Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRFP - P1092 MASTER PLAN FOR DOWNTOWN ALLEYS AND INTEGRATED WALKWAYS1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways The Fort Collins Downtown Development Authority (“DDA”) is soliciting proposals from qualified consultants with broad experience in streetscape, civic area design, and pedestrian facility planning to develop a master plan for downtown alleys and integrated walkways with an emphasis on connectivity from Old Town to the Downtown River District and the Colorado State University campus. The master plan will describe the means by which the DDA, the City, and affiliated stakeholders can achieve the vision for creating an integrated pedestrian network through the identification and enhancement of formal and informal pedestrian pathways and facilities. The master plan will contain a conceptual design component. The DDA encourages teams comprised of a lead urban design or landscape architecture firm with a supporting role provided by a qualified civil engineering firm to ensure a detailed and accurate assessment of utility issues. Written proposals, five (5) will be received at the City of Fort Collins' Purchasing Division, 215 North Mason St., 2nd floor, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524. Proposals will be received before 3:00 p.m. (our clock), November 14, 2007. Proposal No. P1092. If delivered, they are to be sent to 215 North Mason Street, 2nd Floor, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524. If mailed, the address is P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, 80522-0580. A pre-proposal meeting will be held October 29, at 2:00 p.m. at 215 N Mason, Conference Room 2A. Questions concerning the scope of the project should be directed to Matt Robenalt, Project Manager of the Downtown Development Authority, 970-419-4381 or e-mail at mrobenalt@fcgov.com Questions regarding proposals submittal or process should be directed to John D. Stephen, CPPO, CPPB, Senior Buyer (970) 221-6777. A copy of the Proposal may be obtained as follows: 1. Download the Proposal/Bid from the BuySpeed Webpage, https://secure2.fcgov.com/bso/login.jsp 2. Come by Purchasing at 215 North Mason St., 2nd floor, Fort Collins, and request a copy of the Bid. Administrative Services Purchasing Division 215 N. Mason St. 2nd Floor PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6775 970.221.6707 fcgov.com/purchasing 2 Sales Prohibited/Conflict of Interest: No officer, employee, or member of City Council, shall have a financial interest in the sale to the City of any real or personal property, equipment, material, supplies or services where such officer or employee exercises directly or indirectly any decision-making authority concerning such sale or any supervisory authority over the services to be rendered. This rule also applies to subcontracts with the City. Soliciting or accepting any gift, gratuity favor, entertainment, kickback or any items of monetary value from any person who has or is seeking to do business with the City of Fort Collins is prohibited. Collusive or sham proposals: Any proposal deemed to be collusive or a sham proposal will be rejected and reported to authorities as such. Your authorized signature of this proposal assures that such proposal is genuine and is not a collusive or sham proposal. The City of Fort Collins reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any irregularities or informalities. Sincerely, James B. O'Neill II, CPPO, FNIGP Director of Purchasing & Risk Management 3 P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways PROJECT DESCRIPTION & SCOPE OF WORK I. INTRODUCTION The Fort Collins Downtown Development Authority (“DDA”) is soliciting proposals from qualified consultants with broad experience in streetscape, civic area design, and pedestrian facility planning to develop a master plan for downtown alleys and integrated walkways with an emphasis on connectivity from Old Town to the Downtown River District, and from Old Town to the Colorado State University campus. See Attached Study Area Map. The master plan will describe the means by which the DDA, the City, and affiliated stakeholders can achieve the vision for creating an integrated pedestrian network through the identification and enhancement of formal and informal pedestrian pathways and facilities. The plan will contain a conceptual design component, and estimate of probable construction costs. The selected consultant/consultant team will suggest urban design features that will significantly enhance the visual pedestrian experience, improve safety, improve cleanliness, and provide clear directional signage for the integrated alley and walkway system. Methods for mitigating displacement of traditional utilitarian functions in alleyways, such as delivery vehicle loading/unloading and trash/recycling storage are of very high importance. It is the intent of this scope of work to give prospective consultants the needed information to prepare a proposal for master planning services. The director of the Downtown Development Authority and/or their representative will be available to answer questions during the proposal process. History and Context In 2004, the Fort Collins Downtown Strategic Plan identified as a “pedestrian strategy”, the concept to integrate pedestrian infrastructure by dramatically enhancing alleyways that connect prominent destinations such as parking structures and Old Town Square Plaza. As a result, in 2006 the DDA funded and constructed the Trimble Court Alley and Tenney Court Alley improvements. These alley improvements integrated urban design features that significantly enhanced the visual pedestrian experience, improved safety and cleanliness, stimulated businesses to build storefronts opening to the alleys,and provided the framework and template for future alley enhancements in the downtown. In 2007, the Community Foundation of Northern Colorado convened UniverCity Connections, a process that brought more than 100 citizen stakeholders together to develop a vision to guide "connections" between CSU, the Downtown, and the Cache La Poudre River. The connections, both physical and programmatic in nature, have been embodied in an action plan prepared by eight task groups. The UniverCity Connections Transit & Mobility task group deemed that getting there should be as much fun as being there, and outlined actions for creating an exciting mobility system that can enhance the unfolding cultural milieu of the city by connecting the Downtown River District to Old Town; connecting the university with downtown; and connecting all to the Mason Corridor. The task force recommended expansion of the DDA’s downtown alleyway 4 enhancement program to create the vibrant and interesting pedestrian linkages envisioned for the UniverCity Connections study area. II. Planning Process Oversight The planning process will be directed by the DDA and guided by a committee established through appointment by the DDA that will include, but not be limited to, representatives from the City of Fort Collins, UniverCity Connections Transit & Mobility task force members, and CSU facility and campus planning staff. Property and business owner involvement is critical to the success of this planning process, and their engagement is expected to be thorough and inclusive throughout the process. III. Scope of Work Under the following sections, the listed tasks/elements will require research, analysis and recommendations, including coordination with property and business owners and solicitation of input in at least three public sessions. Proposing consultant/consultant teams should provide a detailed written response to each task, the definition of cost by task, and the key personnel that will be assigned to each task. Task A. Identify and Analyze Pedestrian Linkages Options It is human nature for pedestrians to navigate the shortest distance to their destination, and they often choose a myriad of pathways to accomplish their travel. Throughout the downtown, and in the surrounding areas between the river and university campus, pedestrians utilize both formal and informal pathways and facilities to reach their destinations. The primary goal of this project is to identify and analyze the current use of the existing pedestrian facilities and pathways and make recommendations for enhancing the logical connections between primary destinations and activity nodes in the study area via alleyways, existing sidewalks, and “goat paths.” “Goat paths” are examples of the informal short-cut routes taken by pedestrians across parking lots, through vacant lots and between or through buildings. ƒ Identify pedestrian linkage options, including alleyways, ideally suited for enhancement in each sub-area: Downtown River District, Old Town, and Downtown-Campus. Task B. Identify Assets, Opportunities, and Challenges to Enhancement of Pedestrian Linkage Options In detailed narrative format, identify the assets, opportunities and challenges to enhancing the pedestrian linkage options identified in Task A of the scope of work. Identify and expound the characteristics of the proposed linkages in relation to: ƒ adjacency to primary destinations and activity nodes (existing and future); ƒ unique urban vistas; ƒ physical barriers; ƒ real or perceived safety concerns; 5 ƒ access issues related to private property; ƒ compatibility or conflicts with public utilities; ƒ cleanliness or maintenance issues; and ƒ trash/recycling storage and collection; and ƒ other related items identified during the planning process. ƒ Summarize in a tabular-style or matrix format (11x17 inch layout), all assets, opportunities and challenges identified in Task A of the scope of work. Task C. Creative Solutions for Trash/Recycling Storage & Collection, and General Cleanliness The redevelopment and enhancement of alleyways creates a situation where the utilitarian function of trash/recycling storage and collection is displaced to accommodate the more desired outcome of a vibrant, alive, safe and clean pedestrian passageway. It is therefore necessary to develop a creative solution to mitigate the impact to trash generators, trash collectors, neighboring businesses, and to general users of the enhanced alleyways. The project team will engage representatives of local trash hauling companies, and impacted businesses to determine the best possible solution for each alleyway proposed for enhancement in Task A. This task will require identification of the type (e.g. restaurant, office, residential) and volume of waste generation occurring in each alleyway, the type and volume of storage devices currently in use, and the frequency of pickup by haulers. Recommended solutions will include cost feasibility for construction and implementation, and will examine, at a minimum, the following: ƒ Voluntary districting (a.k.a. private contracting with sole service provider) on the block level ƒ Traditional dumpster storage vs. trash compactor ƒ Underground dumpster storage and related technologies ƒ Daily collection vs. non-daily pickup schedules ƒ Grease/oil storage containment options for restaurants Task D. Recommendation In detailed narrative format with supporting location maps, develop a two-tier recommendation (Preferred and Alternate) of pedestrian linkage routes that are ideally suited for enhancement in the sub- areas: Downtown River District, Old Town, and Downtown-Campus. The recommendations will be made by applying informal criteria to be developed by the consultant team and the DDA, and will be based on the goals of: ƒ Facilitation of efficient access, circulation, and connection to existing and future destinations and activity nodes in the study area; and ƒ Improvement of comfort, convenience, safety and visual enjoyment of the pedestrian environment; and 6 ƒ Enhancement of the economic vitality of sub-areas through increased opportunities for private investment in alley façade improvements and infill redevelopment adjacent to the pedestrian linkages; and ƒ Enhancement of the social and cultural experience of students, residents and visitors of the study area. Task E. Conceptual Design Sketches Prepare color concept sketches for the “Preferred” alleyways and integrated walkways recommended in Task D. Final sketch formatting will include: ƒ 8.5 x 11 inch format .pdf (color) ea. ƒ 11 x 17 inch format .pdf (very high resolution, color) ea. ƒ 24 x 36 inch format mounted on foam-core presentation boards (color) ea. IV. MEETINGS & PUBLIC PROCESS Coordination and review by city and DDA staff will be required throughout the project. As the master plan progresses, review by other City Departments will be necessary. The Consultant will be expected to participate in these reviews. Meetings - It is anticipated that the following meetings will be required, at a minimum, for this project: Initial Coordination Meeting: At this meeting the Consultant will be expected to provide a detailed schedule of the planning process, including the work of any sub-consultants, identifying important milestones in the process and target dates for these milestones. Progress Meetings: Progress meetings will be held every two weeks during the course of the project. Meetings may be more frequent at times, if need be. Utility Coordination: At least three meetings are anticipated to coordinate with affected utility companies. Prior to meeting with utilities, the DDA and City will assist the Consultant in collecting comments from utilities through the existing utility coordination process. Attend review meetings with appropriate city staff including Parks and Recreation, Planning, Engineering and Utility departments with regard to the enhanced alleyways and integrated walkways. In addition, attend any necessary individual meetings with the other City departments, and business/property owners as requested. Public meetings: The DDA anticipates there will be at least four public meetings. These will be in the form of neighborhood meetings using affected property owner and business owner lists generated by the City and DDA. One meeting should be conducted in charette format with invitees to include business and property owners, and open to the general public, and a series of open houses to present draft concept renderings, and final plan and renderings. The DDA will be responsible for leading the public involvement program with the support of the Consultant. The Consultant will be responsible for development of renderings, and related handouts for the public meetings. 7 The Consultant is expected to provide a written summary of public comments from all meetings. The Consultant will be expected to attend a total of 4 City and DDA Board (2 ea.) meetings for review and acceptance of the project. V. DELIVERABLES Deliverables shall include: ƒ Final Master Plan Document – 15 full-color copies, 11x17” lefthand bound booklet that: ƒ describes tasks, ƒ summary of findings, ƒ summary of progression of planning and public process (including meeting summaries)Issue resolution plan ƒ Conceptual design plans for pedestrian connections – see Task E ƒ Final Master Plan – digital format .pdf provided on DVD (2 copies) Deliverables are due on November 1, 2008 VI. PROJECT FUNDING Funding for the elements of this project outlined in this RFP will be provided primarily through DDA resources. Funds have been appropriated, are available and will not be disclosed. VII. FEES These services will be awarded based on a Not-to-Exceed Time and Reimbursable Direct Cost Basis Agreement. The Consultant will provide as part of its proposal a rough order-of magnitude estimate of site analysis, feasibility fees, and design fees, based upon the services described in this proposal. Consultants must also provide hourly rates. Upon the selection of the Consultant, the final fee will be negotiated with input from the Consultant based upon how they foresee the overall project. VIII. SCHEDULE Start date: upon execution of signed contract and issuance of letter to proceed. End: November 1, 2008 8 IX. EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSAL An evaluation committee shall rank the interested firms based on their written proposals using the ranking system set forth below. Firms shall be evaluated on the following criteria. The ranking scale shall be from 1 to 5, with 1 being a poor rating and 5 an outstanding rating. Recommended weighting factors for the criteria are listed adjacent to the qualification. Weighting Factor Qualification Standard 2.0 Scope of Proposal Does the proposal show an understanding of the project objective, methodology to be used, and results that are desired from the project? 2.0 Assigned Personnel Do the persons who will be working on the project have the necessary skills? Are sufficient people of the requisite skills assigned to the project? 1.0 Availability Can the work be completed in the necessary time? Can the target start and completion dates be met? Are other qualified personnel available to assist in meeting the project schedule if required? Is the project team available to attend meetings as required by the Scope of Work? 1.0 Motivation Is the firm interested and are they capable of doing the work in the required time frame? 2.0 Cost and Work Hours Do the proposed cost and work hours compare favorably with the project Manager's estimate? Are the work hours presented reasonable for the effort required in each project task or phase? 2.0 Firm Capability Does the firm have the support capabilities the assigned personnel require? Has the firm done previous projects of this type and scope? 9 X. REFERENCE EVALUATION (Top-ranked firms) The Project Manager will check references using the following criteria. The evaluation rankings will be labeled Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory. QUALIFICATION STANDARD Overall Performance Would you hire this Professional again? Did they show the skills required by this project? Timetable Was the original Scope of Work completed within the specified time? Were interim deadlines met in a timely manner? Completeness Was the Professional responsive to client needs; did the Professional anticipate problems? Were problems solved quickly and effectively? Budget Was the original Scope of Work completed within the project budget? Job Knowledge a) If a study, did it meet the Scope of work? b) If Professional administered a construction contract, was the project functional upon completion and did it operate properly? Were problems corrected quickly and effectively. 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into the day and year set forth below, by and between THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and _____, [insert either a corporation, a partnership or an individual,doing business as _______________, hereinafter referred to as "Professional". WITNESSETH: In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations herein expressed, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of Services. The Professional agrees to provide services in accordance with the scope of services attached hereto as Exhibit "A", consisting of ( ) pages, and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. The Work Schedule. [Optional] The services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the Work Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "B", consisting of ( ) pages, and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Contract Period. This Agreement shall commence 200 and shall continue in full force and effect until 200 , unless sooner terminated as herein provided. In addition, at the option of the City, the Agreement may be extended for additional one year periods not to exceed four (4) additional one year periods. Renewals and pricing changes shall be negotiated by and agreed to by both parties. The Denver Boulder Greeley CPIU published by the Colorado State Planning and Budget Office will be used as a guide. . Written notice of renewal shall be provided to the Service Provider and mailed no later than ninety (90) days prior to contract end. 4. Early Termination by City. Notwithstanding the time periods contained herein, the City may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause by providing written notice of termination to the Professional. Such notice shall be delivered at least fifteen (15) days prior to 2 the termination date contained in said notice unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties. All notices provided under this Agreement shall be effective when mailed, postage prepaid and sent to the following addresses: Professional: City: With Copy to: City of Fort Collins, Purchasing PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 In the event of any such early termination by the City, the Professional shall be paid for services rendered prior to the date of termination, subject only to the satisfactory performance of the Professional's obligations under this Agreement. Such payment shall be the Professional's sole right and remedy for such termination. 5. Design, Project Indemnity and Insurance Responsibility. The Professional shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, timely completion and the coordination of all services rendered by the Professional, including but not limited to designs, plans, reports, specifications, and drawings and shall, without additional compensation, promptly remedy and correct any errors, omissions, or other deficiencies. The Professional shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees in accordance with Colorado law, from all damages whatsoever claimed by third parties against the City; and for the City's costs and reasonable attorneys fees, arising directly or indirectly out of the Professional's performance of any of the services furnished under this Agreement. The Professional shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in the amount of $500,000 combined single limits and errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $ . 6. Compensation. [Use this paragraph or Option 1 below.] In consideration of the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement, the City agrees to pay Professional a fixed fee in the amount of ($ ) plus reimbursable direct costs. All such fees and costs shall not exceed ($ ). Monthly partial payments based upon the Professional's 3 billings and itemized statements are permissible. The amounts of all such partial payments shall be based upon the Professional's City-verified progress in completing the services to be performed pursuant hereto and upon the City's approval of the Professional's actual reimbursable expenses. [Optional] Insert Subcontractor ClauseFinal payment shall be made following acceptance of the work by the City. Upon final payment, all designs, plans, reports, specifications, drawings, and other services rendered by the Professional shall become the sole property of the City. 6. Compensation. [Option 1] In consideration of the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement, the City agrees to pay Professional on a time and reimbursable direct cost basis according to the following schedule: Hourly billing rates: Reimbursable direct costs: with maximum compensation (for both Professional's time and reimbursable direct costs) not to exceed ($ ). Monthly partial payments based upon the Professional's billings and itemized statements of reimbursable direct costs are permissible. The amounts of all such partial payments shall be based upon the Professional's City-verified progress in completing the services to be performed pursuant hereto and upon the City's approval of the Professional's reimbursable direct costs. Final payment shall be made following acceptance of the work by the City. Upon final payment, all designs, plans, reports, specifications, drawings and other services rendered by the Professional shall become the sole property of the City. 7. City Representative. The City will designate, prior to commencement of work, its project representative who shall make, within the scope of his or her authority, all necessary and proper decisions with reference to the project. All requests for contract interpretations, change orders, and other clarification or instruction shall be directed to the City Representative. 8. Project Drawings. [Optional]Upon conclusion of the project and before final 4 payment, the Professional shall provide the City with reproducible drawings of the project containing accurate information on the project as constructed. Drawings shall be of archival, prepared on stable mylar base material using a non-fading process to provide for long storage and high quality reproduction. "CD" disc of the as-built drawings shall also be submitted to the owner in and AutoCAD version no older then the established city standard. 9. Monthly Report. Commencing thirty (30) days after the date of execution of this Agreement and every thirty (30) days thereafter, Professional is required to provide the City Representative with a written report of the status of the work with respect to the Scope of Services, Work Schedule, and other material information. Failure to provide any required monthly report may, at the option of the City, suspend the processing of any partial payment request. 10. Independent Contractor. The services to be performed by Professional are those of an independent contractor and not of an employee of the City of Fort Collins. The City shall not be responsible for withholding any portion of Professional's compensation hereunder for the payment of FICA, Workers' Compensation, other taxes or benefits or for any other purpose. 11. Personal Services. It is understood that the City enters into this Agreement based on the special abilities of the Professional and that this Agreement shall be considered as an agreement for personal services. Accordingly, the Professional shall neither assign any responsibilities nor delegate any duties arising under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. 12. Acceptance Not Waiver. The City's approval of drawings, designs, plans, specifications, reports, and incidental work or materials furnished hereunder shall not in any way relieve the Professional of responsibility for the quality or technical accuracy of the work. The City's approval or acceptance of, or payment for, any of the services shall not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights or benefits provided to the City under this Agreement. 13. Default. Each and every term and condition hereof shall be deemed to be a 5 material element of this Agreement. In the event either party should fail or refuse to perform according to the terms of this agreement, such party may be declared in default. 14. Remedies. In the event a party has been declared in default, such defaulting party shall be allowed a period of ten (10) days within which to cure said default. In the event the default remains uncorrected, the party declaring default may elect to (a) terminate the Agreement and seek damages; (b) treat the Agreement as continuing and require specific performance; or (c) avail himself of any other remedy at law or equity. If the non-defaulting party commences legal or equitable actions against the defaulting party, the defaulting party shall be liable to the non-defaulting party for the non-defaulting party's reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred because of the default. 15. Binding Effect. This writing, together with the exhibits hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and shall be binding upon said parties, their officers, employees, agents and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the respective survivors, heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of said parties. 16. Law/Severability. The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern the construction, interpretation, execution and enforcement of this Agreement. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of this Agreement. 17. Prohibition Against Employing Illegal Aliens. This paragraph shall apply to all Contractors whose performance of work under this Agreement does not involve the delivery of a specific end product other than reports that are merely incidental to the performance of said work. Pursuant to Section 8-17.5-101, C.R.S., et. seq., Contractor represents and agrees that: a. As of the date of this Agreement: 1. Contractor does not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien; and 6 2. Contractor has participated or attempted to participate in the basic pilot employment verification program created in Public Law 208, 104th Congress, as amended, and expanded in Public Law 156, 108th Congress, as amended, administered by the United States Department of Homeland Security (the “Basic Pilot Program”) in order to confirm the employment eligibility of all newly hired employees. b. Contractor shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perform work under this Agreement or knowingly enter into a contract with a subcontractor that knowingly employs or contracts with an illegal alien to perform work under this Agreement. c. Contractor shall continue to apply to participate in the Basic Pilot Program and shall in writing verify same every three (3) calendar months thereafter, until Contractor is accepted or the public contract for services has been completed, whichever is earlier. The requirements of this section shall not be required or effective if the Basic Pilot Program is discontinued. d. Contractor is prohibited from using Basic Pilot Program procedures to undertake pre-employment screening of job applicants while this Agreement is being performed. e. If Contractor obtains actual knowledge that a subcontractor performing work under this Agreement knowingly employs or contracts with an illegal alien, Contractor shall: 1. Notify such subcontractor and the City within three days that Contractor has actual knowledge that the subcontractor is employing or contracting with an illegal alien; and 2. Terminate the subcontract with the subcontractor if within three days of receiving the notice required pursuant to this section the subcontractor does not cease employing or contracting with the illegal alien; except that Contractor shall 7 not terminate the contract with the subcontractor if during such three days the subcontractor provides information to establish that the subcontractor has not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal alien. f. Contractor shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (the “Department”) made in the course of an investigation that the Department undertakes or is undertaking pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 8-17.5-102 (5), C.R.S. g. If Contractor violates any provision of this Agreement pertaining to the duties imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. the City may terminate this Agreement. If this Agreement is so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for actual and consequential damages to the City arising out of Contractor’s violation of Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. h. The City will notify the Office of the Secretary of State if Contractor violates this provision of this Agreement and the City terminates the Agreement for such breach. 18. Special Provisions. [Optional] Special provisions or conditions relating to the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement are set forth in Exhibit " ", consisting of ( ) pages, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 8 THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO By: _________________________________ James B. O'Neill II, CPPO, FNIGP Director of Purchasing & Risk Management DATE: ______________________________ ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ Assistant City Attorney [Insert Professional's name] or [Insert Partnership Name] or [Insert individual's name] or Doing business as [insert name of business] By: __________________________________ Title: _______________________________ CORPORATE PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT Date: _______________________________ ATTEST: _________________________________ (Corporate Seal) Corporate Secretary ADDENDUM No. 1 P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Description of RFP: P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways OPENING DATE: 3:00 P.M. (Our Clock) November 14, 2007 To all prospective bidders under the specifications and contract documents described above, the following changes are hereby made. Additions: • Study area map for the Alley Master Plan RFP Attached. • The proposed budget for this project is approximately $50,000. Please contact John D. Stephen, CPPO, CPPB, Senior Buyer at (970) 221-6777 with any questions regarding this addendum. RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY A WRITTEN STATEMENT ENCLOSED WITH THE BID/QUOTE STATING THAT THIS ADDENDUM HAS BEEN RECEIVED. Administrative Services Purchasing Division 215 N. Mason St. 2nd Floor PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6775 970.221.6707 fcgov.com/purchasing STUDY AREA Focused within area defined by the golden yellow line ADDENDUM No. 2 P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Description of RFP: P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways OPENING DATE: 3:00 P.M. (Our Clock) November 14, 2007 To all prospective bidders under the specifications and contract documents described above, the following changes are hereby made. • LINKS to Documents Identified in RFP 2004 Fort Collins Downtown Strategic Plan http://www.ci.fort-collins.co.us/cityplanning/pdf/dsp-doc.pdf Refer to Section 2.4 Pedestrian 2007 UniverCity Connections Report From The Stakeholders http://www.univercityconnections.org/ Refer to Transit and Mobility chapter, page 28. • CLARIFICATIONS based on questions received at pre-bid meeting: • It is the expectation of the DDA that there will be at least 3 public meeting as stated on page 4 of the RFP. On page 6, it is an error where stated that at least 4 public meetings will be held. • The DDA staff will arrange access to GIS coverage of building footprints, parcel lines, etc., for use by the winning firm. This data will not be made available for preparing RFP’s. • As an additional deliverable, the Final Master Plan Document as defined on Page 7, shall include an estimate of probable construction costs for each of the Preferred pedestrian connections. • No proposal of feasibility fees is required in the bids. This project is not seeking feasibility analysis as previously stated on Page 7, VII.Fees. Administrative Services Purchasing Division 215 N. Mason St. 2nd Floor PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6775 970.221.6707 fcgov.com/purchasing • SUMMARY OF DDA STAFF COMMENTS made at Pre-bid meeting: The DDA envisions this project as both an economic development investment to drive more rear-building façade improvements, but also as a project to create cool and exciting designed pedestrian connections that are safe, functional, and distinctive. The plan will communicate design concepts and cost estimates, but as equally important, the planning process will serve as a problem solving exercise to address such issues as delivery truck access and circulation, private parking circulation, trash/recycling storage and pick-up issues, etc. The intent is to identify and analyze a menu of solutions for the aforementioned issues, and to recommend appropriate solutions from this menu for individual pedestrian connections. As stated in the RFP document, the supporting plans for an enhanced pedestrian system in the downtown include the 2004 Fort Collins Downtown Strategic Plan, and more recently the UniverCity Connections Transit and Mobility Task Group recommendation to expand the concept to the UniverCity Connections study area. The 2004 Fort Collins Downtown Strategic Plan identified nearly all of the alleyways in the downtown area for enhancement, but with the advent of the UniverCity Connections process, and knowledge of how much actual costs are for alley enhancement (Tenney Court and Trimble Court) the DDA is looking at isolating the logical choices for enhanced pedestrian connections over a broader area. The DDA expects there will likely be 10 – 15 enhanced pedestrian connections identified in the master plan. The DDA feels there are some obvious pedestrian connections that are well suited for this master plan, and examples include Poudre Street and a possible connection from Willow Street to Jefferson Street (between Linden and College Ave) in the Downtown River District. Other examples include the north/south alley between College Avenue and Remington Street running from E. Mountain Avenue to Olive Street behind the Cupboard and the proposed Corporex hotel site in the public parking lot on Remington Street. Another example includes the extension of Tenney Court south of W. Mountain between College Avenue and Mason Street behind the Stonehouse Grill and City Drug. In the downtown-campus area, enhancements to the alley and parking area behind Chipotle and The Garment District north of Laurel Avenue between College Avenue and Mason Street should be explored. South of Olive Street, the DDA is interested in enhancing east/west pedestrian connections to the Mason Corridor, and is not looking for this master plan to suggest streetscape enhancements on Mason Street. The idea is to identify and make the logical east/west pedestrian connections from the adjacent blocks to Mason Street, and from such destinations as the Lincoln Center. The DDA will look to the expertise of the consultant team to identify and make recommendations for other logical pedestrian connections. It is possible that some traditional pedestrian sidewalks will emerge as the recommended connection, but the more alleyway enhancements and “goat paths” that are recommended for enhancement the more closely this master plan will adhere to the pedestrian strategy identified in the 2004 Downtown Strategic Plan. The RFP document refers to “goat paths” as possible enhanced connections. An example of a “goat path” that many pedestrians already utilize is the First National Bank parking lot north of Olive Street between Howes and Mason Streets. If a pedestrian is walking from Old Town to the Post Office, it is a natural shortcut to cut across this parking lot instead of following the traditional sidewalk path around the property. If for example, this natural connection is deemed well suited for enhancement, then part of the implementation strategy in the master plan should include a recommendation that the DDA negotiate and acquire a public access easement across the First National Bank property. The concept sketches requested in 11x17 inch format as a deliverable are envisioned as one-page per pedestrian connection using a combination of a plan- view rendering and one or two perspective renderings that invokes a potential theme, artistic or otherwise, or highlights a unique urban view shed in the pedestrian connection. • PREBID ATTENDANCE (attached) Please contact John D. Stephen, CPPO, CPPB, Senior Buyer at (970) 221-6777 with any questions regarding this addendum. RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY A WRITTEN STATEMENT ENCLOSED WITH THE BID/QUOTE STATING THAT THIS ADDENDUM HAS BEEN RECEIVED. ADDENDUM No. 3 P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Description of RFP: P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways OPENING DATE: 3:00 P.M. (Our Clock) November 14, 2007 To all prospective bidders under the specifications and contract documents described above, the following changes are hereby made. Responses to Bidder’s Questions 1. Q: When does the current DDA tax increment district sunset? DDA: The current tax increment district expires on 12/31/2011 2. Q: Is the DDA tied to the current lighting scheme used in the two improved alleys, or are you looking for different ideas in the concept stage? DDA: NO we are not tied to the current lighting scheme, and YES new ideas and lighting concepts are encouraged in this concept stage. In this plan we do not expect a specific palette of luminaries or site/street furnishings to be defined. 3. Q: Is signage to be a part of this scope and fee? DDA: Yes, development of concepts for basic directional signage is part of the scope and fee. Our expectation of basic directional signage includes the name of the pedestrian link, or a basic directional message such as “To Mason Street”. Private building signs or interpretive signage is not included in this scope and fee. 4. Q: Does aerial mapping exist for the study area, and will it be provided? DDA: Yes, aerial photo coverage will be available. 5. Q: Will the GIS data provided to the winning firm include alleyway related data or is that something that will need to be created? DDA: To the extent that alley data has already been created by the City of Fort Collins, it will be made available. It is not expected that any new data will need to be created. Please contact John D. Stephen, CPPO, CPPB, Senior Buyer at (970) 221-6777 with any questions regarding this addendum. RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY A WRITTEN STATEMENT ENCLOSED WITH THE BID/QUOTE STATING THAT THIS ADDENDUM HAS BEEN RECEIVED. Administrative Services Purchasing Division 215 N. Mason St. 2nd Floor PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6775 970.221.6707 fcgov.com/purchasing 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL P1092 Master Plan for Downtown Alleys and Integrated Walkways The Fort Collins Downtown Development Authority (“DDA”) is soliciting proposals from qualified consultants with broad experience in streetscape, civic area design, and pedestrian facility planning to develop a master plan for downtown alleys and integrated walkways with an emphasis on connectivity from Old Town to the Downtown River District and the Colorado State University campus. The master plan will describe the means by which the DDA, the City, and affiliated stakeholders can achieve the vision for creating an integrated pedestrian network through the identification and enhancement of formal and informal pedestrian pathways and facilities. The master plan will contain a conceptual design component. The DDA encourages teams comprised of a lead urban design or landscape architecture firm with a supporting role provided by a qualified civil engineering firm to ensure a detailed and accurate assessment of utility issues. Written proposals, five (5) will be received at the City of Fort Collins' Purchasing Division, 215 North Mason St., 2nd floor, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524. Proposals will be received before 3:00 p.m. (our clock), November 14, 2007. Proposal No. P1092. If delivered, they are to be sent to 215 North Mason Street, 2nd Floor, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524. If mailed, the address is P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, 80522-0580. A pre-proposal meeting will be held October 29, at 2:00 p.m. at 215 N Mason, Conference Room 2A. Questions concerning the scope of the project should be directed to Matt Robenalt, Project Manager of the Downtown Development Authority, 970-419-4381 or e-mail at mrobenalt@fcgov.com Questions regarding proposals submittal or process should be directed to John D. Stephen, CPPO, CPPB, Senior Buyer (970) 221-6777. A copy of the Proposal may be obtained as follows: 1. Download the Proposal/Bid from the BuySpeed Webpage, https://secure2.fcgov.com/bso/login.jsp 2. Come by Purchasing at 215 North Mason St., 2nd floor, Fort Collins, and request a copy of the Bid. Administrative Services Purchasing Division 215 N. Mason St. 2nd Floor PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6775 970.221.6707 fcgov.com/purchasing 2 Sales Prohibited/Conflict of Interest: No officer, employee, or member of City Council, shall have a financial interest in the sale to the City of any real or personal property, equipment, material, supplies or services where such officer or employee exercises directly or indirectly any decision-making authority concerning such sale or any supervisory authority over the services to be rendered. This rule also applies to subcontracts with the City. Soliciting or accepting any gift, gratuity favor, entertainment, kickback or any items of monetary value from any person who has or is seeking to do business with the City of Fort Collins is prohibited. Collusive or sham proposals: Any proposal deemed to be collusive or a sham proposal will be rejected and reported to authorities as such. Your authorized signature of this proposal assures that such proposal is genuine and is not a collusive or sham proposal. The City of Fort Collins reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any irregularities or informalities. Sincerely, James B. O'Neill II, CPPO, FNIGP Director of Purchasing & Risk Management