The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCASEY'S CAR WASH - MAJOR AMENDMENT - 23-09 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)REVISION ROUTING SHEET Item:J Date Received: Planner: Ol,l . Engineer: 6a City oY Fort Collins CUMU.\T PLWINUG ItemsRequested • . . . u C .• .-• r - • • • . / 1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Advance • . 1 . / ' nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn . 1: 1 . - • 1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn • 11 . nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 1 ' 1 - . • ®nnnnnElJnnnnnnnnn ,; 1.. - .• -1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn :. nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn .1 : •. - n�nnnnn■�nnnnnnnnn Natural Resources nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn • . / 1 1 • nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn •:. .. nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn •. nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn . • 1 • : nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn - • nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn • . • . 1 1 1 • nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn . 1. • . - nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 1 - - . - 1 • nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn .- nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Technical Servicesnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn . -. • . - ..1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 1 .. . 1 • / . 1 • nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Water & Wastewater ".: now■O�o��n�� Water .1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn - 1- . nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn .1.. nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn •• nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn .1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Railroad:Schnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn • . • • .... nnnnnnnnnnnnnn0 Thompson::.. n nnnnnnnnn®.... • 1 1 1 11 I IN�� RMMMMMMM I Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Matt Wempe Topic: Site Plan Number: 47 Created: 8/7/2009 [8/7/09] As previously discussed with the property and business owner, the minor amendment approved in January 2009 did not properly show the Mason Corridor BRT right- of-way line. City Surveying will stake the property the week of 8/3. Number: 48 Created: 8/7/2009 [8/7/09] Due to issues from Comment 47, additional right-of-way needs are anticipated to impact the landscaped island in the rear of the property. The owner indicated that this will be removed, as will the landscaping and seating area adjacent to the north car wash building. These changes were not included in the approved minor amendment, but must be included as part of this major amendment. Any questions on the Mason Corridor BRT right-of-way can be forwarded to Steve McQuilkin at 416.2484 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 45 Created: 8/4/2009 [8/4/09] Adjust proposed curb stop and meter pit locations as noted on the redlined plans. Another short round of review is necessary to address these staff comments. Please see the attached Revision Routing Sheet. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re- submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Q 4tMeve Olt City Planner cc: Susan Joy Mowery Development JR Engineering Current Planning file #23-09 Page 5 Number: 32 Created: 6/24/2009 [8/3/09] [6/24/09] Please dimension and show all row and easements and label them as existing or proposed to match the utility plan. Number: 33 Created: 6/24/2009 [7/30/09] Repeat. Please label the arbor as proposed. [6/24/09] Remove the label "Approved Arbor over existing seating area" and just show the proposed arbor and label it as proposed. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 28 Created: 6/24/2009 [8/3/09] Still missing 1606(a). [6/24/09] Detail Sheets - Add details 701, 702, 707 (or 708 depending on what is existing), 1601, 1602, 1603, 1606(a), 1607. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 36 Created: 6/26/2009 [8/5/09] I recommend that you meet with Russ Hovland from the FC Building Department to determine if your cafe and patio areas meet egress requirements to get patrons to the public way. From the submitted plans, it is difficult to determine the patio area and occupancy. Please be aware that the occupancy for the caf6 and patio areas will not be allowed to become an Assembly Occupancy (50 or more occupants) without additional requirements becoming applicable. OCCUPANT LOAD: The maximum occupancy of the cafe and associated outdoor seating area will need to be determined. Occupant load will determine Type of Occupancy (<50 is Business Occupancy, > or = 50 is Assembly), which also may influence other fire requirements, such as exiting and/or automatic fire sprinklers. Number: 37 Created: 6/26/2009 [8/5/09] The actual location of the hydrant differs from what is shown in the utility plan. Because the actual location is more removed from the roadway corner, it is less likely to be struck by a moving vehicle and therefore, we will allow the hydrant to remain in the current position. However, if it becomes a problem in the future, approved bollards may be required to be installed to protect the hydrant from damage. FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION: The fire hydrant that is going to be relocated needs to be moved farther off the curb face. Minimum distance is.' feet off the curb face but in this instance, I would recommend even more distance, since it is an area where all the vehicles will be turning, thus increasing the risk of the hydrant being hit by a vehicle. If the location cannot be changed, bollards must be installed in an approved manner. Page 4 Number: 41 Created: 8/3/2009 [8/3/09] Please show the proposed Mason Corridor improvements and label as "future Mason Corridor improvements to be built by others" so that we can see if there will be any conflicts with what you are proposing. This will need to be shown on all plan sets (site/landscape/utility). Please coordinate this with the Transportation Planning Department. Number: 43 Created: 8/4/2009 [8/4/09] Need to dimension all proposed retaining wall heights, all plan sets. If taller than 3' feet from bottom of footer to tow, then must provide a typical detail for it on the landscape and utility plans and this will trigger a need for detailed construction details at the time of building permit. Number: 44 Created: 8/4/2009 [8/4/09] The site and landscape plans need to show the same easements (dimensioned and labeled) and the utility plans. Need to show the proposed area of vacation by separate document as well. Number: 46 Created: 8/6/2009 [8/6/09] From Technical Services: 1. Text over text issues on the landscape plan. 2. Text has been "cut off' on the landscape plan. 3. Line over text issues on the elevation plan. 4. Line over text and text over text issues on the utility plan. 5. The basis of bearings on the utility easement and the utility and access easement vacation do not match the sketches. The line is incorrectly described in basis of bearings statement. Topic: Site and Landscape Plan Number: 29 Created: 6/24/2009 [8/3/09] [6/24/091 Either spell out all abbreviations or place an index listing out the abbreviations. Number: 30 Created: 6/24/2009 [7/30/09] Scanning issues still exist. This does not have to be addressed prior to hearing but must be addressed prior to final plan approval in Final Compliance. [6/24/09] See Appendix E6 for scanning requirements and see Tech Services if you have any questions. Please correct all line over text issues. Number: 31 Created: 6/24/2009 [7/30/09] Please show the detail on the site/landscape plans for the building department. It is great that you've included it on the civil sets but it needs to be shown here as well. Thank you. [6/24/09] A hand rail is proposed but there is no detail or information on any of the plan sets. Page 1 Number: 50 Created: 8/10/2009 [8/10/09] From a Planning standpoint having theo2 sheets of Site Plans, at different scales, is sufficient. Other departments are having difficulty with this and indicate that the utility plans do no show enough information about the entire Casey's site and 150' off -site. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 25 Created: 6/24/2009 [7/30/09] All sheets on all plan sets must show the entire property boundary and the same information. All plan sets must show all existing features within 150' of the project limits. Please see LCUASS and Appendix E4 for all other requirements. Please adjust your scale to accommodate the additional area or use match lines and key maps if extra sheets are needed. [6/24/09] All plan sets need to show the complete property boundary as well as dimension all public row & sidewalk widths. All plan sets must show existing features within 150' of the property limits (we are most interested in driveways, drive aisles, sidewalks, etc - anything to show how this development ties into or lines up with the other properties) and all plan sets must present the same information. The utility plan needs to dimension driveway widths and the location of the new curb at the Mason St Corridor side so that it is locatable in the field. It is unclear where the Mason Corridor relates to this development or how your proposal ties into it. Number: 26 Created: 6/24/2009 [7/30/09] Thank you for submitting the legal description and exhibit however I still need the vacation request. The vacation request must be reviewed and approved by the utilities prior to going to hearing so please send this ASAP. If you could send it and the corrected legal and exhibit per comment 46 electronically as well, I can route the request by email. This will save about a week's time over using snail mail. Thank you. [6/24/09] All proposed easements must have a legal description and an exhibit submitted for our review and approval along with the associated TDRFee. All easements to be vacated must submit a vacation request with an exhibit for our distribution to the various utility agencies for their review and approval. There is an additional TDRFee for that as well. Number: 39 Created: 7/30/2009 [7/30/09] Parking stalls are required to be a minimum of 19' deep. You may reduce the stall length by up to T with a 2' overhang. However, it does not appear that you have 2' between the parking stall flow line and the existing transformer box. Cars will constantly hit and damage the transformer so perhaps placing bollards in front of it will help - see Light and Power for their requirements. Whatever width is used up by this adjustment will need to be made up in the parking stall length. Number: 40 Created: 8/3/2009 [8/3/09] I understand there is additional work proposed on the west side of the property. Please show the property in its entirety along with all proposed work on all sheets, all plan sets. Page 2 fir, ,104 �, STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins MICHAEL CHALONA Date: 8/10/2009 LAND IMAGES, INC. 1136 E. STUART ST, STE 2040 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for Casey's Car Wash, Major Amendment - Type 1, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 24 Created: 6/23/2009 [8/4/09] With the reduction in the number of wash bays, there will be savings in water consumption. A further study of water usage may be beneficial to the business. If you wish to pursue such an evaluation, Laurie D'Audney is available to work with you. Her number is 970-221-6877. [6/23/09] No comments. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Site Plan Number: 7 Created: 6/22/2009 [8/10/09] Plans still not clear on how this area works. [6/22/09] Will the new curb along the north and south ends of the Detail Shop impede vehicular movement for the Car Pick Up Drive? Number: 11 Created: 6/22/2009 [8/10/09] Still unclear. [6/22/09] How is the existing pervious pavement (along the east side of the Detail Shop) working in this development? Apparently other developments are having problems with theirs. Number: 12 Created: 6/22/2009 [8/10/09] Still unclear. [6/22/09] Please graphically show the existing door in the Drive-Thru Car Wash building to the north. Number: 49 Created: 8/10/2009 [8/10/09] There are still numerous gaps, missing information, inconsistencies on the Site & Landscape Plans. Page 1