The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWORK ORDER - RFP - 7175 BRIDGE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (6)EXHIBIT "All WORK ORDER FORM PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TORT COLLINS and Michael Baker, Jr. Inc. DATED: December 28, 2012 Work OrderNumber: 11-254902400-12 Project Title: Bridge Inspection Maintenance, Repair & Replacement Program 2012 Minor Bridge Inspection Commencement Date: November 16, 2012 Completion Date: April 15, 2013 (See Deliverable Schedule at end of scope of Service) Maximum Fee: (time and reimbursable directs costs): not to exceed $34,281.06 ProjectDeseription: See attached scope of service. Scope of Services: See attached scope of service, Service Provider agrees to perform the services Identified above and on the attached forms in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein and in the Services' Agreement between the parties. In the event of a conflict between or ambiguity in the terms of tine Services Agreement and this work order (including the attached forms), the Services Agreement shall control. Service Provider By: Date: December28.2012 Approved By: Purchasing Agent over $60,000 The attached forms consisting of six (6) pages are hereby accepted and incorporated herein by this reference, and Notice to Proceed is hereby given. City of Port Collins Date: December28.2012 Exhibit "B" Task Order 6 Fee Summary for Michael Baker Jr., Inc. City of Fort Collins Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Program Description: 2012 minor structure bridge inspections (Inspected between October 2012.and April 2013). PRIMARY DESIGN TASK ELEMENTS• • LABOR, Project Administration & Meetings 40 $5,664.30 Inspections $28,132.01 Subtotal[ $33,796.31 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES:,(Approximate) - ._ - Copies & Plotting (B&W) (4,000 x $0.05) $200.00 Copies & Plotting (Color) (400 x $0.50) $200.00 Mileage (1 trips x 150 mi x $0.565 / mi 1 meetings only) $84.15 Postage & Deliveries $0.00 Subtotall $484.75 sUBCQNSULTANTS NSA 01 $0.00 Subtotal 0 0.00 • • • Fee $34,281.06 121312012 1 of 2 Task Order 6 Fee Schedule for Michael Baker Jr., Ina my of Fort Colllhs Bridge Inspection; Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Program oeaadptbm 2012 minor structure bridge Inspections (InsDeded between October 2012 and And 2013). Irem' - - Stiticlun Number. Last ins ttlori SufiihrNY '-Pall- Inip_dfan Idterial. .-. Ner2m Ex(iUT ConMed: -S cei MATII IWOR ,EzL+HN PIb Is _.Avalhbk7� II Ealrtine l 3plahs7,2._. I!Wdlon Cash. 3 R•tl 5, 1�f - thcost •.Ratio[ �.Nours _l 10 'Tarred cont. At Total Noun 1 80RD-l"i '1/9/20o8 92.6 1 60 Re lnapenion No No. No $523 Verillcation $581 040 $Sgll 5.21 2 CANr-MULTI-F V25/2012 55.1 24 Re-Inspeelicn Yes Yes No $741 Veriflution - $So 0.50 $798 6.95 3 CANY S-MULE 1/25/2012 36.299999 12 Re-IngoItlon Yea Yes No $741 Verification $58 0.50 $798 6.95 4 CEMT-MTN 1/11/2009 93 60 Re.Incpedion No No No $523 Vedfiution $58 0.5 $581 S.21 5 EMT -ARCS 11Ilf200S 89 to Re-Insp<[tlon No No No $523 Verification - $53 05 $Sal 5.21 6 CHRY411NT 1125/2012 69.6 60 Relnapettlon Yes _. Yes No $741 Vaelficatlen ,$58 01c, $798 6.95 7 CHRY SYCM-A 1/26/2012 46.7999" 36 Re-lriapedien Yes Yes No $741 VerifUon $So 05 --'$798 5.95 8 CIPP-DART 1/11/2005 90.199997 60 aednzpettlen me No No $523 Vedition ,$53 0.5 $581 5.21 9 CRST-COOK 1/10/2008 86 E0 Re -Inspection No No - No $523 VeriOouNRI : $58 05 ,$Sal 5.21 30 CTM-SFW-i N/A - N/A N/A Newlnnsvai4n No Nil No $657Vftoel Patina .. $58 030 $714 63a 11 DRK.MDL 1/10/ZOOS 95300003 60 Re Ini,scucnn No - No No $523 Verification $so 050 '$Sal 5.21 12 ELM-W-5hW 2/8/2005 97.0 24- Re-lnspesthsh No No No $523 Verification 558 0.50 $551 5.23 13 HRMY-S-SVRG 1/10/2008 84.2 6D Re inspection No No No $523 Verification $581 050 $Sol 5.21 14 HRMY-W-CLGE 119/2008 815- 60 Re-lntPettbn No No No $523 Veriffrelm $58 0.50 $sal 511 15 HRMY-W-RGNC ]/lo/}008 96.1 60 Re hrr, lion No No No $523 Verification $so Os -$Sal 511 As HTH-FLT 1/8/2008 919 6D Re4nspenion No No No $523 VddficaUon $58 03 .$Sal 511 17 LAKE-W{ R 2/8/2005 99.7 - 24 Re4nspedbn No NO No $523 Venflotion $58 050 $582 511 - 18 IAl'i 1/13/2012 65.0 60 - Re-InspectionVe No Yes No $476 rification .$58 0.50 $534 4.71 19 LW -CON 1/9/2008 96.1 60 Re-lnapecsion No No No $523 Verificanen $58 0.50 $581 5.22 201.0( NP 1/25/2012 69.8 60 Re-Ir,onioh Yea Yes No $741 Vnificathnt ::$$a 0.50 $798 635 21 LOOM -MAP -A 2/10/2012 47.8- -. 36-: Re -inspection Yes Yes No $741 Verifiutlon $so 0.5 .$798 - 6.95 22 LPL-MLD I/29/2 "Is .8 -0 ae-Inspection Yes No No $788 Verification $58 0.5 $846 7.45 ;23 LRL MYRT-A' 1/Z6/2012 60.8 -1 12 - Re-Inapenlon Yes Yes -- No - - --$741 Verification $5o DEC$798 6.95 24 MAP-WHTNI-A 2/10/2012 . ".a 36 - Re-Impenlon Yes Yes No $741 Verifiulion $58 0.5 $79S 6.95 25 ML1Y M-A N/A N/A N/A Niie Inspection Yes No No $7W Wsual tells, I ssal 0.s :$m 7A5 26 MTN W-WHTM 2/10/2012 36.9 24- Ro-invpe[tion Yes Yea No S741 Vedfiution' $58 0 $798 635 27 MTV-W-TM.B 1/18/2012 63.5 24 re -Inspection No Yea No $476 Verification - $58 0 '$534 4.72 28 WITT-W-SHUT, D 1/25/2012 37.7 24 Re-Irspection Yes' yea No $741 Verification ' $58 OS $798 ISSS 29 OAK-WHTM ln6/2012 55.1 60 Fo4e,penion Yes Yes No $741 VnHf.1kn, $58 050- iS798 6.95 30 OLN-W-LOOM .. 1/26/2012 37.8 24 _ Re-Iralcuoo Yea ... Yes. No $741 Verification $53 DS $798 6.95 -31 PORT-SW-TRIIL-F '1/10/20oa 84.5 60 Re-Inspectlon. No No No $523 Vedfiution $58 a50 $Sol 5.21 32 PFSTAV{TRE 3/11/2011 783 24 Re -Inspection Yes '. Yes: No - $741 Verition fin $so 0.50 '$798 - 635 33 PAST W-HRT N/A MIA N/A New inspection No No No $657 Wsual Rating $Sat o30 .5714 638 34SHUDS-Plff 1 1/10/2003 - - 95.0 60 - Re-Irupenlon- No IN. No $523 Vedither. 558 050 '5581 511 35 STOV.DART 2/7/2006 _ 97.0 1 24 Re-Invpenion No No. No $523 Vedfutim $58 . OS 5581 511 ,36 TMa-S HRMY' 3/11/2011 65.9 I8 Re-hapedket No Yes No $476 Vedficatlon $58 03 $5ul 4.71 .37 TRIL-W03-WY N/A - A N/A New lnapecibn No No - No -- $657 Watel Rating $581 05 $714 638 38 TAIL-W-PORT 1/10/2W8 313 60 Re -Inspection No No - No $523 Verification 558 OS $581 5.21 39 WHTM-MW-A 10/1/2009 96.0 36 - R.4nspectipn Yes' . No No $789 Verification $so 0.50 $946 7.45 40 WHTM-S-LAPT-A 2/10/2012 47.8 - -36 11e4napedion' Yes Yes No $741 Vedfiution $58 050 $798 635 41 WOODS-SYCM 1/25/2012 47.1 36 Re-lntptdion Yes .. ... Yet"-.. No $741 Verlfelen $58 0,50 $798 6.95 42 - $0 $0 0.00 $0 43 $0 $o 0.00 $o aol 44 $0 $0 0.00 '50 0.00 45 - - - - $0 Sol am $o 0.00 • My visual or load nUnv dumednacasaryduo to aching4 of conditions dlsmvered during the verifwNot jot, udural der[., or clowiaraabn)will not be R'v-^i Fae zx:Mars Incbded with this work order. In this case, Baker will coordinate with the City to ammend the work order as retests, _$Z8,332 248.44 OCeas highlighted Nyellow mW re4uire Mplu ent on Nefre4uenry meof Inspections. This adjustment is Informational only, and does not have any inroads on scope, fee,ade Ntrablis. lwvxl2 PoPe242 Exhibit "A" WORK ORDER FORM PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC. DATED: November 16, 2012 Work Order No. Purchase Order No. Project title: Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Program 2012 Minor Bridge Inspections Commencement Date: November 16, 2012 Completion Date: April 15, 2013 (See Deliverables Schedule at end of scope of services) Maximum Fee: $34,281.06 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This scope of work is for bridge inspection and related services of minor structures for the 2012 inspection cycle (structures inspected between October 2012 and April 2013). This work order is performed under the master agreement for the City's Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement Program. Work elements include project administration, field inspections and reporting, and structure ratings. A detailed description of each anticipated service is described below. Minor structures range in length from 4 feet to 20 feet with types that include, but are not limited to; bridges, box culverts, pipe culverts, multi -plate arches, and rigid frames. Each structure shall be inspected at a frequency not to exceed four years (or more frequently if determined by the City). The majority of the City's minor structures have previously been inspected and load rated. However, there are a number of structures that are either new or have not previously been included in the inspection program. Some structures may have limited access (confined space) and shall be considered separately from other structures. SCOPE OF SERVICES: Baker will inspect a total of 41 structures. The breakdown of structures is: 37 re -inspections and 4 new inspections. There are 18 confined space structures (17 re -inspections, 1 new). Baker will provide all information collected from the field inspections to the City for record keeping, including report output in an excel format consistent with the City's asset management program (see below for more information). Existing structures will be evaluated to compare current conditions to the conditions documented from the previous inspection. Structures rated for the first time, as well as those structures where the inspection reveals significant changes from previous inspections, will required either a visual or load rating. It is anticipated that 0 load ratings, 4 visual ratings, and 37 rating verifications will be performed. Exhibit A - Work Order Form Bridge Inspection, Mointenonce, Repair and Replacement program-2011 Minor Bridge nsp ions Any variations to the number of the anticipated inspect documented.work ord es as necessaryfro, that sted above will be documented. Baker will coordinate with the City to modify I. Project Administration Uadministration duties throughout the length of the Upon notice to proceed, Baker will perform project contract. A. Invoices will be for rfo m dCity o ng the current bill nly basis g pe iod and projecll include a t lto dat ing mmary and a progress report f P B. All documents will receive a quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) review, in accordance with the Baker Way, prior to submittal. C. The following meetings are anticipated: • Two Progress Meetings (Assume phone meetings only) • One Project Delivery Meeting and telephone conversations and provide them to the D. Baker will prepare documentation of meetings City for review and recording keeping. II. Field Inspections and ReportingND Baker shall perform all inspections and reporting in accordance with the GUIDELINES es that will be performed underth REFERENCES as described below. There are a variety of inspection typ work order: re -inspection (unconfined space), new inspection (unconfined space), re -inspection (confined space), and new inspection (confined space). In all cases, the ge` neral work activities include: • Inspection Preparation. At the outset of the project, all inspection information will be compiled and organized. The project team will determine the preferred inspection order and schedule. The anticipated schedule will also be provided to the City. • Obtain Average Daily Traffic Count (ADT). Baker will use traffic counting devices to take a 24-hour traffic count at each location, unless recent traffic count information is provided by the City. • Field Inspection. Baker will perform structural inspections at each location specified by the City. Inspectors will evaluate and assess the structural condition of appropriate elements, take or update field measurements, take new a visual ratingphotos, (aassessbloveand rall performance including scour (if applicable), perform document recommended maintenance/repair activities. Documentation and Sketches. If available, previous documentation and sketches will be revised as necessary. If no existing information is available, new documentation and sketches will be prepared. —CADD drawings will be prepared in Microstation or AutoCad. • Report Production. Field inspection data will be input into PONTIS 4.1.1, or an ses of inspectionr d data. Specific ase report output shaare program, for lubeoprepared recording asrequestedby the City, including six (6) excel output files. • Inspection and Report QC. All inspection and reporting data will be reviewed for verification of quality control procedures and data accuracy. • Submittal. All deliverables will be submitted to the City at the end of the project. See DELIVERABLES below for more information. 2 of January 6, 2012 Exhibit - Work Order Form Bridge Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Program —2011 Minor Bridge Inspections Any emergency inspections shall not be included with this work order, but shall be considered as part of a separate work order. General work activities for emergency inspections shall follow those listed above, but may also require additional activities, as determined on a case -by -case basis. III. Structure Ratings and Verification The work activities for this effort fall into one of three categories: verification of the existing rating, preparation of a new visual rating, or preparation of a new load rating. The following chart defines when each of the activities is required. Determination of Existing Plans Existing Plans Rating Type Available Not Available :i; rs e,�•ya Re -Inspection ELisi, 4�aT@ s�JrARWI W?Z New Inspection `• • e 1 A. Verification of Existing Rating All existing structures should already have a rating assigned through previous inspections. In this case, Baker will verify that the element conditions defined with the existing rating have not changed significantly. If conditions have changed such that further investigation is warranted, Baker may perform a new rating (load or visual) if directed by the City. Such work will be considered out -of - scope and not included with this work order. B. Visual Rating When applicable, Baker will prepare a visual rating for the inspected structure. The visual rating shall be based on the condition of the structure at the time of the inspection and prepared in accordance with the GUIDESAND REFERENCES as defined below. C. Load Rating When applicable, Baker will prepare a load rating for the inspected structure. The load rating shall be based on the structure as originally constructed (if possible) and include such effects such as new rehabilitation elements, deterioration or damage. The load rating shall be performed using Load Factor Design methodology with the HS-20 design vehicle. All load ratings shall be prepared using hand calculations, AASHTOWare VIRTIS® software, and/or other applicable software. Quality Control for the calculations and report shall be prepared in accordance with CDOT policy. GUIDELINES AND REFERENCES All inspections will be conducted in accordance with current NBIS standards and supervised by personnel meeting the requirements outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations, 23 CFR 650.307. Applicable inspection standards include: • CDOT PONTIS Bridge Inspection Coding Guide • Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges (Report No. FHWA-PD-96-001) • Bridge Inspector's Reference Manual (Publication No. FHWA NHI 12-049) • AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 2"d Ed., 2011 • CDOT Bridge Rating Manual January 6, 2012 3 of 4