Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCORRESPONDENCE - PURCHASE ORDER - 9135700ACORN® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE �./ DDD 10/16/16/201313 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Greyling Insurance Brokerage 450 Northridge Parkway Suite 102 Atlanta GA 30350 CONTACT NAME: 1 Jerry NO Ola PHONE (770) 552-422$ q/C No: (866)550-4082 ADDRESS:7erry.noyola@greyling.com INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC N INSURER A National Union Fire Ins. Co. 19445 INSURED Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 33068 Raleigh NC 27636 INSURERB:COmmerce & Industry Insurance 19410 INSURERCNew Hampshire Insurance Company 3841 INswRERD 19437 NSURERE: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:13-14 (Kimley LuAnn) REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY:THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, INSR LTR rypE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF IMMIDDNYYYI POLICY EXP IMM1DDNYYYILIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S 1,000,000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE OX OCCUR 3L 9645227 /1/2013 4/1/2014 DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 500,000 MED EXP(Any one person) S 25,000 PERSONAL B ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 X Contractual Liability GENERAL AGGREGATE S 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 POLICY X PRO X LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident 5 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ A ANY AUTO ALLOWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOSHIRED 4982985 4/1/2013 4/1/2014 Ix BODILY INJURY(Peracadenq $ PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ AUTOS X NON -OWNED AUTOS X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000 AGGREGATE S 5,000,000 B EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE DED I X I RETENTIONS 10,00C S BE 016395110 4/1/2013 4/1/2014 C WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y I NI ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) NIA C 018112556 4/1/2013 4/1/2014 X WC STATUS 111- ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYE $ 1,000,000 If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,0 D Professional Liability 016017332 2/1/2012 /l/2014 Per Claim $2,000,000 Aggregate $2 , 000 , 000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, If more space is required) Re: LDB - TOD Parking Study for the City of Fort Collins. The City of Fort Collins is named as an Additional Insured on the above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation & professional liability. Should any of the above described policies be cancelled by the issuing insurer before the expiration date thereof, 30 days written notice (except 10 days for nonpayment of premium) to the Certificate Holder named below will be provided. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Fort Collins ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Purchasing Division 215 North Mason AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 David Collings/JERKY I_CK�] :7 �i'�iiZli D7I�F'11 n 19RR-2010 ACORr) rOPPOPATInN All rinhtc racorvorl INS025(2n1m5101 Tha Arnpr) noma and Innn arc ranicfararl marlrc of Annimn " "�t'Colpns CIN of Fort Collins. CO Transit-Orlented Development(TODI Parking Studv Overview ROIe: PM CommEk fnaaaemmt TKM1n el support GrapMn Cleeitat &P earcM1 77777 Protect SWM: 1..nests 9urns Th. Salesbee Group Sandra Slid MHAstalf I(HAStaff Hourly Ratge: 5335 Sips sips 585 $65 Task 1 Work Plan and gonadal. Meet with the selected consultant (IGmley-Horn and Associates, Inc.) to resew prefiminary work pees end Estimated sees By Task: project schedule . The project shM be competed in time to adopt new parking reguiremenl prior to the September 13, 2014 expration. Discuss the methodologies for evaluating Parkinquiremeg mnet and parking 16 33 za demand mitigation measures in the TOD Overlay Zone for commercial, mull and mixed -use housing (wi1ll a atudentoriented h0uiing emphasis). Task 2: Existing Conditions Review Obtain and review information on ays9ng parking requirement regulated. This will she involve a renew of related zoning and development policies. Review parking requirements and design standards and compare rkin been to pag industry standards. Review policies regarding reduction in the required number of spaces based on shared parking models, TOD area plans including Midtown Plan, Downtown Plan, and Parking Plan, 8 6 s zp Colorado State Universal parking strategy, multimodel options and accession parking requirements. Review recent development proposal. Review and Wassess existing and panned public Uardi ahemrows transportation programs, and non.vehicular infrastructure (i.e. hake lanes, hake uses, sidewalks etc... ). CM staff has much of the Information already complex. Task 3: Rardlow Consistency With Parking Strategic Plan Place are renew from Task 2 within the context of the overall Parking Strategic Plan and goal of creating a comprehensive and integrated development related parking and access management strategy for the ". 35 35 Consider such related Interval, as parking feein-rem programs, parking Impact fees, on -street paid parking. resixennp parking perral program etc. Task 4: Bear Practices Review Identify a set of peer cNes for zoning analyee purposes wen an emphasis on regional/Coloodo..'drawn Conduct a compamtive analysis of peer city zoning requirements to identify, best fractions, parking demand 10 15 xs structure and ranges of parking requiremenus requirements by land e variables. marginal measures, parkingstrategies, Spe ificeliylook at peer class as they have experienced transition to a fully functional TOD district Identify preliminary alternative options for parking requirements. 3p 30 Sp Task 6: Public Involvement Conduct a pubic involvement process to prevent are resins of the preliminary parking system analysis, present overview of current panting zoning requiremenb and rdulb of peer cM reviei discuss community panting p4 33 a < as zoning Issues, discuss parking as a potential economic development strategy, discuss Community development gone, and present alternative parking requirement options. Talk 7: Draft Final Rd ...... options Based on input received and analysis conducted submit a draft report with recommended changes to parking requirement and zoning regulapons. This report should Include dreads and methodology for appying and enevnng parking impact studies, development -related panting fees and parking demand reduction methods. po 30 a a sx The recommendations wii be presented to the Penang Advisory Board, Planning and Zoning Board, and Cry Counts. Total be, Pee unit Costa fat. Mof Tripe Fat, persons par Trip fit. Inunre per Trip Havel per NI,h1 �aa® Meals personal, per Day Alpert 1, isles par pay �aa ®aa0 ®aa� City of Fort Collins Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) Parking Study Overview Project Manager: Seth Lorson, City Planner Planning, Development and Transportation Services Current Planning 281 North College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/CurTentp/anning Project Team: Randy Hensley, Parking Services & Transportation Budget Manager Timothy Wilder, Transfort Service Development Manager Aaron Iverson, Senior Transportation Planner Tom Leeson, Redevelopment Program Manager Chris Banister, IT Financial and Policy Manager Sponsor: Laurie Kadrich, Community Development and Neighborhood Services Director Background: The Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay Zone primarily consists of the commercial districts in the College Avenue and Mason Street Corridors, Downtown and the CSU Campus areas. The purpose of the TOD Overlay Zone is to encourage transit - supported, compact, walkable infill and redevelopment projects. Adopted in 2006-07 the TOD Overlay Zone standards removed minimum parking requirements for mixed -use and multi -family dwellings. The intent was to incentivize redevelopment on challenging infill sites, show commitment to the MAX Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) investment, and to encourage urban densities as a result of the Growth Management Area (GMA). The amount of parking was expected to be driven by market demand, balancing the need to provide adequate parking as an amenity, with the constraints of maximizing development potential on difficult infill sites. Problem Statement: In 2013, as development activity increased in the TOD Overlay Zone, the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council expressed concerns with an increasing number of multi -family and mixed -use housing (with a student -oriented housing emphasis). The concerns include a perceived lack of development -provided parking spaces in relation to the parking demand they are generating and, in turn, potentially leading to spill -over parking into adjacent neighborhoods. Concerns have also been expressed about the need for parking structures to accommodate the envisioned density. The City has the ability to require additional parking as it relates to neighborhood compatibility, however the tools to determine the parking demand are not in place and thus the City does not have an objective measure to base such a requirement. Fueled by these concerns, the City Council adopted a "stop -gap" ordinance (Ord. 121, 2013) requiring minimum parking in the TOD Overlay Zone. The new minimum requirement is 70% of the TOD Parking Study Overview October 8, 2013 existing standard with an alternative compliance element that permits a parking impact study to show a reduction in parking demand. The ordinance will expire on September 13, 2014, during which time the City, with the assistance of an expert consultant, are conducting a TOD Overlay Zone Parking Study resulting in a plan to implement permanent comprehensive parking requirements based on parking demand information and best practices. Project Objectives: 1. Implement parking standards in the Land Use Code for multi -family and mixed -use residential and commercial development in the TOD Overlay Zone. a. Ensure parking standards are in conformance with the community vision as outlined in City Plan, the Parking Plan, the Transportation Master Plan and the Mason Corridor Plan, in regards to transit -oriented development and neighborhood compatibility. b. Explore a comprehensive approach to TOD Overlay Zone parking requirements. c. Base standards on data collected and best practices for a community the size of Fort Collins. 2. Engage community stakeholders, specifically residents and business owners in and adjacent to the TOD Overlay Zone and the Fort Collins Parking Advisory Board, through thorough outreach presenting information gathered, institutionally accepted best practices, and alternative options. 3. Establish a policy foundation for parking in the TOD Overlay Zone as an amendment to the existing Parking Plan. 4. Evaluate a possible parking impact fee or parking fee -in -lieu. Project Scope: Task 1: Work Plan and Schedule Meet with the selected consultant (Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.) to review preliminary work plan and project schedule. The project shall be completed in time to adopt new parking requirements prior to the September 13, 2014 expiration. Discuss the methodologies for evaluating parking requirements and parking demand mitigation measures in the TOD Overlay Zone for commercial, multi -family and mixed -use housing (with a student -oriented housing emphasis). Task 2: Existing Conditions Review Obtain and review information on existing parking requirement regulations. This will also involve a review of related zoning and development policies. Review parking requirements and design standards and compare both to parking industry standards. Review policies regarding reduction in the required number of spaces based on shared parking models, TOD area plans including Midtown Plan, Downtown Plan, and Parking Plan, Colorado State University's parking strategy, multi -model options and accessible parking requirements. Review recent development proposals. Review and assess existing and planned public transit, alternative transportation programs, and non -vehicular infrastructure (i.e. bike lanes, bike trails, sidewalks etc...). City staff has much of this information already compiled. Task 3: Review Consistency with Parking Strategic Plan 2 TOD Parking Study Overview October 8, 2013 Place the review from Task 2 within the context of the overall Parking Strategic Plan and goal of creating a comprehensive and integrated development -related parking and access management strategy for the City. Consider such related initiatives as parking fee -in -lieu programs, parking impact fees, on -street paid parking, residential parking permit program etc. Task 4: Best Practices Review Identify a set of peer cities for zoning analysis purposes with an emphasis on regional/Colorado comparatives. Conduct a comparative analysis of peer city zoning requirements to identify best practices, parking demand mitigation measures, parking structure strategies, and ranges of parking requirements by land use variables. Specifically look at peer cities as they have experienced transition to a fully functional TOD district. Task 5: Alternatives Development Identify preliminary alternative options for parking requirements. This will most likely include: a. No changes to current requirements. b. Minimum parking requirements with an alternative compliance based on a parking impact study. c. Parking requirements based on a parking impact study, with a development size threshold. d. Utilize a parking demand model to determine a dynamic parking requirement that responds to transit and infrastructure build -out. e. Payment of a parking impact fee or fee -in -lieu. f. Strategies for less surface parking and more structured parking. g. Any other innovations or strategies not mentioned above. h. A combination of the above options. Task 6: Public Involvement Conduct a public involvement process to present the results of the preliminary parking system analysis, present overview of current parking zoning requirements and results of peer city review, discuss community parking zoning issues, discuss parking as a potential economic development strategy, discuss community development goals, and present alternative parking requirement options. Task 7: Draft Final Recommendations Based on input received and analysis conducted submit a draft report with recommended changes to parking requirement and zoning regulations. This report should include criteria and methodology for applying and reviewing parking impact studies, development -related parking fees and parking demand reduction methods. The recommendations will be presented to the Parking Advisory Board, Planning and Zoning Board, and City Council. Task 8: Final Plan (CITY STAFF ONLY) Update the Parking Plan with information and recommendations from the TOD Overlay Parking Study. Task 9: Implementation (CITY STAFF ONLY) Draft an ordinance to implement recommendations into the Land Use Code. Attachments: 3 TOD Parking Study Overview October 8, 2013 Map of TOD Overlay Zone