HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAXFIELD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-11-20FINAL PLAN
REVISION COMMENT
SHEET
DATE: June 14, 2006
TO: Engineering
PROJECT PLANNER: Shelby Sommer
#5-06A Front Porch Property, 1234 W. Prospect Rd — Final
Plans
SECOND ROUND OF FINAL PLAN REVIEW
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff
review meeting:
June 21, 2006
Note -Please identify your redlines for future reference
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
City Comments (dated 05/26/06)
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning
Topic: General
Number: 36
[5/26/06] No further comments.
Acknowledged.
Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Created: 5/26/2006
Please submit plans for one quick final round of review.
Department: Engineering Top/c: General Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Number: 19 Created: 3/31/2006
[5/18106] Thank you for adding this note as requested, however; we've just been given the
official" notice to be used where E1 and E2 are not being shown in their entirety. Please
replace the earlier note with this one (without the quotes):
"General Construction Notes #1 through 18, 20 through 39, and 42 through.46 as listed in
Appendix E-1 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) shall apply
and be followed for this project."
"The Construction Notes under subsection Street Improvement Notes and Traffic Signing,
and Pavement Marking Construction Notes in Appendix E-2 of the Larimer County Urban
Area Street Standards (LCUASS) shall apply and be followed by this project as applicable."
Acknowledged. Notes have been added.
[3/31/06] Place a note on the cover sheet: See Appendix E1 and E2 of the Larimer County
Urban Area Street Standards'for other requirements.
Acknowledged. Note has been added.
Number: 20 Created: 3/3112006
[5/18/06) Still need to label and dimension the existing UE.
[3/31/06] Dimension all row from centerline. Show, label and dimension all easements.
Show all utilities.
There are no easements on the property. According to Steve Smith's discussion with Susan
Joj, no easement dedication will be required.. A note has been added to the site plan. and
grading plan concerning existing utilities.
Number: 22 Created: 3/31/2006
(5/18/061 You are still treating the driveway as if its two separate driveways and not showing
any information on the neighboring property. Please show the existing features as
previously discussed and show how your improvements are tying into the existing. The
driveway needs to be paved for the entire existing width up to the point the retaining wall
starts and not just a portion thereof (as in only paving 24' wide). Grading needs to be shown
for a minimum of 50' offsite to the west. See redlines or we can meet one more time if you
have any questions.
Acknowledged. Additional topo and grading has been shown to 50' feet as appropriate.
Page 2
[3/31/06] Provide spot elevations at the flow line, property line and grade information.
Maximum grade allowed for a driveway is 8%. See detail 707 for all other grade
requirements,
Acknowledged. Spot elevations are provided. Maximum grade for driveway is 8%.
Number: 25 Created: 3/3112006
[5/18/06] Since no more than 750 sf of drainage is allowed across a public sidewalk, you
might want to construct a crosspan to divert the drainage to the east side and then construct
a swale to direct the water to the sidewalk chase. Will need to construct the sidewalk chase
per detail DI and show this detail on the plan sets. See stormwater for the detail as it is
not in the LCUASS.
[3/31/06] Please confirm that no more than 750sf is draining across the public sidewalk.
Acknowledged. Approximately 590 sf of the driveway, as related to this property, drains
across the public sidewalk. Crosspan and sidewalk chase are shown.
Number: 27 Created: 3/31/2006
(5/18/06] In lieu of placing the details on the plan sets, please place a note on the plans to
see drawings 701, 706, 1601, and 1602 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
for driveway, curb & gutter and sidewalk requirements.
[3/31/06] Please provide details 701, 702, 1601, 1602 and 707.
Acknowledged. Note regarding details 701, 702, 1601, 1602 and 707 have been added.
added. -
Number: 28 Created: 3/31/2006
[5/18/06] A DA will not be required for this project so the repay amount will only show up
when you apply for your building permit. A building permit will not be issued until the City
has received the repay.
[3/31/06] Please contact Matt Baker at 221-6605 for the repay owed for the Prospect Road
improvements. This amount will be added into the Development Agreement and due prior
to starting work.
Acknowledged.
Number: 31 Created: 5/18/2006
[5/18/06] Please provide a letter from the neighboring property owner giving you permission
to make the proposed improvements on their property,
Acknowledged and provided under separate cover.
Number: 32 Created: 5/18/2006
[5/18/06] Label existing curb type. Dimension existing sidewalk. Do not dimension the
driveway individually by lot, dimension it as a single driveway width of 27.5'.
Acknowledged. Curb type labeled and driveway dimensioned as single driveway.
Page 3
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill
Topic: General
Number: 33 Created: 5/24/2006
[6/241061 No comments or concerns.
Acknowledged.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Topic: Stormwater Issue Contact; Wes Lamarque
Number: 34 Created: 5/24/2006
[5/24/06] Please submit an erosion control plan per City criteria.
Acknowledged. Erosion control plan is now shown on sheet GR2.
Number: 35 Created: 5/25/2006
[5/25/06] Please provide better documentation regarding the additional impervious area.
There seems to be more additional impervious area than the 893 sf stated.
Acknowledged. Refer to Drainage addendum letter dated May 25, 2006 and submitted
under separate cover.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit,
Acknowledged.. See attached.
Page 4