HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHANGE ORDER - RFP - 7390 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR MAX BRT (4)0
CHANGE ORDER NO. 03
PROJECT TITLE:
Mason Corridor- MAX BRT
CONTRACTOR:
CH2M HILL, Inc
PROJECT NUMBER:
7390
PURCHASE ORDER NO.:
9124400 (Closed)
9125602(Active)
DESCRIPTION:
Construction Management Services for MAX BRT
1. Reason for change:
This change order primarily adds scope and staff to support the preparation of a Startup and Testing Plan,
with associated detailed test procedures for the MAX BRT project. Additionally, the change deletes scope
for CH2M HILL to perform Noxious Weed Surveys during the 2013 & 2014 construction season (added in
Change Order No. 1), and adds scope for CH2M HILL to prepare an Environmental Revaluation for certain
aspects of the project.
2. Description of Change:
The changes included in this contract are summarized below and described on the attached change order
summary form.
1. Add scope, personnel and budget to develop a Startup and Testing Plan for the project
2. Swap Environmental Scope from Noxious Weeds to an Environmental Revaluation,
3. Change in Contract Cost: $391,668.00
4. Change in Contract Time: Ocalendar days for final completion
ORIGINAL CONTRACT COST
$3,835,369.00
TOTAL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS
$73,794.00
TOTAL PENDING CHANGE ORDERS
$0.00
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER
$ 391,668.00
TOTAL % OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT, THIS C.O.
10.21 %
TOTAL % OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT, ALL C.O.'S
12.14%
ADJUSTED CONTRACT COST
(Assurninodclange
approved)
$4,300,831.00
ACCEPTED BY:
DATE: 30-May-13
CH2M HILL Representat
i
APPROVED BY:
DATE: i ' ( W 1J
City Project Manager
APPROVED BY: '' i
DATE:
City Engineer
APPROVED BY:
/
DATE:
Purchasing Agent over $60,000'
a: City Clerk
Architect
Contractor
Engineer
Project File
Purchasing
System for Award Management
Page 1 of 1
Search Results
Current Search Terms: ch2m* hill*
(Your search for "ch2m* hill*" returned the following results...
Entity FLUOR/CH2M HILL
Status: Active0
DUNS: 614884406
CAGE Code:
49YE6
Vieew.Details�....
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity IAP-CH21M HILL SERVICES LLC
Status: Active G
DUNS: 078394123
CAGE Code:
6NK82
-Vievu Details
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity CDM CH2M HILL A JOINT VENTURE
Status: Activee
DUNS: 962176009
CAGE Code:
61U18
View Details
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity KUNWON-CH2M HILL PMC, LLC
Status: Active
DUNS: 631055126
NCAGE Code:
11-39F
—View
Has Active Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity CH2M HLL/PARSONS A JOINT VENTR
Status: Active(]
DUNS: 142562169
CAGE Code:
3QGH3
..-ViewDetails
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
-
Entity AGVIQ-CH2M HILL JOINT VENTURE III
Status: Active G*
DUNS: 786579537
CAGE Code:
4MCD4
-
View Details_
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
En[ity AGVIQ-CH2M HILL JOINT VENTURE I
Status: Active CD
DUNS: 126109169
Has Active Exclusion?: No
CAGE Code:
DoDAAC:
3D6Z1
rView Details .y
SAM I System for Award Management 1.0
Note to all Users: This is a Federal Government computer system. Use of this
system constitutes consent to monitoring at all times.
IBM v1.1016.20130614-1637
1
a �USA.gs
https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/?portal:componentld=8db509l l -803 7-43 be-8794... 6/25/2013
Title: Change Order 3 CH2M Hill MAX BRT
Date: 6-25-13
CONTRACT CHECKLIST FOR NON-COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS (SOLE SOURCE)
Checklist Item
Contract File
Comments
Location
7) Independent Cost Estimate
The City made and documented an
YES
independent cost estimate before receipt of
proposals.
10) Unnecessary Experience and
Excessive Bonding
Unnecessary experience and excessive
NO
bonding requirements were not included in
this solicitation or contract documents.
11) Organizational Conflict of
Interest (OCI)
If there is an apparent or potential OCI the
solicitation contains provisions to eliminate or
mitigate the conflict (e.g. by inserting a clause
NO
that prohibits the contractor from competing
for the follow-on contract to the current design
or research contact) and OCI Certification is
submitted by the contractor.
12) Arbitrary Action
There was no arbitrary action in the
procurement process. (An example of
arbitrary action is when award is made to
NO
other than the contractor who most satisfied
all the City requirements as specified in the
solicitation and as evaluated by staff.
13) Brand Name Restrictions
Brand Name or Equal. When it is impractical
or uneconomical to provide a clear and
accurate description of the technical
requirements of the property to be acquired, a
"brand name or equal" description may be
used to define the performance or other
salient characteristics of a specific type of
property. The City must identify the salient
characteristics of the named brand that
NO
offerors must provide. When using a "brand
name" specification, the City does not need to
reverse -engineer a complicated part to
identify precise measurements or
specifications in order to describe its salient
characteristics. FT A's "Best Practices
Procurement Manual," (BPPM) contains
additional information on preparation of
specifications including examples with
specific language.
14) Geographic Preferences
The solicitation contains no in -State or local
NO
geographic preference except where Federal
statutes mandate or encourage them.
15) Contract Term Limitation
The contract period of performance for rolling
stock and replacement parts does not exceed
five (5) years inclusive of options without prior
NA
written FTA approval. For all other types of
contracts, the procurement file contains
evidence that the contract term is based on
sound business judgment.
18) Award to Responsible
Contractor
The City made a determination that it was
awarding to a responsible contractor
considering such matters as contractor
integrity, compliance with public policy, record
1. Y
of past performance, and financial and
technical resources.
2. Y
1. Appropriate Financial, equipment, facility
3. Y
and personnel. (Y/N)
4 Y
2. Ability to meet delivery schedule. (Y/N)
5. Y
3. Satisfactory period of performance. (Y/N)
4. Satisfactory record of integrity, not on
declined or suspended listings. (Y/N)
5. Receipt of all necessary data from
vendor. (Y/N)
19) Sound and Complete Agreement
This contract is a sound and complete
agreement. In addition, it includes remedies
YES CHANGE ORDER
for breach of contract and provisions covering
termination for cause and convenience.
24) Clear, Accurate, and Complete
Specification
A complete, adequate, and realistic
specification or purchased description was
YES
available and included any specifications and
pertinent attachments which define the items
or services sought in order for the bidder to
properly respond.
38) Sole Source if other Award is
Infeasible
The contract file contains documentation that
award of a contract was infeasible under
small purchase procedures, sealed bids, or
competitive proposals and at least one
of the following circumstances applies:
(1) The item was available only from a single
source. (Verify prices are no higher than price
for such item by likely customers.)
CHANGE ORDER
(2) Public exigency for the requirement did
CONSULTANT IS CH2MHILL
not permit a delay resulting from a
competitive solicitation.
(3) An emergency for the requirement did not
permit a delay resulting from a competitive
solicitation.
(4) The FT A authorized noncompetitive
negotiations.
(5) Competition was determined inadequate
after solicitation of a number of sources.
39) Cost Analysis Required
Cost analysis and profit negations were
performed (initial award and modifications)
And documented for price reasonableness
YES
was established on the basis of a catalog or
market price of a commercial product sold in
substantial quantities to the general public or
on the basis of prices set by law or regulation.
40) Evaluation of Options
The option quantities or periods contained in
the contractor's bid or offer were evaluated in
order to determine contract award. (To be
NA
eligible for Federal funding, options must be
evaluated as part of the price evaluation of
offers, or must be treated as sole source
awards.
42) Written Record of Procurement
History
The file contains records detailing the history
of this procurement. At a minimum, these
YES ORIGINALLY SELECTED
records include:
BY RFP PROCESS
(1) the rationale for the method of
CONSULTANT HAS BEEN
procurement,
RESPONSIVE
(2) Selection of contract type,
(3) reasons for contractor selection or
rejection, and
4 the basis for the contract price.
43) Exercise of Options
The grantee exercised an option on this
contract adhering to the terms and conditions
of the option stated in the contract and
determined that the option price was better
NO
than prices available in the market or that the
option was a more advantageous offer at the
time the option was exercised.
If an option was not exercised under this
contract, check NA.
44) Out of Scope Changes
The grantee amended this contract outside
the scope of the original contract. The
YES, THE WORK IS OUTSIDE
amendment was treated as a sole source
THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT
procurement (complying with the FTA
requirements for a justification, cost analysis
and profit negotiation).
45) Advance Payment Provisions
The contractor did not receive an advance
payment utilizing FTA funds and the contract
NO
does not contain advance payment provisions
or, if it did, prior written concurrence was
obtained from FTA.
46) Progress Payment Provisions
The contract contains progress payments
based on costs incurred (as opposed to
percent of completion) and the contract
contains a provision giving the grantee title to
YES
property (materials, work in progress, and
finished goods) for which progress payments
are made. The contract may contain other
security in lieu of obtaining title.
47) Time and Materials Contracts
This is a time and materials contract; the
grantee determined that no other type of
NO
contract is suitable; and the contract specifies
a ceiling rice.
48) Cost Plus Percentage of Cost
This is not a cost plus a percentage of cost
NO
type contract.
49) Liquidated Damages Provisions
This contract contains liquidated damages
provisions and the assessment for damages
NO
is specified in the contract at a specific rate
per day for each day of overrun in contract
time.
50) Piggybacking
1) The file contains: Assignability provisions.
NO
2) The procurement file contains: Price
reasonableness determination.
56) Clauses
This contract contains the appropriate FTA
YES
required clauses.
Excluded Parties Search
EPS run and include in the file.
YES
ma fi..
CHANGE ORDER NO.3
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Project: Construction Manager for MAX BRT Project
Project No. 7390 (CEI project q 457230)
Date: May 28, 2013
Description of Change:
MAX Field Construction Office
3000 South College Ave., Suite 201
Fort Collins, CO 80526
fcgov.com/maxconstruction
This change order primarily adds scope and staff to support the preparation of a Startup and Testing Plan, with
associated detailed test procedures for the MAX BRT project. Additionally, the change deletes scope for CH2M
HILL to perform Noxious Weed Surveys during the 2013 & 2014 construction season (added in Change Order No.
1), and adds scope for CH2M HILL to prepare an Environmental Revaluation for certain aspects of the project.
Scope Adiustments
Develop Startup and Testing Plan with Associated Detailed Test Procedures Consulting Services
The purpose of this scope of work is to identify the tasks CH2M HILL will perform in assisting Transfort in the
startup and testing of the MAX BRT System. The goal of this effort are to assist Transfort in demonstrating to the
FTA the MAX BRT system is ready to safely and securely begin passenger service by the Revenue Service Date
(RSD) identified in the PCGA.
CH2M HILL will perform the following general activities in support of this goal:
1. Facilitate/assist in the development of a Startup and Testing Plan and schedule for the MAX BRT that
meets FTA requirements
2. Facilitate/assist in the development of detailed System Startup Test Procedures for the MAX BRT
3. Facilitate/assist in the oversight and documentation of startup tests for the MAX BRT
4. Facilitate/assist in the updating of Transfort Operating Procedures as needed for the MAX BRT
5. Facilitate/assist in the development of training procedures as needed for the MAX BRT
6. Facilitate/assist in the preparation of reports or other documents for the FTA
Task A - Develop Startup and Testing Plan/Schedule - The Certifiable Items List (CIL) prepared by This task will
consist of coordinating with appropriate staff from the City and Transfort to develop a Startup and Testing
Plan/Schedule that satisfies the FTA's requirements/expectations drawing from the FTA's Oversight Procedure
(OP) 54 "Readiness to Enter Revenue Operations Review" with refinements as necessary to fit a Small Starts
BRT project. CH2M HILL will perform the following steps to accomplish this task:
1) Meet with Transfort, City, CM Team to develop an outline of the Startup and Testing Plan
2) Review the outline of the Startup and Testing Plan with the FTA/PMOC to gain concurrence on approach
prior to preparing the Plan.
3) Write the Startup and Testing Plan; review it with Transfort, City and CM Team. Submit to FTA/PMOC for
concurrence. Modify plan as needed.
4) Meet with Transfort, City, CM Team to develop a detailed schedule for startup and testing. Schedule will
be integrated into the overall Master Schedule maintained by the CM.
5) Assist Transfort in establishing a Busway Startup and Commissioning Committee to monitor, track and
approve the startup activities (attend kickoff meeting).
Page 1 of 3
Task B — Develop Detailed System Startup Test Procedures
1) Review contract documents, and meet with Transfort, City, CM Team and contractor personnel to identify
existing startup and testing procedures. Work with the various entities to refine those procedures so that
they meet FTA requirements.
2) Develop detailed procedures for items not covered by existing procedures.
Task C —Oversight and Documentation of Startup Tests
1) Participate in the startup and testing process by:
a) Participate in Busway Startup and Commissioning Committee Meetings
b) Providing guidance to Transfort on the commissioning and startup activities
c) Providing training to inspection staff for witnessing/documenting testing
d) On -site witnessing/documentingtesting
2) Update the Document Control Plan written for the MAX BRT Project to incorporate system startup and
testing.
3) Maintain records of the startup and testing in the CM Team's document control system. This includes
both electronic files on SharePoint and also hardcopy files. The startup and testing records will be turned
over to the City when the project goes into revenue service.
Task D — Updating of Transfort Operating Procedures
1) Assist Transfort in the updating of Operations Procedures by providing advice and examples from other
transit agencies (if examples are available).
2) Review and comment on draft Operations Procedures prepared by Transfort.
Task E — Development of Training Procedures
1) Assist Transfort in the development of Operations and Maintenance Training Procedures, including
emergency response procedures, by providing advice and examples from other transit agencies (if
examples are available).
2) Review and comment on draft Operations and Maintenance Training Procedures prepared by Transfort.
3) Support Transfort in the execution of one Emergency Responder Drill by witnessing and producing
documentation resulting from the drill.
Task F — Reporting to the FTA
1) Prepare periodic reports for the FTA as outlined in OP 54
2) Participate in meetings with the FTA/PMOC
Environmental Support Services
In Change Order 1 scope was added for CH2M HILL to provide environmental oversight/monitoring to address
the control and transfer of noxious weed material as part of construction and post -construction activities
related to the MAX BRT Project. To address that scope CH2M HILL prepared a Noxious Weed Monitoring Plan.
Upon review of the plan by the City and the FTA the City determined that it would refine the plan and
implement monitoring using City staff.
In response to FTA's request for additional information regarding environmental compliance for the Mason
Corridor project, The City desires that CH2M HILL prepare an Environmental Re-evaluation for submission to
the FTA by the City, and participate in a review meeting with the FTA to discuss comments, if any. The budget
originally set aside for Noxious Weed monitoring is to be used for the preparation of the Environmental Re-
evaluation.
Page 2 of 3
Staffing/LOE Changes
Develop Startup and Testing Plan with Associated Detailed Test Procedures
CH2M HILL'S startup and testing team will report to Jonathan Spencer as assistant CM and Chair of the Safety
& Security Working Group (SSWG). The team will report to the CM (Keith Meyer. CH2M HILL's team of system
startup and testing staff consists of Mike Cannel as the technical lead, supported by Eric Scott (Rick) Newton
in the preparation of test procedures and other documents.
As part of this change the hours for Jonathan Spencer were increased so that he can be on -site during the
final stages of project startup and testing in April/May 2014.
Environmental Support Services
Mandy Wharton, a senior environmental planner from CH2M HILL will lead the development of the
Environmental Revaluation. Because the budget originally set aside for Noxious Weed monitoring is to be
used for the preparation of the Environmental Re-evaluation there is no change to the LOE for the project.
Change in Contract Value:
The total net change in the contract value is Three Hundred Ninety One Thousand, Six Hundred Sixty Eight dollars
($391,668.00). Please see attached resource allocation plan that details the distribution of both labor and
expenses based on the changes described above.
Change in Contract Time:
There is no change in contract time associated with this change order.
Page 3 of 3
7/1112 8/1/12 9/1/12 30/1/12 11/1/12 12/1/12 1/1/13 2/1/13 3/1/13 4/1/13 S/1/13 6/1/13 7/1/13 8/1/13
I Iprniwi Pr-.1
perlod 1 Period 2 total
thru after thru after burdened burdened burdened
9/1/13 10/1/13 11/1/13 12/1/13 1/1/14 2/1/14 3/1/14 4/1/14 5/1/14 4/1/13 4/1/13 total 4/1/13 4/1/13 overhead overhead labor labor CHZM HILL fee labor
hours hours hours Dbect $/hr Dlrect f/hr hameoHke fkN
iiiillitJ�y�L'
�••�����a
�ai6��i7�::7FiU:rU3-4E�4:3'l�J�'-E���
Materials Testing Field
It Kn�!-YCTL
Firm
Current Contract
HO 1
LABOR COST
171..1
TOTAL
fEE
TOTAL
Can tract Cost
CM Servkes
CHZM HILL, Inc.
10,077
$ 1,321,%S
$ 295,000
$ 1,616,565
$ 173,479
$ 1,790,044
Dtesco
9,367
5 1,166,250
$ 12,000
$ 1,178,250
$ 47,694
$ 1,225,944
LS Gal leas (080
2,807
$ 201,274
$ 35,000
$ 236,274
$ 9,451
$ 245,725
Rock.. (DOE)
1,580
$ 178,540
$ 30,000
$ 208,540
$ 8,342
$ 216,882
subtotal
23,830
$ 2,867,629
$ 372,000
$ 3,239,629
$ 238,966
$ 3,478,595
Ca Testin11
RLThompson
5,529
$ 403,675
$ 4,507
$ 408,182
5 22,386
$ 430,568
total
29,359
$ 3,271,304
$ 376,507
1 $ 3,647,811
1 $ 261,352
$3,909,163
Notes DBE% 13.3%
Hours thru Dec 201.2 based on actual invoices
CH2M HILL Expenses increased to incWde $15 K allowance for Safety/Security Team Travel
Revised
Hours
Revised
Lar ob
Revised
s
Current fee
fee ou new
or Reduced
Staff Time
Sub
Revised
TOTAL
Contra,
Cost
ChanBetran
Current
Contract
11,669
$ 1,552,442
5 319,M0
$ 173,479
$ 27,705
Add Mike & Rick
Increase ton
& John
$ 2,072,626
$282,582
10,297
$ 1,271,140
$ 12,000
$ 47,694
$ 4,196
Increase Keith, lilt Beau & Lindsay
S 1,335,030
$109,086
2,807
$ 201,274
$ 35,000
$ 9,451
$
$ 245,725
$0
1,580
$ 178,540
$ 30,000
$ 8,342
$
$ 216,892
$0
26,352
$ 3,203,396
$ 396,000
5 238,966
$ 31,901
$ 3,870,263
$391.668
5,529
$ 403,675
$ 4,507
$ 22,386
$
$ 430,568
$0
31.281
S 3,607,071
S 400,507
$ 261,352
$ 31701
$4,30Q831
$391,668
$16,400 Travelfor Mike & Rick DBE% 12.0% 1.3�k
7,600 2-months Per Diemforlon
$24,000 Additional Expense
Fort of
Planning, Development & Transportation
Engineering Department
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.221.6605
970.221.6378 - fax
kgov. cornlengineering
Memoianl M
To: John Stephen, Senior Buy
From: Erika Keeton, Special Projer Engin
Date: 6/ 19/2013
Re: CH2M Hill - Cost Analysis and Change Order #3 Justification
CH2M Hill requires an additional supplement (CO#3) for the MAX BRT project to include the
development of start-up and testing plan schedule, procedures and implementation that relates to the
functionality of the entire BRT system. This is a crucial stage of the project that is necessary to finalize
the BRT system before it becomes fully operational. These components include, but are not limited to,
the electrical system for emergency services, gates, signals, and railroad operations, as well as electrical
and communication components for stations and buses. Scope of work will include the development of
the startup and testing plan schedule, system startup procedures including oversight and documentation,
updating Transfort's current operating procedures to include development of training measures for the
MAX BRT system. This scope of work will also include reporting to the FTA as required, and all
meetings and administration needed to complete the above mentioned work. This work was originally
intended to be completed by Transfort staff, however it has become apparent that the level of effort
needed is more than can reasonably be accommodated with existing staffing levels.
In addition, the FTA is requiring the preparation of an environmental re-evaluation for the project. Scope
of work will also include review and comment process with the FTA, oversight and monitoring, and all
associated meetings.
The scope of work that was included in Change Order #1 regarding control and transfer of noxious weeds
during construction for 2013 and 2014 has been deleted and transferred to City Staff to complete. The
budget that was reserved for the noxious weeds will be replaced with the Re-evaluation for environmental
oversight and monitoring scope as discussed above as the timeframe and work to be completed are
comparable. Due to the replacement of scope, there is not a monetary addition associated with Change
Order #3 to include the re-evaluation, and will not be part of this ICE.
CH2M Hill is actively managing the construction activities and should be utilized for these particular
work efforts for maximum efficiency. CH2M Hill is requesting a supplemental budget increase of
$391,668.00 for the start-up and testing scope. I have prepared an Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) also
attached, which is slightly higher in cost at $433,606.20. The ICE is based on estimated hours for a 12
of
, ^I;_-` Collins
month period and is dependent up on staff responsibilities and needs. Rates used in this ICE are from a
subcontractor to Michael Baker, Inc (PO #9957149) and have been used in the past as part of this project
(see attached). The difference between the ICE and the proposal is due to a variation in hourly rates, as
the hours proposed are comparable.
Based on my experience, I believe the requested Change Order #2 for the amount of $391,668.00 is
reasonable for the anticipated safety, security and administrative work remaining for the construction and
testing/startup phase of the BRT project. I recommend approval of this Change Order.
Cnyof
Oft COltins Independent Cost Estimate
Data of Estimate: 4-Mar-13
Contract Type:
Existing Contract or PO(V/N): V
Description of Goods (A) or Services (B):
Provide startup and testing services to the MAX BRT project to ensure cohesiveness between all electrical and
communication components for the project Hourly rates were taken from a subcontractor to Michael Baker Inc.
contract PON 9957149) and am attached as supporting documentation.
I have obtained the following estimate from;
Published Price List / Past Pricing (dale)
Engineering or Technical Estimate (performed by) Kad Craven
Independent Third Party Estimate (performed by)
Other (specify)
Cost Estimate Details:
(Estimate calculated In US Dollars)
Cost of Standard Items
Product
Cost( lea)
Cost($/ea)
Notes/Data Source
Delivered
No Freight
Total
Cost of Services, Repairs, or Non -Standard Items
Itemrrask:
Materials or Work Description
Other Direct
Costs
Labor
Rate ($)
Labor
Hours
Labor
Class
Allocated
Overhead
SGBA'
Profit
TOTAL
Construction Project Manager (4
months CQ 15 hrs/wk)
$ 135.00
259.8
$ 35 073.00
Assistant Construction Principal
8 months 20 hrshyk
$ 75.00
692.8
$ 51,960.00
Field Engineer (4 months @ 45
mstydd
$ 82.00
779.4
$ 63,910.80
Sr. Startupf resting Engineer (12
months @ 25 hrstveek)
$ 107.00
1299
$ 138993.00
Startuprresting Engineer (12
months Q 40 hmMeek)
$ 56.00
2078.4
$ 116,390.40
Admin Staff - (12 months @ 15
ms/week)
$ 35.00
779.4
$ 27.279.00
Total
$ 433,606.20
Signature of Preparer. r -
K n Craven
-sw'. e,
PROJECT COST WORKSHEET (SPECIFIC RATE OF PAY)
Project Number:
7072 Mown Comdor MAX 9P.T Foal Design
Location:
FM COIIirn-CSD
Firm Name:
Harhv_ig 8 Associates Inc.
Name of Preparer:
Dave Stevenson
Firm phone No:
72P733.1821
Scope of Work Date:
November 24 20M
Contract Time
TBD
Type of Proposal:
Specific Rate d Pay
ESTIMATED BEGINNING DATE'
TBD
IA. SPECIFIC RATE OF PAY
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
DIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT
FEE
MULTIPLIER
SPECIFIC RATE
NAME
CLASSIFICATION
COSTMOUR
COST (%)
(%)
SIHOUR
fah
(b)
( )
lot
fe)
Dyer, Dave A.
Sr. Technician 11
s 10700
0
0%
1.OW
s 10700
Manson, Ryan E.
Sr Technical
5 8200
0
0%
I.bond
$ 82M
HaR.vig, Manvinena L
Sr. ErpmnVPr al
5 135.00
0
0%
lomo
5 13500
Romani, Konen,
TranapenaGon Cngneerl
5 so 00
0
0%
1.0000
5 56.00
Lino, Kathy
Sr, Project Ad.,straw
5 70D0
0
0%
1,0000
S 7500
Stevenson. Dave
Sr. Project M.,.,
5 135.w
0
0%
1.Op00
S 135.w
$pear. Larose
Adminatntme Coon irator
s 35.M
0
0%
1,0000
S 3500
S lh, Danielle
St. Ttenunorooion Enrynaar
s 101I
a
0%
1.0000
5 109.00
Multiplier (d I=11+(b))x ll+fell
SpecieRate($/Hcur)=(a)+(axb)+Ia+(axb)lcw (a)x(d)
18. LABOR COSTS
SPECIFIC RATE
EST. NO,
ESTIMATED COST
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
VHOUR
OF WORK
PER EMPLOYEE
NAME
CLASSIFICATION
(from 1A)
HOURS
e7
I)
Dyer. David A.
Sr. Technician it
107
104 10d
$11,12800
Hanson, Ryan E.
Sr Technician 1
82
280
$22.960.00
Hal Marvirmes L.
Sr. Enghmi-Principal
135
40
$5,400,00
Romero, Michael
Transportation Engineer 1
56
160
$8,96000
Lends, Kathy
Sr. Project Admintstraor
75
0
$000
Stevenson, Dave
Sr. Pmil Manager
135
96
$12,9600C
Spear, Lanssa
Adminis•✓ative Coordinator
35
$0.00
Smm. Danielle
Sr. Transportation Engineer
109
96
$10464.00
TOTAL
776
$71872.00
2A. OTHER DIRECT COSTS (In-house Current Unit Rate -billed at cost)
ITEM ESTIMATED RATE ESTIMATED
UNITS COST
Mileage OE5 ' S
'Current federal government rate
2S. OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Outside)
SUBTOTAL 50.00
ITEM
ESTIMATED RATE
UNITS
Meas
Actual Reasonable Cest- Subject to Slate Fiscal Rules
Lodging
Actual Reaewlzble Cost -So Vdt to Slate Fiscal Rules
Project related actual and masonab:e costs subject to wio' approval of
Miscellaneous
COOT/PM
Mailing and Postage
Actual Raasonable Con
Deliveries
10 $25.w
Postage
Acluel Reawnable Cost
Reports
Actual Reasonable Cost
Copies
Actual Reazmable Cos,
JUCI VIML so GO
ODC TOTAL Box
Hamvig 8 Assocates, Inc.
7073 Masan Condor MAX BRIT Final Design
Foil Co1ns -CSU
Paee 1 of 2