The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWATERGLEN SELF STORAGE - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2004-07-19(,-a F- R t�� n F n- ,1 2002 construction company, Inc. 909 EAST SIXTY-SECOND AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80216 • (303) 287-5525 November 21, 2002 Steve Olt, City Planner City of Fort Collins Planning Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Re: Waterglen Self Storage Fort Collins, CO. Dear Steve: dcb construction Co. and Vista Ventures would like to extend our appreciation to you and your staff on providing us a very quick and concise response to our initial submittal of Waterglen Self Storage. We have thoroughly reviewed the comments that were faxed to us and offer the following response to each item. We have listed each of our response items below as they were presented. This second submittal also includes the re -platting package from JR Engineering. Our intentions are to submit construction plans to the building department prior to Thanksgiving. Upon receipt of this package, please free to contact me directly with any questions or concerns. It appears that our upfront meetings with yourself provided us the direction to address the existing PUD correctly. We are including product data, site photo's, and landscaping backup to further assist in our re -submittal. Current Planning -General Issues: 1. Please refer to attached plans for added fence detail. This is the fence detail that was discussed earlier with you for your approval. construction professionals since 1964 aCt7 —� 2. The horizontal metal siding on the storage units provides numerous items that relate directly to the residential units. The metal siding provided on the self storage units resembles the lapped masonite on each of the residences in the proximity of this site. We have attached a profile of the metal siding for your review. Again, this profile emulates very closely the profile of the masonite siding. The centerline distance from Rib to Rib is 6" in length. The residential homes have ribbed masonite siding in either 8" or 4" lengths. Our color pallet has been attached for use. We have identified the body color of the units and the accent and trim colors as well. These colors are predominant in the residential area. We would also like to point out that the paint color will be a flat finish and very durable overtime. `"" In regards to adding of masonry to the eastern side of the office structure (bldg 1), we have attached photos of the site for your review. Each of these homes, along 1-25 adjacent to our site, does not have any brick masonry along this side. We would request approval to keep our plans as designed. '"** Refer to the landscape plan for the revised landscaping along the residential southern side. Additional landscaping has been revised to best meet this requirement. 3. The pavement of this facility, as recommended by our Geo- technical Engineers, is Asphalt. 4. Refer to revised attached plans for enhanced landscaping along the open fenced areas. These areas are very thick in landscaping. We have attached a cut sheet and general information on this plant material. 5. In previous discussions regarding the existing landscaping along Waterglen Drive and adjacent to the eastern property line, It was determined that the initial landscape construction of this lot met the approved PUD. All materials in this area outside of the building lines will remain as approved on this prior PUD. We have thoroughly surveyed the site and confirmed this is accurate. construction professionals since 1964 ac Zoning: 1. Refer to attached plan for added fence detail. We attached and noted the color of this perimeter fence. This fence color will match the body of the self storage units. 2. Dimensions from the building to property line have been added to sheet MA-1 as requested. Engineering: 1. Here attached to our revised package is the re -plat of all of tract W as required. This submittal has been completed by JR Engineering for your review and approval. Stormwater: 1. As per attached civil re -plating plans, the drainage easement has been vacated. Refer to the grading plan within the set provided. Thank you again. Please forward any comments to me directly at 303.746.7013 with any questions. Sincerely; Barr�A. Sherman Vice President of Design dcb construction co. inc. cc: John Barna Ken Crumb Darren Zethre Project Manager dcb construction co. inc construction professionals since 1964 NOV-20-02 02:44P P.013 rr(;.6670 II 51/64 36* �D T �I 3.5136' POU ROOF PANEL U WAI.1 PANEL (inverted PRU HWf PeneO J.' LI—Nand J.i- 1/5i 17 YOIO, •q IOInYM! .,^ ' orneW ,0Y1an[e O rM r/- 1/16' i � 4OO 1 OnN- FIGURE I Standard Paint l for RiboRoof"Panel aav ;; p ___ Optional Colors are Available as Cl_i5 1\ l B ROOF . Cerma-A-Star 950 Paint Svs`em AKZO Nobel Coatings RiboRoof Panel {tir, J"tt�M :"pa�(is eCSVN b tt ,i�� g4 d;N` I <�Y.�e vi xjlylq t�e(ers- •` A X,'SfJT * Tau" Manufacturing Facilities nio •nvvr �rv�. 2745 N. Locust Ave • Rialto, CA 92377 (909) 875-8529 • Fax (909) 823-4786 CA License U610595 Tennessee RIB -ROOF INC. 570 Morrison Rd. • Rossville. TN 38066 (901) 853-9062 • Fax (901) 8b3-2393 �, , �'� 4 4 .�P :. - ti, ram.--� ,, y ^� �� ':;.... �� r . N. 1 yl � �� , Via.,",5...�._ .`� t �, D� �A � f� .- , f F J � �<xl � K� May 30, 2003 Mr. Basil Hamdan City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 J J R ENGINEERING RE: Waterglen P.U.D. — Drainage Addendum for Tract W, "Waterglen Self Storage" Dear Basil: We are pleased to submit for your review and approval this addendum showing the minor changes being made to the approved Tract W, Waterglen P.U.D. dated 11/6/98. Tract W is still considered a commercial development as previously approved in the Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report Waterglen, P.U.D. dated August 11, 1997 and the Addendum to Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report Waterglen, P.U.D. dated May 18, 1999. The only existing basins affected by the revised development are Basins S-1, T-3 & 0-3R. Attached is sheet 29A/31A of 84 showing the revisions to Tract W. Existing basin S-1 has reduced in size by 0.27 acres from 7.74 acres to 7.47 acres of commercial area. This contributing area on Tract W currently drains across the existing residential lots to the south. With this proposed development the contributing area is redirected to basin 0-3R. This will thereby reduce the amount of water going to design point 22 and reduce the resulting carryover to design point 25 and existing Pond D. Existing basin T-3 has also reduced in size. The current size of basin T-3 is 2.99 acres. The revised basin is 2.55 acres. The difference of contributing area, being 0.44 acres, will be directed towards basin 0-3R. This will reduce the amount of runoff to design point 21 and existing Pond D. Basin 0-3R was reported in the May 1999 Addendum as having a contributing area of 6.53 acres and a runoff coefficient (C) of 0.35. With this addendum, the revised area of basin 0-3R is 7.24 acres and a revised C of 0.41. The time of concentration shall remain the same at 23.8 minutes for the 10-year and 100-year events as shown in the approved drainage report mentioned above. This means that the peak flow from Basin 0-3R is increased from 16.9 cfs to 17.5 cfs in the 100- year event. Basin 0-3R ultimately releases into existing Pond F. Existing Pond F contains all the required water quality capture volume for the runoff originating in the contributing areas to existing Ponds D, E and F. Therefore, changing the sizes of the 2020 Past Prospect Road, Suite 190, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-491 '9888 • Fax:970-491-9984 • www.irengineering.com current basins and rerouting the water to the existing ponds will not affect the water quality volumes required as mentioned in the approved drainage report. Existing Ponds D, E, and F were all modeled by Lidstone & Anderson, Inc. and reported in the Regional Drainage Evaluation for the Waterglen P.U.D. dated November 30, 1998. These ponds are hydraulically connected in the following manner. Pond D's outlet releases into Pond E and Pond E's outlet releases into Pond F. Pond F discharges into Cooper Slough. The pond outlets act as orifices and the water surface of each pond produces a tail water effect on the upstream pond's outlet. Therefore, the water surface of Pond F controls the release of Pond E and the water surface of Pond E controls the release of Pond D. The proposed development will redirect the runoff from the revised basins to Pond F instead of the current flow path to Pond D. This will raise the water surface of Pond F faster than originally designed. However, this will in turn restrict the releases from Pond E until Pond E builds enough head to push flows through its outlet structure. The water surface elevation in Pond E required to do this will still be the same water surface elevation as in the approved drainage report for Waterglen P.U.D. As the water surface in Pond E rises, the flows leaving Pond D will be restricted until the water surface elevation in Pond D reaches the same water surface elevation as that approved in the above mentioned drainage report for Waterglen P.U.D. The control in this situation is the sizing of the pond outlets acting as orifices and the required head differential between ponds to pass the previously designed flows. JR Engineering has reviewed and concluded that the revised development will not negatively impact the site storm sewer system in any way and that the existing detention ponds are adequately sized for the proposed development. All computations within this addendum have been completed in compliance with the most recent rainfall data and the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria. We appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this If you have any questions or need additional information please call (970) 491- PQO RP�� 3HA{yN,sTF,9 Prepared by: evi: ey-- :. o A Amber Kauffman, E.. M Design Engineer II Di X-\3o10M) ii11\3914510\Word\Lcllcn\dru111agc updaec.J,k