The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHARBOR WALK AT THE LANDINGS PUD - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2004-08-09CITY OF FORT COLLINS ENGINEERING SERVICES July 9, 1936 Tom Livingston Osprey Homes, Inc. 155 Boardwalk Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Harbor .Walk P.U.D. Dear From: It has come to my attention that during construction of the sanitary sewer by Loveland Excavating the sidewalk, which is part of the South Lemay Improvement District, was damaged by heavy equipment traffic. This area is at the northt-,est corner of the intersection of South Lernay Avenue and Harbor Walk Drive. We feel that this repair should be made as soon as possible in order not to delay final acceptance. If you have any questions, please contact me at 221-6605. Sincerely, David S. Melberg Construction Inspector f.� ENGINEERING SERVICES 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins• Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6605 CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION January 27, 1487 t,ary Powell HM;, Real Fstate Company 40U Fast Hcrsetooth Road, Suite 30p Fort Collins, Co 80525 Dear Piary, Staff has reviewed the Final PUD suhmittal for Harbor Ualk and has the foiloc:inq_ cocments. Revisions reflecting these comments are due by Friday, February 6, 19g7. Colored renderings and reructions of all plans should be submitted by Thursday, February 12 and all signed documents inclucing plat, site plan and development aqreement should be submitted by February 19. 1. The site plan should show typical rear and side yard setbacks. 2. Indicate wicth and length of parking spaces in the landscaped island (spaces may be 6.5' x 181). 3. Site plan note Q should he removed. 4. The Warren Lake trunk sewer repay will be assessed on each dwelling unit. 5. Mountain Pell has questioned the adequacy of the easement adjacent to Lots 1 and 31. Tnaireering also has concerns about reducing the frontage casement to 6 feet in width. 6. More information on the design of project entrances is needed. Profiles of the existing street should be provided and curb returns should be shown. 7. The overall utility plan should show the R-0-V7, sidewalks, and retaining wall dimensions. A Elan, vied: of the retainina wall should be on this plan. S. Legal Staff has questioned the appropriateness of an encroachment permit for the retaining wall. The permit would have to be issued to a responsible party, and there is no assurance that the owner's association will exist in the future. Tranferring responsibility to individual lot owners becomes rather complex. Let's inet with all the interested parties to resolve this issue. 9. Gates in fencing for fire access should he shown on plans. nCA/CI I DnACNT DI AKIN KjJ nimQirIN Pagv 2 tkry Dowell 10. The landscape play should note thatt the owners association will maintain all landcaping, including that in the R-04% The development agreement should indicate the sane about the planter/retaining wall. 11. The City Forester asks that a note regarding_ a Planting Permit be placed on the plans (see attached). 12. I question use of Bristlecone Pine in the planters because of their mature size. Minimum size for deciduous trees is 1 3/4 " caliper, for evergreens it is 6'. 13. The landscape plan should reflect loss of the pool. 14. A typical landscape plan for areas adjacent to the buildings dust be Trovided or these plantings must be shown on the overall plan. 15. A preliminary condition of approval was that Unit 4,12 setback from Harbor Walk Drive to increased. We need to address this before returning_ to P F Z for final approval. Let me know if you have questions. iters in more detail. Singereryl Elaine Senior City Planner cc: Mike Davis Ton Peterson Nike Herzig Jim Newell I'll see you on Friday to discuss these CITY OF FORT COLLINS OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 4, 1987 Pat Manahan c/o Taranto, Stanton & Tagge 309 Inverness Way South Englewood, CO 80112 Dear Pat: This letter is to inform you of the conclusions made from the utility coor- dination meeting held February 2, 1987 regarding the utility easements for Harbor Walk P.U.D.. Below is a list of the items as we discussed them. (1) The utility easements along the back of lots 1 through 11 is acceptable with all utilities as shown. (2) The plat should be corrected to show a 32 foot street width from flow line to flow line, and the 13 foot utility easement must begin along the back of the walk. The required utility width is 13 feet without the sidewalk in the easement. This shall be the case for the frontage of every lot in this P.H.D. except lot 11. The repre- sentatives of the utilities in the meeting stated it would be acceptable to reduce the frontage easement on lot 11 provided the Developer coordinates the location of the driveway and the neces- sary utility services for that particular lot. The coordination should be done for water and sewer, natural gas, and electrical services. (3) The easement along Harbor Walk Drive and the side of lot 31 will work as shown provided there is a minimum of 4 feet of City Right - of -Way between the back of the sidewalk and the property line. This easement should be shown with a dashed line similar with the other easements, and show the dimensions. JL- p J.. ia... ..,..Y.l i :.".ii. +i, FFk s-.'�',Sa?.5� :ar .H"..tti si �nd,AI- ;_ 9 ux_. �,a a . OFFICE OF DEVELOPMEN- 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221 6750 SERVICES, PLANNING Page 2 (4) The side easement should be chanced easement of lot 1 This will be the lots 1 through 11. between Harbor Walk Drive and lot 1 (Tract. "B") to show the continuation of the 13 foot frontage to the City Right -of -Way of Harbor Walk Drive. entry point for both gas and electric servicing These were the utility easements discussed in the coordination meeting, and they represent the areas of concern for the installation of the utilities. Due to the nature of this development it is very important that the Devel- oper and the individual contractors work very closely with all the differ- ent utilities through out the entire construction phase. If you have any questions about the content of this letter or any other issues concerning this project please contact me so they can be resolved. Sincerely, Jim Newell, Civil Engineer I JN/bh xc: Elaine Kleckner Mary Dowell Gary Huett Lou Phillippe Doug Martine Tom Gathmann Mike Herzig Bob Snow CITY OF FORT COLLINS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — ENGINEERING March 2, 1987 Mr. Dave Simpson Loveland Excavating 1425 S. Lincoln Avenue Loveland, Colorado 80537 Re: Waterline - Harbor Walk P.U.D. Dear Dave: This is to inform you that after the City's request back in August 1986 to raise the fire hydrant at Lemay Avenue and Harbor Walk Drive, please be advised this work has been completed by your company and has been tested and accepted by the City. Sincerely, Craig FFaarver Construction Inspector Y FFv=I r;PMENT SFRV'.CSS — 300 LaPorte Ave. PO Box 580 Fort Coll,ns, Colorado 80522 (303) 221 6605 E i. G'P�FF HNG CITY OF FORT COLLINS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — 6'JGINEFPING August 27, 1957 Mr. Walt Barclay United Bank Asset Quality Control 401 South College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado SC524 Re: Harbor Walk Estates Dear Mr. Barclay: Harbor Walk Estates, a Planned United Development, has been inspected and initially accepted by the City pending the normal contractor one-year warranty period. Please be informed that this acceptance does not relieve the developer or builder of his responsibility to repair any damage v;hich may occur as a result of hone -building activity. Sincerely, (2, d�' rl � 5 David Stringer Chief Construction Inspector DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — ENGINEERING 300 LaPorte Ave. • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins. Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6605