Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFAIRBROOKE HEIGHTS PUD - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2003-10-29CITY OF FORT COLLINS P.O. BOX 580, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522 PH (303) 484-4220 PLANNING DIVISION EXT. 655 April 2, 1981 Mr. John Dengler Gefroh Associates, Inc. One Drake Park, Suite 23 333 West Drake Road Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear John: At our meeting on April 2, 1981 concerning the Aspen Heights PUD, the following items were resolved: 1. The design of the relocation of the irrigation canal as shown on the attached sketch plan appears to be workable. Engineering details will be worked out at final stage. 2. Preliminary approval by the irrigation canal company will be required prior to preliminary approval by the City. 3. Bike/pedestrian bridge and path relocation will be at expense of owner. Should you have any comments or questions regarding this item, please feel free to contact me. incerely, Joe rank Se �or Planner JF/fsr Attachment cc: Curt Smith Josh Richardson Mr. Don Parsons From: Steve Ryder May 13, 1985 Page Two If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, vVQ4P lqa�r Steve Ryder City Planner CC: Sam Mutch, Planning Director Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator November 21. 1994 Planning and Zoning Board Members C/O Mike Ludwig Planning Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Planning Objectives for Fairbrooke Heights Preliminary P.U.D. Submittal LUPUY 4 soanres l a ndscapc Architecture l'rban Deign Planning "_ i leDirect Rat( dhn..(niundo hlli', PI IO,CL 1 0 � 1 ", ;h_'h FAX N)22+210% Fairbrooke Heights PUD is a residential development including 51 single family lots and 30 multi -family dwelling units. The site is located south of Prospect Road approximately one-half mile east of Taft Hill Road, situated south) of the recently approved Fairbrooke Tract A. This site was not part of the Fairbrooke Overall Development Plan, however, in 1982 a multi -family project, known as Aspen Heights PUD, was approved for this site. That plan proposed 152 dwelling units in 22 4-plex buildings and 8 8-plex buildings. The site slopes from the northwest to the southeast. The Pleasant Valley and Lake Canal borders the site on the east and the south. Open space owned by the City's Stormwater Utility is located across the canal to the south and east.. Stadium Heights, a multi -family project comprised of 4-plex units is located to the west and Fairbrooke Tract A (70 single family lots) is planned for the property to the north. The site scores 60 points on the LAND DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE SYSTEM Housing Density Chart, gaining points for being close to a Neighborhood Park (Blevins Park), being close to an existing school (Bauder Elementary), and for being contiguous to existing urban development. Fairbrooke Heights PUD proposes a residential density of 5.8 dwelling units per acre. Existing drainage patterns, solar orientation and the connection of Somerville Drive through the site were the most significant factors affecting the design of the project. The proposed plan has 35 or 68% solar oriented lots. Planning objectives for the property include: Bring together existing neighborhoods by creating a gradual land use transition from multi -family to single family. This is accomplished by locating higher density, single family attached and/or patio homes and multi -family units west of Somerville Drive adjacent to existing multi -family projects. Larger single family lots are located east of Somerville Drive and are buffered from existing single family by the Pleasant Valley and Lake Canal. Provide a diversity of housing types in order to meet a variety of community housing needs. Minimize the environmental impact of the development by responding to existing drainage patterns. RIPLEY ASSOCIATES Planning Objectives - Fairbrooke Heights PUD November 21, 1994 Page 2 City land use policies that support the proposed development include 22. Preferential consideration shall be given to urban development proposals which are contiguous to existing development within the city limits or consistent with the phasing plan for the City's urban growth area 75. Residential areas should provide for a mix of housing types. 78. Residential development should be directed into areas which reinforce the phasing plan in the urban growth area. 79. Residential areas should locate within walking distance of an elementary school (Bauder Elementary) and neighborhood parks (Blevins Park). 82. Higher density residential uses should locate in planned unit developments or in close proximity to existing higher density areas. We believe that Fairbrooke Heights PUD is a well -planned residential development that promises to be an attractive addition to the neighborhood and community. Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to working with you during the development review process. Sincerely, RIPLEY ASSOCIATES 6*�L Linda Ripley Principal From: Link Mueller To: FCI.ENG NET.WSTANFORD Date: 4/17/96 12:41pm Subject: Fairbrooke Heights Ward, I found the verbiage I believe is applicable in this case. It's the one that was used in Stetson Creek, First Filing. This paragraph should be included in the Storm Drainage section: "The Developer and the City agree that the Developer shall construct regional storm drainage improvements along the Pleasant Valley & Lake Canal. It is agreed that in order for the Developer to be entitled to reimbursement for the City for any expenses incurred in constructing said improvements, Exhibit "B" describing the improvements and showing the cost thereof, must be completed by amendment to this Agreement prior to the commencement of any construction (excluding grading) of said improvements by the Developer." Let me know if you have any questions Link CC: Basil Hamdan, Glen Schlueter L k�, T J _11V ����t SaM! UNF�SIPJ�.�r� Q>!J f�Y l'� CT TLC -ARC Aa j,)OTF- C)vJ 7F4F, :;4-,4T, To f'AYE 77) TfA7 GLEr J �Y�LU�� E2 AsK� = My Sctr�r/ 4��2 To Ncc ZYOU! Ly ,J6P-Z� 34CA� E GUAS IJO-r 77) V`/�//1 T' ��J1 ;J��4..i ��C. /_/.'. �`r1 ��/1�� 'n� I [`�� �^'�1!'7' � (•:'N. — S (� 0 OU E2 TLu o ACRES of= LAM:) O /Ti-l0 UT f1N y avR17T1J T/-14T 1�6, Cr'Y Zv/L - pqy /•-te roe LPvJ WAS M CA)74S A&O wr�N D 7o CLb�S �N T� LAND H�)A)7,� 460 SMF� 7/OJK 130717-�- 7ff 75AA-(S Or- 7lYc Li4n-,'D 7:Lzou£ta�M�caT/K��rrt��T, I Z c 0 Lp/ k As�sSfBl ? #4uSPOK&'J_ 7-0 C-iLStv SCtfLUE7-cr-2�_4iND /5 T H- LIFST 10AY 17� hAVD L F, TPC S i TU fi-7 n v AIV TAT ; -1�E CITY WILL- FAY I-Q, Foy -7ffE 4 �� .-Z- wouL� Li K� 7 o Frco-, e>. AL-wAy-c- fin✓ Y7t�r, J� `�'©�L CAnJ proccSS 6jlLL 3E 4t�r�2�cia- D. Dave Stringer - Fairbrooke Heights Page 1 From: To: Date: Subject: Troy Jones Dave Stringer Mon, May 1, 2000 2:33 PM Fairbrooke Heights Dave, In my comment letter, I mentioned they might want to rezone to LMN, but I got to thinking that that zoning district might not work for what they want to do either. LMN does not allow more than 6 units to a building and also limits the density to 8 du/gross acre. It's not clear what the acrage is on the multifamily piece, but unless it is 4.5 acres or larger, they can't have 36 units. If they proceed with a rezone, they would need to propose a structure plan amendment to allow the site to be Medium -Density, then they would have to propose a rezone to MMN. Sorry for the delay on the information, but it didn't occur to me right away. Troy 216W51$'St Loveland, Co. 80538 May 22, 2000 Dave Stringer Engineering Department City of Ft Collins Per discussions on the 17t' among you, Paul Eckman, Lucia Liley, and me, I hereby request the two 6 month extensions to complete public infrastructure under the provisions of the Fairbrooke Heights PUD Development Agreement Amendment #2. 1 know from another subsequent telephone conversation that you appreciate that time is of the essence and trust you will expedite the City's processes related to the accompanying Development Construction Permit Application If you will recall, you indicated that no Construction Coordination Meeting will be necessary I have contracted with Connell Resources to complete the remaining public infrastructure They are scheduled to begin work June 1 (or earlier) with a completion date no later than June 20. Please contact me if you have any questions or any other unforeseen issues arise I have canceled plans that would have taken me out of town, so I can be reached at 669-6995 (home) or 310-9516 (cell) until June 1_ My work number after May 31 is 679-3416. Bob Kidd is currently coordinating this project for Connell (223-3151). Thank you Eric Booton (� C6C, ') �-L�' Hand Delivered May 23, 2000 Cc: Lucia Liley Paul Eckman Bob Kidd, Connell Resources Community Planning and Environmental Services Current Planning City of Fort Collins May 25, 2000 Eric Booton 216 W. 515t Street Loveland, Co. 80538 RE: Fairbrooke Heights PUD Dear: Mr. Booton This is in response to your letter dated May 22, 2000, requesting an extension to the required vesting of development rights as specified in the City's Land Use Code. As per the Development Agreement, Amendment Number 2, for the Fairbrooke Heights P.U.D., the City agreed to granting two six months extensions to this requirernent based upon unresolved issues with the City Stormwater Utility. After staffs review and consideration of the constraints as stated, it has been determined that a time extension is warranted. Therefore, it is staffs opinion that two six month extensions will provide adequate time for your construction team to complete the installation and obtain City approval for the remaining water and sewer main lines. Based upon this extension the revised time line for you to complete this work shall be June 25,2000. Therefore, if the construction of the water and sewer mainlines are not complete and accepted by the City, at the end of the day on June 25, 2000, this project will automatically lapse and become null and void. Should you have any questions regarding this extension, please contact me at 221-6765. Sincerely, -�S� � David Stringer Interim Planning Director Cc: Lucia Liley, March & Liley Lance Newlin, Chief Construction Inspector Bob Kidd, Connell Resources File '7 I vnrth (ollcgc A%cnue • PO. Box 380 • Fort Collin:, CO • (070) 2Lb75o • FAX (970) 4Iir3070 wk�:A'F-ZNr "tIGA�T':-- ; BROWN FARM nth. FILING (OZOLF OF Pn*�oSE:c> IMPPOVEt'1ErV7S -Fo PCB ASAn r VA, I =y ,QNL> LAIE EXHIBIT No. 2 CAvAL TU BE ceDEst6mE-D 7-0 DESIGN FLOW BSOLF+ AS 6loh/N -CHANGE IE,eZATloNY CltKIA_ APE>`> 1 � .0004- To .6O08 CNAn/Gc STo eN1 N/4TE2 GAuAL BASIN 12 '6uos To .�!OI STB 1A h >o'w AREA- 0.23 >`.p ACRES I v CONCRETE LINED DRAIN) I—BASI it �\ BASIN II COURT AREA94pACRES ) / «CAI 5/os.8o o C" A SlD% SO s + IMPk=o1/EMf��ITS r' -S- r aL JLlZr7 To DETENTION CO CP T LINED SEE AND WE: D In SwPLE (SEE EinmlT BPO \0 ACAEsyful LTne DRAINAGE r _i__ =Q jA•S^PE1�N6£-E\/. A=trtO// yD CAPACITT'6yTE]O C. (SEE EXHIBIT N0. 41 -r 21' AT U39 % TRACT Y DETENTION P - t� 9 CAPACITY C. ACRE FEET CF. OUTLET . ID S. L B •o9 1 �f 1 / B,asY?Y J .iIDB DD Gf S. y D�: O. Cf5/ /� ,40 0/ a3'S(OP Y''O Pii _ L' D B O/' 9 CON CTE LINE DRAINAGE SwALE AT L)I>. Ems` A CJI f' �BD (, 4Cpf/ 1 ET iI.TANYI ins /5G+�Uf •�'>, ti - ,E v ;��t ��pcm GQAIAL- /Ad M Q h~ tr O j •'^ \i n �: �1 Id ::) .fONCRE NO ANGST > l2� GAn m` ' D, n / « n W yTRACT'B' DETENTION P CAPACITY-0.29 ACRE FEET N UPOUTLET I>;I�.F.& J w IGO� �� ' CCC, AppgA • Y 12'AT 0.30% MO L CANAL 4~ Ar°D— BASIN o 0 AREA�2I.BT �RE$ 'p��,.� '1 IY AT I� BA11 SI [1CARD RIPLE IS CAT N ISAS N _f STUART STREE* -r-,- r-- - CITY OF OR1 CO LINS I I I }ANOAR s' HA Er Pe Tr PICA I : SIN S E 627 EX I I Ell 7 YDRDA �CWRT i r e x�'' '� `I ".' F•. ,'7 ------------T ,. z 0 zz kk �- i �Illil W N ,l ppLL r� 2 IN a V Z J� Ii �L �I w u ui 110 II Iailv+I o' AAA W t I �dA -1s1- M N Fa- N 0 g� N J W J � Q Z Z Q Q U W � Y � Q � J Q O � Z Q U) L w w = J U J � z < Z Q w z Q O W Z J � a d o Z o_ F Z Z J W 2 p W w a a � 3 O � W 0 N o oa. N 0 0 a -- PARSONS & 9r� ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS April 1, 1982 City of Fort Collins 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Attn: Mike Herzig Dear Mike, This letter is to request a determination of the 18 kip equivalent daily load application for the proposed Aspen Heights P.U.D. project. The project is located in the NW ; of section, T7N, R69W in the city of Fort Collins bounded by the Stadium Heights development to the west and the Brown Farm fifth filing to the south. The existing Somerville Drive, a local, will be constructed through the site with both public and private streets accessing it. Once we have obtained this information from you, we will determine the structural street sections necessary for this project. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Robert L. Lenz, P.E. jF 1405 So. College Ave. - Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524. [303]221- JCR ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING r CONSTRUC-i ,ON MANAGEMENT JOSEPH C. ROESSER JR., P.E. / PHONE (303) 4B4-5463 April 2, 1981 Mauri Rupel Assistant City Engineer - Development P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, CO 80522 Re: Aspen Heights PUD, Preliminary Submittal Dear Mauri: This is to confirm that John Michie, president of the Pleasant Valley and Lake Canal Irrigation Company, has reviewed the preliminary redesign of the proposed improvements to the Pleasant Valley and Lake Canal (ref. Resource Consultants Volume II, July, 1980). The relocation shortens approximately 1820 l.f. of improvements to approximately 850 l.f., between stations 1384-00 and 156+20. Mr. Michie supports this relocation in concept as shown on the attached preliminary sketch. Official approval of the relocation of the canal improvements project in this area will be at the time review is made of the Final Utility Plans for the Aspen Heights project. Sincerely, C Joseph C. Roesser, Jr., P.E. JCR/mg I concur- with the above stated information. d fin Michie Ira e 211 West Myrtle / FORT COLLINS / COLORADO 60521 PARSONS & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS April 5, 1982 City of Fort Collins Engineering 300 La Porte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Bob: I am pleased to submit this information regarding the storm runoff condi- tions of the Aspen Heights P.U.D. project as being submitted. As you know, this site was once planned to be a portion of the Brown Farm 5th filing project. Because of that, adequate detention volume has been pro- vided for as part of the 5th filing in Tract "C" of that project. Please review this information which has been submitted.. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Robert L. Lenz, P. . 1405 So. College Ave. - Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524. • t3031221-2400 PARSONS & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS May 7, 1982 City of Fort Collins Engineering Department 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Attn: Mauri Rupel Dear Mauri, This letter is to request two variances to the City of Fort Collins requirements for the Aspen Heights P.U.D. project as submitted. The variances requested are: 1. Variance from providing on site detention. 2. Variance to the curb return radius at Glendale Drive and Prescott Street. On site detention will not be provided for this project. As described in the Storm Drainage report as submitted, this area was once a part of the Brown Farm 5th filing. The detention pond in Tract "C" of the 5th filing was designed to provide the required volume for the now, Aspen Heights P.U.D. Storm runoff will be routed to this Tract "C" detention pond via methods designed according to City specifications. A curb return radius of 18' from the Glendale Drive cul-de-sac to Prescott Street is proposed instead of the 20' minimum required by City specifications. This is the only location this occurs in this project and will provide a smooth transition from the cul-de-sac area to Prescott Street. I hope this provides the information you need to properly review this project. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Robert L. Lenz 1405 So. College Ave. • Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524. • [3031221-2400 CITY OF FORT COLLINS OFFICE OF PLANNING ANU DEVELOPMENT May 11, 1984 Mr. Don Parsons Parsons & Associates 432 Link Lane Plaza Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 RE: Aspen Heights P.U.D. - (Our #28-81A) Dear Don: Your request, on behalf of Mr. Fred Gushurst, to extend the final approval of Aspen Heights P.U.D. is hereby granted to November 24, 1984 on condition that Prescott Street and Glendale Street be brought to current street stan- dards of 36 feet wide travel width on 54 feet of right-of-way. In addition, since Mr. Gushurst has chosen not to have this P.U.D. recorded, it will be necessary to change the name of Prescott Street in this P.U.D. as another P.U.D. has been recorded in the interim which contains a Prescott Street. When you are in a position to redesign these streets, we will be happy to sit down with you to work them out. Yours�s very truly_ Maurice E. Rupel Development Center Director MER/kb CC: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator Dave Stringer, Chief Construction Inspector III i'l APiGpr P ;I 1 17F-VH C1IiMI fd I CITY OF F JRT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION May 13, 1985 Donald M. Parsons, P.E. Parsons & Associates 432 Link Lane Plaza Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 RE: Aspen Heights PUD - Final Plan (#28-81A) Dear Don: In response to your request for extension of the approval of the above referenced project, the following conclusions are made: 1. Aspen Heights PUD - Final was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on May 24, 1982. The approved plan was valid until May 24, 1984, 2. A six (6) month extension was granted by Mauri Rupel (letter of May 11, 1984) which extended the validity of the plan to November 24, 1984. The final plan expired on that date. 3. In December of 1984, a letter was sent to our office requesting a twelve (12) month extension of this plan. The Planning Office is only able to grant two successive six (6) month extensions administratively. As was mentioned before, the plan had expired prior to our receipt of this letter. 4. Staff is willing to allow an extension, subject to approval by the Planning and Zoning Board, with the following conditions: a. All revisions requested by Engineering Staff are addressed. b. Any new revisions requested by Planning Staff are addressed. c. A letter requesting the extension request to go before the Planning and Zoning Board for approval is submitted by May 24, 1985. d. The request would go before the Planning and Zoning Board at the earliest meeting after all revisions have been addressed. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY W 300 LaPorte Ave- • P.O- Box 580 • Fort Collins- Colorado 80522 • j303)221-6750 DEVELOPMENT. PLANNING DIVISION