The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCAPITOL HILL ADDITION BLOCK 306 617 WOOD STREET - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2007-11-26W ffi, PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 4, 2006 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt #22-06 617 WOOD ST PDP-TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: August 30, 2006 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems W 0,J 5 Pa,,,e`I i , zeo3 12f4A1.T`( FFx S AaU- APOL y - 714P CE $*F-F� {1� Zi I r�lv7`z`�' Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other 6a _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape CltvafFl_ REVISION COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: October 17, 2006 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 22-06 617 WOOD ST. PDP - TYPE II THIRD ROUND OF REVIEW Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: November 1, 2006 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape STAFF PROJECT REVIEW CRAIG MCKEE Date: 11/06/2006 Staff has reviewed your submittal for MORIE AT CAPITOL HILL (617 WOOD STREET), PDP - TYPE 2, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt ic: General Nu her Created: 11/6/2006 [ 11 / 61 Currlanning' ent Ps comments are on red -lined plans being forward to the applicant. Number: 85 Created: 11 /6/2006 (11/6/061 The llowing staff comments were expressed at the S Review meeting on Nove er 1, 2006: Light & Power a. The dwelling units muk be metered b. It may be beneficial to discuss utility services Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 66 110/19/061 On the Landscape landscaping being installed, or certificates of occupancy can b Plan. Topic: Site Plan a utility meeting to Created: 10/ 19/2006 ase%,dde required note about llatngsecured ... before Plethe red -lined Landscape Number:60 Created: 10 9/2006 [ 10/ 19/061 On th ite Plan cover sheet, under LAND USE ATISTICS, the one line ite eating with "total land area and location an ount of open space uded" refers to residential, business, commercial, d industrial eas. This would seem to be incorrect in that there does of appear t e any business, commercial, and industrial areas in this p ect. Nu,Ober: 61 Created: 10/ 19/2006 [ /19/06] The 2 monument signs (at street front and alley) shown on the ite & Landscape Plans should be removed from the plans. Signs are reviewed and approved separate from the Project Development Plan review Page 1 through the Zoning Department, based on the Sign Code. The Planning & %in� does not have authority over the signs. Created: 10/19/2006 On the Site Plan please show the 9' dimension for the age door setback the porch front on Unit B, being the subject your request for mo tion of standard set forth in Section 4.7 1)(C). Also, in your Modification of dards Request, please add "for t B" at the end of the sentence that req sts a 9' setback instead of Number: 63 eated: 10/ 19/2006 [10/19/061 More just a curious q stion .. t happens in the "area wells" for each unit? Number: 64 Created: 10/ 19/2006 [10/19/061 The gates to the veways for Uni C & D, backing to the alley, are being shown to either ove to the corners of walls or another gate is being proposed. WW correct? If there is a gate in a corners of these small courtyards there be walkways provided from th ates to the alley? Number. Created: 10/ 19/200 [10/1 06] The Site Plan shows 3 "150' Fire Hose" lines from Wood et to ints back on the property. Will the gates on the north and south Property lines (2 each) remain unlocked so that firemen can get through the gates, with their hoses, without delay? Department: Engineering Topic: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Number: 26 Created: 8/25/2006 [10/25/061 Credit may also be used for easement review fees. 18/25/06] It appears that an overpayment of $460 was made on Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF). The City will issue a credit toward the final compliance plan review such that the final plan review fee will only be $540 rather than $1000. Number: 37 Created: 8/31 /2006 [10/25/061 Penalty street cut fees will apply to this project for Wood Street. [10/3/06] Same comment relating to street cuts on Wood Street for water service connections. [8/31 /06[ Pavement management comment - Wood Street was paved in 2003. Penalties will apply to any street cuts made on Wood Street - triple street cut fees. Page 2 Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 67 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/061 A drainage easement is required for the detention ponds and associated drainage structures connected to them. Please submit a drainage deed of dedication and legal description for review with a City review fee of $250.00. Number: 68 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/061 The detention pond to the south shall outlet to the gutter on Wood street via a sidewalk chase and concrete channel through the parkway. Show this on the plan and provide construction details. Number: 69 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/061 Please show the low flow concrete channel on the grading plan. A detail is provided. Number: 70 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/061 There are two 5 foot utility easements being labeled on the far north and south boundaries of the project. If these easements are for any public utilities, they must be recorded by separate document. Please submit deeds of dedication and legal descriptions for these proposed easements. The review fee is $250 per document. Number: 71 Created: 10/25/2006 110/25/061 Provide cross sections for B-B and C-C as shown on the red- lines, Grading & Drainage Plan. Number: 72 Created: 10/25/2006 110/25/061 Please add a standard City signature approval block to sheet DTI - Detail sheet Number: 73 Created: 10/25/2006 [10/25/061 Add street names to sheet UTl. Topic: Site Plan Number: 8 Created: 8/ 15/2006 110/25/061 No easement document has been submitted. All easement documents and review fees shall be submitted for at least one review prior to final plan approval. 110/3/061 The applicant has indicated that the standard 8 foot utility easement behind the alley ROW may not be needed by the public utility companies however, an 8 foot utility easement is being shown on the plans and no variance request has been submitted by the engineer. Until a formal variance request has been submitted and approved by the utility providers, the City will require that an 8 foot wide utility easement dedication be submitted with a $250 transportation development review fee. If a variance Page 3 request is submitted and approved, the utility easement should be removed from the plans. 18/ 15/061 Alley standards require that an 8 foot wide utility easement be dedicated behind the alley right-of-way. This proposed easement shall be shown and labeled on the Site Plan. Topic: Utility PIans Number: 14 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [ 10/25/061 There are still some inconsistencies with property boundary line types. This may be corrected at the final compliance stage. [ 10/3/061 The lot lines are now being shown but the line types are very inconsistent or do not correspond to the legend. Please revise line types accordingly, see redlines for clarification. [8/ 15/06] Please show the existing lot line between lots 4 and 5 on all sheets in the Utility Plan set. Clearly label property lines and existing right- of-way limits. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann plc: Fire N ber: 74 Created: 11 / 1 /2006 [11 / 06] ADDRESSING: PFA requires the units to be addreVnift letters in a clockwise fashion from first unit accessed. (U Unit A as own, but Unit C becomes B, Unit D becomes C a becomes D). Number:75 N 111/1/061 GATES L document requiring remain unlocked, to Department: Stormwate Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 41 111/2/061 This can be [10/5/06] Repeat Corr, the grading plan. [9/1/06] The flows o alley. Please doc en neighboring p erties Created: / 1 /2006 0: Language needs to included in the HOA gates (on the side f the property) shall th PFA access r2duirements. Issue Created:9/1/2006 "sed at Final Compliance. Please documents with detailed grading on m the site need to be directed �N t on the drainage plan that onsil and flow to the street and alley. street and the will not enter seeds to be done with arrows and spot elevations that support the de Num r:55 Created:l0/5/2006 [1 /06] Can be addressed at Final Compliance. 015/061 Please include the City's standard water quality outlet detail on the plans. Page 4 Go Px Project Comments Sheet �� Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: February 8, 2007 Project: 617 WOOD STREET (MORIE AT CAPITOL HILL) - POP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Steve OR in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 14, 2007 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 26 Created: 8/25/2006 [2/8/07] Same comment just for reference. $540 was paid but we still need to collect $250 for the City easement review fee and $51.00 (check made out to Larimer County Clerk) for County recording fee. 11 D/25/06] Credit may also be used for easement review fees. [6/25/06] It appears that an overpayment of $460 was made on Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF). The City will issue a credit toward the final compliance plan review such that the final plan review fee will only be $540 rather than $1000. Number: 86 Created: 2/8/2007 [2/8/07] A blanket easement legal description was submitted for review. Please revise the legal description per the red -line comments and submit a revised legal with a completed deed of dedication. Our standard deed of dedication template has been provided with the red -lines for your use. I can also email you the template document. A check for $250 to the City is due for easement review & processing + a check to the Latimer County Clerk for $51.00 must be submitted for County recording fees ($6.00 for the first page + $5.00 each additional page). All fees must be collected and the easement must be ready to record prior to final Utility Plan approval. Number: 87 Created: 2/8/2007 12/8/071 Please circle and label the SITE on the cover sheet vicinity map. Number: 88 Created: 2/8/2007 Dat Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ -Plat Site Drainage Report Other / _ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 i PROJECT Citvot Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: August 4, 2006 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt #22-06 617 WOOD ST PDP-TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: August 30, 2006 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems Problems or concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) vo t 1 /1 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other_ —Plity Redline Utility , ,Landscape ')__ E/�5�-'MeJJT>— cttvofFortcotuns ia STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Craig McKee Date: 09/01/2006 McKee Brothers, LLC 221 East Lincoln Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 617 WOOD STREET HOMES, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) - TYPE 2, and we offer the following comments: De artment: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topr • Building Elevations Numbe 50 Created: 9/1/2006 [9/ 1/06] lease see red -lined Exterior Building Elevations (A2. , A2.2) for Current Pla nine comments. Topic: Landsc a Plans Number: 46 Created: / 1 / 2006 [9/ 1/06] See red -Tin Landscape Plan (L1) for Curr t Planning comments. Number: 47 reated: 9 / 1 / 2006 [9/ 1/06] Street trees are requ' ed along th ood Street frontage. In this case they should be between 3' 7' behi the attached sidewalk. Number: 48 [9/ 1/061 The Landscape Plan is The actual plant species, sizes, c must be included on the Final : Created: 9/ 1 / 2006 any sort of Plant List or Legend. nd standard landscape notes tan. At the PDP stage just general locations for deciduo s & evergreen tr sand planting areas for deciduous 8v evergreen sh bs must be shown. Topic: Site Plan Number: 43 C\thisrequire / 2006 [9/ 1/06] Curren Tanning and Zoning have cut the Floor Area Ratio (FA for this project. Based on the rs et forth in Section 4.7(D 5) in the Land Use Code, lots area m 'mum FAR of 0.33 on e rear 50% of the lot as it existed o5, 19 The PDP Site Ian as submitted appears to slightly require nt. lVun er:44 Created:9/1/2006 [9 / cr] Please indicatethe existing zoning on the property on the eliminary Site Plan. Page 1 Nbi4ber: 45 Created: 9 / 1 / 2006 [9/ 1/ See red -lined Architectural Site Plan (AS.1) for Current Pl ning comments. Number: 49 Create / 1 / 2006 [9/l/06] The Site and L cape Plans must b r demonstrate that the minimum side yard widths, as forth in on 4.7(E)(4) of the Land Use Code, are being met. Topic: Utility Plans Number:42 Cre :9/1/2006 [9/1/06] Dennis G nwalt of Comcast Cable TV indi ed that they would like a 6' wide ty easement outside of the alley right -of- long the back side is property. Also, Comcast will need to have conta ith the prop owner about how to pre -wire the buildings so that services c be vided without going through the landscaping. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 26 Created: 8 / 25 / 2006 [8/25/06] It appears that an overpayment of $460 was made on Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF). The City will issue a credit toward the final compliance plan review such that the final plan review fee will only be $540 rather than $1000. Number: 36 Created: 8 / 31 / 2006 [8/31/061 Per the Aug 30 staff review meeting, it appears that two easement documents will need to be recorded for this project. One for the 8 foot utility easement behind the alley ROW and a utility easement from the alley up to the front of the units facing Wood Street for power, gas etc... Each easement document must have a legal description and exhibit map prepared and stamped by a CO licensed surveyor and submitted for review by the City prior to recordation. The City review fee is $250 per easement document. Both easements must be recorded prior to final plan approval and issuance of a Development Construction Permit. Number: 37 Created: 8 / 31 / 2006 [8/31/06] Pavement management comment - Wood Street was paved in 2003. Penalties will apply to any street cuts made on Wood street - triple street cut fees. Topic: Site Plan Number: 7 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Show and label all existing lot lines on the Site Plan. Provide the legal description on the cover sheet. Page 2 Number: 8 Created: 8/ 15/2006 18/ 15/06] Alley standards require that an 8 foot wide utility easement be dedicated behind the alley right-of-way. This proposed easement shall be shown and labeled on the Site Plan. Number: 9 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Please dimension the existing sidewalk on the Site Plan and clearly label all property lines. Per the staff review meeting on Aug 30, a minimum 6 foot wide attached sidewalk shall be constructed in front of the development on Wood Street. Please accurately show this on the Utility and Site Plans. Topic: Technical Services Number: 32 Created: 8/29/2006 [8/29/06] Please change the title of the plans. Addresses may change and buildings will not have the same address. Do not use address numbers in the title. Each plan sheet should have an adequate title description, see red line comments attached. Topic: Utility PIans Number: 10 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Please add the legal description and subdivision name to the title on the cover sheet and provide the month and year below the title. Number: 11 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Provide the owner's name, address, and phone number on the cover sheet Number: 12 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Provide the geotechnical engineer's name, address, and phone number with a reference to the soils report date on the cover sheet. Number: 13 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Provide all 48 standard PDP general notes from Appendix E-1. Any notes that do not apply to the project may be lined out but should not be deleted. Number: 14 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Please show the existing lot line between lots 4 and 5 on all sheets in the Utility Plan set. Clearly label property lines and existing right- of-way limits. Number: 15 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Show surface drainage patterns with arrows along the north and south sides of the proposed duplexes on the Grading Plan sheet. No drainage shall be conveyed or diverted onto the adjacent property. Show any Page 3 proposed walls on the site that may prevent positive flow to the street or alley. Number: 16 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Show new proposed curb cuts for the drive approaches on Wood Street on the Grading Plan sheet. Number: 17 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Please provide the finish floor building elevations on the Grading Plan. Number: 18 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Show and label the proposed 8 foot wide utility easement to be dedicated behind the alley right-of-way on the Utility Plan sheet. Number: 19 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Please show and label the nearest fire hydrant location on the Utility Plan sheet. Number: 20 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Show and label all property lines and right-of-way limits on the Utility Plan sheet. Number: 21 Created: 8 / 15 / 2006 [8/ 15/06] Show proposed driveway curb cuts on Wood Street and proposed limits of street cuts for water connections on the Utility Plan sheet. Add the City standard street cut note provided to the plans. Number: 22 Created: 8 / 15 / 2006 [8/ 15/06] Please remove the City standard engineer's indemnification statements from the Utility Plan sheet. These statements are shown on the cover sheet only. Number: 23 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Please refer to the redline check prints for addition comments related to drafting and labeling. Departm Light & Power Issue Contact: Dou e Topic: Light & Number: 6 reated: 8/1 / 15/2006 [8/ 15/06] Developer will ne or 1 electric utility requirements, electric facility to electric development c with Light 83 Power En i 21-6700). Page 4 Cityof Fort Collins Current Planning REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 20, 2006 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 22-06 617 WOOD ST. PDP-TYPE II SECOND ROUND OF REVIEW Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: October 4, 2006 Note - No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (3ee below, attached, or DMS) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape QV of Fort Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cityof Forl Collins CRAIG MCKEE Date: 10/09/2006 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 617 WOOD STREET, PDp - TYPE 2, and we offer the following comments: lvepartme urrent Planning Issue Contact: Ste Topic: Stormwat Number: 58 eated: 10/9/2006 [10/9/061 There are issues asso ' e storm drainage forF s water'development. If they c esolved in a timel satisfaction, er than October 18th, then this item c to St sly gos to g & Zoning Board on November 16th. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 37 Created: 8/31 /2006 [10/3/061 Same comment relating to street cuts on Wood Street for water service connections. [8/31/061 Pavement management comment - Wood Street was paved in 2003. Penalties will apply to any street cuts made on Wood Street - triple street cut fees. Topic: Site Plan Number: 8 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [10/3/061 The applicant has indicated that the standard 8 foot utility easement behind the alley ROW may not be needed by the public utility companies however, an 8 foot utility easement is being shown on the plans and no variance request has been submitted by the engineer. Until a formal variance request has been submitted and approved by the utility providers, the City will require that an 8 foot wide utility easement dedication be submitted with a $250 transportation development review fee. If a variance request is submitted and approved, the utility easement should be removed from the plans. [8/ 15/061 Alley standards require that an 8 foot wide utility easement be dedicated behind the alley right-of-way. This proposed easement shall be shown and labeled on the Site Plan. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 13 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [10/3/061 Several general notes that apply to this development were lined out on the Utility Plans. Please see the redlines for clarification on which notes can be lined out. Page 1 w'. [8/ 15/06] Provide all 48 standard PDP general notes from Appendix E-1. Any notes that do not apply to the project may be lined out but should not be deleted. Number: 14 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [ 10/3/061 The lot lines are now being shown but the line types are very inconsistent or do not correspond to the legend. Please revise line types accordingly, see redlines for clarification. [8/ 15/06] Please show the existing lot line between lots 4 and 5 on all sheets in the Utility Plan set. Clearly label property lines and existing right- of-way limits. Number: 20 Created: 8/ 15/2006 [10/3/06] ROW dimensions are not properly labeled on the Site and Utility Plans. The alley ROW is 20 feet wide and Wood Street ROW is 100 feet wide as dedicated on the Capitol Hill Subdivision Plat. Please revise the labeling and dimensions on the plans accordingly. [8/ 15/06] Show and label all property lines and right-of-way limits on the Utility Plan sheet. nent: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Utility Plans 31 Created: 8/29/2006 [10/3/0 Please label and dimension all walkways on the utility S. Thanks. [8/29/06] Sid alk on Wood isn't represented consistently een the site and utility plan se What is the proposed improvement ctly? Department: Stormwat -Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 54 Created: 10/4/2006 [10/4/06] Show water and sewer se es on landscape plan and provide required separation distances. ZthIculations ent: Stormwater- ter -Wastewater Issue : Wes Lamarq tormwater38 Created.9 20066] Ple a include the net increase in a paragraph m e text of the r rt.lease clearly document the impervious area's net increas or The calculations indicate the net increase to be over 7,000 s , ould require this site to provide onsite quantity and quality Page 2