HomeMy WebLinkAboutED CARROLL MOTOR COMPANY LOT EXPANSION PDP - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-07-23Dater/ Time: 130
Location: 90610 Hn rmo Dr.
Description:'roa/1^^
Gj Applicant: 'o n a T)a S I ?- I-
o l o w,.➢ Q'inn n l �,` 1 I_4 �n �i-,.- ,� i ,w+'
— %ro�ro,C-cr,Q,wt 5
maM VvxA _r_ did
W i IMP Q +f) Tv am,
Date: Time: o/ "
Location: 3 S OcoK,2V,,
-- -- - - Description:_Zaaarroa Mp-kars
Lcf(-D(o'�-exVarn51o✓l N QQmtin
Mil l0_1_(al^j
Applicant:6iod_ -)e
.Gl_ 6tmt s:;OS_
contI6 &Y(C,66-cam & 0
—Mai vutA add c+wyt Q -tzovJ lW `CCTU Lo_L.Gr,(�1SS _ c--g ---
- will nuA �-o _-SeR -var wkc,(. T \L�� tkbrAI*C1 b c- i e
al- ��i l l G` -GwY Y1 G�� s`t r �i � Cix..v 1 MUL LA)
✓q J V
5 16tvu Ak ako-,q�. Uk W" axdc
24 Show the Utility and Access Easements.
25 Provide the variance to the driveway separation requirements in line 48 of the
General Notes.
z6 Provide the d"ainage flow arrows as noted in the Legend.
27 Add the note that all accessidriveway approaches are paved with Portland cement
from the street to the ROW on the utility sheet.
28 Remove the '10' dimension from the asphalt cut. See redlines.
✓29 The landscape plans show a gate in several places - please show the gate on the
utility plan as well.
43-' All offsite improvements require an easement. All offsite grading requires a
temporary construction easement. W e, eA t ed fLe eua l,c w •1 +� a p�e�f°� ev
,fOwG AJ»Id- 4 he.ed d"A 6m)'P~f
bit— Show how the proposed sidewalk ties into the existing on the NW corner. Add a
note that the proposed sidewalk will match existing or tie into existing sidewalk -
somethinq worded to that effect. lot-'rl' fL' exir-PI h9 toe#e� o» �� c
Pt4». -T/,ey +te. +07e+X'e
/32 Dimension the parking stall width and length, typical.
�33 Label the interior medians as "outfall" curb and gutter, see redlines.
34/ See redlines for other comments.
35 Contact Bob Zal�ely at 224-6063 for drainage and erosion control notes. Wa 41-1 -Fo he -,bask fva.+. ob.
M8 Possibly missing a contour line, see redlines, NW corner. Sarlw�e �ew ake
Talks y ql,e»+ 33. conto».. ?he a s-,c l6e,e. y .k if f) eG
3Y Please make: sure that the detail sheet mylar is of reproducible quality - some of
these lines are indistinct. w t. P"1 t,'.,, Cn drll pe 4-r
38" Provide the following details, LCUASS 7-20a, 16-1, 16-2, 16-4d, 7-29a, 7-29b and
any detail as required by the design. We P»++Ae,% •^ 04,1- `^/f/' Oey J'4o eUae,de?e
✓44 The site/landscape plan show an existing light pole in the new driveway, NW corner.
Please show and label as being removed or relocated.
4< Are you meeting the minimum desirable flowline grade around the curb returns of
1%? Tkty
48 Provide stationing at all PCs and driveway intersections.
Page 3
ED CARROLL MOTORS
Transportation Coordination Meeting
4/18/02
The applicant 'has the following questions regarding the additional ROW
regUlrcments for McClelland:
I,
�dCT I'Y,:f .' �' .. _. � .�•`..t4 ,'� � �s;',✓..,- y.� v:'. 4'f-`'i ..-. �'v"''k'_. ^%� oc�� .- i:K':i. i L�. �—�'..i -
a14
1. How much ROW do we really need?i� 2> ��-
i 10 0F,
2. Why do they need both bike lanes on McClelland if the City is putting
the major bike/ped walkway west of the railroad tracks?
3. Are there any plans to pipe the ditch by the City? The hope is that the
additional ROW could be obtained from the west side. If not, do we
know if the ditch owners be willing to allow the ditch to be piped at the
developer's expense?
2 cti IS
4. If the developer dedicates the additional ROW at this time, would the
City accept an interim condition that would allow him full use of the
ROW until such time the road improvements actually go in?
-1"
5. When does the City expect these improvements to actually occur?
0 yEonz S
August 19, 2002
Mr. Troy Jones
City of Fort Collins Planning Department
281 North College Ave.
Fort Collins, Colorado 90525
RE: Project No.: Ed Carroll Motors
Dear Troy:
Lmro- � .nr.. L:lOaraw e�..,....,a
The attached prints of Ed Carroll Motors -Lot Expansion IL Project Development Plan, Site and
Landscape Plan, reflect revisions made in accordance with the comments in your letter of March
25, 2002. Our specific response to each comment is noted below, using numbering shown on
your letter. Please refer to engineer's responses for specific comments.
Planning Comments
Alternative compliance
76-82 The lighting plan has been modified to comply with the Land Use Code Sections
3.2.4. This was achieved by eliminating the number of fixtures on certain poles within the
site.
83. The plan as resubmitted is in compliance with the Land Use Code.
General
84. Noted.
85. Noted.
Lighting Plan
80. We have submitted two lighting plans, one showing the illumination 20' off the
property line, and the other showing the average just within the property line.
The lines have been darkened for clarity.
The correct site plan has been submitted for the lighting plan.
The plan has been modified to comply with the Land Use Code.
Site/Landscape
71. The site and Landscape plans have been separated into two individual drawings.
72. The site plan has been cleaned up for clarity.
73. The tree shown on the plan as being located in the drive aisle, is being transplanted to
another location on -site (see Landscape Plan)
74. The plans are now coordinated, and identify the same information.
75. Noted.
Engineering
General
45. The site and Landscape plans are now, two separate plans.
EAPRWEC FIESWWD�151\D S\RMBMI726A2.DOC
JMI Sp 0681G(S INC ;:;,j t53WRrEMUYRAW^,TNE ,FMC0WNSC0L0RA00805Z4 970494.1921 FAr 970484.2443 JIMSELLOESIEN.
Name
Date
Pa<>e 2
46. Noted_
49. Cam McNair and the Engineering staff are currently researching the impact of the
Special [mprovements District that originally funded the construction of McClelland.
50. The plan has been modified, and the gate in now within the next aisle to the east.
Site/Landscape
39. The walks have been dimensioned.
40. All easements, property lines, ROW and utilities have been shown.
41. Spot elevations have been taken off the site plan.
42. Existing features have been shown on the plan, as a screened line.
43. Noted, and changed.
Light & Power
Landscaping
55. Noted.
Transportation Planning
Site/Landscape
63. The site and Landscape Plans are now separated into two sheets.
64. The McClelland ROW has been shown on the plan
65. Cam McNair and the Engineering staff are currently researching the impact of the
Special Improvements District that originally funded the construction of McClelland.
Zoning
General
Noted.
Please contact our office, should you have any questions regarding this resubmittal.
Sincerely,
Jim Sell Design, Inc.
Senior Landscape Architect/Project Manager
cc: File
@NROILCI�HLFSV.ANM 151UXSVt SUBMI r'GOlCC(:
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
�a
JIM SELL DESIGN, INC. Date: 8/23/02
C/O BRAD SAUCERMAN
153 WEST MOUNTAIN AVE
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
Staff has reviewed your submittal for ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION PDP, and
we offer the followincl comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones
Topic: Alternative Compliance
76
Your application request for alternative compliance for "parking lot lighting," is not
clear specifically for what section of the LUC you are requesting the alternative
compliance. Please specify.
77
a. Sections 3.2.4(E)(1) & (2) of the LUC specify in order to approve an alternative
compliance to the lighting standards that the decision maker must find how the proposed
plan satisfies the purpose of the Section equally well or better than a plan that satisfies
the standard. The purpose of the Section is stated in Section 3.2.4(A) of the LUC where
it states:
"The intent of this Section is to focus on the actual physical effects of lighting, as well as the
effect that lighting may have on the surrounding neighborhood. Exterior lighting shall be
evaluated in the development review process to ensure that the functional and security needs
of the project are met in a way that does not adversely affect the adjacent properties or
neighborhood. The degree to which exterior night lighting affects a property owner or
neighborhood will be examined considering the light source, level of illumination, hours of
illumination and need for illumination in relation to the effects of the lighting on adjacent
property owners and the neighborhood."
/t is not clear,front the justification letter how the alternative compliance request satisfies this purpose
equaltp well or hetter than a plan that satisfies the standard.
78
The key issues to flush out within that stated purpose statement, as I see them, are:
(1) what is the best level of lighting to satisfy the needs of the project, and (2) how do
we ensure that that the project's lighting does not adversely affect the adjacent
properties or neighborhood?
79
Issue - Best level of lighting. The information that I downloaded from the internet at
www.darksky.org/icla/infoshts/is077.html claims that the Illuminating Engineering
Society of North America (IES) recommends between 5 and 10 foot-candles for the
circulation areas, and between 20 and 50 foot-candles for the merchandise areas of
auto sales lots. The third paragraph of the January 22nd alternative compliance letter
from you claims that the IES recommends 100 to 300 foot candles for this use. As far
as I can tell you are mistaken. In a lighting handbook (published by Philips Lighting),
that the Current Planning Department has, it recommends 300 LUX or 30 foot-candles
Page 1
for the pump island area of a service station. Perhaps your alternative compliance
letter mistakenly used the LUX number for the foot-candle value. Please look into this
and revise the alternative compliance request letter accordingly.
81
From a public safety standpoint, we are concerned about the site having a blinding
affect on drivers as a result of their pupils adjusting to the brightness as they pass,
thereby making it dlifficult to see in the immediately adjacent darker portions of the
street. This is one of the reasons we will only support an alternative compliance for
an average maintained lighting level within the red dashed line area of 20 foot-candles
or less.
82
From a neighborhood compatibility standpoint, there needs to be some efforts to
mitigate the light spillage into the back yards and windows of neighboring houses to
the west. The neighborhood meeting identified that there is an ambient glow coming
from the existing lot. Some of the neighbors explained that their entire back yards
are illuminated from this ambient light. The alternative compliance request must
propose a solution to address the adverse impacts created by these ambient lighting
conditions. Two potential solutions that come to mind might be: (1) to construct a 6
foot privacy fence along the east property line of any of the houses that have back
yards in direct view of the site, or (2) to plant evergreen trees in the backyards of any
of the affected properties. These solutions would of course need to be coordinated
with the adjacent property owners. There may be many possible solutions for solving
the adverse impacts of the ambient lighting on the neighborhood, these are only a
few suggestions. It's up to the applicant to provide a justification of how this issue is
addressed in order to gain staff support of the alternative compliance.
83
Another factor that affects the neighbors is that there are several lights on the
existing Ed Carroll lot that have bulbs directly visible from the windows of the
neighboring houses. There is one light fixture about midway between McClelland and
College that points diagionally northwest, and the bulb is visible by these houses.
There are several existing light fixtures located at the College Avenue frontage road
that are very bright and shine west. Even thought these lights are quite a ways away
from the houses, they are bright enough and shining a direction that really does
impact the neighbors. One option that would greatly increase the chances of a
successful alternative compliance request would be make part of your alternative
compliance request: the offer to change out these problematic light fixtures with
down -directional cult -off fixtures. This would greatly improve your ability to
successfully justify the statement that the proposed plan satisfies the purpose of the
standard equally well or better than a plan meeting the standard.
Topic: General
84
A certificate of taxes due (available from the Larimer County Treasurer's office)
showing a balance of zero must be submitted to the Current Planning Department
prior to the recordation of the Plat.
85
Page 2
Revisions based on these comments must be submitted to the Current Planning
Department within 90 days of the date of this letter or the project becomes null and
void. A 30 day extension is available, but must be requested.
Topic: lighting plan
80
a. There is a lighting diagram that was submitted titled "LitePro 1.02 Paint -By -Point
Results." The folllowing comments are regarding this diagram:
• There is a statistical chart showing the minimum point lighting level to be 0.01,
the maximum point lighting level to be 54.2, and the average to be 9.09. While
the average of 9.09 foot-candles sounds pretty good, it is including areas in the
average up to 100 feet away from the site. See the redlined plan. Please figure
the average lighting levels in a tighter area around the site as shown in the red
dashed line on the reclined plan.
• Darken the lines of the drawing (under the grid of numbers) for added legibility.
• Revise the lines of the drawing (under the grid of numbers) to reflect the same
layout as the site and landscape drawings. The southeast corner of the site
differs.
• The redlined lighting plans shows all areas exceeding 20 foot-candles highlighted
in yellow with an orange outline. As proposed, over half of the site exceeds a
spot value of 20 foot-candles.
• As far as lighting levels go, City Staff can only support an alternative compliance
request if the average maintained lighting levels within the area depicted by the
red -dashed line (on the redlined point -by -point diagram) does not exceed 20 foot-
candles.
In our review of the lighting plan, we acknowledge that brand new bulbs are slightly brighter than the
average level of brightness maintained for the fixtures over the useable life of the fixtures. The revised
plan can use the average maintained lighting levels of the lighting fixtures rather than the lighting levels
produced by the fixture immediately after installation.
Topic: Site/Landscape
71
The site plan and the landscape plan need to be 2 separate sheets as required in the
submittal requirements of PDPs.
72
There are too many confusing lines on the drawing along McClelland. It is very hard
to make out where the sidewalk is. If the existing curb cut is to be removed, don't
show any reference to it on the proposed plans. Adjust the line weights so the
drawing is less confusing. Why are there so many lines crossing the new proposed
curb cut? What do they mean?
73
Remove the tree shown in the middle of the drive aisle at the new curb cut location.
74
The internal parking lot layout differs between the lighting plan and the site/landscape
plan in the configuration of curbs in the southeast corner of the site and along the
east side of the site. It appears the light pole locations along the east side of the site
differ between plans.
Page 3
75
Canopy street trees must be 40 feet from street lights, but ornamental street trees can
be as close as 15 feet from street lights. See L&P comment #2.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
45
Please split out the Site and Landscape plans into separate sheets for clarity.
46
No monument signs allowed in the ROW.
49
Provide a detached sidewalk, additional ROW and 15' utility easements along McClelland. Exact ROW requirements
are to be determined in a meeting this Friday. Contact myself at 221-6605 or Tom Reif in Transportation Planning 416-
2040.
50
The gated entrance on the northwest side is too close to McClelland and presents a conflict. Drivers exiting from this
drive aisle may not see northbound drivers on McClelland making an east bound right. Suggest either closing this
entrance completely if not needed or moving it over to the east one drive aisle.
Topic: Pavement
5
From Rick Richter, Pavement Management: No comment.
Topic: Plat
6
Make corrections to the Statement of Ownership and Notice of Other Documents - see redlines.
7
Provide statements of the dedication of any easements, ROW, tracts, and other public areas. Provide a note
referencing fact that previous easements are being vacated.
8
Provide 2 ties to section corners.
9
Clearly define all existing and proposed easements and ROW
19
Provide the date under the legal description.
20
The 24' access easement is not labeled correctly - it is not a consistent 24' across for the entire length of the drive
Please label as "Public Access Easement".
21
Provide the Notice box for Private Drives. See attached.
Topic: Site/Landscape
39
Dimension the sidewalk widths.
Page 4
40
Show, dimension all easements, property lines, ROW, and utilities.
41
Remove the spot elevations and contours for clarity.
42
Existing features adjacent to or within the development need to be shown in a ghosted or alternate line weight.
43
See redlines for spelling error in the crosswalk label and correction to the Property Description, Attorney's Certificate
and the Planning & Zoning Approval certificate. See attached.
Topic: Utility
10
Complete and submit the checklist, Appendix E-4.
11
Cover Sheet: Provide legal description below the project name and take out the word "subdivision" from the title.
12
Cover Sheet: The vicinity map must be 10" x 10".
13
Cover Sheet: Renumber the index as shown.
14
Provide the Construction Notes, see appendix E-2. Section A not shown - is it not needed?
15
Provide the soils report as stated in line 19 of the General Notes.
16
Provide the Stewart's fax number in the title block.
17
Provide ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions and labels. Add to legend.
18
Dimension driveway width and location. Radii must be in accordance with Table 8-2 and widths must meet 7-29b
Label all radii. Driveway must also conform to standard drawing 7-30.
22
Provide directional ramps at the driveway in accordance with 16-4d.
23
Add the Utility and Access (Easements to all sheets and show on plan.
24
Show the Utility and Access Easements.
25
Provide the variance to the driveway separation requirements in line 48 of the General Notes.
`z
Page 5
Provide the drainage flow arrows as noted in the Legend
27
Add the note that all access/driveway approaches are paved with Portland cement from the street to the ROW on the
utility sheet.
28
Remove the 10' dimension from the asphalt cut. See redlines.
29
The landscape plans show a gate in several places - please show the gate on the utility plan as well.
30
All offsite improvements require an easement. All offsite grading requires a temporary construction easement.
31
Show how the proposed sidewalk ties into the existing on the NW corner. Add a note that the proposed sidewalk will
match existing or tie into existing sidewalk - something worded to that effect.
32
Dimension the parking stall width and length, typical.
33
Label the interior medians as "outfall" curb and gutter, see redlines
34
See redlines for other comments.
35
Contact Bob Zakely at 224-6063 for drainage and erosion control notes
36
Possibly missing a contour line, see redlines, NW corner.
37
Please make sure that the detail sheet mylar is of reproducible quality - some of these lines are indistinct.
38
Provide the following details, LCUASS 7-20a, 16-1, 16-2, 16-4d, 7-29a, 7-29b and any detail as required by the design
44
The site/landscape plan show an existing light pole in the new driveway, NW corner. Please show and label as being
removed or relocated.
47
Are you meeting the minimum desirable flowline grade around the curb returns of 1 %?
48
Provide stationing at all PCs and driveway intersections.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: General
54
Electric Development Charges will apply at the time of development as a condition of continued electric service to Ed
Carroll Motors. These charges are estimated to be $8000.00.
Page 6
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planninia
DATE: February 11, 2002 TO: Engineering Pavement
PROJECT: #5-98A Ed Carroll Motors Lot Expansion PDP - Type I
(LUC)
All comments, must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
March 13, 2002
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Pta (/-"" 0d—
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other AIN
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape ctty oEF °�:
Topic: landscaping
55
The street tree shown on McClelland near the south portion of the site must be relocated to be a minimum of 40 ft. from
the streetlight.
Department: Natural Resources
Topic: General
4
No issues at this time.
Department: PFA
Topic: General
2
After reviewing plans PFA has no comments.
Department: Police
Topic: General
3
No comments.
Department: Stormwater Utility
Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Issue Contact: Michael Chavez
Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Drainage
56
Please provide drainage easements for the detention pond and storm sewer. An offsite drainage easement and
temporary construction easement is needed for the part of the storm sewer on the property to the north.
57
Please provide enough volume in the detention pond to account for the 40-hour extended detention in addition to the
quantity detention.
58
Currently there is no freeboard for the detention pond. Please provide as much freeboard as possible for the pond
Speed bumps or raised sidewalks on the eastern drives may be an option.
59
Please provide TOW and BOW elevations for the concrete retaining wall on the east side of the detention pond.
60
Please provide the finish floor elevation for the building east of the site and show that the building would not be
inundated in a spill situation from the pond.
61
Please investigate the possibility of using the standard water quality outlet structure for the pond. The western
detention pond wall may be used as part of the structure.
Topic: Erosion Control
62
1. There are no erosion control notes/schedule on the plan.
2. The BMP's in the reportdon't show on the plan
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff
Topic: General
51
Page 7
Please provide two separate sheets for the site and landscape plans.
52
Clearly label and identify existing ROW widths along McClelland.
53
Sidewalk along McClelland should be detached on the proposed parcel for development and transition into the existing
attached sidewalk to the south.
Topic: Site/Landscape
63
Please provide two separate sheets for the site and landscape plans.
64
Clearly label and identify existing ROW widths along McClelland.
65
Sidewalk along McClelland should be detached on the proposed parcel for development and transition into the existing
attached sidewalk to the south.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: landscaping
66
Show all water and sewer lines on the landscape plans and provide the required landscape/utility separation distances.
Topic: Plat
67
Provide a 20 foot utility easement for the existing water main and a 30 foot utility for any existing sanitary sewer main.
Topic: Utility
68
A water manhole is shown and labeled near the center of this site. Clearly define what this is and whether it is to be
used or abandoned
69
Will an irrigation tap be required for this site?
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
70
Provide a profile view of the proposed storm drain. Show the existing water main crossing the storm sewer profile.
Provide an 18-inch vertical separation distance and concrete encase the storm sewer if it is above the water main.
Department: Zoning
Topic: General
Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols
1
Remove reference to landscape phasing in note #11 of landscape notes
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
Page 8
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
City of Fort Collins
Department: Engineering
Date: September 25, 2002
Project: ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION PDP
All comments must be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than
the staff review meeting:
September 189 2002
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
49 3/20/2: Provide a detached sidewalk, additional ROW and 15' utility easements
along McClelland. Exact ROW requirements are to be determined in a meeting this
Friday. Contact myself at 221-6605 or Tom Reif in Transportation Planning 416-
2040.
9/12/2: Research by the city staff has shown that the this particular lot has already
dedicated 50' of ROW in 1978 with the McClelland Special Improvement District.
The additional 28' of ROW required to improve McClelland to a minor arterial will be
purchased by the city at a later date. However, the project will need to continue to
keep those future improvements in mind when designing the site as they have been.
Just a few things that need to be coordinated on the plan sets, however. The plat is
currently showing the 50' ROW but the utility plans are showing only 40'. The
Site/Landscape plans call out 50' but do not scale out as 50'. All plan sets will need
to be coordinated to show the correct ROW, as well as the existing RR and Ditch Co.
ROW and/or easements. The project will still be required to dedicate a 15' utility
easement from the back of walk. The project would need to submit a variance
request to install attached 8' sidewalks to match the existing attached walks and
Engineering would be favorable to granting that request. A Public Access Easement
would need to be dedicated on the plat and shown on the plans sets for the area that
the sidewalk extends past the existing ROW. This project must also provide the
temporary construction easement to do the off -site work on the storm line. Please
don't hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Dat
1FECk; MERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
j Plat \J I Site I Drainage Report Other.
_?G Utility )4, Redline Utility ,__t_ Landscape
Page I
Topic: Plat
6 3/20/2: Make corrections to the Statement of Ownership and Notice of Other
Documents - see redlines.
9/12/2: Repeat comment.
9 3/2012: Clearly define all existing and proposed easements and ROW.
9/12/2: Show and dimension the existing RR and Ditch ROW and/or easement.
Show all off site drainage and utility easements to the north and provide the
reception numbers. Provide a Public Access Easement for the area that the
attached sidewalk extends over the existing ROW. Need to coordinate all the plan
sets to provide the same information.
19 3/20/2: Provide the date under the legal description.
9/12/2: Repeat comment.
20 3/20/2: The 24' access easement is not labeled correctly - it is not a consistent 24'
across for the entire length of the drive. Please label as "Public Access and Utility
Easement".
9/12/2: Repeat comment.
88 9/12/2: Remove the word "subdivision" from the project title.
Topic: Site
87 9/12/2- Remove Note #1 from the Project Notes. This information must be shown
on the Site Plan.
Topic: Site/Landscape
39 3/20/2: Dimension the sidewalk widths.
9/12/2 The utility plans show that the existing sidewalk is 8' -not 6' as shown on the
site and landscape plans. Also, the new sidewalk must be 8' to match existing - not
the 7' shown on the site and landscape plans. The sidewalk ramps at the drive
entrance do not match the utility plans. Need to show on all plan sets how the
proposed sidewalk transitions into the existing sidewalk on McClelland, on the south
side of the project. The comment made on the last round of review regarding the
proposed sidewalk on the NE corner still remains - what is this tying into?
40 3/20/2: Show, dimension all easements, property lines, ROW, and utilities.
9/12/2: The 50' ROW shown does not scale out to 50'. The 10' utility easement
shown must be 15' from the back of walk as stated in comment 49 from the last
round of review.
43 3/20/2: See redlines for spelling error in the crosswalk label and correction to the
Property Description, Attorney's Certificate and the Planning & Zoning Approval
certificate. See attached.
Page 2
9/12/2: Repeat.
86 9/12/2: Rernove the 24' dimension from the access drive and call it a "Public Access
and Utility Easement".
Topic: Utility
12 3/20/2: Cover Sheet: The vicinity map must be 10" x 10".
9/12/2: Repeat comment.
14 3/20/2: Provide the Construction Notes, see appendix E-2. Section A not shown - is
it not needed?
9/12/2: The notes shown are incomplete. Please email me at sjoy@fcgov.com and I
will email you back the complete set of notes.
17 3/20/2: Provide ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions and labels.
Add to legend.
9/12/2: Coordinate the ROW shown with the plat and show/dimension the existing
RR and Ditch Co ROW and/or easements. Provide the off -site temporary
construction easement to tie into the existing storm drain on the NE corner of the
project.
18 3/20/2: Dimension driveway width and location. Radii must be in accordance with
Table 8-2 and widths must meet 7-29b. Label all radii. Driveway must also conform
to standard drawing 7-30.
9/1212: Repeat comment. Radii must be 20' versus the 25' shown - See table 8-2.
Is there a particular reason you want the 25' radius
23 3/20/2: Add the Utility and Access Easements to all sheets and show on plan.
9/12/2: Remove the 24' dimension from the Public Access Easement.
25 3/20/2: Provide the variance to the driveway separation requirements in line 48 of
the General Notes.
9/12/2: Submit a variance request for the attached versus detached 8' sidewalk
along McClelland and add to line 48 after its approved.
30 3/20/2: All offsite improvements require an easement. All offsite grading requires a
temporary construction easement.
9/12/2: Provide a temporary construction easement for tieing into the stormline that's
in the adjacent property owner's lot.
34 3/20/2: See redlines for other comments.
35 3/20/2: Contact Bob Zakely at 224-6063 for drainage and erosion control notes.
Page 3
38 3/20/2: Provide the following details, LCUASS 7-20a, 16-1, 16-2, 16-4d, 7-29a, 7-
29b and any detail as required by the design.
9/12/2: Please provide detail 16-4d.
48 3/20/2: Provide centerline stationing at all PCs and driveway intersections.
9/12/2: Repeat comment.
89 9/12/2: "Carroll" incorrectly spelled in the project title of the cover sheet.
90 9/12/2: Correct line 19 of the General Notes, remove the word "subdivision".
91 9/12/2: Sheet 2 of 4 - identify the transition or taper from VC to outfall C&G.
92 9/12/2: Section 9.4.2 requires that all driveways be perpendicular to the road for a
minimum of 25' before turning or tapering. Yours looks just a couple feet short.
Also, need to call out the beginning and end of the taper so that it can be laid out in
the field.
93 9/12/2: See detail 7-29b for the attached sidewalk version of the pedestrian ramp.
Design the ramp as shown in this detail.
94 9/12/2: A trash enclosure is shown in the drainage and utility easement located in
the NE corner of the site and very close to the proposed storm line. No structures
are allowed in drainage and utility easements. Who owns this structure and which
property is being encroached upon? Is this a permanent structure?
95 9/12/2: Show and label the proposed drainage and utility easement in the NE corner
of the site.
102 9/12/2: The proposed grades show a 2 - 3' drop in the ramp in the northeast corner
of the site. This is not ADA compliant. Also, what is the slope on the sidewalk in the
northwest corner? Does this meet ADA requirements?
Page 4
October 31, 2002
Mr. Troy Jones
City of Fort Collins Planning Department
281 North College Ave.
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
RE: Project No.: Ed Carroll Motors
Dear Troy:
The attached prints of Ed Carroll Motors -Lot Expansion II, Project Development Plan, Site and
Landscape Plan, reflect revisions made in accordance with the comments in your letter of
September 25, 2002. Our specific response to each comment is noted below, using numbering
shown on your letter.
Current Planning Comments
General
85. Noted_
105, We have reduced the number of trees in the landscape islands to one per island and
provided additional separation from trees and light poles. (see Landscape Plan)
106. The perimeter fencing has been noted on the drawings. The chain link fence will be
vinyl clad and the fence at the north property line will match the existing wood rail
style fence that currently exists.
107. Noted. Vie have addressed those comments with this submittal.
108. Noted.
109. The shrubs to be relocated have been indicated on the Landscape Plan.
I10. We have included the light fixture specifications with this submittal (see attached
sheets). 'We have proposed the following based on the photometrics sheets submitted
with the previous submittal:
a. Type L 14L — Lithonia Lighting KSF3 1000S R4-HS
i. Single fixture, 25' mounting height, white, square pole.
b. 'I'ype I,34 — Lithonia Lighting KSF2 4005 R3
i. Twin fixture, 25' mounting height, white, square pole.
111. The existing trash enclosure is to remain.
EnEineering
General
49. We provided a 7' attached walk to match the existing 7' walk. The existing ROW is
40' along this property and has been accurately dimensioned on the attached plans.
Phil
6. Statement of Ownership and Notice of Other Documents have been corrected.
EI\PRL)j= FILESAND E15 %\DOSS ReSMAIT 116 ozooc
Name
Date
Paoe 2
9. RR and Ditch ROW and easements have been shown and a public access easement
has been included for the sidewalk where is extends over the ROW. We have
provided 15' from the back of the existing sidewalk for a total of 17.35' from the
ROW.
19. The date occurs in three places on the plat — in the titleblock, under the plat title, and
in the witness our hands statement.
20. The 24' access easement has been labeled as Public Access and Utility Easement.
88. The words "Subdivision" and "2nd Filing" have been removed from the project title.
Site
87. Note 91 has been removed from the Project Notes and that information has been
shown on the Site Plan.
Site/Landscape
39. All drawings have been coordinated to show the attached sidewalk as 7' to match the
existing sidewalk width a variance is being requested to have the walk attached. The
ramps have been drawn the same on all drawings. We have provided a transition from
the existing 5' walk to the proposed 7' walk and have made the transition over a 6'
longitudinal distance. The sidewalk in the NE corner of the site has been removed
since there isn't a pedestrian connection to the north in this location.
40. We have corrected the scaling issue and have made the 10' utility easement 17.35'
from the ROW and labeled it as a "Utility and Pedestrian Access Easement'. i, � I
43. We have made the spelling corrections and Property Description, Attorney's
Certificate and the Planning & Zoning Approval Certificate redline corrections.
86. The 24' dimension has been removed from the access drive and it has been labeled
"Public Access and Utility Easement".
Utility
12. The vicinity map has been changed to 10" x 10".
14. Added complete set of construction notes on new sheet 2.
17. The plat information has been shown on the utility plan, including the temporary
construction easement to the north. The street ROW is 40', the ditch easement is 40',
the RR ROW is 100', and the temporary construction easement is 20'.
18. The driveway has been dimensioned and located, radii have been dimensioned and
conform to with the City Standards. Revised radius to 20'.
23. The 24' dimension has been removed from the Public Access Easement.
25. A variance is being requested for the attached 7' walk along McClelland and will be
added to line 48 after approval.
r:.vxmo-,rniiaar,un =rn�xva:-tinnun�eu: ooc
Name
Date
Page 3
30. A 20' temporary construction easement has been provided for tying into the storm
line within the adjacent lot. A temporary construction easement has been provided
for improvements that impact the lot to the east.
34. The redlines have been corrected.
35. Standard erosion notes have been added to note sheet.
38. Detail 16-4d has been included as well as details 7-20a, 16-1, 16-2, 16-4d, 7-29a, and
7-29b of the LCUASS.
48. Centerline stationing has been included.
89. "Carroll" has been corrected.
90. Subdivision has been removed from line 19 of general notes.
91. All of this curb is outfall — no transition on the north curb of driveway, all of south
curb is infall along driveway. The transitions have been indicated.
92. Revised drive for 25' perpendicular and centerline stationing for taper.
93. Both ramps have been revised at the driveway.
94. Blocked out easement around trash enclosure. The enclosure is partly on both
properties. It was built for both building envelopes. The enclosure will remain.
95. The proposed drainage and utility easement in the NE corner of the site has been
labeled and shown.
102. Northwest corner walk grades have been revised and a retaining wall has been added.
Light & Power
General
54. Noted.
Stormwater Utility
Drainage
57. Detention pond has been revised to provide the required volume.
58. Freeboard has been provided.
60. Finish Floor Elevation for the building to the east of the site has been provided.
104. Sidewalk in the detention pond has been graded to meet ADA compliance.
F,rosion Control
62. Erosion control notes/schedule has been added to sheet 2.
103. Previous comments have been addressed.
Plat
101. Labeled easement with Book 2282 and Page 2253.
1. ItOJP I HLI, I 11,•2151 UVt) IILSI l%.11l'II 1n,➢OC
Name
Date
Page 4
Transportation Planning
Plat
100. We have a 17.35' Utility and Pedestrian Access Easement along the entire frontage.
Water Wastewater
Utility
70. The water line has been potholed and adequate separation has been provided.
96. Done.
97. Revised location of service and curb stop and meter.
98. Changed service to'd'.
99. Noted.
Find the following attachments and respective number of copies:
(5) Site Plan
(5) Plat
(4) Site/Landscape Plan
(4) Utility Plans
(1) Drainage Report
(1) Lighting Specifications
Redliined plans
Please contact our office, should you have any questions regarding this resubmittal.
Sincerely,
Jim Sell Design, Inc;.
z4xd7�—u/
Matthew J. Blakely
Landscape Architect/Project Manager
cc:
John Carroll — Ed Carroll Motor Company
Dick Rutherford — Stewart & Associates
JSD Files
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
Current Plannins
DATE: Febraary 11, 2002 TO: Transfort
PROJECT: #5-98A Ed Carroll Motors Lot Expansion PDP - Type I
(LUC)
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
March 13, 2002
Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
City of Fort Collins
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: December 4, 2002 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #5-98A ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION
— TYPE I (LUC)
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the
staff review meeting:
December 30, 2002
❑ No Comment
❑ Problenns or Concerns (see below or attached)
**iPLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
r3wni�/fiPY t LEGAL- CLOSE,
.2 w11Q5h,ej eS IK ttie 0iGitiAy wigp. ?
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site _ Drainage Report Other
Datgdh� u�r...o r g _ LandscapeSignature:_
Project Comments Sheet
(0000 Selected Departments
City of hurt Cullins
Department: Engineering
Date: December 19, 2002
Project: ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION PDP
All comments must be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than
the staff review meeting:
December 30, 2002
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
49
3/20/2: Provide a detached sidewalk, additional ROW and 15' utility easements along McClelland. Exact ROW
requirements are to be determined in a meeting this Friday. Contact myself at 221-6605 or Tom Reif in Transportation
Planning 416-2040.
9/12/2: Research by the city staff has shown that the this particular lot has already dedicated 50' of ROW in 1978 with
the McClelland Special Improvement District. The additional 28' of ROW required to improve McClelland to a minor
arterial will be purchased by the city at a later date. However, the project will need to continue to keep those future
improvements in mind when designing the site as they have been. Just a few things that need to be coordinated on the
plan sets, however. The plat is currently showing the 50' ROW but the utility plans are showing only 40'. The
Site/Landscape plans call out 50' but do not scale out as 50'. All plan sets will need to be coordinated to show the
correct ROW, as well as the existing RR and Ditch Co. ROW and/or easements. The project will still be required to
dedicate a 15' utility easement from the back of walk. The project would need to submit a variance request to install
attached 8' sidewalks to match the existing attached walks and Engineering would be favorable to granting that request.
A Public Access Easement would need to be dedicated on the plat and shown on the plans sets for the area that the
sidewalk extends past the existing ROW. This project must also provide the temporary construction easement to do the
off -site work on the storm line. Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions.
12/18/02: The variance request was returned by fax for more information on 12/10/02, Please resubmit the variance
request in accordance with 1.9.4 of LCLASS.
Topic: Plat
9
3/20/2: Clearly define all existing and proposed easements and ROW.
9/12/2: Show and dimension the exisiting RR and Ditch ROW and/or easement. Show all off site drainage and utility
easements to the north and provide the reception numbers. Provide a Public Access Easement for the area that the
attached sidewalk extends over the existing ROW. Need to coordinate the various plan sets to present the same
information.
12/18/02: Change "Pedestrian Easement" to "Public Access Easement" as requested above.
Signatzrre Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
Topic: Site/Landscape
43
3/20/2: See redlines for spelling error in the crosswalk label and correction to the Property Description, Attorney's
Certificate and the Planning & Zoning Approval certificate. See attached.
9/12/2: Repeat.
114
The Project ID Sign can not be located within the 15' utility easement.
115
Show the temporary construction easement for the newly proposed retaining wall on the north side of the property.
116
Change the "Pedestrian" Access Easement to "Public" Access easement.
Topic: Utility
30
3/20/2, All offsite improvements require an easement. All offsite grading requires a temporary construction easement.
9/12/2: Provide a temporary construction easement for tieing into the stormline that's in the adjacent property owner's
lot.
12/18/02: The temporary construction easement provided with the last submittal is being returned. Please resubmit
with the appropriate exhibits and signatures. Also, the legal description does not close and may not be described
correctly. Please provide an additional temporary construction easement for the newly proposed retaining wall on the
north side of the property.
35
3/20/2: Contact Bob Zakely at 224-6063 for drainage and erosion control notes.
12/19/02: Drainage and erosion control notes are specific to the project and determined by Bob Zakely. Please contact
him at the above number.
112
Line 48 of the General Notes needs to be more specific. The variance for the separation distance must include the
distance the code required and the actual distance granted by the variance. The variance for the detached/attached
sidewalk needs to state the actual widths, code vs variance. This is so that anybody looking at the plans 10 years from
now will know exactly what the variance was granted for without having to research the actual documents themselves
(which may or may not be stored in the same building).
113
Index - Remove the word "Subdivision" from the Plat.
117
Provide more information on the newly proposed retaining wall along the north property line (height, width, footings,
etc)
Page 2
aftFINAL COMPLIANCE
City of Foy Collins COMMENT SHEET
IEEE'
Current Planning
DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: h.5-98A ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION
PDP — TYPE I (LUC) 5 S
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no Later than the staff
review meeting:
April 16, 2003
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
!, aou N,A,'� 7 L, EG R" cC ash.
TGtc_ Q�i I� �'I I Ac.e 1- A- Dhc,i-�,q Vie_ e-5'-`+14-, i ��,1 Cie 1A��
r �-
O WI cc F4 V b� dUC-S Ll fi t G. j. I �i�M,l� `tom '�2.. N.. S
-1 kt5 rl,4.
J (�c C,cJ C �JFL,-r` t) .�1J1J t 1 l 61),j
a L,�i i o Q �(fc LC.U/)
C �O PLj,1 - A, -TVAG- -1S� G � IC ��L,c t->t, .1 V1-A-11-1
t�
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
(Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
tk u'�'ntfi�,
Gty of Fort Collins
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
City of Fort Collin.
Department: Engineering
Date: April 21, 2003
Project:
ED CARROL.L MOTORS LOT EXPANSION PDP & FINAL COMPLIANCE 5-
98E
All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
April 16, 2003
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 49 Created: 3/20/2002
3/20/2: Provide a detached sidewalk, additional ROW and 15' utility easements along McClelland. Exact ROW
requirements are to be determined in a meeting this Friday. Contact myself at 221-6605 or Tom Reif in Transportation
Planning 416-2040.
9/12/2: Research by the city staff has shown that the this particular lot has already dedicated 50' of ROW in 1978 with
the McClelland Special Improvement District. The additional 28' of ROW required to improve McClelland to a minor
arterial will be purchased by the city at a later date. However, the project will need to continue to keep those future
improvements in mind when designing the site as they have been. Just a few things that need to be coordinated on the
plan sets, however. The plat is currently showing the 50' ROW but the utility plans are showing only 40'. The
Site/Landscape plans call out 50' but do not scale out as 50'. All plan sets will need to be coordinated to show the
correct ROW, as well as the existing RR and Ditch Co. ROW and/or easements. The project will still be required to
dedicate a 15' utility easement from the back of walk. The project would need to submit a variance request to install
attached 8' sidewalks to match the existing attached walks and Engineering would be favorable to granting that request.
A Public Access Easement would need to be dedicated on the plat and shown on the plans sets for the area that the
sidewalk extends past the existing ROW. This project must also provide the temporary construction easement to do the
off -site work on the storm line. Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions.
12/18/02: The variance request was returned by fax for more information on 12/10/02. Please resubmit the variance
request in accordance with 1.9.4 of LCUASS.
4/15/1 The variance request for the attached sidewalk is approved.
Number: 125 Created: 4/18/2003
Dedicated a permanent utility easement for the fire hydrant by plat rather than by separate document since you are
already reptatting and the 'by separate document" was not receieved.
Topic: Plat
Number: 111
Created: 1 /3/2003
Dalf if
CHECK HrRE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS r
Plat _ I Site Drainage Report Other�t' 4
Utility _ Redline Utility --- [— Landscaped
Page I Agolile4rL f C046ll
TV 4044-1�4
From Technical Services: What are the dashed lines in the vicinity map?
4/15/3: Please label the dashed lines in the vicinity map
Number: 126 Created: 4/18/2003
From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close.
Number: 127 Created: 4/18/2003
From Technical Services: The utility, access and drainage easement in McClelland Office Park does not continue to
the easement on this plat.
Topic: Utility
Number: 30 Created: 3/20/2002
3/20/2: All offsite improvements require an easement. All offsite grading requires a temporary construction easement.
9/12/2Provide a temporary construction easement for tying into the storm line that's in the adjacent property owner's
lot.
12/18/02: The temporary construction easement provided with the last submittal is being returned. Please resubmit
with the appropriate exhibits and signatures. Also, the legal description does not close and may not be described
correctly. Please provide an additional temporary construction easement for the newly proposed retaining wall on the
north side of the property.
4/15/3: Repeat comment. Please resubmit the RECORDED temporary construction easement along with the
appropriate exhibit for the west 10' ft of the National Subdivision to the east.
As per the Staff review meeting 4/16/3, it was agreed that a letter from the effected property owners to the north would
be all that was required in lieu of the more formal temporary construction easements. The letter should state that they
are aware of the construction taking place on their property and agree to allow it to take place. Please call if you have
any questions.
Page 2
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collin
Current Planning
DATE: February 11, 2002 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #5-98A Ed Carroll Motors Lot Expansion PDP - Type I
(;LUC) S"tS C�
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
March 13, 2002
EGMG 5 U OZ . MAP
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
1. $OJtJ V A e Y C1 aSES, ,
Z. SJ/3 Tr -re C OF /c +r 5!4c)Ut-6 54`; L o �r
cX,a Tr inl 7�
3 1RCA r- .A (-16TC_ VA- A rtNS �81'xt s-riNS
Ra bGo t c/3Tt r j( 4�, diJ 7-t-4 t S c,AT
7. JUUrH LINQ� l7isi 1"ltSs�J Tff� P�fri � �.C�3
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
VPlat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
City of Fort Collins
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Citv of Port Collins
Department: Engineering
Date: March 20, 2002
Project: ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION PDP
All comments must be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than
the staff review meeting:
March 13, 2002
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
45 Please split out the Site and Landscape plans into separate sheets for clarity.
46 No monument signs allowed in the ROW.
49 Provide a detached sidewalk, additional ROW and 15' utility easements along
McClelland. Exact ROW requirements are to be determined in a Transportation
Planning meeting this Friday. Contact myself at 221-6605 or Tom Reif in
Transportation Planning 416-2040.
50 The gated entrance on the northwest side is too close to McClelland and presents a
conflict. Drivers exiting from this drive aisle may not see northbound drivers on
McClelland making an east bound right. Suggest either closing this entrance
completely if not needed or moving it over to the east one drive aisle.
Topic: Pavement
5 From Rick Richter, Pavement Management: No comment.
Topic: Plat
6 Make corrections to the Statement of Ownership and Notice of Other Documents -
see redlines.
7 Provide statements of the dedication of any easements, ROW, tracts, and other
public areas. Provide a note referencing fact that previous easements are being
vacated.
Provide 2 tie to section corners.
'� 5 Z
arm! re Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat _ Site Drainage Report Other �=
Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
9 Clearly define all existing and proposed easements and ROW.
19 Provide the date under the legal description.
20 The 24' access easement is not labeled correctly - it is not a consistent 24' across for
the entire length of the drive. Please label as "Public Access Easement".
21 Provide the Notice box for Private Drives. See attached.
Topic: Site/Landscape
39 Dimension the sidewalk widths.
40 Show, dimension all easements, property lines, ROW, and utilities.
41 Remove the :spot elevations and contours for clarity.
42 Existing features adjacent to or within the development need to be shown in a
ghosted or alternate line weight.
43 See redlines for spelling error in the crosswalk label and correction to the Property
Description, Attorney's Certificate and the Planning & Zoning Approval certificate.
See attached.
Topic: Utility
10 Complete and submit the checklist, Appendix E-4.
11 Cover Sheet: Provide legal description below the project name and take out the
word "subdivision" from the title.
12 Cover Sheet: The vicinity map must be 10" x 10".
13 Cover Sheet: Renumber the index as shown.
14 Provide the Construction Notes, see appendix E-2. Section A not shown - is it not
needed?
15 Provide the soils report as stated in line 19 of the General Notes.
16 Provide the Stewart's fax number in the title block.
17 Provide ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions and labels. Add to
legend.
18 Dimension driveway width and location. Radii must be in accordance with Table 8-2
and widths must meet 7-29b. Label all radii. Driveway must also conform to
standard drawing 7-30.
22 Provide directional ramps at the driveway in accordance with 16-4d.
23 Add the Utility and Access Easements to all sheets and show on plan.
Page 2
24 Show the Utility and Access Easements.
25 Provide the variance to the driveway separation requirements in line 48 of the
General Notes.
26 Provide the drainage flow arrows as noted in the Legend.
27 Add the note that all access/driveway approaches are paved with Portland cement
from the street to the ROW on the utility sheet.
28 Remove the 10' dimension from the asphalt cut. See redlines.
29 The landscape plans show a gate in several places - please show the gate on the
utility plan as well.
30 All offsite improvements require an easement. All offsite grading requires a
temporary construction easement.
31 Show how the: proposed sidewalk ties into the existing on the NW corner. Add a
note that the proposed sidewalk will match existing or tie into existing sidewalk -
something worded to that effect.
32 Dimension the parking stall width and length, typical.
33 Label the interior medians as "outfall" curb and gutter, see redlines.
34 See redlines for other comments.
35 Contact Bob 7_akely at 224-6063 for drainage and erosion control notes.
36 Possibly missing a contour line, see redlines, NW corner.
37 Please make sure that the detail sheet mylar is of reproducible quality - some of
these lines are indistinct.
38 Provide the following details, LCUASS 7-20a, 16-1, 16-2, 16-4d, 7-29a, 7-29b and
any detail as required by the design.
44 The site/landscape plan show an existing light pole in the new driveway, NW corner.
Please show and label as being removed or relocated.
47 Are you meeting the minimum desirable flowline grade around the curb returns of
1 %?
48 Provide stationing at all PCs and driveway intersections.
Page 3
L7- Project Comments Sheet
1° Selected Departments
l ilNnt !'urtCullins
�siww
Department: Engineering
Date: March 20, 2002
Project: ED CARROLL MOTORS LOT EXPANSION PDP
All comments muss: be received by TROY JONES in Current Planning no later than
the staff review meeting:
March 13, 2002
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
45 Please split out the Site and Landscape plans into separate sheets for clarity.
46 No monument signs allowed in the ROW.
49 Provide a detached sidewalk, additional ROW and 15' utility easements along
McClelland. Exact ROW requirements are to be determined in a Transportation
Planning meeting this Friday. Contact myself at 221-6605 or Tom Reif in
Transportation Planning 416-2040.
50 The gated entrance on the northwest side is too close to McClelland and presents a
conflict. Drivers exiting from this drive aisle may not see northbound drivers on
McClelland making an east bound right. Suggest either closing this entrance
completely if not needed or moving it over to the east one drive aisle.
Topic: Pavement
5 From Rick Richter, Pavement Management: No comment.
Topic: Plat
v 6 Make corrections to the Statement of Ownership and Notice of Other Documents -
see redlines.
7 Provide statements of the dedication of any easements, ROW, tracts, and other
public areas. Provide a note referencing fact that previous easements are being
vacated.
LBO Provide 2 ties,to section corners. T i
I. 7. ie i
r / It
Date
CIIEOW IIERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat _ I Site Drainage Report / Other 1-7' 4-
Utility _ X Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
9 Clearly define all existing and proposed easements and ROW.
19 Provide the date under the legal description.
20 The 24' access easement is not labeled correctly - it is not a consistent 24' across for
the entire length of the drive. Please label as "Public Access Easement".
21 Provide the Notice box for Private Drives. See attached.
Topic: Site/Landscape
39 Dimension the sidewalk widths.
40 Show, dimension all easements, property lines, ROW, and utilities.
41 Remove the spot elevations and contours for clarity.
42 Existing features adjacent to or within the development need to be shown in a
ghosted or alternate line weight.
43 See redlines for spelling error in the crosswalk label and correction to the Property
Description, Attorney's Certificate and the Planning & Zoning Approval certificate.
See attached.
Topic: Utility
49-� Complete and submit the checklist, Appendix E-4. T d�c(
✓l 1 Cover Sheet: Provide legal description below the project name and take out the
word "subdivision" from the title.
a1� Cover Sheet: The vicinity map must be 10" x 10".
✓13 Cover Sheet: Renumber the index as shown.
14� Provide the Construction Notes, see appendix E-2. Section A not shown - is it not
needed? w e, N 4 )4!.1 pa.tx s t ieu+r:h, .4
+-S ' Provide the soils report as stated in line 19 of the General Notes. w e 1 l loll 15 r-c, P-,oe.i :r
✓16 Provide the Stewart's fax number in the title block.
✓17 Provide ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions and labels. Add to
legend.
4.81 Dimension driveway width and location. Radii must be in accordance with Table 8-2
and widths must meet 7-29b. Label all radii. Driveway must also conform to
standard drawing 7-30. LJ t ai .( t ;.
122 Provide directional ramps at the driveway in accordance with 16-4d.
23 Add the Utility and Access Easements to all sheets and show on plan.
Page 2