HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST VINE STREETS FACILITY PUD AMENDED FINAL - 30 91D - CORRESPONDENCE - TRANSPORTATION ISSUETed Shepard - Sand/Saltaand Traffic Or 'tions Relocation Project__,__.___
From: Jack Gianola
To: Ted Shepard
Date: 12/23/98 5:02AM
Subject: Sand/Salt and Traffic Operations Relocation Project
Ted:
This is the follow up on our telephone conversation of this morning regarding our second submittal for the
Sand/Salt and Traffic Operations Project located at our Streets Facility at 625 9th Street.
We have been working with CDOT over the last couple years in which they are interested in purchasing
some property from us on our site for their use. They want to relocate their existing operation just north of
our site across Vine Street to this new location. We need their property for the extension of Linden to the
north.
We are making our second submittal today and with that submittal will be showing some items we would
like to do on our site but were in conflict with some comments that were on the first submittal from the
CDOT project adjacent to our site. (Mike Ludwig was the planner for their project). We would like to
boordinate our common issues and let you know what they are:
r 11 a request for a pedestrain sidewalk from Linden to the existing site and from 9th Street to the main
entrance of our existing site. This issue has been worked out between Eric B, Kathleen R, and Larry S-we
will not need the sidewalk from Linden to the existing site, but will be constructing the sidewalk from 9th to
e existing main entrance.
2)our plan will be showing a 6 foot chain link fence around our site one foot off the property line with a five
oot landscaping buffer between this fence and our pavement. We would like this same detail to apply on
the CDOT site. This fence is needed for security. Our current site has this type of fence. On the CDOT
submittal this fence was requested to be a 6 foot wood fence and placed 5 feet off the property line with a
landscape buffer outside the fence. This will not work on this site as our north property line is the BNRR
ROW which acts as a buffer from the north. We would like this same detail be applied to the west and
outh property lines, also.
3ve will be installing a security gate on the existing access road on our west property line, which, also, is
e west property line of the CDOT site. Our current site is totally secure and we would like to continue this
situation on our new site and CDOT's site. The CDOT submittal said we could not install this security
gate. Our access road is considered a private road. Also, their was a request that curb and gutter be
installed on our access road- again, this is a private road and we have reviewed this item with Eric B,
Larry S. and Gary D.
If this is confusing, we are available to meet with you. We, again, are trying to coordinfile the two
submittals as our two sites have several items in common in which they have the opportunity to use our
site for their activities. This is the main reason they want to relocate next to our operation.
Jack G.
CC: Eric Bracke, Larry Schneider --
IIAKE J`vtiE 7711-r ,rhaus C/N cti 7/IC Penn/.-_