Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAMPUS WEST REDEVELOPMENT - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-01-30Collins Currant Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 28, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Anne Aspen #23-04B Campus West Theatre Redevelopment PDP — Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: low January 18, 2006 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference 5. IIII TL O I S [.15 t2c �.x, 7 H i s 11 r4 /2,--,0 .4 r No Problems I EiZR Si ` z S. q 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) NU% ^Lest; 149r,V6 in) ZeV,.) ,0-6l ' ZL'ESN67'�/7✓Iyf3'Cf/G[ !r<- -604Z,� ZCLY No- A-, prw-e)F i��yiw✓;�� �/I�oc� t'r /Y94rcH 77-4e- LeGIfC yv � C�rL (3oun.p�Qn--, /rru,v✓,r7L!n,�`1 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS at _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City ofof Fr' /Z (J 7-1r 7 y E,sT2 i,9n r � � '5 r 2,4N 7-&'9 U)1TN TH a � l � r? C &J CLJ/I -S Ty ��4.-try / GJ CC r 7,4 13 er-H C. iv,ii r,r: l.uld tts PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: December 28, 2005 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Anne Aspen #23-04B Campus West Theatre Redevelopment PDP — Type I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: January 18, 2006 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference a No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other_ _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet CitvofFortCollins Selected Departments Date: January 18, 2006 Prq[ect: CAMPUS WEST THEATRE REDEVELOPMENT PDP - TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 18, 2006 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Site Plan Number: 21 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Where will a customer of the proposed retail that arrives by bicycle park along W. Elizabeth St.? There needs to be some bicycle parking located along the W. Elizabeth frontage to serve the proposed retail uses. Number: 26 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] What is the proposed pedestrian route from either City Park or W. Elizabeth to Building C? It seems that a connecting walkway would be in order. If this cannot be achieved, there should at a minimum be a crossing treatment of drive aisle that clearly delineates where pedestrians can be expected to cross safely. I am particularly curious about the safety of peds crossing the ramp to the upper levels of the parking structure. Signature 1'lA..0& Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat -C Site Drainage Report Other = Utility = Redline Utility = Landscape Page I i "1 Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Date: January 18, 2006 Project: CAMPUS WEST THEATRE REDEVELOPMENT PDP - TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 18, 2006 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Mau= a+untaot: anern YYamnoTT Topic: General Number: 27 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Retaining walls/ seat walls may not encroach into the ROW without an encroachment permit. This includes the footings. Please provide construction details of the proposed walls, and add spot elevations of top and bottom of walls to the grading sheet. Engineering will look at this and let the applicant know its thoughts regarding the issuance of encroachment permits in this area. Number: 28 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Greater than 8% slope requires a variance request, even if the ramp will be heated. Who will maintain the heating equipment? Number: 29 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Need to show that the existing driveway off of Elizabeth Street aligns with the proposed drive and is of adequate width. If not it will need to be reconstructed. Number: 30 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] The driveway onto City Park Ave is to be built to City driveway standards - with directional ramps. Non directional are shown at this time. Number: 31 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] The parking setback distance from Elizabeth is not being met. Per the volumes in the parking lot and volumes on Elizabeth the setback is 100 feet. Number: 32 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] The storage building along the east property line is shown within the 5 foot easement. Buildings can not be placed within an easement. Is the easement needed in this location? If not maybe it can be vacated in this location. This could be done on the plat. � l Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat t - " Site Drainage Report Other y Utility l 'Redline Utility �, Landscape Page 1 3 Number: 33 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Need to dimension the sidewalk widths existing and proposed. Number: 34 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Sidewalk on City Park Ave doesn't meet minimum attached width requirement Attached sidewalks are to be a minimum of 6 feet in width — The minimum width that can be added to a sidewalk is 4 feet or the sidewalk will need to be rebuilt. With the elimination of driveways, the new driveway and any curb, gutter and/or sidewalk that maybe damaged it may make more sense to replace the walk rather than add to it. Number: 38 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Refer to redlines for additional comments. Number: 41 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Please check the layout design with Poudre Fire Authority. They may have issues with turning radius and with obstructions in the 30' wide easement. They also do not allow any parking within the emergency access easements — so if a 30 emergency access easement is needed there is a conflict with the parking stalls. Number: 42 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18106] Believe that the easement labeled as public access and utility should also be labeled as emergency access easement. Number: 44 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Add detail #1602 to the detail sheets. Number: 45 Created: 1/18/2006 (1118/06] Detail #1606(a) got stretched out somehow. Topic: Grading and Drainage Number: 35 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Please refer to Appendix E-6 of LCUASS or speak with JR in Technical Services regarding plan scanability. Suggest separating this sheet into 2 sheets (Grading Plan, and Drainage and Erosion Control Plan). There is too much going on for one sheet, and the plan is cluttered. Number: 36 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] It is difficult to distinguish between existing and proposed contours. Please adjust line types for more clarity. Number: 37 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Existing contours should be shown a minimum of 50' offsite to verify that you are tying in properly. Topic: overall utility plan Number: 39 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Add a legend to this sheet. Number: 40 Created: 1/18/2006 (1/18/061 One sanitary and one stormwater manhole are located outside of the utility easement. Not sure that this will be acceptable to the utilities. Page 2 Number: 43 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Please add our standard street cut note: "Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards." Topic: Plat Number: 47 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Label how existing ROW along Elizabeth was dedicated (reception number), or else clearly dimension it on this plat. Number: 50 Created: 1/18/2006 [1 /18/06]Per the improvements shown on the utility plans it appears that the area east of the utility, access, and emergency access easement along the eastern property line needs to be a utility and drainage easement. Number: 51 Created: 111812006 [1/18/061 The 30 foot utility and access easement also needs to be an emergency access easement. Number: 52 Created: 1/18/2006 11/18/061 Show and label all the adjacent properties- includes those to the north and west. Number: 53 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/061 Comments from Technical Services 1.13oundary and legal do not close. Chord bearing in boundary does not match legal. 2.The east and south sides of this plat are adjoined by Brazil 2004, not as shown. 3.Point of beginning does not match the legal. 4.Outer boundary monuments? 5.Title is wrong as this is a replat of portion of Lot 1 and 2 Brazil 2004. 6.There was a permanent utility, pedestrian, sidewalk easement that was granted with the West Elizabeth project in 2003, does this plat accommodate it? 7.How was City Park and West Elizabeth dedicated? Please show. Topic: Site Plan Number: 48 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Check the scale. As shown, parking spaces would be 25' deep. Number: 49 Created: 1/18/2006 [1/18/06] Remove the gray from the buildings, it will not scan well. Page 3 DATE: August 25, 2006 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Anne Aspen #23-04C CAMPUS WEST REDEVELOPMENT FINAL PLANS Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: September 13, 2006 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) r Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS —Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape a City of F� °�