The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLINCOLN CENTER ADDITIONS AND RENOVATION BLOCK 84 2010 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2010-08-04,.Forof t'Planning PO Box 580 " Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 * 970.224.6134 - fax DATE: November 20, 2009 TO: Susan Joy, Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Peter Barnes PROJECT COMMENT SHEET BASIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW LINCOLN CENTER EXPANSION 13,470 s.f. addition. Less than a 25% increase, therefore no site improvements are required by LUC Comments should be entered in DMS. Please return all comments to the project planner no later than DECEMBER 14, 2009 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) (Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _Utility _Redline Utility _Drainage Report _Other Landscape LM.68-ahs-0 Selected Issues Report Cli cif Tort coffins Date: 7/29/2010 Lincoln Center Expansion SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Engineering; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number:10 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] Technical Services was not routed a set of plans for their review. Please include them on the next round in order to receive their comments and redlines. Number:11 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] The plan sets are named incorrectly. The project title should be "Lincoln Center Expansion" or Lincoln Center Renovation" (pick one), followed by the correct legal address. Please see Tech Services if you have any questions. Please coordinate the correct project title among the plan sets so that they all match. Number:13 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [2/2/10] Some minor line over text labeling issues remain on the utility plans. The site and landscape plans are unscannable. Please correct all line over text and shading. Some lines are too thick and blur together and some are so light that they are almost illegible. Please see Jeff County in Tech Services if you have any questions. [12/15/09] Please see Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements, all plan sets. Number:14 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [3/19/10] This comment has not been addressed. Please correct all plan sets and keep in mind the 2' shy distance either side of the sidewalk. [2/2/10] Your variance request has been conditionally approved in that the circular planting areas across from the main entrance (NE corner of the property along Meldrum) must be configured in such a way to allow for good circulation both coming from and to the Lincoln Center and for north -south pedestrian flow. Please maintain the original 4.5' of sidewalk (minimum) clearance along Meldrum and arrange the landscaped islands either side of that. Please see Matthew Wempe in Transportation Planning or myself if you have any questions. [12/15/09] A formal variance request is required for the areas that are not in compliance with LCUASS 7-7L (typical local street section). A variance request was not received with this submittal. All private improvements within the public row require an encroachment permit and are approved during construction and cannot be shown on the plan sets as they are revocable. The city does not maintain or replace specialized concrete within row and will have to maintained by this development. Is this city owned property? Are you working with the DDA on these items? Or how are these issues being addressed? Number:16 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] Please provide tow and bow elevations on all walls (retaining, seat) and sidewalk chases where drainage is directed across the public sidewalk. Page 1 Number:17 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] Please dimension all existing sidewalks, row, easements (including labeling type), etc. See LCUASS and Appendix E4 for other required information. Number:20 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] All proposed walls over 3' in height (including the footer) will require design and a separate permit for construction. Please provide all tow/bow spots on both the Utility Plans and Landscape plans and label the Site plans with overall heights. Number:21 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] Per LCUASS and Appendix E4, all existing features within 150' of the property boundaries must be shown on all plan sets. We are typically most concerned with driveways, sidewalks and ramps so that we can see how your project is tying in with everything else. Number:63 Created:3/19/2010 Resolved [3/19/10] Please see Jeff County in Tech Services if you have questions regarding the scanning requirements in Appendix E6. Number:64 Created:3/19/2010 Resolved [3/19/10] Please coordinate all plan sets. Topic: Landscape Plans Number:18 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] See comments under General, Site and Utility Plans and coordinate the various plans sets. Number:19 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12115/09] Remove floor plan information. Show/label and dimension all utility easements and row's. Number:39 Created:2/2/2010 Resolved [2/2/10] Please see Jeff County in Technical Serves if you have any questions about the scanning requirements in Appendix E6. The plans are not scannable as shown. Please correct all line over text and shading. Some lines are too thick and blur together and some are so light that they are almost illegible. Number:40 Created:2/2/2010 Resolved [3/19/10] Now there is NO labeling. [2/2/10] Sheet LS102 is showing a 20' row easement. It can only be either, or but not both. Please correct and label as existing or proposed (typical). Please coordinate all easements and row dimensions and labeling so that they match on all plan sets (site, landscape, utility). Number: 60 [3/19/10] Please show and label all utilites. Number: 61 [3/19/10] Please remove contours. Number: 65 Created:3/19/2010 Resolved Created:3/19/2010 Resolved Created:3/19/2010 Resolved Page 2 [3/19/10] Please use greyscale for existing features and a dark lineweight for proposed. Some sheets use grey for the proposed and some sheets are using dark. Topic: Site Plans Number:62 Created:3/19/2010 Resolved [3/19/10] 1 did not receive a Site Plan so therefor, was unable to review it. Topic: Traffic Study Number:15 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] Please provide Engineering and Traffic Engineering a Traffic Study with the next round of review. Topic: Utility Plans Number:12 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] Please complete Appendix E4 and include with the next submittal. Please include all missing information on the plan sets. All items left unaddressed will become a new comment on the next round. Number:22 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved (12/15/09] Please add the street cut note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number:23 Created:12/15/2009 Resolved [12/15/09] Please provide sidewalk chase details (D10, 11, 12, or 13, whichever are appropriate), 701, 702, 1601, 1602, 1603, 1606, 1607. Please label all private details as "on -site" or "private". Page 3 Selected Issues Report City of Fort C 'Bins Date: 7/29/2010 Lincoln Center Expansion SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Technical Services; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County Topic: Floor/Elevation Plans Number:56 Created:2/11/2010 Resolved [2/11/10] The floor & elevation plans have numerous line over text & leader issues. Number:58 Created:3/4/2010 Unresolved [3/4/10] Plans A1.0 & A2.0 received in the 2/26/10 email, have line over text issues. If these plans are to be filed with the BDR, they will need to have the text "blocked out" in the hatched areas. Number:59 Created:3/4/2010 Unresolved [3/4/10] Plans A4.1A, A4.213, A4.3C & A7.1 received in the 2/26/10 email look good. Topic: General Number:45 Created:2/8/2010 Resolved [2/8/10] 1 estimate my comments will be made by Wednesday or Thursday. Topic: Landscape Plans Number:55 Created:2/11/2010 Resolved [2/11/10] The floor plan on the cover sheet of the landscape plans should really be a vicinity map. Topic: Site Plans Number:51 Created:2/11/2010 Resolved [2/11/10] Please add a legal description to the site plans. Number:52 Created:2/11/2010 Unresolved [2/11/10] The context plan on sheet LS101 of the site plans, could be reduced in size & moved to the cover sheet. Number:53 Created:2/11/2010 Unresolved [2/11/10] Is the zoning map on sheet LS101 of the site plans needed? Number:54 Created:2/11/2010 Resolved [2/11/10] The floor plan on the cover sheet of the site plans should really be a vicinity map. Topic: Utility Plans Number:49 Created:2/11/2010 Resolved [2/11/10] The benchmark "27-97" on the coversheet & sheet C1.0 of the utility plans, does not exist anymore. Please call the City Surveying Department @ 221-6605 or Technical Page 1 Services @221-6588, for an updated copy of the City of Fort Collins Vertical Control Network. Number:50 Created:2/11/2010 Resolved [3/25/10] There are line over text issues on sheets C2.0 & C2.1. [2/11/10] Sheet C2.0, C2.1 & C5.0 of the utility plans, have numerous line over text issues. Number:66 Created:3/25/2010 Resolved [3/25/10] Please darken the 'lighter linework" on sheets C2.0, C2.1, C3.0, C3.1 & C4.0 of the utility plans. Number:67 Created:3/25/2010 Resolved [3/25/101 Please darken the 'lighter" linework & hatching on sheets C5.0, C5.1 & C5.2 of the utility plans. Number:72 Created:4/15/2010 Resolved [4/15/10] **Per PDFs received via email on 4/13/10.** There are still some line over text & text over text issues on sheets C2.0, C2.1 & C3.1. These involve elevations. We feel that these elevations should be clear to read, and should be corrected. This could be corrected by just moving them, and extending the leaders. Page 2 L06.0ma Selected Issues Report Cate of Fort Collins Date: 7/29/2010 Lincoln Center Expansion SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Traffic Operations; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Topic: Traffic Number:36 Created:12/16/2009 Resolved [12/16/09] TIS provides that the additional SF is not expected to generate more traffic, but it doesn't discuss why. My prelim discussion with Matt brought out why and is acceptable to me, but it needs to be clearly provided in the TIS narrative also. I've contacted Matt requesting the TIS narrative be revised to discuss that aspect more clearly. Number:37 Created:12/16/2009 Resolved [12/16/09] Review, analysis and conclusions in the TIS are accepted and upon receipt of the revised narrative, the TIS will be accepted. Number: 38 [1/25/10] TIS is accepted. No further comments. Created:1/25/2010 Resolved Page 1 Ar Selected Issues Report C.IRV of Fort C"o ins Date: 7/29/2010 Lincoln Center Expansion SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Transportation Planning; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Jennifer Petrik Topic: General Number:1 Created:12/1/2009 Resolved [12/l/09]Non-standard enhanced sidewalk sections are acceptable with Transportation Planning, however ensure proper ADA width between planting areas. Mid blcok pedestrian ramps along east side of block are acceptable with Transportation Planning. Plans should be clearer where there are existing to remain and new to be built. Number:44 Created:2/8/2010 Resolved [2/8/10] Ensure Planter beds in sidewalk area have an edge that will be a visible and an adequate barrier during all weather conditions including snow. This edge should be designed so users including persons with disabilities, strollers and walkers do not inadvertently enter the planter beds when traveling to or past the Lincoln Center. Page 1