Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOLLINDALE PUD EIGHTY FIVE - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2003-07-31CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY COLLINDALE PUD '85 On Wednesday, January 29, 1986, from 7-8PM, in the Col lindale Golf Course Clubhouse, a neighborhood meeting -was held on the proposed Coll indale '85 PUD. Approximately 19 neighbors attended. Elaine Kleckner, City Planner, started the meeting with a short video tape on the planning process and Bill Brenner of Robb and Brenner Architects presented the site plan for the developer, William Bartran. Mr. Bartran explained the development concept and answered questions. The meeting closed with Ms. Kleckner summarizing neighborhood concerns. The groups questions and concerns can he summarized as follows: 1. Storm Drainage: This was an important topic to the group. They questioned how the proposed storm drainage' facility will work and expressed a desire to see drainage looked at in a'romprehensive manner, since they perceived problems with other development in the area. Development east of the railroad tracks is poorly drained and affects their property, according to several individuals. They also pointed out that existing discharge pipes were poorly maintained. The group questioned responsibility for maintenance for the proposed detention area. 2. Traffic Impacts: Another very significant issue was the proposed access plan. Residents were concerned that the City's desire to limit access on Horsetooth Road created safety problems for children and pedestrians on the local streets. They also anticipated more traffic filtering south from Nelson Farm to reach Horsetooth Road. Residents feared an even greater disturbance to their neighborhood when the property to the west of this site develops. They inquired if speed bumps and stop signs could be installed on the local streets. 3. Improving Horsetooth Road: The group expressed the desire to see Horsetoothh Road improved to its full width. 4. Access to Amenities: After hearing that tenants of the new PUD would Of f KA COMMUNITY joe _jaPortj� A.t- B( . Yj4, fc!t C(-Un�;, G,)Iuraijo 221 6750 DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION 22. The drainage easement between structures cannot be considered active open space because it is less than 50' wide (see page 11808 of the Zoning Code). The detention pond may be considered active open space (with the 50' guideline in mind) but the area of the side slopes must be deducted. I suggest not taking bonus credit for open space on the density chart - take credit for the approved Neighborhood Service center to the east (Greenfield Village Master Plan) instead. Your land use data should be revised however, to reflect the corrected active open space 'Figure. 21. Provide a brief description of how this project handles noise impacts from the adjacent railroad. I've attached a study that was done for a development east of Collindale PUD '85 and this should provide the data you need. 22. Elevations of each building type should be provided at the Final PUD stage. The Preliminary site plan should note where the stepping down from 2 1/2 to 2 stories occurs. Additional landscape screening should be provided south of these larger buildings to mitigate visual impacts from Horsetooth Road. Is Building 9 the only 2 1/2 story structure that does not step down? 23. A few weeks ago we discussed the need to verify the accuracy of the A.P.O. list„ We need the updated list as soon as possible. I suggest we discuss meet to discuss these comments at your convenience. Sincerely, Elaine Kleckner Planner cc: Alan Canter• Joe Frank Bonnie Tripoli UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY C O DURHAM R. F. NIEHAUS DIRECTOR -REAL ESTATE ti k. ASST. DIRECTOR -REAL ESTATE D. D BROWN EASTERN DISTRICT WESTERN DISTRICT DIRECTOR -SYSTEM PROJECTS D H LIGHTWINE M A PASSO AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT REAL ESTATE DIRECTOR DISTRICT REAL ESTATE DIRECTOR R. D RICE R. J. ZADINA D. R. RECHTENBACH MANAGER -SYSTEM PROJECTS T. J. STENSTROM W. T. GALLO L L DOLL M S SCHULTE D R LEWIS MANAGER- ESTATE ENGINEERING F L. WHITE REAL ESTATE AGENTS R W CHRISTENSTENSEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS REAL ESTATE AGENT G. B COLLINS 1416 DODGE STREET MANAGER -TITLES & CONVEYANCES OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68179 March 12, 1986 7 City of Fort Collins Community Development Department Ni�� �% `� Planning and Zoning Board 300 LaPorte Avenue p+yANN1K�* P. 0. Box 580 DF TMF Fort Collins, CO 80522 Gentlemen: NORTHWESTERN DISTRICT A.0 MEYER DISTRICT REAL ESTATE DIRECTOR F. B. SHARAR P G.FARRELL W L. LOFFER J. E. MATZA REAL ESTATE AGENTS Union Pacific has reviewed the correspondence forwarded with your memorandum of February 6 concerning Item No. 23 titled 11-86 Collindale 85PUD-Preliminary relative to planned residential adjacent to Railroad right of way there in Fort Collins, Colorado. Our Engineering Department has the following comments regarding the proposed PUD: 1). Security fencing should be required on the property line between the Railroad and the PUD due to the residential nature of the development. Landscaping and berms only as suggested on Sheet FS-I will not provide the proper security. 2). The Railroad will require more information on the improvements to the Horsetooth Road crossing due to the added volume and makeup of the traffic produced by this PUD. 3). The Railroad will require riprap at the end of the culvert, shown on Sheet PS-3 located due east of Collindale Drive, which will drain into the development outflow channel. This is needed to reduce erosion to the berm separating the outflow channel from the Rail- road right of way ditch. After- you have reviewed the Railroad's request, I would appreciate a response from you on the above items. Very truly yours, CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLANNING DIVISION March 25, 1986 Mr. Bill Brenner Mr. Gordon Hughes Robb and Brenner, Inc. Savings Building, 125 South Oak P.O. Box 251 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Gentlemen: As you know, the Collindale '85 Preliminary PUD was approved by the Plan- ning and Zoning Board on March 24, 1985. Approval was subject to address- ing the following concerns before Final PUD approval: 1. Options for redesign of the parking spaces adjacent to Horsetooth Road should be explored. 2. Quantities of plant material should be increased as described in the Staff report. 3. Staff and the applicant should look into realigning the southerly access to the site. Although not a condition of approval, the Board asked that information on NCR's operation with respect to hazardous material transport, storage and use be provided at Final review and that we examine potential impacts to the Collindale development. Other items to be addressed are as follows. Revisions reflecting these comments are due by noon on April 9, 1986. Colored plans and reductions should be provided by April 18th and all signed documents are due on April 24th at noon. 1. We received the attached letter from Union Pacific outlining their concerns. I suggest contacting them directly on these items. 2. Please update me on detention pond design options. Also, recent comments from Tom Gathman indicate that some revisions to the cal- culations in the storm drainage report are in order. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY 300 LaPorte Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins. Colorado 80522 (303) 221-6750 DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION 3. The Fire Department is still concerned about parked cars blocking access in front of Buildings 4, 9, 7 and 14. They also suggest moving the northerly garage for Building 4 to improve site dis- tance. I will meet with them and if necessary, have their repre- sentative at our Friday meeting. 4. Note on the Site Plan where "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" signs will be located. They must be provided on both sides of the drive. 5. Trees should not be planted in close proximity to the sewer line behind the northernmost duplex. 6. The Final Plat should show building envelopes or Tract A drainage, access, and utility easements. The owners name should be on the plat. 7. Plans should note that curb cuts will be concrete to the property line. 8. As you know, improvements to Carlton and Horsetooth must be done with this project. The Engineering Department needs plans for the portion of Horsetooth to be constructed with this project. 9. A repay is due on the water line in Horsetooth Road. 10. The numbers of the fee simple lots should be the same on the plat and site plan. Thanks for your cooperation on the Preliminary PUD. I'll see you this Fri- day at 9 AM to talk about the Final. Sincerely, Elaine eckner Planner cc: Joe Frank Bonnie Tripoli UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY C 0 DURHAM R F NIEHAU ESTATE ASST DISTRICT WESTERN GHTW'INE M A PASSO CT REA'_ ESTATE DIRECTOR DISTRICT REAL ADINA D R RECHTENBAC ENSTROPA VJ T GALLO CHULTE D R LEWIS 'MITE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ESTATE AGENTS 1416 DODGE STREET OP.IAHA. NEBRASKA 68179 March 12, 1986 S DIRECTOR-REALC7 L ESTATE D D BROWN EASTERNT NORTHWESTERN DISTRICT DiRECTOR-SYSTEM D H LI A 0 MEYER UVETS AAO �'ROPERTV MANAGEMENT DiSl PI E DIRECTOR DISTRICT REAL ESTATE DIRECTOR R D RICE 1VANAGF, R-SfSTEM PROJECTS R J Z H F B SHARAR L L DO' T. J ST P. G. FARRELL _L !�A',AGER-REAL ESTATE ENGINEERING M S S W L LOFFER R ':: CHRISTENSEN P L VJ J. E- MATZA REAL REAL ESTATE AGENTS G E CO'_L INS ._ - GLES R CO .VEYA�%CEO �994 T,7 City of Fort Collins Community Development Department Planning and Zoning Board 300 LaPorte Avenue P . 0. Box 580 PLANNING Fort Collins, CO 80522 QF-PARTMENT Gentlemen: Union Pacific has reviewed the correspondence forwarded with your memorandum of February 6 concerning Item No. 23 titled 11-86 Collindale 85PUD-Preliminary relative to planned residential adjacent to Railroad right of wah there in Fort Collins, Colorado. Our Engineering Department has the following comments regarding the proposed PUD: 1). Security fencing should be required on the property line between the Railroad and the PUD due to the residential nature of the development. Landscaping and berms only as suggested on Sheet FS-1 will not provide the proper SEA 2). The Railroad will require more information on the improvements to the 11orsetooth Road crossing due to the added volume and makeup of the traffic produced by this PUD. 3). The Railroad will require riprap at the end of the culvert, shown on Sheet PS-3 located due east of Collindale Drive, which will drain into the development outflow channel. This is needed to reduce erosion to the berm separating the outflow channel from the Rail- road right of way ditch. After you have reviewed the Railroad's request, I would appreciate a response from you on the above items. Very truly yours, RECEIVEED F)v May 5, 1986 Mr. Tom Gathmann City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Utility Dept. 300 Laporte Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Mr. Gathmann: MAY 7 1986 PLANNING DEPART�,MENT Bartran Homes, Inc. hereby agrees as part of the Development Agree- ment for Collindale "85" PUD to install the 15" storm water pipe across Horsetooth Road at station 46 + 50 of the ARIX drawings dated 4-15-86 from its property to a point on the City of Fort Collins Golf Course in accordance with the approved City plans prepared by their consulting engineer,. Bartran Homes, Inc. also agrees to regrade the area between the existing Horsetooth Road and the fairway to establish positive drainage to the new storm sewer pipe. This area is anticipated to be the area shown in red on the attached aerial photograph. Also, attached is a copy of the ARIX plan showing the new location of this storm sewer. The exact location of the area to be regraded will be determined as construction progresses and will be coordinated with and approved by the Storm Drainage Utility Dept. and the Golf Course Superintendent. Sincerely, William D. Bartran, President Bartran Homes, Inc. cc: H.R. Phillips, City of Fort Collins Elaine Kleckner, -City of Fort Collins Marty W. Kosec, M $ I Donohue 1500 Quail Hollow Court • Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 • Ph. (303) 223-2200 CITY OF' FORT COLLINS STORM WATER UTILITY DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: See Distribution List FROM: Tom Gathmann, Civil Engineer II RE: Collindale 85 PUD and the Collindale Golf Course After due consideration of the relatively minor impact to the Collindale Golf Course and corrective measures proposed by Bartran Homes, Inc. the Parks Department has agreed to allow the construction outlined in the attached letter from Bill Bartran dated May 5th, to take place on the golf course. This decision was reached at a meeting on the morning of May 7th attended by H.R. Phillips, Jerry Brown, Pfeil Johnson, Bill Bartran, Martin Kosec and Tom Gathmann. Distribution List: H.R. Phillips Jerry Brown „Bonnie Tripol i Elaine Kleckner Bill Bartran Martin Kosec STORM 'WATFR UTILITY 300 LaPorte Ave • P O Box 580 * Fort Collins, Colorauo 80522 • (303) 221-6605 CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION May 13, 1986 Mr. Bill Bartran 1500 Quail Hollow Court Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Bill: The Collindale '85 Final PUD was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on April 28, 1986 with the following conditions: 1. The developer shall design the culvert under Horsetooth Road in a man- ner acceptable to the City, and obtain approval from the City to do the off -site improvements. 2. The Development Agreement shall be executed. The Board stated that these conditions must be addressed by May 28, 1986 or the Final PUD approval will no longer be valid. I have received the correspondence about the drainage and golf course improvements, indicating that everyone is in agreement on the culvert loca- tion and extent of earthwork. I have not seen the Development Agreement however, and this should be executed by May 28, 1986 to keep the Final PUD approval alive. Thank you again for your cooperation. Sincerely, E aine ecknner Planner cc: Joe Frank Bonnie Tripoli 11C CITY OF FORT COLLINS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — ENGINEERING October 29, 1966 Larry Kleine Bartran Homes, Inc. 15UU Quail Hollow Court Fort Collins,, Colorado 80525 Re: Collindale 65 P.U.U. Dear Larry, I am in receipt of your letter of October 24, 1986 and have studied the proposals for, the partial improvement of Horsetooth Road. The City of Fort Collins will participate in the cost of construction in accordance with the Street Oversizing Ordinance in the Code of the City of Fort Collins., As you are aware, the Street Oversizing Ordinance was revised in August of this year. The impetus for the revisions was the City's lack of funds to participate Jn street construction. Although the City does not have funds available at the present time, projections indicate that there will be sufficient monies available in January of 1967. The alternate that I chose is ALTERNATE II - 40' Roadway. There are several points in favor of this approach. 1) The cost/benefit analysis is much better for the 2nd alternate. 2) The width will allow for future traffic patterns, including a turn lane, or bike path. 3) This alternate does not include a bike lane that will be removed in the future. 4) This alternate provides a much larger roadway section, eliminating sharp transitions at Lochwood and at the railroad crossing, at a very minimal cost to the City. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — ENGINEERING 300 LaPo,te Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 221-6605 Larry Kleine October 29, 1'986 Page 2 One requirement that I will make is that your engineer discuss the intersection of Horsetooth and Lochwood with Mr. Rick Ensdorff of our office. This intersection may require a median on Horsetooth, east of Lochwood for 3UO feet. I have also discussed the construction closure of Horsetooth Road from Lochwood to the Union Pacific Railroad crossing with Mr. Dick Wartenbe of our Traffic Department. He has indicated his approval with traffic control requirements. Please contact him for approval of your traffic control plan. A notification in the local newspapers would be required of you prior to starting construction. As is standard policy, please contact the Construction Inspection Department at least 24 hours prior to construction. It is most important that you notify emergency services (Police, Fire, Transfort, Poudre R-1) prior to the road closure when the road closure takes place, and when it becomes open again for traffic. The Construction Inspector assigned may help you with this notification, but the responsibility to notify is yours. Obviously, the road closure should be as short a duration as possible. Once paving beyins and there is at least an asphalt base course installed, opening of the roadway (with appropriate traffic control) over the weekends is a suggestion. At any rate, 2 weeks to 2 112 weeks depending on the weather is the maximum time allowed for the closure. I appreciate your efforts in the timely installation of the improvements required for this development, and your cooperation and patience in working through the street oversizing issues. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 221-6605. Sincerely, Matt J. aker SID Coordinator be allowed use of the existing pool, an individual questioned where pedestrian access would be provided and when it would be phased in. 5. Miscellaneous Questions: Neighbors inquired about the building types (no. of units), unit sizes, selling prices, how the parking ratios were determined, and where construction would take place first on the site. One person asked which schools would serve the development. CITY OF FORT COLLINS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — ENGINEERING November 1U, 1986 Larry Kline Bartran Homes 1500 Quail Hollow Court Fort Collins, Colorado 60526 Re: Collindale 85 - Horsetooth Road Improvements Dear Larry: Our Chief Construction Inspector, Dave Stringer, has informed me that Bartran Homes is currently in the process of constructing the public right-of-way improvements to Horsetooth Road from Lochwood Drive east to the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. During the meeting, on Wednesday, November 5th, between Bartran Homes, Loveland Excavating, and our Construction Inspection Division, Dave informed you of our concern about starting this project and still providing a good street surface for the public. At that time you verbally committed to ensure us that an asphalt surface would be installed on Horsetooth Road within the next 2 or 3 weeks. I appreciate your commitment to provide an asphalt driving surface until the project can be completed next spring. However, I feel that to allow the removal of the existing asphalt surface this year would be a mistake. Construction work which is undertaken at this time of year is subject to many delays and problems due to the weather. With cold nighttime temperatures and cool daytime highs, the possibility of placing an asphalt pavement in less than acceptable conditions is probable. Historically, the normal weather pattern is for storms of differing intensities to pass through our area every few days. It is highly unlikely that the work to Horsetooth Road will be completed in the anticipated time frame. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - ENGINEERING Larry Kline November 10, 1986 Page 2 Knowing the many unforeseen problems which affect the final outcome of an asphalt product constructed in this type of weather, I do not feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow the removal of the existing asphalt pavement on Horsetooth Road this year. I regret the inconvenience this decision may cause your firm, but to allow construction of Horsetooth at this time would be a disservice to the traveling public. Regretfully, Gary U i e d e Director of Engineering Services CITY OF FORT COLLINS OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 22, 1987 Mr. Bill Bartran c/o Bartran Homes, Inc. 1500 Quail Hollow Court Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Bill, I received your request for permission to start the reconstruction of curb and gutter on Horsetooth Road adjacent to the Collindale '87 PUD, prior to the end of the 2 week appeal period for the PUD approval. Since you stated that you will accept responsibility for any consequences of doing the work prior to all documents being recorded, (official approval), we will allow you to proceed. Sincerely Michael R. Herzig Development Coordinator MH/bh 300 LaPo,te Ave PO Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 221 6750 April 21, 1987 Mr. Mike Herzig Office of Development Services City of Fort Collins 300 Laporte Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Mr. Herzig: Bartran Homes, Inc. requests permission to re -construct the curb and gutter on Horsetooth Road adjacent to the Collindale 87 PUD. We realize the PUD has been approved but is waiting to be re- corded until the two week period for appeals has passed. We accept responsibility for any consequence doing this work prior to all docu- ments being recorded. This approval will enable us to complete all of the Horsetooth Road improvements without any cuts or changes in the full depth asphalt surfacirig. Sincerely, William D. Bartran, President Bartran Homes, Inc. cc: Ted Shephard Jim Newell 1500 Quail Hollow Court 0 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 • Ph. (303) 223-2200 STEWARr&ALSSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Surveyors August 22, 1988 d.. Mr. Robert Smith Director of Storm Drainage Utility City of Fort Collins P 0 Box 580 n Fort Collins, Co. 80522 11.E Dear Bob: This is regarding the storm drainage plan and the detention pond for a part of Collindale '85 P.U.D. being developed by Bartran Homes, Inc. They are proposing to replace buildings "E" and "G" as shown on the Site Plan by Robb and Brenner, and approved April 28, 1986. On Sheet 3 of 12 of the approved utility plans these same buildings are labeled "C" and "D". They are located along the Southwesterly line of the Detention Pond. The amended site plan has 17,215 square feet of impervious cover and the original plan had 18,725 square feet of impervious cover which results in a decrease, of 1,510 square feet of hard surfacing. Therefore, the storm water runoff will be decreased by approximately 0.09 c.f.s. in a two year storm and 0.25 c. f. s. in a 100 year storm. The detention pond's Southwesterly boundary is being revised slightly to accomodate the new site plan. It is proposed to fill in an area of the pond of 385 square feet adjacent to the most Northerly duplex. It is also proposed to enlarge the pond in two other locations by 1,630 square feet to accomodate the proposed filled area. These proposed pond boundary changes are shown on the enclosed "Amended Building Envelope and Utility Plan" drawn August 16, 1988. The net result of the proposed Amended Site Plan is less runoff and increased detention capacity. Therefore, there is no negative impact on the drainage system. If you have any questions, regarding this project, please call. Sincerely, Richard A. Rutherford, P. E & L.S. President 1km James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc. 214 N. Howes Street PO. Box 429 Ft. Collins, CO 80522 3031482-9331 '25 South Hov.es • Suite 880 • P 0. Box 251 • Collins. CO 80522 • (303) 484-01'7 a s Achilcclnre � -- Planning i Design September 16, 1988 Mr. Joe Frank City of Fort Collins Planning Department P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Re: Collindale 85' Administrative Change Dear Joe, I asked Dick Rutherford to verify Buildings 2 and 3 do not encroach on the utility easement between them. They located the Building envelopes mathematically and the envelope for Building 2 is .41 feet from the easement at the closest point and gets farther from it as the easement extends southeast. Refer to Stewart and Associates Drawing dated 8/16/88. Our drawing SP-2 was coordinated with Stewarts drawing. S i �� ly , William O. Brenner, Jr., AIA President WOB/lk cc: Bill Bartran j u L 14 1989 Mr. Mike Herzig Development Coordinator City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colo. 80522 Dear Mike: UNIVERSITY REALTY,INC. July 13, 1989 POST OFFICE BOX 471 FORT COLLINS, COLO. 80522 (303) 226-2211 I am writing this as the Managing Partner of Fox Meadows II, A Colorado General Partnership. We own property at the southeast corner of Timberline Road and Horsetooth Road. The land fronts for one -quarter of a mile on Timberline Road. For approximately the last two years we have been trying to complete development on the approximately fifteen (15) acres. At first, we wanted to complete BigHorn and Timberline Roads without any interior development and that was not acceptable with your department. Next, we went through several engineering changes involving BigHorn. Then, some more changes on Timberline. Our engineering costs increased with each change. Finally, after many indecisions and changes by various City departments, a Final Plan was settled on and a Preliminary was engineered and passed. Now I am informed another indecision has been reached on Timberline Road. An eighty-eight (88) foot wide roadway was engineered and now apparently it has been narrowed to seventy (70) feet. My understanding is that your department still wants the eighty-eight (88) feet dedicated to the City for future use. This leaves eighteen (18) feet of ground to the property line. We are looking at eighteen (18) feet for one -quarter of a mile. As you recall, you are taking seventy (70) feet from the landowners on the east side of "timberline Road, and the price has not been settled at this time. There are problems involved in this situation. Landscaping and maintenance of the area by which party and the cost involved are certainly problems. July 13, 1989 Page Two I am in the middle of a sales transaction involving some of this Timberline frontage and this event has turned things upside down. I request a hearing as soon as possible with your staff. My legal firm will be in attendance, along with a partner or two. My legal firm can meet on Monday, July 24, Tuesday, July 25, Thursday, July 27, or Friday, July 28, 1989. Can a specific day be settled on by Tuesday, July 18, so all of us can arrange our schedules sometime in advance? My number is 226-2211 and my secretary is Angie. Sincerely, ?ICJ �c, ` K. Bill Tiley, Managing rtner FOX MEADUNS 11 ac cc: Art March, Jr. Ramsey Mya t: t ,-Rick Richter, Assistant Development Coordinator Tom Peterson, Head City Planner Ted Shephard, City Planner Rick Ensdorff, City Traffic Engineer Barbrpn Building homes. Building tradition. July 17, 1989 Mr. Mike Herzig Development Engineer City Of Fort Collins PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear Mike; This is to request that you initiate the vacation of three 6.00 foot wide phone and T.V. easements situated in Collindale P.U.D. '85, City of Fort Collins, Colorado. The site plan has been amended and the three easements fall in proposed building envelopes. The legal descriptions of the easements and letters from U.S. West and Columbine Cablevision agreeing to the vacation are enclosed. Also enclosed are copies of the grading and utility plans which depict the easements. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Daniel K. Bartran 1644 Alcott St. • Fort Collins, CO 80525 • 303/223.2200 1Develc, ient Services Engineering Department t Citv or fort Collins March 28, 19819 Attention: Jess Morrison Department of Housing and Urban Development H.U.D. #101-34086 Re: Collindale P.U.D. 85 - Buildings D, E, F & G It is standard policy for the City of Fort Collins to accept for perpetual maintenance those public right-of-way constructions which have been approved by the City and which have passed all required guarantee periods. This includes the water main, sanitary sewer mains, storm sewer lines and facilities. Yours truly, David Stringer Chief Construction Inspector W LiPorte Avenue • P.O. hog 7,80 • Fort Collin,,, COSO22-0 80 • (303) 221-6007; � I �P�L-yi �1� � t� ��d ou Via m c= ' �� '� �7 qr S�14r ��nJ 33 /1 Car /Arn f es- �`�N� �j QU Arl I- ftouz(.-) Yak e4 e s t.- uai / /,4 //o co I o % Pr I9 De, ' oment Services Engineering Department September 1, 1989 Attention: Jess Morrison Department of Housing and Urban Development H.U.D. #101-34086 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Collindale P.U.D. 85 - Buildings H, I, J, & O It is standard policy for the City of Fort Collins to accept for perpetual maintenance those public right-of-way constructions which have been approved by the City and which have passed all required guarantee periods. This includes the water main, sanitary sewer rains, storm sewer lines and facilities. Yours truly, David Stringer Chief Construction Inspector ��il L� ['�rrre Avenue ['.O. Box 380 • Fort Lolling, CO ,`�0322-0380 • (303) 221-0000 Dew ment Services Engineering Department November 27, 1989 Attention: Jess Morrison Department of dousing and Urban Development H.U.D. - #101-34086 Re: Collindale P.U.D. 85 - Buildings K, L, & N It is standard policy for the City of Fort Collins to accept for perpetual maintenance those public right-of-way constructions which have been approved by the City and which have passed all required guarantee periods. This includes the water main, sanitary sewer mains, storm sewer lines and facilities. Yours truly, David Stringer Chief Construction Inspector '00 L<�f'��rte A�rnue I'.C'. Box ; (1 • Fort Collins, C( �3(l�«-0580 1 - - hhO- Develop nt Services Engineering Department November 27, 1989 Attention: Jess Morrison Department of dousing and Urban Development H.U.D. - r101-34086 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Collindale P.U.D. 85 - Buildings W, X, Y, & Z It is standard policy for the City of Fort Collins to accept for perpetual maintenance those public right-of-way constructions which have been approved by the City and which have passed all required guarantee periods. This includes -the water main, sanitary sewer ruins, storm sewer lines and facilities. Yours truly, a David Stringer Chief Construction Inspector ;I1(` I ,11"urto A"crue • P.O.. Boy a80 • FOrt Collin,, C_0 80�22-U�80 ;303; ''.�e f �rorl /CQ.ra-b e ash �LU/ /Ces�aN Ir�i � �e s cQCcps -(G TPA J— �' S 64ajs a,�j p� �- r cis- 1530 �c�.) r`lzal1a � D A 1 "7 zY W('S{ Clk-c f cU (-fviQKi-M am �&,j �A-J- 7 � r 7 INC- 010 -Case �o��► )5� �rer�� �� � yes 7 CC COLLINDALE 85 PUD NOISE IMPACTS The proposed project is affected by noise sources of the Union Pacific Railroad. The anticipated noise level is proposed to be handled as follows. 1. Building Placement - All buildings are placed with either ends of buildings facing the tracks or buildings are placed askew to the tracks. A distance of 120' minimum from tracks will be maintained. (Less than 100 of the units are at this setback). 2. Site Barrier - A wood fence along Lots 20 thru 23 and dense landscaping along the R.O.W., east of Buildings 14, 15, and 19 is proposed. 3. Building Construction - Wood siding, insulation, double glazed windows, and weatherstripping will greatly reduce sound transmission into buildings. 84 dba Anticipated Train Noise - 8 dba* Loss Over Distance of 120' - 10 dba Loss For Fence or Dense Landscaping 66 dba Outside Level 70 dba is considered acceptable - 30 dba Loss for Building Construction (Estimate) 36 dba Inside Level 55 dba is considered acceptable. *Buildings in excess of 280' from tracks fall into an acceptable category based. on distance alone. POPULATION PROJECTIONS PROPOSAL: #11-86 COLLINDALE '85 PUD DESCRIPTION: 99 units on 12.954 acres DENSITY: 7.6 du/gross acre General Population 99 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 346.5 School Age Population Elementary - 99 (units) x •422 (pupils/unit) = 41.78 Junior High - 99 (units) x •148 (pupils/unit) = 14.65 Senior High - 99 (units) x .127 (pupils/unit) = 12.57 Design Affected Schools Capacity Enrollment Shepardson Elementary 546 581 Boltz Junior High 930 905 Fort Collins Senior High 1310 1279 January 14, 1986 Ms. Bonnie Tripoli Development Coordinator City of Fort: Collins f.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Bonnie, Thanks for your help in reviewing early our submission for the Collindale PUD 85. Our purpose is to bring to the surface any concerns that will impact planning and site engineerinQ aimed at a spring construction start. We are workinn towards the following schedule: Preliminary Submittal (Formal) - February 5, 1986 Preliminary Approval by Planning and Zoning - Harch 24, 1986 Final Submittal - March 5, 1986 Final Approval by Planning and Zoning - April 21, 1986 Start Construction - Immediately upon approval In order to submit on March 5 for Final Approval at the April fleeting we must Benin oar final engineering work right now, essentially 2 months before Pre- liminary Review. We appreciate your cooperation in helping us keep on schedule. Ye will see you and your Utilities Coordinating Committee on Thursday, January Y , 19R6 at 2:15 p.m. Sincerely, William 0. Brenner, Jr. Vice President: Architect, AIA cc: Bill Bartran Marty Kosek Nclosures: 4 copies of Site Plan with Preliminary Utility Layout UOB/1 k CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLANNING DIVISION February 20, 1986 Mr. Gordon Hughes Robb and Brenner Architects/Planners P.O. Box 251 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear Gordon: Staff has reviewed the Preliminary PUD submittal for Collindale PUD '85 and has the following comments to offer. Revisions reflecting these comments are due by noon on March 5, 1985. Items that cannot be shown graphically or noted on the plans should be addressed in writing. Reductions of all plans and colored renderings should be submitted by March 14th. 1. The Light and Power Utility has requested a 12' easement along Carlton Avenue and a 15' easement along Horsetooth Road. (Adjustments to the Landscape Plan will be needed to avoid conflicts). 2. A 10' easement must be dedicated for the 21" sewer line north of Lot 23. 3. A repay exists on the water line in Horsetooth. 4. Additional storm drainage information and corrections are needed: a. The soils report cautions against basements, yet garden levels are proposed. Please explain. b. All calculations should be provided. c. The pond bottom and outfall swale are too flat. Even though the City will not maintain it, 0.13 is not acceptable. Perhaps a low -flow subdrain could be provided. As proposed, the plan would create problems for future property owners. d. Although a future pond will be built for the 8th filing, the proposed 9th pond must be able to handle the existing Q100 flow from the 8th, or flows must be routed somewhere else. 5. All plans must be 24" x 36". 6. The south sanitary sewer should be moved under the asphalt drive. -- - __ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 7. Staff suggests moving the fire hydrant from the island to the greenbelt. 8. The extent and timing of developer participation in Horsetooth Road improvements must be discussed. Improvements as a City capital project are not anticipated for 3-5 years. I would be glad to set up a meeting with the City Traffic Engineer at your convenience. 9. At two locations, parking is quite close to the Horsetooth Road sidewalk. The grade is a concern, as well the ability to provide a landscape buffer. 10. All 24' private drives must be posted "no parking - fire lane" on both sides. Also, a note should be added to the site plan: "Address sign will be provided at project entrance to indicate all inclusive addresses. Sign will be 4 square feet in area." 11. Siting of garages is still a concern. The Fire Department is also concerned about garages facing the access drive without a 0' or 20' setback. We can discuss the need for specific revisions when we meet. 12. If this tract has not previously been platted, a subdivision plat must be submitted. 13. Please indicate building envelope lines and show dimensions. Also, show distance of building envelopes to property lines. Garages should be within envelopes. 14. For Lots 20-23, indicate standard or typical building setbacks. 15. Signs must comply with the Sign Code. 16. Handicapped units are required by the State Statutes (1 per 7 units) and this will be enforced by the Building Department. One handicapped parking space per handicapped unit should be provided. 17. What type of "energy efficient" furnaces will be provided? 18. Please show dumpster locations on the site plan. 19. The concrete pan design in Carlton Avenue is a concern of the City Traffic Engineer. Please work closely with Engineering on this to make the slope as gradual as possible. 20. The northernmost intersection on the private drive (interior of the site) is somewhat awkward. Let's discuss design alternatives. 21. Staff suggests an increase in the density of tree plantings overall, additional plantings in the detention area, and the addition of street trees on Horsetooth Road. ( I have a marked -up copy of the Landscape Plan to illustrate our concerns. We can discuss it when we meet.) Also, a typical plan of foundation plantings should be provided.