HomeMy WebLinkAboutPICKETT THIRD ANNEXATION AND ZONING 2.18.92 CITY COUNCIL HEARING - 56 91B, C - REPORTS - FIRST READINGAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
ITEM NUMBER: 35 a-c
DATE: February 18, 1992
STAFF: Ken Waido
SUBJECT:
Items Related to the Pickett Third Annexation and Zoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the annexation and zoning request. The Planning and
Zoning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the annexation and requested
zoning.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A. Resolution 92-34 Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Determinations
Regarding the Pickett Third Annexation.
B. [fearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. P6 1992, Annexing
Approximately 10,605 Square feet, Known as the Pickett Third Annexation.
C. Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 9L, 1992, Zoning Approximately
10,605 Square feet, Known as the Pickett Third Annexation, Into the R-P,
Planned Residential, Zoning District.
This is a request to annex and zone approximately 10,605 square feet located just
south of the terminus of Westview Road, south of Country Club Road. The
requested zoning is the R-P, Planned Residential, District. The property is
presently developed as a part of Lot #5 of the Terry Ridge Subdivision. The area
to be annexed will be used as street right-of-way to provide access to the
Pheasant Ridge Estates Subdivision, a proposed residential development within the
city limits. The property is currently zoned FA Farming in the County. This is
a voluntary annexation.
APPLICANT: Gary Nordic OWNER: Eric Peterson
809 W. Harmony Road 1919 Westview Road
Ft. Collins, Co 80525 Ft. Collins, CO 80521
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Gary Nordic, on behalf of the owner, Eric Peterson, has submitted
a written petition requesting annexation of approximately 10,605 square feet
located just south of the terminus of Westview Road, south of Country Club Road.
The requested zoning is the R-P, Planned Residential, District. The property is
presently developed as a part of Lot #5 of the Terry Ridge Subdivision. The area
to be annexed will be used as street right-of-way to provide access to the
Pheasant Ridge Estates Subdivision, a proposed residential development within the
city limits. The property is currently zoned FA Farming in the County. This is
a voluntary annexation.
P &. Z MINUTES
January 27, 1992
The motion to recommend approval carried 7-0.
PICKETT SECOND ANNEXATION AND ZONING #56-91A AND PICKETT THIRD
ANNEXATION AND ZONING #56-91B C
Mr. Waido felt it was in the best interest to combine for discussion purposes items 16 and 17.
Chairman Strom agreed and stated that two votes must be taken.
Mr. Waido gave a description of the proposed projects. Staff recommended approval of both
items of annexation and zoning.
Member Walker stated that it seemed peculiar to have these two extremely small pieces of
ground being annexed. He also questioned the circumstances regarding the annexation of the
land.
Mr. Waido stated that the circumstances go back to the conditions with which the Board placed
on the approval of the Pheasant Ridge Subdivision. When the Board approved that subdivision
there were four conditions. Two of them specifically were related to access to the property:
the first condition dealing with access to the west from Spaulding Lane and the fourth condition
related to having access to the northeast into Westview Road. In order to comply with the
conditions that the Board put on for preliminary approval it was determined by the property
owner and the developer that this was the method they would like to propose to address those
conditions.
Mr. Eldon Ward, Cityscape Urban Design, spoke on behalf of Gary Nordic the applicant. Mr.
Ward stated that the annexation was a technical solution to getting access to this property. The
property controls the south half of the frontage at the end of Spaulding Lane, but the north half
would have to clip the comer of the property to the north. Mr. Ward stated that the County
objected to deeding the right-of-way due to the effect of a subdivided lot and would either need
to go through an extensive replatting process through the County or it was suggested that since
City streets were being dealt with and a condition that was placed by the Planning and Zoning
Board, that we simply annex the right-of-way.
Member Walker then clarified that both annexations would be used for street extensions for
people to get into the properties.
Mr. Ward stated that was correct according to the approved preliminary plan.
P
P & Z MINUTES
January 27, 1992
Chairman Strom asked for public input.
Mr. Jim Dixon, Lot 16 of Puebla Vista Estates, stated that the annexation of the property would
place a street on both sides of his property and he was opposed to that. Mr. Dixon was not
opposed to the subdivision itself, but he is opposed to where the street comes. Mr. Dixon would
like to know about how far from his property the road would be placed and would there be any
fencing or shrubbery put in to take away the impact of the traffic noise, and street lighting.
Mr. Dale Moon, lives on Westview Road, stated that he was also opposed to putting the street
through. Mr. Moon pointed out that when he moved there, the Homeowners Covenants
prevented him from selling or giving a sliver the land to anyone for any kind of use and yet his
neighbor across the street elected to give or sell a portion of his land to the developer which is
in direct violation of the covenants. Mr. Moon would like to know what the reason was to
annex this property, when a couple of months ago the Board approved the developer to proceed
on through to the acreage.
Mr. Mike Backlund, 2114 Westview Road, stated he was irritated that he did not receive any
notification of the meetings. Mr. Backlund wanted to know what the date was of the last update
of the master plan.
Mr. Backlund bought his house four years ago and at that time there was a dedicated easement
that went virtually straight through. Mr. Backlund understood that the County approved the
abolishment of this easement because they simply did not want the increased traffic dumping
onto Lemay. Mr. Backlund stated that he was told that a traffic study was done, but he has yet
to see the results. Mr. Backlund referred to the Board meeting minutes of July 22, 1991, which
Mr. Nordic stated that the traffic study showed minimum impact on the entire area and would
not affect the quality of life. Mr. Backlund also stated that there would be a 400% increase in
traffic which he felt would not be of minimum impact for that area.
Mr. Backlund found that the original master plan showed access to this site through the south.
Mr. Backlund stated that at a neighborhood meeting Mr. Nordic made it very clear that the
reason why he did not approach this access method was simply the matter of economics. In
order for Mr. Nordic to approach this access he would have to build a bridge over the existing
canal and with the number of homes he was proposing it just would not be economically
feasible. Mr. Backlund also felt that the reason behind Mr. Nordic not using Spaulding Road
is due to the existing trailer park and French's Cut Flowers, which is not as eye catching as
going through their development.
9
P & Z MINUTES
January 27,1992
Chairman Strom closed the public input session.
Chairman Strom referenced Mr. Dixon's point of the alignment of the street relative to his
property.
Mr. Ward stated that he did not have a copy of the plans, but a point of clarification was that
the street right-of-way swings to the east and the property line between Puebla Vista and
Pheasant Ridge was not as far to the wesc as shown on the map. The street angles over and
clips through the north end of Pheasant Ridge without a double frontage to the lot in question,
contrary to the way it was shown on the map.
Chairman Strom then directed the question of covenants in Puebla Vista to Deputy City Attorney
Paul Eckman.
Mr. Eckman felt it would not have been appropriate for the Board or any City Board to judge
whether the covenants should permit or prohibit any particular land use. He stated that it would
be for the courts to decide and not for a City Board or Commission.
Chairman Strom stated that the annexation before the Board had no effect on enforcing covenants
and any enforcement of those covenants would be between property owners.
Mr. Carroll felt the question directed to the Board asked if they could state that the covenants
would not apply, but he felt Mr. Moon thought that the Board would somehow do away with
the covenants by approving this.
Mr. Eckman stated that he did not feel that the Board would be able to do away with the
covenants. He also felt that the covenants still stood and could be enforced.
Chairman Strom stated to Mr. Backlund that he was sorry he was not informed of the previous
meetings. Chairman Strom also noted to Mr. Backlund that the Board actually had a tremendous
amount of information that was reviewed in the process of evaluating the development plan for
this property. He stated that the Board was at the point now with an approved preliminary
development plan of just strictly considering an annexation for two small pieces of ground.
Member O'Dell moved to recommend approval of the Pickett Second Annexation and
Zoning, f156-91A.
Member Klataske seconded the motion.
10
C
P & Z MINUTES
January 27, 1992 -
Member Carroll stated that the Board did go into great detail on this project back in July. The
residents of the community presented their points, the staff gave the Board the history of the
project, City boundaries were taken into consideration, the applicant made a presentation, and
at that time the Board made a decision. The question that was presented was not to reconsider
the position that the Board took back in July, but to approve the annexation.
The motion to recommend approval carried 7-0.
Member Cottier moved to recommend approval of the Pickett Third Annexation and
Zoning, #56-91B,C.
Member Carroll seconded the motion.
The motion to recommend approval carried 7-0.
Mr. Waido stated that Items 17 and 18 were scheduled for the first reading of the annexation
and zoning ordinances at City Council on February 18, 1992.
TACO BELL RESTAURANT PUD - FINAL #50-90A
Mr. Ted Shepard gave a description of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval.
Member Walker asked Mr. Shepard to review the details of the project.
Mr. Shepard stated that the condition of approval relating to the hours of operation had been met
with the exception of the Sunday evening closing time. The Board conditioned that the drive-
thru and dining room both close at midnight. The applicant had requested that the drive-thru
only stay open for one extra hour till 1 a.m. Mr. Shepard stated that staff recommended
approval of this modification primarily based on the fact that the circulation out the drive-thru
lane takes the customer out of the parking lot onto north bound College Avenue.
The second condition was the condition of the temporary river rock. Mr. Shepard stated that
there is a capital project going to take place around 1993 or 1994 that would effect the south side
of the property. In order to document the condition, the applicant has agreed to place the
following note on the landscape plan: "If, prior to the installation of non -living ground cover,
it becomes evident that the intersection improvements will be delayed for two or more growing
11
My name is Mike Backlund and I reside at 2114 Westview Rd. which
is the corner house of Westview and Country Club Rd.
My background is as an Engineer with Bechtel Group of Companies
based in San Francisco. I am and have been a Construction Manager
involved with construction projects such as hospitals, water
treatment & sewage treatment plants, high rise and residential
construction for the past 20 years.
My first question is regarding the Master Plan that was
accomplished regarding the area in question. What was the date of
the last update?
On my subdivision plat when I purchased my home there was an
easement dedicated to the south of westview through what is now
Puebla Vista. The county approved the abolishment of the easement
because they did not want the increased traffic dumping onto Lemay.
The number of homes in Puebla Vista is fewer than Mr. Nordicks
plan, however the city has no problems dumping additional traffic
onto Country Club Rd. What is the difference?
Traffic is a great concern to all of us. There are a number of
children that live on Westview and utilize the street to play on.
One of the reasons that I purchased my home is the fact that as a
dead-end street I knew that traffic would be at a minimum. Even
with the possibility of an easement through Puebla Vista the volume
of traffic would be negligible. There is mention of a traffic study
being accomplished. Who did this study? Who interpreted the study?
Are copies available?
In the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting minutes of July 22, 1991
it was noted that Mr. Nordick stated, "the traffic study showed
minimum impact on the entire area and would not affect the quality
of life". To my knowledge traffic studies dont normally asddress
quality of life. I ask the Board what increase in traffic
constitutes a minimum impact? 25%, 50%, 100%? My guess is that
those living on a quiet residential street and had a 100% increase
would consider that a significant impact on their lives. IN THIS
CASE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT APPRO%IMENTLY A 400% INCREASE! This
increase is only from the homes in the proposed Nordick
subdivision, not from Spaulding etc should the proposed barricade
be removed, or not placed at all.
I believe the Master Plan of this area shows access to this
property from the south on Redwood. Mr. Nordicks reluctance to
utilize this planned access is purely made on economics. He has
stated that it would be too expensive for him to build the bridge
required to make the project feasible. Obviously the city had given
this access enough thought to make it a part of their overall
planning effort. Is it now the Planning and Zoning Boards
obligation because of Mr. Nordicks profit picture to ignore
previous Master Plans? It would appear to warrant a rethinking of
the master plan of this area, before any more piece -meal decisions
are made.
As has been suggested to Mr. Nordick in previous encounters with
the Terry Ridge Homeowners Association we are not opposed to an
easement through westview with the installation of a permanent fire
barricade which will satisfy fire access requirements. This would
place access to and from the Nordick property on Spaulding Lane
which has curbs and is in good repair. This access would also
eliminate the loop that would be created by homeowners in the
Nordick proposal in trying to get to College Ave.
Lets look at the real reason Mr. Nordick is against utilizing
Spaulding Lane as access. Simply stated he does not want
prospective buyers to have to pass by the trailer park on the west
end of Spaulding and the greenhouses of Frenchs Cut Flowers on the
east end. I know that the City has a problem with the traffic from
this subdivision entering the intersection of Hiway I and
Spaulding. It appears that because this intersection which was and
is planned for modification has not been accomplished on a timely
basis, traffic will flow down westview rd as the lesser of two
evils.
In closing I would only hope that the Planning and Zoning Boards
decisions are made void of prejudice and discrimination and not
swayed by the developers bottom line, or the desire to simply
increase the tax base of Fort Collins. It seems logical to me that
as a Planning and Zoning Board menber I would want a more up to
date master plan of the area before making many of these types of
individual decisions.
1 I_
ITEM: PICKETT SECOND & THIRD
Annexation & Zoning
NUMBER: 56-919 A 56-91 % C
DATE: February 18, 1992
2 L ITEM NUMBER: 35 a-c I
The property is located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. According to
policies and agreements between the City of Fort Collins and Larimer County
contained in the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE FORT COLLINS URBAN GROWTH
AREA, the City will consider the annexation of property in the UGA when the
property is eligible for annexation according to State law. The property gains
the required 1/6 contiguity to existing city limits from a common boundary with
the Pickett Annexation to the south.
The surrounding zoning and existing land uses are as follows:
N: FA, Farming, Terry Ridge Subdivision
E: FA, Farming, Terry Ridge and Puebla Vista Estates Subdivisions
S: R-P, Planned Residential, undeveloped
W: FA, Farming, non -subdivision development
The requested zoning for this annexation is the R-P, Planned Residential
District. The R-P District designation is for areas planned as a unit to provide
a variation in use and building placement. The area to be annexed will provide
street right-of-way access to property which will eventually develop as the
Pheasant Ridge Estates Subdivision located within the city limits.
On July 22, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed a preliminary plan for
the Pheasant Ridge Estates Subdivision, a request for 25 single-family lots
located on 19.23 acres. The Board voted 6-0 to approve the preliminary plan with
the following four conditions:
1. A 46 foot wide dedicated right-of-way (ROW) be secured by the
developer/owner of Pheasant Ridge Estates from the owners of Lot #5
prior to final approval. This access easement must be accepted by
the County and recorded with the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder's
office prior to recording of Pheasant Ridge Estates subdivision
plat.
2. The determination of responsibility for perpetual maintenance of the
two detention ponds be made by the City Stormwater Utility prior to
final approval.
3. A landscape plan for the on -site detention ponds be submitted to the
City for final review.
4. Access from Spaulding Lane be reviewed by the Board with
recommendations from staff at the time of final.
This annexation will assist the developer of the Pheasant Ridge Estates
subdivision in fulfilling condition #1 above. Staff expects opposition from the
residents of the Terry Ridge Subdivision to this annexation because the
annexation will facilitate the connection of an access point from the Pheasant
Ridge Estates subdivision to Westview Road. From staff's perspective concerning
the connection to Westview Road, it is clear the Larimer County Board of
Commissioners intended to provide access to properties south of Terry Ridge
Subdivision via an extension of Westview Road when the Commissioners required a
60' wide reservation for future road R.O.W. as a part of both Lot #5 and Lot #6
of the Terry Ridge Subdivision. Technically, the annexation of this area for
street R.O.W. will do no more than officially "bend" the existing road R.O.W.
reservation to the southwest, rather than going straight south as was previously
anticipated.
DATE: February 18, 1992 3
i
Findings
.. cM NUMBER: 35 a-c
The annexation of this area is consistent with the policies and aqreements
between Larimer County and the City of Fort Collins contained in the
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE FORT COLLINS URBAN GROWTH AREA.
The area meets all criteria included in State law to qualify for a
voluntary annexation to the City of Fort Collins.
On January 7, 1992, the City Council approved a resolution which accepts
the annexation petition and determines that the petition is in compliance
with State law. The resolution also initiates the annexation process for
this property by establishing the date, time and place when a public
hearing will be held regarding the readings of the Ordinances annexing and
zoning the area.
4. The requested R-P, Planned Residential, District is in conformance with
the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the annexation and requested zoning.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board, at its regular monthly meeting on January 27,
1992, voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the proposed annexation and requested
zoning. As expected, several area property -owners raised questions and concerns
with the annexation at the Board's hearing. Most of the questions and concerns
related to the proposed Pheasant Ridge Subdivision, approved by the Board in July
of 1991, and not with the annexation per se. A copy of the Board's minutes is
attached.
RESOLUTION 92-34
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND DETERMINATIONS
REGARDING THE PICKETT THIRD ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, annexation proceedings were heretofore initiated by the Council of
the City of Fort Collins for property to be known as the Pickett Third
Annexation; and
WHEREAS, following Notice given as required by law, the Council has held a
hearing on said annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS:
Section 1. That the Council of the City of Fort Collins hereby finds that
the petition for annexation complies with the Municipal Annexation Act.
Section 2. That the Council hereby finds that there is at least one -sixth
(1/6) contiguity between the City and the property seeking annexation; that a
community of interest exists between the property proposed to be annexed and the
City; that said property is urban or will be urbanized in the near future; and
that said property is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the
City.
Section 3. That the Council further determines that the applicable parts
of said Act have been met, that an election is not required under said Act and
that there are no other terms and conditions to be imposed upon said annexation.
Section 4. That the Council further finds that notice was duly given and
a hearing was held regarding the annexation in accordance with said Act.
Section 5. That the Council concludes that the area proposed to be annexed
in the Pickett Third Annexation is eligible for annexation to the City and should
be so annexed.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort
Collins held this 18th day of February, A.D. 1992.
ayor
ATTEST:
ty Cler
ORDINANCE NO. 26 , 1992
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ANNEXING PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE
PICKETT THIRD ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
WHEREAS, Resolution 92-2, finding substantial compliance and initiating
annexation proceedings, has heretofore been adopted by the Council of the City
of Fort Collins; and
WHEREAS, the Council does hereby find and determine that it is in the best
interests of the City to annex said area to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
as follows:
Section 1. That the following described property, to wit:
A part of Lot 5, Terry Ridge, situate in the North 1/2 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 8 North, Range 69 West of the
Sixth P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, which considering the North
line of the said Southeast 1/4 as bearing East and with all bearings
contained herein relative thereto is contained within the boundary
lines which begin at the Southeast corner of said Lot 5 and run
thence along the South line of said Lot 5, S 89°57'40" W 112.15
feet; thence along the arc of a non -tangent 543.45 foot radius curve
to the left a distance of 172.42 feet, the long chord of which bears
N 24011'42" E 171.70 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said
Lot 5; thence along said Easterly line along the arc of a non -
tangent 50.00 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 49.46
feet, the long chord of which bears S 61°39'47" E 47.47 feet; thence
continuing along said Easterly line, South 134.01 feet to the point
of beginning, containing 10,605 square feet more or less;
be, and hereby is, annexed to the City of Fort Collins and made a part of said
City, to be known as the Pickett Third Annexation.
Section 2. That, in annexing said property to the City, the City does not
assume any obligation respecting the construction of water mains, sewer lines,
gas mains, electric service lines, streets or any other services or utilities in
connection with the property hereby annexed except as may be provided by the
ordinances of the City.
Section 3. That the City hereby consents, pursuant to Section 37-45-136
(3.6), C.R.S., to the inclusion of said property into the Municipal Subdistrict,
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District.
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published
this 18th day of February, A.D. 1992, and to be presented for final passage on
the 3rd day of March, A.D. 1992.
ATTEST:
ity
Mayor
Passed and adopted on final reading this 3rd day of March, A.D. 1992.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ORDINANCE N0.27 , 1992
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 29
OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND CLASSIFYING
FOR ZONING PURPOSES THE PROPERTY INCLUDED
IN THE PICKETT THIRD ANNEXATION TO THE
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows:
Section 1. That the Zoning District Map adopted pursuant to Chapter 29 of
the Code of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, changed and
amended by including the property known as the Pickett Third Annexation to the
City of Fort Collins, Colorado, in the R-P, Planned Residential Zoning District:
A part of Lot 5, Terry Ridge, situate in the North 1/2 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 8 North, Range 69 West of the
Sixth P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, which considering the North
line of the said Southeast 1/4 as bearing East and with all bearings
contained herein relative thereto is contained within the boundary
lines which begin at the Southeast corner of said Lot 5 and run
thence along the South line of said Lot 5, S 89°57'40" W 112.15
feet; thence along the arc of a non -tangent 543.45 foot radius curve
to the left a distance of 172.42 feet, the long chord of which bears
N 24011'42" E 171.70 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said
Lot 5; thence along said Easterly line along the arc of a non -
tangent 50.00 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 49.46
feet, the long chord of which bears S 61039'47" E 47.47 feet; thence
continuing along said Easterly line, South 134.01 feet to the point
of beginning, containing 10,605 square feet more or less.
Section 2. That the Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and
directed to amend said Zoning District Map in accordance with this Ordinance.
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published
this 18th day of February, A.D. 1992, and to be presented for final passage on
the 3rd day of March, A.D. 1992.
ayor
ATTEST:
ty Cler
Passed and adopted on final reading this 3rd day of March, A.D. 1992.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
'UBLISH ON �•-Ctc" f�
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE is hereby given that, on February 18, 1992, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as the matter may come on for hearing in the Council Chambers in the
City Hall, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado, the Fort Collins City
Council will hold a public hearing on the zoning of land known as the Pickett
Third Annexation.
The Pickett Third Annexation is described as follows:
A part of Lot 5, Terry Ridge, situate in the North 1/2 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 8 North, Range 69 West of the
Sixth P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, which considering the North
line of the said Southeast 1/4 as bearing East and with all bearings
contained herein relative thareto is contained within the boundary
lines which begin at the Southeast corner of said Lot 5 and run
thence along the South line of said Lot 5, S 89°57'40" W 112.15
feet; thence along the arc of a non -tangent 543.45 foot radius curve
to the left a distance of 172.42 feet, the long chord of which bears
N 24011'42" E 171.70 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said
Lot 5; thence along said Easterly line along the arc of a non -
tangent 50.00 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 49.46
feet, the long chord of which bears S 61039'47" E 47.47 feet; thence
continuing along said Easterly line, South 134.01 feet to the point
of beginning, containing 10,605 square feet more or less.
The property owner has requested, and the Planning and Zoning Board has
recommended, that said Annexation be placed in the R-P, Planned Residential
Zoning District.
Dated this llth day of February, A.D. 1992.
City Clerk ��