HomeMy WebLinkAboutCENTERPOINT PLAZA - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-11-04PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current PlanninE
DATE: September 4, 2001
TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #35-01 Centerpoint Plaza PDP, Type I (LUQ
e,
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning no
later than the staff review meeting:
October 3, 2001
Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference
C� i /--�Tc-m( NT
' StiN i 5 1C01
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
AS d CJ�r NO
City of Fort Collins
STEWART&ASSOCIATES
July 8, 2002 Consulting Engineers and Surveyors
CENTERPOINT PLAZA, PDP
ANSWERS TO ENGINEERING ISSUES
32, APE issues are by traffic engineer.
74 Cash escrow is the direction we have always gone for Timberline Road.
75. Midpoint/Timberline intersection also part of cash escrow from our understanding.
106. If we have a Phase Plan what are you saying? This does not seem logical - but if City stuff why
be logical.
46. All easements needed are shown.
103. Easement extended to East.
104. Railroad spur easement not deeded to city - now exists.
54 Showed walk on Timberline to be constructed with Phase I.
59. All sheets now show walk at back of new RIGHT-OF-WAY line.
61 As stated before, we are not going to railroad property for any reason. An offsite easement will
be obtained by the owner for access on East side.
63. We think they are readable. If you see any that are not please mark them.
61 Comments on plans have been addressed.
82. Phasing revised to be consistent.
83 _ Added type 3 barricade to end of walk on Timberline. All of walk constructed with Phase I.
84. See 83 statement.
85. Labeled all buildings
86, Driveways located from property lines.
87. The access drive is 30 feet.
88. Revised walk location.
102. We have supplied a letter from PRPA. They do not sign plats or plans.
Franklin D. Blake
FDB/meh
CNTRPANS.WPU
James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc.
103 S. Meldrum Street • P.O. Box 429 • Ft. Collins, CO 80522
970/482-9331 • Fax 970/482-9382
July 10, 2002
n<-
Steve Olt
Fort Collins Planning Department
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Centerpoint Plaza PDP, Type 1 (LUC), #35-01
Response to staff Project Review comments
Dear Steve,
We have reviewed the staff letter dated May 15`h, 02 and have the following comments:
Department: Current Planning:
Topic: General
113 — Adequate Public Facilities.
The applicant met with Traffic Operations Department and Engineering on 5/28/02 to
discuss and determine the status of the adequate public facilities.
Please see attached memorandum. A copy of the memorandum was sent to
Traffic Operations, Engineering, Transportation Planning and Planning on 6/5/02.
115
The emergency and service / delivery access and parking can be constructed for
either Building A or B. The final parking spaces allowed shall be addressed at
Final Compliance for the one building that is allowed to proceed at that time.
Copies of the Alternative Compliance Plan have been resubmitted in accordance
with the routing sheet although this is plan is now not required. Access and parking
will be addressed for the relevant building as mentioned above at Final Compliance.
'Topic: Landscape Plan
108
The landscape was reduced so as to meet the landscape budget requirements of the
project. The planting beds against Buildings A and B and a planting bed between the
two crosswalks north of the existing warehouse were the areas where it was identified,
where this could be achieved without impacting the overall planting design or remove
from screening under Section 3.2.1 (E) (4) and (6). Planting has been adjusted to the
parking islands as the layout of these has changed.
109
Landscape screening to the loading / service area south of Building B. Planting has been
added to this area per Section 3.2.1 (E) (6).
110
Landscape screening to the 2 trash enclosures south of Building B. Additional planting
has been added.
ill
Note #13 on the Landscape Plan general notes. This note has been revised in accordance
with the red -lined comments on the Landscape Plan.
116
All Summit Ash street trees have been moved east and are 5' from the back of the
proposed 7' wide sidewalk. Sheri Wamhoff, from Engineering confirmed the 5' from
back of curb verbally on 5/22/02.
117
The westemmost Marshall's Ash street tree has been removed / eliminated due to the
possibility that the turning radius from Timberline Road into Midpoint Drive may have to
be increased, potentially impacting that tree. Sheri Wamhoff from Engineering confirmed
verbally on 5/22/02 that this tree should be removed from the Landscape Plan for the
above reason.
Topic: Site Plan
101
The Burlington Northern Railroad, along the southwest side of the site has been changed
to the Great Western Railroad.
112
The building use data breakdown as shown on the Site Plan had incorrect information for
Buildings B and C for the estimated employees. This is now correctly shown on the land
use statistics.
114
Based on the information provided by the client on the potential building occupancy
two trash enclosures have been identified as being required for Building B.
Department: Engineering
32 — Adequate Public Facilities
Please see item 113 — Current Planning General.
74
Acknowledged.
75
Acknowledged.
Topic: General
106
Acknowledged.
107
Acknowledged.
Topic: Landscape Plan
44
All Summit Ash street trees have been moved east and are 5' from the back of the
proposed 7' sidewalk. Sheri Wamhoff, confirmed the 5' from back of curb verbally
on 5/22/02.
81
Phasing is shown on the Landscape Plan.
Topic: Plat
See Civil Engineers response.
Topic: Site Plan
35
A 7- foot wide sidewalk is shown along Timberline. A note has been added to the Site
Plan stating that the existing 5-foot existing asphalt walk is to be removed at a future
date.
41
Acknowledged.
79
This has been corrected on the Utility Plans.
80
This has been corrected on the Utility Plans.
105
A note has been added on the Site Plan concerning the future shared access to the
property to the east.
Topic: Utility Plans
See Civil Engineers response.
Department: Light and Power
Comment 9/10/2001
" Will need to coordinate transformer locations. Any modifications to the electric system
will be at the expense of the developer"
Comment acknowledged.
Department: Natural Resources
71 Existing tree schedule.
VF Ripley met with the City Forester on 5/29/02 to review all the existing trees on the
site and identified on the Landscape Plan. Trees to be retained, replaced, or removed and
mitigated or not mitigated are described in an additional column on the existing trees
schedule. Proposed trees to mitigate those removed are also identified on the proposed
plant list. The format for this was confirmed verbally with Doug Moore on 5/23/02.
72 Prairie Dogs - Acknowledged.
Department: PFA
6
The access roadway radii have been changed to 20 feet.
7 to 10. All items acknowledged.
Department: Police
5 - Lighting
Item 1) Area between Building A and B (west) end. Two additional lights have been
added to the south end of Building A which increases the light levels between the
buildings.
Item 2) Trash area at SW corner to rear of Building B. The light levels have been
increased to the north side of the trash enclosure to ensure adequate light
levels
Item 3) Building A north elevation. All light levels and landscape are acceptable.
The above was discussed and coordinated with Joseph Gerdom on 5/28/02
Topic: Site Plan
100
Lighting see 5- Lighting above.
VF Ripley discussed the landscape materials and the patio layout with Joseph Gerdom
on 5/28/02. The ,Site Plan shows a low seat wall approximately 16" high on the north
and east sides of the patio. Plant material shown is Hughes Juniper, which at maturity
will be approximately 24" high .Joseph Gerdom agreed that the this should not create a
security problem.
Department: Stormwater Utlity
68
See Civil Engineer comments
69 — Landscape Plan
Glen Stewer from Stormwater Utility confirmed on 5/28/02 that the landscape for the
pond area can be a native dryland seed. No additional landscape will be required.
70
Acknowledged. See Civil Engineers comments.
For all other topics please see civil engineer response.
Department; Transportation Planning
27 — Adequate Public Facilities
See comments under Item 113 - Current Planning. A copy of the meeting memorandum
was sent to Traffic Operations, Engineering, Transportation and Planning summarizing
the meeting and items discussed on 6/5/02.
37 — Bike Lanes
The project does not include Midpoint Drive improvements.
Department: Water Wastewater
Please see Civil Engineer comments.
Other comments on from the red -lined Site, Landscape, Utility Plans and Building
Elevations:
Landscape Plan:
1. Lot Two: Shrubs have been added to the planting beds on the west side
of the parking lot.
Lot One — Trash enclosure east of Building A in parking island.
In the last comments / red lines dated 10/12/01 a trash enclosure was requested
to be closer to Building A. The trash enclosure had to be located so that it would
be accessible and also comply with Section 3.5.1(1) (1).
3. Lot One — Planting bed to south west corner of parking lot (see attached
8'/z x 11) No planting can occur in the upper part of the bed as this will be the
location of a future transformer.
4. Lot Two: Planting north of Building C. Additional planting has been added
around the proposed patio.
plant List. Plant species — Buddleia davidii `Argentea' is a plant selected from
the Fort Collins Nursery catalog. Please see attached description.
6. plant symbols have been corrected.
Site Plan.
1. Future sidewalk from south line of Lot One across the Great Western Railroad.
Comment acknowledged.
Building Elevations:
1. Building A. South elevation. No door is at this location. The sidewalk has been
adjusted on the Site Plan.
Building C. South elevation. The landscape and planting bed has been
adjusted on the Landscape Plan.
Utility Plans:
See Civil Engineer comments and plans.
Comments from Staff Review May 81h 2002
Engineering:
1. The Site, Landscape and Utility plans have been coordinated to ensure all plans
are consistent.
2. See comment 44 under Engineering.
3. See comment 113 — Current Planning — General
Stormwater:
See Civil Engineer comments.
Traffic Operations:
1. See comment 113 — Current Planning — General
2. Traffic Operations were sent the "highway capacity sheets" on 4/11/02.
3. Engineering to determine.
4. Acknowledged.
Transportation Planning:
Items 1 to 3. Engineering to determine.
Current Plannine:
1. Lighting Plan. A revised Lighting Plan was submitted with the last submittal
dated 4/12/02. The Lighting Plan has been revised with the comments from the
Police Department and copies resubmitted.
Please call if you have any questions or need further information.
Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to working with further you
during the development review process.
Sincerely
VF Ripley Associates
1 I L
Louise Herbert
City of Fort Collins
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: July 31, 2002
Project: CENTERPOINT PLAZA PDP, TYPE I (LUC), #35-01
All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the
staff review meeting:
July 31, 2002
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: General
41
Will need to provide an off -site easement for the driveway construction at the northeast
corner of the site.
74
As was previously discussed this development can provide the city with a cash escrow for
the design and construction of the local street portion of the improvements to Timberline
Road adjacent to the site in lieu of doing this work at this time.
75
This development needs to work with the developers of Spring Creek Center in
accomplishing the improvements that are needed at the midpoint timberline intersection to
accommodate truck traffic at this intersection. Improvements to this intersection will be a
condition of approval. (per Traffic) Plans for this improvement will need to be provided and
approved prior to final approval of this project if they have not already been received and
approved.
106
Once this project has gone to hearing (assuming one building and only one building can be
built) the Final Plan submittal will need to only show the work and infrastructure for the one
building to be built. All extra stuff and other building sites and services will need to be taken
off of the plans. Can only put in the infrastructure for the one building.
Because of the APF issues only 1 building can be built - so only 1 building can receive final
approval. Thus only that building that receives final approval and its associated needs
(sidewalk, parking lot services, driveway, etc) can be built. The rest can not be built or
shown on the approved it will not have final approval. When the other building or buildings
CHECK HERE IF YOU
Date
RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat X Site Drainage Report _
k Utility _�_ Redline Utility <_ Landscape
Other
Page I
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: October 5, 2001
Project: CENTERPOINT PLAZA PDP, TYPE I (LUC), #35-01
All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the
staff review meeting:
October 03, 2001
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
32
An adequate public facilities (APF) analysis needs to be done for this project as was identified on
Attachment 'A' Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions of the TIS. It appears that there will
be APF issues on this project. This is needed before the project can consider going forward.
34
Site Plan
The site plan shows the id sign extending into the row. It can not be placed within the row.
35
Site Plan
Show the future 7-foot sidewalk along Timberline Road. It would be best to not have dual walks
along here. Widen out the 5-foot walk on site to meet the 7-foot standard or build and use the 7-foot
walk to meet the connection needs you are showing.
36
Site Plan
The building envelopes are shown extending/ overlapping into the easements. This can not occur.
38
Site Plan
All sidewalks running in front of parking stall must be 6 feet in width minimum. (See figure 5 article 3
p. 39)
39
Site Plan
The drive isle width in the parking lot for double loaded parking spaces is to be a minimum of 24 feet.
Have one labeled as 23.4 feet.
40
Site Plan
The trash enclosure can not be placed over an easement. The enclosure is considered a structure
Signature—',
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH
COPIES OF REVISIONS
X, Plat X Site Drainage Report Other.
Utility Redline Utility_ Landscape
Page l
can be built they will need to come in for final approval with their own set or sets of plans for
the improvements needed to serve that building(s).
107
Will need to provide a letter of intent from the adjacent property owner for the off -site
easement prior to being scheduled for a hearing.
128
If any of the proposed uses within the buildings are changed - the traffic studies will need to
be updated.
Topic: Site Plan
35
Show the future 7-foot sidewalk along Timberline Road. It would be best to not have dual
walks along here. Widen out the 5-foot walk on site to meet the 7-foot standard or build and
use the 7-foot walk to meet the connection needs you are showing. 5/7/02 Need to show
the sidewalk as being built - it will be needed to connect to building B if that is the building to
be built. Will need a sidewalk connection that does not cross a drive isle.
Topic: Utility plans
67
See plans for additional comments.
102
All work within the Platte River Power Authority non -buildable easement needs to be
approved by Platte River power Authority. They will need to sign the plans showing they
approve of the work and improvements shown within their easement.
120
Add indemnification statement back onto the cover sheet
Page 2
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #35-01 Centerpoint Plaza PDP
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
July 31, 2002
ElNo Comment
EDProblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
Date:
Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ Plat _ Site Drainage Report _ Olhef
_ Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape
RECEIVED
:URRENT PLANNING
August 27, 2002
Steve Olt
Fort Collins Planning Department
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, Co 80524
Centerpoint Plaza PDP, Type I (LUC), 434-01
Response to staff Project Review comments
Dear Steve,
VF RIPLEN
V,SO , t„-S , 1.
We have reviewed the staffletter dated August 8, 02 and have the following comments
Department: Current Planning:
TOPIC Zonlnb
124
The applicant met with Planning and Zoning on 8/13/02 to review the permitted uses and
parking. This has been revised in accordance with the permitted and secondary uses in
Section 4.22 Employment Zone and parking under Section 3.2 2(K)(2)(a) and are shown
on the Site Plan. The building data has been changed to show the building square feet
Topic: General
130
The traffic studies for buildings A and B have been rechecked with the permitted uses
and adequate public facilities_ Please see attached revised memorandums for each
building_
113
Acknowledged. B will be submitted for Final Compliance.
115
A plan titled " Schematic Permitted Parking" has been submitted. This shows the
parking and driveways that would be constructed with building B
Topic: Landscape Plan
129
VF Ripley has discussed the landscape comments with Tom McCormick at Platte River
Power Authority and removed all the large tress within the easement. Due to the removal
of the trees additional shrubs have been added to screen the parking on the south west
side of the site. See Landscape Plan.
Topic: Site Plan
Acknowledged. Please see response under item 124 — Zoning under Current Planning
above.
Department: Engineering
Topic: General
See civil engineer's response
Topic: Site Plan
35
A 7-foot sidewalk is shown along Timberline. A note has been added to the Site Plan
stating that the existing 5-foot existing asphalt walk is to be removed at a future date -
This comment was again recheck with Sheri Wamhoffby email on 8/16/02. Sheri
confirmed that the note was tine. Please see attached email.
Topic: Utility Plans
See civil engineer's comment
Department: Natural Resources
Items 71 and I3 I
Comments were addressed directly with Doug Moore during the second round of
comments dated 5/15/02 Doug, Moore reconfirmed that all items have been addressed
and there are no further comments
Department: PFA
Items 6-7
Acknowledged. Nothing to address at this time.
8
Acknowledged. This has been recheck by the civil engineer.
Items 9-10
Acknowledged. Nothing to address at this time
Department: Stormwater Utility
Topic: Erosion and Sediment Control and Offsite Flows
See civil engineer's response
Department: Transportation Planning
27
This item was address during the second round of comments dated 5/15/02.
VF Ripley called Mark Jackson on 8/ 13/02 to recheck the issue. Mark Jackson
reconfirmed he was satisfied that the APF issues had been addressed.
37
There are no improvements occurring along Midpoint Drive. VF Ripley
sent a memo to Mark Jackson 8/24/02 confirming that due to this no bike
lanes will be reflected at this time on Midpoint Drive_ VF Ripley has had
no reply to the memo so we assume that this issue is acceptable Please see
attached memo.
Topic: General
123
Bike Lanes. Please see above
Department: Water Wastewater
See civil engineer's response.
Topic: Utility Plans
See civil engineer's response.
Department: Zoning
Topic: Zoning
119
The uses were reviewed with Planning and Zoning at a meeting on 8/13/02 The
permitted uses and parking analysis information has be revised and is shown on the Site
Plan.
Please call if you have any questions or need further information.
Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to working with further you
during the development review process.
Sincerely
VF Ripley Associates
Louise Herbert
wwmd�.vyammm�
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Department: Engineering
Date: September 6, 2002
Project: CENTERPOINT PLAZA PDP, TYPE I (LUC), #35-01
All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no
later than the staff review meeting:
September 04, 2002
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
41 Will need an off -site easement for the driveway construction at the northeast corner of the site. This
easement will need to be provided with the final compliance submittal. If for some reason the easement can
not be obtained, the plan can not be approved as shown and the layout may have to change to accommodate
access requirement.
74 As was previously discussed this development can provide the city with a cash escrow for the design and
construction of the local street portion of the improvements to Timberline Road adjacent to the site in lieu of
doing this work at this time.
75 This development needs to work with the developers of Spring Creek Center in accomplishing the
improvements that are needed at the midpoint timberline intersection to accommodate truck traffic at this
intersection. Improvements to this intersection will be a condition of approval. (per Traffic) Plans for this
improvement will need to be provided and approved prior to final approval of this project if they have not
already been received and approved.
106 Once this project has gone to hearing (assuming one building and only one building can be built) the Final
Plan submittal will need to only show the work and infrastructure for the one building to be built. All extra stuff
and other building sites and services will need to be taken off of the plans. Can only put in the infrastructure
for the one building. Because of the APF issues only 1 building can be built - so only 1 building can receive
final approval. Thus only that building that receives final approval and its associated needs (sidewalk, parking
lot services, driveway, etc) can be built. The rest can not be built or shown on the approved plan as it will not
have final approval. When the other building or buildings can be built they will need to come in for final
approval with their own set: or sets of plans for the improvements needed to serve that building(s). If building B
is the building proposed to be built 1st the 7 foot sidewalk on Timberline will need to be built with it to provide a
sidewalk connection to the building that does not cross a drive isle.
128 If any of the proposed uses are changed - the traffic studies will need to be updated.
102 All work within the Platte River Power Authority non -buildable easement needs to be approved by Platte River
power Authority. They will need to sign the plans showing they approve of the work and improvements shown within
their easement.
// 2
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility ).1 Landscape
Page I
0000
[Effma-ft"I FINAL COMPLIANCE
City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET
Current Planning
DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #35-02A CENTER POINT PLAZA PDP — FINAL
COMPLIANCE
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
January 29, 2003
Note - ,Please identify your redlines for future reference
Nance (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOE` WISH'FO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plan _Site _Drainaec Report _Other
litv Redline Crility _Landscape
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Port Collins
VF RIPLEY ASSOCIATES Date: 2/6/2003
C/O LOUISE HERBERT
401 W. MOUNTAIN, SUITE 201
FORT COLLINS, CO 80521
Staff has reviewed your submittal for CENTERPOINT PLAZA PDP & FINAL COMPLIANCE
- TYPE I (LUC), #35-01/A, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: Off -site flows
Number: 152 Created: 2/6/2003
The request for alternative compliance to the City's parking allowance is acceptable based on the methods proposed to
ensure that the "center" area of the parking lot will not be used for packing until Building B is constructed. The
developers are being notified at this time that non-compliance with the Parking Code, by allowing parking in the
aforementioned area when only Building A exists, could result in a citation for non-compliance from the Zoning
Department.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: General
Number: 41 Created: 10/2/2001
Will need an off -site easement for the driveway construction at the northeast corner of the site.
This easement will need to be provided with the final compliance submittal. If for some reason the easement
can not be obtained, the plan can not be approved as shown and the layout may have to change to accomidate
access requirement. 2/5/03 not yet provided still needed.
Number: 74 Created: 10/5/2001
As was previously discussed this development can provide the city with a cash escrow
for the design and construction of the local street portion of the improvements to
Timberline Road adjacent to the site in lieu of doing this work at this time. 1/29/03 This
cash in leiu of doing the design and improvements shall include the sidewalk along
Timberline Road and the street trees along Timberline. The sidewalk along Timberline
is not needed as a connection to a public walk for Building A, therefore this sidewalk
should not be shown on the utility plans or the site plans.
Number: 75 Created: 10/5/2001
This development needs to work with the developers of Spring Creek Center in
accomplishing the improvements that are needed at the midpoint timberline intersection
to accommodate truck traffic at this Intersection. improvements to this intersection will be a
condition of approval. (per Traffic) Plans for this improvemem will need to be provided and approved prior to
final approval of this project if they have not already been received and approved. 2/5/03 The revision to Spring
Creek Center have been approved. The improvements to this intersection will need to be done before a
Certificate of Occcupancy can be obtained by any building in Spring Creek Center or Centerpoint Plaza.
Page I
Topic: Utility plans
Number: 102 Created: 5/14/2002
All work within the Platte River Power Authority non -buildable easement needs to be approved by Platte River power
Authority. They will need to sign the plans showing they approve of the work and improvements shown within their
easement.
Number: 140 Created: 1 /29/2003
Add the truncated dome details to the plans. Choose the detail you want to add either the CDOT details or the Greeley
details. These will be used until we develop our own.
Number: 141 Created: 1/29/2003
If the off site sewer in Spring Creek Center that this site is tieing into is not completely in the design for the portion that
is not in place needs to be a part of these drawings
Number: 142 Created: 1 /29/2003
Need to provide easements on the plat for the detention to be built with Building A and for the existing services to Lot 3.
Number: 143 Created: 1 /29/2003
Fill out and return the Development Agreement information sheet
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Plat
Number: 136 Created: 1 /17/2003
A 6 ft. utility easement is required along both sides of the lot lines between lots 1 & 2, and lots 1 & 3. Also, there is an
existing electric transformer adjacent to the west side of the existing building on lot 3. An 8 ft. utility easement centered
on this transformer (and encopmassing the transformer) is required extending to the west property line of lot #3.
Department: Natural Resources
Topic: General
Number: 144
No issues.
Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Created: 1 /30/2003
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Harridan
Topic: Drainage Report
Number: 147 Created: 1 /31 /2003
Please note that the original drainage report for the entire site has not been approved. The text of that reeport which is
included with this Phase 1 submittal contains numerous references to elections that should be removed.
Topic: Erosion and Sediment Control
Number: 146 Created: 1 /31 /2003
Fifth Review
January 28, 2003
CITY OF FORT COLLINS' standard erosion control notes must be on the plan, not Larimer county urban street
standard notes.
Topic: Off -site Easements
Number: 148 Created: 1 /31 /2003
Please document that the off -site irrrigation lateral that is being used to carry flows from this site is within a pre-existing
drainage easment or provide such an easement.
Topic: Off -site flows
Number: 151
Created: 1 /31 /2003
Page 2
and structures are not allowed over easements.
41
Site Plan
Will need an off -site easement for the driveway construction at the northeast corner of the site.
42
Site Plan
The sidewalk along midpoint needs to be placed so that the back of the walk is along the new row
line.
43
Site Plan
Is the rail spur new or existing?
44
Landscape plan
The trees and landscaping along Timberline road need to be planted so that they are not where the
future walk is to be located or beyond where the potential future curb line will be based on the major
arterial design and the row location.
45
Landscape plan
By combining walks you will have more room for the landscape shown.
46
Plat
Show the off -site easements that are needed. Indicate that they are to be provided by separate
document.
47
Plat
Need to provide access easements for the drive isles across lot 2 as it is the only access for the other
two lots.
48
Plat
Is an easement needed for the sewer line that runs into the site?
49
Plat
Modify the certificate of dedication to meet current language.
50
Plat
Delete one word in the maintenance guarantee language as shown
51
Utility plans
Provide 2 benchmarks and info.
52
Utility plans
Provide Indemnification statement per 3.3.1.F
Page 2
Please doiscuss in your Phase 1 report how off -site flows coming off of Timberline are being handled by this site
Topic: Outlet Structure and spillway
Number: 149 Created: 1 /31 /2003
Please provide a construction level detail of the water quality outlet structure including steel reinforcement. Also
provide a spillway detail with all appropriate elevations and dimensions.
Topic: Storm Sewer Profile
Number: 150 Created: 1 /31 /2003
Please provide a profile for the proposed 15" ADS pipe on the site.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: Plat
Number: 137 Created: 1/28/2003
Provide a 10 foot wide utility easement (centered on the existing water service) across lot 2 for the existing water
service which extends to lot 3. Define the easements for the curb stops as utility easements. Provide a utility
easement for the required fire hydrant at the end of the proposed water main.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Utility plans
Number: 145 Created: 1 /31 /2003
An acceptance has not yet been received for the sewer in Spring Creek Center; therefore, check to determine if the
sewer is existing or if planned for future phases.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: Utility plans
Number: 138 Created: 1 /28/2003
No water services are permitted beyond the last fire hydrant. Provide a benched area along the detention pond for the
proposed curb stop and meter pit.
Number: 139 Created: 1 /28/2003
Provide an in -line valve just past the required fire hydrant to facilitate future extension of the water main.
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Yo s Truly,
S eve Olt
City Planner
Page 3
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
t itvni Fort Crltins
Department: Engineering
Date: February 5, 2003
Project:
CENTERPOINT PLAZA PDP & FINAL COMPLIANCE - TYPE I (LUC), #35-
01/A
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
January 29, 2003
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: General
Number: 41 Created: 10/2/2001
Will need an off -site easement for the driveway construction at the northeast corner of the
site.
This easement will need to be provided with the final compliance submittal. If for some
reason the easement can not be obtained, the plan can not be approved as shown and the
layout may have to change to accommodate access requirement. 2/5/03 not yet provided
still needed.
Number: 74 Created: 10/5/2001
As was previously discussed this development can provide the city with a cash escrow for
the design and construction of the local street portion of the improvements to Timberline
Road adjacent to the site in lieu of doing this work at this time. 1 /29/03 This cash In lieu of
doing the design and improvements shall include the sidewalk along Timberline Road and
the street trees along Timberline. The sidewalk along Timberline is not needed as a
connection to a public walk for Building A, therefore this sidewalk should not be shown on
the utility plans or the site plans.
Number: 75 Created: 10/5/2001
This development needs to work with the developers of Spring Creek Center in
accomplishing the improvements that are needed at the midpoint timberline intersection to
accommodate truck traffic at this intersection. Improvements to this intersection will be a
condition of approval. (per Traffic) Plans for this improvement will need to be provided and
approved prior to final approval of this project if they have not already been received and
approved. 2/5/03 The revision to Spring Creek Center have been approved. The
improvements to this intersection will need to be done before a Certificate of Occupancy can
be obtained by any building in Spring Creek Center or Centerpoint Plaza.
,*,,nature
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH "rO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat <- Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Pa,,e I
Topic: Utility plans Created: 5/14/2002
Number: 102
All work within the Platte River Power Authority non -buildable easement needs to be
approved by Platte River power Authority. They will need to sign the plans showing they
approve of the work and improvements shown within their easement.
Number: 140 Created: 1 /29/2003
Add the truncated dome details to the plans. Choose the detail you want to add either the
CDOT details or the Greeley details. These will be used until we develop our own.
Number: 141 Created: 1 /29/2003
If the off site sewer in Spring Creek Center that this site is tying into is not completely in the
design for the portion that is not in place needs to be a part of these drawings
Number: 142 Created: 1 /29/2003
Need to provide easements on the plat for the detention to be built with Building A and for
the existing services to Lot 3.
Number: 143 Created: 1 /29/2003
Fill out and return the Development Agreement information sheet
Page 2
STEWART&ASSOCIATES
Consulting Engineers and Surveyors
REPLY TO PROJECT COMMENTS SHEET
FOR
PHASE 1, CENTERPOINT PLAZA
Engineering dated 2-5-03
No. 41 Owner is obtaining easement from County
No. 74 Sidewalk along Timberline Road has been removed
No. 75 Per our conversation this plan has now been approved by you. I added a note to sheet
3 of our plans that this work needed to be completed prior to a C.O. for our project.
No. 102 Platte River Power Authority has signed sheet No. 4 of the Utility Plans, which shows
all work being done in their easement.
No. 140 Added truncated dome details to Sheet No. 7
No. 141 Construction details have been added to connect the not completed sewer
No. 142 All easements for Phase I detention and drainage were provided and are on the
subdivision plat. Also added easement over Lot 2 to Lot 3 for the existing gas and water services
to subdivision plat.
No 143 Gave information sheet to owner to fill out.
Jack Blake
Stewart & Associates, Inc.
February 14, 2003
James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc.
I NI ;xrInN, vi. zn „r sz „I,Q Z Meldrum Street • P.O. Box 429 • Ft. Collins, CO 80522
970/482-9331 • Fax 970/482-9382
Project Comments Sheet
�'"' Selected Departments
City of Fort Collins
Date: February 2, 2005
Project:
CENTERPOINT PLAZA BUILDING A MAJOR AMENDMENT -TYPE I
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
February 02, 2005
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: General
Number: 7 Created: 2/2/2005
[2/2/05] No footings or overhangs (eaves) can extend into the easements. This appears to
be occurring on the north side and west side of the building. We can also look into an
easement vacation along Timberline if you would like for the area where the building
overhang is proposed.
Number: a Created: 2/2/2005
[2/2/05] Need to show the easements - drainage etc. on these plans. Need to be able to
verify that the larger building does not extend into the easements.
Number: 9 Created: 2/2/2005
[2/2/05] The building is extending beyond the shown building envelope. The building
envelope was not shown on the plat, so just revise the building envelope to go out side of
the structure. Just be aware that the building envelope can not extend into the easements.
Number: 10 Created: 2/2/2005
[2/2/05] Now appear to be showing retaining walls at the south end of the building. If you
are we need to see if and how this impacts the grading plans and the temporary pond.
Signature
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat � Site Drainage Report Other ;1, v
Lam_ Utility Redline Utility 0<_ Landscape
Page 1
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
City of Fort Collins
Date: March 10, 2005
Project:
CENTERPOINT PLAZA BUILDING A MAJOR AMENDMENT -TYPE I
All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the
staff review meeting:
March 09.2005
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: General
Number: 17 Created: 2/2812005
[2/28/051 No Comments - all issues have been resolved.
Number: 18 Created: 3/10/2005
[3/10/05] If the spot elevations shown on the grading plan for the parking lot and islands
change due to the parking lot changes a revised grading plan needs to be submitted for
review and approval. This can be done concurrently with the hearing process.
:�3/� I
Signature
Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
xvz
DATE: August 11, 2005 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: Centerpoint Plaza
ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff
All comments must be received by: August 29, 2005
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concems (see below or attached)
Comments:
Need to coordinate with the Timberline Project being coordinated by City Street
Oversizing. Eileen Bayens would be your contact; she can be reached at 221-6605.
This pipe impacts the drainage design that was approved for Timberline Road so you will
need to work with them to determine where, how, and when inlets will need to be
installed and who is responsible for them.
Not sure who's plan set is correct, but the. waterline and fire hydrant along Timberline
Road seem to differ slightly between the two plans. When I scale out and place the
stormline on the Timberline set of plans the line appears to run directly under the fire
hydrant.
Date: 31 /C S Signature: S , LC 6""a �
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
0 Plat 13 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MyLARS
SION
SHEET
DATE: August 11, 2005 DEPT: Watertwastewater
PROJECT: Centerpoint Plaza
ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff
All comments must be received by: August 29, 2005
❑ No Problems
11313roblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Comments:
P,tOV , 04 s r,g..p RR � T • F G?Avl rY
IDt?!4lL i. Ca N CRb:a^^J-
&xPf, O iNE.f -r}.�tS
to rZ /N 0R0�,e
PIE!OV DE r-arjc?_c �
@
/3c0r,k
1�'c T9ii
?J AvloZ> LfIHTE,@ M�9.nl
Date: Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
13 Plat 0Site ❑Utility ❑Landscape 0 Drainage J eport 13 NO COMMENTS_SUBMTr MYLARS
53
Utility plans
Provide construction Notes as applicable
54
Utility plans
Show location and label future walk along Timberline Rd
55
Utility plans
Where is the pavement edge behind the existing warehouse? The pavement line stops at the end of
the parking stalls or, the east side of the center drive isle running south.
56
Utility plans
Identify that the sidewalks in front of the parking stalls are 6-foot min.
57
Utility plans
Need to show the patching in the street that will occur with the installation of the driveway cuts as well
as the utility cuts. Add a note that the street is to be repaired/ replaced in accordance with City
standards.
58
Utility plans
Identify the driveway widths and the radii used for the access points. R=15 feet from table 8-2.
59
Utility plans
The sidewalk on midpoint needs to be placed so that the back of walk abuts the new row edge
60
Utility plans
Is there an easement needed or existing for the rail spur?
61
Utility plans
Will need off -site easements for the sewer connection within the railroad property and for the
driveway access point that partially falls outside the property boundary.
62
Utility plans
Provide elevations at the driveways. Drainage can not go across the sidewalk (out the driveway)
Need more information on the plans to verify that this is not occurring.
63
Utility plans
Make sure details are readable.
64
Utility plans
With the standard driveway detail identify that t=6 inches min.
65
Utility plans
Use new curb and gutter details.
Page 3
66
Utility plans
Provide details 7-20A (vert curb), 16-1 (standard sidewalk), 16-2 (sidewalk detail), 16-41D (ped ramp)
and 22-1 (trench detail)
67
Utility plans
See plans for additional comments
74
As was previously discussed this development can provide the city with a cash escrow for the design
and construction of the local street portion of the improvements to Timberline Road adjacent to the
site in lieu of doing this work at this time.
75
This development needs to work with the developers of Spring Creek Center in accomplishing the
improvements that are needed at the midpoint timberline intersection to accommodate truck traffic at
this intersection.
76
Need to show the phasing on the utility plans and need to identify/ show the phase lines on the site
and landscape plans. Need to know what utilities, pavement and improvements are to be built with
each phase if the project is to be phased.
Page 4
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: April t 1, 2002 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #35-01 Centerpoint Plaza PDP —Type I (LUC)
All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff
review meeting:
May 8, 2002
ElNo Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
C-)< �7, cq�k�
Date:
CIII CK HERB IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
ignature:
Other
Project Comments Sheet
Loh.Selected Departments
City of Pori Collins
Department: Engineering
Date: May 14, 2002
Project: CENTERPOINT PLAZA PDP, TYPE I (LUC), #35-01
All comments must be received by STEVE OLT in Current Planning no later than the
staff review meeting:
May 08, 2002
Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference
Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
32
An adequate public facilities (APF) analysis needs to be done for this project as was identified
on Attachment 'A' Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions of the TIS. It appears that
there will be APF issues on this project. This is needed before the project can consider going
forward. 5/7/02 This was done for Building A construction or Building B construction. These
studies need the highway capacity sheets provided in order to adequately evaluate the studies.
74
As was previously discussed this development can provide the city with a cash escrow for the
design and construction of the local street portion of the improvements to Timberline Road
adjacent to the site in lieu of doing this work at this time.
75
This development needs to work with the developers of Spring Creek Center in accomplishing
the improvements that are needed at the midpoint timberline intersection to accommodate truck
traffic at this intersection. Improvements to this intersection will be a condition of approval.
(per Traffic)
Topic: General
106
Once this project has gone to hearing (assuming one building and only one building can be
built) the Final Plan submittal will need to only show the work and infrastructure for the one
building to be built. All extra stuff and other building sites and services will need to be taken off
of the plans. Can only put in the infrastructure for the one building.
Topic: Landscape Plan
44
The trees and landscaping along Timberline road need to be planted so that they are not where
CionnJnrn / Date
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
h Plat %<" Site Drainage Report Other_
Utility '>( Redline Utility Landscape
Page 1
the future walk is to be located or beyond where the potential future curb line will be based on
the major arterial design and the row location.
81
There is no phasing shown on this plan
Topic: Plat
46
Show the off -site easement that are needed. Indicate that they are to be provided by separate
document.
103
The access easement on Lot 2 needs to extend to the eastern property line to provide for
potential future shared access.
104
The railroad spur easement - who is this dedicated to? Is it being dedicated to the City as a
public easement?
Topic: Site Plan
35
Show the future 7-foot sidewalk along Timberline Road. It would be best to not have dual
walks along here. Widen out the 5-foot walk on site to meet the 7-foot standard or build and
use the 7-foot walk to meet the connection needs you are showing. 5/7/02 Need to show the
sidewalk as being built - it will be needed to connect to building B if that is the building to be
built. Will need a sidewalk connection that does not cross a drive isle.
41
Will need an off -site easement for the driveway construction at the northeast corner of the site
79
The phasing numbering differs on the utility plans
80
Phase line locations differ from the utility plans
105
Need a note on the plan indicating future potential shared access with the property to the east
along the eastern property line of lot 2.
Topic: Utility plans
54
Show location and label future walk along Timberline Rd.
59
The sidewalk on midpoint needs to be placed so that the back of walk abuts the new row edge.
5/7/02 not correct on all sheets
61
Will need off -site easements for the
driveway access point that partially falls outside the property boundary.
Page 2
63
Make sure details are readable.
67
See plans for additional comments.
82
The phasing differs from the site plan
83
Place a type III barricade at the end of the walk on Timberline with Phase 1
Show a type III barricade being placed at the end of the walk on Timberline with Phase 2
84
The sidewalk on Timberline will be needed for the construction of Building B (Phase 2 - Utility
plans)
85
Label the buildings on the Utility plans (ie building A, building B, Building C)
86
Locate the driveways - provide dimensions from the property line.
87
The width of the center access drive is shown differently on the site and utility plans
88
The grading plan does not show the sidewalk on Timberline or Midpoint in the correct location.
102
All work within the Platte River Power Authority non -buildable easement needs to be approved
by Platte River power Authority. They will need to sign the plans showing they approve of the
work and improvements shown within their easement.
J
C t 0�
��C,a i <J
Page 3