Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRAINTREE COMMERCIAL PUD PHASE II REPLAT TRACT G - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-06-09REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 13, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: The Preserve Apts. — Phase 2 All comments must be received by Mark McCallum no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 General Comments: ♦ A copy of the off -site construction easement filed at the County is required before the 1_ jn,inecring Department will sign the utility plan mvlars. ♦ The handout attached to this letter has some additional information that should he added to the Final Plat. ♦ Please check all access ramps within the R.O.W. The mid-hlock crossinc access does not appear to he correct for it does not extend to the street. Process Remainine;: I Mylars - Utility, Site, Landscape.. and Plat. The Site, Landscape, and Plat mylars go to Sicve Olt in the Current Planning Department. 3. Development Agreement - At this point 1 am determining if this is needed. ;. Development Construction Permit (DCP) - I have enclosed a brochure that explains the DCP process. Also enclosed is the DCP Application. Please note that the DCP Meeting xN ill not occur until the mylars have been received for signatures and the development agr:emuit is in draft form. Date. 4 Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions Plat Site yt Wih, Landscape �� - — ,❑ N(� )C+.)v1Mh;NIS--SI IBMI'I Ml'L;11ZS s _ City of FoA Conins 16. The date of preparation should be included. 17. '1wo (2) ties to section corners should be included. 18. Include an attorney's certificate that complies with the City's standards. 19. Provide statement(s) of ownership and maintenance of all tracts. 20. Include a certi Ilicate by the survevor as to the accuracy of the survey of the plat. N.D.P. Plan: Site and landscape Plan Comments: 21 . Both the site and landscape plans do not represent the proposed storm water facilities depicted on the utility plan. In particular, the I5" RCP pipe from the optional basketball court running through the parking lot with its outlet in the open area between the buildings. As well as the 15' RCP that conveys water along Raintree Drive. Also, then do not show the cross pans conveying water throughout the parking lot. 22. See comments 2,3A.5,7,9 & 10. Also see redlined comments on both the site and landscape plans. Date: Iow I ITFASI? SEND COPIES OF MARKED Signature: - - REVISIONS: PLAT 0- SITE EF UTILITY E[ LANDSCAPE PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: July 16, 1998 TO: s5gj.hof. PROJECT: #146-795 The Preserve Apts. Phase II, Raintree Master Plan - LDGS Preliminary All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, August 19,1998 1' G% C-Gdvioy Date: 0 —Zl �D CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS — PHt _ Site — Drainage Report — Otber U61ity — Redhe Utility— Landscape — Citv of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 28, 1999 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 4146-79T The Preserve Apts., Phase II-P/F LDGS PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: No Problems 9 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) All Plans and Supplements Included: © Utility Plan ® Site Plan © Landscape Plan © Proposed Plat Language General Comments: O See redline comments on all sheets of the utility plan. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Utility Plan Comments: Replat of Tract G (Raintree Com. P. U.D. Phase 11): O The following should be included as shown by redlines on the utility plan: o ROW dimensions o Sight distance easement • The Notes should include a comment about the 10-foot utility easement and the sight distance easement. • The City has "new" plat language that should be incorporated onto the plat. I have attached a copy of the new language for reference. • The off -site construction required for the driveway appoaches will have to be built within a temporary construction easement. "These easements will need to be coordinated between property owners and filed at the County. The City will need a copy of the easement agreement for record. If there are any questions give me (Mark McCallum) a call at 21211-6605. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Curre n� g DATE: 17 November, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 9146-79T The Preserve, Phase I1-Final P.U.D. (LDGS) PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEEI7;: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: 12/16/98 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) All Plans and SuDDlements Included: © Utility Plan © Site Plan © Landscape Plan 0 "Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines" © General Notes Handouts General Comments: W See redline comments on all sheets of the utility plan. More specific comments will be mentioned below. C�A soil investigation report should be submitted. Utility Plan Corments: Cover Sheet; Sheet I of I I. - Reference the current soils investigation. C�]=, The General Notes should be revised with the help of the General Notes Ilandout. 9 Provide the date under the Title (MM/YR) Replat of Tract G (Raintree Com. P. U.D. Phase II: X The following should be included as shown by redlines on the utility plan: • ROW dimensions • Vicinity map • Sight distance easement • Legal description ❑ The Notes should include a comment about the 10-foot utility easement and the sight distance easement. Utility Plan, Sheet 3 of I I: 9f Include a note pertaining to polywrapping of D.I.P. 9 Show the size and location of existing and proposed water facilities for the following: Taps, fittings, and valves. Also, show all curb stops and thrust blocks. K Show the length of pipe between all fittings and valves. 91 T'or the sanitary sewer show the type of pipe and manhole numbering. 91' See the "Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines" for street cuts. It will give some guidance as to where and how the cuts should be made and repaired. Grading Plan; Sheet 4 of 11: Show existing curb and gutter at the southern access. A Provide top -of -wall elevations for the retaining wall Storm Drain Plan and Profiles; Sheet 6 of ll: 1d. Indicate the type of curb and gutter that is being used. Street and Pavement Details; Sheet 8 of I I. v N Modified intersection detail to provide criteria for a driveway or use the standard driveway detail. N Modify the directional access ramp detail to adequately suit what is being proposed. The area does not have highback curbs for which this is based. 9 The access ramp details between the site plan and utility plan do not match. Although they both show painted cross -walks, the site plan appears to have a more elaborate detail than the utility plan. Horizontal Control; Sheet 10 of 11: �] The parking stall dimensions with a walk less than 6 feet should be 19 feet in length. A 17 -foot parking stall length with a two -foot overhang does not retain enough sidewalk width. ❑OThe detail for the southern access point is lacking. Show all proposed and existing curb and gutter as well as elevations (i.e. for the area around the retaining wall). The redlined comments made on the utility plan were before this comment. I think we can come to an agreement on the detail of both access points (especially the ` southern access) if and when we receive more detail. C� Include note indicating the type of curh and gutter installed, and for the easement arrangement. ❑O Show sight distance line. ❑O Provide ROW dimensions. Site and Landscape Plans: 3- , Is there going to be a sidewalk connection to the north of the optional basketball court`? ❑O The crosswalk detail appears more enhanced than what is shown on the utility plan. • I low does Phase 11 of the Preserve connect across Raintree Drive to the existing Preserve? • The parking stall dimensions with a walk less than 6 feet should be 19 feet in length- A 17-foot parking stall length with a two -foot overhang does not retain enough sidewalk width. ❑ As noted above the southern access point needs to show more detail. Also, the site and utility plan should be consistent with one another. ❑ The area within sight distance easements is restricted to the following: • Fences shall not exceed 42" in height and shall be of open design. If fences exceed 32" in height, they shall he constructed of split rail with a minimum dimension of 12" between horizontal members. • Berms, hedges, and shrubs shall not exceed 32" in height. • Tree plan!iing shall be restricted to deciduous trees only. The lowest branch of any tree shall be no less than 42" from grade. Date: �� Signature: I FASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: C}�L.AT ;-�UTIL,ffY 0-- ANDSCAPE REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 91 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #46-79S The Preserve Apts., Phase II -Preliminary LDGS PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: All Platul nel tided: 1. Utility Plan Sheets 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Site Plan 4. Landscape Plan General Comments: 0 See redline comments on all sheets of the utility plan. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Grading Plan; Sheet Cl: C Provide details for concrete pan, access ramps, and retaining \\all. 0 The parking stall dimensions with a walk less than 6 teet should be 19 feet in length. A 17-foot parking stall length with a mo-foot overhang does not retain enough sidewalk width. Utility Plan; Sheet C3: C Show the sidewalk culvert detail. O Represent the type -of -pipe for all service lines. C Provide a note the describes the blanket easement for the development. As well as all other casements. Preliminary Plat; Sheet C4: G The plat should depict the sight distance easements and utility easements alone Raintrce Drive. Site Plan: 13 is there going to be a sidewalk connection to the north of the optional basketball court? Landscape Plan: O The area within sight distance easements is restricted to the following: o Fences sha;il not exceed 42" in height and shall be of open design. if fences exceed ')'I" in height, they shall be constructed of split rail with a minimum dimension of 12" between horizontal members. o Berms, hedges, and shrubs shall not exceed 32" in height. o Tree planting shall be restricted to deciduous trees only. The lowest branch of am, tree shall be no less than 42" from grade. Date: Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions 1/�lat b- Site jXtility andscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT CON[MENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Curre n► g DATE: 19, August 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 4146-79S The Preserve Apts. Phase 11, Raintree Master Plan (LDGS) Preliminary PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received bv: 08/19/98 rl o Problems EIr Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments: In general, the proposed development is in the preliminary stages of review and as a result more detailed plans will need to he obtained in order to adequalelc review the ability of this proposed site to function with the surrounding area. • note: More specific comments are mentioned below. Utility Plan Comments: Show surrounding features for a minimum of 150 feet around the entire site. "]'his would include but is not limited to: all streets, sidewalks, existing parking lots, sanitary sewers. water mains, and storm sewers. 2. The centerline of the proposed primary access on Raintree Drive should align with the centerline of existing access road across Raintree Drive. 3. The area redlined along the eastern property boundary on the utility plan should correspond to the site plan. ]'he two plans are conflicting in potential use. as well as, they both do not clearly demonstrate how/where the sidewalk terminates/extends. 4. The drivewav near the trash enclosure is too narrow for a fire access lane. It must be a minimum of 20 feet. 5. The landscape plan and utility plan depict a 20 foot sewer easement along the southeastern boundary. The site plan depicts a 25 foot sewer easement adjacent to the southeastern property boundarv. The plat does not demonstrate either. 0. A detail sheet should be submit with reference being made to all details used throughout the utility plan. 7. Provide an area for the signature block on all sheets. The area should measure 3.5"X4.5". 8. The curb return radii dimensions should he indicated for the private driveways/accesses. I he City standards for curb return dimensions for a private driveway/access is a minimum ol' 15 feet. Also provide the dimensions for all accesses. A clarification of casements needs to he completed on the plat and at the time of next revisions all easements must be clearly labeled on the utility plan sheets. 10. Show the point of curvature elevations for the access along Raintree Drive. See redfincd marks at the access depicting all required elevations. 11. For the existing and proposed sanitary sewers depicted on the utility plan additional inRxmation should he provided such as the invert and top -of -pipe elevations, manhole numbering, type of pipe. and slopes of pipe. This should he done for al I water services, as well. 12. Provide a flowline curve data table including curve label, radius, angle, are length. and tangent length for Raintree Drive. 1 ). Plan must show complete horizontal street alignment including_ but not limited to: ROW dimensions. access ramps, and indication of all locations of outfall curb and gutter and Where transitions occur back to inflow curb and gutter. Plat: 14. The legal plat from the City files designates the entire Tract `G"from the Raintree Master Plan as a drainage, access, and utility easement, except the portion along Raintree Drive for the entire property frontage which is a 10 foot utility casement. The preliminary plat submitted does not designate Tract " G' in this way. This will need to he clarified. 15. It might be in the best interest of the developer to replat the tract. See the redlined comments on the preliminary plat for a replat option. Another replat option might designate the entire tract of land as a drainage, utility, and access casement except the building pads.