Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMORNINGSIDE VILLAS - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-10-06PF REVISION .�COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 22, 1997 DEPT: Mapping PROJECT: #36-95 Great Dane - Type I (LUC) PDP PLANNER: Ted Shepard All comments roust be recieved no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 10, t997 Njuj'lq DercnmiNpo? L'NOU6f+ IN(-U2M�T�Oti Ta I7CIE�YhINC TF{l�• +2CGo�201�JC� INFO )-012 'i-It� OAF SITS= �/->rSEMFW Mu�l— T G S NoW c«,1r c ",41 Date: Signature: CHECK HERE lF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Pit _ Site _ kW Report _ Oier _ Utility _ Redlie Utility _ Landscape City of Fort Collins Current Plannint PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Building Permit Review DATE: December 23, 1999 DEPT: Mapping and Drafting PROJECT: Morningside Villas Subdivision and RM Site Plan Review, (formally Great Dane) NOTE: Building Permit Review (old use -by -right) The site, landscape and elevations are to be reviewed under the old RM Zoning Code PLANNER: Peter Barnes, Zoning ENGINEER: (Sheri Wamhoff All comments- must be received by: January 7, 2000 , i c l T le ) 6,q-w 7.1 c %'� 6J ,,'/y f a j Date: Signature: Check here if you wish to receive copies of revisions Plat Site — Drainage Report Other: Utility —Landscape — Redline Utility REVISION '40�COMMENT SHEET 1�® DATE: August 22, 1997 DEPT: Eh* PROJECT: #36-95 Great Dane - Type I (LUC) PDP PLANNER: Ted Shepard All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 10, 1997 Great Dane Subdivision September 10, 1997 1. There are no longer Minor Subdivisions so the Minor should be taken out of the title of the project and the plat. The name of the project will just be: Great Dane Subdivision 2. Need to label the drainage, access and utility easement on each lot on the plat to make it clear that they are on both lots. 3. Additional off -site easements are needed that are not shown on the plans. A construction easement on the north side of lot 1 for the construction of the retaining wall and a drainage easement for the stormwater pipe south of lot 2. 4. What is happening at the end of the street? Is the crown remaining in the street all the way to the driveway or is it being transitioned out? It is not clear on the plans - provide additional spot elevations as necessary and/or modify the basin boundaries accordingly. 5. An overlay from the manhole south will probably be required. 6. See plans for additional comments. 7 Discussing how to process the request to end the street without a cul-de-sac. We are looking at the code to determine as to whether it wilUcan be processed as a compliance review or if it will need to be a modification that is taken to the board. Date: Signature: - CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS x Pbt x Sit¢ _ Dcai p Mott _Oder- ^=�6=ffwn -7 UOV _ Red[= M _ City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannint DATE: isjlr - DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: PLANNER: - T � ENGINEER: ��Of ❑ No Problems L� Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Great Dane Plat • indicate that the off site sewer easement is by separate document utility Plans • A cross pan or lip is needed at the driveway to keep the flow out of the pedestrian crossing. • The street flow needs to go through a sidewalk chase into the parking area so that it does not flow across the pedestrians path • The sidewalk needs to go around the end of the street so that the ramps provide a crossing across the parking area driveway. • The curb at the end of the street needs to be a minimum 15 foot radius - as previously agreed. • The driveway into the parking area needs to be designed as a driveway cut. • If this is submitted under the new system (City Plan) than the ramps need to be in accordance with the new ramp standards. Date: Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE City of Fort Collins Current PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Building Permit Review DATE: August 1, 2000 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Morningside Villas Subdivision and RM Site Plan review, (formally Great Dane Sub) Note: Building Permit Review (old use -by -right) the site, landscape and elevations are to be reviewed under the old RM Zoning Code. PLANNER: Peter Barnes, Zoning ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff All comments must be received by: August 16, 2000 Morningside Villas Subdivision August 15, 2000 Plat Where is the off -site drainage easement in the process? Who is working on this, stormwater? Parks? TA i w ar 2 f,..,,.,�l.! 6 y Utility plans For the ramp on the east side of the driveway you are indicating that need to use vertical curb. That is great, I think the not( should read: "vertical curb & gutter taper curb from 1 /2"to 5"" instead of V' vertical curb & gutter taper curb from 6" to 5"". Since the curb height will be 1/2" at the driveway and 5" high at the beginning of the ramp. This is shown on several sheets, so the change needs to be made on all of them. Would also recommend a note: "vertical curb and gutter taper curb from 6" to 5"" for the piece between the curb chase and the existing curb. �L! e ✓..,-1 - t .,� n,. e Date: �� Signature;, Check ere if you wis to receive copies of revisions Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other: Utility _ Landscape _ Redline Utility PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Building Permit Review Current Planning DATE: August 1, 2000 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Morningside Villas Subdivision and RM Site Plan review, (formally Great Dane Sub) Note: Building Permit Review (old use -by -right) the site, landscape and elevations are to be reviewed under the old RM Zoning Code. PLANNER: Peter Barnes, Zoning ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff All comments must be received by: August l6, 2000 Morningside Villas Subdivision August 15, 2000 Plat Where is the off -site drainage easement in the process? Who is working on this, stormwater? Parks? Utility plans For the ramp on the east side of the driveway you are indicating that need to use vertical curb. That is great, I think the no should read: "vertical curb & gutter taper curb from 1 /2"to 5"" instead of "6" vertical curb & gutter taper curb from 6" to 5"". Since the curb height will be 1 /2" at the driveway and 5" high at the beginning of the ramp. This is shown on several sheets, so the change needs to be made on all of them. Would also recommend a note: "vertical curb and gutter taper curb from 6" to 5"" for the piece between the curb chase and the existing curb. Date: �� Signature; , Check ere if you wish to receive copies of revisions _ Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other: Utility _ Landscape _ Redline Utility City of Fort Collins Current PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Building Permit Review DATE: May 16, 2000 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: MorningsideVillas Subdivision and RM Site Plan review, (formally Great Dane Sub) Note: Building Permit Review (old use -by -right) the site, landscape and elevations are to reviewed under to the old RM 'Zoning Code. PLANNER: Peter Barnes, Zoning ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff All comments must be received by: June 6, 2000 Morningside Villas Subdivision June 9, 2000 Landscape Plan Why not concrete the southwest corner of the street behind the radius where you have indicated gravel. It will be less maintenance and look better the only thinkg that will need to be done is to make sure that this area can transition down to the ramp correctly. Thanks for a copy of the sewer easement. Where is the off -site drainage easement in the process? Replace the attorney certification paragraph with the current version. Utility plans I. If drainage is going to come off of the street on only one side (east side) a min 15 foot radius needs to be provided at the end of the improvements. This will allow the street to be cleaned by a street sweeper. This was discussed several rounds of review ago. This 15-foot radius needs to be provided the driveway access needs to be narrowed if this can not be accommodated with a 24-foot access. For the number of vehicles using this parking area a 20-foot access drive is adequate. 2. Use a taper versus a blunt tie in to tie in the new wider sidewalk to the existing sidewalk. 3. The standard driveway detail shows a 6-foot transition for the sidewalk ramp. There is only 5 feet on the east side. Will the transition in 5 feet meet ADA requirements? — you have a note here to taper curb from 6" to 5". I am a little confused. 1 think I understand what you are trying to do, but where you have the not is where the curb would be transitioning from 0" to 6". 1 think what you were looking at was that the curb would transition from the existing curb at 6" to 5" and then the ramp would transition from 5" to 0". Not sure how you are going to transition from the existing 6" curb to 5" in the space allowed. But it may work Is there enough clearance and volume in the culvert if it only has a 5" opening? 4. Per the standard detail the drive is to rise a min of 'A inch per foot. This is not what is being shown by the elevations on the plan. Provide a section to show how this works and that the drainage does not sheet flow into the driveway or add the notes to the existing detail. You say this is no different than a driveway draining on to the street. Well that is not allowed. That is not something we have never wanted and now it is in the land use code that you cannot drain concentrated flow across a sidewalk into the street. Therefore, need to provide the lip, but the drive can slope back into site. See notes to add to detail. Date: (`,-Ila) Signature:c Check ere if you wish to receive copies of revisions _ Plat _ Site Drainage Report _ Other: X" Utility Landscape )C Redline Utility City of Fort Collins Current Plannine PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Building Permit Review DATE: December 23, 1999 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Morningside Villas Subdivision and RM Site Plan Review, (formally Great Dane) NOTE: Building Permit Review (old use -by -right) The site, landscape and elevations are to be reviewed under the old RM Zoning Code PLANNER: Peter Barnes, Zoning ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff All comments must be received by: January 7, 2000 Morningside Villas Subdivision January 10, 2000 If drainage is going to come off of the street on only one side (east side) a min IS foot radius needs to be This will allow the street to be cleaned by a street sweeper. This provided at the end of the improvements. was discussed several rounds of review ago. -- � — iz Provide elevation at the centerline. of the road where the transition is to start. atjt' ==Label the driveway width. ly 5 feet on the The standard driveway detail shows a 6-foot transition for the sidewalk ramp. There is on east side. Will the transition in 5 feet meet ADA requirements' I don't think so. =�=_ t. fae—w f m= re iA`'p tl,�t. 4 i=A F`,;; Need to provide a section through the driveway. Per the standard detail the drive is to rise a min of/a inch per foot. This is not what is being shown by the elevations on the plan. The detail on sheet 6 references a section on sheet 4, but there is not one there. Provide a section to show how this works and that the drainage does not sheet flow into the driveway. F• ! - p. •�f - T ;' _ ]'he variance Tor us of the metal culvert is actually a stormwater Issue Pei my conversation with Donnie with the use of a metal sidewalk culvert and engineering will Dustin they do not seem to have a problem ' accept a metal sidewalk culvert in this situation. Date: /0 9 ` Signature: Check here if you wish to receive copies of revisions Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other: n(Utility XI-andscape _ Redline Utility REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: 5/25/1999 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-95 Morningside Villas (Great Dane Subdivision) PDP - Type 1 (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 No,Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) June 17, 1999 Morningside Villas (formally Great Dane Subdivision) f; Au r� r. No site plan or landscape plan was provided -please provide. - r E >'- Information sheet provided stated that there was now 10 parking spaces on site, the utility plans only show 81 ti parking spaces with 3 of those being in front of the garages (sohe technically Use n the requirement for acol-de-sac has In accordance with the provisions of Section 3.6.2 (B) been modified. In accordance with the code, a letter from Roger Frasco and a converstations with Joe Jaramillo indicated that no col -de -sac is needed provided the units/ buildings are fire sprinklered. Upon this recQmen anonon the City Engineer has determined that the cul-de-sac requirement can be waived for this project., r-f- r` "comment 2 on staff comments" what was comment 2, was this from the Information sheet provided responded to planners comments, or another entity? = °x " r Modify the general notes to reference the City Engineer and not the Director of Engineer. Use new City signature block rti'` 'file sidewalk chases for now going off the street thru the site need to be concrete chases andnotthe metal -d sidewalk chases. <: a c.- ; rs•. The min sidewalk width per standards is 4.5 feet. Adjust to show meeting the minimums. will need an easement for the installation of the Timber wall as will not be able to install without getting on the neighboring property. Indicate the maximum height of this wall. : ;r " -. a.' '` 4' `s E `' ` "' �,' 4, Need to work directly with the City department that owns the property that the easements are needed on. Easement dedication of City property has to go through City Council (ordinance - two readings). This will need to occur prior to the hearing for this project occurring. Add notice of other documents statement to the plat. Datbee plans for additional comments. `Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 'Plat ,Site _ Drainage Repoli _ Other utility Rwhe Utility 'landscape City of Fort Collins Current Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Building Permit Review DATE: December 23, 1999 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Morningside Villas Subdivision and RM Site Plan Review, (formally Great Dane) NOTE: Building Permit Review (old use -by -right) The site, landscape and elevations are to be reviewed under the old RM Zoning Code PLANNER: ]Peter Barnes, Zoning ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff All comments must be received by: January 7, 2000 Morningside Villas Subdivision January 10, 2000 If drainage is going; to come off of the street on only one side (east side) a min 15 foot radius needs to be provided at the end of the improvements. This will allow the street to be cleaned by a street sweeper. This was discussed several rounds of review ago. Provide elevation at the centerline of the road where the transition is to start. Label the driveway width. The standard driveway detail shows a 6-foot transition for the sidewalk ramp. There is only 5 feet on the east side. Will the transition in 5 feet meet ADA requirements? I don't think so. Need to provide a section through the driveway. Per the standard detail the drive is to rise a min of1A inch per foot. This is not what is being shown by the elevations on the plan. The detail on sheet 6 references a section on sheet A, but there is not one there. Provide a section to show how this works and that the drainage does not sheet flow into the driveway. the variance for use of the metal culvert is actually a stormwater issue. Per my conversation with Donnie with the use of metal sidewalk culvert and engineering will Dustin they do not seem to have a problem accept a metal sidewalk culvert in this situation. Date: <<; Signature,--.- �c; Check here if you wish to receive copies of revisions;, L.Plat Iy, site _ Drainage Report Other: _ Utility __,?,_ll,andscape — Redline Utility