HomeMy WebLinkAboutRFP - 8226 ARTHUR DITCH MASTER PLANNING & ALTERNATIVE ANALYSISAddendum 1 – 8226 Arthur Ditch Master Planning & Alternatives Analysis Page 1 of 4
ADDENDUM NO. 1
SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
Description of BID 8226: Arthur Ditch Master Planning & Alternatives Analysis
OPENING DATE: 3:00 PM (Our Clock) February 2, 2016
To all prospective bidders under the specifications and contract documents described above,
the following changes/additions are hereby made and detailed in the following sections of this
addendum:
Exhibit 1 – Questions & Answers
Exhibit 2 – Location Map
Please contact Elliot Dale, Buyer at (970) 221-6777 with any questions regarding this
addendum.
RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY A WRITTEN STATEMENT
ENCLOSED WITH THE BID/QUOTE STATING THAT THIS ADDENDUM HAS BEEN
RECEIVED.
Financial Services
Purchasing Division
215 N. Mason St. 2nd Floor
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6775
970.221.6707
fcgov.com/purchasing
Addendum 1 – 8226 Arthur Ditch Master Planning & Alternatives Analysis Page 2 of 4
EXHIBIT 1 - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
1. Can the City provide a map showing the Arthur Ditch crossing that have been recently
replaced?
Answer: Yes. Please see the attached location map showing crossings that have
been replaced.
2. Can the City provide inspection information for the Arthur Ditch crossings between Wood
Street and Laurel Street? What is the typical dimension of the box?
Answer: The City has elected to provide sufficiency ratings of the crossings only
at this time. The following summarizes the sufficiency ratings of the
crossing within the right of way, excluding the alley crossings:
Bridge Location Sufficiency
Rating General Notes
Wood St./Sycamore St. - REPLACED 2015 - NOT YET
INSPECTED
Cherry St./Sycamore St. Alley 27.8
Cherry St./Grant Ave. 49.6
Grant Ave./Maple St. 70
Maple St./Grant Ave. Alley 71
Maple St./Loomis Ave. 69.8
Loomis Ave./Maple St. 50.8
Loomis Ave./Maple St. Alley 28.8
Maple St./Whitcomb St. Alley 24.8
Whitcomb St./Laporte Ave. Alley 28.8
Laporte Ave./Whitcomb St. (Major) 82.9 REPLACED 2013
Mountain Ave./Sherwood St. - REPLACED 2014 - NOT YET
INSPECTED
Oak St./Mountain Ave. Alley 72
Oak St./Mountain Ave. - REPLACED 2014 - NOT YET
INSPECTED
Olive St./Oak St. Alley 78.8
Olive St./Loomis Ave. - REPLACEMENT UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
Magnolia St./Olive St. 76.7
Whitcomb St./Magnolia St. (Major) 99.9 REPLACED 2010
Canyon Ave./Mulberry St. - REPLACED 2015 - NOT YET
INSPECTED
Canyon Ave./Mulberry St. (In Parking
Lot) -
REPLACED 2015 - NOT YET
INSPECTED
Sherwood St./Mulberry St. (Major) 99.9 REPLACED 2005
Sherwood St./Myrtle St. Alley 71
Myrtle St./Meldrum St. - REPLACED 2014 - NOT YET
INSPECTED
Laurel St./ Myrtle St. Alley 41.8
Addendum 1 – 8226 Arthur Ditch Master Planning & Alternatives Analysis Page 3 of 4
Meldrum St./Laurel St. Alley 41.8
Meldrum St./Laurel St. (Sidewalk
Only) -
ONE-TIME INSPECTION -
NO SR
Laurel St./ Meldrum St. 98.7
Full inspection reports will be provided to the selected consultant after contract
development. The typical dimension of the box is 3.5’ tall by 12’ wide for the sections
that have not been replaced. Replacement sections vary, but typically have a lower
profile and greater width than the original box section.
3. Is the City the primary stakeholder of the Arthur Ditch?
Answer: Yes, the City is the primary stakeholder. However, the City does not
hold a majority of the shares.
4. Should the proposal and subsequent report also address the covered section within
Colorado State University (CSU) south of Laurel Street?
Answer: No. As this section of the ditch is on CSU property, the proposal and
report should focus on the section of the ditch between Wood Street
and Laurel Street.
5. Has this section of the Arthur Ditch received a historical designation, and if not, how will this
be determined? How should the consultant plan to address potential historic significance of
the ditch?
Answer: The project team is not familiar with any type of historical designation
being assigned to the ditch. Typically, this is addressed as part of
construction projects, at specific locations. The consultant shall plan
some level of coordination with the City’s Historic Preservation group
and the Landmark Preservation Commission as part of their scope. The
final report should contain information on how the City can address this
question.
Addendum 1 – 8226 Arthur Ditch Master Planning & Alternatives Analysis Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 2 – LOCATION MAP