HomeMy WebLinkAboutCORRESPONDENCE - RFP - 8331 BRIDGE INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & REPLACEMENT (4)Work Order Form
Official Purchasing Form
Last updated 10/2017
WORK ORDER FORM
PURSUANT TO A MASTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AND
MICHSEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
WORK ORDER NUMBER: BAKER-2-254902200-20
PROJECT TITLE: Bridge Management Support Services
ORIGINAL BID/RFP NUMBER & NAME: 8331 Bridge Inspection, Maintenance,
Repair, and Replacement Program
MASTER AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE: 9/1/2016
WORK ORDER COMMENCEMENT DATE: 2/12/2020
WORK ORDER COMPLETION DATE: 4/15/2020
MAXIMUM FEE: (time and reimbursable direct costs): $13,457.50
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF SERVICES: See attached
Service Provider agrees to perform the services identified above and on the attached forms in
accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein and in the Master Agreement between
the parties. In the event of a conflict between or ambiguity in the terms of the Master Agreement
and this Work Order (including the attached forms) the Master Agreement shall control.
The attached forms consisting of (4) page(s) are hereby accepted and incorporated herein, by
this reference, and Notice to Proceed is hereby given after all parties have signed this document.
SERVICE PROVIDER: Date:
ACCEPTANCE: Date:
REVIEWED: Date:
ACCEPTANCE: Date:
Gerry Paul, Purchasing Director
(if greater than $60,000)
DocuSign Envelope ID: E6B66FCD-BD01-4093-AFD7-FED30764072E
Tom Ritz Regional Practice Lead -Bridge
2/12/2020
2/12/2020
Caleb Feaver Civil Engineer I
Elliot Dale
2/13/2020
Sr Buyer
Exhibit “A”
WORK ORDER FORM
PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AND
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
DATED: February 7, 2020
Work Order No. _______12__________
Purchase Order No. ________________
Project title: Bridge Management Support Services
Commencement Date: February 12, 2020
Completion Date: April 15, 2020
Maximum Fee: $13,457.50 (See Exhibit B attached for Fee Schedule)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The City of Fort Collins collects a tremendous volume of structural condition data through the inspection activities
listed below. We understand the City would like to explore ways to improve their bridge management practices
making better use of the data in their maintenance program. Structural data is currently collected via:
1. Inspection of qualifying structures (major structures with span greater than 20 feet) that are
inspected through the CDOT Off-system Bridge Inspection program, in compliance with the National Bridge
Inspection Standards (NBIS), and
2. Through the inspection of non-qualifying (minor structures) structures that are inspected by Michael
Baker International (MBI) as guided by the same NBIS standards.
The City will soon be adding over 100 pedestrian bridges and other structures (certain of those owned by the Colorado
State University) to their managed inventory, which presents an appropriate time to review their current bridge
management practices. Michael Baker was requested to assist in this review, and to research bridge management
policies of peer government agencies of similar size inventory as the City of Fort Collins.
This work order will be performed under the master agreement for the City’s Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair,
and Replacement Program. Any variations to the depth or scope of activities listed below will be documented and
addressed with a contract amendment, if necessary.
CONTRACT TYPE:
This contract will follow a Time & Materials (not to exceed) contract type.
• All work associated with the scope of work will be based on actual time spent on project tasks.
Current billable rates as defined by labor classification in our 2016 master agreement.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E6B66FCD-BD01-4093-AFD7-FED30764072E
Exhibit A - Work Order Form
Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Program – Bridge Management Support Services
February 2020 2 of 3
TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY:
Michael Baker is the prime design consultant and will be responsible for managing all consultant related activities
for this work order, as authorized and directed by the City. No subconsultants are needed to execute the scope of
work as outlined below.
GUIDELINES AND REFERENCES (CURRENT VERSION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE):
The references listed below will shape work tasks and potential deliverables to the City, while remaining within the
NBIS standards meeting the requirements outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations, 23 CFR 650.307 as applicable.
References will include but not be limited to:
• FHWA Bridge Preservation Guidelines, 2018
• AASHTO – Transportation System Preservation Technical Services Program (TSP 2)
• Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP-21)
• Bridge Inspector’s Reference Manual (Publication No. FHWA NHI 12-049)
• Bridge management policy documents of peer bridge owners
• Michael Baker Inspection Reporting and Database Tool
• Any other applicable documents as approved by the City
SCOPE OF SERVICES
There are two primary elements that will completed as part of this project. It should be noted the scope outlined
below will be executed within a matter of weeks and is not intended to be exhaustive in nature with respect to the
spectrum of bridge management and preservation programs Instead, the scope is designed to quickly gather
information that can be readily understood and incorporated into the City’s planning and budgeting bridge
management.
• Project Administration
• Bridge management support services
I. Project Administration
Upon notice to proceed, Baker will perform project administration duties throughout the length of the task order.
A. The Project Manager (PM) will jointly serve as the primary contact and task lead for all work activities. The
PM will manage staff resources, schedule and budget for the short duration of the work.
B. One single invoice will be provided to the City at the completion of the work. A billing summary and a
progress report for work performed during the billing period will be provided.
C. The PM will ensure all documents will receive a quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) review, in
accordance with Michael Baker Quality Control Plan prior to submittal.
D. The following meetings are anticipated:
• Management practice orientation and task refinement meeting
• Final delivery meeting (expected to include a live presentation of findings and characterization
of future task activities)
II. Bridge Management Support
Task 1 - Review of Current Practice – MBI will collect information on how the City is currently using element level
inspection data, condition rating data, SI&A coding as well as the maintenance recommendations provided by the
two inspection programs noted above. This task is only intended to provide an overview and understanding of the
DocuSign Envelope ID: E6B66FCD-BD01-4093-AFD7-FED30764072E
Exhibit A - Work Order Form
Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Program – Bridge Management Support Services
February 2020 3 of 3
City’s tools and existing policy. This framework will help to focus the asset management information collected in
the following task.
Task 2 - MB understands the City’s future goal to create a more robust program of prioritization, budgeting and
scheduling of bridge asset activities is essential to managing their inventory over the long term. With this in mind,
this task will seek to evaluate Asset Management Programs of Peer Government Agencies as a point of comparison
that might be used in part as justification for improvements to their program.
This activity will collect a discrete level of information intended for use by the City and MBI to improve the planning
of the City’s 2-year bridge budgeting strategy. A select number of peer agencies will be contacted to provide a
comparison of asset management attributes, inputs and priorities as outlined in the questions below:
• Number of bridges in peer agency inventory
• Current and future (or annual escalation) in the level funding
• Percent of funding spent on preservation, maintenance and/or replacement
• Metrics being reported to council, commission or other decision body
• The goals of the bridge management program
• Bridge asset management software utilized
• Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) in the decision-making process for future planning
MBI will also use our national contacts to capture any national tendencies or averages of the same data where
available.
The peer group is expected to include from 2 to 4 of the following:
• City of Lakewood, Grand Junction, Aurora, Greeley, and/or Boulder
• County of Larimer County and/or Boulder County
Supplemental Information to be collected when readily available from the peer:
• Written management preservation & maintenance policies
• Define what analysis modeling tools are driven by the policy and the data
Task 3 – MBI shall compile the information from Tasks1 and 2 and prepare a written summary of findings for the
City. A primary outcome of this work order is to help the City define a maintenance budget for the coming planning
cycle. A final coordination meeting is planned as an interactive tool for discussion purposes and planning of next
steps, if any.
DELIVERABLES
The following is an estimate of the deliverables required for this project. As the project develops, the type and number
of deliverables may vary. Refer to the detailed discussions above for further information. All information shall be
compiled onto a single CD, pdf or zip file and delivered to the City at the end of the project.
A. Project Administration (Ongoing)
• One invoice with a progress report
• Meeting and telephone conversation documentation with peer agencies
• Quality Control review of all project deliverables prior to submittal
SCHEDULE
All work described herein shall be completed by April 15, 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: E6B66FCD-BD01-4093-AFD7-FED30764072E
Description:
Bridge Management Support Services
TOTAL HOURS Rate FEE
10 $ 2,200.00
90 $ 11,085.00
100 $ 13,285.00
For Reference Only:
Group Manager 17 $ 220.00 $3,740.00
Structural/Civil Engineer II 83 $ 115.00 $9,545.00
$0.00
$0.00
100 $13,285.00
Copies & Plotting (B&W) (1,800 x $0.05) -- $0.00
Mileage (2 Trips x 150 mi x $0.575 / mi) -- $172.50
--
--
-- $172.50
None $0.00
$0.00
Fee
$13,457.50
Project Administration & Meetings
Bridge Management Support Tasks 1 to 3
WORK ORDER
TOTAL
Subtotal
Cost Per
Staff
Member
Cost Per
Major
Tasks
$13,285 + $172
=
Exhibit "B"
LABOR
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: (Approximate)
SUBCONSULTANTS:
Task Order 12 Fee Summary
for
Michael Baker International, Inc.
City of Fort Collins
Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Program
Subtotal
Subtotal
PRIMARY DESIGN TASK ELEMENTS
Subtotal
2/10/2020 1 of 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: E6B66FCD-BD01-4093-AFD7-FED30764072E