Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMILLER BROTHERS FOOTHILLS SIXTH REPLAT PART OF TRACT A KING SOOPERS FUELING STATION - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2009-11-30Selected Issues Report t:Ity of mart Coll ins Date: 11 /27/2009 KING SOOPERS FUELING CENTER PDP TYPE I SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Engineering; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number:25 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Legal description for ROW dedication was submitted by email however the review fees and deed of dedication have not been provided. Legal does not match Utility Plan regarding bearings and distances shown. Please revise the legal (or plans) to match and submit the revised legal, deed of dedication and $250 review fee with your next submittal. [12/31/07] At the June 18 Conceptual Review meeting, it was stated that new additional ROW dedications would be needed for both Taft Hill and Elizabeth. 57.5 feet from centerline and 42 feet from centerline respectively. Based on the scale 1=20 shown on the plan, it does not appear that enough ROW exists and no new ROW is being proposed ??? A 15 foot utility easement must also be dedicated behind the new ROW. Please see the redline comments. Number:26 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [12/31/071 The new concrete detached sidewalk must be a minimum of 6 feet wide and located in the ULTIMATE location at the new ROW. This may require additional off -site ROW or access easement dedications to get the new sidewalk to tie back into the existing sidewalk at both ends. Number:27 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [12/31/07] New ROW and easement dedications may be made by a replat or by separate document. If done by separate document, the City will collect a $250 review fee per document. No additional fee is collected if done by Plat. Number:28 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Same - Incomplete submittal. Only Sheet 4 was resubmitted. [12/31/07] The Landscape, Lighting and Elevation plans should be seperated from the Utility Plan set. They are filed seperately. Please revise the index on the cover sheet. A detail sheet will be required at the final compliance review stage. Number:29 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Same - Only sheet 4 was resubmitted. Incomplete plan submittal. [12/31/07] Two City of Fort Collins bench marks are required on the plans. Please provide this information on the cover sheet. Number:30 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Same - Incomplete resubmittal package. Page 1 [12/31/07] Please use the standard General Notes (1-48) from L.C.U.A.S.S. Appendix E. Available online. List all variance requests under note 48 (i.e. driveway - intersection seperation etc... ). Number:31 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [12/31/07] Please submit a variance request letter signed and stamped by a licensed C.E. for the driveway/intersection seperations shown. See LCUASS Table 7-2 for min. requirements for spacing. Number: 32 Created: 12/31 /2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Same - only sheet 4 was resubmitted. [12/31/07] Please provide the standard indemnification statements on the cover sheet (provided with redlines). Please add all consultant info on the cover sheet (i.e. Traffic Eng, Geotech, Architect etc...). Number:33 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Same [12/31/07] Please label in bold print FOR REFERENCE ONLY on the bottom right corner of sheet 2. Number:34 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Same [12/31/07] Please see the redlines, Sheet 4, regarding ROW & Easement dedications and sidewalk location and width requirements. Number:35 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [12/31/07] No water or sewer service connections being shown on the Utility Plan ?? Number:36 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [12/31/07] Please call out the new access driveways with the LCUASS standard DWG 707 showing truncated domes at both sides. Max driveway width is 36 feet. No cross walk striping required at the access driveways. Max cross slope is 2 percent for pedestrians. Number:37 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] 1 will defer to Stormwater regarding detntion or water quality requirements. [12/31/07] No stormwater detention/water quality being shown. From previous meetings and the conceptual review meeting I was under the impression that at a minimum, some water quality detention would be required, maybe in the parkway strip, if not on -site. It appears all drainage is surfaced drained directly to the street through the access driveways ?? I will defer to stormwater for comments regarding drainage detention requirements on this site. Number:38 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [4/1/08] Same [12/31/07] Please add a standard signature block to sheet 5. Number:39 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved [12/31/07] Please revise the Site and Landscape plans to reflect changes made on the Utility Plan set with respect to ROW and sidewalk improvements. Number:40 Created:12/31/2007 Resolved Page 2 [12/31107] The PDP Transportation Development Review fee was not fully paid. In addition to the base fee of $2000, an additional calculated cost of $250 per gross acre for the site should be included. Please provide this additional calculation and payment with your next submittal. Number:75 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] Only Sheet 4 of the Utility Plan set was resubmitted for review. This was discussed by telephone with Galloway. My review of sheet 4 only has been completed however all other comments on the remaining sheets will be carried forward. Please resubmit a complete revised set of Utility Plans with your next submittal. All comments clouded in green are carry-over repeat comments. All comments clouded in red are new comments. Number:76 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] The PDP submittal TDRF fee was under -paid by $250. Please submit a $250 payment prior to scheduling a hearing. Number:77 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] A ROW dedication legal description was emailed to me for review. A review fee of $250 must be submitted as well. The bearings and distances on the legal description do not match those shown on the Utility Plan set. Please revise to match and resubmit the revised legal description with completed and signed deed of dedication. I can provide you with the dedication template in a Word document by email on request. Send request to rmaizland@fcgov.com. Number:78 Created:4/1/2008 Unresolved [5/20/08] A letter of intent for the cross lot access arrangement and temporary construction easement are needed prior to scheduling a hearing for this project. [4/1/08] Please submit a signed letter from Cedarwood Plaza (prior to scheduling a hearing) indicating that they are OK with the cross lot access arrangement proposed on the plans on the NW corner of the parcel. Number:79 Created:4/1/2008 Unresolved [5/20/08] The monument sign is still shown in the ROW. No signs will be permitted in the ROW. Please also see Zoning department comments from Peter Barnes. [4/1/08] Monument signs may not encroach into the new ROW area. Please pull these signs out of the ROW limits. Number:80 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] Please label and call out both of the new driveway cuts per LCUASS DWG 707. Call out the radius at the driveway. Number:81 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] The sidewalk being shown on the plans will be considered and INTERIM sidewalk since it will need to be removed and replaced when the street is widened in the future. If you wish to construct this sidewalk in the INTERIM location you will also be required to escrow funds for the future ULTIMATE sidewalk. Please provide an engineers cost estimate for the removal of the interim walk and the construction of a new 6 foot ultimate walk for review. This payment will be provided in the development agreement and will be due at the time of building permit. If you do not wish to escrow money for an ULTIMATE sidewalk you must construct it in the ultimate location with this project (at the new ROW line). Page 3 Number:82 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] Please place a note on the Utility Plan that states that all interim improvements within the ROW are subject to the terms and conditions of the development agreement. The temporary use of the ROW for the fuel station will be outlined in the development agreement language. Number:83 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] Please call out the ped ramps on the Utility Plan sheet with the LCUASS standard detail. Including detail for truncated domes. Number:84 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] All LCUASS typical construction details must be provided at final compliance submittal. All detail sheets shall include all applicable LCUASS details for ROW construction and should be located at the end of the plan set with signature blocks. Be sure to use the latest 2001 adopted LCUASS details. Number: 85 Created: 4/1/2008 Resolved . [4/1/08] Please clearly show/label and dimension the existing and new proposed ROW on the Utility Plan sheet. Number:86 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] Please label the sidewalks - Tie back into existing walk — at both ends and call out the radius for the transitions. Number:87 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] Some of the text is too small to read on the Utility Plan sheet. Please enlarge. Number:88 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] Clearly show and label existing or proposed water and sewer service connections on the Utility Plan sheet. Number:89 Created:4/1/2008 Resolved [4/1/08] See redline comments on the Site & Landscape Plan. Be sure that any revisions to the Utility Plan sheets are also reflected on the Site and Landscape Plan sheets. Number:95 Created:5/20/2008 Resolved [5/20/08] Please add "Utility Plans For" on the cover sheet over the tile for the Utility Plan set. Number:96 Created:5/20/2008 Resolved [5/20/08] Please add (For reference Only) to the Index for the ALTA survey. See redlines for clarification. Number:97 Created:5/20/2008 Resolved [5/20/08] Please remove variances number 2 and 3 from cover sheet General Note 48. The lighting is a modification to the Land Use Code processed by Planning and not a part of the Utility Plan set. Number 3 will not be permitted by the City. The monument sign must be removed from the ROW. See redlines. Number:98 Created:5/20/2008 Resolved Page 4 [5/20/08] The plan shows a small portion of the canopy structure overhanging the new ROW dedication. No part of a structure is permitted to encroach into the ROW. Please revise the plans accordingly. Number:99 Created:5/2012008 Resolved [5/20/08] Please add the City's standard street cut note to the demolition plan and utility plan sheets. I have provided this note in the redlines. Number:100 Created:5/20/2008 Resolved [5/20/08] Please call out all curb opening/chase drains with the LCUASS standard detail and provide the detail on the detail sheet 6 of 6. Number:101 Created:5/20/2008 Resolved [5/20/08] Please add the City standard signature block to sheet 6 - details. Number:102 Created:5/20/2008 Resolved [5/20/08] An overpayment of $250 was made. I believe this was a result of the confusion on the ROW dedication by separate document. We can apply this "credit" toward the easement review fee that is necessary for the off -site cross lot access arrangement and associated off -site improvements. An email was sent to Matt regarding ROW and Easement dedications on 5-20-08. Number:109 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please submit a signed deed of dedication and legal exhibits for ROW on Taft Hill and Elizabeth as reviewed and approved by the City Attorney regarding deed language. Number:110 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please submit an off -site temporary construction and public access easement signed deed of dedication and legal exhibits for the cross lot access being constructed into the King Soopers parking lot area. Number:111 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please revise the title block on the utility Plan set to match the title at the top of the cover sheet (Typ). See redlines for clarification. Number:112 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] The project title does not need to be provided at the top of every sheet in the utility Plan set. You may leave it if desired but it is not prefered. Number:113 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please enlarge and use bolder text for the Alta Survey FOR REFERENCE ONLY designation in the bottom right corner of the sheet. Number:114 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please show all proposed asphalt cuts as perpendicular intersecting lines. Radius cuts are not likely to happen. Number:115 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please remove note 28 from the access ramps shown on the driveways. The ramps will be constructed per the driveway detail 707 and not 1606 or 1607 which are to be used at the street corner only. The driveway ramps should utilize the curb option rather than Page 5 a flare option on the back side. See redlines for clarification. Show curb rather than flare on the plans. Number:116 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] The driveways are called out with 20 foot radius but it is not drawn correctly on the plans. Please show the driveway radius correctly at 20 feet continuous from back of sidewalk to flowline. See Detail 707 and redlines for clarification. Number:117 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please remove the horizontal groove lines from the H.C. ramps at the intersection corner. Groove lines should not be tooled into the ramp as this is no longer the standard. Only truncated domes are necessary per the LCUASS detail. Number:118 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please correct all line over text conflicts on the Grading Plan sheet. See redlines. These conflicts do not meet scanability requirements of LCUASS Appendix E. Number:119 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] The Cut-off wall being used to keep water from draining/seeping under the street section on Taft Hill should be extended in at right angles on both ends for at least 3 feet. See redlines for clarification. Number:120 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Please specify some method of sealing the joint between the top of the cut-off wall and the curb & gutter section so that water cannot infiltrate through the joint. See the detail on the bottom of sheet 5 for clarification. Number:121 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] See scanability comments on Detail Sheet 6. Additionally, the sidewalk chase drain detail 709 was revised and updated 2007. Please use the updated detail and also insert City of Fort Collins Stormwater Detail D-10 on the detail sheet. I can provide you with this detail if you do not have access to it. Topic: Technical Services Number:122 Created:11/26/2008 Pending [11/26/08] Minor line over text conflicts should be corrected. See redlines provided. Page 6 Selected Issues Report city of loll Collins 11 /27/2009 KING SOOPERS FUELING CENTER PDP TYPE I SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Transportation Planning; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Transportation Planning Topic: General Number: 103 [5/20/08] No Comment Date: Issue Contact: Denise Weston Created:5/20/2008 Pending Page 1 Selected Issues Report Citi of Fort Collins Date: 11 /27/2009 KING SOOPERS FUELING CENTER PDP TYPE I SELECTION CRITERIA: Department = Traffic Operations; Status = All ISSUES: Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Topic: Traffic Number: 51 Created: 1 /7/2008 Unresolved [10/28/08] No landscape plans received since previous comment. [1/7/08] Site landscaping must meet City Engineering sight distance standards. Page 1