Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGALATIA ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 36 90, A - CORRESPONDENCE - APPLICANT COMMUNICATIONSeptember 6, 1990 City of Fort Collins City Council c/o Development Services P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear Council Members; CVP@P@ urban design, inc. 3030 south college ave., suite 200 fort collins, colorado 80525 (303) 226-4074 The owner of the Galatia property would like to offer the following information to assist in your review of the proposed annexation and Urban Growth Area Amendment affecting this site: 1. The subject property is under a single ownership, and has been a single parcel for at least the past 18 years. It is our understanding that it not legally acceptable to use the annexation process as a means of subdividing a property. 2. Although the current UGA boundary line is located only one half mile east of I-25 at this location, the Urban Growth Area does extend one mile east of I-25 to County Road 5 a short distance to the north of the Galatia property. 3. When the UGA boundary was established, the City Staff did not do an exhaustive ownership study of all properties affected. Staff has indicated that, had they realized the configuration of ownership of the Galatia property, the UGA would have most likely been extended to C.R. 5, as it is to the north of the property. 4. The City-s Master Street Plan, Water Master Plan, and planned service extensions by Light and Power, all have been designed to provide urban services east to C.R. 5 at this location. 5. The Intergovernmental Agreement indicates that: — A UGA boundary amendment can be granted when proof is presented of a technical mistake in delineating the present UGA boundary. — When a voluntary annexation petition is approved by a municipality for an area which is located outside the current UGA district, the annexed area shall be considered inside the Urban Growth Area. — Effective January 1, 1988, a UGA boundary which divides an existing property may be administratively amended to conform to the property ownership line. urban design, inc. 6. Recent completion of the diamond interchange at Prospect Road and the initial work on the Prospect Corridor Study have indicated that Prospect-s importance as an entryway into Fort Collins is equal to that of Highway 14. 7. Because of physical constraints (irrigation ditches and existing intersections on the south side of Prospect), and typical spacing of future signalized intersections, the best location for a collector — east of the frontage road — to intersect Prospect is east of the current UGA boundary line. For the above reasons, we believe that amending the UGA boundary and allowing the Galatia Annexation to proceed through the review process is appropriate. It is our understanding that the Council will consider the Urban Growth Area Amendment and the Resolution scheduling the public hearings for the Galatia Annexation at your September 18 meeting. If we can provide any addional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, z4ff -k� -AittlaAz� Eldon Ward, President Cityscape Urban Design, Inc. cc: George Pavlakis