HomeMy WebLinkAboutHUNTINGTON HILLS PUD SEVENTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-02-06n
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: November 12, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #11-81R Huntington Hills, 7th Filing -
Preliminary - P.U.D. - LDGS
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
December 9,1998
The following are my comments on the submitted documents:
Highcastle Drive
This street is on the City Master Street Plan as passing through this site from the
Miramont development to Fossil Creek Parkway. This connection must be
provided by this development, unless an alternative connection is made by way of
Roma Valley Drive in Miramont connecting to Mail Creek Lane. City staff will
pursue a change in the Master Street Plan for the alternative connection. This
alternative connection will require City Council approval, following a public
hearing and support from the County.
The development's Transportation Impact Study (TIS) shows traffic numbers
indicating the Roma Valley/Mail Creek Lane connection will be a local connector
street. This would equate to a collector street in the current Larimer County
Urban Growth Area Street Standards. In addition to Roma Valley Drive having to
(Continued on Page 2)
Date:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
�PHt _vSRe sinage R" ✓0 v Sri
�tftiEty _ Redline Utility -Lands*
`,r
!WA
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: August 4, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #11-81S Huntington Hills PUD, 7th Filing
Final LDGS
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: August 18, 1999
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
General Comments
• It was discussed that this development may proceed for hearing at P&Z on September 16.
Fossil Creek Parkway Extension
Design
• The design elements of the roadway extension will be coordinated through Matt Baker in
Street Oversizing. The developer will be responsible for partial funding of the roadway.
• Please show the radii being used at all street intersections.
• Please note the corrections on the details sheet.
Signing and Striving
• Please show crosswalks on the plan set, including the raised crosswalk at Mail Creek Lane
and Fossil Creek Parkway.
• As noted by our Traffic Engineer, include the left -turn lane onto Mail Creek Lane heading
southbound on Fossil Creek Parkway
Mail Creek Lane Design
• The design for Mail Creek Lane should be included with the Huntington Hills P.U.D. 71"
Filing submittal and is not part of the Fossil Creek Parkway Extension Plans. It is
understood that Mail Creek Lane will have curb and gutter on the east side of the road only.
Date: L Signature: _ZiL
PLEASE SE D C PIES E rPLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: R1 SITE
64 UTILITY NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
LANDSCAPE
140
• Please provide more detail on the Mail Creek Lane design on sheet 5 (i.e., spot elevations
and contours on the plan view, drainage improvements on the profile view.)
Site Plan
• Note the utility easements proposed with the project.
Plat
• The Emergency Access Easement is correctly noted, however to ensure that access is allowed
for vehicles, the label should be expanded to an "Access and Emergency Access Easement".
• The approval block for this project should be with the Planning and Zoning Board, signed by
the Planning and Zoning Board Secretary, not approved by the Planning Director.
• Show all reception Ws on the plat.
Utility Plans
• Please provide more detail on the existing grading contours. There are existing contours on
the plan without any elevations noted.
• Provide an exhibit sheet of all the off -site easements required with this project.
• Please provide signed and stamped structural calculations for the bridge design.
• Sheet 14 shows a detail for "Metal Sidewalk Culvert For Drive -over Curb, Gutter and
Sidewalk", there does not appear to be any drive -over curb and gutter indicated on the
grading plan. Please clarify this.
• For flow coming off of the parking lot/drive aisle, a concrete culvert is required (for flow
entering, metal is sufficient.)
• A 10' easement is shown along Fossil Creek Parkway, however a 15' easement is shown on
the plat.
• A report regarding the bridge structure was submitted to Stormwater from Anderson
Consulting Engineers on August 10`s. Stormwater noted that the details for the bridge
differed from the utility plans. Please ensure that the utility plans coincide with this report.
• The City Engineer has granted the variance for the sag vertical curve south of the bridge.
• Please provide more information on the pedestrian bridge (see details).
(see plans for any additional comments)
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: August 4, 1999 TO: Mapping
PROJECT: #11-81S Huntington Hills PUD 7t' Filing- Final
Fossil Creek Parkway Extension
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the
staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 18,1999
No Comment
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
1Z
L>6 f C I?
Y
A ii 1J e
W it1 T11iS lei v Z S S-k,w� - ! 1'!S GC i S! O s 'TNT R.%
GC' `I Ha ?c4V• IT Cc,J,t: 0000cr+7co Bf nAT
Cu 1-t Tt is R-cb s ti c,
TtAs
Ti-ta 1�HT Mv�i i3�
4J SHuti,l crt-j ?N!s Cc 41- T,1111 6o ClS
Sias of THor AaKw4 Aug,
Fug TNT OFF S,7-G-
j LUilAT Agog; 4 U-ri i rz, CA SCMervT
S106 OF Tti'G Ifra n tL-W (%
Date:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ PId _ SiW _ ihainap Repot
— UbIfl9 — Redline Udih _ Ieadscape
O-�
A LJij Y"64,s C,lTSJ
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: August 4, 1999 TO: Traffic Ops
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Parkway Improvements & Mail
Creek Lane Improvements — Utility Plans
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the
staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 18,1999
❑ No Comment
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
AUG 1 p 7999
Date: %/,' Signature:_
Ma HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ PW _ site _ Drainage Report _ Odw
—MY — Redline lam' _ ladsW
01/24/2000 11:03 9702260204 TST INC PAGE 02
F...EVIS1ON
4Utj
COMMENT SHtE ZI
DATE: August 4, 1999 TO: Trans. Planning
t �� •
PROJECT: #11-81S Huntington Hills P& 7' Filing- Final
Fossil Creek Parlmay Extension
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the
staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 18,1999
0 No Comment o..* 4w: egAM S,
® Problems or Concerns (see below or a }-
Date: 8r/ 17/AI SIV28u —
CW HAS IF YOU M TO Rli(Y M COM OF RHVHt M
Pk Sh _amp 14M _060
_Wh _hamuft I
01/24/2000 11:03
9702260204
TST INC
'fto
PAGE 03
10
96
`'' Of Fort CommMEN PROJECT
COMMENT
SHEET
Current Planning
DATE: August 17,1999 TO: Trans. Planning
PROJECT: 1011-81S Huntington HMs_PUD 7t6 Filbig•Final
Fossil Creek Parkway Extension
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no,later than the staff review meeting: .
Wednesday, August 18,1999
• 4' sidewaiks should be 4.5' per Pedestrian LOS manual. D i E n ems++�+^•++�
• Whet are the dimensions of the T ' mleeting Roma Valley Drive to the Parks
Trail?
Date: August 17. 1999 Signature: mil' Gr�'� 4g�
•I wish to receive copies of the revisions, please.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: August 27, 1999 DEPT: Stormwater
PROJECT: Huntington Hills, 7th Filing (Fossil Creek
Parkway Extension)
Note: The following comments are regarding the floodplain analysis for Fossil Creek
Parkway. Please address these comments along with the comments dated August 17,
1999. Please submit the drainage report, utility plans and floodplain analysis as a single
resubmittal.
The City set forth the criteria that since the bridge can not stay outside the buffer
limits completely, then the bridge needed to at least span the top width of the channel.
Per submitted plans, the bridge is still encroaching into the top width of the channel
and thus putting a "hard point' in that top -width area. Please describe why you feel
that a "variance" from the above criteria should be granted. Describe any potential
upstream or downstream stability impacts.
RESPONSE:
2. Section 1.2 discusses flooding history for the project area. Please also include
discussion about the July 1997 flood for this area. Fossil Creek overtopped Trilby
Road and damaged the road and the embankment.
RESPONSE:
3. Chapter IV and Section 4.1 state "Corrective Effective". Please revise these titles to
state "Corrected Effective".
RESPONSE:
Date: Cl Signature:
cc�fils
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIL
PLAT SITE DRAINAGE REPORT POTHE= ...���,,.5///
TILITY EDLINE UTILITY LANDSCAPE 15
�-�I c
4. The proposed condition floodplain extends beyond the corrected effective floodplain
even though there is no increase in water surface elevation. This change to the
floodplain is because of the proposed bike path entering and exiting the bridge.
Please discuss this change to the floodplain limits and verify if any property owners
are impacted by the revised floodplain.
RESPONSE:
5. Please add discussion in the text regarding the "worst case scenario' for the bridge as
requested in the floodplain report guidelines. Please answer the question of where the
water goes if the bridge becomes completely clogged.
RESPONSE:
6. Please add a berm around the building on the east side of the low point in Fossil
Creek Parkway to protect the building if the bridge becomes clogged.
RESPONSE:
Please provide details for the construction of the trench rock bank protection on the
utility plans. Please specify details such as the width and depth of the trench and the
size and type of rock. A note will be needed stating the existing creek bank shall not
be disturbed due to excavation of the trench. Please show trench excavation limits
and show the minimum distance from the bank to the trench required so the bank
does not fail. Please show a cross-section of the creek the trench and the sidewalk.
Also, a note stating the trench will be covered with topsoil and re -seeded will be
needed.
RESPONSE:
Please provide details of the rock bank protection for under the bridge and
downstream of the bridge. What type of rock will this be? How deep? The rock will
need to be buried and re -seeded, except for the areas under the bridge. Also, the
extent of the riprap shown on cross-section 3 on sheet S3 does not match the extent of
the riprap shown on sheet 4. Please revise sheet S3 to match sheet 4.
RESPONSE:
%W
Please show a detail of the rock grade control on sheet 4 of the utility plans. The rock
should be buried.
RESPONSE:
10. Please show the creek contours for the bend immediately upstream of the bridge on
sheet 2 of the floodplain report.
RESPONSE:
11. Please revise the outlet of storm sewer ST-4 so that the end of the pipe and riprap is
set back from the creek. The end of the pipe and riprap should not extend into creek
bed. Please show all necessary regrading for installation of the pipe.
RESPONSE:
12. Please state water surface elevation on all floodplain exhibits.
RESPONSE:
13. Please provide a legend for all floodplain exhibits.
RESPONSE:
14. Please state the vertical datum on all floodplain exhibits.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the redline report and plans for additional review comments.
%W
n
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 12,1999 DEPT:
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7ah Filing
All comments must be received by Marc Virata no later than:
December 3,1999
*No Comment
K Problems or oncerns see below or attached)
0,-v /� j( 17 kD)
,Veect -0, o zch Sic!P tas
gve.rt,
Date /% " q r T S signature -
Please send copies
of marked revisions
_Plat Site
Utility _Landscape ,.� 0 NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
City of Fort Collins
0
Huntington Hills, 7s' Filing - Preliminary - PUD -LDGS December 14, 1999
be designed and constructed to standards, this development must upgrade Mail
Creek Lane along the east side adjoining this development between Roma Valley
Drive and Fossil Creek Parkway. The upgrade shall include pavement, curb,
gutter, sidewalk and lengthening of the Mail Creek Lane culvert crossing.
Fossil Creek Parkway
2. Submit utility plans for Fossil Creek Parkway. Plans must be submitted with this
project for the design of Fossil Creek Parkway (including the bridge over Fossil
Creek) between the two existing ends. This project has no access without it. In
addition, the street must be constructed before any building permits can be issued
for this development.
3. The conceptual plans submitted showed a tight curve radius south of the bridge.
Provide as large a radius as possible--superelevate the curve to help increase the
design speed.
4 Use a 5 foot wide sidewalk and 8 foot wide parkway width per the Collector street
standards.
5. Provide design for the construction of off -site street improvements on Fossil Creek
Parkway between the development and Colleg Avenue. According to the city's
Transitional Land Use Regulations and the Intergovernmental Agreement for the
Fort Collins Urban Growth Area, this developer is required to design and construct
off -site street improvements in order to mitigate the impacts from this development
(See attached copies of the documents). The condition of the existing street is not
adequate to carry the additional traffic generated by this development. The off -site
improvements should meet collector street standards in accordance with the
Larimer County Urban Growth Area Street Standards. The developer may enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the City to collect reimbursement in
accordance with Section 29-678 of the Transitional Land Use Regulations.
We understand that completing the missing link in Fossil Creek Parkway will
attract more trips than just those caused by this project. However, the City has
only limited funds that could be applied to the upgrading of the off -site Fossil
Creek Parkway, Larimer County has none and the adjoining neighborhood cannot
be expected to participate. The City has the means to use Street Oversizing funds
to pay for the oversized portion of permanent improvements (20 year design life
pavement) for the off -site street. However, the City cannot commit to the use of
(Continued on Page 3)
2
`W
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 12,1999 DEPT: P.�d�tii
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7th Filing
All comments must be received by Marc Virata no later than:
December 3, 1999
❑ No Comment
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Date: 2-3 4Signature:
Please send copies
of marked revisions
_Plat _Site
_Utility _Landscape � NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
City of FFort Collins
%W
REVISION
191 COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 12,1999 DEPT: S/02.* WA TF/z
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7th Filing
All comments must be received by Marc Virata no later than:
December 3, 1999
❑ No Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
1. Please provide a note on the storm sewer profiles that all storm sewers should be
inspected by the City of Fort Collins.
RESPONSE:
2. Please provide storm sewer calculations and profile views of the proposed pipes along
Mail Creek Lane. Also, if curb and gutter will be installed along Mail Creek Lane,
please show the locations of any necessary stormwater improvements (i.e., inlets,
etc.) and provide the necessary calculations (i.e., flows coming to the inlets, etc.). In
addition, please provide drainage easements for these facilities if they are out of the
right-of-way. If easements already exist, please show them on the plans.
RESPONSE:
(over)
Date: Z 'J Signature:
Please send copies cc: Ui Ya�L
of marked revisions
Plat L17site r
-�QUtility �QLandscape � NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS ^I.EMLW.Z�021
City of Fort Collins
It is a concern that the proposed grading around the pedestrian crossing of Mail Creek
may cause erosion problems around the bank cuts and potentially upstream and
downstream of the crossing. Please address bank stability of the channel based on the
proposed alignment of the crossing. Also, please provide a detail of the breakaway
bridge in the plans for this crossing.
RESPONSE:
4. Please provide details (with dimensions) for the cut-off walls that will be placed in
swale N-N.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
Your report states that it is recommended the areas where pipes are to be stubbed in
Mail and Fossil Creeks be reseeded and mulched immediately upon completion, etc.
It further states that blankets, etc. will be considered if the seed doesn't grow. Please
place a note on the plan to this effect. If the final slopes are going to be steeper than 4
to 1, the erosion control blankets should be placed immediately over seeded subgrade.
RESPONSE:
2. The erosion control plan and parts of the report include the construction of Fossil
Creek Parkway. If this installation is to be submitted and approved as a separate plan,
there at least should be a note on the plan (and the other) indicating that there are
separate plans, and erosion/sediment control should be made individual to each plan,
not sometimes combined, sometimes not. This particularly applies to the crossing of
Fossil Creek.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the redline plans and report for additional review comments.
HuntHills7th-4.doc
V
Citv of Fort Collins
Current Planning
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 12, 1999 DEPT: Natural Resources
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Parkway Extension
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
❑ No Problems
)91 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
5�ow R odd-pi1 °i
Po Azts .
Date:��/9 1 Signature:/
PLEASE SEND COPIES ❑ PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ NO
-,W UTILITY
0 LANDSCAPE
MYLARS
0=1
M
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 12, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 71h Filing
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
❑ No Problems
4 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Utility Plans
• Provide a cross slope of 2% along the sidewalk on the bridge over Fossil Creek.
• Note on the utility plan that the driveway entrance to the development needs concrete
improvements to the property line. Provide a detail of this driveway and how the sidewalk
meets the driveway (is this detail on sheet 13 of 17 for the development or is the construction
of the driveway part of the Fossil Creek Parkway Extension plans?)
• The plans should show the limits of construction proposed between the Fossil Creek Parkway
Extension and the Huntington Hills 7 h Filing Utility Plans with regards to Fossil Creek
Parkway right-of-way.
• Issues regarding the Mail Creek Lane design as well as the pedestrian bridge over Mail Creek
Lane will have to be resolved prior to approval.
• Offsite easements are required of this development.
• In order to ascertain necessary easement procurements, please provide an overall context
map/diagram illustrating the current ownership of land where public improvements will be
made and where the boundaries between different land owners are (i.e., for Mail Creek Lane,
for Fossil Creek Parkway south of the development.)
Plat
• Update the Plat Language as enclosed.
Date: Signature -
PLEASE SE_KD 60PIES PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ SITE [] NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
® UTILITY
0 LANDSCAPE
%W
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 12,1999 DEPT: /Y4/V,//461J , ,4Fr 416
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7"' Filing
All comments must be received by Marc Virata no later than:
December 3, 1999
❑ No Comment
'('Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
AL L a F % / �,.6�/ oc�M �•� 7— 5 <7 /C rU�dT l
d� Al
/itt�s7 f—IAic� TC�cu2ofVC? /�tJT'v ��i=��p7iaJ
{v64�j 6 h ?l-) l S �� 4
�S l o ss lc> C/2C�c�rC ��� kcU� �DL: 0 IC-.y 7—aO ��-'F7W4Zw
T14IJ a-+-r c 4tv-r/NC� Ta,/ d, L 1, S G L" R Ls,*5
Sl-Ivw 77+3 aC CO 2rO J N4r 1i'jr v otiJ T/4_4 - 141 2T/a n/
6r ass/�L (,/ZG& k ?0,4&-w47 7/-{A_r Sr-vwj aN 'TNi1
fQ , W (4ffrz-ct 7-14u7 778"
Tb z? o14 E I//Z 6 JJ 7-/4, s P r4T — IAJ f- ,+7- /"BIZ (- %age_
I-IL.s,4V, G/h1cTS 7
Date: Signature:
Please send copies
of marked revisions
}IdA Nr L.7
/Plat _Site
_Utility _Landscape ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
City of Fort Collins
%W
.t/
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 12,1999 DEPT :72Q�rsPo�z
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7"' Filing
All comments must be received by Marc Virata no later than:
December 3,1999
❑ No Comment
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
amd
Date: Signature:
Please send copies
of marked revisions
Plat ate
�Htility !.)landscape ❑ NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
City of Fort Collins
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 15 1999 DEPT:
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Meadows -Fossil Creek Parkway Impts.
All comments must be received by Marc Virata by:
December 6, 1999
Lf No Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Date:
Please send copies
of marked revisions
Signature
_ _Site Q
tility _Landscape NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
City of Fort Collins
19
F5
in
IMF IMF
PROJECT
rWff^C20q1 COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: Nov. 15, 1999 TO: Traffic Operations
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Meadows- Fossil Creek Parkway Impts.
All comments must be received by Marc Virata no later than the staff review
meeting:
Dec. 6, 1999
➢ Pull medians back 20 feet from the intersecting flowline.
➢ Shape the west end of the median just east of the business access drive near College Ave. to
improve left turn movement from the business access.
➢ Need to include bike stencils and signage, and appropriate traffic signage on the S & S plan.
➢ The crosswalk at Mail Creek Lane should be a painted or enhanced crosswalk. Raised are for
mid -block locations.
➢ Left turn bay striping should be 8" white tape.
Date: 12/08/99 Signature Ward Stanford
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
x Plat x Site Drainage Report _ Other
x Utility x Redlines x Landscape
`d
REVISION
III COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 15,1999 DEPT:Tf��a2t2
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Meadows -Fossil Creek Parkway Impts.
All comments must be received by Marc Virata by:
December 6,1999
❑ No Comment
PProblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Improvements from College Avenue to Mail Creek Lane
1. Although the water quality structures provided were initially requested, please
remove them and provide direct outfalls to Fossil Creek.
RESPONSE:
2. Please provide a floodplain use permit for the work within the floodplain.
RESPONSE:
3. Please provide riprap for the embankment adjacent to the bend in Fossil Creek just
east of Fossil Ridge Drive to protect the road in this location. Please bury this riprap
to preserve the aesthetics of this natural area.
RESPONSE:
Date: Signature:
Please send copies CC; Q YC V ✓�
of marked revisions 7ST-1 nC,
Plat Site
Utility cLLandscape NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
City of Fo C
0
0
M
Huntington Hills, 7' Filing - Preliminary - PUD -LDGS December 14, 1999
these funds until it is known that the street oversizing portion of the improvements
can be constructed permanently along with other improvements that the developer
constructs.
The developer must do a preliminary design for the ultimate improvements for off -
site Fossil Creek Parkway and develop an estimate. We will review the design and
estimate to determine whether the City has any means to participate.
According to our street standards the developer is required to provide a
preliminary design for Fossil Creek Parkway (a collector street) for 500 feet
beyond the development limits. The City is willing to participate in the
preliminary design costs, beyond 500 feet, for the permanent improvement of
Fossil Creek Parkway. The design shall include profiles and cross sections for the
permanent improvement.
Other Comments
6. Provide a cross section of the entrance to the development with 20 feet curb to
curb on both sides of the median.
7. Label the fire lane in the loop in front of Building 7.
Provide a soils report. The soils report submitted for this project is not for this
development. Submit a report for the land area of this development and for the
taller buildings not covered in the submitted report.
9. The development has drives that exceed 660 feet in deadend length. The buildings
will have to be sprinkled or other access provided to meet emergency access
requirements.
4. Please label the existing contours on the grading plan to denote flow patterns and
grading tie-ins. Be sure that any off -site flows are considered.
RESPONSE:
5. Please provide easements for all stormwater facilities and grading that occurs outside
of the right-of-way.
RESPONSE:
6. Please provide cross -sections that show the roadside swales along Fossil Creek
Parkway will have adequate capacity with freeboard or at least match the existing
roadside Swale configuration.
RESPONSE:
7. Please include the alignment of the storm sewer just west of Fossil Ridge Drive that
was approved with the Fort Collins/Loveland Water District project.
• RESPONSE:
8. Please include a note on the storm sewer profile sheet that all storm sewers should be
inspected by the City of Fort Collins. Also, please provide concrete encasements
around all the storm sewers that cross over water mains per section 5.3.4 of the
SDDC. In addition, please provide pressure seals around all storm sewer joints that
will be under pressure flow and denote this on the plans.
RESPONSE:
9. Please be sure that the raised crosswalk near the intersection of Mail Creek Lane will
not impede flow, since Fossil Creek Parkway is on -grade at this location. Please
provide details that show how the flows will pass through this location.
RESPONSE:
Extension from Mail Creek Lane to Fossil Creek Bridge
1. Comment #1 from the previous comments asked for discussion concerning why a
variance should be granted for constructing the bridge within the erosion buffer
HuntHills7th-4a.doc
%W
limits. Although the response letter documents this variance request, please include
that discussion in the text of the report (both the ACE and TST reports).
RESPONSE:
Please add a note to section A -A of sheet 4 of 8 stating the "existing creek bank shall
not be disturbed during construction of the trench".
RESPONSE:
3. The erosion buffer limit line shown in the legend for the corrected effective and the
proposed condition floodplain maps does not match the line for the erosion buffer
limits on the plans. Please correct this line on the legend.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
Will the Fossil Creek Parkway road improvements from College Avenue to Mail
Creek Lane be separate from the extension from Mail Creek Lane to the Fossil Creek
Bridge? If these installations are to be submitted and approved as separately, there at
least should be a note on both plans indicating that there are separate plans, and
erosion/sediment control should be made individual to each plan, not sometimes
combined, sometimes not. This particularly applies to the crossing of Fossil Creek.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the redline report and plans for additional review comments.
HuntHills7th-4a.doc
r./
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 15,1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Meadows -Fossil Creek Parkway
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
❑ No Problems
j2�PFroblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Provide street intersection details in order to establish how drainage and rideability is
addressed at all intersections (see Standard Drawing D-18).
Provide a detail of the raised crosswalk at Mail Creek Lane.
Is a pan proposed across Fossil Ridge Drive on the north side of Fossil Creek Parkway? The
signing and striping plan seems to indicate this.
Date: 2 Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES ❑ PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
El', UTILITY
0 LANDSCAPE
`.
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 15,1999 DEPT: S;xEE ;- z,2- c
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Meadows -Fossil Creek Parkway Impts.
All comments must be received by Marc Virata by:
December 6,1999
❑ No Comment
® Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
1-71-�i e� GorvLY✓� S
Date: Is IJ Signature:
Please send copies
of marked revisions
Plat _Site
j�tility _Landscape ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
City ofCity F��
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 15, 1999 DEPT: F,, mmA _5
PROJECT: Fossil Creek Meadows -Fossil Creek Parkway Impts.
All comments must be received by Marc Virata by:
December 6,1999
�No Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Date: // — 2 5 Sienature:
Please send copies
of marked revisions
_Plat _Site
_Utility _Landscape ❑ NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS
City of Fort Collins
4
19
`d
,to
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: December 2, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7th Filing
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
Please be aware that the Engineering Department considers the utility plan resubmittal
(submitted in November) incomplete. Other Departments have been notified that this utility
plan set needs to be resubmitted. The submittal is incomplete due to the omission of curb &
gutter along the east side of Mail Creek Lane, (as was shown on the previous submittal and given
final approval for at Planning and Zoning.) Recording of documents cannot occur and no
permits will be issued for any work related to this development without inclusion of the design
for curb and gutter on the east side of Mail Creek Lane.
As a reminder, this issue was discussed on several occasions and written responses from the City
have been directed to various parties. The City has received no formal response from the
Developer(s) with regards to these letters and has no intention of reconsidering its stance. On
September 10, a letter from the City Engineer in response to Mr. John Knapp stated the
following:
.. it has always been the City's position that completed improvements must be done on
the east side — curb and gutter and sidewalk. Ted Shepard has verified this. A 10'
sidewalk without curb becomes basically a concrete bike trail. The neighborhood
meeting minutes back on February 3, 1999 notes the curb and gutter requirement. As
such, I do not see this as an issue. "
In addition, on October 28, a letter from the City Engineer directed towards the Huntington Hills
7s' Filing and Miramont Valley projects noted the responsibilities as follows:
Date: /g4Ar�G% Signature:��
To: TST Engineering
Cc: Andover Development Group
Marc Palkowitsh
Cam McNair
Ted Shepard
*00
"Andover has agreed to upgrade the road surface to a 20 year design life from the
southern boundary of the Werner School to the intersection with Fossil Creek Parkway.
In turn, Bill Neal and Gary Nordic have agreed to fund the construction of 10 foot of
sidewalk and curb & gutter on the east side of Mail Creek Lane for the length that the
roadway fronts Miramont Valley (approximately 300 feet in length.) Andover Group will
be responsible for the remainder portion of sidewalk and curb and gutter, south of
Miramont's property to Fossil Creek Parkway. "
Please also note that an exhibit sheet showing all off site easements and who the respective
property owners are, was not received with this submittal (the plat does not suffice, as it does not
show easements offsite with relation to Mail Creek Lane.) Pedestrian bridge details (abutments,
elevations, etc.) were also not provided and are required with this submittal.
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7" Filing Engineering — Development Review Page 2 of 2
Citv of Fort Collins
Commutes Planning and Environmental �Jvices repyc etl peps.
Natural Resources Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: Marc Virata, City Engineer
FROM: Kim Kreimeyer, Environmental Planner 4:�.
DATE: December 9, 1999
RE: Huntington Hill 7`h Filing, Pedestrian Bridge
These comments are in response to the revisions dated October 1999. These plans show
that the pedestrian bridge crossing Mail Creek has been reduced from eighty (80) feet to
thirty (30) feet. Natural Resources has not been involved in any conversations about
changing the length of the bridge and is not in support of this change. As the owners of
the property, we are also not in support of the devastation to the natural area that the
recent plan reflects would occur to accommodate the thirty (30) foot bridge. A previous
correspondence, dated September 10,1999, between John Knapp and Cam McNair,
indicates that the basis of this change was under the premises of spanning the floodway.
Natural Resources has always stated the pedestrian bridge will need to span Mail Creek
from top of bank to top of bank. This distance is approximately eighty (80) feet. Natural
Resources is open to alternative locations, where the span of the pedestrian bridge
potentially would be less than eighty (80) feet. Please feel free to contact me at 221-6641,
with any questions, or to schedule a meeting to discuss this issue.
281 N. College Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6600 • FAX (970) 224-6177
104r
0
Kathleen,
Here are my thoughts on the Huntington Hills 7s' and Fossil Creek Parkway extension
projects. I haven't really looked at the Fossil Creek PW project before, so I didn't have
too many comments. Let's combine our final comments to Marc and submit as one?
MJ
Huntington Hills 7t6 #11-815
• Sheet 11: Why are local trail connections to the Parks Trail only 5'? They will be
shared bike/pedestrian connections. They should be 8'. At very minimum could live
with 6'. (LUC 3.2.2, C. Lb)
• Sheet 4: RE: "Offsite sidewalk to be constructed by others". Did this issue finally get 4-
resolved between the two developers? a IbVAL{- 1j ye; brPdgc eve& Je%rl (, ILk-�PtQbJ
• Sheet 4: Internal development sidewalk system still showing only 4'. 1" round
comments noted that we preferred 4.5' minimum as per Pedestrian LOS Manual.
• Sheet 6: Still showing only 4' attached sidewalk from Fossil Creek PW entrance to
site. I`- . _ .
• Sheet 10: Mail Creek Lane improvements (e.g. 10' trail detached) look OK.
W��Y�WM1 4'S AN" Ail" Ro-w�a � C� dif�cl..,i9 A- �Rt..
Fossil Creeek x e "
• Sheet 5: Q? Why do the bike lanes transition from 8' to 6' near the Huntington Hills
7" entrance? St Yt4ttok-Vl GtAL V. A450. r%Udl -b 4U44AJ {r" LI0- V-
SI WW is W1M�1l''YY'��f
NVJ M4 V� caked YMM& W VCR @ MNI (/a-
HH 7thRound2.doc 1 12/02/99
APR-27-00 THU 04:13 PM TRANSPORTATION SVCS. FAX NO. 221 8239
%W `400
P. 01
DATE: March 21, 2000 DEPT:
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7' Ff1ing + offsite improvements
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000
❑ NSOoblems
problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
�-y %P;t F-6"4� CUZA— 61�
(�q, CZ� "WA
4— "1Al� h4l VAi Cat? OW 0c
Q 0 2-lq(YA ► '
WWI CVLk lL4Aa—
*� and PQ/bt2ee. �
PPJ6waz,.iwv L yµpL�R M1, Ur
0 OA �z
Date; signature
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
13 Plat 13 Site 13 Utility 0 Landwape 0 Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS_STJBNaT MYLARS
M
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: November 12, 1998 TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT: #11-81R Huntington Hills, 7th Filing -
Preliminary - P.U.D. - LDGS
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
December 9, 1998
This preliminary soils report was done prior to the new standards and will need to updated with
the information now required. A final soils report and a pavement design report will need to be
submitted after site grading.
Date:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
pig _ Site _ IkaiW Report _ Ofller
_ Utility _ Rd= U01l — landscape
qIt:
dl
City of Fort Collins
REVISIO.
SHEE
DATE: March 21, 2000 DEPT: 5zwce, c�k "
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7m Filing + offsite improver•
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by. April 12, 2000
O No Problems
IRProblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
:.y .
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: March 21, 2000 DEPT: PR,L5
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7'' Filing + offsite improvements
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000
$(No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Date: i— Z &W Signature: �--�r,
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
0 Plat 13 Site 0 Utility 13 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 13 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
\✓
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
Jt 14- %-UatIy M
DATE: March 21, 2000 DEPT.-/%
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7th Filing + offsite improvements
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concems (see below or attached)
I. 6CtL"11k'7 d1vv�. �Lli'SStv1q cnT S,LL1. Cc^sa Er
I
Z . L.CGA L Ct o5ES, 3oa4r>A-kV IS t el ev--n
Date: Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
0 Plat 0 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
�w
DATE: March 21, 2000
COMMENT SHEET
DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7th Filing + offsite improvements
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000
❑ No Problems
m Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
1. Offsite easements are required prior to submittal of mylars.
2. The driveway immediately northeast of College Avenue along Fossil Creek Parkway appears to be carrying
drainage from College Avenue, is this intended? It appears there may be issues regarding flows entering this
driveway. Provide more detail of roadway grades where the improvements end to see where the water will go
— will the flows just enter open space east of the driveway? How much flow is potentially being dumped out at
this location off of College Avenue? Where is the nearest inlet along College Avenue? In general, it appears
that the other driveways are not impacted as much by the use of inlets upstream.
3. The handrail noted on the sidewalk along Mail Creek Lane is not the responsibility of the City. As the
commitment was made to add the sidewalk by the developer, the costs for all elements of the sidewalk design
necessary to create a safe design are the developer's responsibility.
4. Provide a cross-section (typical) of the Mail Creek Lane roadway with the attached sidewalk at the steepest
point where the handrail is shown.
5. Add the following note to the General Notes for the Fossil Creek Parkway Extension plans: After
construction of all bridge structures, the developer is required to provide to the City a bridge rating
form and documentation in accordance with federal bridge inspection criteria.
6. On Sheet 6 of the Fossil Creek Parkway Extension, is the intent of the two different options is for a decision
being made on one of the options prior to approval? Does a note need to be provided regarding which of the
two options will be used and why?
7. Add Natural Resources to the Utility signature block approval.
8. The bike/pedestrian design across Mail Creek Lane crosses into Miramont Valley P.U.D. easement, this
easement is not dedicated as an access easement. It appears that the Miramont Valley H.O.A. would have to
sign off on an easement for this location. Can this be relocated outside of the Mimmont Valley property?
9. The grading that appears off -site east of building 8, is this in an easement? The plat notes this as City owned
land though the procurement of off -site easements for this land isn't clear.
10. See the enclosed regarding development submittals in the County. A submittal to the County may be required,
please inform me of what decision the County may have regarding this project.
11. The Fossil Creek Meadows Drainage Study appears to have a missing word or phrase at the end of page 5 — the
sentence does not tie into the continuation on page 9.
12. It appears based upon the comments received that the project may be ready for mylars (provided all comments
have been addressed. However, offshe easements are required to be recorded prior to signature of any mylars.
Date: V / v �a Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISION
0 Plat 0 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: March 21, 2000 DEPT: c�
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7t' Filing + offsite improvements
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000
❑ No Problems
Problems 4g2Concerns ee below or attached)
of -I rt aM s
a L oy�v�yp, vko+, p.r 5 5 -Y�L�PrYrivtq
J
5Wc� 62, Ap42- YA LdTtic2.fovvv 11n2v Gn�DYP� �OYtG/^[ e
pl a,a,5 t- Atwi — 5e.ws
avv` b r t tID"
� o r t w1ti v� b �16 eLAd D 11
Crate: 4//-3 Signature:
l � J, -10 t� , ✓C�0
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: March 21, 2000 DEPT: 5roita.w4rE?
PROJECT: Huntington Hills 7th Filing + offsite improvements
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: April 12, 2000
❑ No Problems
,M Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
On -site Drainage Report and Plans
1. Please provide a detail of the breakaway pedestrian bridge that will be provided over
Mail Creek.
RESPONSE:
Since there were no comments on the drainage report, it was not returned. Please
submit two additional signed and stamped copies of the drainage report with the
mylar submittal.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
1. Please place a note on the plan indicating that there is a separate erosion/sediment control
report and plan for the construction of Fossil Creek Parkway.
RESPONSE:
2. The plan for the subdivision is OK, THE ONE FOR THE PARKWAY IS NOT OK.
Date: _�'Ll (5 Signature: -�-�, f
PLEASE SEND PIES OF MARKED REVISIONS r
0 Plat 0 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
Fossil Creek Parkway Extension
Please provide 4:1 slopes on both sides of the street at the north and south ends of the
extension (see sheet 4). Slopes up to 3:1 are allowed with bank stabilization provided
(e.g., erosion control fabric) and a variance request in the report. Slopes steeper than
3:1 wiIl not be accepted, like that shown on the south end of the extension.
RESPONSE:
Please show existing elevation contours in the north area of the extension plans and
make sure that the proposed contours tie-in with the existing.
RESPONSE:
The proposed retaining walls around the bridge are up to 10-feet high in some places.
These walls may have certain structural and railing requirements. Please contact the
City Building Inspection Department for further guidance.
RESPONSE:
4. There were no comments on either the TST drainage report or the ACE hydraulic
analysis and floodplain report. However, these reports are being returned so the ACE
report can be bound and any minor changes can be switched easily. Please submit
three bound, signed, and stamped copies of both reports with the mylar submittal.
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
The crossing of Fossil Creek with a bridge and attendant water/sewer, etc. utilities
should be addressed thoroughly in a well thought-out sediment/erosion control plan.
This should probably include rerouting (pumping) Fossil Creek flows around the
construction area until it has been stabilized. The currently submitted plan does not
address this critical area in sufficient detail. Please rethink and resubmit the plan in a
complete, stand-alone form.
RESPONSE:
2. The S amounts for reseeding/mulching in the escrow cost estimate are incorrect.
RESPONSE:
HuntHills7th-5.doc
Fossil Creek Parkway Improvements
1. Please align the storm sewer outlets in the direction of flow of Fossil Creek. Also,
please pull back the outlets slightly from the banks so the flared -end section will not
be located within the channel.
RESPONSE:
2. The cross-section of the parkway (sheet 7) shows slopes of 2.5:1 in the swale along
the north side. This exceeds the 4:1 criteria in open channels per section 7.2 of the
SDDC. Slopes up to 3:1 can be allowed with a variance request in the report and
bank stabilization (e.g., erosion control fabric) along the banks. Slopes steeper than
3:1 will not be accepted. Please note that the existing swale should maintain its
current capacity. This means a compensatory swale may be needed.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
The crossing of Fossil Creek with a bridge and attendant water/sewer, etc. utilities
should be addressed thoroughly in a well thought-out sediment/erosion control plan.
This should probably include rerouting (pumping) Fossil Creek flows around the
construction area until it has been stabilized. The currently submitted plan does not
address this critical area in sufficient detail. Please rethink and resubmit the plan in a
complete, stand-alone form.
RESPONSE:
2. The S amounts for reseeding/mulching in the escrow cost estimate are incorrect.
Please refer to the redline plans and report for additional review comments.
HuntHills7th-5.doc
V40
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: June 20, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #11-81S Huntington Hills PUD, 71h Filing
Final LDGS
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: June 14, 1999
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
General Comments
Please note that the following needs to be submitted for the project and weren't received with
this final submittal:
➢ A design for Mail Creek Lane.
➢ A design for Fossil Creek Parkway north of this site to College Avenue.
➢ A design for the bicycle/pedestrian trail from this site north to the Miramont Valley
subdivision.
Site Plan
• The sidewalk at the entrance to the site should continue straight across and not move out to
the corners.
Plat
• The right-of-way dedication for Fossil Creek Parkway should coincide with the approved
utility plans. The immediate 10' jogs in right-of-way from 40' to 50' is not allowed.
• Add Notice of Other Documents.
• The 17.94' dimension labeled on the plat map at the northeast edge of the site should be
14.94'.
• An "Emergency Access Easement" should be shown and defined on the plat for the internal
roadway n two
Date: % / Signature:
PLEASES ND COPIES PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: Z3 SITE ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
® UTILITY
q LANDSCAPE
%W
n
Utility Plans
• The Utility Approval Block should add "Traffic Engineer" and replace "Director of
Engineering" with "City Engineer".
• Note the revisions on the plans to the General Notes.
• Add the following to General Note #5:
The finished patch shad blend in smoothly into the existing surface. All large
patches shall be paved with an asphalt lay -down machine. In streets where more
than one cut is made, an overlay of the entire street width, including the patched
area, may be required. The determination of need for a complete overlay shall be
made by The City Engineer at the time the cuts are made.
• Add the following to General Note #13:
Identifying the need for a permit, preparing the application, and paying for the
review and submittal fees necessary to secure this permit, will be the responsibility
of the contractor.
• Please provide a greater taper length for the transitions along Fossil Creek Parkway at the
north edge of the property heading southbound, MUTCD has guidelines on this design.
• Please provide more detail on the road design, the length and physical location of road
widths, transitioning, etc.
• The vertical curves do not provide enough length. We would like to see the vertical curves
north of the bridge increased. The vertical curve south of the bridge should be increased to
the greatest extent possible, (a variance should be submitted for vertical curves that do not
meet our minimum requirements.)
• The raised crosswalk on Fossil Creek Parkway should be moved north to the intersection of
Mail Creek Lane and Fossil Creek Parkway. Continue the sidewalk to that intersection to
allow the sidewalk, the planned trail, and crosswalk to tie into each other.
(see plans for any additional comments)
NOTICE OF OTHER DOCUMENTS
ALL PERSONS TAKE NOTICE THAT THE DEVELOPER AND/OR OWNER HAS
EXECUTED CERTAIN DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THIS DEVELOPMENT WHICH
CREATE CERTAIN RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THE
DEVELOPER AND/OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OF ALL OR PORTIONS OF THE
DEVELOPMENT SITE, MANY OF WHICH OBLIGATIONS CONSTITUTE PROMISES AND
COVENANTS WHICH RUN WITH THE LAND. THE SAID DOCUMENTS MAY INCLUDE,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, SITE AND LANDSCAPE
COVENANTS, FINAL SITE PLAN, FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND ARCHITECTURAL
ELEVATIONS, WHICH DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND SHOULD BE CLOSELY EXAMINED BY ALL PERSONS
INTERESTED IN PURCHASING ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE.
PROJECT o!2'011�19N[T
COMMENT SHE
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 20, 1999 TO: Trans. Planning
PROJECT: #11-81 S Huntington Hills PUD, 7`' Filing —Final
LDGS
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
i
Wednesday, July 14,1999
!/!n A f Y<
X Lf"?6I
GLF t Yl�j i w
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS l/11�k,/�
_Plat !_.Sife _Drainage Report _Other GiC y t 7�t 6 b Z C�t.r
_Utility _Redline Utility r�dscape City of For, Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
Current Plannine
DATE: June 20, 1999 TO: Mapping/Drafting
PROJECT: #11-81S Huntington Hills PUD, 7th Filing — Final
LDGS
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14,1999
l-mj u ,A,-S
-rH6
Flo Rrit U !-1 e or- 7-ttLr'
Jul W I%tl O F
StTCTLUsv
IZ
7
'FH(S I- LA r IJ0 - MA rc-al -r t4,s- LEA,+c- �f les C � aC GCoSc j i
T µem(r tS A TrPo Ohr ; Hm PLAr--t
Ti+t3- aFc-- Sly EA-S(Tm-NT A RouNo 7-t+u�- IDLAT-
k. CI L- D S -1-b S tAu" T" l't �— iZ F 5 C u i2 0 1 N C., I" Feu ( i��C-e"p`7"l uhl t'lu.)
NPLAT ,JL
vTkLZ- OF &-rl-ten tAauY✓!�r S�ir7sm�t �—
Date: Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
From: Craig Foreman
To: Marc Virata
Date: Tue, Jul 13, 1999 4:06 PM
Subject: Fossil Creek Parkway Extension
Marc: Comments on the utility drawings.
Sheet 2. Verify that 2% landings are designed into the grades of the bike path on both sides of the
bridge. Connections to the street from the trail should have an 8' wide curb cut so maintenance vehicles
can access the trail. The alignment of the trail west of the bridge should be field located. The alignment
shown on the drawing may change due to field conditions.
Sheet S3. Marc, the use of vertical rails instead of the parapet wall is more an engineering decision than
mine. I do know that people prefer an open view to the water.
Buried riprap is good next to the trail. The soil on top can be smoothed to allow for a level edge
near the trail.
Sheet S1. Looks like a 1 foot drop in 4 feet horizontal grade under the bridge by the bike path. This
should work for safety off the trail.
Sheet S2. The MSE Wall near the trail should be ok. A natural color of block would be best.
About all. Craig
Craig L. Foreman
Manager of Park Planning and Development
970-221-6618
cforeman@ci.fort-collins.co.us
CC: Craig Foreman