Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST RIDGE PDP NOVEMBER 2004 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-04-11Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Date: March 9, 2004 Project: EAST RIDGE ODP - TYPE 11 (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: March 10, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 5 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/041 Please provide a Legend identifying the various symbols and line weights. Number: 6 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/041 Identify only the Collector level streets and above. Do not show any of the local streets. Do not identify the ROW widths for the Collector streets as those requirements may change before this project comes in with a PDP. Number: 7 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/041 Show existing streets or access points to the west of Timberline. Any proposed street on this property will need to align with those existing to the west. Number: 8 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/041 Label the north -south street on the eastern boundary as a Collector in accordance with the Master Street Plan. Number: 9 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/91041 The separation distance between streets must be in accordance with LCLIASS, Table 7. Number: 10 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9104] If the shaded circle between Parcel M and R is supposed to represent a roundabout, you may want to leave this off the plan because it would take a minor amendment to remove it later should you change your mind. Number: 11 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] The TIS shows a future connection to Vine at the Eastern property line while the Site Plan does not. The TIS will need to be updated to account for this connection NOT being there. Number: 12 Created: 3/9/2004 [319/041 Show the street connections on the Whitham Property ODP and align your street connections with theirs. n Dal CHECK HE IF U WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape—*� �S Page I Number: 36 Created: 1 /13/2004 [8/24/04] [5/18/04] A change has been made to the requirements below. The trees will not be installed at this time along Vine and their costs will be included in the contribution in aid for the developer's local street portion. Please continue to show the trees on the plans but label the landscaping and utility plans that the trees will be installed with the Vine Drive Road Improvements. [3/19/04] [1/13/041 Engineering will require an interim and ultimate road design for Vine Drive. The TIS shows the need for a right turn lane from Vine to Greenfields in the long range. This project is responsible for dedicating the additional ROW and designing it in the ultimate design. This project is also responsible for construction of Vine Drive along their frontage, however, the City's Street Oversizing Dept prefers to construct the entire length of Vine when it's realigned at some point in the future. This project will only construct the sidewalk along their frontage and install the landscaping. A Contribution in Aid will be accepted for the nest of their local street portion. An estimate prepared by JR Engineering will be required prior to drafting the Development Agreement so that this amount can be added to the DA. Response: See Plant Notes IS through IS on landscape plan. Response: Ter meeting, owner has agreed to resoCce landscaping escrow issues within the development agreement Number: 91 Created: 1/16/2004 [8/24/04] [5/18/04] 13/18/04] Just keeping this comment alive until we do the DA. [1/16/04] Glacier Creek will not need to be constructed to the property line per the discussion at Staff Review, January 14th. Cash in lieu of will be accepted so that the street can be built at some point in the future. An estimate will be required from JR Engineering for the City's review and approval so that the dollar amount can be included in the DA. Response: ,Per meeting, owner lras agreedto escrow for that portion of Glacier Creekthat wilCnot needto he constructed Number: 92 Created: 1 /16/2004 [8/24/04] [5/20/041 [1/16/041 From Rick Richter/Pavement Management: Will need a mitigation plan for swelling soils in the pavement design. Swell consolidation testing should run at 500 PSF not 1,000. Response: GroundEngineering willsubmit an,4ddendutn to the 7raillteadPrehminary Soils Report once rough grading is complete. (,;round Engineering willperforrn swelCconsohdation testing at 200 (PSE for pavement design recommendations audvvirCaddressfooting design issues at that time also. Page 3 Number: 163 Created: 3/19/2004 [8/27/041 15/18/04] [3/19/04] Site/Landscape/Utility/Plat - please coordinate the comments given under the various topics so that all plan sets present the same information. Wesponse: JRrEngineering has attemptedto coordinate affplans. Number: 235 Created: 8/24/2004 [8/24/041 Access ramp shown in front of lot 3 at Campfire and Vine leads to nowhere. Please remove. response: tamp was placedforfuture Culde-,Sac across froth Got 9. Ramp has been removedfor clarity. Number: 236 Created: 8/24/2004 [8/24/04] A number of driveways are shown over storm inlets. This is not allowed. Response: (Daveway andinlets have been coordinatedso that there are no longercotrflicts. Number: 258 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04] Please dimension the Day Care parking lot stalls and drive aisles on the Site and Utility Plans. Response: (Dimensions added to plans. Topic: Greenfie/ds Arterial Number: 271 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/041 Looks good, just need the rest of the bridge design. See redlines for other minor comments. (Response minor comments have been addressedandcomplete bridge design is included Topic: Landscape Number: 125 Created: 3/16/2004 [8/24/041 [5/18/04] [3/16/04] Please see comments under General. Response We have leaned up the overlapping lanes and fabels as requested Number: 171 Created: 5/18/2004 [8/24/04) [5/18/04] Show and label all retaining walls. ,Response: detaining walls are now labeledon aflplans. Page 4 Number: 181 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/27/041 Repeat comment (this is just for the trees that would go inside the parkway. The rest of the plantings on site may go in with your project). [5/20/04] Place a note that all trees along Vine Drive will be installed with the Ultimate Vine Drive Road Improvements. Response: 'We hate added notes to the landscape pran —see Tiant Notes Xum6ers 15 t6rougr: 18, Topic: Plat Number: 65 Created: 1 /13/2004 [8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/16/041 If you are providing a ditch easement by separate document, then a note to the plat/utility plans will have to be added that includes the reception number of the separately recorded document. The easement will need to be recorded with the County before we can approve the mylars. [1/13/04] Provide a signature block for the ditch company. Response: 4he reception numberwill6e prozadedon the inyrar, this document is 6eing recordedthis wee( Number: 90 Created: 1 /16/2004 [8/24/041 [5/18/04] [3/16/041 Your response notes that the vacation is being done by separate document and that is ok, but the vacation will need to be filed and recorded with the County and the reception number placed on the plat/utility plans before we can approve the mylars. [1/16/04] Vacate the old ditch easement with the plat. Response: See response to#65. Number: 111 Created: 3/16/2004 [8/24/04] [5/20/04] Some of the tracts shown do not have an access easement - will you need this? [3/16/04] Please provide a tract table that includes what each tract is for, who owns it, and who maintains it. (&spouse: No. Page 5 Number: 133 Created: 3/19/2004 [8/24/041 [5/18/04] [3/19/041 See redlines for other comments. ,Response: Addressed Number: 189 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/24/041 All driveways must be shown for lots with 50' or less street frontage. [5/20/041 Show all driveways. Do not shade them, just an outline is fine. Wesponse.: Addressed Number: 259 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close. Number: 260 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/041 From Technical Services: Block boundaries must be delineated - show by separate line type and w/metes & bounds to describe. Response Addressed Number: 261 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04] From Technical Services: Reception numbers missing. tepponse: See response to#65. Number: 262 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04) From Technical Services: This is a nice looking plat. Good line and text. Wesponse: 7%tanks. Number: 263 Created: 8/27/2004 (8/27/04] From Technical Services: Plat is missing curve info. All curves must have 5 values shown. ,esponse: Addressed Page 6 Number: 264 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04] New policy effective immediately: All local intersections must be dedicated with either a 15' inside radius or a 15' chamfered corner to accommodate the new directional ramp design. All projects (even those currently in review) are affected. If the additional row dedication makes your lot too small to meet the land use code, then you may dedicate the additional area as a Public Access Easement. Response: ?10 charge reguiredo❑ this plat per City approvalof a compara6le detail See Susan Joy. Topic: Site Number: 121 Created: 3/16/2004 [8/24/041 [5/18/04] [3/16/041 See comments under General. Response. We have c/eaned up the overlapping fines andfabels as requested Number: 132 Created: 3/18/2004 [8/24/041 15/18/04] Note placed on Plat. Still need note on Site Plan. [3/18104] Please place a note on the Plat and Site plan limiting the "alley" loaded lots to rear access only and that no driveways allowed off the front. Response: See note on Site Plan. Number: 172 Created: 5/18/2004 [8/24/04] Much better but the cover sheet will not scan very well. Is there another option for the shaded areas;' Those usually don't scan at all or they come out as a blob. Sorry about that! [5/18/041 See Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. The cover sheet is illegible and will not scan. Please remove grading for clarity. Remove the utilities from all sheets. P,esponse:Wefiavefi,�edthecover sheet andremovedshadedareas—alsofi�,edvicinitymap. Number: 173 Created: 5/18/2004 [8/24/04] Please label the retaining walls. [5/18/04] Show and label all retaining walls. Response: La6eled Page 7 Topic: Utility Number: 143 Created: 3/19/2004 [8/27/041 Great job cleaning these up. Still missing a few lot corner spots, see redlines. [5/18/04] Repeat comment. In addition, spots must be provided at all lot corners (many are missing). [3/19/041 Grading sheets - these are unscannable in general and many spot elevations are illegible. Please rotate all labeling to the reader. fsponse: Alfredfinedfot cornergrades have been proTnded 7fiankyou. Number: 145 Created: 3/19/2004 [8/24104] Please show the underpass in all applicable profiles and label as "future". [5/20/041 Need to 'show the underpass in all profiles so that we can see how the utilities will work with it and that you are meeting the minimum cover requirements for both the utilities and the street. 13/19/04] Sheet 57, 58 - Put the numbers in the key map by the corresponding drawing. How will the storm design at Campfire and Vine work with the underpass? Response Zhuferpass is shown in ultitnate Vine,Drme 2reGminary Pran Set. Sheet 23 was added to show a Section and possible damage path. Vnderpass has been shown in Vine profiles. Number: 176 Created: 5/18/2004 [8/24/04] [5/18/04.1 Will need to show the street cuts into Vine for the utility connections. Please add the street cut note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. tesponse. Comment added to interim Vine (D ve plans. Number: 177 Created: 5/18/2004 [8/24/04] Full design has not been completed. Will need this before approving the development's mylars. [5/18/04] As discussed at conceptual and the first round of review, this project is responsible for the full design of the ditch crossing on the north side of the property as well as contributing 1 /2 their share of the costs of constructing it. All applicable notes, details, and structural talcs must be provided in the plans. Please see Young's Creek and The Lind Property for good example. An estimate will need to be prepared for the city's review and approval once the design has been completed and that amount will go in the DA. This project must also provide a complete design for the underpass at Vine with enough information so that it can be built in the field. Please see Lind and Young's Creek blue lines for good examples of the information that will need to be provided on the plans for the bridge or culvert and the underpass. Response: A fuf 6ridge design has been protndedevith the ggreenf eftfs offsite plans Page 8 Number: 178 Created: 5/18/2004 [8/24/041 Some of the retaining walls have been removed, but still need details for the ones now shown. [5/18/041 No retaining walls are allowed within the utility easement. Please provide a design and all necessary details, calcs for any and all walls over 30". Handrails (or fences) are required for any wall over 30". Response: ACC3retainiagwaCCsare locatedontCreSouthportion ofCampfire (Dr.andallwaCCsare 30"orress. Number: 190 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/24/04] There are still numerous problems with the reference labels and matchlines not matching up. [5/20/04] None of the match lines/sheet numbers match up on the street plan and profile sheets. Response: Attemptedto correct alCreference la6els andmatchlines. Number: 196 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/24/04] [5/20/04] Sheet 15 - Refer to detail and sheet # for all FES. See redlines. Response. Addressedredfines andreferenced allstortn structures. Number: 198 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/24/04] A number of plan and profiles show conflicting or missing information. [5/20/04] The information shown in the water/sewer/storm needs to match in both the plan and profiles. Response: Attempted -to coordinate alrpCan cT profr7es. Number: 200 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/24/04] Show the existing waterline in Vine and show how your line is tying into it. [5/20/041 Sheet 25 - show how the proposed water line ties into the existing. Response: 7fave shown interim cT ultimate connections on the onCy 12"or8"!he that willneedto 6e changed during ultimate. Number: 201 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/24/04] [5/20/04] Grading sheets - missing spot elevations on some lot corners. Response: 7fave added Cot cornergrades. Page 9 Number: 203 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/24/04] Information still missing. [5/20/04] Please provide curb return, inlet, and station equations on the street profiles. Also show the underpass, gas lines, etc where applicable. Response: Street 9(Ififesand,'Planshavebeenupdatedandarlredfinesaddressed Number: 220 Created: 5/25/2004 [8/24/041 Information on the existing line is not shown on the plans. [5/25/04] A portion of the waterline in Vine Drive may need to be lowered so that the connections coming in from the local streets are at the ultimate location. Response: lssuedaddressed iu prof7e. Number: 267 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/041 Lets get together the week of 8/30-9/3 to talk about the redlines and make sure we're all on the same page. I think we could go through the comments a lot faster just going through the plans real quick than to try type them all out. The plans overall are fantastic - we're just down to the last minute details. I also wanted to talk about coordinating the various sets (interim, ultimate, etc) and how to best do that. I have a suggestion but would like to talk it over with you first. Response: `We Gave met andworked together to resorve arfissues. Number: 268 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04] Please see the redlines and checklist E4 for additional comments. Please return the redlined checklist for Trailhead Utility Plans only, I do not need the others back. Response: 7rave rerietvedarfredfines andEa personarfy andfert teat comments Gave been tGorougGly addressed 7fave tried to contact 41W fakery numerous tines without a calf backto e.yress ourview that there is no erosion controfpfiasing needed Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz Topic: Genera/ Number: 231 Created: 8/19/2004 [8/19/04]Along Vine Drive any area where there is a cut in road elevation above the existing electric line must be potholed to determine the depth of the existing electric line. A 30" minimum cover must be maintained over the electric line. Please add a note to reflect this requirement. Response: Owner is aware of conditions and has agreed to reso(ve comments within the cDeveropment,4greenteut. Page 10 Number: 232 Created: 8/19/2004 [8/19/041 The existing vaults along Vine Drive will need to be relocated prior to the Interim Vine Road Improvements. A new electric circuit will need to be constructed along Vine before the existing equipment can be removed. New vaults will need to be installed at each entrance road to the: subdivision. These vaults will need to be placed far enough north to avoid any future elevation changes due to the final Vine Road Improvements. Final grading at each road entrance and horizontal and vertical control will be required. System modification charges will apply. 12,esponse: Owner fias been made aware of this issue andfias agreed to resoCve issue at rDevelopmentAgreement. Number: 233 Created: 8/19/2004 [8/19/04] The proposed bridge crossing at the north end of the project will need to accommodate electric conduit as part of the bridge design. Please coordinate with Light & Power. Response: rElectricalandotfierconduit fias 6een providedwitfi direction from City. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 241 Created: 8/25/2004 [8/25/04] No issues. Response: Noted 'ThankYou. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 1 /5/2004 [1/5/04] .Streets: Street names shall be verified and reviewed by the City Planning Department prior to being put in service. Note: Several street names are in question. Response: Noted 'YlankYou. Number: 10 Created: 1 /5/2004 [1/5/04] Addressing: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable.) Multi -family buildings more than one floor in height shall abide by the following addressing requirements: First -floor units shall be designated with 100's, second -floor units with 200's, third -floor units with 300's, and so on. Some multi -family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as the front side of buildings. A clockwise addressing pattern shall be maintained whenever possible. Note: An addressing scheme shall be submitted to the fire department for approval prior to being posted on the buildings. UFC 901.4.5; 901.4.4 , esponse: ;Noted rrhankYou. Page 11 Number: 11 Created: 1 /5/2004 [1/5/04] Water Supply/Commercial: No commercial buildings can be greater than 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway, Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1,500 gallons per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. If a fire hydrant cannot be provided, fire sprinklers shall be required. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 9Zesponse: Affstructures see in to meet this criteria and hydrants have been locatedzvithin Me maximum spacing envelopes. Number: 12 Created: 1 /5/2004 [8/25/041 Water Supply/Residential (Outside GMA): No residential buildings can be greater than 400 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 800 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 500 gallons per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. If a fire hydrant cannot be provided, fire sprinklers shall be required. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 �jZespon.se: `We feft that we have conformed to ibis requirement. Ifyou fi'ndt fiat xve haven't, pfease point out mftete and we tvifrgfaa7y fir problem. Number: 13 Created: 1/5/2004 [8/25/04] Fire Lane: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and be maintained unobstructed. The fire lane shall be platted as an "Emergency Access Easement" on the final plat. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.21 902.2.1; FCLUC ,tfsponse: `(tire do not krimuwhere afire lane is needed Pfease adtnse as to speck rotation. Number: 14 Created: 1 /5/2004 [8/25/04] Aerial Access: Buildings three or more stories in height must have access to a 30-foot unobstructed access roadway on at least one side for aerial operations. Note: Please submit proposed elevations (number of stories) for multi -family dwellings. PFA Policy 85-5 (B) rkesponse: We have no buihfing higher than 2 stories. Page 12 Project Comments Sheet 60a061i"'01�" Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Transportation Planning Date: March 18, 2004 Project: EAST RIDGE ODP - TYPE 11 (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: March 10, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Transportation Number: 14 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Please make sure the east/west collector street, where it intersects Timberline aligns with the primary entrance to the mobile home park on the west side of Timberline, unless a new mobile home access point to the south can be aligned with the east - west collector. Number: 15 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] The ODP needs to reflect the realignment of Timberline to the east as it approaches the railroad tracks. Number: 16 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] The eastern extension of International Blvd. needs to be shown on the southern boundary of the property with the intersecting streets from the proposed ODP. International should also be shown with an arrow as continuing eastward. Number: 17 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Why are there local streets shown on the ODP? Typically the ODP will identify collector and above classified streets. Please remove the local street designation since it is likely these will change as the parcels develop. Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report 1� Other Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Page I Number: 15 Created: 1 /5/2004 [8/25/041 Sprinkers: Fire sprinklers may be required. When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall off the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility, it shall be fire sprinklered. Note: Buildings that are fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fireline unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fireline. 1997 UFC 902.2.1 I�sponse: 7%oted 'Nis requirement doesn't seem to apply to ow su6mittal Number: 16 Created: 1/5/2004 18/25/04] Fire Alarm: A fire alarm system may be required for the day care center. Response: Xoted �ffiankjou Number: 17 Created: 1 /5/2004 [8/25/04] Knox Box: Poudre Fire Authority requires a Knox Box to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 1997 UFC 902.4. PFA Policy 88-20 Response: Toted `naak `You. Number: 18 Created: 1 /5/2004 [8/25/04] Hazardous Materials: This comment pertains to the club house and swimming pool. Corrosive, flammable, reactive or toxic materials (as defined in the Uniform Fire Code), if used, stored or handled on site, must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the fire department and Planning Department. FCLUC 3.4.5 (C) Response: Noted Thank You. Department: Police Topic: General Number: 234 [8/24/04] Issues resolved. Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Created: 8/24/2004 Page 13 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 242 Created: 8/27/2004 Please revise the basin widths in the SWMM model as per phone discussion and revise detention pond volume per model's new calculations. 9Zesponse: S` W" W basin tvidtGs and pondvolumes have been revised Number: 243 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide drainage easements on the lots where flows from upstream lots pas through. These drainage easements can be center on the lot line and need to be 10 feet wide as a minimum. �F,esponse: Drainage easements have been provided Number: 244 Created: 8/27/2004 A reminder that the: irrigation easement needs to be abandoned and all off -site easements signed before mylar signing. 9Zesponse: Comment rioted Number: 245 Created: 8/27/2004 Due to 3:1 slopes along the swale in the Waterglen development, a maintenance agreement will need to be included in the development agreement as well as the future HOA covenants. ,Response: Comment noted Number: 246 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide a plan view for all the lot grading templates (Type A, B, G, W) to better clarify typical lot grading. ,Response: 4'Can •rtteivs (cave 6cen provided Number: 247 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide typical alley cross -sections for all the different types of alleys on the plans. This is needed for drainage purposes to ensure the alley is built per the flow calcs in the drainage report. The width of the flow needs to be contained within the alley or drainage easements would be required for the lots where the flow encroaches, however no more than 3 lots can be affected in a row. rResponse: TypicafAry cross -sections have been providedfor alleys. qhe 7vidth of the flow is containedwithin the alley; therefore, no drainage easement is required Aease refer to calculations in drainage report. Page 14 Number: 248 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide a buried riprap detail. Response: Buried riprap detailhas been provided [Please refer to Sheet 94. Number: 249 Created: 8/27/2004 Please have storm sewer outlets at or near the toe -of -slope of the detention ponds. This reduces the risk of erosion even if riprap is provided. Response: Comment noted Outlets are in correct location. (Erosion is reducedvia riprap. Number: 250 Created: 8/27/2004 Please note a few storm sewer alignment concerns on the redlines. Additional clearance is needed in a few locations to allow for maintenance and/or replacement in the future. Response: Storm sewer alignments have been corrected to provide additionalclearance. Number: 251 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide a detention pond summary table on the drainage plan for the 2 ponds including volume req., volume provided, 100-year HWL, WQ water line, and WQ vol. provided. Response: A detention poudsummary table has been inctudedandis locatedon Sheet 49. Number: 252 Created: 8/27/2004 Please show that the ground water is below any storm sewer or provide water tight joints for all storm sewers within the groundwater. F,esponse: The ground water is 6eloio any storm sewer as shown in the soils report. Number: 253 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide a tract for the storm sewer located at the northwest part of the site that is located in an easement on two lots. See redlines. Response: Tract has been provided Page 15 Number: 254 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide cover for the storm sewer which is shown above ground on the profiles. See reclined plan. rZgsponse: Cover has been prornded Number: 255 Created: 8/27/2004 Please provide a trash rack detail with a maximum of 5 inch spacing between bars. Cross bars are recommended as well for child safety. Trash rack should be safe to walk on. 0(esponse: (Trash rackdetadhas been pro oded p'cfertoSheet 96. Number: 256 Created: 8/27/2004 There are some inlet and storm pipe conflicts with trees throughout the site. See redlined landscape plan. Please provide 10 feet separation between drainage structures and all trees. Response: Cm frcts reso(ved, see reisedlandscape plan Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 257 Created: 8/27/2004 1. The report is very general; it should describe in more detail what BMP's will be utilized where in which phase of construction. The plan contains phasing plan sheets, the report ant plans should address erosion control for these phases with individual plans for each phase if they are to be done separately. tesponse: Erosion controleffectmeness, rairrfallperfoimauce calculations anda construction sequence (Standard TorenO are providedinAppendi�G. Allerosioncontrol measures s(allbeinstalledperthe construction sequence andshallremain uutilallconstruction is completedforeach phase. 2. The report states that calculations, etc are to be found in Appendix H. I did not find this information there. The title page to Appendix G says Erosion Control, but the appendix contains rip rap calculations. I declined to look through the rest of the volume to try to locate the calculations required. 4esponse: 17he report was corrected to read `Appendi�,G". Calculations are includedin appe"diT_G. 3. Please provide a project schedule detailing what BMP's are to be utilized in what phases of construction (grading, concrete installation, etc.). Use Month 1, 2, 3, etc., not specific months (Apr Mar, Jun). l2espause: A construction sequence (Standard Form () is prmadedinAppendix G7 Page 16 4. Some of the symbols for BMP's on the plan are not consistent on the plan or with the legend. Please correct. P,esponse: Sym6o(s in the Cegendhave been corrected to matt( the p(an. Topic: Stormwater Number: 228 Created: 5/26/2004 [8/27/041 Please provide an off -site drainage easement for the outlet pipe for Pond A located at the southwest corner of the site. This easement needs to be 20 feet wide with the pipe centered in the easement. Response: Off -site drainage easement Gas been pro -tided Please refer to report for copy (,Weception #2004-0072260). Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Transportation Number: 237 Created: 8/24/2004 [8/24/04] There are numerous crosswalk ramps that lead to nowhere - meaning there isn't a ramp across the roadway to provide a full crossing. A few that I've spotted so far are: Sheet 90 of Utility Plans: Campfire at Vine, east side of Campfire - remove the ramp that directs pedestrians to the south (across Vine). There is no opposite ramp. Sheet 90 of Utility Plans: approx. 200' north of Vine, east side of Campfire - remove crosswalk ramp directing pedestrians to the west side of the street. This is an incomplete mid -block crossing. Sheet 90 of Utility Plans: just north of Bear River Ct. and Campfire. Remove the crosswalk ramp (see also sheet 83). Sheet 91 of Utility Plans: at Switchback and Camfire - remove N. crosswalk ramp on east side of Campfire. Sheet 91 of Utility Plans: Campfire/Greenfields - remove southern crosswalk ramp directing pedestrians to the west side of Greenfields (see also sheet 82). Sheet 81 of Utility Plans: Ultimate Vine/Three Forks - remove ramp to s. on east side of Three Forks. It leads to nowhere. Sheet 81 of Utility Plans: Ultimate Vine/Wagon Trail - remove ramp to s on east side of Wagon Trail. It leads to nowhere. Sheet 83 of Utility Plans: Wagon Trail/Campfire - Response: Xamps have been coordinatedwitb comments. Page 17 Number: 238 Created: 8/24/2004 [8/24/041 Sheet 83 of Utility Plans: Wagon Trail/Campfire - please add a ramp on NW corner that facilitates a complete e-w crossing of Campfire. Wfsponse: Added Number: 239 Created: 8/24/2004 [8/24/041 Sheet 81 of Utility Plans: Ultimate Vine/Greenfields - please add a ramp on NE corner that directs pedestrians south across Vine to the refuge provided in the median. (-�Csponse: Added We have returned all redlines. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 491-9888. Warm Regards, :�MA/ Timothy J. Halopo� Project Engineer JR Engineering Page 18 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Cit% of Port Collins Department: Engineering Date: September 28, 2004 Project: EAST RIDGE ODP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 29, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 7 Created: 3/9/2004 [9/28iO4] The plan does not clearly show the existing access point into Collins Aire Park. [3/9/04] Show existing streets or access points to the west of Timberline. Any proposed street on this property will need to align with those existing to the west. Number: 8 Created: 3/9/2004 [9/28/04] Do not name this street (unless matching into an existing named street) or you'll have to amend the CDP to change it if you change your mind later. [3/9/04] Label the north -south street on the eastern boundary as a Collector in accordance with the Master Street Plan. Number: 9 Created: 3/9/2004 [9/28/04] Your response letter indicated that you will meet this requirement at the PDP stage, however, we require it to be done at the ODP level. Your street separations must be in accordance with the land use code and table 7 of LCUASS and shown on the CDP now. Showing streets that do not meet the minimum or maximum separation distances at the CDP would seem to indicate approval, which we cannot give at this point. [3/9/04] The separation distance between streets must be in accordance with LCUASS, Table 7. Number: 12 [9/28/04] [3/9/04] Show the street connections your street connections with theirs. CHECK Plat Utility Created: 3/9/2004 on the Whitham Property CDP and align - 9 zq q_ Dar U WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Site Drainage Report Other Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 November S. 2004 Mr. Bob Barkeen Current Planning Department 281 N. Collette Avenue P.O. Box 550 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Project: East Ridge Response to City Comments, Overall Development Plan JSD Project No. 1894.3 Dear Bob: LANDSCAPE aRc ITECTcRE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHIC DEIGN We have received comments from City of Fort Collins staff, dated 10/01/2004, regarding our submittal for the EAST RIDGE Overall Development Plan (ODP) - TYPE II (LUC) and have incorporated responses to the comments in our resubmittal (two copies -one for Engineering and one for Current Planning) attached with this letter. Following is our narrative response to each of the comments in italicized text. Department: Engineering Topic: General Number: [3/9/04] Issue Contact: Susan Joy Created: 3/9/2004 Show existing streets or access points to the west of Timberline. Any proposed street on this Property will need to align with those existing to the west. [9/28/041 The plan does not clearly show the existing access point into Collins Aire Park. Response: The existing access road into Collins Aire Park has been clearly delineated in this resubmitted ODP. Number: 8 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Label the north -south street on the eastern boundary as a Collector in accordance with the Master Street Plan. [9/28/041 Do not name this street (unless matching into an existing named street) or you'll have to amend the CDP to change it if you change your mind later. Response. The referenced collector was identified on the previous ODP as Delozier Drive based on a comment from Transportation Planning; it has been removed from this resubmitted ODP. Number: 9 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] The separation distance between streets must be in accordance with LCUASS, Table 7. [9/23/041 Your response letter indicated that you will meet this requirement at the PDP stage, however. we require it to be done at the ODP level. Your street separations must be in accordance with the land use code and table 7 of the LCUASS and shown on the ODP now. Showing streets that do not meet the minimum or maximum separation distances at the ODP would seem to indicate approval, which we cannot aivc at this point. Response: The resubmitted ODP has been modified so that separation distances betiveen streets will be in accordance ivith LCUASS, with the understanding that no local roads are to be depicted on an ODP. ,Moreover, conversation with Current Planning Staff indicates that Section 3.6.3 governs street pattern and connectivity standards and allows the applicant at the PDP stage oJ'site design to either rneet the L' PROP CT I ILESLANIA N94 mment_Rc,,nx_I I. Is )4.,1 Mr. Bob Barkcen November 3. 1004 standards (which includes langttage in 3.6.3(E): "... unless rendered infeasible by unusual topographic features, existing development or a natural area or feature ") or to request alternative compliance. The presence of a wetland along the southern edge of the property will affect access to International Blvd; the presence of a proposed grading easement far a potential grade -separated crossing at Timberline/Vine l affect access to Timberline Road. and the presence of the existing railroad tracks still affect access to Vine Drive. Number: 13 Created: 3/9/3004 [9/28/041 [3/9/041 Show the street connections on the Whitham Property ODP and align your street. connections with theirs. Response: The connection to the proposed east -west collector through both properties was included with the om-tinally submitted ODP. The location of the proposed alignment of International Blvd as depicted on the Whitham ODP was submitted with the previous ODP. The northern most collector and the extension of the Delojer Drive (north -south,) collector from the middle of the property northward to the northern most collector have been deleted by the City per its East Mulberry Corridor Plan. Other connections points between the properties will be from local road to local road. The Whitham ODP included no local roads, but shorted potential local road access points from the East Ridge proper ,. At this time, no local roads have been designed on the East Ridge property. Redline drawin.-s have been returned with this resubmittal. Thank you for your review of this letter and the resubmittal ODP materials. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any reason. Sincerely, .JINI SELL DESIGN, INC. Kent Bruxvoort, P.E. Project Manager cc: George Hart, Progressive Living Structures, Inc. A01 I J.PVUJ�]'LWDA 1Y t.;Wn'101 T(. �mx He e_Ile iN kl. d�I Project Comments Sheet Lwboma)n Selected Departments C ih of Poll { ollmn Department: Engineering Date: November 24, 2004 Project: EAST RIDGE ODP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Bob Barkeen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 24, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 3/9/2004 [11/23/04] All future intersections along International Blvd and the future collector street must be shown at the ODP and in accordance with LCUASS, table 7. Your response letter states that this has been changed on the drawing, however, the drawing has not been changed and the previously shown intersection east of the lake is still shown with this submittal. This location exceeds the maximum separation distance of 660' from Delozier Drive and would require a modification to the Land Use Code. [9/28/041 Your response letter indicated that you will meet this requirement at the PDP stage, however, we require it to be done at the ODP level. Your street separations must be in accordance with the land use code and table 7 of LCUASS and shown on the ODP now. Showing streets that do not meet the minimum or maximum separation distances at the ODP would seem to indicate approval, which we cannot give at this point. [3/9/04] The separation distance between streets must be in accordance with LCUASS, Table 7. Signature _ Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page I Number: 19 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/91041 Please label the north/south collector (Delozier) situated on the eastern edge of the property from International Blvd. to the east/ west collector. Number: 20 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Please be aware that as PDP proposals are submitted more detailed analysis of the transportation system and impact analysis maybe required, which may lead to off site improvements as identified in the ODP's TIS. Page 2 September 9, 2004 Mr. Bob Barkeen ' Current Planning Department 281 N. College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Project: East Ridge Response to City Comments, Overall Development Plan JSD Project No. 1894.3 Dear Bob: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING GRAPHIC DESIGN We have received comments from City of Fort Collins staff regarding our submittal for EAST RIDGE Overall Development Plan (ODP) - TYPE II (LUC) and have incorporated responses to the comments in our resubmittal attached with this letter. Following is our narrative response to each of the comments in italicized text. ISSUES: Department: Advance Planning Issue Contact: Pete Wray Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 2/23/2004 [2/23/041 East Mulberry Corridor Plan/Master Street Plan: Street alignment - Future collector street at Timberline Rd. shall be aligned with primary entrance to Mobile Home Park to west. - Local street between parcel F and H should align with local street round -a -bout connecting to south (see redline comments).. - SE corner of property (parcel T) show minor arterial street. - show future Timberline re -alignment ROW (east of existing alignment). Response: The originally submitted ODP did align the east -west collector with the primary entrance to the Collins Air Park at Timberline Road. In interdepartmental discussion with City of Fort Collins staff (Transportation Coordination meeting of March 18, 2004) it was confirmed that this alignment is preferred. With this resubmitted ODP the roundabout has been removed, as well as all local streets. The potential future right-of-way associated with a grade -separated crossing of Timberline over Vine, shifted eastward to account for the Plummer School, has been depicted on this resubmitted ODP. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen Topic: General Number: 13 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/041 A neighborhood meeting will need to be held for this project. This meeting will need to be held prior to a determination that the project is defined as "complete". Response: A neighborhood meeting was held on Wednesday evening, June 23, 2004. Topic: Stormwater Number: 25 Created: 3/24/2004 [3/24/041 Streets will need to align with the Witham ODP immediately west of the site. Response The east -west collector depicted in the previously submitted ODP aligned with that shown in the Whitham ODP to the east. We have removed the local roads with this resubmittal, but have added the expected International Blvd alignment, which is consistent with the Whitham ODP. Additionally, a north- 153 W�ST MOUNTAIN AVENUE FORT COLUNS,COLORADO 80524 P970.484.1921 F970.484.2443 INFWAMSELLDESIGN.COM 11MSELLDESIGN.COM Mr. Bob Barkeen September 9, 2004 Page 2 of 5 south collector, to be located along the property line between the two projects, is depicted with this resubmitted ODP. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 5 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Please provide a Legend identifying the various symbols and line weights. Response: We have provided labels and leaders for each of the symbols and lines used in the drawing. Number: 6 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Identify only the Collector level streets and above. Do not show any of the local streets. Do not identify the ROW widths for the Collector streets as those requirements may change before this project comes in with a PDP. Response: Only collector level streets and above are included this resubmitted ODP. Local streets have been removed and ROW widths are not identified. Number: 7 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Show existing streets or access points to the west of Timberline. Any proposed street on this property will need to align with those existing to the west. Response: The two existing access points from Collins Aire Park to Timberline are depicted on this resubmittal. The proposed east -west collector as depicted is consistent in location with the East Mulberry Corridor Plan, with the Whitham ODP, with the existing southern access point to Timberline from Collins Aire, and with the preferred connection point to Timberline per the Transportation Coordination Meeting of City staff on March 18, 2004. Number: 8 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Label the north -south street on the eastern boundary as a Collector in accordance with the Master Street Plan. Response: The above -referenced street has been labeled as a collector. Number: 9 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] The separation distance between streets must be in accordance with LCUASS, Table 7. Response: Site design during the PDP process will consider and be in accordance with street separation criteria in the Street Standards, Table 7, or with approved modification as site constraints may dictate. Number: 10 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] If the shaded circle between Parcel M and R is supposed to represent a roundabout, you may want to leave this off the plan because it would take a minor amendment to remove it later should you change your mind. Response: Depiction of a roundabout has been removed from this resubmitted ODP. Number: l l Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] The TIS shows a future connection to Vine at the Eastern property line while the Site Plan does not. The TIS will need to be updated to account for this connection NOT -being there. PE TROIECT PILSV AND\I894}\do&GDPC.nu RcaP onx N 08, 4 &a Mr. Bob Barkeen September 9, 2004 Page 3 of 5 Response: The TLS (February 2003) depicted a now out-of-date site plan in Figure 3 that allowed for the possibility of access to Vine Drive. However, all of the site -generated traffic calculations considered no access to Vine Drive (see Figures 10 through 13). No update to the TIS is required. Number: 12 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Show the street connections on the Whitham Property ODP and align your street connections with theirs. Response: See the response above to Comment 25. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: Natural habitats and features buffer standards Number: 4 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Comments are not available at this time. Natural Resource comments will be forwarded to the applicant under a separate cover. Applicaht's Note: Comments were received from Natural Resources on April 12, 2004 addressing general concerns, wetlands, and raptor nest buffers. A modification request for a 300 foot raptor nest buffer was prepared by the applicant on June 1, 2004 and Natural Resources responded to the modification request on June 30, 2004. The comments presented below are for general and wetlands comments from the April 12, 2004 letter and for raptor nest buffers from the June 30, 2004 letter. Comments on the Overall Development Plan General: Provide to the NRD for its approval a buffer encroachment diagram including encroachment calculations. Contact Doug Moore for examples and additional information. Response: A buffer encroachment diagram has been included with this resubmitted ODP. Wetlands • The wetlands buffer distance needs to be shown and labeled from existing wetland, not the proposed. NRD will consider adjusting the buffer to distance around as long as the viability of the feature is not compromised. Please review with Doug Moore prior to the next submittal. Response: A 100 foot buffer line around the existing wetlands is depicted on this resubmitted ODP. • NRD will consider the loss of portions of the existing wetland, provided that mitigation for this loss is created within the proposed wetland buffer zone. If a loss occurs, a wetland mitigation plan will be required at PDP. Response: So noted. Comments on the Modification of Standard Topic: General Number: 3 No Issues. The Natural Resources Department agrees that by reason of extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to the East Ridge property, that strict application of the buffer zone standards would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties, and exceptional hardship upon this property owner. As a result to these circumstances the Natural Resources Department supports the request for modification of the 1,320-foot buffer zone standard required for an on -site hawk nest pursuant to sections 3.4. 1 (A)(2)(d) and 3.4.1(E) of the Fort Collins Land Use Code. 1i ETROJECT FILESVLANDAI8943Vd.c ODPCa.,,Rcs,on 0 O&Wd.c Mr. Bob Barkeen September 9, 2004 Page 4 of 5 Response: On July 22, 2004 the above -cited modification request for a 300 foot radius buffer from the existing hawks nest was presented in a public hearing to a hearing officer. The request was approved on August S, 2004. Notes regarding the modification are included on this resubmitted ODP. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 3 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Until specific site plans are submitted, previous comments for this project which was submitted under the 'Ryland" project still pertain. Additional requirements may be required once specific site plans are submitted. Response: So noted. Department: Police Topic: General Number: 22 [3/10/04] No comments at this time Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Created: 3/10/2004 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 23 Created: 3/10/2004 The release rate for the site is the 2-year historic rate, not twice the historic'rate. See redlined drainage report. The Boxelder Creek/Cooper Slough Basin Master Plan states this criteria and would override any ditch agreement. Response: The ODP Drainage Report prepared by TST has been modified accordingly. Number: 24 No other comments for the ODP. Created: 3/10/2004 Department: Transfort Issue Contact: Garold Smith Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 3/2/2004 [3/2/04] Appears that integration of future transit service has been addressed. Response: So noted. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Transportation Number: 14 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] Please make sure the east/west collector street, where it intersects Timberline aligns with the primary entrance to the mobile home park on the west side of Timberline, unless a new mobile home access point to the south can be aligned with the east - west collector. Response: See response above to Comments 1 and 7. Number: 15 Created: 3/9/2004 [3/9/04] The ODP needs to reflect the realignment of Timberline to the east as it approaches the railroad tracks. =a E.\PROJECT FILES\LAND\IP9a 3\dots\ODPC.'n _Rn,.._09.08.N dac STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Citc'ol Fort Coll in, City of Fort Collins 9/15/04 Mr. Bob Barkeen 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 JR Engineering has addressed your comments for TRAILHEAD PDP - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the following responses: ISSUES: The actual fence design will need to meet the requirements of Section 3.8.11 of the LUC Wssponse: °Ihe fencing on the rear Cot lines along Greenfiehls Drive meets the Code. 'The offset is 8 feet. The fence type most likely wifffie either the five- foot orsi�, foot high typicaffence. In addition to articulating the rear lot lines, we have also incorporatedshru6s in sections to help soften the fookandprovule visualinterest. Parking lot screening will need to be provided or the day care parking lot (along Yule Trail Drive). Street trees are also missing from the day care, swimming pool detail sheet. Response: We have addedadditionafshru6s at the Tule7raddriveway entrance. Street trees are shown on Sheet 3 of 8. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: East Vine Drive Interim Number: 213 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/27/041 [5/20/041 See redlines for other comments. Wysponse: Addressed all runes Number: 269 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04] Add the street cut note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. , esponse: Addednote Num6er 6. Q?§ads as statedabove. Topic: East Vine Drive Ultimate Number: 211 Created: 5/20/2004 [8/27/041 [5/20/04] Please see comments under the Trailhead plans where applicable. &sponse: Reviewed7raiC7feadPlansandcoordinateda!lsets. Page I Number: 265 Created: 8/27/2004 [8/27/04] Corrections to lines 11 and 23 of the General Notes req'd. Response: Corrections made to Ones 11, 23 d 34. Topic: General Number: 29 Created: 1 /13/2004 [8/24/041 [5/18/041 [3/16/04] The ditch easements can be filed by separate document but the reception number of the separately recorded document will need to be noted on the plat and utility plans. However, the ditch company may need to sign off on the utility plans if any grading is being done around their ditch. Please see comments from Stormwater. [1/13/041 The ditch company will need to sign off on the plat, site and utility plans. Please provide the appropriate signature blocks. Response: Reception inau6erRni(fbe plottedmt mylac Signature 6lockhas 6eert providedongrad)rg sheets andon corers f overall ut ility construction set. Number: 31 Created: 1 /13/2004 [8/24/04] The plans have been cleaned up nicely, however, there are a few scanning issues that remain (overlapped labeling, etc). [5/18/04] [3/16/04] The plans (site/plat/utility/landscape) are not scannable. Please see Appendix E6 for minimum font sizes, etc. Please correct all overlapped labeling. [1/13/04] See Appendix E6 for scannability requirements. Please correct all overlapped labeling. Response: Have tried to catch all overlapping errors and remedy all scannability issues. Number: 35 Created: 1 /13/2004 [8/24/04] Please ,provide more information at the possible future underpass at Vine. Need to show how the drainage works and that that location will work with the utilities. Need to show the underpass in all plan and profiles. [5/18/041 [3/19/04] Please provide the ultimate design for the underpass in accordance with LCUASS. Includes all necessary notes, details, structural talcs, etc. See examples given for Young's Creek and Lind Property. [1/13/04] A grade separated crossing is required where the future bike trail crosses Greenfields. This project is responsible for the design and possibly the construction of this underpass. Please coordinate with Craig Foreman in Parks Planning. Response: Sheet number 23 of 23 has been added to dearly show possi6Ce future underpass andprelvminary drainage route. 'Underpass also shores up in allprofifes where applicable. Page 2