HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHANGE ORDER - RFP - 7390 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR MAX BRT (3)PROJECT TITLE:
CONTRACTOR:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PURCHASE ORDER NO.:
DESCRIPTION:
1. Reason for change:
CHANGE ORDER NO.03
Mason Corridor - MAX BRT
CH2M HILL, Inc
7390
9124400(Closed)
9125602(Active)
Construction Management Services for MAX BRT
This change order primarily adds scope and staff to support the preparation of a Startup and Testing Plan,
with associated detailed test procedures for the MAX BRT project. Additionally, the change deletes scope
for CH2M HILL to perform Noxious Weed Surveys during the 2013 & 2014 construction season (added in
Change Order No. 1), and adds scope for CH2M HILL to prepare an Environmental Revaluation for certain
aspects of the project.
2. Description of Change:
The changes included in this contract are summar¢ed below and described on the attached change order
summary form.
1. Add scope, personnel and budget to develop a Startup and Testing Plan for the project
2. Swap Environmental Scope from Noxious Weeds to an Environmental Revaluation.
3. Change in Contract Cost: $391,668.00
4. Change in Contract Time: Ocalendar days for final completion
TOTAL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS $73,794.00
TOTAL PENDING CHANGE ORDERS $0.00
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 391,668.00
TOTAL % OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT, THIS C.O. 10.21 %
TOTAL % OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT, ALL C.O.'S 12.14%
ADJUSTED CONTRACT COST n _ $4,300,831.00
ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 30-May-13
CH2M HILL Representat 2
APPROVED BY: r DATE: 10 ' l (N e>
City Project Manager
APPROVED BY: '" \ 1 DATE:
City Engineer
APPROVED BY: DATE:
Purchasing Agent over $60,000
u: City Clerk Architect
Contractor Engineer
Project File Purchasing
System for Award Management
Page 1 of 1
Search Results
Current Search Terms: ch2m* hill*
(Your search for "ch2m* hill*" returned the following results...
En[ity FLUOR/CH21M HILL
Status: Activee
DUNS: 614884406
CAGE Code:
49YE6
View Details
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity IAP-CH214 HILL SERVICES LLC
Status: Active 1J
DUNS: 078394123
CAGE Code:
6NK82
- ViewDetails - •.
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity CDM CH21M HILL A JOINT VENTURE
Status: Active Q
DUNS: 9621.76009
CAGE Code:
61U18
`View Details
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity KUNWON-CH21M HILL PMC, LLC
Status: Active �+
DUNS: 631055126
WAGE Code:
1L19F
-il
- View Details -
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity CH21M HLL/PARSONS A JOINT VENTR
Status: Active O+
DUNS: 142S62169
CAGE Code:
3QGH3
View Details
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity AGVIQ-CH2M HILL JOINT VENTURE III
Status: Active �+
DUNS: 786579537
CAGE Code:
4MCD4
View Details
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC:
Entity AGVIQ-CH2M HILL JOINT VENTURE I
Status: ActiveG
DUNS: 126109169
CAGE Code:
3D6Z1
View Details
Has Active Exclusion?: No
DoDAAC;
SAM I System for Award Management 1.0
Note to all Users: This is a Federal Government computer system. Use of this
system constitutes consent to monitoring at all times.
IBM v1.1016.20130614-1637
® `USA.gc
https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/?portal:componentId=8db509l l-8037-43be-8794... 6/25/2013
Title: Change Order 3 CH2M Hill MAX BRT
Date: 6-25-13
CONTRACT CHECKLIST FOR NON-COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS (SOLE SOURCE)
Checklist Item
Contract File
Comments
Location
7) Independent Cost Estimate
The City made and documented an
YES
independent cost estimate before receipt of
proposals.
10) Unnecessary Experience and
Excessive Bonding
Unnecessary experience and excessive
NO
bonding requirements were not included in
this solicitation or contract documents.
11) Organizational Conflict of
Interest (OCI)
If there is an apparent or potential OCI the
solicitation contains provisions to eliminate or
mitigate the conflict (e.g. by inserting a clause
NO
that prohibits the contractor from competing
for the follow-on contract to the current design
or research contact) and OCI Certification is
submitted by the contractor.
12) Arbitrary Action
There was no arbitrary action in the
procurement process. (An example of
arbitrary action is when award is made to
NO
other than the contractor who most satisfied
all the City requirements as specified in the
solicitation and as evaluated by staff.
13) Brand Name Restrictions
Brand Name or Equal. When it is impractical
or uneconomical to provide a clear and
accurate description of the technical
requirements of the property to be acquired, a
"brand name or equal" description may be
used to define the performance or other
salient characteristics of a specific type of
property. The City must identify the salient
characteristics of the named brand that
NO
offerors must provide. When using a "brand
name" specification, the City does not need to
reverse -engineer a complicated part to
identify precise measurements or
specifications in order to describe its salient
characteristics. FT A's "Best Practices
Procurement Manual," (BPPM) contains
additional information on preparation of
specifications including examples with
specific language.
14) Geographic Preferences
The solicitation contains no in -State or local
NO
geographic preference except where Federal
statutes mandate or encourage them.
15) Contract Term Limitation
The contract period of performance for rolling
stock and replacement parts does not exceed
five (5) years inclusive of options without prior
NA
written FTA approval. For all other types of
contracts, the procurement file contains
evidence that the contract term is based on
sound business judgment.
18) Award to Responsible
Contractor
The City made a determination that it was
awarding to a responsible contractor
considering such matters as contractor
integrity, compliance with public policy, record
of past performance, and financial and
1. Y
technical resources.
2. Y
1. Appropriate Financial, equipment, facility
3. Y
and personnel. (Y/N)
4.Y
2. Ability to meet delivery schedule. (Y/N)
5. Y
3. Satisfactory period of performance. (Y/N)
4. Satisfactory record of integrity, not on
declined or suspended listings. (Y/N)
5. Receipt of all necessary data from
vendor. (Y/N)
19) Sound and Complete Agreement
This contract is a sound and complete
agreement. In addition, it includes remedies
YES CHANGE ORDER
for breach of contract and provisions covering
termination for cause and convenience.
24) Clear, Accurate, and Complete
Specification
A complete, adequate, and realistic
specification or purchased description was
YES
available and included any specifications and
pertinent attachments which define the items
or services sought in order for the bidder to
properly respond.
38) Sole Source if other Award is
Infeasible
The contract file contains documentation that
award of a contract was infeasible under
small purchase procedures, sealed bids, or
competitive proposals and at least one
of the following circumstances applies:
(1) The item was available only from a single
source. (Verify prices are no higher than price
for such item by likely customers.)
CHANGE ORDER
(2) Public exigency for the requirement did
CONSULTANT IS CH2MHILL
not permit a delay resulting from a
competitive solicitation.
(3) An emergency for the requirement did not
permit a delay resulting from a competitive
solicitation.
(4) The FT A authorized noncompetitive
negotiations.
(5) Competition was determined inadequate
after solicitation of a number of sources.
39) Cost Analysis Required
Cost analysis and profit negations were
performed (initial award and modifications)
And documented for price reasonableness
YES
was established on the basis of a catalog or
market price of a commercial product sold in
substantial quantities to the general public or
on the basis of prices set by law or regulation.
40) Evaluation of Options
The option quantities or periods contained in
the contractor's bid or offer were evaluated in
order to determine contract award. (To be
NA
eligible for Federal funding, options must be
evaluated as part of the price evaluation of
offers, or must be treated as sole source
awards.
42) Written Record of Procurement
History
The file contains records detailing the history
of this procurement. At a minimum, these
YES ORIGINALLY SELECTED
records include:
BY RFP PROCESS
(1) the rationale for the method of
CONSULTANT HAS BEEN
procurement,
(2) Selection of contract type,
RESPONSIVE
(3) reasons for contractor selection or
rejection, and
4 the basis for the contract price.
43) Exercise of Options
The grantee exercised an option on this
contract adhering to the terms and conditions
of the option stated in the contract and
determined that the option price was better
NO
than prices available in the market or that the
option was a more advantageous offer at the
time the option was exercised.
If an option was not exercised under this
contract, check NA.
44) Out of Scope Changes
The grantee amended this contract outside
the scope of the original contract. The
YES, THE WORK IS OUTSIDE
amendment was treated as a sole source
THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT
procurement (complying with the FTA
requirements for a justification, cost analysis
and profit negotiation).
45) Advance Payment Provisions
The contractor did not receive an advance
payment utilizing FTA funds and the contract
NO
does not contain advance payment provisions
or, if it did, prior written concurrence was
obtained from FTA.
46) Progress Payment Provisions
The contract contains progress payments
based on costs incurred (as opposed to
percent of completion) and the contract
contains a provision giving the grantee title to
YES
property (materials, work in progress, and
finished goods) for which progress payments
are made. The contract may contain other
security in lieu of obtaining title.
47) Time and Materials Contracts
This is a time and materials contract; the
grantee determined that no other type of
NO
contract is suitable; and the contract specifies
a ceiling rice.
48) Cost Plus Percentage of Cost
This is not a cost plus a percentage of cost
NO
type contract.
49) Liquidated Damages Provisions
This contract contains liquidated damages
provisions and the assessment for damages
NO
is specified in the contract at a specific rate
per day for each day of overrun in contract
time.
50) Piggybacking
1) The file contains: Assignability provisions.
NO
2) The procurement file contains: Price
reasonableness determination.
56) Clauses
This contract contains the appropriate FTA
YES
required clauses.
Excluded Parties Search
YES
EPS run and include in the file.
MAX Field Construction Office
3000 South College Ave., Suite 201
Fort Collins, CO 80526
fcgov.com/maxconstruction
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Project: Construction Manager for MAX BRT Project
Project No. 7390 (CEI project # 457230)
Date: May 28, 2013
Description of Change:
This change order primarily adds scope and staff to support the preparation of a Startup and Testing Plan, with
associated detailed test procedures for the MAX BRT project. Additionally, the change deletes scope for CH2M
HILL to perform Noxious Weed Surveys during the 2013 & 2014 construction season (added in Change Order No.
1), and adds scope for CH2M HILL to prepare an Environmental Revaluation for certain aspects of the project.
Scope Adjustments
Develop Startup and Testing Plan with Associated Detailed Test Procedures Consulting Services
The purpose of this scope of work is to identify the tasks CH2M HILL will perform in assisting Transfort in the
startup and testing of the MAX BRT System. The goal of this effort are to assist Transfort in demonstrating to the
FTA the MAX BRT system is ready to safely and securely begin passenger service by the Revenue Service Date
(RSD) identified in the PCGA.
CH2M HILL will perform the following general activities in support of this goal:
1. Facilitate/assist in the development of a Startup and Testing Plan and schedule for the MAX BRT that
meets FTA requirements
2. Facilitate/assist in the development of detailed System Startup Test Procedures for the MAX BRT
3. Facilitate/assist in the oversight and documentation of startup tests for the MAX BRT
4. Facilitate/assist in the updating of Transfort Operating Procedures as needed for the MAX BRT
5. Facilitate/assist in the development of training procedures as needed for the MAX BRT
6. Facilitate/assist in the preparation of reports or other documents for the FTA
Task A - Develop Startup and Testing Plan/Schedule - The Certifiable Items List (CIL) prepared by This task will
consist of coordinating with appropriate staff from the City and Transfort to develop a Startup and Testing
Plan/Schedule that satisfies the FTA's requirements/expectations drawing from the FTA's Oversight Procedure
(OP) 54 "Readiness to Enter Revenue Operations Review' with refinements as necessary to fit a Small Starts
BRT project. CH2M HILL will perform the following steps to accomplish this task:
1) Meet with Transfort, City, CM Team to develop an outline of the Startup and Testing Plan
2) Review the outline of the Startup and Testing Plan with the FTA/PMOC to gain concurrence on approach
prior to preparing the Plan.
3) Write the Startup and Testing Plan; review it with Transfort, City and CM Team. Submit to FTA/PMOCfor
concurrence. Modify plan as needed.
4) Meet with Transfort, City, CM Team to develop a detailed schedule for startup and testing. Schedule will
be integrated into the overall Master Schedule maintained by the CM.
5) Assist Transfort in establishing a Busway Startup and Commissioning Committee to monitor, track and
approve the startup activities (attend kickoff meeting).
Page 1 of 3
Task B — Develop Detailed System Startup Test Procedures
1) Review contract documents, and meet with Transfort, City, CM Team and contractor personnel to identify
existing startup and testing procedures. Work with the various entities to refine those procedures so that
they meet FTA requirements.
2) Develop detailed procedures for items not covered by existing procedures.
Task C —Oversight and Documentation of Startup Tests
1) Participate in the startup and testing process by:
a) Participate in Busway Startup and Commissioning Committee Meetings
b) Providing guidance to Transfort on the commissioning and startup activities
c) Providing training to inspection staff for witnessing/documenting testing
d) On -site witnessing/documentingtesting
2) Update the Document Control Plan written for the MAX BRT Project to incorporate system startup and
testing.
3) Maintain records of the startup and testing in the CM Team's document control system. This includes
both electronic files on SharePoint and also hardcopy files. The startup and testing records will be turned
over to the City when the project goes into revenue service.
Task D — Updating of Transfort Operating Procedures
1) Assist Transfort in the updating of Operations Procedures by providing advice and examples from other
transit agencies (if examples are available).
2) Review and comment on draft Operations Procedures prepared by Transfort.
Task E — Development of Training Procedures
1) Assist Transfort in the development of Operations and Maintenance Training Procedures, including
emergency response procedures, by providing advice and examples from other transit agencies (if
examples are available).
2) Review and comment on draft Operations and Maintenance Training Procedures prepared by Transfort.
3) Support Transfort in the execution of one Emergency Responder Drill by witnessing and producing
documentation resulting from the drill.
Task F — Reporting to the FTA
1) Prepare periodic reports for the FTA as outlined in OP 54
2) Participate in meetings with the FTA/PMOC
Environmental Support Services
In Change Order 1 scope was added for CH2M HILL to provide environmental oversight/monitoring to address
the control and transfer of noxious weed material as part of construction and post -construction activities
related to the MAX BRT Project. To address that scope CH2M HILL prepared a Noxious Weed Monitoring Plan.
Upon review of the plan by the City and the FTA the City determined that it would refine the plan and
implement monitoring using City staff.
In response to FTA's request for additional information regarding environmental compliance for the Mason
Corridor project, The City desires that CH2M HILL prepare an Environmental Re-evaluation for submission to
the FTA by the City, and participate in a review meeting with the FTA to discuss comments, if any. The budget
originally set aside for Noxious Weed monitoring is to be used for the preparation of the Environmental Re-
evaluation.
Page 2 of 3
Staffing/LOE Changes
Develop Startup and Testing Plan with Associated Detailed Test Procedures
CH2M HILL'S startup and testing team will report to Jonathan Spencer as assistant CM and Chair of the Safety
& Security Working Group (SSWG). The team will report to the CM (Keith Meyer. CH2M HILL'S team of system
startup and testing staff consists of Mike Cannel as the technical lead, supported by Eric Scott (Rick) Newton
in the preparation of test procedures and other documents.
As part of this change the hours for Jonathan Spencer were increased so that he can be on -site during the
final stages of project startup and testing in April/May 2014.
Environmental Support Services
Mandy Whorton, a senior environmental planner from CH2M HILL will lead the development of the
Environmental Revaluation. Because the budget originally set aside for Noxious Weed monitoring is to be
used for the preparation of the Environmental Re-evaluation there is no change to the LOE for the project.
Change in Contract Value:
The total net change in the contract value is Three Hundred Ninety One Thousand, Six Hundred Sixty Eight dollars
($391,668.00). Please see attached resource allocation plan that details the distribution of both labor and
expenses based on the changes described above.
Change in Contract Time:
There is no change in contract time associated with this change order.
Page 3 of 3
Mason StaNn9 plan Rerlo41 frlod 2 toM
MN a0r Time eRr Wrdrmal Wrderrd Wrdened
)/I/12 B/I/12 9/1/12 1011/12 11/1/11 12/1/12 1/1/13 2/1/13 3/1/13 412/13 S/1/13 6/1/13 7/l/13 0/l/13 9/1/13 10/1/13 11/1/13 12/1/13 l/1/l4 I/1/14 3/1/14 4/1/14 5/1/14 4/1113 4/1/13 a4m 4/1113 4/1/13 olrrbead oeemead IaWr WWr CH2M MU fa Iabr
NrnlCOnbe[t
HWRS
LOLIIM ST
WEHSES
TWA1
FEE
TOTAL
Cmtrect Coss
CM Servkos
CH2M HILL 1.,
10,0]]
$ 1,321,565
295,OW
1,616.565
173,479
$ 11190,oce
D'rtesN
9,36]
$ 1,166,250
$ 32,000
$ 1,1)8,250
$ d1,691
$ 1,225,9aa
BGaIk os DBE
2,60]
$ 201,274
$ 35,0W
$ M,214
$ 9,451
$ 36,]25
RoctroIKDBEJ
1,580
$ 178,540
$ 3Q000
$ NM,560
$ 8,312
$ 216,802
suModl
23A30
2,867,629
$ 3) M
3 9 19
i3B 6
3472,595
QATlatn
al.TWmfson
5,529
f 303,675
$ d,50)
$ WB, 142
s 22,386
$ 43Q360
total
29,359
$ 3,2)1,304
$ 3)f,S01
$ 3,M)A31
$ 161,351
$3M9.1631
Ilolr DBf% 133R
Hour tMu Dec 201t based on actual immias
CHIM HILL U"mas imaeascd to imWe $15 K allorarrce for Safety/Securm] Team Traeal
ReNW
Hwn
Reulsrl
labor
ReMaed
ses
Currrn Fee
Fee on new
or led."
SMHTlm.•
Sub
ReMsed
TOTAL
Contract
Con
Uan6e hum
Current
Centraet
11.669
1552,442
S 31vr.r,
$ 173,479
$ 2),]05
Add Mbe 6 Rkk
lmmna lun
6 John
2A)2,626
$262,W
10,297
$1,271,140
$ 12,000
$ 47,694
$ 4,1%
Ines. Kedb, IRK
Beau B Li
$1,33i,030
$109,006
2,W7
$ WI,2I4
$ 35,000
$ 9,451
$
S 243,)25
50
I'M
$ 179,SW
$ 30.=
$ B,362
$
$ 216,662
$0
26,332
$ 3,203,396
$ 3%,M
$ 230A66
S 31 1
$ 3A70,263
$391,6W
5,52915
403,675
$ 4.W7
$ 22,386
$
1
1$ M,3itl
SQ
31A01
1 $ 3,60]A]3
S 4W,501
$ 261,352
$ 31,901
1
1 $4.WQA311
$391,668
SM.41M T.Ifor MiIe BRkK DBE% 1 12.0% E3^.
7,6W 2maulMFer Dkmforlon
$24,= Additionalb,amae
City of
Fort Collins
Planning, Development & Transportation
Engineering Department
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580
970.221.6605
970.221.6378 - fax
kgov. com/engineering
Memorandum
To: John Stephen, Senior Buyer
From: Erika Keeton, Special Proj s Engm
Date: 6/19/2013
Re: CH2M Hill - Cost Analysis and Change Order #3 Justification
CH2M Hill requires an additional supplement (CO#3) for the MAX BRT project to include the
development of start-up and testing plan schedule, procedures and implementation that relates to the
functionality of the entire BRT system. This is a crucial stage of the project that is necessary to finalize
the BRT system before it becomes fully operational. These components include, but are not limited to,
the electrical system for emergency services, gates, signals, and railroad operations, as well as electrical
and communication components for stations and buses. Scope of work will include the development of
the startup and testing plan schedule, system startup procedures including oversight and documentation,
updating Transfort's current operating procedures to include development of training measures for the
MAX BRT system. This scope of work will also include reporting to the ETA as required, and all
meetings and administration needed to complete the above mentioned work. This work was originally
intended to be completed by Transfort staff, however it has become apparent that the level of effort
needed is more than can reasonably be accommodated with existing staffing levels.
In addition, the FTA is requiring the preparation of an environmental re-evaluation for the project. Scope
of work will also include review and comment process with the FTA, oversight and monitoring, and all
associated meetings.
The scope of work that was included in Change Order #1 regarding control and transfer of noxious weeds
during construction for 2013 and 2014 has been deleted and transferred to City Staff to complete. The
budget that was reserved for the noxious weeds will be replaced with the Re-evaluation for environmental
oversight and monitoring scope as discussed above as the timeframe and work to be completed are
comparable. Due to the replacement of scope, there is not a monetary addition associated with Change
Order #3 to include the re-evaluation, and will not be part of this ICE.
CH2M Hill is actively managing the construction activities and should be utilized for these particular
work efforts for maximum efficiency. CH2M Hill is requesting a supplemental budget increase of
$391,668.00 for the start-up and testing scope. I have prepared an Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) also
attached, which is slightly higher in cost at $433,606.20. The ICE is based on estimated hours for a 12
Flirt Collins
month period and is dependent up on staff responsibilities and needs. Rates used in this ICE are from a
subcontractor to Michael Baker, Inc (PO #9957149) and have been used in the past as part of this project
(see attached). The difference between the ICE and the proposal is due to a variation in hourly rates, as
the hours proposed are comparable.
Based on my experience, I believe the requested Change Order #2 for the amount of $391,668.00 is
reasonable for the anticipated safety, security and administrative work remaining for the construction and
testing/startup phase of the BRT project. I recommend approval of this Change Order.
2
fty
Fort �Clins Independent Cost Estimate
Date of Estimate: 4-Mar-13
Contract Type:
Existing Contract or PO (Y/N): Y
Description of Goods (A) or Services (e):
Provide startup and testing services to the MAX BRT project to ensure cohesiveness between all electrical and
communication components for the project Hourly rates were taken from a subcontractor to Michael Baker Inc.
contract PO# 9957149) and are attached as supporting documentation.
I have obtained the following estimate from;
Published Price List/ Past Pricing (date)
Engineering or Technical Estimate (performed by) Kan Craven
Independent Third Party Estimate (performed by)
Other (specify)
Cost Estimate Details:
(Estimate calculated in US Dollars)
Cost of Standard Items
Product
Cost( lea)
Cost( lea)
NoteslData Source
Delivered
No Freight
Total
Cost of Services, Repairs, or Non -Standard hems
Item/Task:
Materials or Work Description
Other Direct
Costs
Labor
Rate (S)
Labor
Hours
Labor
Class
Allocated
Overhead
SGBA'
Profit
TOTAL
Construction Project Manager (4
months 15 hrs/wk)
$ 135.00
259.8
$ 35,073.00
Assistant Construction Principal
8 months rfil 20 hrstw%
$ 75.00
692.8
$ 51.960.00
Field Engineer (4 months Q 45
hrs/wk)
$ 82.00
779.4
$ 63.910.80
Sr. Slartuprresting Engineer(12
months @ 25 hrsMeek)
$ 10700
1299
$ 138,993.00
Startup/Testing Engineer(12
months C& 40 hrsAveek)
$ 56.00
2078.4
$ 116,390.40
Admin Staff- (12 months Q 15
hrsAveek)
$ 35.00
779A
$ 27,279.00
Total
$ 433,606.20
r 1 1� '
Signature of Preparer. - jju (/(/mot,(/'�jVt /
K ri Craven
I.Ir"ce ,ew acmlrv.1.e ...
PROJECT COST WORKSHEET (SPECIFIC RATE OF PAY)
Project Number:
7072 Masan Corral MAX BRT Final Design
Location:
Fort Calline-CSD
Finn Name:
Hartwig $ Associates. Inc.
Name of Preparer:
Dave Stevenson
Firm phone No:
72U733-1821
Scope of Work Date:
November 242009
Contract Time:
TED
Type of Proposal.
Soeaflc Rate of Pay
ESTIMATED
BEGINNING DATE:
TBD
IA. SPECIFIC RATE OF PAY
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
DIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT
FEE
MULTIPLIER
SPECIFIC RATE
NAME
CLASSIFICATION
COSTIHOUR
COST(%)
(%)
SIHOUR
fat
(bl
( )
(on
!¢1
Dyer, David A.
Sir. TecMaan iII
5 ID] 00
0
0%
1 0000
$ ID7.00
Hanson, Ryan E.
Sr TechnioanI
5 8200
0
0%
1 Won
s 0900
Hi ig, Marnnena L.
Sr. Engineer/Pnnapal
s 13500
0
0%
1.0300
5 13500
Romero, M¢bael
Trensponation En9meer l
s 56.00
0
0%
10000
5 5600
Le-e. tual
Sr. Praia. Adminwrator
5 75.00
0
0%
1.0000
s 75.00
Stevenson, Dave
Sr. Project Manager
s 13500
0
0%
1.0000
$ 135.00
Spear, Larissa
Administrative Coordinator
5 35.00
0
0%
1 =0
s 35.00
Sm.m, Danielle
Sr. Tmrsponmian En9ioeer
s 109.00
0
0%
1,0000
s 10900
Multiplier (d)=I1+(in))x[I+(c)]
Specific Rate ($/Hour)=(a)+(axb)+(a+(axb)icor (a)x(d)
18. LABOR COSTS
SPECIFIC RATE
EST. NO.
ESTIMATED COST
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
$/HOUR
OF WORK
PER EMPLOYEE
NAME
CLASSIFICATION
(from 1A)
HOURS
(e)
(IL
(e f)
Dyer, David A.
Sr. Technician II
107
104
$11, 128.00
Hanson, Ryan E.
Sr Technician 1
82
280
$22.96000
Hartwig, Marvill L
5, Engineer/Principal
135
40
55,400.00
Romero, Michael
Transportation Engoeer 1
- 56
160
g8,960.00
Lewis, Kathy
Sr. Protect Administrator
75
0
$000
Stevenson, Dave
Sr. Project Manager
135
96
S12,960.00
Spear, Larissa
Administrative Coordinator
35
$0.00
Smith, Danielle
Sr. Transportation Engineer
109
96
$10 464.00
TOTAL
776
$71872.D0
2A. OTHER DIRECT COSTS (In-house Current Unit Rate - billed at cost)
ITEM ESTIMATED RATE ESTIMATED
rcege 0.55 $
'Current federal govemment rate SUBTOTAL
2B. OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Outside)
ITEM
ESTIMATED RATE
UNITS
Meals
A l Reasonable Cost-Subjstd to State Fiscal Rules
Lodging
Actual Reasonable Cast - Subject to State Fiscal Rules
Project retired actual and reasonable vests subject to pro' epproval of
Miscellaneous
CDOT/PM
Mailing and Postage
Actual Reasonable Cost
Deliveries
10 525.00
Postage
Actual Reasonable Cost
Reports
Actual Reasonable Cost
Copies
Actual Reasonable Coal
ODC TOTAL $0 00
Hartwig 8 Associates, Inc.
7073 Mason Comdor, MAX SET Final Design
For Got ne - CSU
Page 1 at T