Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKING SOOPERS (CEDARWOOD) WTE COLOCATION - BDR - 38-06/B - CORRESPONDENCE - (12)P.1 YCyI FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET la:I•IN Anne Aspen Kelly Harrison COMPANY: DATE: 2/12/2007 FAN NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER 970416-2020 2 PIIONr NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER 303-74"599 (Cell) RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER Verizon Wireless cell site proposal ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW ❑ PLF.ASP COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES; COWMENTS: Hi Anne, My e-mail response keeps getting bounced back so I thought 1 would fax. Thanks, Kelly From Kelly Harrison <klhacr@msn.com> To: AAspen@fcgov.com Subject. RE: Conceptual Review Comment Letter Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:50 PM Hi Anne, One of the primary reasons we proposed our own pole was because the owner does not want us to collocate. If Verizon Wireless is able to make a 40-foot pole work in that area I would most likely apply for the freestanding pole. What is Planning's thought on this? Thank you, Kelly to •.4I t ' I - •ft. • ._ 1 . 15�11 J • It - Subject. Conceptual Review Comment Letter Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:13:59 -0700 Hi Kelly, Attached is the comment letter from your conceptual review for a wireless telecommunication facility at Cedarwood Plana. I've attached two versions --one pdf signed on letterhead for your files, one word file which you may use for the response letter required at submittal. I've also attached a C-1 file for you to fill out and return to Light and Power. Please let me know if you have any questions. Anne