HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLEVINS - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-05-28Develop: nt Services
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
October 18, 1991
Robert K. Glover
2101 Lindenmeier Rd.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Dear Robert,
City Staff has reviewed your submittal for the Blevins Court Lot 9
PUD and offers the following comments:
1. Please indicate on the site plan the proposed setbacks to all
lot lines.
2. Relocate the north arrow and scale of the site plan so it
doesn't get lost on the site plan and also, indicate a
separate scale for the vicinity map. Place the title (BLEVINS
COURT, LOT 9 PUD) in large letters across the top and center
of the Site/Landscape Plan. The plan should be labeled as a
Site and Landscape Plan, since you have combined the two on
one plan„
3. Indicate on the site plan, what the existing use is for lots
5, 6, 7, 11, 14, as well as the two large lots to the north
and west of this property. What is the existing use of the
property directly to the west of this lot, is it a yard for
the existing house?
4. A fire hydrant must be provided within 400' of the lot.
Please show on the site plan and Utility plan where the
closest hydrant/s are located.
5. Any damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk must be repaired in
conjunction with this request.
6. Electric service to the building will be underground.
7. The Utility Plan has a note that existing overhead electric
(and phone) will be placed underground. This will not happen
at this time, as far as electric is concerned. Contact Doug
Martine at Light and Power, if you have questions about this.
Contact US West for information on their schedule for
undergrounding existing phone lines.
8. Staff encourages you to coordinate installation of the
electric system with Light and Power. There will be
development charges from Light and Power, contact Doug Martine
for more details.
281 North College Avemie • P.O. Boy 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80322-0;80 • (301) �" 1-n-;tl
PROJECT
City of ns
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 3 Mar 92 DEPARTMENT:
ITEM: 42-91B BLEVINS COURT PUD, Lot 9 - Final
Please respond to this project by Friday, March 13, 1992
Planner: Kirsten Whetstone
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
;7
�q,e
Date: �/ Signature:
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑
LA)ilvllp-�' Ll
PLAT
SITE
LANDSCAPE
UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
PROJECT
City of Fort Collins
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 7 Jan 92 DEPARTMENT: ij , J, ;
ITEM: 42-91A BLEVINS COURT PUD, Lot 9 - Prel.
Please respond to this project by Friday, January 17, 1992
Planner: Kirsten Whetstone
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Date: p,,� Signature:
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑
El
El
�ativ'1 1�1n9„k
PLAT
SITE
LANDSCAPE
UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Col-lins
DATE: 7 Jan 92 DEPARTMENT: C2', TV
ITEM: 42-91A BLEVINS COURT PUD, Lot 9 - Prel.
Please respond to this project by Friday, January 17, 1992
Planner: Kirsten Whetstone
No Problems
xx Problems or Concerns (see below)
The only concern that Columbine CableVision has with this project would
be to have the building prewired for Cable T.V. in a home run system
with cable to our standards. We would be willing to advise the builder
in order to accomplish this.
Date: J r3/z Signature:,
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOS 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
C�
rk
PROJECT
City o«rtCol�, y COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 7 Jan 92 DEPARTMENT:
ITEM: .42-91A BLEVINS COURT PUD, Lot 9 - Prel.
Please respond to this project by Friday, January 17, 1992
Planner: Kirsten Whetstone
No Problems
—A--0
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Date: 0//0/ 9� Signature• T• "�"�— S1�'5 am r.
� 3
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTII COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
0
A
City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 7 Jan 92 DEPARTMENT: LS v�e4
ITEM: 42-91A BLEVINS COURT PUD, Lot 9 - Prel.
Please respond to this project by Friday, January 17, 1992
Planner: Kirsten Whetstone
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Dat ?� Signatur6p"Z�
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
PLANING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O-BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
PROJECT
AIN City af�,��ll,,,= COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 1 oar 91 DEPARTMENT: 9
ITEM: #42-91 BLEVINS COURT PUD, Lot 9
Preliminary & Final
Please respond to this project by Friday, October 11, 1991
Project Planner: Kirsten Whetstone
No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
Afrr��rv�-fie
•fu ol-nVe , u1 4, � ,
Ae+7�1 I,-;,
Date: t 2A Signature:
CHECK IF REVISIONS REQUIRED: ❑
atpzj� gd��J-
PLAT
SITE
LANDSCAPE
UTILITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9. The City Water Utilities Department will install a 6-inch
water main in Blevins Ct. next spring (Spring of 1992). The
water service for lot 9 will be tapped to this main.
Coordinate with Mark Taylor at 221-6681 on the timing of your
water service.
10. A sanitary sewer main exists along the southern boundary of
this lot. A 15-foot utility easement must be provided north
of this existing sewer main, measured from the center line of
the main, 15 feet to the north. The sewer service for this
lot will be tapped to this sewer main. Please coordinate with
Kerrie Ashbeck at 221-6750 for information on how to record
that utility easement. Since the lot is already platted, you
would need to describe the easement and file a legal
description of it as a separate document. Please provide this
information to the Planning/Engineering Department and show
the easement on the site plan and Utility Plans.
11. A final planting list describing the proposed species and
sizes should be shown on the site/landscape plan. This should
include a listing for existing trees and shrubs as well. I
have enclosed a photo copy of typical notes and planting
schedules; and details which we request for landscape plans,
please add these to the final site/landscape plan. If you
propose to remove existing vegetation, have you first
considered relocating it? Staff would discourage the removal
of any existing significant vegetation.
12. The primary concern from the Stormwater Department is that the
drainage report is a preliminary report and if this project is
going as a preliminary/final PUD to the Planning and Zoning
Board, then the drainage report needs to be upgraded to a
final, with final details.
13. Off -site flows are a major concern with this project. This
type of in -fill project typically has potential to cut-off
flows that have been routed to a vacant piece of land,
especially in older developments where todays City standards
for drainage control have not been met. The report is good
for a preliminary report but lacks the final detail needed for
final approval. Please see the redlined report and plans for
detailed comments and return them to Glen Schlueter with
revisions,. If you have questions about the drainage report
please contact Glen at 221-6589.
14. An erosion control plan for construction should be submitted
with the final drainage plan.
15. The Utility Plans are preliminary in nature. If you intend to
present this project to the Planning and Zoning Board as a
preliminary/final PUD there are many loose ends that need to
be addressed. Please coordinate with Kerrie Ashbeck or Mike
Herzig at 221-6750 as soon as possible to ensure that you know
what Utility Plan revisions are required. Engineering will
need to review and approve the plan revisions prior to the
November 18th Planning and Zoning Board Hearing. Please do
not delay in getting them the revisions to review.
16. If you are not prepared to spend the time and money for final
Utility Plans prior to a land use decision (concerning number
of units, bedrooms, parking spaces, landscaping, fencing) from
the P&Z Board, you have the option of taking this project to
the Board as a preliminary PUD in November and as a final PUD
on December 16th.
17. The site plan is labeled as a preliminary site plan which has
caused some additional confusion. Please let me know whether
this is a preliminary or a preliminary and final PUD (you have
paid for the later, so if you decided to split -it up, you
would not have additional planning fees).
18. Please label Prospect Road on the plans.
19. The orientation of the units and general configuration of the
site plan is well done and shows good sensitivity to the
surrounding residential lots. Planning Staff has questions
though, about the amount of parking on the site and feels that
this large amount of parking is cramping the setbacks, open
landscaped areas, and landscaped buffers.
20. The trash enclosure should be relocated to the southeast
corner of: the lot where it will be less visible from the road
and the other homes. The two southern most parking spaces
will be difficult to back out of in the configuration shown.
If the eastern space is converted for the trash enclosure, it
would allow an automobile exiting the western space to have
sufficient room to back up before exiting the lot in forward.
Staff would recommend moving the motorcycle parking spaces to
another area (south end of parking lot?) and converting the
area to landscaping. Staff would encourage more landscaping
of the front yard area, to be more compatible with the
neighborhood.
21. Staff would like to see the landscaped buffer area, on the
east property line, increased to at least 7'or 81. This would
then allow a 14-15' separation between the existing house to
the east and a parked car in this lot.
22. Staff agrees that the fence needs to be broken up as you have
indicated, rather than having it a solid wall which would only
separate this use from the neighborhood rather than integrate
it. The fence should not extend beyond the front corner of
the existing house to the north to preserve the openness of
the front yards. The privacy fence on the north property
should extend to a point somewhere between the two trees. If
you still wanted it to turn east at right angles for a short
stretch for added privacy, that would be fine, but watch out
that it doesn't cut up the open areas too much.
23. The privacy fence on the east property line should probably
extend as far as any parking. It would be better to relocate
the handicapped parking space and extend the landscaped area
into than space. The fence could then be brought back about
15' which would help preserve the openness of the front yards
on Blevins Court.
24. By now you have probably noticed that we have suggested that
you eliminate 3 parking spaces to make room for buffer and
landscaped areas. Making these changes will make it possible
to address the absolute criteria #26, #27 and #28, which ask
whether the site is organized in an efficient, functional, and
cohesive manner; whether the elements of the site plan are
arranged so that activities are integrated with the
organization scheme of the neighborhood; and whether the
design and elements of the site plan allows a favorable
relationship between the buildings, open space, circulation,
and landscaping.
26. The project meets the City requirements for parking, without
the three spaces mentioned above. It may not meet the
neighborhood concern or reality of each bedroom being occupied
by an automobile owner and each unit having one guest every
night. If this is the parking scenario that you anticipate,
then it appears that a reduction in the number of units, or
bedrooms is necessary.
27. Reflecting on the neighborhood's concerns about the density of
this project, from a bedroom per lot perspective, the Planning
Staff highly recommends that you consider a maximum of 6
bedrooms on this site. These 6 bedrooms could be in any kind
of configuration, from 3- duplexes to 2- triplexes or even a
one bedroom, a two bedroom and a three bedroom unit. With any
of these configurations, you would only need to provide 9
parking spaces, using your anticipated parking scenario of one
per bedroom plus one additional per unit.
28. From a neighborhood compatibility point of view, the people
density of 6 bedrooms is much more in line with the existing
character of the neighborhood, than it is with 9 bedrooms.
29. Additional landscaping should be added to soften and screen
the east wall of the building; perhaps a few larger deciduous
trees with some lower foundation shrubs would work there.
30. The other major issue on this project is the Residential
Density :Point Chart. Staff does not have any problems with
Criteria B, C, D, F, G, and J. Criteria E has not been
justified with a letter from the school saying that the school
does meet all of the requirements of the compulsory education
laws of 'the State of Colorado. It is your responsibility to
provide us with this information and certification, as we
normally use only public schools for this criteria. We will
not contact the school. Without certification, we cannot
count the 10 points.
31. If you were to propose 2 units, you would need 70-80 points.
Without criteria E the project achieves 95 points, thus
meeting the Residential Density Chart.
32. Please provide information about the grocery store at the
Choice Center Shopping Center if you choose to use points from
Criteria A. Is it a full -line grocery? what is the square
footage? What are hours of operation? Also include a list of
what other shops and services are available in the center.
33. Does the! existing neighborhood have protective covenants
recorded at the Court House? It would be a good idea to check
this out, some single family neighborhoods have covenants
which prohibit the use of a lot for any use other than single
family houses.
This concludes staff comments at this time. In order to stay on
schedule for the November 18, 1991 Planning and Zoning Board
hearing, please note the following deadlines:
Plan revisions are due October 30, 1991 by 12:00 noon.
PMT's, colored renderings, 10 prints are due Nov. 11, 1991.
Final signed mylars and other documents are due Nov. 14, by
12:00 noon.
If you have any questions about these comments or would like to
schedule a time to meet to discuss them, please contact me at 221-
6750.
sincerely, J j'
Kirsten A. Whetstone
Project Planner
cc Kerrie Ashbeck
David Knox
Jeff Couch
Janet Meisel
Emily Smith- Prospect Shields Neighborhood Group
Developm 11 Services
Planning Department
January 27, 1992
Robert K. Glover
2101 Lindenmeier Rd.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Dear Robert,
City Staff has reviewed your re -submittal for the Blevins Court Lot
9 PUD and offers the following comments:
1. The City Water Utilities Department will install a 6-inch
water main in Blevins Ct. next spring (Spring of 1992). The
water service for lot 9 will be tapped to this main.
Coordinate with Mark Taylor at 221-6681 on the timing of your
water service. A building permit will not be granted until
this utility construction is completed.
2. A sanitary sewer main exists along the southern boundary of
this lot.. A 15-foot utility easement must be provided north
of this Existing sewer main, measured from the center line of
the main, 15 feet to the north. The sewer service for this
lot will be tapped to this sewer main. Please coordinate with
Kerrie Ashbeck at 221-6750 for information on how to record
that utility easement. Since the lot is already platted, you
would need to describe the easement and file a legal
description of it as a separate document. Please provide this
information to the Planning/Engineering Department and show
the easement on the site plan and utility plans.
3. A final planting list describing the existing and proposed
species and sizes of trees and shrubs should be shown on the
final site/landscape plan.
4. Off -site flows are a major concern with this project. This
type of in -fill project typically has potential to cut-off
flows that have been routed to a vacant piece of land,
especially in older developments where City standards for
drainage control have not been met. The report is good for a
preliminary report but lacks the final detail needed for final
approval. Please see the redlined report and plans for
detailed comments and return them to Glen Schlueter with
revisions. If you have questions about the drainage report
please contact Glen at 221-6589.
5. An erosion control plan for construction should be submitted
with the final drainage plan.
28l North Colle,,e Avenue • I'.O. Bpi-\ :;80 • Fort Collins, CO 8052240580 • (303) 221-h ;0
6 . Planning Staf f has concerns about the amount of parking on the
site and feels that the amount of parking that seems to be
required, from the neighborhood perspective, is cramping the
site, setbacks, open landscaped areas, and landscaped buffers.
The parking situation seems to be a symptom of the density.
7. The grass-crete areas are a definite help in keeping the
amount of hard surface to a minimum, but Staff believes that
it would be difficult to enforce that area as overflow parking
given the proximity to the front doors. Maintenance would
likely be an on -going problem. Staff would recommend moving
the turfstone area to replace the three northern most parking
spaces on the east side of the property where they would be
less heavily used. Six spaces would more than meet the City
requirements for a duplex.
8. A motorcycle space is called out in the notes but not on the
site plan. Staff would recommend that you provide a
motorcycle space so potential motorcycle owners don't take up
a regular size parking space. Perhaps north of the trash
enclosure would be a good location. City Code requires that
parking lots with 6 or more spaces provide motorcycle parking.
9. A handicapped space is also called out in the notes but not
shown on the site plan. By Code, handicapped spaces are not
required for parking lots with fewer than 15 spaces. If you
plan to design a space to meet the dimensions of a H/C space
but don't. plan to stripe it you would not have to indicate the
space as H/C. You could provide a note on the site plan
indicating that the space is sized as such.
10. Staff agrees that the fence needs to be broken up as you have
indicated, rather than having it a solid wall which would only
separate this use from the neighborhood rather than integrate
it. There has been some concern from the neighbors to the
south that the fence should continue across the south property
line to provide privacy both for the back yards of houses on
Prospect and for the residents of lot 9 on Blevins Court. The
Planning Staff agrees that the south property line should be
a continuous fence from the southwest corner to the trash
enclosure. However, the other openings make sense.
10. Reflecting on the Planning and Zoning Board's and Prospect
Shields Neighborhood Group's concerns about the density of
this project, from a bedroom per lot perspective, the Planning
Staff recommends that you consider a maximum of 6 bedrooms on
this site. City parking requirements would be in the range of
4 to 6 spaces for most configurations of 6 bedrooms.
11. From a neighborhood compatibility point of view, the people
density of a duplex is much more in line with the existing
character of the neighborhood. Planning Staff feels that, at
this time, they would be unable to recommend approval of a
tri-plex. The feeling is that a duplex would be more in line
Develop, �nt Services
Plannini; Department
Citv of Fort Collins
March 19, 1992
Kint Glover
2101 Lindenmeier Road
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Dear Mr. Glover,
City Staff has reviewed your submittal for Blevins Subdivision Lot
9 PUD- Final and offers the following written comments:
1. The added architectural elements are a big improvement, they
really do add interest. Please include architectural
elevations for the south and west elevations.
2. The north elevation shows some upright evergreen landscaping
which the landscape plan does not show. Some upright or
vertical vegetation would provide color, texture, and softness
to the broad side of the north elevation.
3. Staff recommends additional foundation plantings on the west
and south sides of the building as well.
4. Will there be a privacy fence, or portion of fence or screen
between the two units in the back? Will there be a patio area
or deck? If so, these should be shown on the site plan and
should be included in the building envelope. One of the All
Development criteria of the Land Development Guidance System
is for provision of outdoor privacy areas for residential
units. Patios with a partial fence or landscaped hedge (such
as a lilac hedge) separating them, would address the criteria.
5. Please indicate on the plan, the turf areas and list the seed
mixture (or sod) that is proposed.
6. Will the bicycle area be paved?
7. Include a fence detail or description on the site plan.
8. Add a line for the Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Board
signature, just above the "Owner's Certification".
9. Delete reference to the optional compact parking space.
10. Any installation of natural gas services must be done prior to
the re -paving of Blevins Court.
11. Locate both gas meters on the north wall of the duplex.
?�I �. C��IIr��;� A\enue l'.O. B��� DSO • Iort Collins, CO S052 -0580 (�U�) 2�1-fbi:�()
12. Minor information and changes are needed to the Utility Plans.
Redlined plans have been sent to Parson's and Associates.
13. Please refer to the comments on the Utility Plans for Water
and Wastewater comments.
14. Please refer to the redlined Drainage Plans for Stormwater's
comments.
This concludes staff comments at this time. In order to stay on
schedule for the April 27, 1992 Planning and Zoning Board hearing,
please note the following deadlines:
Plan revisions are due April 1, 1992 by 12:00 noon (no joke!)
PMT1s, colored renderings, and 10 prints are due April 20th.
Final mylars and other documents are due April 23rd by 12:00.
If you have any questions about these comments or would like to
schedule a time to meet to discuss them, please contact me at 221-
6750.
Sincerely,
44- )AVW--Al
Kirsten Whetstone
Project Planner
cc: David Knox, Architect
Glen Schlueter, Stormwater
Kerrie Ashbeck, Engineering
file