HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINEWOOD PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2009-03-13`' AT 7 FEBRUARY 84 " % E '� hMt Edr
dA
t�
RiEN'
32-79B PINEWOOD PUD Preliminary &Final
CITYOF FORT COLLINS P.O. BOX 580. FORT COLLINS COLORADO 80522 (3031484-4220
February 23, 1984
Mr. Tom Dougherty
220 East Mulberry
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Dear Tom,
The staff has reviewed the application for preliminary and final PUD approval
of the Pinewood Amended PUD and would offer the following comments:
I. No large trees should be planned in the water and sewer easement.
Garages must be setback at least 10 feet from the existing water
main.
2. All existing and proposed easements should be indicated on the site
plan. If there are existing easements to be vacated, these will
need to be approved by the City Council. It is suggested that all
space outside of the building envelopes be dedicated as "utility
easement" on the final plat.
3. Provision of wheel stops on parking spaces should be indicated on
the site plan.
4. The title of the site plan should be "Pinewood - Amended PUD". Please
revise.
5. The words "private road" should be deleted from the site plan as
well as "Kingswood Drive". Units will be addressed off of either
Stanford or Stover streets.
6. The building located directly south of the large open s-pace area
appears to be outside the 150' fire access requirement. Please clari-
fy.
7. Building envelopes should not be shown on the plat unless they are
also lots in which case the area of each lot must be shown.
8. The dimensions of the existing four-plex should be indicated on
the site plan.
9. All signs must comply with the sign code.
10. The energy conservation standards which are indicated in the notes
on Sheet 1 of the site plan should be detailed.
Dougherty Letter
V23/81 - Page 2 14me ,,
Ae
11. Exterior colors and materials should be indicated on the building
elevations. Also, elevations of garages should be indicated.
12. The site plan should provide for attorney's certification. Also,
there is revised wording for the owner's signature block.
13. Site plan should show existing vegetation in the 150' area informa-
tion.
14. Screening treatment of trash areas should be indicated.
15. The building data should include number of units in each of the
building types.
16. The landscape plan should indicate number of decidious shrubs and
coniferous shrubs being utilized.
17. Minimum sizes of decidious trees do not appear to conform to the
City's minimum requirements. Please revise.
18. The staff would suggest additional tree and shrub plantings along
Stover Street and Stanford Street. Also, low lying plantings in
addition to trees in parking islands is recommended. See me for
details. The landscape plan should indicate what "hatch marked" areas
are intended for.
19. The staff questions the points you have taken on the Density Chart.
On Monday, March 19, 1984, 812" X 11" PMT reductions of all plans, colored
renderings of all plans, signed mylars of the site plan, landscape plan and
subdivision plat and a signed "Site and Landscape Covenants" should be de-
livered to this office.
I would recommend we meet as soon as possible to discuss the above comments.
Revisions to the plans reflecting the above comments should be delivered
to this office no later than Friday, March 2, 1984. If you should have any
further questions, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
j
Joe Frank
Senior) City Planner
JF/kb
CC: onnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator
XMauri Rupel, Development Center Director