Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS FILING NO. 2 - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-23PROJECT i..� COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planningz DATE: July 20, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #36-96F Mulberry Lemay Crossing Phase 3 PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: S U�G'l/1 August 22, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference I. LEGAL Di;5C2IP7'1e111 Oa) AAL1'01E'CT PLfi/l IRvES 49-r /bATCN TI16 97dlO�'�-Y LENIRY CQoSS n1Ca jRA-r. 2 - ptt�iG%ed 'FIa14 13 t,o+ -�L �f` 1 le I ( AGO rd e j r)RJ- Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 7, 2001 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96F KFC/Taco Bell at Mulberry-Lemay Crossings, Phase Three — Type 11 (LUC) 4Mc K H. Plat Utility All comrnents must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: November 28, 2001 No Conunent Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" Site _ Drainage Report t Redline Utility Landscape Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments CitV of Port Collins Department: Engineering Date: December 3, 2001 Project: MULBERRY LEMAY CROSSING, PHASE 3 PDP - TYPE II (LUC #36-96F) All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: November 28, 2001 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Checklist 70 See checklist, Appendix E-4, for further comments. Topic: Cover Sheet 18 Provide two project bench marks. See attached, item #40 of Appendix E-1, General Notes. Repeat Comment. (General Notes shown are the old version - will need to update). See attached. 19 Reference the updated or current soils report. See attached, item #19 of Appendix E-1, General Notes. Repeat comment. 60 Update the General Notes, fill in items 19 and 20. See attached or go to www.co.larimer.co.us to download the current Appendix E-1. You may have to go to two sheets to get all the notes to fit. Topic: Erosion Control Plan 68 Sheet 4 - What is the thick, bold line representing? Topic: General 11 Please show the existing features and phasing between the 2nd filing & your projects (all sheets) in a ghosted or alternate line weight, each sheet. Expand the legend on each sheet to include the different line weights. It is still unclear what your are constructing and what will be constructed "by others" - where does your project start and where does 2nd filing end? Repeat comment. A, / CHECK HER# IF "U WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ X/ Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility _ t Redline Utility �_ Landscape Page I Topic: Grading Plan 67 Proposed contours must tie into the existing contours for a minimum of 50' beyond the project limits. Topic: Landscape Plan 74 Trash Enclosure area does not match the Utility Plans. 78 Coordinate the redlines from the Utility Plans. Topic: Overall Utility Plans 26 Expand Legend - Show Property, ROW, easement lineweights. Repeat comment. See redlines. 31 Update all details on Detail Sheet to current LCUASS details. Repeat comment. Provide details 7-20A, 7-208, 16-2, 16-4D, 25-1. Note: If the 2nd filing improvements are not in at the time your project goes to construction, then other details will be required at the time you resubmit plans to address phasing. 61 Various dimensioning on sheet 2, see redlines. All entrances, radii, etc, must be labeled and/or dimensioned off the centerline and/or property line. 62 Sheet 2 - If the temporary asphalt sidewalk exists at the time your project goes to construction, then it must be removed and replaced with the permanent concrete sidewalk. Add a note that ties the new concrete sidewalk into the temporary ashalt sidewalk on the lot to the south. 63 All "by others" work must be shown in a ghosted lineweight to clearly show the difference between what your project includes and what it doesn't. IF the "by others" work is not complete by the time your project goes to construction, then you will have to submit plans showing what improvements your project will be required to complete in order for your project to function. The Development Agreement will state that KFC/Taco Bell will be responsible for all incomplete improvements necessary for your building to function prior to the issuance of the building permit. 64 Sheet 2 - Where does your project pick up the curb and gutter and where does the "by others" leave off? Same comment on lineweights applies. 65 Remove striping plan from Magnolia and Lemay Avenue, all sheets. 66 Sheet 2 - See redlines for question on lower left hand corner. What does this line represent? 76 The sidewalk on the south side of the property must be included and built with your project. Line up the sidewalk with the sidewalk to the east. Topic: Plat 75 Comments from Technical Services: No Plat included? Is there one and do we need to see it? Page 2 Topic: Site Plan 69 Trash enclosure area does not match the Utility Plans. 71 Ghost the 2nd filing improvements to distinguish between the two projects. Repeat comment. 72 Correct overlapping label - see redlines. 73 Provide a Legend. Repeat comment. 77 Coordinate the redlines from the Utility Plans. PaP 3 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 7, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #36-96F KFC/Taco Bell at Mulberry-Lemay Crossings, Phase Three — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: November 28, 2001 11 ❑ No Conunent �L Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** f , /Jo PLr 4-F iNew7 15 TNEP-E on)E f,4a2> no "E n1EED To sE� 1T? DAW HERE IF YOU WISH TO RI C IPW site _ Utility _ Red = Utility — Drainage Rgod _ Ofer — landscape of .v - s ,,ch, t.kton., ,,, Matthew Pridemore Architekton 398 S. Mill Ave. #301 Tempe, AZ 85281 Ph: (480) 894-4637 Fx: (480) 894-4638 December 10, 2001 Ted Sheppard Chief Planner Current Planning 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Mr. Sheppard, I am writing in regards to the KFC/Taco Bell project at the Mulberry/Lemay Crossings development. This letter is in response to your written comments dated 12/4/01 and are as follows: L The attached "General Notes" have been added to the site plan. Please see Sht I of 4. 2. The site lighting plan has been revised to match the light levels for Filing Two. Please see Sht. El. 1. The site lighting note has also been added to the general notes found on the site plan. Please see Sht. I of 4. 3. The signage note has been added to the general notes found on the site plan. Please see Sht I of 4. 4. A parking space at the end of the aisle has been striped to provide a turn -around point for cars at the end of the parking lot. 5. The east -west sidewalk has been aligned with the crosswalk to the east. The cross -walk has been angled to account for the shift. Please see Sht. I of 4. 6. While there were no comments regarding the exterior elevations, copies have been provided as a courtesy. Hopefully, this letter along with the accompanying revised plans has adequately addressee all of your questions and concerns. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call at (480) 894- 4637. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Matthew Pridemore Architekton Account Manager 398 5 MIII Aye, 301 Tempe, AZ BS281 . �I 450 894 4638 1 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: December 18, 2001 Project: MULBERRY LEMAY CROSSING, PHASE 3 PDP - TYPE II (LUC #36-96F) All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: December 19, 2001 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General 11 Please show the existing features and phasing between the 2nd filing & your projects (all sheets) in a ghosted or alternate line weight, each sheet. Expand the legend on each sheet to include the different line weights. It is still unclear what your are constructing and what will be constructed "by others" - where does your project start and where does 2nd filing end? Repeat comment. 12/19/01 - Repeat comment, third round. Getting better but the Landscape, Site and Utility plans are still not clearly showing what this project includes and what belongs to second filing For instance, the Site and Landscape Plans show the sidewalk along South Lemay and Magnolia in a darkened line weight. This implies that you are constructing the sidewalk with this project, when in fact, these improvements are part of the 2nd filing. Please ghost all improvements that are NOT part of this project. Topic: Grading Plan 84 Move the labeling to where it can be read. See redlines. Typical, each sheet. 85 Delete "Future" and "(by others)" from the 8' concrete walk note. This sidewalk connection must be constructed with this project. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plan 86 Ghost the 2nd filing improvements to distinguish between the two projects. Repeat comment. See comment under "General". CHECK. n Date WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Utility x Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Other Topic: overall Utility Plans 26 Expand Legend - Show Property, ROW, easement line weights. Repeat comment. See redlines. 12/19/01 - The Roadway Centerline is incorrectly called out in your Legend. Plans show it differently. Please correct, all sheets. Why two different utility easement line weights? Also, the ghosted 9' utility easement shown on the plans should not be ghosted. It should be the normal line weight. See redlines. 61 Various dimensioning on sheet 2, see redlines. All entrances, radii, etc, must be labeled and/or dimensioned off the centerline and/or property line. 12/19/01 - Repeat comment. Still showing some radii not called out. 62 Sheet 2 - If the temporary asphalt sidewalk exists at the time your project goes to construction, then it must be removed and replaced with the permanent concrete sidewalk. Add a note that ties the new concrete sidewalk into the temporary asphalt sidewalk on the lot to the south. 12/19/01 - Repeat comment. Please add the note. See redlines. 63 All "by others" work must be shown in a ghosted line weight to clearly show the difference between what your project includes and what it doesn't. IF the "by others" work is not complete by the time your project goes to construction, then you will have to submit plans showing what: improvements your project will be required to complete in order for your project to function. The Development Agreement will state that KFC/Taco Bell will be responsible for all incomplete improvements necessary for your building to function prior to the issuance of the building permit. 12/19/01 - Just keeping this comment alive. All improvements not constructed by the 2nd filing at the time this project goes to construction will then become the responsibility of KFC/Taco Bell. Plans must then be resubmitted showing revisions/phasing. 64 Sheet 2 - Where does your project pick up the curb and gutter and where does the "by others" leave off? Same comment on line weights applies. 12/19/01 - Please 'show the "by others" curb and gutter, all sheets, as noted in the legend. See redlines. 79 Detail Sheet: Remove the old "additions to existing sidewalks" detail. This is shown in the new 25-1 that you've already added. 82 See sheet C-2 redlines. How will these ramps on the south side pedestrian sidewalk tie into the landscape area. Might want to use a curb or flare option. 83 Sheet C-2: Remove the grading layer. Topic: Site Plan 71 Ghost the 2nd filing improvements to distinguish between the two projects. Repeat comment. Page 2 73 Provide a Legend. Repeat comment. 80 Remove the bubbling around changed items. 81 Use a ghosted line weight for all sidewalk & street improvements that are NOT part of this project. Repeat comment. Page 3 12/19/01 - Just keeping this comment alive. All improvements not constructed by the 2nd filing at the time this project yuc, to construction will then become the responsibility of KFC/Taco Bell. Plans mv=+ then be resubmitted showing revisions/phasing. 2/6/2 - Anwei ,u your question on plans.... yes, this refers to public improvements sucn as utilities and emergency access - anything that would be required for your project to funct;on. 03 Add the sign required in comment #88 and 92 and show/label on plans. 96 Ads. _ ,,unalure block for Boxelder Sanitation District, sheets C-1 and C-2. Add the ��-O signature block to sheet C-1. 97 Update the plans to reflect what's been installed already. The water and sewer main lines, curb and gutter from pc to pc, and the drive aisle have been constructed. Change the line weights to ghosted for these items to show that they are existing. Ha,the water and sewer lines been stubbed out to the propertv line? If so, ghost those features where they exist and only bold what this project will be installing. If not, show that you will be cutting into the drive to make those connections and show the approximate area of construction. Clean outs need to be at the 90. See redline. Page 2 PROJECT i■�� COMMENT SHEET City of FDA Collins Current Plannime DATE: July 20, 2001 TO: Transfort PROJECT: #36-96F Mulberry Lemay Crossing Phase 3 PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 22, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference &4ayL��� Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS A _Plat _-§ite _Drainage Report Other iil _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape city of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet S City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: February 5, 2002 Project: MULBERRY LEMAY CROSSING, PHASE 3 PDP & FC - TYPE II (LUC #36- 96F & G) All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 06, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Overall Utility Plans 62 Sheet 2 - If the temporary asphalt sidewalk exists at the time your project goes to construction, then it must be removed and replaced with the permanent concrete sidewalk. Add a note that ties the new concrete sidewalk into the temporary asphalt sidewalk on the lot to the south. 12119101 - Repeat comment. Please add the note. See redlines. 21612 - Repeat. Please add note. See Site Plan for good example. Topic: General 89 Fill out and submit the information sheet for the Development Agreement. Please see attached. To speed things up a little bit, you can return it by fax at: 970-221- 6378. Z 6 Z. Dare CHECK I)EAE j OU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Si a Drainage Report Other_ I Utility __ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 z.. Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: October 15, 2002 Project: MULBERRY LEMAY CROSSING, PHASE 3 PDP & FC - #36-96F & G) All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 09, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Site Plan 92 See comment #88 under Zoning Department which states "I assume the hatched space at the northwest corner of the parking lot is to address the "dead end" parking issue that I raised earlier. They need to add a note to the plan to indicate what It is If indeed it Is a space that will allow people to turn around, then they must provide a raised sign stating something to the effect "no parking - to be used for turnaround only". Peter Barnes/Zoning Department Add a sign as required and show on the Site Plan. Topic: Utility Plans 62 Sheet 2 - If the temporary asphalt sidewalk exists at the time your project goes to construction, then it must be removed and replaced with the permanent concrete sidewalk. Add a note that ties the new concrete sidewalk into the temporary asphalt sidewalk on the lot to the south. 12/19/01 - Repeat comment. Please add the note. See redlines. 2/6/2 - Repeat. Please due note. See redlines and the Site Plan for good example. 10/9/2 - Repeat. See sheet C-2 redlines. Add note: Tie new concrete sidewalk into existing. 63 All "by others" work must be shown in a ghosted lineweight to clearly show the difference between what your project includes and what it doesn't. IF the "by others" work is not complete by the time your project goes to construction, then you will have to submit plans showing what improvements your project will be required to complete in order for your project to function. The Development Agreement will state that KFC/Taco Bell will be responsible for all incomplete improvements necessary for your building to function pnor to the issuance of the building permit. D , 1i Da[ CIIF,CKA4VREIF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _� Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility _� Redline Utility Landscape Page I <� Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Port Collins Department: Engineering Date: November 13, 2002 Project: MULBERRY LEMAY CROSSING, PHASE 3 PDP & FC-#36-96F & G) All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 09, 2002 Nolte - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Site Plan 92 See comment #88 under Zoning Department which states "I assume the hatched space at the northwest corner of the parking lot is to address the "dead end" parking issue that I raised earlier. They need to add a note to the plan to indicate what it is. If indeed it is a space that will allow people to turn around, then they must provide a raised sign stating something to the effect "no parking - to be used for turnaround only". Peter Barnes/Zoning Department Add a sign as required and show on the Site Plan. Topic: Utility Plans 62 Sheet 2 - If the temporary asphalt sidewalk exists at the time your project goes to construction, then it must be removed and replaced with the permanent concrete sidewalk. Add a note that ties the new concrete sidewalk into the temporary asphalt sidewalk on the lot to the south. 12/19/01 - Repeat comment. Please add the note. See redlines. 2/6/2 - Repeat. Please add note. See redlines and the Site Plan for good example. 10/9/2 - Repeat. See sheet C-2 redlines. Add note: Tie new concrete sidewalk into existing. 63 All "by others" work must be shown in a ghosted lineweight to clearly show the difference between what your project includes and what it doesn't. IF the "by others" work is not complete by the time your project goes to construction, then you will have to submit plans showing what improvements your project will be required to complete in order for your project to function. The Development Agreement will state that KFC/Taco Bell will be responsible for all incomplete improvements necessary for your building to function prior to the issuance of the building permit. 12/19/01 - Just keeping this comment alive. All improvements not constructed by the 2nd filing at the time this project goes to construction will then become the responsibility of KFClraco Bell. Plans must then be resubmitted showing revisions/phasing. 7 i Signatare Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat __ Site Drainage Report Other Utility __Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 216/2 - Answer to your question on plans.... yes, this refers to public improvements such as utilities and emergency access - anything that would be required for your project to function. 93 Add the sign required in comment #88 and 92 and show/label on plans. 96 Add a signature block for Boxelder Sanitation District, sheets C-1 and C-2. Add the ELCO signature block to sheet C-1. Page 2 PROJECT (iw tr COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current PlanninE DATE: November 26, 2003 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96I MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: December 17, 2003 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference Nance (please print) Cl IECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other. Utility Rcdlinc Utility _Landscape 1!!I Project Comments Sheet mmk " Selected Departments Citv of Fort Collins Department: Transportation Planning Date: December 16, 2003 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT PDP -TYPE II(LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: December 24, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: General Number: 8 Created: 12/16/2003 No comments on the parking lot. -/(-�7-C)3 .ems Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ _ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Transportation Planning Date: December 17, 2003 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT -TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: No Review Date Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Transportation Number: 18 Created: 12/16/2003 Will there be an accessible handicap (HC) route from the HC parking stalls in front of the future building`' It would be appropriate to identify an accessible route before the asphalt is poured so that the crosswalks and access ramps can be built in a manner consistent with the entire site (see red lines for suggested route). Number: 19 Created: 12/16/2003 Will the curb be installed in front of the future building adjacent to the proposed Home Depot? Number: 22 Created: 12/17/2003 There will need to be a walkway installed along the south side of the drive aisle, 6' minimum, which aligns between the Home Depot and the future building, per the original plan. This will also accommodate the ADA accessible route issue in comment #18 (see red lines). Number: 23 Created: 12/17/2003 Further clarification is needed on how a person can walk from the front of Home Depot to the future building through the contractor loading area. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat l Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet N Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: December 19, 2003 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: No Review Date Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: site plan Number: 17 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/ 16/03] The site plan needs to clearly show what is being approved and to be built by this project. Everything is shown in the same line weight. Topic: utility plans Created: 12/16/2003 Number: 8 [ 12/ 16/031 see checklist for missing/needed items. Number: 9 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/ 16/031 Need to show the existing improvements as dashed. Number: 10 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/16/03] The walls and iron picket fence need to be located at least 2 feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. This may impact the parking stall layout/dimensions in a couple of areas. Number: 11 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/ 16/03] The wall at the northeast corner of the driveway being relocated needs to be modified so that pedestrians can be seen by cars approaching the street and it is not a blind corner. Number: 12 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/ 16/031 Neither the screen wall or the columns for the screen wall can extend into the site distance easement. From the drawing it appears that the columns are encroaching into the easement. Number: [12/16/031 building sitg. 13 Created: 12/16/2003 Need to clarify what is going to be built and what is proposed for approval in the area around the future n� i �Z/� GJ Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat X Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility -�,_ Redline Utility `< Landscape Page 1 Number: 14 Created: 12116/2003 [12/16/031 Need to see a plan where the building envelope and the easements are shown. Need to know if the building is encroaching into any easements and will help to define the limits of the vacations that are needed. Number: 15 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/ 16/031 The private storm line can not run within the public easements. Number: 16 Created: 12/16/2003 112/16/03] See Plans for additional comments. Number: 30 Created: 12/19/2003 [ 12/19/031 Combine the utility plans for both projects into one set. Number: 31 Created: 12/19/2003 [ 12/ 19/031 For areas of easement vacation, I need a drawing / sketch with dimensions showing the areas requested for vacation so the requests can be routed to the utilities for review. I emailed Jon at Galloway Romero the information/ forms regarding the easement vacations and dedications. Number: 32 Created. 12/19/2003 [ 12/ 19/03] Add a note on the utility plans with the approximate limits of street repair for the driveway removal and new installation going out to the centerline of the roadway. The note should read as follows: Approximate limits of street cut/ mill and overlay if pavement is disturbed. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repair to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Page 2 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Stormwater Utility Date: December 19, 2003 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: December 17, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Drainage Letter Number: 34 Created: 12/19/2003 (12/19/031 The letter provided as a drainage report is insufficient. Please provide calculations showing what the assumed basins' flows from the newly developed areas were from the previous studies and what the actual flows are. Document that the assumed flows from these basins will fit within the pond volumes as designed with the Mulberry Lemay First Filing plans and later modified with Building I re -grading of the pond and the addition of the retaining walls. Topic: Drainage Plan Number: 37 Created: 12/19/2003 [12/19/031 Please provide a drainage plan that calls out all basins, and includes a hydrology summary table nper City requirements. Number: 38 Created: 12/19/2003 [12/19/03] Plans are confusing, need to show what is existing and what is proposed in different line thicknesses, it is no clear from what was submitted what is being built by this project.t Topic: Erosion Control Number: 33 Created: 12/19/2003 [12/19/031 Plan needs notes, BMP's, calculations, etc. Provide erosion control calculations in the report. Topic: Floodplain Comments Number: 7 Created: 12/16/2003 [12/16/031 CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO REC IVE COPIES OF REVISIONS L Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ motility _ L —Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 lArW& PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Foil Collins Current Planninga DATE: July ''20, 2001 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: 436-96F Mulberry Lemay Crossing Phase 3 PDP - Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 22, 2001 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS �" _Plat _Site Drainage Report Other6 clev of Fort Collins _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Mulberry LeMay Crossing Floodplain Comments 12-16-03 1. On the plat, please show the revised floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill. 2. Please create a separate drawing that shows the following: • Floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill • BFE lines • Existing and proposed grading • Building locations 3. Because a LOMR-Fill was done for this site, the proposed grading including the TOG cannot be below the FEMA flood elevations. Based on the proposed grading plan, it appears that there are areas in the center of the parking lot that are below the BFE. There are also elevations in the loading dock that are below the BFE. Please review and revise as necessary to have all grades above the BFE. 4. The BFE for the building appears to be higher than 4933 at the northwest comer of the building, Please review and revise as necessary. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing what the BFE is at the corner of the building is as well as the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (BFE +1.5 ft.). The building finished floor must be above the regulatory flood protection elevation. 5. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing that all HVAC will be above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. 6. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing that a FEMA elevation certificate must be completed and approved prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. Topic: Grading Plans Number: 36 Created: 12/19/2003 [12/19/03] Please provide a construction quality grading plan as the submitted plan was for reference only. Include low spot elevations, break point elevations, grate elevations, tie in to existing grades, and Building Finished Floor Elevations. Topic: utility plans Number: 35 Created: 12/19/2003 112/19103] Please call out the size and type of all existing and proposed storm sewer facilities on the utility plans. Page 2 Project Comments Sheet 1 1 'k'�indki Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: December 19, 2003 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT PDP - TYPE II(LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: December 24, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: utility plans Created: 12/16/2003 Number: 3 [ 12/ 16/031 See checklist for missing/needed items. Created: 12/16/2003 Number: 4 [ 12116/031 Will need off site easement for the construction of the sidewalk that splits the property line with Taco Bell/ KFC. A letter of intent for this easement is needed prior to hearing. Number: 5 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/ 16/031 The parking spaces at the south west corner of the parking lot are two close to the public sidewalk. A larger space that allows for those parking spaces to be screened from Lemay is needed. Number: 6 Created: 12/16/2003 [ 12/ 16/031 Need to show the existing improvements as dashed. Number: 7 Created: 12116/2003 [ 12/ 16/031 See Plans for additional comments. Number: 10 Created: 12/19/2003 [ 12/ 19/031 Combine the utility plans for both projects into one set. Date Signature ✓ / CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat X Site Drainage Report Other. L d _ Utility X Redline Utility X an scape Page 1 Galloway,_ Romero & Associates Design Engineering Planning 5350 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, CO 80111 (303)770-8884 FAX: (303)770-3636 January 7, 2004 RE: Home Depot — Mulberry and Lemay, Ft. Collins, Colorado Final PUD, Mulberry and Lemay Crossings Filing No. 2 — Major Amendment and P.D.P. (Part of Lot 6) Comment/Response Letter Below is a the list of comments and responses (revisions) to the PUD — Major Amendment and PDP for the Home Depot at Mulberry and Lemay. PLANNING: Summary of Architectural Updates ( See sheets 6, 7 and 8 of 9) based on meeting 12/17/03. 1. The height of the corner entry towers has been raised such that they are more prominently visible above the main building parapet. 2. The scored concrete which delineates the pedestrian walkway has been extended all along the front of the building to the south side of the lumber canopy. 3. All downcast wallpack light fixtures have been changed to decorative gooseneck fixtures and additional gooseneck fixtures have been added. 4. Additional faux windows with arched "lintel' have been added all around the building. 5. Arched "eyebrow" canopies with rods and turnbuckles have been added above the doors around the sides and back of the building. Turnbuckle elements have been added above the lumber loading doors. No canopies have been added above the loading dock doors due to the conflict with loading and unloading of tractor trailers. This is consistent with the Wal- Mart project to the North. 6. Fascia/facade components have been added periodically around the sides and back of the building in order to interrupt the main building parapet and facade. They also serve to create additional architectural interest and relief in the facade of the building. They include an "arched" component which serves to coordinate with the arched eyebrow canopies and the rotunda entry feature. 7. An additional sheet 8 of 9 has been added which contains a straight on view of the south- east elevation and details of the pilasters, square faux windows, arched faux windows, arched eyebrow canopies and a profile of the building cornice. ZONING (PUD — Major Amendment Comments): Comment: Number 1 - General Note #15 restricts delivery, trash compaction, etc. between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Is the 1:00 a.m. a misprint? Is it supposed to be 10:00 a.m. or some other hour? Restricting the hours to only 1:00 a.m. seems rather pointless. That would mean at 1:30 a.m. they can conduct all of these nuisance operations. The restricted hours should be between 10:00 p.m. and perhaps 7:00 a.m. or some other hour that makes sense. Response: Yes, it is a misprint. The corrected hours of restricted activity is 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (please see revised Cover Sheet) Comment: Number 2 - The parking space dimensions are listed in the "schedule" on the site plan, but the drive aisle width also needs to be listed. Response: The Site Plan "schedule" was paired back per Planning Department comments. The Horizontal Control Plan was used as the basis for the new site plan, so all drive aisle and parking stall widths are labeled with dimensions. Comment: Number 3 —Need to show, label dimension the building footprint and/or envelope and show distances to at least 2 lot lines. This applies to the Home Depot building and the future building. Response: This information is shown on the Utilities Plans set "Site Plan", as it has all the casements on to show the building envelope in relation to the easements. Comment: Number 4 — The proposed outdoor product display area (492 on the schedule) appears to only be against the building. Is there going to be a outdoor seasonal display/product area in the parking lot as there is at the JFK Home Depot? If so, that area must be labeled on the plan. If it is already labeled, I can't find it amongst all the other numbers. Response: There is a seasonal sales area in the back northeast corner of the store and a plaza/seasonal sale area that is located adjacent to the Garden Center. Please refer to site plan for label. ZONING (PDP Comments): Comment: Number 1 - General Note #15. Is the 1:00 a.m. a misprint? It doesn't make much sense to restrict the activities to only 1:00 a.m. The restricted hours should end at 7:00 a.m. or some other time that makes sense. F:\HomeDepot\HD149-HD249-HD449 - HD Store #NW0066 - Store Development - Ft. Collins, CO - NEC Mulberry and Lemay\Dots\Letters\HD249-jna-Planning Comment -Response letter.doc Response: Yes, it is a misprint. The corrected hours of restricted activity is 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (please see revised Cover Sheet) Comment: Number 2 — If I understand this correctly, this PDP is only for the parking lot improvements on Lot 6. If that is the case, then the only comment I have is that the drive aisle width in the parking lot needs to be indicated. Response: Please refer to revised site plan that has dimensions for all drive aisles and parking stall widths. TRANSPORTATION: Comment: Number 18 — Will there be an accessible handicapped (HQ route from the HC parking stalls in front of the future building? It would be appropriate to identify an accessible route before the asphalt is poured so that the crosswalks and access ramps can be built in a manner consistent with the entire site (see red lines for suggested route). Response: Plans revised to show route as recommended in red lines. Comment: Number 19 — Will the curb be installed in front of the future building adjacent to the proposed Home Depot? Response: There is a transition zone between the flush paving and the raised curb (please see revised grading for more details). Comment: Number 22 —There will need to be a walkway installed along the south side of the drive aisle, 6' minimum, which aligns between the Home Depot and the future building, per the original plan. This will also accommodate the ADA accessibility route issue in comment #18 (see redlines). Response: Please see revised site plan for the addition of the sidwalk. Comment: Number 23 — Further clarification is needed on how a person can walk from the front of the Home Depot to the future building through the contractor loading area. Response: Paving and painted striping adjusted to show exclusive pedestrian walkway (please refer to revised site plan). ENGINEERING (PDP Comments): Comment: Number 3 — See checklist for missing/needed items. Response: Please refer to revised Utility Plans set for added items. Comment: Number 4 - Will need off site easement for the construction of the sidewalk that splits the property line with Taco Bell/KFC. A letter of intent for this easement is needed prior to hearing. Response: Sidewalk is existing (please refer to revised plans). Per my meeting with Sherri this item is not required as sidewalk is existing. F:\HomeDepot\HD149-HD249-HD449 - HD Store #NW0066 - Store Development - Ft. Collins, CO - NEC Mulberry and Lemay\Dots\Letters\HD249-jna-Planning Comment -Response letter.doc Comment: Number 5 — The parking spaces at the south west corner of the parking lot are too close to the public sidewalk. A larger space that allows those parking spaces to be screened from Lemay is needed. Response: Parking spaces greater than the required 2' from the back of the sidewalk. Comment: Number 6—Need to show the existing improvements as dashed. Response: Please see revised Utility Plans for existing improvements shown as dashed. Comment: Number 7 — See Plans for additional comments. Response: Please refer to revised Utility Plans set for revisions based on red lines. Comment: Number 10 — Combine the utility plans for both projects into one set. Response: Set has been combined as single, stand-alone Utility Plans set. ENGINEERING (PUD — Major Amendment Comments) Continent: Number 17 —The site plan needs to clearly show what is being approved and to be built by this project. Everything is shown in the same line weight. Response: Please see revised Utilities plan set for dashed or hidden lines to distinguish existing from proposed as well as phase line for future building. Comment: Number 8 — See checklist for missing/needed items. Response: Please refer to revised Utility Plans set for added items. Comment: Number 9 —Need to show the existing improvements as dashed. Response: Please see revised Utility Plans set for revisions of existing items as dashed linetype. Comment: Number 10 — The walls and iron picket fence need to be located at least 2 feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. This may impact the parking stall layout/dimensions in a couple of areas. Response: Please see revise site plan for the horizontal control plan dimensions showing at least 2 feet clearance from back of walk to the outer edge of any column, fence, parking, etc. Drive aisles were reduced from 30' to 28' in rear of store to gain clearance. The seat walls in the north side were moved in slightly to gain necessary clearance. Comment: Number 11 — The wall at the northeast corner of the driveway being relocated needs to be modified so that pedestrians can be seen by cars approaching the street and it is not a blind corner. Response: The wall was moved 9' to the east to provide greater side distance at the access (please see revised plans) FAHomeDepot\HD149-HD249-HD449 - HD Store #NW0066 -Store Development -Ft. Collins, CO -NEC Mulberry and Lemay\Dots\Letters\HD249-jna-Planning Comment -Response letter.doc Comment: Number 12 — Neither the screen wall or the columns for the screen wall can extend into the site distance easement. From the drawing it appears that the columns are encroaching into the easement. Response: The wall has been moved back so the columns are out of the site distance easement. Continent: Number 13 — Need to clarify what is going to be built and what is proposed for approval in the area around the future building site. Response: Please sec revised Site Plan for Phase Line around future building Comment: Number 14 — Need to see a plan where the building envelope and the easements are shown. Need to know if the building is encroaching into any easements and will help to define the limits of the vacations that are needed. Response: Please see revised Site Plan in the Utilities set for the building envelope. We have also create an Easement Plan showing easements and buildings only to make it a little easier to see what is being vacated and what is being added. Comment: Number 15 — The private storm line can not run within the public easement. Response: Storm sewer is out of public easements. Please see revised plans for location of storm sewer line to easements. Comment: Number 16 — See Plans for additional comments. Response: Please refer to revised Utility Plans set for revisions based on red lines. Comment: Number 30 — Combine the utility plans for both projects into one set. Response: Set has been combined as single, stand-alone Utility Plans set. Comment: Number 31 — For areas of easement vacation, I need a drawing/sketch with dimensions showing the areas requested for vacation so the requests can be routed to the utilities for review. I emailed Jon at Galloway Romero the information/fonns regarding the easement vacations and dedications. Response: We are graphically showing the easement vacations and dedications on the Easement Plan. We are having our drafter (Dennis Streigel with Engineering Service Company) start on the exhibits for these by 01-08-04. We should have to City Engineering in a week or so thereafter. Comment: Number 32 - Add a note on the utility plans with the approximate limits of street repair for the driveway removal and new installation going out to the centerline of the roadway. The note should read as follows: Approximate limits of street cut/mill and overlay if pavement disturbed. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repair to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Response: Refer to Utility plans for limits of street repair and note. F:\HomeDepot\HD149-HD249-HD449 - HD Store #NW0066 -Store Development -Ft. Collins, CO -NEC Mulberry and Lemay\Dots\Letters\HD249-jna-Planning Comment -Response letter.doc STORMWATER: Topic: Drainage Letter Comment: Number 34 —The letter provided as a drainage report is insufficient. Please provide calculations showing what the assumed basins' flow from the newly developed areas were fi-om the previous studies and what the actual flows are. Document that the assumed flows from these basins will fit within the pond volumes as designed with the Mulberry Lemay First Filing plans and later modifed with Building I re -grading of the pond and the addition of the retaining walls. Response: Please refer to expanded drainage report. Topic: Drainage Plan Comment: Number 37 — Please provide a drainage plan that calls out all basins, and includes a hydrology summary table per City requirements. Response: Please refer to Drainage Plan provided in the Utility Plan set and in the back of the Drainage Report. Comment: Number 38 —Plans are confusing, need to show what is existing and what is proposed in different line thicknesses, it is not clear from what was submitted what is being built by this project. Response: Please refer to revised plans in Utility Plan set for corrected linetypes. Topic: Erosion Control Comment: Number 33 — Plan needs notes, BMP's, calculations, etc. Response: Please refer to Erosion Control Cover Sheet, Notes and Details sheet and the Erosion Control Plan. Topic: Flooplain Comments Continent: 11. On the Plat, please show the revised floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill. Response: No plat for this submittal. Comment: I Please create a separate drawing that shows the following: • Floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill • BFE Lines • Existing and proposed grading • Building locations Response: Please see separate drawing with above listed items. Comment: 3. Because a LOMR-Fill was done for this site, the proposed grading including the TOG cannot be below the FEMA flood elevations. Based on the proposed grading plan, it appears that there are areas in the center of the parking lot that are below the BFE. There are also elevations in the loading dock that are below the BFE. Please review and revise as necessary to have all grades above the BEE. F:\HomeDepot\HD149-HD249-HD449 - HD Store #NW0066 - Store Development - Ft. Collins, CO - NEC Mulberry and Lemay\Dots\Letters\HD249-jna-Planning Comment -Response letter.doc Response: Please see revised grading for revised TOG elevations above the BFE. Because of the low elevation of the access to the east of the building, the building cannot be raised to raise to get the dock out of the floodplain. Per my meeting with Marsha the City is OK with the dock at the current elevation if the pad for the trash compactor is elevated to the level of the BFE. Please refer to the revised grading plans for new elevations. Comment: 4. The BFE for the building appears to be higher than 4933 at the northwest corner of the building. Please review and revise as necessary. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing what the BFE is at the corner of the building as well as the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (BEE +l .5 ft.). The building finished flow must be above the regulatory flood protection elevation. Response: Please refer to the added Floodplain sheet for above information. Comment: 5. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing that all HVAC will be above Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. Response: Please refer to added Floodplain sheet for note. Comment: 6. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing that a FEMA elevation certificate must be completed and approved prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. Response: Please refer to added Floodplain sheet for note. Topic: Grading Plans Comment: Number 36 — Please provide a construction quality grading plan as the submitted plan was for reference only. Include low spot elevations, break Point elevations, grate elevations, tie in to existing grades, and building ]Finished Floor Elevations. Response: Please refer to revised Grading Plan in the Utility Plans set. Topic: Utility Plans Comment: Please call out the size and type of all existing and proposed storm sewer facilities on the utility plans. Response: Please refer to revised Utility Plan in the Utility Plans set. ELCO WATER REVIEW Comment: Redlined Plans Response: Water Meters and hydrant placed as requested XCEL ENERGY: Comment: PSCO has a 4" Ped Gas Main located in utility easement along 121h Street. F\HomeDepot\HD149-HD249-HD449 - HD Store #NW0066 - Store Development - Ft. Collins, CO - NEC Mulberry and Lemay\Dots\Letters'HD249-jna-Planning Comment -Response letter.doc Response: Gas Main called as 4" Gas Main on Utility Plan Comment: No trees planted within 4' of Gas Lines. Response: Please refer to Landscaping Plan for the addition of this note in the General Notes. Comment: Will need 3 — 5' blank wall to install gas meter (no windows/doors/vents/ etc.). Response: Item noted and will be forwarded to architect designing the building (although I know that we currently meet this requirement) Comment: Install Gas Service prior to asphalt. Response: Refer to revised Utility plan noting in the schedule that line is to be installed prior to putting in asphalt. BUILDING INSPECTION: All information noted and will be passed onto architect for project. Thank you, Gall ay, 7'�ro Associates L t J N. Andresen r., PE R\HomeDepot\HD149-HD249-HD449 - HD Store #NW0066 - Store Development - Ft. Collins, CO - NEC Mulberry and Lemay\Dots\Letters\HD249-jna-Planning Comment -Response letter.doc Project Comments Sheet 60me Selected Departments CitV of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 28, 2001 PROJECT: MULBERRY LEMAY CROSSING, PHASE 3 PDP - TYPE II (LUC 436- 96F') All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Dept: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy If this project develops before the 2nd filing is complete, than this project will have to show what interim improvements they will make to the water/waste water lines so their facility can operate. We'll also need to discuss what street improvements they'll have to complete for fire access. All required emergency access roads, including public streets, shall be installed and serviceable before commencement of above -ground construction. Show phasing. Issue Contact: Susan Joy The parking lot features on the east side of the property do not match the 2nd filing. Continue the main pedestrian spine through to Lemay and add access ramps, crosswalks. 10 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Complete and submit the Checklist in Appendix E-4. 11 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Please show the existing features and phasing between 2nd and 3rd filing (all sheets) in a ghosted or alternate line weight, each sheet. Expand the legend on each sheet to include the different line weights. 1 of 4 Project Comments Sheet 66a Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Stormwater Utility Date: January 20, 2004 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE 11 (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 21, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Drainage Plan Number: 37 Created: 12/19/2003 1/19/04 Drainage plan provided. Thank you. Please use a little darker line thickness for drainage basin lines since the line weight shown will be difficult to see and for scannability purposes. Please either call out propsed storm line sizes on this sheet as well (preferred) or reference utility plan sheet for proposed storm line sizes. [12/19/03] Please provide: a drainage plan that calls out all basins, and includes a hydrology summary table per City requirements. Topic: Easements Number: 39 Created: 1 /19/2004 [1/19/041 Are Lot 2 or Lot 6 being replatted with tis project? If not will easement be dedicated by separate documents? It would be helpful to have an easrnent exhibit showing all the existing easements and the easements to be dedicated by this project on the property for both Lot 2 and Lot 6. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 41 [1/20/041 Sediment/Erosion Control Plan Comments Created: 1 /20/2004 Mulberr & Lemay Crossin a Depot zy Signat D teWO ,..CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO R!�E COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Sit/Drainage Report Other �tility edline Utility Landscape Page 1 1. There is no erosion control report or calculations per City specifications. Please provide. 2. Please replace the sediment/erosion control notes on sheet #6 with the updated City of Fort Collins standard notes (available from the Utility). Make sure that any other notes you include do not contradict these standard notes. 3. Why is the silt fencing not extended across the entire south end of the site (the downhill side)? Second Review January 20, 2004 Please provide erosion control surety calculations Please respond to previous erosion control plan review comments # 2, and #3. Please use the recently updated erosion control notes on the erosion control plan. An electronic copy of these notes can be emailed to the appropriate design engineer. Please contact me at 224-6035 and provide me with your email address so that I can forward you the an electronic copy of the revised notes. Topic: Floodplain Comments Number: 7 Created: 12/16/2003 Home Depot Floodplain Comments 1-15-04 1. On the plat, please show the revised floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill. — REPEAT comment 2. Please show the revised floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill. — REPEAT comment 3. The generator and transformer on the east side of the property will probably be shown to still be in the floodplain area. If so, these utilities must be elevated 2 ft. above the BFE. A floodplain use permit will be required for each. A FEMA elevation certificate will be required before the CO is issued. Please put these notes on the plans along with the BFE and required elevations. 4. The pallet and propane storage areas on the east side of the property will probably be shown to still be in the floodplain area. There are no floatable materials allowed within the Poudre River floodplain. Either these materials must be relocated or these enclosures must become fully walled and roofed structures that are then either elevated or floodproofed 2 ft above the BFE with floodplain use permits and elevation certificates. 5. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing that no floatable materials are to be stored in areas still mapped in the floodplain. Floatable materials include pallets, propane tanks, lumber or other materials, storage sheds, overnight storage of vehicles, etc. 6. There is still one TOG elevation that is below the BFE as noted on the floodplain drawing. Please revise to be above the BFE. Page 2 A description is needed of how the drainage in the loading dock area will work and not have backup from the Poudre River. This was a condition of allowing the loading area to be below the BFE when discussed on the phone prior to this submittal. [12/16/03] Home Depot Mulberry LeMay Crossing Floodplain Comments 12-16-03 1. On the plat, please show the revised floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill. 2. Please create a separate drawing that shows the following: • Floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill • BFE lines • Existing and proposed grading • Building locations 3. Because a LOMR-Fill was done for this site, the proposed grading including the TOG cannot be below the FEMA flood elevations. Based on the proposed grading plan, it appears that there are areas in the center of the parking lot that are below the BFE. There are also elevations in the loading dock that are below the BFE. Please review and revise as necessary to have all grades above the BFE. 4. The BFE for the building appears to be higher than 4933 at the northwest corner of the building. Please review and revise as necessary. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing what the BFE is at the corner of the building is as well as the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (BFE +1.5 ft.). The building finished floor must be above the regulatory flood protection elevation. 5. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing that all HVAC will be above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. 6. Please include a note on the floodplain drawing that a FEMA elevation certificate must be completed and approved prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. Topic: Grading Plans Number: 36 1/19/04 Created: 12/19/2003 Thanks for providing a grading plan. Please label or differentiate betweenall outfall vs. infall curbs on the plan. Please add spot elevations around parking lot to ensure site will drain properly when paved. Please show what will be done as far as grading on the site of the future building in the interim period. Please call out the existing pipes' invert elevation in the ponds. [12/19/03] Please provide a construction quality grading plan as the submitted plan was for reference only. Include low spot elevations, break point elevations, grate elevations, tie in to existing grades, and Building Finished Floor Elevations. Page 3 Topic: utility plans Number: 35 1/19/04 Created: 12/19/2003 Storm sewer pipes' sizes and types were provided thank you. Please provide profiles of the proposed storm lines to evaluate any utility crossings. Show 100 year HGL on the pipe profile. Add notes to the profile sheet requiring all proposed pipes to be water -tight and to be inspected by the City at time of construction. [12/19/03] Please call out the size and type of all existing and proposed storm sewer facilities on the utility plans. Page 4 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Transportation Planning Date: January 21, 2004 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 21, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Transportation Number: 18 Created: 12/16/2003 Will there be an accessible handicap (HC) route from the HC parking stalls in front of the future building? It would be appropriate to identify an accessible route before the asphalt is poured so that the crosswalks and access ramps can be built in a manner consistent with the entire site (see red lines for suggested route). [1-21-041 With the revisions from the last submittal, the plan sets need to reflect the appropriate access ramps to assure an ADA route from the handicap parking stalls (see red lines). Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat _ ��' Site Drainage Report Other_ _ Utility = Redline Utility Landscape Page l Project Comments Sheet 6�a� Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: January 23, 2004 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 21, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: utility plans Number: 8 Created: 12/16/2003 [12/16/03] See checklist for missing/needed items. Number: 16 Created: 12/16/2003 [12/16/031 See Plans for additional comments. Number: 31 Created: 12/19/2003 [12/19/031 For areas of easement vacation, I need a drawing / sketch with dimensions showing the areas requested for vacation so the requests can be routed to the utilities for review. I emailed Jon at Galloway Romero the information/ forms regarding the easement vacations and dedications. Number: 42 Created: 1 /22/2004 [1/22/041 [12/16/03] The parking spaces at the south west corner of the parking lot are two close to the public sidewalk. A larger space that allows for those parking spaces to be screened from Lemay is needed. Number: 43 Created: 1/23/2004 [1/23/041 Please look at the City scaning requirements in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards and make sure the plans comply Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ x Utility _ U' Redline Utility �_ Landscape Page I Galloway, Romero & Associates Design Engineering Planning 5350 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, CO 80111 (303)770-8884 FAX: (303)770-3636 EMAIL: greg_kishiyama@graa.com March 12, 2004 Ted Shepard City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave., 1 st Floor Ft. Collins, CO 80522 Re: Home Depot, Utility Plans Dear Mr. Shepard: Enclosed with this letter are 2 copies of the revised Utility Plans for the subject project, which address the comments received from the City of Fort Collins in January, 2004. The written comments are reproduced below with their associated responses in bold type. Please redirect the revised plans as needed. Topic: utility plans Number:8 Created:12/16/2003 [12/16/03] See checklist for missing/needed items. Missing items on Checklist have been added. Number:16 Created:12/16/2003 (12/16/03) See Plans for additional comments. Plan redlines have been reviewed and drawings revised as needed. Topic: Drainage Plan Number:37 Created:12/19/2003 1 /19/04 Drainage plan provided. Thank you. Please use a little darker line thickness for drainage basin lines since the line weight shown will be difficult to see and for scannability purposes. Please either call out proposed storm line sizes on this sheet as well (preferred) or reference utility plan sheet for proposed storm line sizes. Done. Topic: Erosion Control Number:41 Created:1/20/2004 [ 1 /20/04] I ID249-gdk-Itr.mjIity plans comment response. doc Page 1 of 3 Sediment/Erosion Control Plan Comments 2. Please replace the sediment/erosion control notes on sheet #6 with the updated City of Fort Collins standard notes (available from the Utility). Make sure that any other notes you include do not contradict these standard notes. Done. January 20, 2004 Please provide erosion control surety calculations Please use the recently updated erosion control notes on the erosion control plan. An electronic copy of these notes can be emailed to the appropriate design engineer. Please contact me at 224-6035 and provide me with your email address so that I can forward you the an electronic copy of the revised notes. Done. Topic: Floodplain Comments Number:7 Created:12/16/2003 Home Depot Floodplain Comments 1-15-04 3. The generator and transformer on the east side of the property will probably be shown to still be in the floodplain area. If so, these utilities must be elevated 2 ft. above the BFE. A floodplain use permit will be required for each. A FEMA elevation certificate will be required before the CO is issued. Please put these notes on the plans along with the BFE and required elevations. The generator and transformer pad has been called out to be 2 ft. above BFE. 4. The pallet and propane storage areas on the east side of the property will probably be shown to still be in the floodplain area. There are no floatable materials allowed within the Poudre River floodplain. Either these materials must be relocated or these enclosures must become fully walled and roofed structures that are then either elevated or floodproofed 2 ft above the BFE with floodplain use permits and elevation certificates. The pallet and propane storage areas have been moved out of the floodplain area. 7. A description is needed of how the drainage in the loading dock area will work and not have backup from the Poudre River. This was a condition of allowing the loading area to be below the BFE when discussed on the phone prior to this submittal. The loading dock area storm drain pipe will have a check valve at its termination inside the downstream manhole. The check valve will allow drainage flows from the dock area, but will close to prevent flood water flows from backing up into the dock pipe. Topic: Grading Plans Number:36 Created:12/19/2003 1 /19/04 I 1 D249-gdk-Itr.utibty plans comment response.doc Page 2 of 3 Thanks for providing a grading plan. Please label or differentiate between all outfall vs. infall curbs on the plan. Done. Please add spot elevations around parking lot to ensure site will drain properly when paved. Done. Please show what will be done as far as grading on the site of the future building in the interim period. The future building pad will remain undisturbed. The proposed construction will tie into the existing grades on the lot. Please call out the existing pipes' invert elevation in the ponds. Done. Topic: utility plans Number:35 Created:12/19/2003 1/19/04 Storm sewer pipes' sizes and types were provided thank you. Please provide profiles of the proposed storm lines to evaluate any utility crossings. Show 100 year HGL on the pipe profile. Add notes to the profile sheet requiring all proposed pipes to be water -tight and to be inspected by the City at time of construction. Storm pipe plan and profile sheets have been added. Water -tight piping and inspection note have been added as note #49 on the cover sheet. It is my understanding that the original redlines have already been returned to you and are therefore not enclosed with this resubmittal. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Jon Andresen or myself at 303-770-8884. Thank you. Sincerely, Galloway, Romero & Associates Gregory D. Kishiyama Project Engineer 1ID249-gdk-Inutility plans comment response.doc Page 3 of 3 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: April 6, 2004 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 21, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: utility plans Number: 16 Created: 12/16/2003 [12/16/031 See Plans for additional comments. Number: 43 Created: 1 /23/2004 [4/6/04] Need to make sure that the plans meet scanning requirements. See appendix E-6 of LCUASS for information. A few sheets still have overlapping information and faint lines. 11/23104] Please look at the City scaning requirements in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards and make sure the plans comply Number: 44 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] No site of landscape plans provided for review this round. Number: 45 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Did add Elco and Boxelder to the City signature block, but don't know if this will work for them. Attached is a copy of the signature blocks that they signed on a recent project. They had additional notes that they wanted added to the plans. Check with Elco and Boxelder on how they desire the signature blocks for them to be done. Number: 46 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] on final plans the information in the revision blocks needs to be removed. This area is used to list changes/ revisions made to these documents after approval. Not for the rounds of review up to approval. Number: 47 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 2 of 18 Add the following to #s 6 and 7 under the schedule: — to be placed a minimum of 2 feet behind the sidewalk/ right -of — way nape CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Oc Site Drainage Report Other C� Utility G ' Rcdlinc Utility e:>� Landscape Page I 12 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Minimum size for the Vicinity Map is 10" x 10" and to a scale of 1 "=1000-1500'. 13 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Update the General Cony truction Notes, see Appendix E-2. 14 15 16 17 f.] 19 20 21 22 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Need the following statement annotated on the Cover Sheet: "I hereby affirm..." See Appendix E-4. Issue Contact. Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide the names, addresses, phone numbers for the Developer(s)/or & Owners(s). Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide a 4"x6" block on each sheet for the Local Entity to place their stamp of approval. Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Add the current date (month and year) under the legal description. Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide two project bench marks. Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Reference the updated or current soils report. Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Add the following statement, "I hereby affirm." See Appendix E- 4. Issue Contact. Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide the names, addresses, phone numbers for the Developers & Owners. Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Add the indemnification statement, "These plans have been reviewed by the....". See Appendix E-4. 2 of Number: 48 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 2 of 18 Add the following to #22 under the schedule, will need to check with planning on the width of the walk that needs to remain clear. —A _ foot clear walkway must be provided. Number: 49 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 2 of 18 The radii for the new driveway shall be 15 feet, per Section 8.2.9 of the LCUASS. The ramps at this access point are shown incorrectly. Please show going straight across, not at an angle. Also see diagram on the page of how the adjacent sidewalk/ plaza will need to tie into this ramp to meet ADA standards. Number: 50 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 3 of 18 As indicated previously, need to provide additional spot elevations at the new driveway. See plans for the minimum 4 spots that need to be provided. Number: 51 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Need to add detail #707 back onto the plans (high volume driveway detail. Number: 52 Created: 4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Easement Dedications are needed in final format when mylars are submitted for signature. Once provided I will let you know what the filing fees will be for the easement vacations and the easement dedications. Page 2 rn + .0 zn rrl r+ -Llo Z-nON M 0- 'IVin OM 10 M .• Nip 'ti `. CA W�}�,-fir: }i '•� t .t� w.O �r '�= �'i ��� to Dyg n i N - �1* s < r m �'. • . .. � � ,,,� a,„y �,_ t � ... a `?.; : � � � _ .. _ � � -a � --i r Y .7 -. r ,� ram, c u tqF ,�j�'j'- • +�", O `+ .._*1 +' f 5' i3 iA Qp 1'y t..Z'rT"r.`� ' tyJ24 Ft1 w rn t ��Z� F.OZ�i Q N ►r-��Z ���{{--jsy'� �� $y BOA' k Ow 4A�!] jAifi+rEM�Uf�y sue{{ Z rn ' 0 0 > X -i Z t p D -i �1. VI rn „ or fp �j m {q c y i�1 y 5K�f'�7i*7ji , per. o An �5!f �"tr,$j`/ K�%n��+t yf•s v.�s�' zd,.ya= isi �s '+'t,^�. �S :r J >`"-•F- � ^' '.,i9p d>. X�1yf� J c �+ � -u..w rv�-r -a ��..` w :. i X-•: S "� �,4F.1 :RAY; FitiNG.4 9 ` �a Project Comments Sheet _'�' Selected Departments Citvof Port Collins Department: Stormwater Utility Date: April 8, 2004 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT - TYPE 11 (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: January 21, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Easements Number: 39 4/7/04 - Repeat Comment Created: 1 /19/2004 [1 /19/041 Are Lot 2 or Lot 6 being replatted with this project ? If not, will easement be dedicated by separate documents? It would be helpful to have an easement exhibit showing all the existing easements and the easements to be dedicated by this project on the property for both Lot 2 and Lot 6. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 54 Created: 4/8/2004 1. Please provide an erosion control surety calculation. 2. Why is the silt fencing not extended across the entire south end of the site? Topic: Floodplain Comments Number: 53 Created: 4/8/2004 1. On the plat, please show the revised floodplain lines per the LOMR-Fill. — REPEAT comment 2. There is still one TOG elevation that is below the BEE as noted on the floodplain drawing. The elevation is at 33.0 Please revise to be above the BFE. — REPEAT Comment Co ucr) For &S �tdrZn Lf 8 0 �- Signature Date CHECK HERE. IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site Z Drainage Report Other Utility _ l Redline Utility J/ Landscape cc Page 1 Q10WILA/l ew, { 3. The agreement to allow the loading dock to be below the BFE was based on the condition that there was a way to make the local drainage in the loading dock work and not be subject to backup from the Poudre and that a check valve would not be used. This is because we have found that due to a lack of maintenance, check valves often don't work and then prevent local drainage. Please redesign how the drainage in this area will work based on the above conditions which were previously discussed. 4. The drainage report should state that the property is in the Poudre River floodplain, list the FENIA map panel #, describe the LOMR-Fill, explain how the property is meeting the floodplain requirements (building 18" above BFE — condition of LOMR, the generator elevated 2 ft., elevation certificates required for CO, etc.). Topic: Grading Plans Number: 36 Created: 12/19/2003 4/7/04 - Repeat Comment - Please differentiate between outfall vs. infall curb and gutter on the grading plan. This can be done by having one of the curbs shaded for example. On the current grading plan, there are no locations for where the curbs transition from inflow to outflow. 1 /19/04 Thanks for providing a grading plan. Please label or differentiate between all outfall vs. infall curbs on the plan. Please add spot elevations around parking lot to ensure site will drain properly when paved. Please show what will be done as far as grading on the site of the future building in the interim period. Please call out the existing pipes' invert elevation in the ponds. [12/19/03] Please provide a construction quality grading plan as the submitted plan was for reference only. Include low spot elevations, break point elevations, grate elevations, tie in to existing grades, and Building Finished Floor Elevations. Topic: utility plans Number: 35 Created: 12/19/2003 4/7/04 - Repeat Comment - Please include the 100-year HGL on the pipe profile and add note that All Storm Sewers are to be Inspected by the City. 1 /19/04 Storm sewer pipes' sizes and types were provided thank you. Please provide profiles of the proposed storm lines to evaluate any utility crossings. Show 100 year HGL on the pipe profile. Add notes to the profile sheet requiring all proposed pipes to be water -tight and to be inspected by the City at time of construction. [12/19/03] Please call out the size and type of all existing and proposed storm sewer facilities on the utility plans. Page 2 Galloway, Romero & Associates Design Engineering Planning 5350 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, CO 80111 (303)770-8884 FAX: (303) 770-3636 EMAIL: greg_kishiyama@graa.com June 11, 2004 Sheri Wamhoff City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave., 1st Floor Ft. Collins, CO 80522 Re: Home Depot, Utility Plans Dear Ms. Wamhoff: Enclosed with this letter are 2 copies of the revised Utility Plans for the subject project, which address the comments received from the City of Fort Collins in April 9, 2004. The written comments are reproduced below with their associated responses in bold type. Topic: Easements Number:39 Created:1/19/2004 [4/7/04] Repeat Comment [1/19/04] Are Lot 2 or Lot 6 being replatted with this project? If not, will easement be dedicated by separate documents? It would be helpful to have an easement exhibit showing all the existing easements and the easements to be dedicated by this project on the property for both Lot 2 and Lot 6. We are not platting this project. The easements are by separate document. There is an Easement Plan (sheet 8 of 18) in the Utility Drawing set. Topic: Erosion Control Number:54 Created:4/8/2004 1. Please provide an erosion control surety calculation. Attached. 2. Why is the silt fencing not extended across the entire south end of the site? Silt fence has been extended across the south end of the site. 3. The agreement to allow the loading dock to be below the BFE was based on the 10249-gdk-In utility plans comment response2-doc Page I of condition that there was a way to make the local drainage in the loading dock work and not be subject to backup from the Poudre and that a check valve would not be used. This is because we have found that due to a lack of maintenance, check valves often don't work and then prevent local drainage. Please redesign how the drainage; in this area will work based on the above conditions which were previously discussed. The check valve has been removed. Due to site constraints, the loading dock area will be allowed to temporarily back up in larger storm events as discussed with Marsha Hilmes Robinson. 4. The drainage report should state that the property is in the Poudre River floodplain, list the F EMA map panel #, describe the LOMR-Fill, explain how the property is meeting the floodplain requirements (building 18" above BFE-condition of LOMR, the generator elevated 2 ft., elevation certificates required for CO, etc.). Topic: Grading Plans Number:36 Created:12/19/2003 4/7/04 — Repeat Comment — Please differentiate between outfall vs. Infall curb and gutter on the grading plan. This can be done by having one of the curbs shaded for example. On the current grading plan, there are no locations for where the curbs transition from inflow to outflow. The outfall curbs have been shaded on the grading plan. Topic: Utility Plans Number:35 Created:12/19/2003 4/7/04 — Repeat Comment — Please include the 100-year HGL on the pipe profile and note that All Storm Sewers are to be Inspected by the City. 100-year HGLs have been added to pipe profiles. The inspection note is on the cover sheet (note 49) Topic: Utility Plans Number:16 Created:12/16/2003 (12/16/03) See Plans for additional comments. Plan redlines have been reviewed and drawings revised as needed. Number:43 Created:1/23/2004 [4/6/04] Need to make sure that the plans meet scanning requirements. See appendix E-6 of LCUASS for information. A few sheets still have overlapping information and faint lines. We have attempted to eliminate the overlapping information and have made adjustments to line qualities to make the plans more readable per LCUASS. We have also enclosed one original print for scanning purposes to help maintain reproducible quality. I ID249-gdk-ln.utility plans comment response2doc Page 2 of 4 Number:44 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/04] No site of landscape plans provided for review this round. Landscape plan has been attached. Number:45 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Did add Elco and Boxelder to the City signature block, but don't know if this will work for them. Attached is a copy of the signature blocks that they signed on a recent project. They had additional notes that they wanted added to the plans. Check with Elco and Boxelder on how they desire the signature blocks for them to be done. We have been in contact with Elco and Boxelder. Signature blocks have been modified on all sheets. Number:46 Created:4/612004 [4/6/04] On final plans the information in the revision blocks needs to be removed. This area is used to list changes/revisions made to these documents after approval. Not for the rounds of review up to approval. Revision blocks have been cleared. Number:47 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 2 of 18 Add the following to #s 6 and 7 under the schedule: - to be placed a minimum of 2 feet behind the sidewalk/right—of-way. Done. Number:48 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 2 of 18 Add the following to #22 under the schedule, will need to check with planning on the width of the walk that needs to remain clear: - A __foot clear walkway must be provided. Done. Number:49 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 2 of 18 The radii for the new driveway shall be 15 feet, per Section 8.2.9 of the LCUASS. The ramps at this access point are shown incorrectly. Please show going straight across, not at an angle. Also see diagram on the page of how the adjacent sidewalk/plaza will need to tie into this ramp to meet ADA standards. Radii and ramps have been modified as requested. Number:50 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/04] Sheet 3 of 18 As indicated previously, need to provide additional spot elevations at the new driveway. See plans fort the minimum 4 spots that need to be provided. I ID249-gdk-Itr.uGHty plans comment response2.doc Pagc 3 or Done. Number:51 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/041 Need to add detail #707 back onto the plans (high volume driveway detail.) Done. Number:52 Created:4/6/2004 [4/6/041 Easement Dedications are needed in final format when mylars are submitted for signature. Once provided I will let you know what the filing fees will be for the easement vacations and the easement dedications. Noted. Also enclosed are the original redlines. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Jon Andresen or myself at 303-770-8884. Thank you. Sincerely, Galloway, Romero & Associates Gregory D. Kishiyama Project Engineer ID249-gdk-Itr.utifity P',ans comment response2.doc Page 4 of 4 of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Transportation Planning Date: July 6, 2004 Project: MULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS, 2ND FILING, HOME DEPOT - MAJOR AMENDMENT -TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: July 07, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Transportation Number: 55 [7/6/04] No further comments. Signature Created: 7/6/2004 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: February 28, 2001 TO: Technical Svs PROJECT: #36-96E Mulberry Lemay Crossing, Filing 2 — (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shpeard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: March 14, 2001 No Comment ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) *"PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE �bc REFERENCE** 0. K, s P'W W cM CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Dat& _ Site DmmaLeR7rt Signatuf2t r No _ Reline Utility Landscape Citv of Fort Collins 23 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Grading Sheet: Add the statement: `TI = top of foundation elevations shown...". See the Checklist in Appencix E-4. 24 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Grading Sheet: Provide spot elevations in all entrances, see details 7-32A and B. 25 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Correct No;th Arrow - all sheets. 26 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Expand Legend - Show Property, ROW, easement lineweights. 27 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Show all existing features for a minimum of 150' beyond the project limits on the east side of the building and at least 100' to the south. Show existing features adjacent to this development in a ghosted or alternate line weight. 28 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Show proposed utility connections with existing utilities - how will this phase with the 2nd filing? 29 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Show general location of signs and label. 30 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Add "Print Date" - all sheets. 31 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Update all details on Detail Sheet to current LCUASS details 32 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Dimension all sidewalks. 33 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Various labeling, see redlines. 3 of REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: February 28, 2001 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96E Mulberry Lemay Crossing, Filing 2 — (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shpeard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: March 14, 2001 No Comment ErProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE Mulberry Lemay Crossing, 2nd filing REFERENCE** March 20, 2001 Utility Appreciate you showing the roundabout on the utility plans, but now that you are building the conventional intersection we need that back on the plans. Also need to make sure that the elevations on the Lemay access match the elevations for the conventional design. Need to provide emergency access easements on the plat for emergecy services access through the site. Contact Ron Gonzales with Poudre Fire Authority for locations. These were shown on the plan previously, but have since been removed. These also need to be indicated on the site plan. CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE iatnat Site Utility Rcdlinc Utih.,v COPIES OF REVISIONS REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 14, 2000 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #36-96E MULBERRY-LEMAY CROSSING, FILING 21 A REPLAT OF FILING ONE, LOT 2 AND SITE PLAN: S HEET 2 OF 11 All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: November 22, 2000 ElNo Comment ElProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** l Iale Ro,,,61 A Rlw needs be C0o.dlV1n1W Wits fhb r)4 IIERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISION- lRna -- Utility Redline Utility Landscape Citv of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 14, 2000 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96E MULBERRY-LEM" CROSSING, FILING 23 A REPLAT OF FILING ONE, LOT 2 AND SITE PLAN: S HEET 2 OF 11 All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: November 22, 2000 ❑ No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** Ntulbeny Lemay Crossing, 2'ia filing November 22, 2000 These plans need to rellect the changes made to the site by the roundabout project. That project has affected the grades and the pond. phis applies to ine utility plans. The site and landscape plans have been updated to reflect the roundabout. No chanties were made to the plat - I atn returning the redlined plan reviewed 10/00. Plat or routed to all the utilities and effected entities. Once revised the plat I . The plat was received for the first time and was n needs to be submitted for review. 2 the certificate of dedication also needs to dedicate the easements as shown on this plat to the city - please add this. _ We arc asking that the additional row at the sw corner of tire site be dedicated with this document Please contact Wally INInSCOtt at 22 1 -6005 for the current legal description. d. Need to show all the easements that were previously dedicated on the plat. Need to show, these as existing or show that they are being vacated with this plat. i. Need to provide boundary lines between some of the different easements. G. Some casement lahels do not correspond to the labeling shown on the site plan. These two documents need to label the ca:semeuts the same and show the easements in the same locations. Site flan I . I Ile access easements are no longer being shown on the the site plan. Why? Assume that these easements are still needed by PPA. 2 W ill need to check the site plan against the plat once an updated plat is provided. _. Show the new property line based on the row, dedication for the roundabout. l� K HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE. COPIES OF REVISIONi atu m at — -- - c — —Drainage-Rcport W. t —� Utility Redline Utility Landscape /. �, DATE: March 21, 2002 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Mulberry Lemay Crossing, Lot 2 revisions All comments must be received by Sheri L. Wamhoff no later than: March 28, 2002 ❑ NN Comment L Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Mulberry and Lemay Crossings, Lot 2 I. The legals I received have been checked and are acceptable. I need dedication documents including attorney certification for the 3 new easements. Once all documentation is received I can let you know how much is needed for recording fees. 2. Utilty plans — sheet 3.00 — The curb on the west side of the internal drive needs to be put in place with this project to that there is a separation between the temporary pedestrian walk and the drive isle. In addition the KFC/ Taco Bells show tying into existing curb. Don't really care who builds it as long as it is shown being built. Since their plans do not go all the way to the southern drive at least a portion needs to be on these plans. The type III barricades are not to be skid mounted they need to be fixed in place so they can not be moved. 3. Utility plans — sheet 3.1 I - Need to bubble all changed values. You have just bubbled the number, that number in most cases has not changed. Need to bubble the value(s) that have changed. Have bubbled some that did not change. 4. Utility plans — sheet 4.12 — Provide a signature block. Since this is a brand new sheet it will be signed in the signature block. 5. An amendment to the Development Agreement will be forwarded for your review once I receive it back from our attorneys' office. 6. The easements in final format are needed before we will sign the utility plans. Signed utility plans, signed amendment agreement and checks for the easement filing fees are needed before the minor amendment can be approved. Date: <� Signature��� Please send copies of marked revisions _Plat _Site _Utility _Landscape (MAI SUBMIT MYLARS % City of Fort Collins "Si 8 DATE: February 19, 2002 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Mulberry Lemay Crossing Lot 2 This is a revision to the originally approved plans to accommodate parking lot and building size changes at the southwestern corner of the property. They have sithmitted every sheet of the plan set although not every sheet has changed. All comments must be received by Sheri L. Wamhoff no later than: March 6, 2002 V❑ N C-o' t 'roblems or Concerns (see below or attached) Mulbcriy and Lemay Crossings, Lot 2 1 . Legal for emergency access easement vacation — This is not an emergency access easement. It is only an access easement. correct the test and labels in the legal description and sketch and return. 2. See attached sketch of Utility Basements to be vacated. The blue area was area not included in the vacation request that was routed, but is provided within the legal provided. Since that area was not included in the original request I will need to route the rcqucst includim, that area if you still desire it to be a part ofthe vacation. IFyou do not wish to include it, please provide a new Icgal description that does not include that area. Otherwise let me know and I can route i1 for vacation request. The orange area is an are not included within the legals provided. If you wish to vacate this area provide a legal (It can be combined with the piece above or to the east of it). If not is will remain a ulila% etuement. _ See attached sketch of Emergency Accesses. "fhe orange areas represent areas that need to be dedicated as emergency access easements per Poudre Fire Authority. please provide dedication documents for this area. 4. Che legals received have been checked and other than those mentioned above they are acceptable. I need dedication documents including attorney certification for all new casements (see attached sample deed and attorney i Date: " Signature. i t / Please send copies 1/t of marked revisions _Pla — _Site CJhility Landscape — — ❑ NOCONIMF.NCS— SLBMIT iV[YLARS MRSO&Z Citv of Fort Collins 5. ceitification paragraph). Once all documentation is received t can let you know how much is needed for recording lees 6. Ltility plans --cover sheet- Why have the general notes changed? They need to remain as they were. Bubble the new sheet number and name. 7. Utilty plans - General - Remove the text from the revision blocks that does not apply to the revisions being made after approval of the plans to create room for the revisions to be listed. Bubble all changes to the plans from the original approved set. You have made changes to the line weights in some areas. Need to make sure that everything k readahe and reproducible. These plans will be used for both phases of construction. Provide original sienauaes in the signature blocks on all sheets but the new one. 3. I ti lit\ plans - sheet 3.00 - The ramp at the southeast corner of Lot 6 needs to be installed with Phase 1 work to provide sidewalk connections. Why not include the sidewalk along the north side of the entry drive off of Lemay since vuu will be putting in the landscaping and trees in this area it would make sense to put the walk in. It would create define an edge to the turf area. Add a note to the plan that states all work outside of Phase 1 boundary is part of Phase 11 work. show that a type ❑l barricade is to be placed at the end of the east paved drive. Make sure that the boundary includes cuough curb installation to support the landscaping shown to be put in with phase 1. 9. 1ltiliIN Plans - sheet 3.10 - missing a whole lot of information that was on the original plan and showing the addition of some new information. All areas that have changed need to be bubbled, including areas where items or Libels have been rennrved. to. Utility plans - sheet 3.1 I - Need to bubble all changed values. 1 I - Utility plans - sheet 4.10 -what happened to Section A and emergency spillway detail? Are they no longer needed? 'I le Phase line needs to encompass all work that is to occur in Phase 1, therefore it needs to go outside of the new grade lines for the pond as that work will need to be done with Phase I. All the construction note references in Phase 2 are gone. 12. utility plans - sheet 4.1 I - Bubble the entire new detail, notjust the label. 13. iltility plans sheet 4.12 - This is a new sheet nothing should be bubbled on this sheet. This sheet will be signed in the signature block as it has never been signed. 13. Utility plans - sheet 120 -The phase line needs to be labeled and needs to go around all work to be done in Phasc I_ Lost some lines and gained a few that were not there before. 15. Utility plans sheet 5.10 - Need to bubble the changes. Need to identify all work to be done with Phase I and identify any work or measures that need to be done with both phases. I6_ Utility plans - sheet 6.10 - need to bubble all changes including the labels in which the number has changed from the rust document. I T Utility plans - sheet 630 - Bubble all changes and make sure all line weights are dark enough to be seen and reproduced. I8- Utility plans -sheet6.31-bubble changes. I o. Iitility plans - sheet 7.10 - bubble changes. 20. Don't need to provide the sheets that do not have any changes with the next submittal. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: February 19, 2002 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Mulberry Lemay Crossing Lot 2 This is a revision to the originally approved plans to accommodate parking lot and building size changes at the southwestern corner of the property. They have submitted every sheet of the plan set although not every sheet has changed. All comments must be received by Sheri L. Wanihoff no later than: March 6, 2002 ❑umment 3roblems or Concerns (see below or attached) Mulbcrry and Lcmav Crossings, Lot 2 Legal fm cmergencv access easement vacation —This is not an emergency access easement. It is only an access easement Correct the text and labels in the legal description and sketch and return. Sec attached sketch of Utility Easements to be vacated. The blue area was area not included in the vacation request that was rotted, but is provided within the legal provided. Since that area was not included in the original request I will need to route the request including that area if von stilIdes ire it to be a part of the vacation. Ifyon do not wish to include it, please provide a new legal description that does not include that area. Otherwise let me know and I can rove it Ibr vacation request The orange area is an He not included within the legals provided. If Von wish to vucmc this area provide a Icgal (it can be combined with the piece above or to the cast of it). If not is will remain a utility casement. 3. See attached sketch of Emergency Accesses. -file orange areas represent areas that need to be dedicated as emergency access casements per Poudre fire Authority. please provide dedication documents for this area. 4_ "file locals received have been checked and other than those mentioned above they are acceptable. I need dedication docuntcn.s including attorney certification for all new easements (see attached sample deed and attorney i J/; ��� Date: Signatures Please send copies of marked revisions _Pla . _Site --OtilitY Landscape — ❑ NO C )MVlENCS — SUBuIIT MYLARS Citv of Fort Collins i, certification paragraph). Once all documentation is received 1 can let you know how much is needed for recording feeS. 6. t Ida%, plans -cover sheet- Why have the general notes changed? They need to remain as they were. Bubble the new sheet number and name. 7. t Rilty plans - Genend - Remove the test frotn the revision blocks that does not apply to the revisions being made atler approval of the plans to create room for the revisions to be listed. Bubble all changes to the plans from the of inal approved set. You have made changes to the line weights in some areas. Need to make sure that evcrvthine is readable and reproducible- These plans will be used for both phases of construction. Provide of ieinal sienamres in the signature blocks on all sheets but the new one. 8. Utility plans -sheet 3.00 -The ramp at the southeast corner of Lot 6 needs to be installed with Phase I work to provide sidewalk connections. Why not include the sidewalk along the north side of the entry drive off of Lemay since you will be pulling in the landscaping and trees in this area it would make sense to put the walk in. It would create detlne an edge to the mrf area. Add a note to the plan that states all work outside of Phase 1 boundary is part of Phase I I work. Show that a type Ill barricade is to be placed at the end of the east paved drive. Make sure that the bountlary includes enough curb installation to support the landscaping shown to be put in with phase L 9. t Rility Plans - sheet 3.10 - missing a whole lot of information that was on the original plan and showing the addition ofsome new infixnretion. All areas that have changed need to be bubbled, includin e areas where items or labels have heen removed. 10. Utility planssheet3.11 -Need to bubble all changed values. 11. Utility plans - sheet 4.10 - what happened to Section A and emergency spillway detail? Are they no longer needed? "fhc Phase line needs to encompass all work that is to occur in Phase 1, therefore it needs to _ao outside of the new grade lines for the pond as that work will need to be done with Phase L All the construction note references in Phase 2 are gone. 11. Utility plans - sheet 4.1 1 - Bubble the entire new detail, notjust the label. 13- utility plans sheet 4.12 - I his is a new sheet nothing should be bubbled on this sheet. This sheet will be signed in the signature block as it has never been signed. 14. Utility plans -sheet 420 the phase line needs to be labeled and needs to go around all work to be done in Phase 1. Lost some lines and gained a few that were not there before. 1 �. Utility plans - sheet S.10 -Need to bubble the changes. Need to identify all work to be done with Phase I and identify any work or measures that need to be done with both phases. 16. Utility plans - sheet 6.10 - need to bubble all changes including the labels in which the number has changed from the first document. 17. Utility plans - sheet 6.30 - Bubble all changes and make sure all line weights are dark enough to be seen and reproduced. IS Utility plans - sheet 6.31-bubble changes. 19. l Itility plans - sheet 7.10 - bubble changes. 20. Don't need to provide the sheets that do not have anv changes with the next submittal. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: October 13, 2000 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96E Mulberry Lemay Crossings, Lot 2— Type II LUC All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, November 1, 2000 ElNo Comment EProblems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** Nlulberrs, Lemav Crossing 2'd Filing October 31. 2000 "Phese plans need to reflect the changes made to the site by the roundabout project. Thai project has affected the grades and the pond This applies to the utility, site and landscape plans. Plat 1. the plat was received for the first time and was not routed to all the utilities and effected entities. Once revised the plat needs to be submitted for review. 2 "I he certificate of dedication also needs to dedicate the easements as shown on this plat to the city - please add this. 3. We are asking that the additional row at the sw corner of the site be dedicated with this document. Please contact Wall, Nhucott at 21_ 1-6605 for the current legal description. 1 Need to show all the easements that were previously dedicated on the plat Need to show these as existing or show that they are being vacated with this plat. 5. Need to provide boundary lines between some of the different easements. 6. Some casement labels do not correspond to the labeling shown on the site plan. These two documents need to label the casements the same and show the casements in the same locations. Site Plan I Show the sight distance easement on this plan. _ Do not label the casements as proposed as they will be easements upon the approval and recording of these documents. See notes for some discrepancies between the plat and the site plan. Date: 1 31cc Signature. CHECKHERIi-IFYOUW1R1-T0RFMVFT0?TSDFRliV19W — — Plat `t Site — Urainagc Report _ Other Utility _ Redl ne Utili Landscape �� REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: July 5, 2000 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96E Mulberry-Lemay Crossing, P.U.D. Lot 2 — Final LDGS All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE" Mulberry Lemay Crossing, 2nd filing July 24, 2000 Plat • You are not replating with this project? • Will either need to replat or provide the easements by separate document that are needed for the water and sewer mains, stormwater facilities, and for all the other utilities to access and serve the site and buildings (i.e. PSCo, Cable, US West, Light and Power). One solution is to provide all the area outside of the building envelopes as a utility easement. The plat needs to be submitted for review or the deeds of dedication need to be submitted prior to being able to schedule this project for hearing. Date: " Signature:-- - 1 i CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site _ Drainage Rep _ Other Utility _ Redline Ugly _ Landscape f �� 34 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Take out the words "and sidewalk" in 9' utility easement note, all sheets. 35 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Add the words "On -Site" to the curb & gutter details. All sheets. 36 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Overall Utility Plan Sheets: Provide station, critical elevation, and dimension of all existing and proposed utility and/or drainage structures. 37 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Site Plan/Utility/Landscape: What is happening at the trash enclosure? How does this work with the sidewalk? 38 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Site Plan: Dimension sidewalk. 39 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Site Plan: Take out the words "and sidewalk" in 9' utility easement note. 40 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Landscape Plan: Label various items on landscape plan. Please see redlines. 41 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Landscape Plan: Label utility(?) easement on the East Magnolia side of the project. 42 Issue Contact Susan Joy Landscape Plan: Correct the 15' easement label. G1 � 2 QZ Sig ure Da CHECK HERE ' ISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat ZSite _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility \ Redline Utility 'Z-Landscape 4 of REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: March 14, 2000 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96E Mulberry — Lemay Crossing, Filing two, Lot 2 — Type II — Final (LDGS) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, April 5, 2000 No Conunent PVro I rere ns or Concerns (see bellow **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES Mulberry Lemay Crossing, 2"d filing or attached) FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** April 7, 2000 Site Plan The response to prior site plan comment # 1 was that "dimensions have been added to the site plan to •ensure proper placement of these tree grates" in reference to the walk and tree grate area south of Retail F. I don't see this on the site plan?? • Need to show the easements on the site plan. Need to make sure that the building envelopes as shown do not encroach into the easements. This is needed since the buildign envelopes are not shown on the plat. Utility Plans Will check the elevations at the entrance drives against the first filing on the next submittal, as the elevations may change slightly due to the change in the entrance radii. Plat You are not replating with this project? Will either need to replat or provide the easements on the first filing plat that are needed for the water and sewer mains, stormater facilities, and for all the other utilities to access and serve the site and w buildings (i.e. PSCo, Cable, US West, Light and Power). One solution is to provide all the area outside of the building envelopes as a utility easement. DC}{ECK `7HEftEIF YOUWLSH TC Signature / � Plet site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility Redline Utility landscape �� PROJECT i..fti COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Callins Current Plannina- DATE: October 6, 1999 TO: Engineering/Pavement PROJECT: #36-96E Mulberry and Lemay Crossing, Filing 2, Lot 2 — Final LDGS All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting;: November 3, 1999 l j Date: ��•� - ``L5� Signature:` � 'r ) r CHECK HERE,IFYOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Citv of Fort Collins lArqm PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins C'nrrent PlanninE DATE: October 6, 1999 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #36-96E Mulberry and Lemay Crossing, Filing 2, Lot 2 — Final LDGS All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: Mulberry Lemay Crossing, Filing 2, Lot 2 No Plat was received for review Site Plan November 3, 1999 November 7, 1999 • Are minimum clear sidewalk requirements being met where there is parking overhang onto the curb and there arc tree wells in the sidewalk. • Pedestrian ramp details - UtilAV plans reference handicap ramp types A, 6, C and D. HC Parking space laynut - is the curb alone here a flush curb or raised curb - The wall with railing- where is this at' Not identified anywhere. Landscape plan • Need to show fug hvdrant inlet locations and manhole locations on this sheet and show how the landscaping works with them_ Appears to be a few cordials as shown. Utility plans • Revise the general notes as indicated. • Provide cav signature blocks on all sheets. • Existing topo plan -see comments on die lust fis ling plan • Sac plan C3 00 - not identifying all ramp types, please label them - provide more detail on the sidewalk that goes between the detention ponds out Cn Mulbn.v Street what does a erns, section look :ike' Whal are the slopes, a railing may he needed here. -shnw the umlherry design in accordance with revised first filing plans_ • Gadaw Plan C I.10 -some et the islands are not labeled as far as curb type - haw does the transition from curb to flush curb occur and where'' - In Front of retail I , and I :ntd I there appears to be a pull out area. Where s the curb in this area and is that what it is- it is not clear. -need a detail for the thuh curb • for 2 Drainage plan C4 20 - the curb details on this sheet do not match the ones in the back (missing some dimensions) also need detail for thuh curb. • Overall utility Plan C6.10- Would probably be a good idea to show the tree grate locations on this plan to vcrifv there is not a conflict between service locations and tree placement. • Details - handicap parking detail - label the curb type on this detail. would be a good place to identity the transition point from raised curb to flush curb., handicap ramp detail type D- `A'Iwt is the square thing in the center ofthe island, dimensions' , onsite curb and gutter details show a type l3 integral concrete oth dctml - this is not rctercnced anywhere. is it being used'- hollard detail - where is this heir.- used" There is only retcracnce to a lighted hollard on ehect C3.00 and a detail tot tins is teund on the site plan., • Provide City curb gutter and sidewalk details its as handicap ramp details. 'I hese are needed if there is any damaged existing curb, gutter and walk adjacent to this sue_ Sec general note #II. Date: // Signatun�� ��� i CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Alklqml ^<• Plat (Y--,�ite Drainage Report _Other }Utility (�)[2edline Utility Landscape city of Fort Collins Matthew Pridemore Architekton 398 S. Mill Ave. #301 Tempe, AZ 85281 Ph: (480) 894-4637 Fx: (480) 894-4638 October 22, 2001 Ted Sheppard Chief Planner Current Planning 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fart Collins, CO 80522-0580 Mr. Sheppard, am writing in regards to the KFC/Taco Bell project at the Mulberry/Lemay Crossings development. This letter is in response to your written comments dated 8/29/01 and are as follows: I. Per Fric Bracke's memo dated 9/11/01 the revised traffic study requirement has hcen waived for the KFC/Taco Bell project. A copy of the memo has been a[tachcd to [his respunsc ICItCr. 2. We are matching approved civil plans for the overall development. Given the Developer's construction schedule all improvements will be in place hefore construction hegins on the KFC/Paco Bell project so that interim improvements will not be necessary. 3. The parking for the overall development has been revised to match the approved layout Ibr filing two. Please see Slit. C2. 4. The sidewalks have been dimensioned on the site plan. Please sec Slit. C2. 5. The legal description on the site plan has been verified with the plat for tiling two. 6 The Stormwater comments have been addressed per the written and red -lined comments. The construction schedules have been reviewed and the improvements will be in place before work begins on the KFC/Paco Bell project. I iowever, the 48-inch storm sewer has already been installed so temporary measures will not be required. AP r.1dl n.., 501 L-uq„, 11L 8S2B1 "I i I I I.. 1 480 894 46 VI 7. The East L+arimer County Water District redlined comments have been addressed. 8. Per Xcel Encrgy's requirements trees will not be planted within four feet of a gas line. 9. The tansformcr location has been revised so that it is within ten feet of a hard surface. Please see Sht. C2. 10. Per City requirements the Street Oversizing Fee will be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. 1 I. An 8' sidewalk has been added along the south property line, which is hall -on hall oft of our property. Please see Sht. C2. 12. The drive -through entrance has been reconfigured to eliminate congestion at the main entrance to the property off of the main interior drive -aisle. Please see Sht. C2. 13. The inset panels on the KFC and Taco Bell towers have been changed from E.LF.S. to masonry. Please see Slits. A4 and A4.1. 14. The "KFC red" color has been revised to it more muted "Colonial red". Please scc Slits. A4 and A4.1. 15. The Taco Bell purple has been removed from the exterior paint schedule. The color will be confined to the signage. 16. The gash enclosure has been revised to accommodate containers for recycled materials. Please see Sht. C2. IT The site plan title as been changed to "Mulberry-Lemay Crossings, Phase Three, KFGTaco Bell, Portion of Lot 6, Filing Two." Please see Sht. C2_ 18. The zoning call -out has been revised on the site plan. Please see Sht. C2. 19. A building envelope is indicated on the site plan. Please see Sht. C2. 20. The property line has been called out on the site plan. Please see Sht. C2. Hopefully, this letter along with the accompanying revised plans has adequately addressed all of your questions and concerns. 11 you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call at (480) 894-4637. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Matthew Pridemore Archilcklon Account Manager