The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUNSTONE MIXED USE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-07-19REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: October 25, 2001 TO: Engineering - Sheri PROJECT: #57-860 Sunstone PDP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Cameron Gloss no later than the staff review meeting: November 14, 2001 ff No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **.PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** Date: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF RETSIONS _ PW _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility Refine Utility — Landscape REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 16, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #56-870 Sunstone - PDP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Cameron Gloss in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: - June 13, 2001 **Please note that I have given this the full four week review like a new submittal due to its absence. EJNo Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) *PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** 2, 77c,4i Alps 1 //0 ZJED/cAr,o�j �T �-r�// 1�I�-F �42 77/-IL1217- is AJo L�7- �. I �cx size SA"1d )"e lct1r?er. S. Vt°cih �y mqp t_-010 �o/ TeFroluce. CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Darll�lility _ Redlinc Crility — Landscape _Signature:_ PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Callins Current Planning DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #r57-860 Sunstone PDP — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting;: M November 22, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference _ Z /GAT ✓f/�£ /N T��rr1L,�Tc�IENi OFo�^�EeSNiP /C/-i T>�E p- 13, T�Kr size line wei7k4s o, d oue�-ol1 �uaILI 0 �lqr m Lt5t b rC�PYn8LC-CL, . Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Pat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape r7-g"AIN AID . .h PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: October 25, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #57-860 Sunstone PDP — Type II (LUC) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by. - Wednesday, November 22, 2000 General Comments See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, plat, site and landscape plans. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Utility Plan Comments ♦ This was a very good first submittal! ♦ In general your lines need to be darker so that the utility plans can be scanned into the computer. Cover Sheet; Sheet I of 10: ♦ Please revise general notes as redlined. Overall Utility Plan; Sheet 2 of 10: ♦ Stoney Creek Drive has a new surface and will need a complete asphalt overlay. The general limits of the overlay should be shown on the utility plans. In addition, a penalty fee will be assessed. ♦ Please show the removal and reconstruction at the Stonegate Drive/ Timberline Road intersection. ♦ Add the following note to your note # 1: All streets cuts, curb & gutter and sidewalk removal, and the repair & reconstruction of the aforementioned shall be done in accordance with the city's "Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Standards and Guidelines". The city inspector and/ or the City Engineer shall have final authority in regard to the limits of the street repair. ♦ Provide directional access ramps at the Stonegate Drive/ Timberline Road intersection. ♦ Clearly indicate existing versus proposed conditions. Date: PLEASE SEND COPIES ❑ PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY Signature: 0 LANDSCAPE ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS ♦ In is my understanding from the Stormwater Utility that existing storm sewer adjacent to Timberline Road extends further north. How does the location of this storm sewer effect the placement of street trees along Timberline Road? Stonegate Drive Plan & Profile; Sheet 5 of 10: ♦ All cross pans should have a minimum slope of 0.6% (Street Design Manual Section 1.02.03.12e) ♦ The minimum cross slope from the lip of the median should be 2.0% (Street Design Manual Section 1.02.03.14b). Timherline Road Median Plan; Sheet 6 of 10: ♦ Please provide more detail on the cross sections and at 50-foot intervals (see redlines). ♦ The existing grades along the centerline should be shown for the median. ♦ Please verify that the signing and striping plan is acceptable to Traffic Operations. Street Details; Sheet10 of 10: ♦ Show a directional ramp detail. ♦ Show details D-15, D-17 and D-20. Site and Landscape Plan Comments: ♦ The parking stall setback for Stonegate Drive should be a minimum of 40 feet. ♦ Let's discuss a sidewalk connection through the detention pond. Also, provide a sidewalk connection along the private drive to the north. ♦ All internal sidewalks with parking stalls less than 19 feet should be a minimum of 6 feel in width. ♦ Please add a note to the landscape plan specifying the exact location of the street trees along Timberline Road. Also, see comment above about the storm sewer location and how that effects the street trees. Plat Comments: ♦ Include additional plat language (see attachment). PROJECT aCOMMENT SHEET city of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #_57-860 Sunstone PDP Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: November 22, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for fixture reference oCtr IGLt/ .Stynature CHECK I I1 RE IF Yol: wisi-i TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REViSMNS Plat Site DramaSe Report Other utility _. Redlire I-tility Landscape Citv of Pact Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: October 25, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: 457-860 Sunstone PDP — Type II (LUC) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments ,must be received by. - Wednesday, November 22, 2000 General Comments ♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility. plat, site and landscape plans. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Utilitv Plan Comments ♦ This was a very good first submittal! ♦ In general your lines need to be darker so that the utility plans can be scanned into the computer. Cover Sheet; Sheet l of 10: ♦ Please revise general notes as redlined. Overall Utility Plan; Sheet 2 of 10: ♦ Stoney Creek Drive has a new surface and will need a complete asphalt overlay. The general limits of the overlay should be shown on the utility plans. In addition, a penalty fee will be assessed. ♦ Please show the removal and reconstruction at the Stonegate Drive/ Timberline Road intersection. ♦ Add the following note to your note 91: All streets cuts, curb & gutter and sidewalk removal, and the repair & reconstruction of the aforementioned shall be done in accordance with the city's "Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Standards and Guidelines". The city inspector and/ or the City Engineer shall have Final authoriry in regard to the limits of the street repair. ♦ Provide directional access ramps at the Stonegate Drive/ Timberline Road intersection. ♦ Clearly indicate existing versus proposed conditions. / Date: Signature:�?�Pt{; _ PLEASE SEND COPIES El' PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS: C3'�SITE 0/'UTILITY ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS G' LANDSCAPE ♦ In is my understanding from the Stormwater Utility that existing storm sewer adjacent to Timberline Road extends further north. How does the location of this storm sewer effect the placement of street trees along Timberline Road? Stonegate Drive Plan & Profile; Sheet 5 of 10: ♦ All cross pans should have a minimum slope of 0.6% (Street Design Manual Section 1.02.03.12e) ♦ The minimum cross slope from the lip of the median should be 2.0% (Street Design Manual Section 1.02.03.14b). Timberline Road Median Plan; Sheet 6 of 10: ♦ Please provide more detail on the cross sections and at 50-foot intervals (see redlines). ♦ The existing grades along the centerline should be shown for the median. ♦ Please verify that the signing and striping plan is acceptable to Traffic Operations. Street Details; Sheet 10 of 10: ♦ Show a directional ramp detail. ♦ Show details D-15, D-17 and D-20. Site and Landscape Plan Comments: ♦ The parking stall setback for Stonegate Drive should be a minimum of 40 feet. ♦ Let's discuss a sidewalk connection through the detention pond. Also, provide a sidewalk connection along; the private drive to the north. ♦ All internal sidewalks with parking stalls less than 19 feet should be a minimum of 6 feet in width. ♦ Please add a note to the landscape plan specifying the exact location of the street trees along Timberline Road. Also. see comment above about the storm sewer location and how that effects the street trees. Plat Comments: ♦ Include additional plat language (see attachment). Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments C ily of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: October 8, 2001 Project: SUNSTONE PDP - TYPE II #57-860 All comments must be received by CAMERON GLOSS in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 10, 2001 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 67 Plat - need to identify who is to own and maintain Tract A. �63 utilty plans - need to identify the driveway widths and there location in reference to a property line on the plans. 74 Utility plan details - provide the high volume driveway detail from the new standards for the access point onto Timberline. Provide a section and make changes as shown. 80 See additional comments on the plans. 87 Plat - modify note 1 on the plat - there is only one tract and it is not an emergency access easement - that has been described separately. 88 Utility plans -sheet 2 You have modified the pavement repair/ replace limits on the Timberline access point. This needs to be changed so it once again shows some pavement patching. Add a note: See sheet 11 for utility plan phasing. 89 Utility plans - sheet 5 Now that you have provided elevations at the access point on Timberline these points do not produce x-slopes on Timberline that match or are close to the x-section slopes shown on the next page. The correct elevations need to be provided. 90 Utility plans - sheet 6 Add note # 1 from sheet 2 to this sheet. Signature i Due CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility �� Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 1, 2001 PROJECT: SUNSTONE PDP - TYPE II 457-860 All comments must be received by CAMERON GLOSS in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 01, 2001 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Dept: Engineering ilm Please show phasing on all sheets. Issue Contact: Katie Moore 19 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Overall Utility Plan: Please clearly show existing sidewalk, curb and gutter, etc vs. proposed. Also, provide a legend. (Repeat comment) Stoney Creek Drive will need a mill and inlay of 2" of asphalt, not an overlay. 20 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Grading Plan: Drainage is not allowed to flow over a public sidewalk from a private drive. Please add the notes to these driveway cuts: install driveway cut (typ) Please add the note to the mid -block ramp on Stoney Creek: install mid -block ramp (typ) Please see plan for additional comments. 1 of 4 21 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Stonegate Drive Plan and Profile: All of the driveways should be concrete to the property line. Please show the lip of median gutter elevation on the east side of the median on the plan view. Please show the edge of ROW on the profile views. Please see plan for additional comments 22 Issue Contact. Katie Moore Median Plan: Is the solid yellow/broken yellow striping ok with traffic? Please show the limits of the street cut on Timberline and add note 1 from sheet 2. On cross sections: Please revise the 1+00 cross section to reflect the new driveway grading. Median Profile: Please label 1+50 and 0+50 stations on the plan view. Please see plan for additional comments. 23 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Street Details: Please add the midblock ped. ramp detail (D-12.6) and a directional ramp detail for ramps at Timberline (D-12.7). Several other details no longer apply with the change to a private drive. 38 Issue Contact. Katie Moore Plat: A separate emergency access easement will need to be dedicated for PFA. 50 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff site plan - what are the building set backs for the single family lots? Need to indicate at a min. that there is a 20 foot setback from the property line to the garage. 51 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Site plan - on the multipfamily lot - need a min of 20 feet from the back of the sidewalk to the garage door/building. Don't have it on either driveway. 52 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff site plan - show the utility easements on the site and landscape plans 53 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff landscape plan - specify tree seperation from driveway requirements. 2 of 54 57 67 W .• 70 71 72 73 74 75 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Site, landscape and utility plans - need to show the driveway locations for the single family lots on the plans. Need to see if there are any conflicts with the utilities or the trees. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Show the phasing on the site and landscape plans as well as on all sheets of the utility plans. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Plat - need to identify who is to own and maintain Tract A. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utility plans - utility plans - Show existing infrastructure as dashed and new as solid dark lines so it is clear what is new and what is existing. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utilty plans - need to identify the driveway widths and there location in reference to a property line on the plans. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utility plans - grading plans - the driveway cuts will not have a low point in the center back as shown. The transition to the driveway cut should occur on the property and not within the concrete driveway cut. Issue Contact Sheri Wamhoff Utility plans - entry drive off of timberline - need to show that there is to be concrete to the property line. Provide some additional elevations. Remove all reference to Stonegate Drive from these plans. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Need to identify if the cross walks shown are to be painted or enhanced. Identify on both the site and utility plans. If thye are enhanced then provide a detail for construction of suchj on the utility plans. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utiltiy plan details - On the driveway approach detail show how the on -site curb will transition out at the property line. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utility plan details - provide the high volume driveway detail from the new standards for the access point onto Timberline. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utility plans - details - the midblock ramp - since the sidewalk is attached and the new sidewalk T's into this one at the point of the midblcok ramp a ramp similar to what i have drawn will need to be built. Provide this additional 3 of 76 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utility plan - phase 1 plan - the driveway and the waterline stub at the south end of the property should be put in with phase 1. Otherwise two street cut fees for this street will be charged and will have to repave this portion of the street again when Phase 2 is done. 77 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utiltiy plan - phase 1 plan - need to show the patch that is needed on Stoney Creek Drive and all notes associated with this on this sheet. 78 Issue Contact. Sheri Wamhoff utility plans - phase 1 plan - if you refuse to show phasing on the other plan sheets in the set, need to add a note to the plans that indicates that "Phase 2 is all work remaining not shown on this sheet." 79 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff utiltiy plans - phase 1 plan - are the fences to be built with phase 1? 80 Issue Contact Sheri Wamhoff See additional comments on the plans. 81 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 82 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Please return information for development agreement sheet filed out (attached) Signal a Date CHECK HERE IF YO W ISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS 'XPlat x Site Drainage Report _ Other -Utility XRedline Utility %Landscape 4 of Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Citvot Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: .Tune 15, 2001 PROJECT: SU YSTONE PDP -TYPE II #57-860 All comments must be received by RON FUCHS in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: June 13, 2001 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Dept: Engineering 16 Issue Contact Katie Moore iu- 19 Please darken background lines. They are not dark enough to be reproduced. Please show phasing on all sheets. Issue Contact: Katie Moore Issue Contact: Katie Moore Overall Utility Plan: Please clearly show existing sidewalk, curb and gutter, etc vs. proposed. Also, provide a legend. (Repeat comment) Please delineate limits of street cuts more clearly (see plans). Please verify if the curb along Stoney Creek Drive is vertical or driveover. Stoney Creek Drive will need a mill and overlay of 2" of asphalt, not an overlay. 1 of 3 20 21 22 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Grading Plan: Please darken background information so that it can be reproduced/read. Please provide additional spot elevations on the two driveway accesses to Stoney Creek and access to Caribou. Drainage is not allowed to flow over a public sidewalk from a private drive. Please add the notes to these driveway cuts: install driveway cut (typ) Please add the note to the mid -block ramp on Stoney Creek: install mid -block ramp (typ) Please see plan for additional comments. Please match with the site plan. Issue Contact: Katie Moore Stonegate Drive Plan and Profile: This street section is no longer public. It needs to be a private drive or private street. My comments address the private drive option. If you would like to make it a ;private street instead, I will provide comments for that option, also. Please show the existing grade flowline elevations on the plan view also. It would help to have the Plan and Profile views line up. All of the driveways should be concrete to the property line. Please show the lip of median gutter elevation on the east side of the median on the plan view. Please show the edge of ROW on the profile views. Please see plan for additional comments Issue Contact: Katie Moore Median Plan: How does the proposed striping tie in with the existing? Is the solid yellow/broken yellow striping ok with traffic? Please show the limits of the street cut on Timberline and add note 1 from sheet 2. On cross sections: Please revise the 1+00 cross section to reflect the new driveway grading. The sidewalks on stations 0+50 and 0+04 are shown as 7' on the plan view, not 10'. Which is correct? All of the sidewalks show horizontal shifting, but on the plan view show up as consistently lining up with the edge of ROW. Median Profile: Please show spot elevations on profile drawing. (repeat comment) Please label 1+50 and 0+50 stations on the plan view. Please see plan for additional comments. 2 of 23 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Street Details: Please add the midblock ped. ramp detail (D-12.6) and a directional ramp detail for ramps at Timberline (D-12.7). Several other details no longer apply with the change to a private drive. 38 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Plat: Please revise the plat language (see attached) and add the Private Drive Box. A separate emergency access easement will need to be dedicated for PFA. 39 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Site Plan: Regarding the curb cut to the detention pond, please match to the utility plans. Other items in the utility and site plans do not match; please see redlines for further comments. Notes labeling existing/proposed ROW and existing/proposed property lines conflict, please clarify which are correct. Please see redlines for additional comments. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility X Landscape 3 of