Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHANGE ORDER - RFP - 7390 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR MAX BRT (4)0 CHANGE ORDER NO. 03 PROJECT TITLE: Mason Corridor- MAX BRT CONTRACTOR: CH2M HILL, Inc PROJECT NUMBER: 7390 PURCHASE ORDER NO.: 9124400 (Closed) 9125602(Active) DESCRIPTION: Construction Management Services for MAX BRT 1. Reason for change: This change order primarily adds scope and staff to support the preparation of a Startup and Testing Plan, with associated detailed test procedures for the MAX BRT project. Additionally, the change deletes scope for CH2M HILL to perform Noxious Weed Surveys during the 2013 & 2014 construction season (added in Change Order No. 1), and adds scope for CH2M HILL to prepare an Environmental Revaluation for certain aspects of the project. 2. Description of Change: The changes included in this contract are summarized below and described on the attached change order summary form. 1. Add scope, personnel and budget to develop a Startup and Testing Plan for the project 2. Swap Environmental Scope from Noxious Weeds to an Environmental Revaluation, 3. Change in Contract Cost: $391,668.00 4. Change in Contract Time: Ocalendar days for final completion ORIGINAL CONTRACT COST $3,835,369.00 TOTAL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS $73,794.00 TOTAL PENDING CHANGE ORDERS $0.00 TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 391,668.00 TOTAL % OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT, THIS C.O. 10.21 % TOTAL % OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT, ALL C.O.'S 12.14% ADJUSTED CONTRACT COST (Assurninodclange approved) $4,300,831.00 ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 30-May-13 CH2M HILL Representat i APPROVED BY: DATE: i ' ( W 1J City Project Manager APPROVED BY: '' i DATE: City Engineer APPROVED BY: / DATE: Purchasing Agent over $60,000' a: City Clerk Architect Contractor Engineer Project File Purchasing System for Award Management Page 1 of 1 Search Results Current Search Terms: ch2m* hill* (Your search for "ch2m* hill*" returned the following results... Entity FLUOR/CH2M HILL Status: Active0 DUNS: 614884406 CAGE Code: 49YE6 Vieew.Details�.... Has Active Exclusion?: No DoDAAC: Entity IAP-CH21M HILL SERVICES LLC Status: Active G DUNS: 078394123 CAGE Code: 6NK82 -Vievu Details Has Active Exclusion?: No DoDAAC: Entity CDM CH2M HILL A JOINT VENTURE Status: Activee DUNS: 962176009 CAGE Code: 61U18 View Details Has Active Exclusion?: No DoDAAC: Entity KUNWON-CH2M HILL PMC, LLC Status: Active DUNS: 631055126 NCAGE Code: 11-39F —View Has Active Active Exclusion?: No DoDAAC: Entity CH2M HLL/PARSONS A JOINT VENTR Status: Active(] DUNS: 142562169 CAGE Code: 3QGH3 ..-ViewDetails Has Active Exclusion?: No DoDAAC: - Entity AGVIQ-CH2M HILL JOINT VENTURE III Status: Active G* DUNS: 786579537 CAGE Code: 4MCD4 - View Details_ Has Active Exclusion?: No DoDAAC: En[ity AGVIQ-CH2M HILL JOINT VENTURE I Status: Active CD DUNS: 126109169 Has Active Exclusion?: No CAGE Code: DoDAAC: 3D6Z1 rView Details .y SAM I System for Award Management 1.0 Note to all Users: This is a Federal Government computer system. Use of this system constitutes consent to monitoring at all times. IBM v1.1016.20130614-1637 1 a �USA.gs https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/?portal:componentld=8db509l l -803 7-43 be-8794... 6/25/2013 Title: Change Order 3 CH2M Hill MAX BRT Date: 6-25-13 CONTRACT CHECKLIST FOR NON-COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS (SOLE SOURCE) Checklist Item Contract File Comments Location 7) Independent Cost Estimate The City made and documented an YES independent cost estimate before receipt of proposals. 10) Unnecessary Experience and Excessive Bonding Unnecessary experience and excessive NO bonding requirements were not included in this solicitation or contract documents. 11) Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) If there is an apparent or potential OCI the solicitation contains provisions to eliminate or mitigate the conflict (e.g. by inserting a clause NO that prohibits the contractor from competing for the follow-on contract to the current design or research contact) and OCI Certification is submitted by the contractor. 12) Arbitrary Action There was no arbitrary action in the procurement process. (An example of arbitrary action is when award is made to NO other than the contractor who most satisfied all the City requirements as specified in the solicitation and as evaluated by staff. 13) Brand Name Restrictions Brand Name or Equal. When it is impractical or uneconomical to provide a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements of the property to be acquired, a "brand name or equal" description may be used to define the performance or other salient characteristics of a specific type of property. The City must identify the salient characteristics of the named brand that NO offerors must provide. When using a "brand name" specification, the City does not need to reverse -engineer a complicated part to identify precise measurements or specifications in order to describe its salient characteristics. FT A's "Best Practices Procurement Manual," (BPPM) contains additional information on preparation of specifications including examples with specific language. 14) Geographic Preferences The solicitation contains no in -State or local NO geographic preference except where Federal statutes mandate or encourage them. 15) Contract Term Limitation The contract period of performance for rolling stock and replacement parts does not exceed five (5) years inclusive of options without prior NA written FTA approval. For all other types of contracts, the procurement file contains evidence that the contract term is based on sound business judgment. 18) Award to Responsible Contractor The City made a determination that it was awarding to a responsible contractor considering such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record 1. Y of past performance, and financial and technical resources. 2. Y 1. Appropriate Financial, equipment, facility 3. Y and personnel. (Y/N) 4 Y 2. Ability to meet delivery schedule. (Y/N) 5. Y 3. Satisfactory period of performance. (Y/N) 4. Satisfactory record of integrity, not on declined or suspended listings. (Y/N) 5. Receipt of all necessary data from vendor. (Y/N) 19) Sound and Complete Agreement This contract is a sound and complete agreement. In addition, it includes remedies YES CHANGE ORDER for breach of contract and provisions covering termination for cause and convenience. 24) Clear, Accurate, and Complete Specification A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchased description was YES available and included any specifications and pertinent attachments which define the items or services sought in order for the bidder to properly respond. 38) Sole Source if other Award is Infeasible The contract file contains documentation that award of a contract was infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids, or competitive proposals and at least one of the following circumstances applies: (1) The item was available only from a single source. (Verify prices are no higher than price for such item by likely customers.) CHANGE ORDER (2) Public exigency for the requirement did CONSULTANT IS CH2MHILL not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation. (3) An emergency for the requirement did not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation. (4) The FT A authorized noncompetitive negotiations. (5) Competition was determined inadequate after solicitation of a number of sources. 39) Cost Analysis Required Cost analysis and profit negations were performed (initial award and modifications) And documented for price reasonableness YES was established on the basis of a catalog or market price of a commercial product sold in substantial quantities to the general public or on the basis of prices set by law or regulation. 40) Evaluation of Options The option quantities or periods contained in the contractor's bid or offer were evaluated in order to determine contract award. (To be NA eligible for Federal funding, options must be evaluated as part of the price evaluation of offers, or must be treated as sole source awards. 42) Written Record of Procurement History The file contains records detailing the history of this procurement. At a minimum, these YES ORIGINALLY SELECTED records include: BY RFP PROCESS (1) the rationale for the method of CONSULTANT HAS BEEN procurement, RESPONSIVE (2) Selection of contract type, (3) reasons for contractor selection or rejection, and 4 the basis for the contract price. 43) Exercise of Options The grantee exercised an option on this contract adhering to the terms and conditions of the option stated in the contract and determined that the option price was better NO than prices available in the market or that the option was a more advantageous offer at the time the option was exercised. If an option was not exercised under this contract, check NA. 44) Out of Scope Changes The grantee amended this contract outside the scope of the original contract. The YES, THE WORK IS OUTSIDE amendment was treated as a sole source THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT procurement (complying with the FTA requirements for a justification, cost analysis and profit negotiation). 45) Advance Payment Provisions The contractor did not receive an advance payment utilizing FTA funds and the contract NO does not contain advance payment provisions or, if it did, prior written concurrence was obtained from FTA. 46) Progress Payment Provisions The contract contains progress payments based on costs incurred (as opposed to percent of completion) and the contract contains a provision giving the grantee title to YES property (materials, work in progress, and finished goods) for which progress payments are made. The contract may contain other security in lieu of obtaining title. 47) Time and Materials Contracts This is a time and materials contract; the grantee determined that no other type of NO contract is suitable; and the contract specifies a ceiling rice. 48) Cost Plus Percentage of Cost This is not a cost plus a percentage of cost NO type contract. 49) Liquidated Damages Provisions This contract contains liquidated damages provisions and the assessment for damages NO is specified in the contract at a specific rate per day for each day of overrun in contract time. 50) Piggybacking 1) The file contains: Assignability provisions. NO 2) The procurement file contains: Price reasonableness determination. 56) Clauses This contract contains the appropriate FTA YES required clauses. Excluded Parties Search EPS run and include in the file. YES ma fi.. CHANGE ORDER NO.3 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Project: Construction Manager for MAX BRT Project Project No. 7390 (CEI project q 457230) Date: May 28, 2013 Description of Change: MAX Field Construction Office 3000 South College Ave., Suite 201 Fort Collins, CO 80526 fcgov.com/maxconstruction This change order primarily adds scope and staff to support the preparation of a Startup and Testing Plan, with associated detailed test procedures for the MAX BRT project. Additionally, the change deletes scope for CH2M HILL to perform Noxious Weed Surveys during the 2013 & 2014 construction season (added in Change Order No. 1), and adds scope for CH2M HILL to prepare an Environmental Revaluation for certain aspects of the project. Scope Adiustments Develop Startup and Testing Plan with Associated Detailed Test Procedures Consulting Services The purpose of this scope of work is to identify the tasks CH2M HILL will perform in assisting Transfort in the startup and testing of the MAX BRT System. The goal of this effort are to assist Transfort in demonstrating to the FTA the MAX BRT system is ready to safely and securely begin passenger service by the Revenue Service Date (RSD) identified in the PCGA. CH2M HILL will perform the following general activities in support of this goal: 1. Facilitate/assist in the development of a Startup and Testing Plan and schedule for the MAX BRT that meets FTA requirements 2. Facilitate/assist in the development of detailed System Startup Test Procedures for the MAX BRT 3. Facilitate/assist in the oversight and documentation of startup tests for the MAX BRT 4. Facilitate/assist in the updating of Transfort Operating Procedures as needed for the MAX BRT 5. Facilitate/assist in the development of training procedures as needed for the MAX BRT 6. Facilitate/assist in the preparation of reports or other documents for the FTA Task A - Develop Startup and Testing Plan/Schedule - The Certifiable Items List (CIL) prepared by This task will consist of coordinating with appropriate staff from the City and Transfort to develop a Startup and Testing Plan/Schedule that satisfies the FTA's requirements/expectations drawing from the FTA's Oversight Procedure (OP) 54 "Readiness to Enter Revenue Operations Review" with refinements as necessary to fit a Small Starts BRT project. CH2M HILL will perform the following steps to accomplish this task: 1) Meet with Transfort, City, CM Team to develop an outline of the Startup and Testing Plan 2) Review the outline of the Startup and Testing Plan with the FTA/PMOC to gain concurrence on approach prior to preparing the Plan. 3) Write the Startup and Testing Plan; review it with Transfort, City and CM Team. Submit to FTA/PMOC for concurrence. Modify plan as needed. 4) Meet with Transfort, City, CM Team to develop a detailed schedule for startup and testing. Schedule will be integrated into the overall Master Schedule maintained by the CM. 5) Assist Transfort in establishing a Busway Startup and Commissioning Committee to monitor, track and approve the startup activities (attend kickoff meeting). Page 1 of 3 Task B — Develop Detailed System Startup Test Procedures 1) Review contract documents, and meet with Transfort, City, CM Team and contractor personnel to identify existing startup and testing procedures. Work with the various entities to refine those procedures so that they meet FTA requirements. 2) Develop detailed procedures for items not covered by existing procedures. Task C —Oversight and Documentation of Startup Tests 1) Participate in the startup and testing process by: a) Participate in Busway Startup and Commissioning Committee Meetings b) Providing guidance to Transfort on the commissioning and startup activities c) Providing training to inspection staff for witnessing/documenting testing d) On -site witnessing/documentingtesting 2) Update the Document Control Plan written for the MAX BRT Project to incorporate system startup and testing. 3) Maintain records of the startup and testing in the CM Team's document control system. This includes both electronic files on SharePoint and also hardcopy files. The startup and testing records will be turned over to the City when the project goes into revenue service. Task D — Updating of Transfort Operating Procedures 1) Assist Transfort in the updating of Operations Procedures by providing advice and examples from other transit agencies (if examples are available). 2) Review and comment on draft Operations Procedures prepared by Transfort. Task E — Development of Training Procedures 1) Assist Transfort in the development of Operations and Maintenance Training Procedures, including emergency response procedures, by providing advice and examples from other transit agencies (if examples are available). 2) Review and comment on draft Operations and Maintenance Training Procedures prepared by Transfort. 3) Support Transfort in the execution of one Emergency Responder Drill by witnessing and producing documentation resulting from the drill. Task F — Reporting to the FTA 1) Prepare periodic reports for the FTA as outlined in OP 54 2) Participate in meetings with the FTA/PMOC Environmental Support Services In Change Order 1 scope was added for CH2M HILL to provide environmental oversight/monitoring to address the control and transfer of noxious weed material as part of construction and post -construction activities related to the MAX BRT Project. To address that scope CH2M HILL prepared a Noxious Weed Monitoring Plan. Upon review of the plan by the City and the FTA the City determined that it would refine the plan and implement monitoring using City staff. In response to FTA's request for additional information regarding environmental compliance for the Mason Corridor project, The City desires that CH2M HILL prepare an Environmental Re-evaluation for submission to the FTA by the City, and participate in a review meeting with the FTA to discuss comments, if any. The budget originally set aside for Noxious Weed monitoring is to be used for the preparation of the Environmental Re- evaluation. Page 2 of 3 Staffing/LOE Changes Develop Startup and Testing Plan with Associated Detailed Test Procedures CH2M HILL'S startup and testing team will report to Jonathan Spencer as assistant CM and Chair of the Safety & Security Working Group (SSWG). The team will report to the CM (Keith Meyer. CH2M HILL's team of system startup and testing staff consists of Mike Cannel as the technical lead, supported by Eric Scott (Rick) Newton in the preparation of test procedures and other documents. As part of this change the hours for Jonathan Spencer were increased so that he can be on -site during the final stages of project startup and testing in April/May 2014. Environmental Support Services Mandy Wharton, a senior environmental planner from CH2M HILL will lead the development of the Environmental Revaluation. Because the budget originally set aside for Noxious Weed monitoring is to be used for the preparation of the Environmental Re-evaluation there is no change to the LOE for the project. Change in Contract Value: The total net change in the contract value is Three Hundred Ninety One Thousand, Six Hundred Sixty Eight dollars ($391,668.00). Please see attached resource allocation plan that details the distribution of both labor and expenses based on the changes described above. Change in Contract Time: There is no change in contract time associated with this change order. Page 3 of 3 7/1112 8/1/12 9/1/12 30/1/12 11/1/12 12/1/12 1/1/13 2/1/13 3/1/13 4/1/13 S/1/13 6/1/13 7/1/13 8/1/13 I Iprniwi Pr-.1 perlod 1 Period 2 total thru after thru after burdened burdened burdened 9/1/13 10/1/13 11/1/13 12/1/13 1/1/14 2/1/14 3/1/14 4/1/14 5/1/14 4/1/13 4/1/13 total 4/1/13 4/1/13 overhead overhead labor labor CHZM HILL fee labor hours hours hours Dbect $/hr Dlrect f/hr hameoHke fkN iiiillitJ�y�L' �••�����a �ai6��i7�::7FiU:rU3-4E�4:3'l�J�'-E��� Materials Testing Field It Kn�!-YCTL Firm Current Contract HO 1 LABOR COST 171..1 TOTAL fEE TOTAL Can tract Cost CM Servkes CHZM HILL, Inc. 10,077 $ 1,321,%S $ 295,000 $ 1,616,565 $ 173,479 $ 1,790,044 Dtesco 9,367 5 1,166,250 $ 12,000 $ 1,178,250 $ 47,694 $ 1,225,944 LS Gal leas (080 2,807 $ 201,274 $ 35,000 $ 236,274 $ 9,451 $ 245,725 Rock.. (DOE) 1,580 $ 178,540 $ 30,000 $ 208,540 $ 8,342 $ 216,882 subtotal 23,830 $ 2,867,629 $ 372,000 $ 3,239,629 $ 238,966 $ 3,478,595 Ca Testin11 RLThompson 5,529 $ 403,675 $ 4,507 $ 408,182 5 22,386 $ 430,568 total 29,359 $ 3,271,304 $ 376,507 1 $ 3,647,811 1 $ 261,352 $3,909,163 Notes DBE% 13.3% Hours thru Dec 201.2 based on actual invoices CH2M HILL Expenses increased to incWde $15 K allowance for Safety/Security Team Travel Revised Hours Revised Lar ob Revised s Current fee fee ou new or Reduced Staff Time Sub Revised TOTAL Contra, Cost ChanBetran Current Contract 11,669 $ 1,552,442 5 319,M0 $ 173,479 $ 27,705 Add Mike & Rick Increase ton & John $ 2,072,626 $282,582 10,297 $ 1,271,140 $ 12,000 $ 47,694 $ 4,196 Increase Keith, lilt Beau & Lindsay S 1,335,030 $109,086 2,807 $ 201,274 $ 35,000 $ 9,451 $ $ 245,725 $0 1,580 $ 178,540 $ 30,000 $ 8,342 $ $ 216,892 $0 26,352 $ 3,203,396 $ 396,000 5 238,966 $ 31,901 $ 3,870,263 $391.668 5,529 $ 403,675 $ 4,507 $ 22,386 $ $ 430,568 $0 31.281 S 3,607,071 S 400,507 $ 261,352 $ 31701 $4,30Q831 $391,668 $16,400 Travelfor Mike & Rick DBE% 12.0% 1.3�k 7,600 2-months Per Diemforlon $24,000 Additional Expense Fort of Planning, Development & Transportation Engineering Department 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.221.6605 970.221.6378 - fax kgov. cornlengineering Memoianl M To: John Stephen, Senior Buy From: Erika Keeton, Special Projer Engin Date: 6/ 19/2013 Re: CH2M Hill - Cost Analysis and Change Order #3 Justification CH2M Hill requires an additional supplement (CO#3) for the MAX BRT project to include the development of start-up and testing plan schedule, procedures and implementation that relates to the functionality of the entire BRT system. This is a crucial stage of the project that is necessary to finalize the BRT system before it becomes fully operational. These components include, but are not limited to, the electrical system for emergency services, gates, signals, and railroad operations, as well as electrical and communication components for stations and buses. Scope of work will include the development of the startup and testing plan schedule, system startup procedures including oversight and documentation, updating Transfort's current operating procedures to include development of training measures for the MAX BRT system. This scope of work will also include reporting to the FTA as required, and all meetings and administration needed to complete the above mentioned work. This work was originally intended to be completed by Transfort staff, however it has become apparent that the level of effort needed is more than can reasonably be accommodated with existing staffing levels. In addition, the FTA is requiring the preparation of an environmental re-evaluation for the project. Scope of work will also include review and comment process with the FTA, oversight and monitoring, and all associated meetings. The scope of work that was included in Change Order #1 regarding control and transfer of noxious weeds during construction for 2013 and 2014 has been deleted and transferred to City Staff to complete. The budget that was reserved for the noxious weeds will be replaced with the Re-evaluation for environmental oversight and monitoring scope as discussed above as the timeframe and work to be completed are comparable. Due to the replacement of scope, there is not a monetary addition associated with Change Order #3 to include the re-evaluation, and will not be part of this ICE. CH2M Hill is actively managing the construction activities and should be utilized for these particular work efforts for maximum efficiency. CH2M Hill is requesting a supplemental budget increase of $391,668.00 for the start-up and testing scope. I have prepared an Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) also attached, which is slightly higher in cost at $433,606.20. The ICE is based on estimated hours for a 12 of , ^I;_-` Collins month period and is dependent up on staff responsibilities and needs. Rates used in this ICE are from a subcontractor to Michael Baker, Inc (PO #9957149) and have been used in the past as part of this project (see attached). The difference between the ICE and the proposal is due to a variation in hourly rates, as the hours proposed are comparable. Based on my experience, I believe the requested Change Order #2 for the amount of $391,668.00 is reasonable for the anticipated safety, security and administrative work remaining for the construction and testing/startup phase of the BRT project. I recommend approval of this Change Order. Cnyof Oft COltins Independent Cost Estimate Data of Estimate: 4-Mar-13 Contract Type: Existing Contract or PO(V/N): V Description of Goods (A) or Services (B): Provide startup and testing services to the MAX BRT project to ensure cohesiveness between all electrical and communication components for the project Hourly rates were taken from a subcontractor to Michael Baker Inc. contract PON 9957149) and am attached as supporting documentation. I have obtained the following estimate from; Published Price List / Past Pricing (dale) Engineering or Technical Estimate (performed by) Kad Craven Independent Third Party Estimate (performed by) Other (specify) Cost Estimate Details: (Estimate calculated In US Dollars) Cost of Standard Items Product Cost( lea) Cost($/ea) Notes/Data Source Delivered No Freight Total Cost of Services, Repairs, or Non -Standard Items Itemrrask: Materials or Work Description Other Direct Costs Labor Rate ($) Labor Hours Labor Class Allocated Overhead SGBA' Profit TOTAL Construction Project Manager (4 months CQ 15 hrs/wk) $ 135.00 259.8 $ 35 073.00 Assistant Construction Principal 8 months 20 hrshyk $ 75.00 692.8 $ 51,960.00 Field Engineer (4 months @ 45 mstydd $ 82.00 779.4 $ 63,910.80 Sr. Startupf resting Engineer (12 months @ 25 hrstveek) $ 107.00 1299 $ 138993.00 Startuprresting Engineer (12 months Q 40 hmMeek) $ 56.00 2078.4 $ 116,390.40 Admin Staff - (12 months @ 15 ms/week) $ 35.00 779.4 $ 27.279.00 Total $ 433,606.20 Signature of Preparer. r - K n Craven -sw'. e, PROJECT COST WORKSHEET (SPECIFIC RATE OF PAY) Project Number: 7072 Mown Comdor MAX 9P.T Foal Design Location: FM COIIirn-CSD Firm Name: Harhv_ig 8 Associates Inc. Name of Preparer: Dave Stevenson Firm phone No: 72P733.1821 Scope of Work Date: November 24 20M Contract Time TBD Type of Proposal: Specific Rate d Pay ESTIMATED BEGINNING DATE' TBD IA. SPECIFIC RATE OF PAY EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE DIRECT SALARY INDIRECT FEE MULTIPLIER SPECIFIC RATE NAME CLASSIFICATION COSTMOUR COST (%) (%) SIHOUR fah (b) ( ) lot fe) Dyer, Dave A. Sr. Technician 11 s 10700 0 0% 1.OW s 10700 Manson, Ryan E. Sr Technical 5 8200 0 0% I.bond $ 82M HaR.vig, Manvinena L Sr. ErpmnVPr al 5 135.00 0 0% lomo 5 13500 Romani, Konen, TranapenaGon Cngneerl 5 so 00 0 0% 1.0000 5 56.00 Lino, Kathy Sr, Project Ad.,straw 5 70D0 0 0% 1,0000 S 7500 Stevenson. Dave Sr. Project M.,., 5 135.w 0 0% 1.Op00 S 135.w $pear. Larose Adminatntme Coon irator s 35.M 0 0% 1,0000 S 3500 S lh, Danielle St. Ttenunorooion Enrynaar s 101I a 0% 1.0000 5 109.00 Multiplier (d I=11+(b))x ll+fell SpecieRate($/Hcur)=(a)+(axb)+Ia+(axb)lcw (a)x(d) 18. LABOR COSTS SPECIFIC RATE EST. NO, ESTIMATED COST EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE VHOUR OF WORK PER EMPLOYEE NAME CLASSIFICATION (from 1A) HOURS e7 I) Dyer. David A. Sr. Technician it 107 104 10d $11,12800 Hanson, Ryan E. Sr Technician 1 82 280 $22.960.00 Hal Marvirmes L. Sr. Enghmi-Principal 135 40 $5,400,00 Romero, Michael Transportation Engineer 1 56 160 $8,96000 Lends, Kathy Sr. Project Admintstraor 75 0 $000 Stevenson, Dave Sr. Pmil Manager 135 96 $12,9600C Spear, Lanssa Adminis•✓ative Coordinator 35 $0.00 Smm. Danielle Sr. Transportation Engineer 109 96 $10464.00 TOTAL 776 $71872.00 2A. OTHER DIRECT COSTS (In-house Current Unit Rate -billed at cost) ITEM ESTIMATED RATE ESTIMATED UNITS COST Mileage OE5 ' S 'Current federal government rate 2S. OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Outside) SUBTOTAL 50.00 ITEM ESTIMATED RATE UNITS Meas Actual Reasonable Cest- Subject to Slate Fiscal Rules Lodging Actual Reaewlzble Cost -So Vdt to Slate Fiscal Rules Project related actual and masonab:e costs subject to wio' approval of Miscellaneous COOT/PM Mailing and Postage Actual Raasonable Con Deliveries 10 $25.w Postage Acluel Reawnable Cost Reports Actual Reasonable Cost Copies Actual Reazmable Cos, JUCI VIML so GO ODC TOTAL Box Hamvig 8 Assocates, Inc. 7073 Masan Condor MAX BRIT Final Design Foil Co1ns -CSU Paee 1 of 2