where it fronts Riverside and require that the easement above be dedicated as well. No objections to the remaining easement areas so far. Number: 17 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] The emergency access lane will need to be dedicated by separate document as well as any other utility or drainage easements required by other departments. You might want to create an exhibit showing what will be vacated and what will be dedicated so that we can make sure that everyone's on the same page. All easements must be shown on all plan sets (Landscape, Utility, and Site). Number. 18 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] The plans indicate offsite drainage to the east. Please provide an easement from the adjacent property owner allowing this to occur. At the very least, we will need a letter of intent prior to going to hearing. Number: 20 Created: 1/6/2004 11/6104] Need to show the driveways on the properties immediately adjacent. If the driveway spacing does not meet the spacing requirements in LCUASS, a variance request is normally required. However, it was determined at the Transportation Coordination meeting on 1/8/4 that the proposed driveway locations were acceptable and that they were not making an existing condition any worse. The driveway locations were approved and a formal variance request is not required. Line 48 of the General Notes on the Utility Plans must be filled out with something to the effect of: A variance request to the drivewa spacing along Riverside Avenue was granted. r / Signatrrre� ate CHECK HERE &OU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report / _ Utility Redline Utility / Landscape Page 1 Number: 21 Created: 1/6/2004 11/6/041 See Appendix E-6 for scanability, requirements. The current font size is too small in some cases and in others, overlapped and illegible. Number: 23 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Dimension all drive aisles. Dimension all parking stalls widths and depths. Some stalls do not appear to meet standards. Number. 25 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/61041 The City requires directional ramps at all intersections and driveways. Currently the radial type is shown. Number. 29 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Site/Landscape/Utility - please coordinate the various comments under the different sections so that all plan sets present the same information. Any comment under "General' applies to all. Number: 57 Created: 1 /9/2004 (1/9/04] This project is responsible for bringing their frontage up to current standards. Riverside is considered a constrained arterial and requires a total of 102' of ROW. The existing curbline will not move so from that point, measure 8' for the parkway and an additional 6' for the sidewalk. The back of walk will become the new ROW line. An additional 15' must be dedicated as a utility easement. Topic: Landscaping Number: 34 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] See comments under General. Topic: Site Number: 35 [1/6/04] See comments under General. Created: 1/6/2004 Number: 36 [1/6/04] Remove the contours. Created: 1/6/2004 Number: 37 [1/61041 Remove the landscaping. Created: 1 /6/2004 Number: 38 [1/61041 Dimension all drive aisles and parking stalls. Created: 1 /6/2004 Some stalls do not appear to meet standard. Topic: Utility Number: 26 Created: 1/6/2004 11/6/041 A revised checklist is being returned with this submittal and it reflects the new development review requirements for the first and final compliance rounds. The highlighted Items are reviewed with the first round and must be complete before scheduling a hearing. The remaining items are reviewed during final compliance and must be complete prior to the plans being approved. Number: 27 Created: 1 /6/2004 1116104] See Bob Zakely for the erosion controls specific to this project. Number: 28 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/041 There is phasing for this project and the plans do not show it. Please show phasing (parking lot, erosion control, etc) on the appropriate sheets as well as the Site and Landscape plans. All plan sets need to present the same information. Number: 30 Created: 1/6/2004 Surveyed in the Station or dimension the driveways at the PC from the lot line or 7 so that they can be easily and correctly surveyfield. Page 2 Number: 32 Created: 1/6/2004 whether or not minimum gradess are ether Please provide spot elevations ns along Riverside's flowline and at the PCs of the driveways so that we can verify whether being met. Number: 33 Created: 1/6/2004 11/6/04] Please see the redlines and checklist for further comments. Page 3 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cityof Fod Collins BHA DESIGN Date: 1/9/2004 JENNY TORREY 4803 INNOVATION DR FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for FORT COLLINS COLORADOAN PDP - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] The project title is not consistent within the various plan sets. All sets should be labeled "Fort Collins Coloradoan". RESPONSE: Understood -All sheets have been corrected Number: 15 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] A 15' utility easement is required along Riverside and must be dedicated by separate document if not platting. Only 6' is currently shown. RESPONSE: Easement dedication documents will be provided Number: 16 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] A few of the outside utilities have responded to the vacation request to date. No agency is amiable to vacating the easement where it fronts Riverside and require that the easement above be dedicated as well. No objections to the remaining easement areas so far. RESPONSE: Understood -please notify us if there are any objections Number: 17 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] The emergency access lane will need to be dedicated by separate document as well as any other utility or drainage easements required by other departments. You might want to create an exhibit showing what will be vacated and what will be dedicated so that we can make sure that everyone's on the same page. All easements must be shown on all plan sets (Landscape, Utility, and Site). RESPONSE: Understood Number: 18 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] The plans indicate offsite drainage to the east. Please provide an easement from the adjacent property owner allowing this to occur. At the very least, we will need a letter of intent prior to going to hearing. RESPONSE: Understood- Grading has been redirected so that their will be no drainage directly into the existing swale as shown in the previous grading plan. Number: 20 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Need to show the driveways on the properties immediately adjacent. If the driveway spacing does not meet the spacing requirements in LCUASS, a variance request Page 1 is normally required. However, it was determined at the Transportation Coordination meeting on 1/8/4 that the proposed driveway locations were acceptable and that they were not making an existing condition any worse. The driveway locations were approved and a formal variance request is not required. Line 48 of the General Notes on the Utility Plans must be filled out with something to the effect of: A variance request to the driveway spacing along Riverside Avenue was granted. RESPONSE: Line 48 has been updated showing approval of the variance request. Number. 21 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] See Appendix E-6 for scanability requirements. The current font size is too small in some cases and in others, overlapped and illegible. RESPONSE: Plans have been revised to meet scanability requirements Number. 23 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Dimension all drive aisles. Dimension all parking stalls widths and depths. Some stalls do not appear to meet standards. RESPONSE: Done —AII drive aisles and parking stalls have been dimensioned Number: 25 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] The City requires directional ramps at all intersections and driveways. Currently the radial type is shown. RESPONSE: Directional ramps are not provided for the following reasons. We do not anticipate pedestrian traffic crossing Riverside at driveways due to the level of traffic on Riverside. A midblock ramp will be provided at the relocated crossing per another of the City comments. Number: 29 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Site/Landscape/Utility - please coordinate the various comments under the different sections so that all plan sets present the same information. Any comment under "General" applies to all. RESPONSE: Understood Number. 57 Created: 1/9/2004 [1/9/04] This project is responsible for bringing their frontage up to current standards. Riverside is considered a constrained arterial and requires a total of 102' of ROW. The existing curbline will not move so from that point, measure 8' for the parkway and an additional 6' for the sidewalk. The back of walk will become the new ROW line. An additional 15' must be dedicated as a utility easement. RESPONSE: Done- A 15' easement has been provided. The existing sidewalk will be removed and a detached sidewalk will be provided per our discussions with City staff on February 2, 2004. Topic: Landscaping Number: 34 Created: 1 /612004 [1/6/04] See comments under General. Page 2 RESPONSE: Reviewed and responded Topic: Site Number: 35 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] See comments under General. RESPONSE: Reviewed and understood Number: 36 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Remove the contours. RESPONSE: Done Number: 37 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Remove the landscaping. RESPONSE: Done Number: 38 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] Dimension all drive aisles and parking stalls. Some stalls do not appear to meet standard. RESPONSE: Done Topic: Utility Number: 26 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] A revised checklist is being returned with this submittal and it reflects the new development review requirements for the first and final compliance rounds. The highlighted items are reviewed with the first round and must be complete before scheduling a hearing. The remaining items are reviewed during final compliance and must be complete prior to the plans being approved. RESPONSE: Understood Number: 27 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] See Bob Zakely for the erosion controls specific to this project. RESPONSE: Done Number: 28 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6/04] There is phasing for this project and the plans do not show it. Please show phasing (parking lot, erosion control, etc) on the appropriate sheets as well as the Site and Landscape plans. All plan sets need to present the same information. RESPONSE: The project site plan as submitted will not be phased. Future expansion to the Coloradoan facilities will be presented as a separate plan(s) submittal. Future expansion is subject to change so it would not be valid to present more than the current plan. Number: 30 Created: 1/6/2004 [1/6104] Station or dimension the driveways at the PC from the lot line or? so that they can be easily and correctly surveyed in the field. Page 3 RESPONSE: Dimensioning is provided. Number: 32 Created: 1/6/2004 [116/041 Please provide spot elevations along Riverside's flowline and at the PCs of the driveways so that we can verify whether or not minimum grades are being met. RESPONSE: Spot elevations are provided. Number: 33 Created: 1 /6/2004 (1/6/04] Please see the redlines and checklist for further comments. RESPONSE: Reviewed and responded Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Landscaping Number: 5 Created: 12/24/2003 [12/241031 Any street trees added along Riverside must be 40 ft. from the relocated streetlight. RESPONSE: Comments 14 & 29 appear to be the only ones that are pertinent, Landscape Plan has been changed as in item 14 and utilities and easements have been coordinate Topic: Light & Power Number: 2 Created: 12/24/2003 [12/24/031 A portion of electric development charges were paid when Collins Cashway developed. This project will be responsible for additional Electric Capacity Fee and system modification costs. RESPONSE: Understood. Paid at time of permitting as required. Thank you for noting credit. Number: 4 Created: 12/24/2003 [12/24/031 The developer will need to supply a Commercial Service (C-1) form and coordinate a transformer location with Light & Power Engineering (970)221-6700. RESPONSE: Understood Department: PFA ' Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: Zoning Number: 8 Created: 12/31/2003 [12/31/031 FIRE LANE: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. The criteria for the fire lane contain several conditions that must be meet. 1. The minimum width shall be 20 feet. 2. Inside turning radius shall be 25 feet and the outside turning radius shall be 50 feet. 3. Compacted roadbase shall be used during the construction phase only. The permanent fire lane shall consist of asphalt or concrete and shall be required to support 40 tons. 4. The fire lane shall be platted as an " Emergency Access Easement' on the final plat. Please contact Michael A. Chavez with Poudre Fire Authority at 416-2869 regarding location of the fire lane. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3, 901.4.2, 902.2.1,-FCLUC RESPONSE: Understood Page 4