HomeMy WebLinkAboutGREENS AT COLLINDALE PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-09PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: March 19, 1996 DEPT: Engineering - Ping
PROJECT: the Greens @ Collindale PUD - Preliminary
PLANNER: Mitch Haas
All comments, must be received by: March 29,1996
❑ No Problems
EM Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
GREENS AT COL.LINDALE P.U.D. - Preliminary
Traffic Study:
• Adding less than 1 % to the existing traffic on Lemay Avenue
• Long range P.M. peak hour at Ticonderoga projects level of service D - discuss
with Transportation staff
Drainage Report:
• Notes that overland flow from lots is conveyed in the streets to the detention
pond. However, there is insufficient detail on the utility, grading, and drainage
plans to veirify the manner in which those flows are conveyed. The plans do not
show adequate detail to show curb and gutter and crosspans. One typical cross
section of the proposed private streets is shown on the utility plans, but it is
insufficient information. It is likely that there are conflicts between the proposed
concrete pan and manhole locations.
Date: 4/'Z� %1� Signature: YA�A
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLAT
COPIES OF REVISIONS SITE
LANDSCAPE
l' UTILITY
3. Please remove general notes numbers 10, 11, and 12 altogether. These notes do not apply
because these plans are the Final submittal.
4. Please add a note stipulating that "All private drives contain public access easements."
5. Please remove note 99 as note 91 covers the same information. By the way, "plat" is spelled with
one"C'
The parking count in the Land Use Breakdown shows 29 on street stalls. I count just 25. Please
double-check your count and, if necessary, correct it.
II. - - - LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS - - -
A. The landscape plan does not match the site plan. Please read note #16 and ensure that it is being
adhered to. For instance, the decks on the south side of the structures on Lots 19-24 are shown
to extend further to the south than they do on the site plan. On the landscape plan, these decks
are shown to clearly encroach upon the easements. This will need to be adjusted.
B. The deck on the east side of the structure on Lot 17 is shown to extend beyond the property line
and into the detention pond. This must be corrected.
C. The hammer -head turn -around between Lots 16 and 17 is shown to be in the detention pond.
This situation will not work and must be corrected.
D. Please label all trees along the south property line in a manner that will stipulate that they are to
be trees with a minimum caliper of three inches (3"), in accordance with note #15.
E. At the hammer head turn -around between Lots 24 and 25 (along Lemay), please fill in the gaps
between the shrubs in order to make this row of shrubs a continuous screen between Lemay and
the turn -around.. Also, please change these shrubs to a taller species than Scandia Juniper, such
as Mugo Pine, '.Blue Star Juniper, Old Gold Juniper, Pfitzer Juniper, Pfitzer Compact Juniper, or
similar.
F. In a similar vein to comment " B" above, please screen the northwest corner of the three -car
parking area adjacent to Lot 25. The parking area across the street from Lots 3 and 4 needs to
be screed from the Lemay Avenue right-of-way with a continuous row of 3-4 foot tall evergreen
shrubs.
G. Please place as many service lines in the drives and driveways as possible. Also, please put the
meter pits and curb stops on landscaped areas and maintain the minimum separation distances,
as stipulated in note 914.
R The water line! shown in front of Lots 1, 2, and 3 must be in the street. It is currently shown
under the parkway strips. Please adjust this accordingly.
1. Please revise note #10 to read as follows: "Any changes in plant locations and/or overall
quantities required by site conditions during construction will be prohibited unless such changes
have been reviewed and approved by the City of Fort Collins."
J. Please remove note 911 altogether. It conflicts with note #10.
K. Please add the following note to the Plant Notes section: "Replacement of landscape elements
needed due to utility development and/or maintenance will be at the developer's expense."
III. - - - ELEVATION COMMENTS ---
A. Please submit final elevation drawings.
B. Please provide a fencing detail as well as a development I.D. sign detail.
IV. - - - COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS ---
A. Engineering:
1. See attached comments.
B. Parks:
l . Park fees will vary according to square footage of buildings, and will be assessed at the time of
building permit issuance.
2. Jerry Brown came across some language that the developers at Southridge put into their sales
contracts. We feel that similar language would be appropriate for this project, and would like to
see it placed in the General Notes of the site plan. The language is as follows:
It is hereby understood that the Greens at Collindale PUD is a
separate entity from Collindale Golf Course and is in no way affiliated
with membership of the golf course, which is presently owned and
operated by the City of Fort Collins. The City hereby expressly
disclaims any present or future liability arising from the above
described property's proximity to said golf course and related golfing
activities, and the homeowner accepts and assumes any and all risks
for future damage or injury that homeowner or their guests on the
above -described property may suffer on account of such proximity.
According to the Title transfer agreement (judgement and decree) that was written up and signed
when the property was sold to Landsource, the City must grant an easement for the sanitary
sewer lines through the golf course property, provided Landsource or their successors "shall pay
for the reasonable cost of such easement, shall construct all improvements and facilities within
such easement according to the design specifications of the City of Fort Collins and shall further
bear all costs of construction of said improvement, as well as all costs of restoration and repair
of any City property damaged by said construction." This agreement will need to be worked out
with Jerry Brown of the Parks and Recreation Department.
C. Zoning:
I . Building envelopes are suggested over footprints on the site plan. This must be corrected.
2. Please place a bike rack on the site plan, perhaps near the perpendicular parking area(s).
3. The setbacks note on Land Use Breakdown should say "minimum unless otherwise noted. This
to address situations such as the fact that it says 14' minimum from east property line, but it shows
an I F setback for Lot 7.
D. Building Inspection:
l . See attached comments.
E. Cablevision:
TCI of Fort Collins would like to see all side easements shown labeled as six (6) foot utility
easements.
F. Light and Power:
See attached comments.
G. Poudre Fire Authority:
1. Two (2) fire hydrants will be required at or near the entrances.
2. The two duplexes labeled GG where the seven buildings are located at the south end of the
project are shown as fire sprinklered but DO meet Fire Department Access requirements and,
thus, would not be required to be fire sprinklered.
3. All access roadways must be an all-weather driving surface capable of supporting fire apparatus.
Surfaces may be asphalt, concrete, or compacted road base. Surface criteria may be obtained
from the City or County Engineering Departments.
4. The private drive must be signed "Fire Lane No Parking." The twenty-eight (28') foot private
drive must be signed to prevent parking on one side.
H. US West:
1. The landscape plan still shows decks extending into the utility easement along the south property
line. This conflict with use for utilities is unacceptable to U S West.
2. U S West requires a utility easement at the southwest corner of Lot 24 for access across the
drainage easement into Lot 24.
I. Police:
1. Please consider building address locations and visibility. Easily readable addresses enhance
emergency response times significantly.
I Mapping and Drafting (plat -related comments):
1. Please show Lemay Avenue dedication - reception number.
2. The plat needs a vicinity map.
3. Please describe: the control monuments.
4. The dedication statement does not call the plat a PUD; this must be done.
5. The document that vacates the r.o.w. in Lot I should be listed on this plat.
6. Please label Tract A as "utility, drainage, and public access easement."
This concludes Staff comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various
departments and reviewing agencies (i.e., Stormwater, Natural Resources, etc.) continue to review this
request. In order to stay on schedule for the October 28, 1996 Planning and Zoning Board hearing,
please note the following deadlines:
***********k*****Y:X************X*****X*******************************************
Plan revisions (folded & not stapled) are due by 12:00 p.m. Wednesday, October 9, 1996.
P.M.T.'s, 10 prints, and colored renderings are due Monday, October 21, 1996.
***No revisions or supporting documents will be accepted after revision date (10/9/96).***
NO REVISIONS WILL BE REVIEWED AFTER THE ABOVE DEADLINE. IF REVISIONS ARE
NOT RECEIVED BY THIS DATE, THE ITEM WILL EITHER GO TO THE PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD WITH A STAFF RECOMMENDATION BASED ON THE ORIGINALLY
SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS OR THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE THE OPTION OF CONTINUING
THE ITEM TO THE NEXT MONTH'S BOARD AGENDA.
If you should have any questions regarding these comments or if I could be of further assistance to you
in any way, please do not hesitate to contact me at 221-6641.
Sincerely,
A Jb-
JMitchell Haas
Project Planner
encl.
GREENS AT COLLINDALE P.U.D.
Engineering Department Comments
October 31. 1996
* Many of the comments listed below are repeat comments from the last submittal.
Please address all comments - as they pertain to this site - before resubmitting
plans for another round of review. The plans are not ready for submittal of
mylars.
1/12 Title Sheet
• All references to public streets on the plans, the plat, and related documents
should be removed unless applicable to Lemay Avenue since there are no other
public streets within or adjacent to this project. Eliminate the word street from
General Note #1. Also, review all other notes and references on the plans to
make sure they pertain and are correct for this site.
• When final mylars are requested for City approval, be sure to update the date on
the front of the plans to the month and year of mylar submittal.
• Label features on the vicinity map that help locate the project. The purpose of
the map is for inspectors, contractors, future reference, etc. to be able to locate
the site and identify its boundaries. Therefore, the vicinity map should show
enough detail and be adequately labeled to serve this purpose.
2/12 Plat
• As noted previously, make sure the dedication statement reads appropriately for
the project. "Boilerplate" language must often be modified to fit each particular
project. Remove the dedication of streets since there is no public street r.o.w.
being dedicated to the City since Lemay Avenue r.o.w. is existing and the
internal drives are private.
• Show the limits of the dimension for Lemay Avenue.
• Make sure the curb return areas designed match the intersection of the
driveways and Lemay Avenue - i.e. do the returns encroach on the adjacent
tracts and/or lots ?
• The "hammerhead" turnarounds must be part of the driveway tract - not the
open space, detention pond, or lots.
• Change the plat notes as shown
3/12 Overall Grading Plan
• Make sure site, landscape, and utility plan sheets match - for example, the
median is riot shown on this sheet.
• As noted previously - all private driveways are required to be constructed in
concrete to the property line. Also add appropriate construction notes for
surfacing and/ or reference driveway detail.
• Make sure cross slope across driveway cross -pans is the minimum required
0.60%
• It is not clear whether the ramps at the driveways are existing or not. If they are
new, please show them per the current City standard. If you have not received
the new standards for pedestrian ramps please stop by the Engineering
Department, pick up a copy, and show the appropriate detail(s) on the plans.
• As noted last time, please add adequate construction notes to identify the limits
of all proposed work - removals, reconstruction, patching, etc. For example, how
much of the existing sidewalk around the driveway being removed is necessary
to remove and replace to provide logical limits to the removal ? The limits are
not defined.
• Provide a means of defining where the common driveway ends and the driveway
to lots 1 and 2 begins. Otherwise, people are likely to use the driveway for the
units as the turnaround instead of the hammerhead. Suggest constructing
driveway to units 1 and 2 out of concrete.
• As noted previously, somewhere in the plan set you must provide driveway
details for the actual driveways being constructed - see following comments.
4/12 Overall Utility Plan
• As noted last time - show the limits of patching anticipated for all utility cuts and
work in and along Lemay Avenue. Also note that patch limits are subject to
change based on field inspection by City's inspectors.
5/12 Overall Service Plan
• No comments
6/12 Demolition Plan
• As noted last time, cross-reference the demolition work with those plan sheets
that detail the limits of removal, reconstruction, patching, etc. and the details of
what is to be reconstructed.
• As noted previously, provide driveway details. It is not sufficient to try to use the
City's standard details for street intersections as driveway details. Private
driveways must be designed and detailed to show radii, width, material
specification, spot elevations, ramp details, etc. (Even for public street
intersections the City's details are only for general reference - each intersection
must be designed for each project).
7/12 Private Drive Plan and Profile
• As noted last time - many of the spot elevations are not readable and therefore
are not useable design information, provide driveway details that meet City
criteria (0.60% cross slope on pans, concrete to property line, 2.00% slope from
flowline of roadway 50' back onto the site, standard ramps, etc.).
• Show how the driveways tie into the existing cross -slopes in Lemay Avenue.
8 through 12/12
• No comments
12/12A
• Use only details which are current and applicable to this project.
• Obtain current details for ramps in the public r.o.w.
• What are the specifications and design for the trickle pan in the private
driveways?
• Where do the City's curb and gutter details apply ? Are they being used on -site
or is the private curb and gutter being constructed to a different standard ?
Specify which details are used where.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Plannint
DATE: July 14, 1997 DEPT:f� Gl f w=e
PROJECT: The Greens at Collindale PUD
Engineer: Sheri Wamhoff
An administrative change has been proposed for this project to modify the driveway
widths and/ or locations within The Greens at Collindale PUD. I have reviewed this
change and have:
fsNo Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Date: 1,5 "9 7 Signature:��
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Plannint
DATE: Ju131 14, 1997 DEPT: A9PXWf
PROJECT: The Greens at Collindale PUD
Engineer: Sheri Wamhoff
An administrative change has been proposed for this project to modify the driveway
widths and/ or locations within The Greens at Collindale PUD. I have reviewed this
change and have:
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Dater i. �97 Signature/—�
T_,
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: July 14, 1997 DEPT:
PROJECT: The Greens at Collindale PUD
Engineer: Sheri Wamhoff
An administrative change has been proposed for this project to modify the driveway
widths andi or locations within The Greens at Collindale PUD. I have reviewed this
change and have:
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Date: Signature:
Soils Report:
• Identifies moderately to highly expansive clay soils on the site. Drilling was done
in the winter so groundwater levels are at 14 feet.
Plat:
• Common driveway area must be called out as a tract on the final plat and
dedicated as a drainage, utility, and public access easement. The tract (private
drive) will not be maintained by the City.
Site Plan:
• In general, the site is very crowded. Utility easements and installation will be a
problem as is fire access. The driveway access to several units is tight and
creates points of conflict. All private streets must be a minimum of 20 feet wide,
exclusive of parking, or wider if required by the Poudre Fire Authority.
• No parking stalls at the driveway entrances are allowed within 100 feet of the
Lemay Avenue flowline.
• The units along the golf course have no setback from and appear to encroach
into the proposed swale.
• The project masonry wall, including the footings, must be entirely outside of the
public r.o.w.
• Clarify whether or not the sidewalk on Lemay is existing.
• Need more detail on proposed radii, widths of driveway and parking stalls.
• The private drives must be concrete from the public r.o.w. to the property line
Utility/Grading Plans:
• Same comments as noted for drainage report and site plan
• Final plans need to show details of driveways to be constructed and removal of
the existing drive.
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: July 14, 1997 DEPT:
PROJECT: The Greens at Collindale PUD
Engineer: Sheri Wamhoff
Date:
An administrative change has been proposed for this project to modify the driveway
widths and/ or locations within The Greens at Collindale PUD. I have reviewed this
change and have:
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Signature:
City of Fort Collins
Current Plannint
DATE: �//,/ /, 8-
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT:
PLANNER:
ENGINEER:
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Greens at Collindale April 1, 1998
• A back up area has been eliminated in the southwestern corner of the site. This can not
be eliminated as it does not appear that the owner of lot 24 will be able to get out of the
driveway easily.
• on sheet 6 make sure all the markings necessary for the parking stalls are shown on the
plans.
Date: Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ AT
❑ ITE
❑ UTILITY
❑ LANDSCAPE
of Fort Collins
Plannina
PROJECT `
COMMENTSHEET
r
DATE: M4`( 'O �qeA (o DEPARTMENT: j ' 1(,i
PROJECT:
PLANNER: M ITG IDS
All comments must be received by: JUNe J+
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below)
Date Signature:
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT
COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580
PLANNING DEPARTMENT (303)221-6750
City of Fort Collins
Plannina
PROJECT
COMMENTSHEET
DATE: MAA`( 30
PROJECT: 61�
PLANNER: M 1-rG�i
«eA(U DEPARTMENT: ! O
A1- GDLLI t`1DALE — i'�LI�`
All comments must be received by: JUoiE J+
No Problems
EffProblems or Concerns (see below)
Se e"` 5 a.s pr7ases� A►a.re..� /NoT aJsLv�.�'i
tl��►.e- /�...�. o� C�E�`vs.�w%w.�-o- S;/a�ua.lk5 jo+s
7 Lor LSD.
;) VF
areas
-- �«.G�'�-'r ✓�i//7Y loocr���a��� N��7�i � r.aRO✓� ,
Date: 0& 9'(o Signature• •� S/
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLA
COPIES OF REVISIONS: SITE
LANDSCAPE
UTILITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580
PLANNING DEPARTMENT (303)221-6750
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: August 27, 1996 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: ;#8-96A The Greens at Collinsdale PUD - Final
PLANNER: Mitch Haas
All comments must be received by: September 6, 1996
THE GREENS AT COLLINDALE P.U.D. - Final
1st Submittal
Engineering Department Review Comments
September 6, 1996
Traffic Engineering Comments (Eric Bracke)
• Plans need to show the existing medians and landscaping in Lemay Avenue -
there are potential sight distance problems which need to be evaluated with this
project due to the access points.
Parks and Recreation (Randy Balok)
• Need proof of the existence of an easement on the south side of the golf course.
If there is not an existing easement the applicant needs to coordinate with Jerry
Brown the Golf Course Manager in Parks to obtain an easement. Generally, City
Council action is required to grant easements on City property.
Date: Signature
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE
COPIES OF REVISIONS
PLAT
SITE
LANDSCAPE
UTILITY
Site Plan
• Eliminate "Private Roadway" label from plan and replace with "PRIVATE DRIVE"
• Many of the site plan notes are inappropriate for a final plan. Please eliminate
and/or revise as noted. In particular, the site is so constricted that there cannot
be variances in the building footprint without City and utility review and approval -
any shifts in building envelope will affect landscaping, grading, utilities, etc.
• Note 3 needs to specify that the H.O.A. is obligated for maintenance of the
Private Drive. Also, eliminate "or other appropriate maintenance vehicle" -
nobody knows what that means
• The entire median in the south driveway entrance must be outside of the public
r.o.w. (Including curb and gutter)
• Indicate whether public sidewalk and access ramps are existing or are being
constructed with this project
Landscape Plan
• See comments from Traffic Engineering
UTILITY PLANS
* In general, at this point, the plans lack sufficient detail to be able to use them to
build the project.
Sheet 1/12 Title Sheet :
• Remove "Construction Plans" from title and replace with "UTILITY PLANS" since
this is how the City Code and Development Agreement refer to them. (This has
been a standard requirement for several years)
• Change the name of the street plan sheet to Private Drive Plan and Profile. The
City wants no mistake that this is a private drive not a street of any kind
Sheet 2/12 Plat:
• Label Tract A as PRIVATE DRIVE, again, so it is clearly not a street of any kind
• Label the r.o.w. to be vacated as "40' r.o.w. vacated by Ordinance No. of
the Fort Collins City Council" . The r.o.w. will have to be vacated after final P & Z
approval and prior to recording the plat.
• Label everything that is not a lot as a Tract - not just Open Space - tracts are
assigned parcel numbers, "open space" is not something well defined for the
Assessor's purposes. In addition, provide a note to define the purpose,
ownership, and maintenance of all Tracts.
• Since there are no public streets or r.o.w. dedication with this project, eliminate
the portion of the dedication statement referencing public streets/r.o.w.
Sheet 3/12 Overall Grading Plan
• Add detail to the plan to show limits of construction in the public r.o.w. and add
construction notes to explain what is being done with this project, what is
existing, what is being removed and replaced, etc.
• Show the existing topo lines adjacent to the site to show how your proposed
contours are tying to existing at the property lines - nothing is shown to the
south.
• A construction fence will be required along the project boundary to help ensure
there is no off -site grading outside the property boundary or easements obtained
for grading/construction
• The scale of the plan makes it difficult to tell how existing/proposed contours tie
in and how lot grading works
Sheet 4/12 Overaill Utility Plan
• Same comments as previous sheet with respect to work in the public r.o.w.
• Show limits of patching/overlay in Lemay Avenue - patching of arterial streets
has stricter requirements than local street patching. Contact Engineering
Pavement Management Division for requirements.
Sheet 5/12 Overall Service Plan
• See W & S comments
Sheet 6/12 Demolition Plan
• For our purposes, this plan is not necessary - instead, the removals, etc. in the
r.o.w. should be shown and detailed on the overall utility and grading plans
Sheet 7/12 PRIVATE DRIVE PLAN AND PROFILE
• Label as Private Drive plan and profile
• * While the centerline profiles are somewhat useful, need to add typical cross-
section(s) (with and without parking for example), horizontal control, dimensions,
etc. to be able to build the curb and gutter for the project. Suggest adding a
detailed plan including horizontal control and spot elevations. Otherwise, there is
no way to tell where the curb and gutter goes horizontally and vertically. There is
no room for error and/or field "construct -to -fit" approach on this project due to
tight fit for all utilities, grading, etc. *
• Need detains of both driveway entrances - City details on detail sheet are not for
private driveways - design your own detail pertinent to this project. Include radii,
spot elevations, concrete construction to property line (specify type and
thickness), etc.
• Site and landscape plans show a median in the south entrance. If there is to be
a median, provide a design for it and make sure it is entirely outside the public
r.o.w.
• 20' is the maximum allowable radius for the driveways
• Design the "hammerheads" to provide the most useable turn -around space
available - don't just design to minimum standards, design to what fits the site
and is most useable for the purpose
Sheets 8/12, 9/12, 10/12 - See comments from W&S, Stormwater
Sheet 11/12 Final Drainage and Erosion Control Plan
• The plan is generally illegible and therefore of no use in reviewing or constructing
the project
Sheets 12/12 and 12A/12 Detail Sheets ( should be sheet 13 not "12A" )
• Many of the! details do not apply to this project since there are no public streets
being constructed. Projects with private drives need to provide details specific
to the site and what is actually being constructed.
• As noted previously provide driveway details and appropriate ramp details. Use
City's current ramp details - copies are available in the Engineering Department
Commr y Planning and Environmental .vices
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
September 20, 1996
Mr. Bob Sutter
Architectural Horizons
P.O. Box 271217
Fort Collins, CO 80527-1217
Dear Bob,
Staff has reviewed your submittal for the Greens at Collindale P.U.D., Final (48-96A) and offers the
following comments:
I. - - - SITE PLAN COMMENTS - - -
A. Plan Comments:
Please make sure that no easements are encroached upon (anywhere on the plans), and that no
portion of any structure extends beyond its designated building envelope. A few entry areas and
decks appear to be encroaching upon easements, for instance,
The patio/deck on the south side of the building on Lot 27 is encroaching upon the
landscape easement,
The courtyard/entry area on the west side of the building on Lot 24 encroaches upon a
utility and drainage easement,
The entryways/courtyards on the front sides of the building on Lots 9 and 10 appear to
be encroaching upon the front lot utility and drainage easement,
The deck on the east side of the building on Lot 17 appears to be encroaching upon the
utility and drainage easement, and extending beyond the designated building envelope,
Other areas that appear to be encroaching upon easements include the northwestern
corner of the building on Lot 25; both entryway courtyards on the building on Lots 25
and 26, and, the entryway courtyards of the buildings on Lots 14, and 18-23.
2. Fort Collins Light and Power does not install streetlights on private streets. Please revise general
note #8 accordingly. Also, to the extent possible, please indicate the proposed locations of all
privately installed street lights.
281 North College Avenue • P0. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750
FAX (970) 221-6378 • TDD (970) 224-6002