The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOLIVE GARDEN MINOR SUBDIVISION - 14 92 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYf W W Q M •a r d •o v 0 cn MEMORANDUM To: Ron Gates, General Mills Restaurants Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Transportation Division Fort Collins Planning Staff From: Matt Delich Date: May_22.199.9- Subject: Olive Garden Restaurant traffic study (File: 9231MEM1) General Mills Restaurants is proposing to build and operate an Olive Garden Restaurant on South College Avenue, north of Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins. An Olive Garden Restaurant is a sit down restaurant specializing in Italian food. There is currently a quality sit down restaurant on this site. The existing restaurant has access to College Avenue (right-in/right-out) and a full -turn access to Boardwalk Drive located approximately 250 feet west of College Avenue. The site plan for the Olive Garden Restaurant indicates that the College Avenue access will be closed, the Boardwalk Drive access will remain, and an access to Mason Street will be added. The Mason Street access is proposed to be located approximately 150 feet north of Boardwalk Drive. This access is' proposed to be located as far from Boardwalk Drive as is practicable. The Boardwalk Drive access lines up with an access on the south side -of the street. The access to the south currently serves only a Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) restaurant. However, it is built to provide access to a 600' X 600' parcel that will likely be developed as a commercial/ retail use. The two accesses to Boardwalk Drive (one on the north side and one on the south side) are expected to be the only accesses allowed in this segment of Boardwalk Drive. Noon and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes were collected at the College/Boardwalk intersection in May 1992 and are shown in Figure 1. Raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Also shown in Figure 1 are synthesized traffic volumes at the Mason/Boardwalk intersection. Operation at the College/Boardwalk .signalized intersection and the Mason/ Boardwalk stop sign controlled intersection is acceptable. This is shown in Table 1. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. At the time of traffic counting, the existing restaurant on this site was closed for renovation. Trip generation of the proposed Olive Garden Restaurant was obtained from information contained in Trip Generation, K ,985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS :SUMMARY REPORT JJKFZ##F#AFJFFFF##FF#FFF#FF##JF###F#FFFFJYF#J#FJFF#JYXF#AAAYFFtiFFFJ####FFF INTERSECTION.. boardwall,college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ........ i id DATE.......... 5122/92 TIME ... ...... .noon COMMENT......_ 1992 ra -------------__--__-------------- _------------------------------------ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB ES WB NB SB LT 24 35 16 138 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12-0 L 12-0 TH 13 18 1250 1341 T 12.0 T 12-0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 19 172 14 40 R 12.0 R 12.0 T - 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --..,------------------------------------- -------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 31.6 3 WB 0.00 0-00. N 0 0 0-95 5 Y 31.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N n 2 0.95 5 Y 25-8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0.9E 5 Y 25.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x NB LT x x TH X TH x RT X RT x PD x PO X W6 LT x 58 LT x -x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PE' x GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0,.0 GREEN 7.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP, DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.098 0.255 23.E C 72.0 C T 0.030 0.25E 3.4 R 0.039 0.336 16.7 C WB L 0.094 0.255 23.8 C 21.7 C T 0. 041 0-255 2a.5 C R 0.353 0._36 21.1 C NE, L 0.054 0.691 4.1 A 10.1 E. TR. 0.412 0-582 10.2 F. SE L 0.432 0.691 b B 1G.3 B - TF 0.517 0.582 10.6 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delav = 11.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0 494 LO' _ "- 196E HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT XYXYYXYYX YZYYZJRK YYYYYYXYYFYYZYX.YYZZiYXY .............................YYXa I f JTERSECT I Ot4 .. boardwa l k /college AREA TYPE. ---.OTHER ANALYST ....... mid DATE.......... 5/12/92 TIME...........+-:r. nm COMMENT...... 199 __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 1.1 36 37 183 L 12.0 L 12-0 L 12.0 L 12.^ TH 16 28 1472 1737 T 12-0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12 RT 15 205 25 36 R 11.0 R 12-0 T 12-0 T 1-,. RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12-0 TR 12_0 TR 12-0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12-0 12-0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------- ----- ---------------------------- --- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) ' Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 Y 31.6s WB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 31.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.95 5 Y 25.8 3 SB 0-00 2.00 N 0 _ 0.95 5 Y 25-8 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- SICNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT x x TH x TH x RT X RT x PD x PD x WB LT x SB LT Y, x TH x TF; x RT x RT x PD x PO x GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7 D 66.0 0.0 0.( YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 6.0 0.0 0 - - -- --- ----- --- ------ -- - -- -- ---- ----- - -- ------ - - -- ------ -------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EE L 0.047 0." 5 24.3 22.E C T 0.034 D.27s z4.2 c F' 0.030 0.350 WB L 0.091 0.215 24. b C ?3. 1 C T O.060 0.27E 24"4 C F: O.404 U.`s 50 - 7 C NB L 0.059 0.675 E.0 12.2 ft TR 0.566 0.575 12.4 6 SB L 0.783 0.67E 24.2 C 14.7 B TR 0.671 0.57" 1 .3 E. -------------------------------------------------------------------------. INTERSECTION- Delay = 14.f. (sec/,eh/ V/C = 0.6 8 LOS = 6 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ZZZ;Z###YK#ZZ;##;#;ZZZYY#Z#tZSSZY##Y;Y;Z####SZSZ#SKYZYZiiZ#Y Z.S XtXZ#ZS IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- -------------------------------------------------- --------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR_ .................. 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mason NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. noon `nem OTHER INFORMATION.... S4.9" INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WE. NE SE. ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 11 0 13 THRU -- 0 334 270 RIGHT -- 16 7 0 NUMBER OF LANES _______________________________________________________________ EB WE NE. SE ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-c --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _____________________ ____________ _ MINOR STREET W8 LEFT 12 413 409 409 397 8 RIGHT 18 756 756 756 739 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 14 851 851 851 837 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mason DATE AND TIME OF THE `CIS..... 5/22/92 noon pm OTHER INFORMATION... 1952 1994 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS Page-1 XX).f.1.XXXi1XXXXRXXRRXXYYIIXXXXXXtX{XtXXXXXXX XIXYRZX4XXXXKAYXX....... Rf IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mason NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................._�.aen pm OTHER -INFORMATION.... 01*444- INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NE: SE, ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 226 0 10 THRU --0 361 411 R.I GHT -- 41 5 0 - NUMBER;OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EE. WE. NB SI. -------------- ------- LANE-z' ------- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-F. --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(PCPh) c (pcph) c (Peph) c (pcph) e = c - v LOS P M SH P SH ------------------------------------------------ -- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 31 319 316 316 286 C RIGHT 45 733 733 733 688 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 11 827 827 827 816 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mason DATE AND TIME OF THE �.�IS..... 5/22/92 ; noon 1.9pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 2 1994 APPENDIX C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT xx.xxxx.x.x.x......... x.... .... ...x..... w... xx.xx.... x..............x.x.... INTERSECTION..boardwalV:;colle9e AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... mid DATE.......... 5/22/92 TIME......... noon r. COMMENT ....... ++ !'�.< -----------------`c------------------------------------------------------- VOLUME- GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 110 67 52 190 L 12-0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 50 46 1275 1368 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 67 219 48 101 R 17.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 31.8 3 WB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 31.8 3 N6 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.95 5 Y 25.8 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.95 5 Y 25.8 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x NB LT x x TH x TH x RT x RT x PO x PO x WB LT X SB LT x x TH X TH Y. RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------- - ------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP- LOS EB L 0.586 0.255 "O.5 D 25.b D T 0.115 0.255 .9 C R 0.137 0.336 19.3 C - W6 L 0.220 0.255 24.7 C 22.9 C T D.106 0.255 23.9 R 0 a49 0.336 2.1 C NE L 0.054 0.691 �4.1 A 10.2 E. TR 0.496 0.532 10.4 6 S6 L 0.729 0.691 1-.1 r 11.6 b TF; 0.554 D.582 11-0 E. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.8 (sec,yen) V/i = C.585 LO_: = B. 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTI0N` SUMMARY REPORT .* ........ I ........ ..xxx.................. .x.................xx........... INTERSECTI0N..boardwalk/college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mid DATE ......... .5/22/92 TIME.......... ...w+i Pm - COMMENT...... =:;=' 1094 ---------------------------------- ----- --------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WB Ne. SB EB WB NB SB LT 53 62 64 224 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 37 151 1501 1772 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12 RT 39 245 53 65 R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 1,. RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12_.0 12.0- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 31.8 3 WB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 5 Y 31.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.95 5 Y 25.8 58 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.95 5 Y 25.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x NB LT X x. TH X TH x kT x RT x Pr) x PE) x WB LT x SB LT x x TH x TH x RT x RT- x PD x PD x _ GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 11.0 62.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 6.0 0.0 0 ------------------------------------------- ------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EE L 0.267 0.275 226.1' D _:,.2 C T 0.079 0.275 24.5 C P 0.070 0-3 BS 17.8 C WB L 0. 172 0.-,75 25.2 D 22.4 C T 0.108 0.275 94.7 C fi .441 0.a'8-: 21. 2 C NE. 0.044 0.675 5.0 A 14.5 6 TR 0.626 0.542 14.8 6 SB L 0.779 0.675 20.8 _ 1?.2. C TR 0.749 0.542 16.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTFF:SECTION: Delay = Io (seciveh) V;C = 0.714 LOS _ C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS F'aae-1 XWW.KXWXXXXXWWRXXXXARYRXXWWWXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXWWWRWXRXWWWXWWXWXXXXXW IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mason NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ (Hon) noon pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 199a INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EE WE NE'. SE. ---- ---- ---- ---- _ LEFT -- 19 0 20 THRU -- 0 354 286 RIGHT -- 26 11 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EE• WE. NEI SE- ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ---------------------------------`-------------- . MINOR STREET WB LEFT 21 387 381 381 360 B RIGHT 31 736 736 736706 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 22 828 828 828 806 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST_/WEST STREET...... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mason DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYST` 5/22/92 noon prti OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 199a 1985 HCM: UNSIONAL12ED INTERSECTIONS Pegg-1 xz»»»xxzzxzzxzz»xxxzxzx»»z»zzzzzxzz:xzzzz:xxxzxzzxxzzzx»»»x»zz»»zzxxz IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mason NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. noon pni , OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB LEFT --- ---a THRU -- 0 RIGHT -- 55 NUMBER OF LANES ___________________________________________________ EE. Wd NE. SE: _______ _______ _______ ------- ---------------------- NE• SF is 382 435 9 0 LANE`, CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-S _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcpn) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET WB LEFT 37 295 292 292 254 C RIGHT 61 712 712 712 652 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 804 804 804 787 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION __________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mason DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYST' 5/22/92 : noon pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 1985 HCM: LJNSIONAL12ED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 zlzzx.Zzxzzzzzz...Mzzzzz..Y:zzzzzlk zYzzlzzzzTY zxzz'rzzYlzxxx}'xxx{ixzzRzx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------- --------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... accesses NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ noon pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 199a INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOLITHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SE ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT2 59 10 162 T HRU 18 26 1 1 RIGHT it 114 47 11 NUMF•ER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EE. WF NE 56 ------- ------- ------- ------- LANE'. 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE F'a9e-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ . MINOR STREET NB LEFT 11 689 656 THROUGH 1 774 743 RIGHT 52 999 999 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 178 702 652 THROUGH 1 822 789 RIGHT 12 996 996 MAJOR STREET Eft LEFT 2 994 994 WB LEFT 65 1000 1000 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 663 656 > 651 645 >A A > 743 742 > A 999 947 A > 653 652 > 474 474 >A A > 789 > 788 > A 996 984 A 994 992 A 1000 935 . A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... accesses DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYS 5/2%/9% nocn pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 - 1985 HCM: UNSICNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-I ZY#YYZZYZ#YYZZYYZ#Z#YZYZY#Z;Y;YYZZ#ZZZZ##YYZY Z#Z#ZYYZZZ##YY Y;;ZZYYY#X IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... accesses NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. noon pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------- - ----------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST . CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EE WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 38 6 80 THRU 14 78 1 1 RIGHT 8 84 35 5 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SF. ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 I _ 2 LANE USAGE LT n LT 1 R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page -------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 7 698 677 > 687 677 > 679 670 > THROUGH 1 778 757 > 751 > 756 > RIGHT 39 999 999 999 961 A MINOR STREET SE LEFT 88 705 670 > 671 670 > 582 582 >A A THROUGH 1 813 792 > 792 > 790 > A RIGHT 6 974 974 974 969 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 2 991 991 991 - 989 A WB LEFT 42 1000 1000 1000 958 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... boardwalk NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... accesses DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYS.Ic 5/22/92 : noon gm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 ft 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pa9a-1 X XXXXXXXXXX}XXXXXXX}:t#X}YXt}XXXYXYXXXXXXXXXXX}XX}XXX}XXXXXX}XXXXXXXX} IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mason NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ noon om OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL . --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WE NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- - 6 0 13 THRU -- 0 �78 300 RIGHT -- 12 4 0 NUMBER OF LANES ______r______________________________________________________________ EE WE NE. SE ------- ------- ------- ------- LANE`_. CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE F•aoe-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- F'OTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC IT CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 7 372 368 > 368 > 361 > B > 545 > 525 >A RIGHT 13 718 718 > 718 > 705 > A MAJOR STREET S8 LEFT 14 812 812 312 798 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------- __________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mason DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIc . 5/22/92 nour� pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 4th Edition, ITE and from a phone conversation with the marketing staff of the Olive Garden Restaurants (General Mills). Table 2 shows the expected daily, noon peak, and afternoon peak trip generation. The newly generated trips were distributed as follows: Mason Street north and south of Boardwalk North - 10% South - 5% College Avenue north and south of Boardwalk North - 45% South - 25% Boardwalk East of College - 15% Since traffic counts were not obtained at the Boardwalk/KFC access, a trip generation analysis was also conducted on it. These trips were distributed as indicated in the previous paragraph. One short range future year (1994) was analyzed. The greatest impact to the key intersections in this area will be caused by development of the 600' X 600' parcel to the south of Boardwalk Drive. It is not known when this will occur, but it is not likely to occur before 1995. When this larger parcel is proposed for development, a traffic study should be prepared which will also include the Olive Garden Restaurant. The traffic study for this larger parcel should include the long range analysis. Compared to the development that is likely to occur on this larger parcel, the impact of the Olive Garden will be small. Background traffic is defined as that traffic which is on the street system, but is not related to the proposed development. Historic counts on College Avenue indicate that traffic has been fairly stable over the past few years. Therefore, the background traffic on College Avenue was increased by 1 percent per year. Since the traffic on College Avenue is high, even this modest percent increase results in a substantial actual increase. Selective turning movements at the College/Boardwalk intersection include traffic that will be generated at the new Fort Collins Post Office, which should be opened by the end of 1992. Traffic on Mason Street was increased at 3 percent per year. Figure 2 shows the 1994 peak hour traffic at the key intersections. The key intersections shown in Figure 2 were analyzed with the existing control and geometrics. Table 3 shows the results of those analyses. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. All intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. The current striped geometrics on the public streets (College Avenue, Boardwalk Drive, and Mason Street) meet or exceed the geometric requirements of the future traffic with one exception. The eastbound left -turn lane on Boardwalk Drive approaching College Avenue should be at least 130 feet long plus taper. It is currently 120 feet long plus taper. There is currently a westbound left -turn lane on Boardwalk Drive approaching the KFC access. This left -turn lane is not warranted. Therefore, the eastbound turn s- 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe-I ##YYYYYY#Y#Y#YYYYYYYYYYYYYRYIYYYYY#YYYYYY#Y#YY#YYY.YYYYYYfiKY#YYY#Y YY:t IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... mason NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5/22/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. noon pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WE NE'. SE' ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 3 0 11 THRU -- 0 434 447 RIGHT -- 6 3 0 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------------------- EE. WE• NE. SE• ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ - MINOR STREET WB LEFT 3 273 270 > 270 > 267 > C - 450 > 440 >A RIGHT 7 674 674 > 674 > 668 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 12 764 764 764 752 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... mason DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYST" 5/22/92 : noon pm OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 1994 lane can be lengthened at the expense of the unwarranted lane. However, rather than restripe Boardwalk Drive to gain the little additional length needed, it is recommended that the existing striping remain as is. After the Olive Carden Restaurant is open for a few months (3 or more), traffic should be monitored to determine if the additional length is needed. Adjustments can be made pending the results of that determination. Conclusions It is concluded that with the development of the Olive Garden Restaurant, traffic operation at the key intersections will be acceptable in the short range future. The existing geometrics on the public streets should remain. Traffic should be monitored after the restaurant is in operation for a number of months to verify the geometric recommendation. When the parcel to the south of Boardwalk is proposed for development, the long range impacts on the area streets should be determined. BOARDWALK Q N t, CM ce) T co co \ T M T \ vCOr R— 172/205 • 18/28 35/36 24/ 1 1 —� T. 13/16 —► I I 19/15---` r`Nto co r N 00 r W ul T \ r O c�v .J T Noon / PM 1992 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 1 � T \T N o\ O M M T f /� 1 Ir 6// 33 W SITE z I I M N c') � Q\ 00 N M M N \ r. (D \ 00 O N N N 0) 00 \ M T jT CM O E a .\- O (ND T z w 28/55 19/34 BOARDWALK 2/2 --) 18/14 --� 1 1 / 8 ---,, %w W J J 01 N In T N CO CON T (D O 114/84 r 8 /3 59/38 1 j (' 110/53 I I 50/37 W E to 67/39 `O O M z^ � KFC Noon / PM 219/245 -0-- 46/51 ,— 67/62 7T'M (D O tO \ U) N r CO to \ to N r 1994 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 Table 1 1992 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection Noon PM College/Boardwalk (signal) B B Mason/Boardwalk (stop sign) WB LT B C WB RT A A SB LT A A Table 2 Trip Generation Daily Noon Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Sit -Down Restaurant - 1200 133 191 106 94 10 KSF Table 3 1994 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection Noon PM College/Boardwalk (signal) B C Mason/Boardwalk (stop sign) WB LT B C WB RT A A SB LT A A Boardwalk/Access (stop sign) NB LT/T A A NB RT A A SB LT/T A A SB RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A Mason/Access (stop sign) WB LT/RT A A SB LT A A APPENDIX A M N;AT'i HEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date 1 g q Z- Day /44/VDA T Clty rO 12 Y 0,06L1 / S R = Right turn P- D W A L K S= Straight INTERSECTION OF O 4 L F�E AND L = Lett tum TIME BEGINS BEG oc c c-Gc= coc�c��6 NAhL South 5o,+40WACK o,4RDWALe TOTAL East ""e" TOTALALL I from NORTH from SOUTH from EAST I I from WEST R I S I L I Total R I S L I Total R I S I L I Total II R S I L I Total 1 Zo-O II 9 1314 38 136 1 1 Z. 13Z(a 4 1 3-3z II (a 43 1144 1 2 1 9 I ss 1 7 1 2 1 4 1 13 1& 7s II 7Cv I IzISIII 334 133 1 38-3 1 4 3041 T 131 1 11l , 1 ( � I2-30119 1353 3Z 1314 14 3ts-I 4 13z3 117 17 114G I'? 14 I s z II 3 1 -3 18 1 1 4 11 is(o II 7 g 3 tz4Sli(a 134035-13g1 1 3O-) Is- 131(oII( 4-1 itsl 4 III 1io0 114 14 I I13 1 73 11770 II I I I I II I I I I I I I I II 12-( 11401134-( t531 Isl9 114 125-011IK IIZi-Z112$o) IF, 21 1� 139-1ZZ5' 1111 3 IZ4I S 1 Z81 113022 I 1 1 1 I I I II I I I t I I I I I II I I I I I I II I i I I I I I I II I I I I I I. I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I II I I I I II I I I II i I I I II I I I I II 430113 142� 3 1 47 3115 4o-o 1 7 141211 3$S 114g1 4 13 1 ss 13 1 3 12 1 13 1 3 II R43 44511 1 1437131K1 4g4 14 366 I g 137 �f 11 3In Z 11451 7 1 7 I s 9 11 7 I Z 13 1 1 z 1 7 1 11 9 33 s00 11 9 03413-7 14�-O 11 7 3s31 I Ts-1 1 11 ':8s I 115-11 4 11& 1 7(p 11 1 1 1 13 1 5 11 g 11 9 32- -7 s—t 5' 1ho 144010 1 s1 1 9 353 111 1 3-7311 8 --FTITT 13 1 16 1 7 9 14 1 ./0 13 1 17 11 9C, 71 7- s 3 v 1131353 50 41(p 11 g 3Z 317 1339 11 7 5* 1145 14 1 g 1 S 7 12 11 Cp 7 3 I$ Z 7 I 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 71 430-5 I (D JI731 183I 1`15 Iz5 147ZI37I1534 13490 ZO5-I Z$ I3C0 1 Z& q II/S 1(9 111 14 Z 11 31 ( 11 3(?01 APPENDIX B