HomeMy WebLinkAboutK MART PLAZA - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-11PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current
DATE: January 28, 1998 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: # 38-97 KMart Plaza Type I (LUC) PDP/FC
PLANNER: Ted Shepard
ENGINEER: Michael K. Dean
All comments must be received by: 1/28/98
Please provide greater detail on the utility plans, as is they are difficult to review due to the lack of information and
over crouding of the relevant information.
Make corrections to the General Notes as shown on the engineering redlines.
Cover sheet layout needs additional information as shown on the redlines. A Title Block located along the far right
of the sheet including Engineers Name, Project Name, Project Number, a 3.5" high by 4.5" wide Signature Blo:.. is
needed in the lower right comer of each sheet.
It is unnecessary to sign and stamp the Utility Plans until after the City of Fort Collins Engineering Department
requests Mylar originals for this project. After the original Mylars have been approved by the City of Fort Collins
Engineering Department. I will return them to you and request a copy of the original Mylars and 4 signed and
stamped bluelines. To have signed and stamped preliminary utility plans circulating prior to the final approved plan
could place you in a precarious situation.
Provide more distinct differentiation between existing conditions and proposed construction.
Include a sheet similar to the Horizontal Control Plan with the Utility Plans.
Clarify Legend to include what is revelant to this project this should be included on all relevant sheets.
Provide elevations alone, the proposed curb and gutter at spots necessary to conclude if ponding will occur. Label
curb and gutter, I believe you intend to use out fall curb and gutter if so also provide a detail.
**See redlines for additional comments
Date:�t9g Signature:!
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
,/Plat /Site _DrainageReport Other D A. roFo
,/Utility ✓Redline Utility Landseape
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be
forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to
review this request.
Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with
the submittal of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any
questions or concerns that are related to the comments. If you would like to
schedule a meeting, please call me as soon as possible.
Revisions may be submitted at any time. With the submittal of revisions, please
include the enclosed redlined plans. The number of revisions required is
attached.
Best regards,
eanne A. Harter, AICP
City Planner
xc: Mark McCullum
File/Project Planner
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
wv
DATE: 26, September 1998 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: #38-97 Fuller's Texaco, (LUC) Type I PDP
PLANNER: Leanne Harter
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments must be received by: 09/02/98
General Comments:
More detailed comments will be mentioned below.
Utility Plan Comments:
Cover Sheet; Sheet I of 5:
d--- See redlined comments
2,-There is a new vertical control listing for the City of Fort Collins which does not include
fire hydrant benchmark descriptors as being accurate. Therefore, the benchmark
descriptors for this project should come from the new vertical control listing. It has been
discussed tp allow a tire_ hydrant benchmark descriptor if it id referenced from the new
vertical control list. J,A i ,,- - A = E.M. G -4v; ,: -794-
Utility Plan; Sheet 2 of 5:
3. An offsite utility easement should be dedicated for the sanitary sewer service. See
rcdllnedcomments. Royi�Btif�, yJp� ¢��",4 4-a no'f A- -e e-,'e"Oro
S owi'�wea+ !°:-7�/e��, e,{ Own; dti '%fie �o.o�1 Leis✓.
4. See redlined comments.
Detail Sheet; 4 of 5:
5. See redlined comments.
Plat:
6. An offsite utility easement should be dedicated for the sanitary sewer service. See
redlined comments. S e z i�- 3 4
P.D.P. Plan: Site and Landscape Plan Comments:
7. See comments made for the utility plans.
8. See redlined comments that do not match the utility plans.
Date: i Signature:
Please send copies of marked revisions Plat Site
Utility _Landscape
City of Fort Collins
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: ember 28, 1998 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: #38-97 Fuller's Texaco, (LUC) Type I PDP/rC_
P-LANNE1 t -
ENGINEER: Mark McCallum
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting:
Utility Plan Comments:
1Y The cross -pan should be shown on the utility plan. sheet 2 of 5. f pled F41
i
Date: ��� Signature:", /C �
Please send copies of marked revisions flat Site
ifJtility andscape rr
City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: February 27, 1998 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT:#38-97 Kmart Plaza, Fuller's Texaco - Type II - PDP
PLANNER: Leanne. Harter
ENGINEER: Michael K. Dean, P.E.
All comments must be received by: March 25, 1998
O Add additional notes as shown on the redlines to the General Notes.
0 Include a Plat of the site proposed for this development in the Utility Plans.
( even if it's for reference only )
0 Provide an additional reference elevation in the project benchmark in accordance with the
Black Bolt Survey.
0 Provide a Legend in the Utility Plans to identify line types and symbols.
0 The access to West Drake Road will be limited to Right In/ Right Out in the near future in
order to accommodate; stacking needs for the East Bound Left Turn Lane from Drake Road
to College Ave..
0 The site boundary shown in the TIS does not match the Site Plan.
Date: 3/24 Aqg Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
,/Plat , lSite _Drainage Report Other &a,ifp T1S
xf6liliry ✓kedline Utility iandseape
Commun. Planning and Environmental S. ;ices
Current Planning m t k!p
City of Fort Collins
April 3, 1998
Carr Beiker
117 E. Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Dear Carr:
City staff has reviewed the Kmart Plaza, Fuller's Texaco Project Development
Plan, #38-97, and offers the following comments:
1. The Zoning Department offered the following:
a) Pleas show the handicapped ramps at parking spaces and the
sidewalks.
b) A trash enclosure shall be provided for the Texaco lot.
c) As the project is not located within the Neighborhood Sign District,
and therefore, you are not required to show the wall sign elevations.
2. Comments from Building Inspections are attached.
3. Comments from the Poudre Fire Authority are attached.
4. Comments from Water Conservation Specialist are attached.
5. Comments from the Engineering Department are attached.
6. Comments for the Stormwater Utility are attached.
7. Comments from the Water/Wastewater Utility are attached.
8. Comments from the Transportation Planning Department are attached.
9. Comments from Traffic Operations are attached.
10. The Current Planning Department offered the following comments:
�81 Forth College :Ac(,nue • P.O. Box 980 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (070) 221-o750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
a) Please add a general note on details of the lighting. The photometric
plan submitted shows that the lighting exceeds the levels detailed in
Section 3.2.4(D) of the Land Use Code. Standards in that section
state that "Maximum on -site lighting levels shall not exceed ten (10)
foot-candles, except for loading and unloading platforms where the
maximum lighting level shall be twenty (20) foot-candles" and "light
levels measured twenty (20) feet beyond the property line of the
development site (adjacent to residential uses or public rights -of -way)
shall not exceed one -tenth (0.1) foot-candle as a direct result of the
on -site lighting." Therefore, in order to comply with the requirements
of the Land Use Code, it is necessary to do one or all of the following:
reduce the wattage, provide high-pressure sodium light sources, or
further direct the lighting downwards. This section does have the
alternative compliance option that may be submitted by the applicant.
Please reference Section 3.2.4(E) of the Land Use Code for details on
the section.
b) Please provide a detail of the light poles to be used, including wattage,
type of light source, type of cover, and height.
c) Please show the lights on the site/landscape plan.
d) Foundation plantings are required along the south elevation and east
elevation according to the requirements of Section 3.2.1(E)(a)(d) of the
Land Use Code.
e) The proposed removal of the junipers along Drake Avenue does not
comply with the screening requirements of Section 3.2.1(E)(4)(a-b)
Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping, and would need to be replaced
with other plantings in order to comply with the requirements of this
section. The requirements of Section 3.2.1(E)(4)(b) state:
Screening. Parking lots with six (6) or more spaces shall be
screened from adjacent uses and from the street. Screening from
residential uses shall consists of a fence of a wall six (6) feet in
height in combination with plant material and of sufficient opacity to
block at least seventy-five (75) percent of light from vehicle
headlights. Screening from the street and all nonresidential uses
shall consist of a wall, fence planter, earthen berm, plant material
or a combination of such elements, each of which shall have a
minimum height of thirty (30) inches. Such screening shall extend
a minimum of seventy (70) percent of the length of the street
frontage of the parking lot and also seventy (70) percent of the
length of any boundary of the parking lots that abuts any
nonresidential use. Openings in the required screening shall be
knitted for such features as access ways or drainage ways.
Where screening from the street is required, plans submitted for
review shall include a graphic depiction of the parking lot screening
as seen from the street. Plant material used for the required
screening shall achieve required opacitV in its winter seasonal
condition within three (3) years of construction of the vehicular use
area to be screened.
f) There is some confusion as to whether the existing Jiffy Lube site is or
is not included within the boundaries of the project development plan.
Please clarify this issue. If the Jiffy Lube site is included, additional
issues will need to be addressed, including requirements for
landscaping and the building and project compatibility standards.
g) Please label the landscape plan as the landscape plan and number all
the sheets.
h) The pedestrian crossings at both access points will be required to be
defined according to the requirements of the Land Use Code as
outlined in Section 3.2.2(C)(5)(b).
i) At this stage, staff would not support the request for alternative
compliance to increase the proposed number of parking spaces. The
purpose of the section of the Land Use Code must be addressed and
additional rationale behind the request for more parking must be
provided.
j) Please provide a direct pedestrian connection from Drake Road
through the two sites (shown on the redlined plans). The area wherein
is crossing any drive aisles must be defined according to the
requirements of the Land Use Code.
k) Please show all bicycle parking
1) Staff strongly encourages the applicant to pursue the reverse layout
mode and essentially redesign the site so that it complies with the
requirements of the Land Use Code, Section 3.5.3. It may be
possible that the building could be rotated 90 degrees and would
accomplish the purposes of the standard without necessitating a
request for modification. There appears to be potential conflict
between the entrance off of Drake and the first access point into the
site. The redesign could accommodate the entrance further to the
north, and allow for the building to meet the build -to standard, as well
as better accommodate pedestrian circulation from Drake Road, and
provide space for water quality treatment (which is required by
Stormwater Utility). If the applicant decides that redesign in not an
option, please be aware that it is likely that staff will not recommend
approval of the modification request to the Planning and Zoning Board
as the request does not demonstrate that the plan as submitted
accomplishes the purposes of the Land Use Code equally well or
better than a plan designed according to the requirements of the Code.
The request for modification needs to address the criteria outlined in
Section 2.7.1 of the Land Use Code.
m) Please demonstrate how the pedestrian/automobile interface works at
the exit of the car wash.
n) Please provide a pedestrian connection to the retail uses to the north
of the existing Jiffy Lube.
o) Please contact Tim Buchanan, City Forester, regarding the removal of
existing trees on site and any tree replacement/mitigation that will
follow.
p) Please show the square footage of each building.
q) Please add the zoning to the vicinity map.
r) There should be additional notes regarding bicycle parking, changes
to the site necessitating a minor amendment approval, and other
standard general notes.
s) Please remove the signature block for the Administrative Hearing
Officer. However, if the applicant does decide to pursue the reverse
mode layout, a modification request is not necessary and the project
remains an administrative review rather than review by the Planning
and Zoning Board.
t) According the Section 3.2.1(D)(1)(c ),"Canopy shade trees shall
constitute at least fifty (50) percent of all tree plantings." Therefore,
you are required to place more canopy shade trees on the site and
reduce the number of ornamental trees. Alternative compliance is
available for Section 3.2.1, and any request for such must comply with
Section 3.2.1(N).
u) The trash collection area shall be screened according to the
requirements of the Land Use Code. Please provide shrubbery to
provide additional screening.
v) Please provide a detail of the trash enclosure and fence.
w) What does a "subtle combo" of beige and tan mean? Please provide
color samples.
x) Please specify the materials to be used for the canopy.
y) Please see the attached red -lines for additional comments.
11. The Advance Planning Department offered the following comments:
a) The site plan needs to be rearranged to better meet the purposes of
(1) Building Standards regarding WHAT the building faces onto and
what the street front consists of; and (2) Site Planning standards for
pedestrian circulation and access.
b) The building as shown is completely surrounded by parking lots and
driveways. The canopy along the public street would add to an
already overwhelming image of auto -related commercial uses. The
plaza is emphasized in the letter but it appears to be a leftover strip
isolated from streets and buildings by parking lots and driveways for
the gas pumps and car wash. See the enclosed sketch diagram of an
alternative approach which makes progress toward meeting the Code
requirements and purposes. It looks like it might be helpful to meet
with the applicant to discuss the many competing objectives and the
need for a fundamentally different layout than the one submitted.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be
forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to
review this request.
Please provide a. written response to each of the above stated comments with
the submittal of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any
questions or concerns that are related to the comments. If you would like to
schedule a meeting, please call me as soon as possible.
Revisions may be submitted at any time. With the submittal of revisions, please
include the enclosed redlined plans. The number of revisions required is
attached.
}Best regards, ,
Leanne A. Harter, AICP
City Planner
xc: Mike Dean
File/Project Planner
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 15, 1998 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT:438-97 Kmart Plaza, Fuller's Texaco - Type II - PDP
PLANNER: Leanne Harter
ENGINEER: Michael K. Dean, P.E.
All comnients must be received by: July 8, 1998
Provide signed Easement Dedication documents with exhibits, when you have them
available, to be checked and approved by the City. ? 4 4�4 [4r6.. f d-^ /'�•� �
eyh"I.h i++-46$.A. ti,Ne t. T!w aw-6+ 44r ♦,j,eA v1ec--•-1
✓Provide a note on the site and Utility Plans stating, the access to West Drake Road will be
limited to Right Ini Right Out in the near future. S a t d'.l -o4 e.
The site boundary shown in the T.I.S. does not match the Site Plan, revise the T.I.S.-
Plot the tumin;_ radii and provide a scetch of how the tanker truck will access the site.
*** See redlines for additional comments.***
Date: Taw 9, 1776 Signature:'
CIfECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
,/Plat _✓Site _Drainage Report Other T�,��Rnon
/ of TAA)KEA TkoUl
.,�t/tility ,/kerlline Utility YLanrlscape
Cornmu a Planning and Environmental
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
September 8, 1998
Carr Beiker
117 E. Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Dear Carr:
•vices
City staff has reviewed the revisions submitted for the Kmart Plaza, Fuller's
Texaco Project Development Plan, #38-97, and offers the following comments:
1. The Zoning Department offered the following:
a) Please remove the topo lines from the final site plan.
b) I don't see any building lighting on the main building or the gas island
canopy. Will there be any? Please show on the elevations.
2. Comments from Stormwater Utility are attached.
3. Comments ffrom the Engineering Department are attached.
4. Comments Ifor the Stormwater Utility are attached.
5. Comments from the Water/Wastewater Utility are attached.
6. Comments from the Transportation Planning Department are attached.
(For your records, this Division provided copies of previous comments as
well.)
7. The Current Planning Department offered the following comments:
a) Please add additional language under General Note #1 that the
lighting under the canopy will be recessed, and that the average
maximum of the lighting on the site does not exceed 10 foot-candles in
accordance with the requirements of the Land Use Code.
b) Please label the materials proposed to be used on the canopy (i.e.,
brick columns.)
c) Please show all lighting on the elevations.
281 :Cnrth College A%enuc • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 8052_'-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020