The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMOUNTAIN RIDGE FARM PUD THIRD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-04-25REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 15, 2000 TO: Technical Svs PROJECT: #18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 3rd Filing Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, September 6, 2000 ElNo Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** .--2-. S�Pee� VAgMPs 3, Lgb�e l rac,� I oh SAee� II e. h dGVkM,5F al))LleS, e p // The �ewtP U�3� �7 ��r� �vql esti'� Date: Signature:_ MTTYOU-W= RECEIVE COPIES OF REVMM _ site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape ♦ The sidewalk adjacent to the city park must be at least 6 feet wide. After talking with Craig Foreman in the Parks and Ree. Dept. he stated that he did agree with the removal of the existing sidewalk, but not the installation of a new 4-Coot sidewalk. ♦ Please sec the Traffic Operations comment letter for Traffic Impact Study comments. Utility Plan Comments Overall Utility Plan; Sheet 2 of7 ♦ Please show the bicycle / pedestrian paths, bridge structures, enhanced cross walks and 7-foot sidewalk along Troutman Parkway on the utility plans. Seneca Street Plan & Profile; Sheets 5 & 6 of 27 ♦ It has been brought to my attention that the Seneca Street design for this project does not tie-in to existing grades with the Seneca Street design for Westfield Park PUD. Wabash Street Plan & Profile; Sheet 6 of 27. ♦ The design for Wabash Street does not tie-in to existing grades with the design for Mt. Ridge Farms, I" filing. Troutman Parkway; Sheets 9 & 10 of 27: ♦ (Please go to the comments made above for the design of Troutman Parkway. Below will be comments specific to the design submitted with this round of review.) ♦ Please show the limits of construction in the plan & profile view. The approximate end of construction on the profile will require that a temporary grading easement be dedicated to tie-in proposed grades with existing conditions. In addition, where Troutman Parkway dead ends, the developer shall provide written approval from the adjacent landowner to discharge storm drainage Irom this development onto the adjacent land (Street Design Manual, Section 1.02.03.1 ?b). ♦ The minimum centerline radius for a collector street if 610 feet. ♦ Please provide a complete design for the bridge/ box culvert. Detail Sheets: Sheet 14, 15 & 16 of 16: ♦ Please show the cross section of the 10-fool cross pan for the intersection detail. ♦ Please provide a bridge/ box culvert detail for Troutman Parkway ditch crossing. ♦ Please provide an enhanced crosswalk detail. Plat Comments ♦ Please reference all of Mapping and Drafting comments. ♦ Is there a need to have a statement that vacates any pre-existing easements? ♦ Please make sure all tracts are labeled properly. ♦ Since the City Manager has to sign this plat, the repair and maintenance language should not be included on the plat. This language will be in the development agreement. Site and Landscape Plan ♦ Please make sure that the site and landscape plan are representative of the utility plan , and vice versa. PROJECTS COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plann:in2 DATE: August 15, 2000 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 3rd Filing Final- LDGS PLANNER: Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: September 6, 2000 General Comments ♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, site, and landscape plans. More specific comments will be mentioned below. If you have any questions please call me (Mark McCallum) at'_2I-6605. ♦ The sidewalk adjacent to Westfield Park must be at least 6 feet wide. The cross sections are showing the proposed correction to the 6-foot standard, but the plan views do not show the correction. ♦ Please see the Traffic Operations comment letter for Traffic Impact Study comments. ♦ Where Troutman Parkway stubs to future development, the developer shall provide written approval from the adjacent landowner to discharge storm drainage from this development onto the adjacent land (Street Design Manual Section 1.02.03.17b). The dedication of offsite easement to contain or convey storm would suffice, however, presently those flows have not been accounted for adequately (per Storm Water (itility). Utilitv Plan Comments Overall Utility Plan; Sheet 2 of 27: ♦ Please show all utility phasing. In particular all utility stubs. ♦ The utility lines east of the project. in Troutman Parkway should be "faded". Seneca Street Plan & Profile, Sheets 6 of 27. Date: tl�� r T- Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES !ILPLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS:' -SITE G-UTILITY NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS ,,MY LANDSCAPE ♦ It is my understanding the Seneca Street tie-in to existing grades is being revised with Westfield Park PUD (prior to completion of their 3" phase). The Engineering Dept. is agreeable to allow this project to go to public hearing, but will not sign off on utility plans for MRF 3�d until the "tie -id'/ revisions arc completed. ♦ Please show the design of the sidewalk on the west side of Seneca Street to Johnson Elementary School entrance. See redlines. Wabash Street Plan & Profile; Sheet 6 of 27. Troutman Parkway, Sheets 9 & 10 of27. Please show the limits of construction in the profile view. Please show all curb return elevations and stations. ♦ Please be clear about the phasing on this plan. In particular, where does the 12" water line end. Troutman Parkway Culvert Design; Sheet D-1 of Dd: ♦ Please provide more information, as redlined. Plat Comments ♦ Please reference all of Mapping and Drafting comments. Site and Landscape Plan ♦ Please make sure that the site and landscape plan are representative of the utility plan , and vice versa. ♦ The sidewalk system on the west side of Seneca Street does not show the 6-foot sidewalk required adjacent to Westfield Park. The sidewalk stub of the end of the southern cul-de-sac to Troutman Parkwav should correspond with the utility plans or vice versa. ♦ It might be to your benefit if you phase the landscape plans. COUNTY REFERRAL ili■ COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: December 7, 1999 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 3`d Filing Final- LDGS PLANNER: Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: January 5, 2000 General Comments ♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, site, and landscape plans. More specific comments will be mentioned below. If you have any questions please call me (Mark McCallum) at 221-6605. This project has certain obligations to the proposed bicycle/ pedestrian path and the associated bridge structure. As the result of negotiations with Mountain Ridge Farms, 2°d filing, '/s of the bicycle/ pedestrian path (the other % will be paid for by the City's Parks and Rec. Dept.) and associated bridge structure will be funded on a per lot basis for each lot approved on the Preliminary Mountain Ridge Farms, PUD. (All lots within the first filing, which is already under construction, were included in the over all fee.) The total fee for this subdivision is calculated as shown: 49 lots * $320/lot= $15,680. Please contact me (Mark McCallum) if a further explanation is needed. This project, as I am sure you are aware, is responsible to build Seneca Street to complete the connection to the north & south. I just want to reiterate that Westfield Park PUD, currently is only in construction phase I, which does not complete Seneca Street to the north boundary of this development. In the event that this project desires to proceed prior to Westfield Park PUD 2"' Phase, which will build Seneca Street to northern boundary of this development, this project will be obligated to construct Seneca Street to the where Seneca Street ends at construction phase I of Westfield Park PUD. (See Seneca Street comments below.) In accordance with 24-95 in the Municipal Code, the Developer is responsible to design and construct Trountjan Parkway adjacent to the development. The construction of-Troutman,Parkway shall Date: IUE4a PLEASE E D COPIES PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS: SITE �. UTILITY Signature: ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS I PROJECT Mw. COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: December 7, 1999 TO: Mapping/Drafting PROJECT: # 18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 3rd Filing Final - (LDGS) All comments :must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: January 5, 2000 **Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference** ltlel2� �2�� tiC Ov � a1z 1�ouN�� - I,cl�rNcss Cu2NL2J ore N� C(T),TE n_ 15 Th+U M ,Tr �(a 4I uT T RAcr M APPr_-AO-s 7D i'31 (�cr��c✓t� ao i'la01 Try PL -1 r SNu✓�a 1J0 2113E0, I Go/j FO3jNg1 W 4SA3, 4 ST, 13.E F 1« I s a q-T-, dc'E"li e- cc -A l p 1,= y CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT i l COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Cc11ins Current Planning DATE: December 7, 1999 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 3rd Filing Final - (LDGS) A11 comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: January 5, 2000 **Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference** n� (-ti!C, � APpo--J? -<-00 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS t' . _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort COMBS Current Plannine DATE: December 7, 1999 TO: Street Oversizing PROJECT: #18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 3rd Filing Final - (LDGS) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting;: January 5, 2000 **Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference** J/ L lGuJl "P CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 15, 2000 TO: Mapping PROJECT: #18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms, 3rd Filing Final PUD — Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, June 7, 2000 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) *"PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" A, 7- � 61J �fi cc T- T 5 o SHc�ti cry/ %lTtJ {%,o<r Fii uD / irt,,— Date: Signature:_ CHECK F0Eff-YOU'WISHT 'Plat site _ Drainage Report _ Other — Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape PROJECTS ems■ COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: May 15, 2000 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: # 18-92E Mountain Ridge Farms PUD, 3rd Filing Final- LDGS PLANNER: 'Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: June 7, 2000 General Comments ♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility, site, and landscape plans. More specific comments will be mentioned below. If you have any questions please call me (Mark McCallum) at 221-6605. ♦ '['his project will need offsite construction grading easements for the construction of Troutman Parkway and Seneca Street. The Stormwater Utility has stated that offsite construction/ grading easements are needed for the construction of the box culvert. In addition, this project will be required to dedicate rights -of -way for the construction of Troutman Parkway. ♦ A signature block for the ditch company should be on all utility plans sheets that show the ditch. ♦ Troutman Parkway should be design as follows (specific comments for the design provided in this submittal are below in the Utility Plan Comments): I . This project has vesting to build streets to the city's old street standards; therefore the design that is shown west of Wabash Street is sufficient. The applicant has even upgraded the width of the sidewalk from Wabash Street to Seneca Street to a 7-foot attached sidewalk for the safe route to school issue. However, the design of Troutman Parkway east of Wabash Street does not have vesting to the old street standards and will have to be built to the new street standards (Collector with Parking). Therefore, the city would like to have a meeting with the applicant to discuss the possibility of designing Troutman Parkway from Shields Street to Seneca Strcet to the new street standards. 2. Stormwater has stated that a preliminary basin design shall be provided for the Troutman Parkway design. Please contact the Stormwater Utility to talk about the specifics. 3. Please fade out the design of Troutman Parkway that is not to be built with this project. Date: < Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES f] PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS: 0 SITE UTILITY 1kLANDSCAPE ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS