The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHARMONY RIDGE FILING 2 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-08-04REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: July 23, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: 49-95F Harmony Ridge, Filing 2 — PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: August 18, 2004 I i lT A emit -rt4AT l��-�/cS 3 / P� � �4u� NoT �l.l��-cam ssa f27 , No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** NDPr2Y A6- Cw565. L, a/J Hoj of _r�` -PA USA(7,r l7- SA I'l `LS Sllclu�, L 7 zv,4ni- ✓i�Di�c7 L�lVI�CsCtlPcro oN //lfr4(f)vi^ % `-!< CJ /-1 A T /S TNIf L /.0 Cr /,l. S SG✓ -+-� d F TN�r ScscT IO A -A( �u �=-.. 7 47 tom; �)/C4TiNJ !--5' aFAoo�T�o.�a� t2cw - L,'cJ-�/I� Name (plealse print) I Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS i�-Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility Landscape city of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT Citvof Fort Collins Curren•'. F'lan:;ing SHEET DATE: Febmary 4, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #49-95G Harmony Ridge PDP, 2nd Filing, Final Compliance All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: March 2, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) t-NVtCoPr DO %-,ttL 1�c�� itfc tv-3TC n l�,'?lv ter• accN N .0 i <_7 17zj Name (please print) h CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS -Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet LEE-�:` r 4 Selected Departments Citv of Fort Coll: ins Department: Engineering Date: March 8, 2005 Project: HARMONY RIDGE, 2ND FILING, PDP/FC, #49-95F/G Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 115 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] Please provide an updated (to reflect the use of a concrete street section in the current plans) copy of "A Primer on the Design and Maintenance of the Water Quality Medians at Harmony Ridge Filing 2, Fort Collins, Colorado". This should also be signed and stamped. Topic: Street design Number: 80 Created: 12/22/2004 [3/1/05] Driveway widths were not shown on the plan view. [12/22/04] Show the driveway widths and locations on the plan view and have the edges and/or centerlines indicated on the profile view. Number: 84 Created: 12/22/2004 [3/2/05] After our meeting earlier this year, with the concrete now being shown on the plans, we were under the impression that the concrete would be extended to the entire Prairie Ridge Drive/Prairie Vista Drive intersection. The plans have the concrete fall short of this. After discussion at staff review and subsequent discussion with the City's Pavement Engineer, extending the concrete to the projection of the eastern flowline of Prairie Ridge Drive is satisfactory instead of the entire intersection. [12/22/04] After City Engineer and City Pavement Management Engineer review of the design and report by relating to the alternative inverted crown section for Prairie Vista Drive, this road section will be required to be constructed as a concrete (not asphalt) section. Add a note on the design for this sheet that the geotechnical pavement design report is required to address soil mitigation measures for this concrete section, as is required on all public streets. With the use of the concrete section, there will not be a need to extend the maintenance and repair period beyond the standard, which was originally required in accordance with the letter from the City Engineer in response to the original variance request. Number: 85 Created: 12/22/2004 [3/1/05] With the pans still being shown rather than making it all concrete, the three pans that connect to Tract C are required to be 12' in width in accordance with Chapter 7 of LCUASS. Include a detajSpr the 12' pan. Signature /-: / Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site Drainage Report Y Other If!^T 4, Utility _ Redline Utility a Landscape <_„> Page I [12/22/04] The use of the concrete pans tying into the west end of the western median on Prairie Vista Drive aippears awkward in design because they may not be perpendicular to the direction of travel. In addition, the pavement from this area to about 70' west (the transition area from crown to inverted crown) has some concerns regarding flat spots and ponding. Given that this entire area is required to be concrete, please eliminate the use of the pans and look at warping the concrete section to start draining towards the median from points C16 and C17, this eliminates the use of pans and perhaps better ensures no ponding through this transition area. Number: 86 Created: 12/22/2004 [3/4/05] Please add a note on the construction plan set that any subsequent subsurface mitigation measures for the medians (such as cut-off walls) will need to be addressed at the time of the pavement design report. [12/22/041 Please :specify more detail information on sheet 5 as to how water is to enter the medians (especially the larger one) on Sheet 5. It indicated vertical infall curb and gutter but no information as to where periodic curb cuts are to be located. This information should be shown on both plan and profile sections. Number: 87 Created: 12/22/2004 [3/4/05] Still appears to be unresolved. [12/22/04] How is the point discharge at the termination of the full street construction heading west on Fromme Prairie Way supposed to be handled? Some sort of rip -rap or other measures needs to be implemented and okay'd with City Parks. Number: 90 Created: 12/22/2004 [3/4/05] Show patching for the area of curb and gutter and walk to be removed to encompass the entire bike lane. [12/22/041 There is a section of Fromme Prairie Way that was built with the Seneca Center project that falls within the area proposed for construction with this project, yet this is not apparent on the plan set. Please show whether the plans intend to tie into the existing grades or whether this section is intended to be entirely removed and replaced, sections of which are likely with the use of the inset parking. A demo plan should be provided to help illustrate this. In general it needs to be identified and clear how the street design ties into what was done with the Seneca Center project. Page 2 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: July 23, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: 49-95F Harmony Ridge, Filing 2 — PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: ►tip/ August 18, 2004 ' l r A ppc--Ails THAT 7RLOek s Ap-a- ,uo— /27 EDNo Comment F1Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **,PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** �, gp-,,,Nar+er �y L1:GA�_ Gw5E5, T f/e TR14-cT iJs.q c� �T , 7 SA �� L S E l�uco L % Ja �k/ f,4N ; ' tom,, � n1 NC Z L`T/V 1,/C CCI�GY•6 O AJ S/ /J e? (—(f q CJt4,; /S ]7-/i L/tiF �.S So✓:7-/ OF 7HC1 SCCT/O/�Ki�vu 7 `. Lam- b164T//J3 1•�� oFf�00,T,a"4 Name (please print) I Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS i-Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility Landscape City of Fort cou;ns Project Comments Sheet �''" Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: August 20, 2004 Project: HARMONY RIDGE PHASE 2 PDP - TYPE 1 All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: August 11, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction plans Number: 33 Created: 7/9/2004 [8/17/04] Ensure that this is on all sheets of the construction plans. [7/9/04] The Trilby Lateral Ditch Company should have a separate sign off, not within the City's utility approval block. Add "Parks and Recreation" and "Natural Resources" to the approval block. Number: 37 Created: 7/9/2004 [8/17/04] Carried over for reference. [7/9/04] There appears to be instances in which the maximum amount of sheet flow drainage over a sidewalk is being exceeded for the private drives that connect to Prairie Vista Drive. Topic: General Number: 25 Created: 7/9/2004 [8/17/04] Comment is left as unresolved. The response letter indicates it is the developer's intent to add Tract 1 to the language of the letter of intent, which is fine, it is just needed prior to a hearing. (7/9/04] A letter of intent is required for the construction along Prairie Ridge Drive onto the first filing. (The submitted letter of intent appears only valid for Tract 7.) Is the signature of the HOA president the extent of signatures needed for offsite easements onto the first filing? It may be worth verifying, especially if the bylaws of the HOA require a percentage off all the existing owners to sign. Number: 62 Created: 8/17/2004 ate ,-CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site Drainage Report Other_ v Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 [8/17/041 Fromme Prairie Way needs to be constructed fully to the property boundary (adjacent to Tract E) with curb, gutter and 30' width pavement. This is per direction given previously as noted below: From: Marc Virata To:Jim Newcomb Date: 3/18/04 2.52PM Subject: Re: Harmony Ridge PUD, Filing 2 (HRII) "2) The requirement to improve the entire length of FPW will be enforced as required per Code. We will not consider improving FPW only to the public street connection that you're proposing. The continuation of the sidewalk helps provide that trail connection." Also Note From the City Code: Sec. 24-95. Obligation for construction. "(a) The construction of the local portion of a public street is hereby declared to be the obligation of the owner of the adjacent property at the time such property is developed or redeveloped." Number: 65 Created: 8/1712004 [8/17/041 The inset parking along Fromme Prairie Way is of concern with how it attaches to the sidewalk. A 4.5' attached sidewalk is substandard and should be widened to 6' in order to provide shy distance from vehicles. Number: 66 Created: 8/17/2004 (8/17/04] For the parking spaces within the median of Prairie Vista Drive, please ensure that 19' of stall depth is maintained to the "flowline". Only about 17' is provided along the ends with the curve of the street. Please provide a detail of these parking areas on the construction plan set with dimensions, it is difficult to measure out with the scale on the plans the intended dimensions. Number: 67 Created: 8/17/2004 [8/17/04] Add a note on the plat indicating: "Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 14, Block 2 shall not take vehicular access off of Fromme Prairie Way. Access shall occur only from Prairie Vista Drive." A similar note will be added to the development agreement. (After staff review discussion it appears the developer would like the option for lot 14 to have driveway access to Fromme Prairie Way. Transportation discussed this issue further and would agree to the driveway access to Fromme Prairie Way, provided that inset parking along Fromme Prairie Way is expanded to this property to allow for at least one vehicle to park adjacent to the lot. If the inset parking is not expanded to this lot. then no driveway access will be allowed.) Topic: Plat Number: 27 Created: 7/9/2004 [8/17/04] Left as unresolved for the time being. [7/9/04] The plat language will need to be revised under the maintenance language to call out Tracts B & C as having a maintenance period of 5 years. Page 2 Number: 28 Created: 7/9/2004 [8/17/04] Does not appear to be addressed. [7/9/04] Provide the "private drive maintenance note' on the plat (this is the same note on page 2 of the site plan). Number: 70 Created: 8/20/2004 [8/20/04] Remove any references of "landscape easement" on the plat being dedicated to the City. Number: 71 Created: 8/20/2004 [8/20/04] Are Tracts B & C legally described in all locations on the plat (median noses)? Topic: Street design Number: 72 Created: 8/20/2004 [8/20/04] Ensure City general notes are provided on the construction plan set. Page 3 Name (Plea print) FINAL PLAN COMMENT SHEET City of Foil Collins Current Planning DATE: November 30, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #49-95G Harmony Ridge, 2nd Filing PDP - FINAL PLANS All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: December 29, 2004 M Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference ), 760u"pA417 4, 1C&/j(, CGo56. z, STAGE di✓ 6NEt73 tS �NColtREc7. 3. NUMrRuU3 p//9EN5/0/19 MY SSINb. - SEE / `' 1 / CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS '"Plat _Site Drainage Report _Other _Utility Redline Utility _Landscape Project Comments Sheet Qw�)k Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: December 22, 2004 Project: HARMONY RIDGE, 2ND FILING, PDP/FC, #49-95F/G Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction plans Number: 37 Created: 7/9/2004 [12/22/041 This is still an outstanding issue and appears evident with both private drives that intersect onto the north side of Prairie Vista Drive. [8/17/04] Carried over for reference. [7/9/04] There appears to be instances in which the maximum amount of sheet flow drainage over a sidewalk is being exceeded for the private drives that connect to Prairie Vista Drive. Topic: General Number: 25 Created: 7/9/2004 [12/22/04] We will need a copy of the signed easement agreement in order to sign off on the plans at the time the plans are complete and ready for signature. [8/17/04] Comment is left as unresolved. The response letter indicates it is the developer's intent to add Traci: 1 to the language of the letter of intent, which is fine, it is just needed prior to a hearing. [7/9/04] A letter of intent is required for the construction along Prairie Ridge Drive onto the first filing. (The submitted letter of intent appears only valid for Tract 7.) Is the signature of the HOA president the extent of signatures needed for offsite easements onto the first filing? It may be worth verifying, especially if the bylaws of the HOA require a percentage off all the existing owners to sign. Number: 65 Created: 8/17/2004 [12/22/04] Please label the sidewalk width(s) proposed on this street (and all other streets). It is difficult to tell what is proposed on the construction plans (perhaps add the details shown on Sheet 3 of the site plan). I believe the design is calling for a 6' sidewalk that becomes attached when inset parking is provided? [8/17/041 The inset parking along Fromme Prairie Way is of concern with how it attaches to the sidewalk. A 4.5' attached sidewalk is substandard and should be widened to 6' in order to provide shy distance from vehicles. z az C < Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS `Plat ✓ Site Drainage Report Other ,--Utility ✓Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number: 91 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] The site and landscape plans do not need to be exhibits to the construction plans and just add additional duplication to the "Final Development Plan Documents" set. Number: 92 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] See redlines for any additional comments. Another round of review is needed to further look at the :street design with the new information to be provided. Topic: Plat Number: 28 Created: 7/9/2004 [12/22/04] Again, does not appear to be addressed. [8/17/04] Does not appear to be addressed. [7/9/04] Provide the "private drive maintenance note' on the plat (this is the same note on page 2 of the site plan). Number: 76 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] Add the following note to the plat: "No lots shall be allowed vehicular (driveway) access off of Fromme Prairie Way." Topic: Street design Number: 77 Created: 12/22/2004 [12122/04] Provide centerline profiles on all street design sheets (a centerline profile is not required with the alternative inverted crown street section). Number: 78 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] Label widths of right-of-way, utility easements, and sidewalk. Number: 79 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] Add additional sub-gridlines to the profiles to make reading elevations and distances easier. Number: 80 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] Show the driveway widths and locations on the plan view and have the edges and/or centerlines indicated on the profile view. Number: 81 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/041 Show additional profiles past the termination points in order to provide enough information to illustrate how profile grades tie into existing streets and/or grades. Number: 82 Created: 12/22/2004 [12122/04] The detail sheet specifies the use of a 1' outfall gutter pan and a 2' infall gutter pan, the outfall gutter pan should be changed to 2' in order to provide a consistent section and transition area from spill to catch curb. Number: 83 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22104] Provide cross sections every 50' for the alternative inverted crown street section on Prairie Vista Drive in order to get a better idea regarding slopes and drainage through this area. Either provide cross sections or spot elevations at points along the neckdowns for Fromme Prairie Way as redlined. Page 2 Number: 84 Created: 12122/2004 [12/22/04] After City Engineer and City Pavement Management Engineer review of the design and report by relating to the alternative inverted crown section for Prairie Vista Drive, this road section will be required to be constructed as a concrete (not asphalt) section. Add a note on the design for this sheet that the geotechnical pavement design report is required to address soil mitigation measures for this concrete section, as is required on all public streets. With the use of the concrete section, there will not be a need to extend the maintenance and repair period beyond the standard, which was originally required in accordance with the letter from the City Engineer in response to the original variance request. Number: 85 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] The use of the concrete pans tying into the west end of the western median on Prairie Vista Drive appears awkward in design because they may not be perpendicular to the direction of travel. In addition, the pavement from this area to about 70' west (the transition area from crown to inverted crown) has some concerns regarding flat spots and ponding. Given that this entire area is required to be concrete, please eliminate the use of the pans and look at warping the concrete section to start draining towards the median from points C16 and C17, this eliminates the use of pans and perhaps better ensures no ponding through this transition area. Number: 86 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] Please specify more detail information on sheet 5 as to how water is to enter the medians (especially the larger one) on Sheet 5. It indicated vertical infall curb and gutter but no information as to where periodic curb cuts are to be located. This information should be shown on both plan and profile sections. Number: 87 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] How is the point discharge at the termination of the full street construction heading west on Fromme Prairie Way supposed to be handled? Some sort of rip -rap or other measures needs to be implemented and okay'd with City Parks. Number: 88 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] The sidewalk connection heading west off of Fromme Prairie Way appears to perhaps be attached to the roadway. Please clarify the design. In addition more grading information is needed as to how this will be constructed. Number: 89 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] Please provide 15' radii, not 5' radii for the areas along the flowline that provide inset parking on Fromme Prairie Way. Street sweeping operations cannot get to areas with less than a 15' radii. Number: 90 Created: 12/22/2004 [12/22/04] There is a section of Fromme Prairie Way that was built with the Seneca Center project that falls within the area proposed for construction with this project, yet this is not apparent on the plan set. Please show whether the plans intend to tie into the existing grades or whether this section is intended to be entirely removed and replaced, sections of which are likely with the use of the inset parking. A demo plan should be provided to help illustrate this. In general it needs to be identified and clear how the street design ties into what was done with the Seneca Center project. Page 3