The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPRING CREEK CENTER PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-07-13DATE: 11/20/02 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Spring Creek Center Pud ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff ❑ No Problems ET 5rroblems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: Spring Creek Center PUD revisions November 20, 2002 • The revisions do not need to be noted on the cover sheet as there are no changes shown on this sheet. • Sheet 2 — need to bubble all the areas that have changed since the original plan approval. Need to adjust the information on the culverts under Midpoint Drive. The revision needs to be number 1 as it is the first revision on this sheet. • Sheet 3 — The revisions need to start at number 1 on each sheet and be numbered consecutively after that. It doesn't matter that the same change maybe another number on another sheet. • Sheet 4 —The first revision doesn't need to be noted since it was a brand new sheet that was signed and nothing was bubbled. Need to bubble everything that has changed and show the change at the intersection. • Sheet 5 —As with sheet 4 the first item listed doesn't need to be. Adjust the numbering. • Sheet 6 — adjust the numbering to start at 1 and go up from there. Need to make the changes to the information called out for the Midpoint Drive intersection and bubble all the changes made. • Sheet 7 — Missing the shading in Pond 3 that was originally shown. Need to adjust the numbering. • Sheet 9, 12 and '12a — Adjust the numbering. • Sheet 10 — Need to show the proposed changes to the intersection on all the views. Unable to check the design as we do not have turning templates for a 1" = 30' scale (do have 1 "=50' though). Need to include all the previous notes that were on the details. Adjust the numbering to start at 1. • Landscape plan -- Need to show al the utilities on the plan — main lines and services. Need to make sure that the landscaping is meeting the separation requirements. • Site Plan — the wrong scale is on the plan. Date: November 20, 2002 Signajritfe PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REV - IONS ❑ Plat 0 Site,(}ility ❑ Landscape ❑ Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENT -SUBMIT MYLARS PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: ember 27, 1996 DEPT: 04�r fZJ PROJECT: #17-90C Spring Creek Center PUD -Preliminary PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received by: Monday, December 16, 1996 �+t�wK�he�ih v� Goisfrercf b o� �uc ✓eacwa y5 ui'/l ✓egu e >iC�i iar.nan/ t7•rGf f'iha� iG�%S /n✓es%7�ya /-rbvrs RS Gam/ a$ lAa vesnCn ✓C. r�ak%l ka. /�ai��u/ate rL�le.-e5t rn .�v-c�mvrvv.rv/f'S fv /die t'�ferral �ba�.-mays, �T�mbe.-lr�•c ��C /�.vs�«f� Date: l2 1319 Signature CHECK: IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE [� UTILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: November 27, 1996 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #17-90C Spring Creek Center PUD - Preliminary PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received by: Monday, December 16, 1996 Soils Report: • Recommends perimeter drains - sump and pump system or daylight to Spring Creek (o.k. to daylight to Spring Creek with Stormwater as part of drainage design) Traffic Study: • City Traffic 'Engineer has requested that the curb cuts along Midpoint Drive be consolidated into one • Study is based on Timberline/ Midpoint intersection being a right-in/right-out in the short range. However, there is no discussion about whether this assumption was made because there will eventually be a median in Timberline since it is a major arterial, when there will be the need for a median in Timberline, and/or if the median is needed to be constructed as a result of this development or at a certain phase of this development. Please clarify. (According to the City's Timberline project engineers, the City has no plans for improving Timberline south of Prospect Road at this time other than some changes to the lane striping when the Timberline extension is complete.) Date: 12�12Itib Signature K` CHECK: IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE El PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS SITE ® LANDSCAPE $� UTILITY Site Plan: • City staff wiill discuss whether or not the City wants to pay for reconstructing the sidewalk on Prospect Road to the new standard detached walk where it is possible along the frontage of this site. Due to the existing street trees behind the walk, it is unlikely that the City will want to relocate and reconstruct the sidewalk at this time. • Eliminate the "bump out' in the sidewalk around the existing fire hydrant on Specht Point Road. Relocate the fire hydrant and leave the sidewalk in its standard location along the r.o.w. line. • Label all parkway and sidewalk widths including any existing sidewalks (Prospect) • Driveways must intersect Specht Point Road at 900 for at least 50 feet back from the travelway. Since these will be relatively high volume driveways it is important that drivers are able to approach the intersection at the best possible angle for visibility. Also, angled driveways result in vehicles stopping at awkward approach angles in and out of the driveway and often obstruct the access altogether. • The car wash exit on Lot 1 conflicts with the entrance and exit to Lot 1 Plat: • Clarify the r.o.w. dedication (existing and/or proposed) for all streets around the perimeter of the site - especially Timberline Road. • The minimum required utility easement width along Timberline Road and Prospect Road is 15 feet and 9 feet along Specht Point and Midpoint. Utility Plans • See comments on site plan, etc. • It is not clear from the plans what the proposed improvements to Timberline Road are - there are no dimensions, no clear distinction between existing and proposed asphalt, curb and gutter, improvements across Spring Creek (e.g. sidewalk), striping and lane configuration Timberline, etc. Even though this is a preliminary, there should be some basic information to show what is proposed and existing in terms of street improvements. • Provide the preliminary off -site design for the ultimate width of Timberline Road to the south, where Timberline Road will be centered on the section line, and show the curvature and transition to the Spring Creek bridge (being the ultimate east curb line). Set the curb and gutter location along this property based on that design. Mike Herzig has some background on what was planned for the Timberline alignment south of Prospect and how it would transition to the south to be centered along the section line. The only improvements the City has planned for Timberline south of Prospect, as described previously, are changes to the striping and laneage (existing free right, and left/ through will be reconfigured for a dedicated left turn lane and a through/right). The new street standards require a 4.5 foot wide sidewalk on Midpoint and Specht Point and a 6 foot parkway width - label all parkway and sidewalk width around the perimeter of the site and provide additional sidewalk easement where necessary. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: November 27, 1996 DEPT: Mapping PROJECT: #17-90C Spring Creek Center PUD -Preliminary PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received by: Monday, December 16, 1996 �vIck pjc, M. Date: Signature CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: 12/11/02 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Slpring Creek Center Pud This is a combined minor amendment and revision to the project ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff All comments must be received by: 12/30/02 ❑ Igo Problems roblems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: Spring Creek Center Revisions Sheets 2 and 6 — include all the area that is being changed in the bubble. Sheet 10 — Missing the striping #'s and letters on the details and the table that contained this information which was on the plans previously. This needs to be put back on the plans. Missing some notes that were on this sheet previously. Add in the island elevations and curve #'s and length #'s back on the island detail. Also missing a prior note from this detail. The island detail for template — if this was added just for my use I don't need it now that the proposed changes are shown on the Timberline Road and Midpoint Drive striping plan. It is at a scale that I can use the turning template on. It is tight, but better than existing condition. Date: /� SigUature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ❑ Plat ❑ Site ❑ Utility 0 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 11 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS a PROJECT 6 COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: February 8, 1999 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #2-99 Advanced Energy, Buildings 7 & 8 — Final Plan (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, March 3, 1999 Advanced Energy, Buildings 7 and 8 March 8, 1999 • Provide the additional easements needed as identified by stormwater • Please make the project name on the Title Sheet read "Advanced Energy, Buildings 7 and 8" • Add Timberline Road plan and profile and striping sheet to the index and number it as sheet 9 of 13 On Timberline Road plan and profile and striping sheet. • The design of Timberline and the right turnlane is not adequate • For the asphalt pavement joint detail - the cut and additional pavement needs to be in accordance with the City of Fort Collins 'Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines' • For including this sheet in this set - do not provide the storm sewer references or the Specht Point Road striping plan as this project will not be putting those improvements in. • This page needs to be numbered as a part of this set of plans and labeled with this projects name and not Spring Creek Centers. • For additional comments on this sheet see Traffic Operations comments (for advanced energy, buildings 7 and 8) dated 2/27/99 and comments from Tim Blandford on Spring Creek Center returned previously. Date: 3� 9/ Signature: ('5• W/lfjli/ CHECK HERE IF YOU WISE TO RECER COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat a Site _ Drqc Report _ Olff �x Ugly o, Reda Utility _ Iaads* OWN&i City of Fort Collins k«* tit9(o REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 26, 1999 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #17-9OD Spring Creek Center P.U.D. — Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Bob Blanchard no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 ❑ No Comment ❑� Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) MAJOR COMMENTS AND CONCERNS WITH THE UTILITY PLANS o Update the General Notes. o Reference the new vertical control. The City no longer uses the Black Bolt Survey. o East Prospect Road is classified as an arterial street. You will need to dedicate an additional 7.5 feet along the frontage of the property per the City Code. o You will need to dedicate a 15 foot utility easement along East Prospect Road. T+mbertine-Road-folio ws-{he-section line -front -Of -this -Project— f-that-is-therase,-You-n,v"'-n� additional-2G-6-feet-0f-RBW-dedication per-the-lty-C-ede.- o The utility easement along Timberline Road needs to be a 15 foot utility easement per the street standards. o Midpoint Drive is classified as a collector street on the Master Street Plan. You will need to dedicate an additional 3 feet of ROW along the frontage of the property per the City Code. o Please add the maintenance guarantee and repair guarantee notes to the plat. 0 The Director of Engineering is now referred to the City Engineer. Please modify the plat to reflect this change. continue to page 2 Date: v � CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ✓ Plat ✓ Site Drainage Report _ Other ✓ Utility ✓ Redline Utility ✓ Landscape �- DATE: May 6, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #17-90D Spring Creek Center P.U.D. - (LDGS) Final PLANNER: Mike Ludwig ENGINEER: Michael Dean All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, May 6, 1998 PLAT Provide a legal description and a statement of ownership and maintenance. Provide a copy of the Plat in the Utility Plans. Provide cross access easements where needed. UTILITY PLAN Swale 12 is located within the Public R.O.W. and needs to be moved on to the Spring Creek Center Site. The sidewalk should be located within the Public R.O.W.. The site has a poor circulation pattern that results in conflicting left hand turns which are a safety concern. Prepare cost estimate for future construction of the local street portion of Timberline Rd. Improvements for escrow purposes. ** See redline plans for additional comments ** Date: MAY I:i 19�P Signature:^ AI Please send copies of marked revisions ✓Plat ✓Site Utility ,Landscape �M City of Fort Collins REVISION li!.' COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 21, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #17-90D Spring Creek Center P.U.D. - (LDGS) Final PLANNER: Mike Ludwig ENGINEER: Michael Dean All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, February 11, 1998 PLAT Title of Plat should read "A Plat of Spring Creek Center P.U.D. being a replat of Tract A, Centerpoint Park. Provide a legal description and a statement of ownership and maintenance. Use the new Attorney's certificate language attached. Provide a copy of the Plat in the Utility Plans. Additional comments provided by the Mapping Division. UTILITY PLAN Swale 12 is located within the Public R.O.W. and needs to be moved on to the Spring Creek Center Site. The sidewalk should be located within the Public R.O.W.. The T.I.S. does not appear to be accurate please revise and resubmit. The Business Park Land Use classification is too vague without knowing the proposed tenants. The site has a poor circulation pattern that results in conflicting left hand turns which are a safety concern. Prepare cost estimate for future construction of the local street portion of Timberline Rd. Improvements for escrow purposes. ** See redline plans for additional comments ** Date:/ 1��8 Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions _Zflat Site Utility _�fandscape City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: Lary 21, 1998 TO: Mapping PROJECT: #17-90D Spring Creek Center P.U.D.- (LDGS) Final All comments must be received by Mike Ludwig no later than the staff review meeting;: Wednesday, February 11,1998 IH7 —• rrow5 61P� c � Ii rC P :, �_ 1 LD+ � i �� P`> .) �IUIl )71 Ct i �C'F - 1. Ex�i-� .J� % /lC OuTE2 /3o✓rvoAn� GCofes-j-y{c.'- CUg✓c`S (�a NeT �1il r MA-i TI-fc: TIZ� vfojs ID"q-r(C c-N'r rLR�- /�^'S �� AtTH L7 00.,J- _%/>rJ0 i?N-i C Loic' _ Date: Signature: CM HERE EI YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ,[ Plat _ Sid; _ Drainage Report _ Mer Utility _ Roche Utility _ Landscape REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: it 10, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Spring Creek Center P.U.D. PLANNER: Mike Ludwig FrIoUn0AeX ✓ie..0000i..J%(_ (.t5/S://GnJ �0MpP/• Pr F �). 5�, ,P cam.,//j?lk iN ze-csf /-rc sfJ• 2. loco- 7- .-4- fr, s - �,� -�e rs ee �•w �� e �wA-/ N ,N4er 4r,lu*l /Qc & ct s/.v c G 7 s �fi([ /P e /.��7 Kt m6 e/ /A! L �L/%2e o2.. lj ! %7D at die. 3, j.a�c �.v�e �cco✓a,� ek L aQ:c�C �.au v- JJ P /4+ 4U f ovcec/ 1 Date: /7 _Signature: d cross- Sec_Al • f 04 90.,. 7 C.-ce l f-1" PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: February 6, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: REVISIONS #17-90C Spring Creek Center - Preliminary PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received by: • On the final plans please show what obstacles are in the way that are causing the sidewalk to have to meander along Specht Point Road. Depending on the nature of the obstruction to placing the sidewalk in its standard location, it may be that the obstruction should be moved (i.e. relocating a fire hydrant) rather than meander the walk in this one location. • The preliminary proposed striping plan for Timberline Road was very useful. The plan has been filed,the City Engineering Department's preliminary P.U.D. file for future reference. W Date: t,- Signature L 1ify - CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY