HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHANGE ORDER - RFP - 8106 UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (6)SECTION 00950
CHANGE ORDER NO: 01
PROJECT TITLE: Seckner Sewer Bursting
CONTRACTOR: Connell Resources, Inc.
PROJECT NUMBER: 201704 PO NUMBER: 9172437
ORIGINAL BID/RFP NUMBER & NAME: 8106 Utility Infrastructure Construction Services for
Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Capital Improvements
DESCRIPTION:
1. Reason for change: Construction Completed at Reduced Cost (see attached)
2. Description of Change: Reduction in Contract Cost
3. Change in Contract Price: ($48,042.46)
4. Change in Contract Time: None
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE $206,018.00
TOTAL APPROVED CHANGE ORDER $0.00
TOTAL PENDING CHANGE ORDER $0.00
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER ($48,042.46)
TOTAL % OF THIS CHANGE ORDER 23%
TOTAL C.O.% OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT 23%%
ADJUSTED CONTRACT COST $157,975.54
U(Assuming all change orders approved)
ACCEPTED BY: DATE:
Contractor's Representative
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
Pat Johnson, Senior Buyer
SUBMITTED BY: DATE:
Owen Randall, Chief Engineer & Project Manager
APPROVED BY: DATE:
Matt Fater, Water Engineering and Field Services
Manager
APPROVED BY: DATE:
Gerry Paul, Purchasing Director (over $60,000)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 62CA0C74-7B4C-4A91-B047-987EDFBF2F98
10/5/2017
10/5/2017
10/9/2017
10/12/2017
USeckner Alley Sewer Bursting Project
Reason for Reduction in Contract Cost
The project was originally planned for construction in the spring of 2018 but as we completed
the design phase in the winter of 2017 it became apparent that there would be construction required in
Walnut Street that conflict with Streets Department plans to repave Walnut Street in the fall of 2017.
We were therefore forced to accelerate the replacement of the sewer in Seckner Alley to coincide with
the replacement of the sewer in Walnut Street in the spring of 2017.
We were originally planning a cut and cover replacement of the alley sewer and the cost
estimate was based on that premise. However as we gathered information on the sewer we discovered
that pipe bursting was a preferred option and would only require excavations at the points of the service
connections.
The resulting cost reductions resulting from utilization of pipe bursting were as follows:
• A temporary electrical system to the buildings was not required.
• Reduced bedding material, backfill material, flowfill, and asphalt patching were required.
• Reduction in pavement saw cutting.
• Reduced utility sleeving.
• Only one manhole instead of two required.
• Reduced Mobilization.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 62CA0C74-7B4C-4A91-B047-987EDFBF2F98